| ara | good morning all :-) | 06:52 |
|---|---|---|
| doomik | Hello | 10:01 |
| ara | hey doomik | 10:15 |
| doomik | the testing distro will be available at 9 March ? | 10:16 |
| ara | doomik: what do you mean by testing distro? | 11:10 |
| davmor2 | doomik: We will be smoke testing the various desktops on the 9th of march | 11:13 |
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| sbeattie | davmor2: are you not smoketesting on a daily basis anymore? | 14:40 |
| === beaver is now known as CleanRat | ||
| stgraber | sbeattie: ping, small question about the SRU process :) around ? | 16:52 |
| sbeattie | stgraber: ask away. | 16:52 |
| stgraber | sbeattie: I'm looking at bug 290399 and it seems that they're waiting for an approval before getting the package uploaded to -proposed | 16:54 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 290399 in redhat-cluster "After ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/290399 | 16:54 |
| stgraber | though looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates the process seems to be to uploaded to -proposed then get the archive admins validate it | 16:54 |
| stgraber | and then do the usual QA to get it uploaded to -updates after validation | 16:54 |
| sbeattie | stgraber: hrm, according to zul's comment, he uploaded it. Is that not the case? | 16:56 |
| stgraber | nope | 16:56 |
| stgraber | not in the queue and not in -proposed | 16:56 |
| sbeattie | hrm, well, the SRU team can't accept it until there's an upload. Wonder what happened there. | 16:58 |
| * sbeattie goes to read the scrollback in #ubuntu-server as well. | 16:58 | |
| apw | cr3 who normally does checkbox releases? | 16:59 |
| cr3 | apw: I've mostly done them but schwuk could handle them as well, what's up? | 16:59 |
| apw | was trying to get a feel for how often they get pushed, if there is a schedule etc | 17:00 |
| apw | as i am carrying stuff in there now :) want to get a feel for when it goes out | 17:00 |
| apw | also ... is checkbox in the desktop seed now, will it be on by defualt? | 17:00 |
| cr3 | apw: no schedule, we just try to pack as much in there as possible before the release :) | 17:00 |
| cr3 | apw: should be on by default on desktop indeed | 17:01 |
| apw | will there be another releaase before beta ships? | 17:01 |
| cr3 | apw: yes | 17:01 |
| apw | cool, check with me that i've shoved all the suspend_test stuff in would you ... if we do a public call for testing it would make sense to use the version installed on the machine if its there | 17:02 |
| cr3 | apw: will do | 17:02 |
| apw | cr3, on another note, did you have any thoughts on the test with output issue? | 17:02 |
| sbeattie | cr3: given the changes since 0.5, should probably do an upload before a6. | 17:02 |
| apw | alpha6 is next thursday right? | 17:03 |
| cr3 | sbeattie: that would be the responsible thing to do :) | 17:03 |
| cr3 | apw: yeah, I'd really like to be able to see test output in the interface. I'll try to get it done before beta | 17:03 |
| apw | so cool. i'll make sure my stuff is pushed up by the end of monday. its probabally done already | 17:03 |
| sbeattie | cr3: ah, I stand corrected, I'll not expect an upload until the beta then. :-) | 17:03 |
| * sbeattie ducks | 17:04 | |
| cr3 | sbeattie: you know me too well :) | 17:04 |
| apw | cr3 cool. its a bit of a blocker for shipping any of the suspend tests run from checkbox imo | 17:04 |
| apw | not that it is stopping any testing as we have the direct interface right now | 17:04 |
| apw | so a blocker, but not an issue if that makes any sense | 17:05 |
| cr3 | apw: noted, I'll give it top after hours priority :) | 17:05 |
| apw | heheh ... also have you thought about continuing after a crash? | 17:05 |
| sbeattie | cr3: BTW, re bug 324215, it's only an issue due to the package transition correct? My attempts to trigger the purge failure on hardy and intrepid were unsuccessful. | 17:06 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 324215 in checkbox "hwtest-gtk fails to uninstall if hwtest is no longer installed" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/324215 | 17:06 |
| sbeattie | ... because hwtest-gtk and hwtest-cli would get uninstalled before hwtest, at least via apt. | 17:06 |
| cr3 | sbeattie: right, and I was making crappy assumptions in my debian *rm scripts | 17:07 |
| cr3 | apw: I've thought about it, but I'm still not sure about the user experience in those circumstances | 17:08 |
| sbeattie | cr3: if not, we could push an SRU; I went ahead and cherry-picked the relevant bits here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sbeattie/checkbox/lp324215/revision/295 | 17:08 |
| apw | cr3, pretty much any test which does suspend or hibernate and doesn't come back could do with some way for the user to say "continue" | 17:08 |
| cr3 | apw: should checkbox just start from where it left off? should the user be prompted for all the tests again, but having them prefilled with previous values? | 17:08 |
| apw | and get the same box up with 'FAILED' delected | 17:08 |
| apw | i would continue from the same place if possible | 17:09 |
| apw | in autotest we do that by freezeing the state machine and reloading it between tests | 17:09 |
| cr3 | apw: anything is possible, I'm just wondering what would be correct. are there other applications like this which behave in a similar fashion? | 17:10 |
| cr3 | apw: for example, firefox prompts the user to recover tabs or somesuch, so should checkbox also provide the same dialog | 17:10 |
| apw | yeah 'continnue you existing test run?' | 17:10 |
| apw | would be reasonable, i would then like it to jump to the right test again | 17:10 |
| cr3 | sbeattie: if you could sru that cherry pick, that'd be really awesome! | 17:11 |
| cr3 | sbeattie: by the way, as long as you're sru'ing checkbox, I think there's another bug I'd like to verify... one moment | 17:11 |
| cr3 | apw: right, it's details like that which are mostly stopping me | 17:12 |
| cr3 | apw: I could also have a check box saying "don't remind me again" or somesuch, still like in firefox | 17:12 |
| cr3 | apw: when I implement new features, I try not to invent too much and rely on precedent from other applications which might be already familiar to users | 17:13 |
| apw | sensible enough | 17:13 |
| cr3 | apw: just to be sure, your priority would be viewing output before recovery, right? | 17:13 |
| apw | i would thing a dialog that says " you were mid-test" with "continue test", "scrap test", "ignore test" sort fo thing | 17:14 |
| cr3 | sbeattie: I'd also like to sru bug #323284, especially since dapper is nearing eol | 17:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 323284 in hwtest "hwtest installation fails with dapper version of debconf" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/323284 | 17:14 |
| apw | yeah output is mroe important as apport will report failurs for us right now | 17:14 |
| cr3 | sbeattie: I haven't had time to reproduce the problem though, so I don't have a fix | 17:15 |
| sbeattie | cr3: okay, I'll peek. | 17:15 |
| davmor2 | sbeattie: sorry I was off this afternoon so no testing today. Monday was testing day. Iwas busy most days so I have tested just not logged. I'll do that for you after :) Kubuntu and server yesterday ubuntu for bluetooth and installer plus wubi the others | 17:41 |
| sbeattie | davmor2: okay, I was more curious than anything. | 17:42 |
| davmor2 | sbeattie: that should look better :) | 18:07 |
| === fader is now known as fader|lunch | ||
| === fader|lunch is now known as fader | ||
| === fddfoo is now known as fdd | ||
| === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
| === fdd is now known as pricolici | ||
| === charlie-tca is now known as charlie-tca_ | ||
| === charlie-tca_ is now known as charlie-tca | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!