* SamB wonders if he has reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/339380 in the right place | 01:35 | |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 339380 in launchpad-bazaar "push doesn't work when default stacking branch is a mirror that has failed to update ?" [Undecided,New] | 01:35 |
---|---|---|
* SamB wonders a bit about https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/339379 too ... | 01:35 | |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 339379 in launchpad-bazaar "lp: urls are not expanded in the --stacked-on option for push" [Undecided,New] | 01:35 |
savvas | SamB: try #bzr or #ubuntu-bugs if no-one replies :) | 01:37 |
SamB | why #ubuntu-bugs ? I'm on Debian ;-P | 01:38 |
jml | SamB: oh hi | 01:38 |
jml | SamB: so, you don't need to specify --stacked-on to do what you are doing. | 01:38 |
jml | SamB: but the bugs you've reported are definitely bugs, and are in the right place. | 01:38 |
SamB | jml: oh don't I ? | 01:38 |
SamB | #339380 is how I ran into #339379, really | 01:39 |
jml | SamB: ahh I see. | 01:39 |
savvas | SamB: I just recommended alternative ways in case someone didn't reply - which they did :P | 01:40 |
jml | SamB: so, is there a canonical bzr branch for dvc? | 01:41 |
savvas | shouldn't the links be "lp:~naesten/dvc/styleNdocs" instead of "lp:///~naesten/dvc/styleNdocs" ? | 01:42 |
jml | savvas: yeah, but both will work. | 01:42 |
jml | SamB: so, stacking on non-trunk branches is basically not supported on Launchpad right now. | 01:43 |
jml | SamB: we'd like to fix that -- and we will -- but right now the only way to get it to work is really fiddly. | 01:44 |
jml | SamB: 'bzr push --no-stacked' ought to work. | 01:44 |
wgrant | jml: Can't one manually specify http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~path/to/branch URLs to stack on? | 01:44 |
jml | wgrant: one can. I keep forgetting about that, since I work on a proprietary code base, for which that won't work. | 01:44 |
wgrant | Ahhh, true. | 01:45 |
jml | SamB: so, what wgrant said is right. | 01:45 |
SamB | jml: there is a canonical branch, but for some reason launchpad has trouble mirroring it ... | 01:46 |
jml | SamB: it's generating 403s, even in my web browser. | 01:46 |
SamB | jml: that's because you are trying to look at it | 01:47 |
SamB | it works fine otherwise | 01:47 |
SamB | well, except for bzr info | 01:47 |
SamB | see https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/63191 | 01:47 |
jml | SamB: I see. | 01:49 |
wgrant | Why is it 403ing everything unknown? | 01:49 |
jml | SamB: Launchpad inspects the branch before pulling it, because we need to check out some things about the branch before we pull it. | 01:49 |
SamB | wgrant: maybe you should ask that in the question ? | 01:49 |
SamB | Stefan Reichör is the one that runs that server, not me | 01:50 |
wgrant | Ah. | 01:50 |
SamB | do you think that question should maybe be converted to a bug, since launchpad could obviously do with being a bit more articulate about the problem ? | 01:54 |
jml | SamB: I think there are already bugs about error messages there. | 01:54 |
SamB | oh | 01:55 |
SamB | right | 01:55 |
jml | SamB: also I don't understand stefan's comments in that thread | 01:55 |
wgrant | It could also be a bug in bzr. | 01:55 |
wgrant | That it doesn't take a 403 as a failure to get that file. | 01:55 |
wgrant | But I suppose that's not a good idea. | 01:55 |
SamB | well, I mean, launchpad could at least say that something like "bzr info" is failing, or give the URL ... just a thought | 01:56 |
jml | SamB: it's not doing bzr info, it's doing something much more complex | 01:56 |
SamB | yeah | 01:57 |
SamB | thought maybe | 01:57 |
jml | SamB: we are very defensive in the way we pull arbitrary data from user-supplied branches | 01:57 |
SamB | sensible | 01:57 |
SamB | users are always changing things | 01:57 |
jml | or being deliberately malicious. | 01:58 |
jml | although we haven't come across that yet, at least not in the form of a security attack :) | 01:58 |
SamB | well, assuming malice is a decent approximation for all the things users can do by accident anyway | 01:59 |
* SamB wonders if he should report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517770 on launchpad, Debian isn't responding and he has no reason to believe this is a Debian problem ... | 02:05 | |
ubottu | Debian bug 517770 in bzr "bzr: BZR_PROGRESS_BAR is ignored" [Normal,Open] | 02:05 |
james_w | SamB: it should go to launchpad really, apologies for not having done it already | 02:13 |
* james_w does it now | 02:14 | |
james_w | bug 339385 | 02:15 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 339385 in bzr "bzr: BZR_PROGRESS_BAR is ignored" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/339385 | 02:15 |
MTecknology | Ursula-logbot: *tap*tap* | 03:50 |
=== sale_ is now known as sale | ||
terrex | ppa builders for amd64 & i386 seems to be hang | 14:48 |
terrex | ok, now ppa builders are working. | 15:13 |
G__81 | i am new to Ubuntu and am trying hard to become an Ubuntero but i am getting problems | 16:13 |
G__81 | i ve sent the keys to the keyserver and i ve got an email from LP asking me to confirm the key | 16:13 |
G__81 | and it asks me to do gpg --clearsign filename | 16:14 |
G__81 | but when i do | 16:14 |
G__81 | touch new | 16:14 |
G__81 | gpg --clearsign key | 16:14 |
G__81 | it asks me to enter passphrase and after i enter it i get back to the prompt and nothing is written onto the "key" | 16:14 |
G__81 | can someone help me ? | 16:35 |
G__81 | what exactly should i paste in the LP confirmation mail | 16:35 |
SamB | G__81: try pressing ^D | 16:45 |
SamB | oh, wait, you get back to the prompt ? | 16:45 |
G__81 | SamB, ok now finally i ve made it to accept | 16:52 |
G__81 | SamB, i ve got an email from LP saying that my code of conduct has been acknowledged | 16:53 |
G__81 | but my Ubuntero status is still No | 16:53 |
G__81 | :o | 16:53 |
G__81 | yes got it :) | 16:54 |
G__81 | finally | 16:55 |
G__81 | thanks SamB | 17:02 |
nhandler | Could someone here try and reproduce a bug with the PPAs for me? | 17:04 |
hyperair | nhandler: what bug is this? | 17:12 |
nhandler | hyperair: Upload a package to your ppa. Do a search for that package in the web interface. Watch the Build Status column as it goes from needs building to building to complete. For me, once it starts building, I end up with several arch names right next to each other (no space between them). However, if I refresh the page, a space is added | 17:14 |
hyperair | hmmm need to find a package to upload | 17:15 |
nhandler | If I had to guess, this probably is some ajax bug | 17:16 |
hyperair | probably | 17:16 |
fidji | hi | 18:09 |
fidji | somebody can help me in french ? | 18:09 |
fidji | I have some questions about tag revision and ppa | 18:09 |
mib_y16t8vj1 | what's up with staging.launchpad.net? It just doesnt work here | 18:17 |
fidji | I'm on #ubuntu-fr-scripts channel | 18:26 |
mib_y16t8vj1 | doesnt anyone know why staging doesnt work?! | 18:30 |
bcurtiswx | Hi all, im a bug traiger for ubuntu. I'm wondering how possible it would be to gather OS version and package version (depending on a package is provided in the bug report) to bug reports on submit. this i guess would regard the manual submissions, as apport on ubuntu will report this automatically. | 18:42 |
jpds | bcurtiswx: apt-cache policy <package> - shall give you the package version, while uname -a <- OS version. | 18:58 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: yes i do know this. what i mean, is can launchpad be built to do this on submit of bug reports... so this way triagers arent wasting time asking for this information | 18:59 |
jpds | Yeah, you'll have to ask them for manual submissions. | 19:00 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: right now its just a couple of asterisks on the bottom of the submit form.. and people who are just filling in the fields will typically ignore that.. | 19:00 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: since this is important information in bug reports, i imagine having launchpad obtain this information automatically on submit would be extremely beneficial | 19:01 |
jpds | bcurtiswx: Can't see any way of doing that really. | 19:04 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: ok.. the only other idea I had for this.. would be to insert an input field to the bug reports to have the user input OS version and/or package versions | 19:06 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: bug managers like bugzilla gnome have a section devoted to finding version information out | 19:07 |
jpds | bcurtiswx: You might want to file a bug against launchpad-bugs about that. | 19:08 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: ok, i wasn't sure if a bug report was more efficient way to get this addressed. | 19:09 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: for Debian, the canonical method of using 'reportbug' takes care of that | 19:09 |
bcurtiswx | LarstiQ: is there an example i can look at (sorry if this is a dumb question) | 19:11 |
jpds | bcurtiswx: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512694 | 19:13 |
ubottu | Debian bug 512694 in pidgin-facebookchat "pidgin-facebookchat: package should depend on the pidgin package" [Normal,Open] | 19:13 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: is there a way to push that for launchpad bug reports? | 19:14 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: you'll have to have a culture of people using reportbug | 19:17 |
bcurtiswx | hmm | 19:18 |
bcurtiswx | LarstiQ, how similar or dissimilar are apport/reportbug (could they be combined?) | 19:19 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: no clue | 19:19 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: but reportbug is a Debian tool | 19:19 |
jpds | bcurtiswx: Actually, I think https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009-February/000535.html - may just be what you want. | 19:20 |
bcurtiswx | ah yes, package hooks.. i know about those.. but as of right now they need hooks made for tons of other important packages | 19:21 |
bcurtiswx | jpds: this is a good way to grab that info.. but its more after the fact... im going for gathering this information on the initial report | 19:24 |
jpds | bcurtiswx: You're going to have to hope that the user does as requested then :( | 19:25 |
bcurtiswx | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/splix/+bug/338442 | 19:27 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 338442 in system-config-printer "bug reports would benefit from an apport hook" [Undecided,In progress] | 19:27 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: there are different ways people can report bugs | 19:28 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: also, what works for Ubuntu won't for other upstream projects | 19:29 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: so imo you should have your own bug reporting workflow documented anyway | 19:29 |
bcurtiswx | LarstiQ: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug isnt a stellar start to a bug report... and the typical bug reporter wont go to advanced options. Should I file a bug against changing that process around? | 19:33 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: I guess allowing projects to customize the bug reporting a bit might be a good idea | 19:38 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: though I suspect there would already be requests for that | 19:38 |
bcurtiswx | LarstiQ, I love that first option. i think that would be a great thing. In ubuntu, triagers are always asking reporters for package and OS versions... so allowing us to collect that in bug reports that we can customize would be awesome | 19:40 |
bcurtiswx | LarstiQ: how would I go about getting this in the works? | 19:54 |
LarstiQ | bcurtiswx: look through the answers/bugs filed on launchpad for something similar? | 19:56 |
thumper | morning | 20:05 |
=== oojah_ is now known as oojah | ||
technopagan | I'm stuck: I want to upload code to LP/Bazaar. I've tried bzr push lp:MYPROJECTPATH --use-existing-dir while being on my local code-folder, but Bazaar replies that it's "Not a branch". How do I upload code fo the first time? | 21:35 |
lifeless | technopagan: bzr push lp:~USERNAME/PROJECT/BRANCHNAME | 21:36 |
fidji | hi | 21:38 |
fidji | somebody know how I can resole this problem http://paste.ubuntu-fr-secours.org/src-11304 | 21:38 |
technopagan | lifeless: I did that. I get "Not a branch" as an error. | 21:39 |
fidji | resolve* | 21:39 |
lifeless | technopagan: could you please pastebin the exact command and response you get please | 21:41 |
technopagan | lifeless: http://pastebin.com/d2a8d9caf | 21:42 |
technopagan | lifeless: I created a new project, now I want to give it some code so that team-members can start commiting. This should not be that difficult. What am I doing wrong? | 21:44 |
fidji | I need to get the Makefile for my branch in ubuntu-fr-scripts | 21:44 |
lifeless | technopagan: ok, this - bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "/home/baldur/bin/woof/branch/". - says that the local directory you are in is not a branch | 21:44 |
lifeless | technopagan: is this an existing project or a new project? | 21:45 |
technopagan | lifeless: A new project. | 21:46 |
fidji | technopagan: cd myproject && bzr init && bzr add && bzr commit -m "any comment" && bzr push lp:~USERNAME/PROJECT/BRANCHNAME | 21:48 |
technopagan | fidji: Thank you!! | 21:52 |
fidji | nobody for my problem ? | 21:53 |
fidji | http://paste.ubuntu-fr-secours.org/src-11304 | 21:54 |
* thumper looks at fidji's problem | 21:55 | |
fidji | thank's thumper | 21:56 |
thumper | fidji: not sure I'm afraid, I can suggest bigjools or noodles when they come on line though | 21:57 |
fidji | dscverify: loggedfs_0.5-0ubuntu1.dsc failed signature check: | 21:57 |
thumper | technopagan: once the branch is up for your project, you can link it as the primary branch for your project | 21:57 |
technopagan | thumper: I've created a branch, but Launchpad says "A development focus branch hasn't been specified". Is this the same thing? Should I mark my branch the "development focus branch" ? | 22:03 |
mwhudson | technopagan: yes | 22:05 |
technopagan | mwhudson: Done. Thank you! | 22:07 |
* SamB whispers http://bugs.darcs.net/issue833 | 22:07 | |
mwhudson | SamB: in the wrong channel perhaps? | 22:08 |
SamB | no, I was just wondering what that bot would say about it is all | 22:08 |
thumper | technopagan: yes | 22:08 |
thumper | mwhudson: ah, thanks | 22:08 |
thumper | SamB: not much I hope | 22:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!