/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/03/08/#bzr.txt

SamBis BZR_PROGRESS_BAR=none working for anyone else ?00:26
SamBit isn't working for me ...00:26
jmlSamB: I've never tried it.00:56
SamBwell, progress bars look really unsightly in emacs buffers :-(00:58
* SamB wonders if he reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/339380 against the correct thing ...01:29
ubottuUbuntu bug 339380 in launchpad-bazaar "push doesn't work when default stacking branch is a mirror that has failed to update ?" [Undecided,New]01:29
SamBum, that's not an ubuntu bug is it ?01:30
SamBit wasn't supposed to be ...01:30
SamBwhere did everybody go?01:32
SamBto bed ?01:32
SamB(because of the DST change?)01:32
jelmerstill here01:33
jelmerSamB, #launchpad is more appropriate for launchpad bugs though01:33
SamBwell, I can't really tell where the bug is ;-)01:33
jelmerlifeless, ping01:44
* SamB wonders if he should report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517770 on launchpad, Debian isn't responding and he has no reason to believe this is a Debian problem ...02:03
ubottuDebian bug 517770 in bzr "bzr: BZR_PROGRESS_BAR is ignored" [Normal,Open]02:03
SamBhuh, that thing is neat02:03
LaserJockSamB: it nows eeeeverything :-)02:12
Peng_mwhudson: If I break the build, you have only yourself to blame. :P02:14
jelmerSamB, I'm pretty sure it's not debian specific02:17
jelmerSamB, just haven't had time to forward it to lp yet02:17
SamBoh, okay, I guess I'll do it then02:18
james_wSamB: I've just done it02:20
james_wbug 33938502:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 339385 in bzr "bzr: BZR_PROGRESS_BAR is ignored" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33938502:20
SamBah, okay, subscribed myself to that02:21
SamBwould it be innapropriate to flag this bug as affecting an emacs-lisp package that runs bzr and expects it to honor that environment variable ?02:25
SamBthe launchpad documentation doesn't seem to be very clear on the intended meaning of "also affects" ...02:26
LaserJockSamB: it would be I think if something had to be fixed in the emacs package in order for it to work02:26
SamBoh, no02:27
LaserJockso I would think in this case it wouldn't be appropriate02:27
SamBbut if the package had users, wouldn't it be nice to be able to somehow indicate that this bug would affect that package, so that they wouldn't file a bug against it?02:29
SamBbut I guess that's more of a launchpad question ...02:29
LaserJockwell, it might yes, but it would sort of depend on if that's likely02:29
LaserJocklike take a bug in grep. you're not going to add an "Also affects" to every program that uses grep02:30
SamBwell, no ;-)02:30
SamBbut it's very likely that this particular bug will affect anyone using this emacs package on its own code ...02:31
* SamB wonders when the bug occured02:32
SamB(that's how I found it; I initially reported it against the elisp package only to discover that it *was* setting the env var but that wasn't working)02:34
LaserJockthen what you'd normally do is mark the elisp package task as "Invalid" and do "Also affects" for bzr02:36
* SamB decides to update http://bazaar-vcs.org/GitStyleBranches with how it's working for him02:36
SamBthat wasn't necessary because the elisp package wasn't yet using a bug tracker02:37
* SamB wonders why in the world MoinMoin has markup for <h1> ...02:39
ronnyhu?02:40
ronnyits a wiki02:40
SamByes, but the H1 should come from the page title02:40
ronnyhmm02:41
ronnyim sure there is some obscure use case that is/was necessary02:42
SamBI've tried to explain the procedure in detail: http://bazaar-vcs.org/GitStyleBranches -- criticism welcome03:33
lifelessjelmer: pong08:22
Spazdoes bzr have a way to copy files?10:37
lukshm, bzr+ssh (push) is doing something stupid. progress bar is on "Transferring:Walking content. 900/995" and it's doing tons of tiny append requests (~300 bytes on average)10:46
luksSpaz: it doesn't10:46
Spaz:(10:46
LarstiQluks: -Dhpss?10:55
LarstiQluks: this sounds a bit familiar, just a sec10:55
luksLarstiQ: how do you know I knew about the append requests? :)10:55
lukss/know/think/10:55
luksand sftp fails with PathError: Generic path error: '51i9iwdq4q7i7h37s2ub.fetch': Failure: unable to rename to '../packs/1735d9ebad85f138adac0df322fbfaf0.pack')10:56
LarstiQluks: so that is how you knew ;)10:56
luksso it's not possible to push this branch to a remote server10:56
LarstiQluks: bug 331823?10:56
ubottuLaunchpad bug 331823 in bzr "Pushing an update of a stacked branch to Launchpad sometimes takes nearly an hour" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33182310:56
luksthere is no stacking involved10:56
LarstiQluks: the title might not be describing the actual problem correctly10:57
lukswell, unless recent bzr is doing something automagically10:57
LarstiQluks: the bug in question is not in 1.12, but was in bzr.dev10:57
LarstiQfwiw10:57
LarstiQif that doesn't work, it is unfortunately something else10:58
luksfrankly, that sftp fails worries me a little more10:58
luksI never had good luck with bzr+ssh10:58
luksthe pack code still hides the actual error, so without hacking bzr I can't even know why it's failing10:59
MarcWeberWhich is the bzr command to find a diff adding or removing a string?11:00
luksbzr doesn't have such a command built-in11:01
MarcWeberluks ? I'd like to know wether there has been a test case containing "stop on never"11:01
MarcWeberSo can't I just export a long list of diffs or such?11:02
luksthere is bzr log -p, but that's probably not released yet11:03
MarcWeberI don't mind installing an experimental bazaar version..11:07
MarcWeberThank you!11:07
LarstiQMarcWeber: you can also use the bzr-bisect plugin11:09
LarstiQMarcWeber: which is a bit more general than what you asked, but can get it done.11:09
MarcWeber:-) bzr -> git would do as well.11:10
luksLarstiQ: I wonder how, you need to check manually whether the string is there or not11:10
LarstiQluks: as the test for yes/no you run 'grep string'11:11
luksLarstiQ: that's O(log N) vs O(1) operation :)11:11
luks(for human work)11:11
LarstiQluks: oh, I use the 'automatic' branch of bisect, where you write the test once11:18
LarstiQOdd_Bloke: merge it allready ;P (I don't suppose you have since recalled what the problem was?)11:19
harobedin bazaar online document, at 5.2.2   Starting a central branch, are there one error in "Here is an example of the second way:" ?11:21
harobedI think last line bzr push sftp://centralhost/srv/bzr/project/trunk isn't useful because second example use checkout11:21
lukslink?11:21
harobedhttp://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/bzr.dev/en/user-guide/index.html#publishing-a-branch11:21
harobedat  5.2.211:22
luksyep, that's wrong11:22
lukscommit will automatically push in this case11:23
harobedÌ happy, I well understand :)11:23
harobedluks: can you fix it ?11:23
luksmaybe, it's been some time since I last sent a bzr patch :)11:24
luksI think the example should use branch, not checkout11:24
luksbecause checkouts are explained later11:24
lukshm, or not11:25
luks"Note that committing inside a working tree created using the checkout command implicitly commits the content to the central location as well as locally."11:25
harobedyes11:25
harobedI think we must delete push line11:25
luksyep11:25
harobedluks: you send the patch ?11:29
harobedor I do ?11:29
luksalready sending it11:30
harobedgreat ;)11:30
luksor do you want to? :)11:30
harobedno, I'm continuing Bazaar user guide reading...11:39
lifelessright, BB mail-bombed:)11:39
=== montywi|weekend is now known as montywi
Odd_BlokeLarstiQ: I haven't, and I don't really have time to check whether it's a major issue or not.12:42
=== radix` is now known as radix
awilkinsjelmer: Ping?16:46
jelmerawilkins, pong16:47
awilkinsjelmer: Are you interested in public SVN repos that cause tracebacks in bzr-svn?16:47
jelmerawilkins, yes, very much so16:47
awilkinsjelmer: The MythTV SVN causes an AssertionError on both a branch and the trunk16:48
jelmerawilkins, URL ? :-)16:48
awilkinsjelmer: I can pack up the repo I have for you to save you some time if you want16:48
awilkinshttp://svn.mythtv.org/svn/branches/release-0-21-fixes16:48
awilkinsIt's a /trunk , /tags , /branches  layout16:48
awilkinsTraceback at  http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/128387/16:50
awilkinsls16:51
jelmerawilkins, when does it break exactly?16:52
jelmerduring the copying phase?16:52
awilkinsCopying revisions16:53
awilkinsHmm, don't need "obsolete packs" do we16:53
jelmerawilkins, around which revision?16:54
jelmerI'm at 800 now16:54
awilkinsAround 1500016:55
awilkinsI was bandwidth bound here, but I don't know which end16:55
awilkinsI suspect mine though, only 2mbit16:55
awilkinsUsing 1.9-rich-root16:56
awilkinsAs I recall it identifies about 20,000 revisions to copy, and when you try again after it breaks, it has about 4,000 left16:59
awilkinsUploading my repo (178MB in an archive) would probably take longer than you downloading at your end :-)17:00
jelmerawilkins, I don't get impressive results here either, it seems mainly restricted by the CPU in the server and the latency17:02
jelmerhi weigon17:02
weigonhi17:03
rockyheyo jelmer17:03
jelmerhey rocky17:03
rockyjelmer: don't suppose you've had a chance to try out my branch? (no idea if you intend on eventually upgrading your tracbzr instnaces)17:04
jelmerawilkins, I think I get ~75k17:04
jelmerrocky, I don't actually have any tracbzr instances running17:04
jelmerrocky, we have one at bugs.bitlbee.org, but I don't have any access to the admin side of things17:04
rockyahhh, gotcha17:04
jelmerrocky, If it fixes any actual bugs (the _get_weave one, right?) and you're confident it works well I'd be happy to review it though17:05
rockyjelmer: well before my changes i couldn't actually browse the repo, got several problems... not sure what you mean regarding _get_weave tho17:07
rockythis is with bzr 1.1217:07
rockyjelmer: i wouldn't care about officially branching off to have a branch to release from that only cares about trac 0.11 and bzr > 1.12 support17:08
rockycould probably get rid of some gunk that way17:08
rockyjelmer: btw, is there anyway to delete a branch from launchpad? i'd like to get rid of my sandbox branch17:11
jelmerrocky, Hmm, what in particular broke with 1.12 ?17:12
jelmerrocky, I think it's possible to remove a branch from lp, not sure how exactly17:13
rockyjelmer: let me switch my branch back to find the original problems17:13
gnomefreakin Hardy i'm getting an error when running bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder=...... its telling me Unable to load plugin 'builddeb' is there a way around this?17:15
rockyjelmer: the _get_weave bug you described... that's because of bzr 1.1217:16
gnomefreakbzr: ERROR: unknown command "bd" is also there17:16
rockyjelmer: which means viewing the revision log for a file broke17:16
jelmerrocky, right17:17
jelmerrocky, Please request a merge of your branch into trunk17:17
rockyjelmer: hm... looks like that bug was reported back with bzr 1.6 ... bug #26330017:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 263300 in trac-bzr "Does not work with bzr 1.6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/26330017:18
jelmeryeah, it's pretty old17:19
rockywow, which is a duplicate of a bug referencing bzr 1.517:19
rockyjelmer: i think i'll do some more research and such before i request a merge17:20
jelmerrocky, more research why ? Because you're not confident your code is right?17:21
rockybecause i just found out some more info on the bug regarding what the code was just trying to accomlish, it's possible i missed something17:22
rockyplus, my branch does more than just fix that17:22
rockyit fixes 1 other thing as i recall and cleans up backend.py for pep817:22
jelmerrocky, generally, please keep separate bug fixes in separate branches17:30
jelmerso they can be merged independently17:30
rockywell, the branch started out as "sandbox" because i didn't know what i was fixing :)17:40
mwhudsonPeng: hi19:05
mwhudsonPeng: "However, if I truncate builtins.py, it can't figure it out." -- if you disable the filename guessing, right?19:05
Peng_mwhudson: Right.19:08
Peng_mwhudson: I'm not sure if I tested it with filename guessing enabled.19:09
Peng_mwhudson: Yeah, with filename guessing, it works.19:11
stefanlsdHow would i revert some changes I did in revision 2.  I am now on rev 13, but just want to drop the rev 2 changes?19:18
LarstiQstefanlsd: obliterate? (harder) or apply a reverse diff? (easy)19:18
LarstiQstefanlsd: bzr merge . -r 2..119:19
LarstiQfor the latter19:19
mwhudsonPeng_: ok19:23
mwhudsonPeng_: land it :)19:24
Peng_mwhudson: Alright. Thanks. :)19:25
mwhudsonthanks for the fix19:25
Peng_:)19:27
stefanlsdLarstiQ: thanks. the reverse diff worked great.19:27
Peng_Done.19:30
lifelessmwhudson: moin19:32
mwhudsonlifeless: hi19:33
=== montywi is now known as montywi|evening
thumpermorning20:05
jelmer'morning lifeless, mwhudson, thumper20:11
lifelessjelmer: what tz are *you* in :P20:22
lifelessjml: https://edge.launchpad.net/testscenarios20:27
lifelessjelmer: you might like current subunit - all the merge requests that were outstanding have been landed :)20:36
awilkinsjelmer: Did your branch from the SVN at mythtv.org reproduce that AssertionError20:38
lifelessradix: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~radix/subunit/report-errors-better/revision/50 ?20:39
lifelessradix: no test for it ? :P20:39
=== arjenAU2 is now known as arjenAU
jfroyjelmer: ping21:02
LarstiQlifeless: I have vague notion in my head that you've done something with testing and resources, is that correct?21:08
lifelessLarstiQ: :P21:08
* LarstiQ wonders how to interpret that :P21:08
LarstiQlifeless: the problem I have is that some tests need different/largish datasets, I'd like the loading of them work irregardless of where you run the test from21:10
lifelessLarstiQ: lp:testresources may match your needs21:10
LarstiQlifeless: kiitos21:10
lifelessLarstiQ: its specifically designed though, for resources that multiple tests need21:11
lifelessLarstiQ: e.g. 'a mysql db' or 'a configured django server' etc21:11
LarstiQlifeless: not too far from what I'm going through21:11
lifelessLarstiQ: there is another project, 'testscenarios' which is closer to regular dependency injection, which is 'run this one test in N different scenarios'21:11
lifelessLarstiQ: high up my TODO list is making these two projects play really well together21:12
LarstiQlifeless: also useful, but not what I'm looking for right now21:12
* LarstiQ had briefly looked at some things on pypi21:12
lifelessLarstiQ: just ping me for any info you want on testresources21:12
lifelessthe api needs a little love at the moment21:13
LarstiQlifeless: will do21:13
=== arjenAU is now known as arjenAU2
=== arjenAU2 is now known as arjenAU
mwhudson  File "/home/mwh/canonical/repos/bzr/brisbane-core/bzrlib/plugins/groupcompress/groupcompress.py", line 753, in get_record_stream21:57
mwhudson    yield FulltextContentFactory(key, parents, sha1, bytes)21:57
mwhudsonUnboundLocalError: local variable 'bytes' referenced before assignment21:57
mwhudsonum, guys?21:57
lifelessmwhudson: that wouldn't seem to work :P21:58
mwhudsonthis was bzr pull ../bzr.dev into an empty --gc-chk255 branch21:59
lifelessmwhudson: intent that line 422:01
lifelessand at the end of the if at line 742 yield a chunked one appropriately22:01
lifelessindent22:01
=== montywi|evening is now known as montywi|zzz
mwhudsonlifeless: i have no idea what "yield a chunked one appropriately" means22:03
lifelessyield ChunkedContentFactory(key, parents, sha1, bytes)22:04
lifelesserm22:04
lifelesss/bytes/chunks22:04
lifelessmwhudson: probably want to drop into pdb once, and check the type of chunks22:04
lifelessif it is a bytestring, just change the variable names22:04
mwhudsonlifeless: seems to be progressing now22:05
lifelessif it is a list, ^^ chunked factory type22:05
mwhudsonwell, to a point, then i got22:07
mwhudsonbzr: ERROR: Revision {('selftest-20050621060616-bb8b5b36e3c950c8', 'robertc@robertcollins.net-20050919060519-f582f62146b0b458')} not present in "<bzrlib.plugins.groupcompress.groupcompress.GroupCompressVersionedFiles object at 0x21d9b50>".22:07
lifelessmwhudson: I suspect you have a very old bzr.dev repo22:15
lifelessthat looks like the issues I was repairing in mine22:15
mwhudsonthere's something about bzr.dev -r 1512 that confuses it22:15
mwhudsonit's fairly old i guess22:15
mwhudsonreconcile time?22:15
lifelessgrab a copy from http://bazaar-vcs.org to /tmp22:15
lifelessreconcile isn't a big enough hammer22:15
mwhudsonor that22:15
mwhudsonok22:16
lifelessbrekfasty things22:20
* mwhudson stabs his isp22:23
mwhudsonlifeless: (when you get back) is lp:bzr repaired sufficiently?22:24
Kobazaww22:30
Kobazbzr diff doesn't take multiple files for arguments22:31
thropehi - I'm having some trouble, runninng 1.12 and bzr-svn 0.5.2 - dont use it much, bt just tried to check the log of NEWS in loggerhead branch, got an error about subvertpy22:40
thropeso I installed subvertpy with easy_install22:40
thropeand now I just get a segmentation22:40
thropeI was hoping bazaar would be getting more stable with the frequent releases after all the trouble i had when starting out with it22:41
thropebut it seems not!22:41
thropewhat can I do to debug a segmentation fault22:41
thropewhen i try to do log on a file22:41
bob2Kobaz: eh, yes it does22:50
throperemoving bzr-svn seemed to fix it - strange that it completely breaks bzr, even on plain bzr branches that having nothing to do with svn22:51
lifelessmwhudson: lp:bzr - dunno22:52
lifelessmwhudson: I'd hope so cause the format change recently was done after repair22:52
lifelessthrope: so bzr-svn sefaulting - please do file a bug on bzr-svn22:53
mwhudsonshould be then22:53
lifelessthrope: as for it affecting to many bzr commands, I've filed a bug on that just recently :), and the next version is somewhat better. It does hook in at a very basic level though which means that early-faults inbzr-svn will show up22:54
thropelifeless: i will reinsall and see if I can reproduce it, but I reading a bit I think it doesn't support python 2.4 which I am on, so perhaps it was that22:55
mwhudsonlifeless: same result with lp:bzr :(22:56
lifelessmwhudson: hmm22:59
lifelessmwhudson: as a hack, set the format._fetch_order = 'topological' in groupcompress23:00
lifelessmwhudson: see if that helps23:00
mwhudsonlifeless: i need more clues than that23:01
mwhudsonah, repofmt.py23:01
mwhudsonlifeless: no difference23:05
lifelesstesting myself23:05
lifelessmwhudson: wherein does it fail?23:06
lifelesslike, revno ?23:06
mwhudsonlifeless: https://pastebin.canonical.com/14704/23:07
mwhudsonit's r1512 that seems to be the problem23:08
mwhudsoni can pull -r 151123:08
lifelessPull phase:Transferring revisions 2200/2242123:08
mwhudsonand then pull -r 1512 fails23:08
mwhudsonlifeless: it fails soon for me then :)23:08
lifelessok23:08
mwhudsonrepository has 2600 revisions23:09
lifelessmwhudson: so, ('selftest-20050621060616-bb8b5b36e3c950c8', 'robertc@robertcollins.net-20050919060519-f582f62146b0b458') is in the source23:12
lifelessmwhudson: and not in the target23:12
lifeless('selftest-20050621060616-bb8b5b36e3c950c8', 'john@arbash-meinel.com-20051123154424-a02f8bf990a1fed5')23:13
lifelessis the text to insert23:13
lifelessI suspect I'll end up hacking deeply on this today :(23:13
lifelessmwhudson: ah23:15
lifeless(Pdb) self.source.has_revision('robertc@robertcollins.net-20050919060519-f582f62146b0b458')23:15
lifelessTrue23:15
lifeless(Pdb) self.target.has_revision('robertc@robertcollins.net-20050919060519-f582f62146b0b458')23:15
lifelessTrue23:15
lifelessI remember this23:15
lifelessmwhudson: for now, use what you've got to play with :)23:16
jmllifeless: thanks.23:16
mwhudsonlifeless: yeah, makes senss i guess23:24
lifelessmwhudson: I've pushed the groupcompress initial bugfix23:25
lifelessmwhudson: wipe out your chk repo23:27
lifelessmwhudson: and apply this:23:27
lifeless--- bzrlib/repository.py        2009-03-07 06:42:07 +000023:28
lifeless+++ bzrlib/repository.py        2009-03-08 23:28:00 +000023:28
lifeless@@ -3381,10 +3381,7 @@23:28
lifeless                         # We don't copy the text for the root node unless the23:28
lifeless                         # target supports_rich_root.23:28
lifeless                         continue23:28
lifeless-                    # TODO: Do we need:23:28
lifeless-                    #       "if entry.revision == current_revision_id" ?23:28
lifeless-                    if entry.revision == current_revision_id:23:28
lifeless-                        text_keys.add((file_id, entry.revision))23:28
lifeless+                    text_keys.add((file_id, entry.revision))23:28
lifeless             revision = self.source.get_revision(current_revision_id)23:28
lifeless             pending_deltas.append((basis_id, delta,23:28
lifeless                 current_revision_id, revision.parent_ids))23:28
* mwhudson tries that23:29
mwhudsonlifeless: it's getting further, at least23:31
lifelessmwhudson: we still have a root bug, I'm not landing that patch as it will potentially make fetches a lot longer, but it will work :)23:33
mwhudsonlifeless: i then got23:38
mwhudsonbzr: ERROR: Revision {('NEWS-20050323055033-4e00b5db738777ff', 'john@arbash-meinel.com-20060920223617-ee51f416037ec263')} not present in "<bzrlib.plugins.groupcompress.groupcompress.GroupCompressVersionedFiles object at 0x1c2dc90>".23:38
mwhudson7600 revs in :(23:39
lifelessmwhudson: grah, I'll run with the change I had you made; but again - use what you have :P23:41
Kobazbob2: no it doesn't23:46
Kobazbudder {~/projects/basePBX/postgres/t} kobaz$ bzr diff *23:48
Kobazbzr: ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: postgres/t/v_cos_includes.pl postgres/t/v_extensions.pl postgres/t/v_trunks.pl postgres/t/v_cos.pl postgres/t/generatePolycomConfig.pl postgres/t/l4p_tests.conf "postgres/t/#v_cos.pl#" postgres/t/v_trunk_groups.pl "postgres/t/#v_extensions.pl#"23:48
Kobazthose files are in the repo... and if i do bzr diff v_cos_includes.pl, it works fine23:48
Kobazand even the help says it takes one file23:48
KobazUsage:   bzr diff [FILE...]23:49
Kobazhmm23:49
bob2Kobaz: because you used *, which your SHELL expands to every random file in that dir23:49
lifelessKobaz: what are you trying to accomplish?23:50
bob2Kobaz: if you did bzr diff onefileinthebranch.pl twofileinthebranch.pl etc it would work23:50
Kobazactually, if i do bzr diff file1 file2, that actually works23:50
Kobazlifeless: do a diff of all the files in the dir23:50
Kobazokay, so it does take multiple files... but it doesn't handle wildcards properly23:50
lifelessKobaz: 'bzr diff .'23:50
Kobazah, that works23:50
bob2Kobaz: your shell handles the wildcards23:51
SamBheh23:51
Kobazwell23:51
bob2"'bzr diff legitfile.pl somefilethatisn'tinthebranch.pl" should file, imo23:51
Kobazapparently there's some difference between bzr diff *, and bzr diff everyfileinthedirectory23:51
mwhudsonlifeless: bzr.dev 2238 seems to be the problem this time23:52
Kobazbecause if i take all the files... and make a list, and send it to bzr diff.. it works fine23:52
bob2Kobaz: you missed a file23:52
bob2Kobaz: e.g. the # backup files23:52
Kobazbut bzr diff * (which in theory is the same thing)... doesn't work23:52
Kobazthat doesn't throw an error23:52
Kobazbzr diff #v_cos.pl#  #v_extensions.pl#  generatePolycomConfig.pl  l4p_tests.conf  v_cos.pl  v_cos_includes.pl  v_extensions.pl  v_trunk_groups.pl  v_trunks.pl23:53
Kobazthat works fine23:53
Kobaz$ echo *                                                                                                                                                   #v_cos.pl# #v_extensions.pl# generatePolycomConfig.pl l4p_tests.conf v_cos.pl v_cos_includes.pl v_extensions.pl v_trunk_groups.pl v_trunks.pl23:53
Kobazthat's the shell expansion23:54
Kobazso... something wiggity is going on23:54
Kobazooooooh23:58
Kobazi see what's going on23:58
Kobazthe error message is wrong23:58
Kobazbzr diff \#v_cos.pl# generatePolycomConfig.pl23:58
Kobazbzr: ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: postgres/t/generatePolycomConfig.pl "postgres/t/#v_cos.pl#"23:58
Kobazit should say : bzr: ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: "postgres/t/#v_cos.pl#"23:58
Kobazbecause the perl script is versioned23:59
mwhudsonlifeless: so using the gc-chk255 format, loggerhead works but is ~twice as slow on most pages23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!