[10:33] <davmor2> ara: can you set bug 337274 to be wishlist please?
[10:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 337274 in indicator-applet "Wishlist Bug:  Minimise Evolution/Other mail clients into the new notify-osd comms applet" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/337274
[10:39] <ara> davmor2: done
[10:39] <davmor2> ara: Thanks :)
[11:30] <eeejay> crap, i lost a day of work because deleted sandbox before "bzr push"
[12:03] <davmor2> eeejay: Oooops
[12:40]  * ara -> lunch
[13:07] <davmor2> Guys is anyone else having trouble with the rsync server ?
[13:08] <Daviey> davmor2: seemed to !wfm at 4am utc
[13:09] <davmor2> Daviey: It worked for me yesterday
[13:22] <mvo> hi, if someone has a somewhat current kubuntu (alpha5 or better) install, could you please test if gdebi-kde on a terminal starts? or gives a error?
[13:36] <eeejay> ara: the "is" operator only checks to see if two instances are identical (ubuntu-desktop-test:178)
[13:37] <eeejay> ara: it should just be i'f os.listdir(SCREENSHOTS_SHARE):'
[13:37] <eeejay> 'if os.listdir(SCREENSHOTS_SHARE):'
[13:38]  * eeejay adds that to his branch
[13:41]  * eeejay hops to another cafe
[13:56] <ara> eeejay: I already had fixed that early in the morning
[13:58] <ara> eeejay: with some more fixes for the bug in gedit test
[13:58] <ara> eeejay: i will comment the bug now
[14:21] <eeejay> ara: cool. thanks!
[14:26] <davmor2> schwuk: can you take a quick look at the dl-ubutnu-test-iso script in my bzr pulled version today it seem a bit borked
[14:27]  * eeejay merges from udt trunk
[14:33] <davmor2> schwuk: it's okay I removed what looks to be merge and tree comments and it's working now.  However we need to get a change put into the package in Ubuntu we need it changing from chromium.ubuntu.com/... to cdimage.ubuntu.com/... apparently chromium was full
=== kyselejsyrecek1 is now known as kyselejsyrecek
[17:02] <davmor2> cr3: meeting
[17:02] <cr3> davmor2: thanks dude :)
[17:02] <davmor2> :)
[18:20] <davmor2> sbeattie: there is an update to dl-ubuntu-test-iso that needs to get into the main package on ubuntu it changes the server from chromium to cdimage I don't know if you deal with this but I thought I'd let you know :)
[18:21] <sbeattie> davmor2: hrm, ara did the packaging, but I can probably roll a debdiff for jaunty. Can you file a bug against it?
[18:21] <sbeattie> (and subscribe me)
[18:24] <sbeattie> davmor2: I also haven't forgotten about your request to add mobile images to the script; it's just non-trivial to do, given the way the script is "structured"
[18:52] <davmor2> sbeattie: sorry I was at tea I'll do a bug in a minute
[19:06] <davmor2> sbeattie: bug 337876 I've taken the liberty of subbing you to it :)
[19:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 337876 in ubuntu-qa-tools "Jaunty: dl-ubutnu-test-iso download tool is only hitting one server" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/337876
[19:07] <sbeattie> davmor2: danke
=== fader is now known as fader|lunch
[19:08] <davmor2> how do I add a post to the qa blog?
=== mrooney1 is now known as mrooney
[19:58] <davmor2> anyone got a fresh install of jaunty knocking about?
[20:11] <charlie-tca> sure
[20:11] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu, though
[20:12] <davmor2> charlie-tca: does xubuntu jaunty use totem-gstreamer
[20:13] <charlie-tca> yes
[20:14] <davmor2> cool can you try the youtube plugin wait for it to download the codecs it needs and then try install x/ubuntu-restricted-extras from add/remove and see if it installs please,  Don't use synaptic
=== fader|lunch is now known as fader
[20:15] <charlie-tca> just go to youtube and let it add it?
[20:17] <davmor2> no charlie-tca in totem if you click on properties and select youtube and type in Linux in the search box and double click on any of the links it should auto recommend some codecs install those and then try restricted-extras
[20:17] <charlie-tca> okay
[20:18] <davmor2> playlist not proporties sorry
[20:19] <charlie-tca> You can tell how often I do this, huh?
[20:19] <davmor2> :)
[20:20] <charlie-tca> plugins are installing in totem
[20:25] <charlie-tca> Well, that failed
[20:25] <charlie-tca> eeejay: Invalid operation xubuntu-restricted-extras
[20:25] <charlie-tca> not eeejay , but E:
[20:26] <charlie-tca> in the terminal
[20:26] <charlie-tca> Looks like a valid bug?
[20:27] <eeejay> charlie-tca: I am not in liberty to say :)
[20:27] <eeejay> at liberty
[20:27] <eeejay> my grammar could be better
[20:27] <charlie-tca> yeah, I didn't mean to ask you. This stupid XChat auto completed my E: to your name
[20:29] <charlie-tca> davmor2: Installation in the terminal fails
[20:31] <charlie-tca> apt-get install xubuntu-restricted-extras  works in a different installation of Jaunty
[20:34] <davmor2> charlie-tca: yes I think it's the same issue as I'm having x-r-e conflicts with what is installed by totem libavcodec52 and libavutils49
[20:35] <charlie-tca> That's my guess, too
[20:35] <charlie-tca> I wanted to make sure I used the right apt-get, so I checked in the second install
[20:36] <davmor2> if you try to install x-r-e in synaptic it removes the others and replaces it with the unstripped versions
[20:36] <charlie-tca> why? I can do that if you need me to, but you probably got that already
[20:37] <davmor2> charlie-tca: no I'm just saying it works in one and not the others it's stupid
[20:38] <charlie-tca> Yes, I agree with that.
[20:38] <charlie-tca> apt-get should work if synaptic does.
[20:39] <davmor2> is it just me or is launchpad playing up when you try and report a bug I keep getting timeout
[20:41] <charlie-tca> A lot slow
[21:14] <XaMou> Hi. I have à little problem with the alpha 5 of Jaunty. It's impossible to change the network configuration with the graphical interface. (Sorry for my english ^^)
[21:19] <davmor2> XaMou: how do you mean.  I can change from wifi spot to wifi spot or do you mean you have a cable in and you want it to use wifi?
[23:23] <mrooney> charlie-tca: wow, how does it work in synaptic?
[23:24] <charlie-tca> what?
[23:24] <charlie-tca> Installing xubuntu-restricted-extras after youtube?
[23:25] <mrooney> charlie-tca: yeah
[23:25] <mrooney> I mean, what does synaptic do that apt-get isn't or vice versa
[23:25] <charlie-tca> Oh, I don't know. I am just a tester/user/triager
[23:26] <mrooney> ah ok
[23:26] <mrooney> maybe synaptic uses aptitude
[23:26] <charlie-tca> with a little bit of knowledge. Synaptic, apt-get, and aptitude as I understand them, all use their own databases
[23:27] <charlie-tca> So, one of them might work, and the other one won't because of that
[23:27] <charlie-tca> That ain't the right technical argument, it is my own wording
[23:28] <mrooney> yeah, I know they do things differently sometimes, so that could be why
[23:28] <mrooney> either way probably it is a bug
[23:28] <charlie-tca> Yeah, that explanation fits in my head.
[23:28] <charlie-tca> I think it is a bug
[23:29] <charlie-tca> since apt-get install just fails with an error
[23:29] <charlie-tca> Synaptic, according to davmor2, will remove the installed apps and then install them again