/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/03/12/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftaJayPee, Mook_sb, stevel: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/songbird-1.1.1.png  thanks for your help guys.00:04
Mook_sbyay!00:05
stevelwoot!00:05
Mook_sbstevel: s/w/p/00:05
* stevel notices missing servicepane icons for SHOUTcast & Concerts00:05
steveldisabled extensions due to update i suppose00:05
JayPeeI didn't you know you guys build with --enable-official00:06
ftayeah, addon updates are damn slow00:06
ftait's a release, not a random snapshot so why not?00:06
ftawe do the same for all products00:07
JayPeebecause it turns on things that don't make sense, and are confusing for users00:07
JayPeei.e. build number, for one00:07
JayPeebut I suspect I'm probably the only one that cares about such things.00:07
ftait's not in the archive anyway so it's still a limited community :(00:07
JayPeefta: yeah; why is that again?00:08
* JayPee forgot00:08
JayPeeXR issues?00:08
ftafor not using the system xulrunner00:08
ftayes00:08
JayPeegotcha00:09
JayPeefta: well, if you use this system, I don't imagine it'll change too much more.00:09
JayPeeso you shouldn't have to fight with it again.00:09
fta? what do you mean?00:09
JayPeefta: earlier, you said "at each milestone, every changes, so i'm back to square one, it's frustrating, at best." I'm saying this isn't slated to change much more, if at all.00:12
stevelfta: i think he means the vendor build stuff... the build system shouldn't be changing00:12
JayPeeso you shouldn't have to spend this much time on it again.00:12
ftaok, good to know00:13
JayPeebut, if you do run into problems, it would be helpful if you filed a bug00:13
JayPeemaybe there are some things we can make easier00:13
JayPeefta: I will let you know now, though, I'm working on a new core build system...00:14
JayPeeso *that's* going to change... ;-)00:14
ftayeah, i know nothing is stable but this package is one of the most complex i ever created00:14
ftamozilla is trivial in comparison00:15
JayPeewhat makes it so complicated for you?00:15
ftaeven chromium, with the same arches, 10 times your number of deps, and >10 times the volume of sources is just a svn co + scons from a running binary nowadays00:16
JayPeethat didn't really answer my question00:17
ftanm, it's been a long day. a 300 lines debian/rules file is not qualified as easy, but i wrote it so i'm partially at fault too.00:19
ftait's 1:20am here00:20
JayPeeheh00:20
JayPeeone of *those* days00:20
JayPeewell, if you want to provide specifics, I will be happy to see if we can address some of them00:20
JayPeeI've already been able to help address some of OpenSolaris' problems00:20
JayPeenot all of them, but some of them00:20
JayPeebut I can't if I don't know about them00:20
JayPeeand I don't follow this channel religiously ;-)00:21
ftai don't have real showstoppers, until now, i managed. it's just that it has so many steps, knobs, env vars, etc, that it's scary for eventual (packaging) contributors00:24
JayPeewell, I think you're complaining about the lack of documentation00:27
JayPeebecause the vast majority of those knobs and env vars exist precisely for packagers00:27
JayPeewell, vast majority is probably an overstatement00:27
JayPeebut many of them00:27
ftado you have a make install now?00:32
JayPeeno00:34
ftathat would sure help00:35
JayPeehrm; does Firefox have one?00:36
JayPee(you should file bugs on things you care about)00:36
ftafirefox, xul, and most moz products have one00:39
JayPeeyes, along with most open source packages00:40
=== asac_ is now known as asac
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/130006/ (with timeout at 4000, and novj novjccomp in /etc/ppp/options - which are apparently ignored)01:40
=== fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp
asacfta: can you please tell me what you have set as APN, username/password for your connection?09:10
ftahi09:26
ftaasac, what do you mean?09:26
asacfta: did you use the broadband wizard?09:28
asacto setup the connections?09:28
asacor are you using "Auto GSM" connections?09:28
asacseems you use auto09:28
asacfta: use the broadband wizard please09:28
asacinstall libmbca0 ... remove your configured connections .... replug the key to make it pop up09:28
ftai don't remember. i think i just plugged the key in, it asks me to unlock the gnome keyring, enter the pin, and that's it09:29
ftaasked09:29
asacfta: yes. seems you didnt install the recommends09:29
asacfta: we ship09:29
asacso you have the auto connection stuff09:29
asacwhich relies on good sim state09:29
asacuse the broadband wizard09:29
ftamy laptop is supposed to have everything installed. i only drop nm on my desktops & servers09:30
asacfta: yes, but seems you didnt install libmbca009:30
asaceven though its recommends of network-manager-gnome09:31
asacfta: install it please09:31
asacthen remove all 3g configureations and use that ;)09:31
asacyour issue is most likely because you have no username/password/APN information in the auto connection ... which then relies on the SIM. we checked reports of users that had the same symptoms ppp-wise and their problem was always a missing APN or username/password09:32
asacits a bit hard to explain why this might go away after some time, but dan said, that can easily happen09:32
ftai always update using apt-get, am i supposed to get recommends that way?09:33
asacfta: only if you never run plain upgrade09:34
asacupgrade deselects recommends09:34
asacthats a bug i think09:34
asacif you use apt-get you must always run dist-upgrade09:34
asacat least to get the recommends ;)09:35
ftadone09:40
ftasame09:40
ftapppd_timed_out()09:40
gnomefreakis there a timer that counts down?09:42
asacfta: the pppd_timed_out is a different issue than what you had yesterday09:44
asacgnomefreak: where?09:45
ftaasac, it's there since i turned the 2000 into 4000 as you requested09:45
gnomefreakasac: in repos. i have only found timers that count up, example: the ones i found you set timer and it starts at 0 and neds at time you set. I'm looking for one ethat when you set it for say 1 hour it starts at 1hr and ends at time you set09:47
asacfta: hmm09:47
asacfta: that is completely unrelated to this09:47
asacfta: where did you add the delay?09:47
asacnot in the udev rules?09:48
ftahm, i don't remember where it was09:51
ftaoh, in /lib/udev/rules.d/77-nm-probe-modem-capabilities.rules09:52
ftathat's what you asked, right?09:53
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/130096/09:55
asacfta: yeah. but that only influences the HAL vs. UDEV detection10:09
asacfta: please look in the connection10:09
asacis there a password/username set?10:09
asacfta: oh. and thats with novj* or did you remove those lines again?10:10
asac(remove them if they didnt help)10:10
BUGabundoasac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/32979810:17
ubottuUbuntu bug 329798 in network-manager "NM will not connect to FON AP" [Undecided,New]10:17
BUGabundoseems to be fixed with lattests NM10:17
asacthanks10:18
asacjust close it then. hopefully it was a driver fix10:18
BUGabundodunno10:19
BUGabundowaiting for someone else to confirm it10:19
BUGabundoit can be just a fluke10:19
BUGabundoor even FON specific10:19
asacBUGabundo: is that a "a", "g" or "n" access point?10:26
BUGabundoG10:29
BUGabundoasac: fta: I have a few apport traces from FF3.1 crashs10:38
BUGabundobut apport will not file them cause they are PPA and not archive10:39
BUGabundodo you guys want me to pastebin / email them?10:39
asacBUGabundo: please retrace them locally11:02
asacand file the good stacktrace11:02
asacthat comes out of it11:03
BUGabundoah?11:04
BUGabundoretrace? how do I do that asac?11:05
BUGabundoapport-retrace maybe?11:05
asacBUGabundo: use apport-unpack11:06
asacrun gdb against the coredump11:06
asacthat gets out of it11:06
asacand get a backtrace that way11:06
asacsorry no time to explain in depth11:06
asacyou need to install xulrunner ... -dbg and firefox -dbg also the dbgsym packages from elsewhere11:07
BUGabundoyeah ... I noticed11:07
BUGabundolet me get those11:07
asac-dbgsym for the depends of xulrunner11:07
asacBUGabundo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Obtain%20a%20backtrace%20from%20an%20apport%20crash%20report%20%28using%20gdb%2911:09
asacits a bit outdated but gives an idea11:09
asacoutdated == the packages listed there are probably not right11:09
BUGabundook11:10
BUGabundothanks11:10
BUGabundoI still think this is the usual one11:10
BUGabundoof opening a new window11:10
BUGabundobut it doesn't happen everytime11:10
BUGabundo480MiBs of dbg packages... xiiii11:12
asacthats how it is ,)11:12
BUGabundoasac: should I change the command to force 3.1, and not 3.0 as default?11:14
BUGabundoany idea why instaling libc6-dbg remove libc6-dbgsym?11:20
BUGabundoNo symbol table info available.11:23
BUGabundohumm11:23
BUGabundowhat did I miss?11:24
BUGabundoasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/130114/11:24
asacBUGabundo: how did you run gdb?11:56
BUGabundoyes11:56
BUGabundoI run the command from the wiki11:56
asacBUGabundo: adapt it for firefox-3.111:56
BUGabundoand just got  http://paste.ubuntu.com/130114/11:56
BUGabundoI did it too11:56
BUGabundoboth ways11:56
asacinstall all the gdbs11:56
asacerr -dbg11:56
asacand -dbgsym11:56
BUGabundothat too11:56
BUGabundoI think11:56
BUGabundoahh ok11:57
asacfor firefox-3.1 and xulrunner-1.9.111:57
BUGabundoon #ubuntu-bugs seb said that (on some cases) both can't be installed11:57
BUGabundoat least for glibc611:57
BUGabundothere are no dbgsym for 3.1 on the daily ppa11:57
asacBUGabundo: xulrunner and firefox have -dbg packages12:02
asacno -dbgsym12:02
asacwe introduced that jsut for that reason12:03
BUGabundoyeah12:10
BUGabundoI know12:10
BUGabundoppas don't build them12:10
BUGabundobut I have all of the dbg install12:10
BUGabundoI think12:10
BUGabundowanna see a dkpg -l to be sure?12:10
BUGabundoasac: ^^^^^12:12
asacBUGabundo: dpkg -l firefox\*12:13
asacBUGabundo: dpkg -l xulrunner\*12:13
asacthats what i want to see12:13
asacand the exact command line you use12:13
BUGabundoasac: trysystem.teste@slavi.com.pt12:20
BUGabundorofl12:20
BUGabundowrong paste12:20
BUGabundohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/130128/12:20
BUGabundohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/130129/12:21
asacand the command?12:24
BUGabundo$ gdb -nx /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -core $TMPDIR/CoreDump -ex 'backtrace full' -ex 'thread apply all backtrace full' -ex 'quit' 2>&1 | tee gdb.log12:27
BUGabundoand $ gdb -nx /usr/lib/firefox-3.1b4pre/firefox-bin -core $TMPDIR/CoreDump -ex 'backtrace full' -ex 'thread apply all backtrace full' -ex 'quit' 2>&1 | tee gdb.log12:28
fta2james_w, i was used to have the build area printed when doing bzr bd --merge -e, useful to go work in build-area. now, it's gone. could you put it back please?15:43
fta2james_w, also, when working on fixing a tarball, i realized that bd no longer takes the tarball in the specified directory if there's one in the build-area dir, even if it's different, it's annoying :P15:45
fta2and confusing15:45
fta2BUGabundo, script -f gdb.log and firefox-3.x -g is what you need16:01
BUGabundocalm down! lol16:01
BUGabundosay again!?16:01
BUGabundofta2?16:02
fta2script to capture everything: man script16:02
fta2and firefox-3.x -g to run it under gdb16:03
fta2while inside script16:03
=== jetsaredim1 is now known as jetsaredim
BUGabundook16:18
BUGabundofta2 I'll get back to you latter16:18
BUGabundodebuging cheese/v4l now16:19
BUGabundofta3 it's the 3rd time today FF crashes on me16:21
fta2hm, 3.2 is very stable for me16:22
fta2both 32 and 6416:22
BUGabundonot today16:25
BUGabundonever have this happen so many times16:25
BUGabundodaily build16:25
BUGabundono new addons16:25
BUGabundothat's why I wanted to provided the trace16:25
BUGabundoto see if its something new or known16:25
BUGabundoentire windows get closed16:26
BUGabundoand other stay working16:26
BUGabundostrange16:26
BUGabundonow that I have a few minutes, fta216:26
BUGabundocan you tell me in baby steps16:26
BUGabundowhat I need to retrace the apport crash for you?16:26
BUGabundoasac is gonna either kiss me or kill me!16:32
BUGabundogonna start a fresh profile on 3.2 and start installing all my addon one by one16:33
BUGabundoand see if I can get read of some of this nasty bugs16:33
asacfta2: i actually asked james_w to add a way to print the used dirs16:34
asacfta2: e.g. gimme tarballs dir, gimme builds dir ... gimme resutls dir16:34
asacfta2: he wont fixed it :/16:34
fta2why?16:37
* BUGabundo because he is a bad bad boy... hit the drums16:42
fta2i think i should roll up my own bd clone, with all i want in it :P16:45
fta2it's supposed to be an helper, not a burden16:54
asacfta2: 308276 ... i asked to reconsider now16:57
fta2bug 30827616:58
ubottuLaunchpad bug 308276 in bzr-builddeb "add option dump user-config directories" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30827616:58
asacanother comnet added16:58
fta2http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23781828/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.firefox-3.1_3.1~b4~hg20090311r23764%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz16:58
fta2why only lpia/jaunty ?? and only 3.1?16:59
fta2asac, btw, prism?16:59
asacon my list.16:59
asacok out to get some food et al17:00
mbanawho builds firefox?  i've got problems with the fonts17:07
mbanait's ignoring my .fonts.conf17:07
asacmbana: ffox 3?17:57
asaci want nfs back18:23
asacplzzzz18:23
asachelp18:23
mbana_asac: yes19:08
asacmbana_: can you test firefox-3.1 please19:10
asacmbana_: which parts of fonts.conf are not honoured? just hinting?19:11
mbana_the default firefox install on ubuntu 8.1019:11
asacmbana_: i know19:11
mbana_sorry19:11
asac;)19:11
mbana_3.0.6 rather19:11
asacmbana_: you should get latest security updates ;) ... 3.0.7 it should be19:12
mbana_http://pastebin.com/d334a7f8619:12
asacbut thats independent19:12
mbana_ignores that19:12
mbana_well, it ignores Arial and Helvetica*19:12
mbana_entire file; http://pastebin.com/d5a286f4519:13
mbana_try it yourself19:13
asacmbana_: ls /etc/fonts/conf.d please19:13
asacmbana_: running gnome or what?19:13
mbana_http://pastebin.com/d18ab9cbe19:14
mbana_yes19:14
mbana_i installed kde briefly but i got rid of it19:14
mbana_it's been like this ever since the install19:15
asacmbana_: i think it doesnt use your fontconfig because it uses the gnome settings19:15
asacmbana_: check preferences -> appearence -> fonts19:15
mbana_firefox?19:15
mbana_but shouldn't it also look at .fonts.conf?19:15
asacmbana_: well. there is a bug that all gtk/gnome apps dont honour fontconfig because gnome forces its settings upon it19:16
mbana_see the problem is; some fonts shouldn't be fully hinted, such as the MS fonts.  they need to be hinted slightly19:16
asacmbana_: firefox-3.1 honours fontconfig and ignores gnome19:16
asac(which is also considered a bug)19:16
mbana_haha19:16
asacmbana_: true. and its on my agenda to get the right fix for 9.1019:16
mbana_how do i get the one that honours fontconfig?19:17
asacmbana_: the gnome font stuff is really amazing. i never dived into fonts until folks complained that firefox 3.1 renders badly (because it used our fontconfig defaults suddenly)19:17
asacmbana_: we currently only have dailies for firefox 3.1 - its still not final19:17
asacmbana_: its quite safe to use ... as it uses a copy of your profile19:17
mbana_ok, do you have instructions for compiling FF?19:17
asacmbana_: in jaunty we have firefox-3.1 package19:17
asacmbana_: i would suggest to use our dailies. otherwise build xulrunner-1.9.1 and firefox-3.1 from jaunty19:18
asacon intrepid19:18
asacor wait19:18
asacfta: do you have milestone builds in your ppa still?19:18
asacfor intrepid/hardy?`19:18
mbana_hold on; are you saying i should use 3.1 from backports?19:18
asacmbana_: no its not in backports. ubuntu mozillateam runs their own archives19:18
asacat least i think its not in backports ;)19:19
mbana_Version 3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1: is the latest19:19
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa19:19
asacthere is 3.1 daily and even 3.2 (trunk)19:19
asac3.1 is more or less at beta state19:19
asacso should be quite bug free19:19
asacextensions might not work19:19
asacmbana_: our packages allow you to run both (3.0 and 3.1) in parallel19:20
asacwithout risking to trash your 3.0 profile19:20
mbana_ok i'll give it a try19:20
asacso we do a copy of your 3.0 profile on first start of 3.1 and when 3.1 becomes default we will ask you which profile you want to continue to use19:20
asacmbana_: yeah. just check if the fontstuff works better19:21
asacmbana_: whether you iuse it later or not is your decision ;)19:21
asaci even run 3.2 dailies here19:21
asac;)19:21
asacand issuse are quite rare19:21
asacmbana_: also if there are regressions in 3.1 over 3.0, we want to know19:22
asacthats why we provide such builds: get testing and get stuff fixed so that 3.1 final is the best firefox release ever19:22
mbana_http://pastebin.com/d3ea296a619:30
mbana_never had that before19:30
mbana_imported the keys19:31
asacmbana_: those should be in there19:31
asacmbana_: if you add the archive to your sources.list and run apt-get install it should work19:31
mbana_deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu jaunty main19:31
asacmbana_: err. you are on intrepid ;)19:31
mbana_i added that19:31
mbana_no ... i thought19:31
asacmbana_: on the ppa page there is a combobox19:31
mbana_ah crap19:31
mbana_thanks19:31
asacmbana_: lsb_release -a19:32
asacthat will tell you what you have ;)19:32
asacmbana_: welcome19:32
mbana_should i close firefox?19:33
asacmbana_: for the very first start that might make sense19:33
asacmbana_: otherwise you dont need to19:33
asacof course depends on the amount of mem available19:34
asac;)19:34
asacmbana_: so maybe you dont have any subpixel rendering except for the stuff you have in your .fonts.conf19:35
asacmbana_: problem is that your config is configured to use no-subpixel19:35
mbana_no i've got it enabled in gnome, it's just that the MS fonts need special care19:35
asacat best run dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config once and select the topmost everywhere19:35
asacmbana_: well. firefox doesnt honour the stuff gnome says in 3.119:35
asacmbana_: so it takes your default conf19:35
asacmbana_: which currently is "no-subpixel" + subpixel for the stuff in your fonts.conf19:36
asacmbana_: but thats really just because your fontconfig-config got stuck at some point at a bad default. we will fix that in fontconfig soon19:36
asacmbana_: the problem is the 10-no-subpixel.conf in http://pastebin.com/d18ab9cbe19:37
asacmbana_: you can remove that manually or run the dpkg-reconfigure from above19:37
mbana_that's reversible right?19:39
asacmbana_: the dpkg-reconfigure?19:39
mbana_yes19:39
asacmbana_: well. it touches 3 files in the confs.d directory19:39
asacmbana_: if you select the topmost its what you always want19:39
asacmbana_: your current state is best described in "trapped in some old state" ;)19:39
asacmbana_: reverting is only possible by selecting the same values you now have there ... but doing so will revert19:40
asacmbana_: otherwise just move the 10-no-subpixel.conf away19:40
asacmbana_: actually move all the 10-* links away if yo do that manually. all those will die anyway19:41
asacmbana_: if you see problems in other apps because of that let me know19:41
mbana_http://pastebin.com/de9cbc8619:41
asaci plan to remove them anyway ;)19:41
mbana_after the run19:41
asacmbana_: yeah right. the other 10-* things are hard installed (bad!) ... removing that would help me to debug if there is collateral damage ;)19:42
asaci wouldnt expect it to make a difference. all gtk apps use the gnome settings anyway19:42
asaceverything else will do the right thing depending on monitor and will use your fonts.conf for tweakage19:43
asacunfortunately gtk is used almost everywhere in gnome. so firefox-3.1 is probably the only place to verify that19:43
mbana_is a restart needed after i change .fonts.conf?19:46
asacmbana_: of firefox-3.1?19:47
mbana_yes19:47
asacmbana_: zooming in and out does the trick for me19:47
asacgtk apps (when gtk is fixed) just update instantly19:47
asacbut i dont have the fixed gtk uploaded somewhere19:47
mbana_http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Meet+Hudson check this out19:47
mbana_i'll show you my screen19:48
mbana_http://yfrog.com/0mscreenshotmeethudsonhudp19:49
mbana_look at the fonts on the headlines etc19:49
mbana_perfect cris[19:49
mbana_crisp19:49
asacmbana_: so the vision is that once we have fixed the gtk/fontconfig mess, we will tweak individual fonts and ship sane default config for them in the respective font packages ;)19:49
jnevesasac: which files should I start with for a pt-PT translation of ubufox?19:49
asacjneves: copy the pt-PT tree and translate all19:49
asacjneves: otherwise just work through file by file19:50
asacjneves: you can test by building the xpi using sh build.sh19:50
asacand install it through firefox19:50
jnevesasac: ok - regarding the Tranduzir vs Traduzir in pt-BR - do you need a patch?19:50
asacmbana_: what issues do you see?19:51
mbana_how are the fonts on your machie19:52
mbana_i don't think that anti-aliased19:53
mbana_it's Arial i believe19:53
mbana_or Helvetica19:53
asaclet me check something19:54
mbana_ <match target="pattern" name="family" >19:55
mbana_  <test name="family" qual="any" >19:55
mbana_   <string>Arial</string>19:55
mbana_  </test>19:55
mbana_  <edit mode="assign" name="family" >19:55
mbana_   <!-- Other choices - Andale Mono, Courier New, Luxi Mono, Bitstream Vera Sans Mono -->19:55
mbana_   <string>Tahoma</string>19:55
mbana_  </edit>19:55
mbana_ </match>19:55
mbana_that's also ignored19:55
mbana_it works fine in gedit19:55
mbana_i'll take a snapshot of the two side-by-side19:55
mbana_it replaces Arial with Tahoma19:56
asacmbana_: are those ttf fonts?19:56
mbana_for sure19:56
asacmbana_: i am not really sure. i dont use windows fonts19:56
asacmbana_: ok so autohinting makes sense19:57
asacmbana_: hmm19:57
asacmbana_: here it reads: "for bitstream vera and most microsoft fonts you should native hinting" (e.g. not autohinting)19:57
asacmbana_: so remove the autohint stuff from your fonts.conf19:58
mbana_  <edit mode="assign" name="autohint" >19:58
mbana_   <bool>false</bool>19:58
mbana_  </edit>19:58
asacmbana_: yes. the one you pasted had true19:58
mbana_do you have a site of-hand that uses Arial19:58
asacmbana_: just remove it completely19:58
mbana_ok i'll try again19:58
asacmbana_: also you shouldnt need the rgba thing. thats autodetected from monitor20:00
asacmbana_: same for antialias i would think and hinting. so just hintslight20:00
asacas hintstyle is thing you want to change for the fonts in question, right?20:01
mbana_do you know of a site using Arial20:04
asacno clue ;)20:04
mbana_about:config doesn't have an anti aliasing options does it?20:05
asacmbana_: no20:05
asacmbana_: so now there is no antialiasing?20:05
mbana_my font config must be a mess20:05
mbana_too much stuff20:06
asacmbana_: what is "your font config"?20:06
asaci would think its just .fonts.conf20:06
mbana_.fonts.confg20:06
mbana_conf20:06
asacmbana_: how does it look now?20:06
mbana_this is best illustrated via an example20:07
mbana_it's pointless for me to explain20:07
mbana_because the difference is huge20:07
mbana_one sec20:07
mbana_ok i tihnk i got one20:08
mbana_oh god20:08
mbana_it's working now20:08
mbana_my eyes :)20:09
mbana_wannan see the differnece?20:09
asacmbana_: hehe20:10
asacmbana_: show20:10
asacmbana_: also post your fonts.conf please20:10
mbana_http://yfrog.com/7escreenshotop20:11
asacmbana_: if they restrict stuff properly for only the affected fonts, please file a bug against fontconfig-config so we can consider that when fixing the font mess20:11
mbana_brb20:11
mbana_thanks20:12
mbana_hold on20:12
asacmbana_: so 3.1 is good and 3.0 is bad in that screen?20:12
asacmbana_: please subscribe me explitily to the fontconfig bug20:13
asacmy nick is asac too in launchpad20:13
mbana_asac: yes20:17
mbana_i love the blur effect20:17
mbana_asac: http://pastebin.com/d1f4291b1.  but i'm still modifying it20:18
asacmbana_: you can also test that stuff with pango-view i would think (use cairo backend)20:19
asacmbana_: e.g. if you want to test specific font20:19
jneves_asac: pt-PT translation available at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubufox/+bug/34193120:19
asacspecific size etc20:19
ubottuUbuntu bug 341931 in ubufox "ubufox doesn't have a pt-PT translation (attached)" [Undecided,New]20:19
asacmbana_: i am mostly interested in getting good per-font tweaks20:19
asacbut i guess you understood ;)20:20
asacmbana_: maybe also depending on the size20:22
asacmbana_: not only for ms fonts, but also for exotic fonts that are crappy on their own ;)20:22
asaclike japanese stuff and so on20:23
mbana_how do i set the font size in pango20:30
asacmbana_: hmm.20:35
asacmbana_: pango-view -t "Blueprints" --font="sans-serif 13.3333px" --backend=cairo20:36
asacmbana_: or pango-view -t "Blueprints" --font="sans-serif 13.3333px" --backend=xft20:36
asacboth should more or less match i would hope20:36
mbana_cool thanks a lot20:43
asacmbana_: i could. but i dont even know in which state my fontconfig is currently ;)20:45
asacmbana_: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/wiki.png20:52
asacnot sure why mind is serif ;)20:52
mbana_http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Meet+Hudson20:52
asacmbana_: thats serif here too20:53
asacmbana_: where did you select sans serif?20:53
asac;)20:53
asacmbana_: ok i had serif for proportional20:55
mbana_never mind20:55
mbana_it's fine20:55
mbana_thanks20:55
asachttp://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/wiki.png20:56
asachttp://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/hudson.png20:56
asaci actually hate serif. so happy that i fixed that now ;)20:56
asacthe "M" is strange20:56
mbana_have you heard of whiptail before?20:57
asacmbana_: its now gone20:57
asaci allowed the website to select their own fonts20:58
asacwithout that i get20:58
asachttp://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/tmp/hudson1.png20:59
asacthat looks good .... not allowing is default. i just accidentially allowed that20:59
asacwhile trying to find the serif reason ;)20:59
mbana_ok brb20:59
mbana_hold on please20:59
mbana_gotta go20:59
mbana_thanks for tghe help20:59
axiakhey! what's the ETA to having beta 3 in your ppa, fta? :)21:03
asacaxiak: use the -daily archive ;)21:03
axiakah, okay21:03
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa21:03
axiakI knew it woud be quick21:03
axiakyeah21:03
axiaki just found it21:03
asacaxiak: its alreawdy ahead21:03
axiakcool.21:04
axiakinstalling now21:04
asacaxiak: but its actually what we want preview users to use21:04
asacaxiak: we get most value out of instant complains when something break21:04
axiakyeah21:04
asacalso you never see stuff that are already fixed upstream21:04
axiakwell I'll be sure to file stuff that seems really broken then21:04
asacand thanks to mozilla doing a great stuff on checkin quality there are not many breaks21:04
axiakyeah21:04
asacaxiak: from -daily you can check here and complain21:04
asacwe will give directions on what next ;)21:05
axiakbtw, I'm so far really impressed by chromium as well :)21:05
axiak(I know it's not the same project, but I just tried it out today as well)21:05
asacaxiak: thats fta ;) ... great work. i havent checked it on 32bits recently21:05
asacadm64 is still a bit messy21:05
axiakyeah21:05
axiakI remember peering into the code on it a few months back21:06
axiakamd64 will take a bit of work...21:06
asacaxiak: well. actually i refer to the 32bit amd64 packages that fta has come up with21:06
axiakyeah21:06
asacaxiak: they try to ship 32bits for amd6421:06
axiakyeah I understand21:06
axiakhuh...21:09
axiak"Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.1b4pre and 1.9.1b4pre."21:09
asacaxiak: you should get a new xulrunner-1.921:09
asacerr 1.9.121:09
axiakk21:10
asacaxiak: didnt you do dist-upgrade?21:10
axiakno I haven't21:10
asacaxiak: you should just use that ;) ... we dont really tweak depends for daily21:10
asacso tracking is best done with dist-upgrade21:10
axiaklast time I did it without being ready bad things happened21:10
axiakbut I won't change the dist this time so I should be fine21:10
asacaxiak: yes. just be sure to look what gets removed21:10
asacbefore you hit enter21:10
axiakyep21:10
axiakjust xulrunner...21:11
axiakno glibc :)21:11
asacyes. thats good to ensure21:11
asacbut xulrunner shouldnt get removed too usually21:11
asacif it gets removed something might be wrong ;)21:11
axiakk21:11
axiakwell all set then :)21:11
asacaxiak: if you dont run jaunty, dist-upgrade should be quite safe21:12
axiakis the version supposed to be 3.1b4pre?21:12
asacaxiak: yes. means you are ahead of b3 ;)21:12
asacsorry for that21:12
axiakyeah that makes sense21:12
axiaka little confusing but happens elsewhere in software21:12
axiak(the "pre")21:12
asacthe versioning scheme is trimmed for humans not computers ;)21:13
axiakyeah21:13
asacbut there are rules ;)21:13
ftaback21:23
axiakdo you guys get occasional seg faults in the new firefox beta?21:34
axiak(on 32-bit)21:34
ftawith 3.2, never, except the crash on exit (visible when you click on a link in another app calling ff, or when you close ff)21:35
axiakhmm21:37
axiaki've been noticing it happens a couple times21:37
asacaxiak: extensions?21:37
ftaif it crashes for you on something else, please install the ff & xul -dbg, run ff with -g, once it crashes, capture a backtrace, then we can see what it is21:37
asacaxiak: are you running in "ignore version stuff" mode?21:37
axiakI think under certain conditions when I use the 3rd mouse button to close a tab21:37
asaci do that all the time. but i should use 3.1 more frequently i guess21:37
asac(also having 3.2 as main thing)21:37
asacaxiak: do you still see that in latest daily?21:37
asacaxiak: can you get a backtrace?21:38
axiakI had extensions installed for 3, but they don't work in the latest21:38
axiakI'm going to enable the debug21:38
axiakand if it happens again I'll come in here with a backtrace :)21:38
asacaxiak: install firefox-3.1-dbg and xulrunner-1.9-dbg21:38
axiakyep21:38
asacthe run firefox in gdb21:38
asacif it crashes give us backtrace21:38
asacwe want to see ;)21:38
asacaxiak: xulrunner-1.9.1-dbg obviously ;)21:38
axiak(Yeah)21:38
asacaxiak: i think plugins dont get disabled by version21:39
axiakhmm21:39
asacaxiak: so you could have a plugin problem (like flash)21:39
axiakoh sorry I meant add-ons21:40
asacaxiak: crashing on close is kind of typical for bad plugins taht keep windows open21:40
axiakthe plugins are installed...could be that21:40
asacaxiak: yeah. i asked for extensions first ;)21:40
axiakyeah21:40
asacbut since you said you dont have them enabled i now would think its plugins21:40
asac(i just closed 200 tabs back and forth in 3.1 without a problem21:40
asac)21:40
axiakyeah21:40
axiakand it doesn't usually happen21:40
axiaklet me see if it happens when I close a flash-enabled site21:40
axiakoh... also flash fullscreen kills firefox21:41
asacaxiak: which flash are you using?21:42
axiakShockwave Flash 10.0 r2221:42
asacare you on adm64?21:42
axiaknope21:42
asacaxiak: my nspluginwrapper r22 build works21:44
asacon youube at least i can view full21:44
axiakmunmap_chunk failed21:48
axiaksaving traceback...21:48
axiakhttp://pastebin.com/m4cebbda621:52
asachmm ... not really much info21:53
axiakyeah21:53
axiakwell above that it's just the threads opening and closing21:53
axiakthen it closes, gets an munmap failure21:53
axiakand kills everything21:53
axiakbrb21:54
axiakback21:55
asacaxiak: try to remove the mstcorefonts22:07
asaci dont think its the problem22:08
asacbut still worht a look22:08
axiakk22:08
asacaxiak: and obviously disabling flash22:08
axiakoh this one is the fullscreen one22:08
axiakI haven't hit the other one yet...22:08
asacah22:08
asacok22:08
asacfullscreen ... still could be fonts, but most likely its driver22:09
asacaxiak: fglrx/nvidia?22:09
asactry free alternatives22:09
axiaknvidia .. yeah22:09
asacati/nv22:09
axiakthough doesn't break in ff 322:09
asacyou never know ;)22:09
asaci would think its fonts22:10
asacwell. think is a bit "strong" ... guts feeling ;)22:10
asacaxiak: also theme is food for weird crashes. for instance the gtkqt engine22:11
asacis known to cause pain. but that should also happen on ffox 3 i guess22:11
asacfta:  are there any plans to split up the chromium svn repo into sensible pieces?22:35
ftai added support for system libs a while ago, it's committed upstream, but it's creating regressions22:35
ftathe effort is to brings features to parity with windows, not packaging, even less system libs22:36
fta-s22:36
ftain short, contributions are welcome, upstream is very friendly even if it's about packaging22:37
asacfta: so what size have the js and the "main" chromium subtree? also what size has webkit subtree?22:37
ftalet me look22:38
ftaasac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium1.png22:51
ftaasac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium2.png22:51
ftaasac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium3.png22:51
asacwebkit is huzge23:01
asacfta: did you managfe to build with system webkit? probably not right?23:01
ftai didn't try, it's tricky, i'm not sure how to handle the webkit port (i.e. the interface written by upstream between chromium and webkit)23:02
ftaehh?? 100MB for lpia?? http://ppa.launchpad.net/fta/ppa/ubuntu/pool/main/s/songbird/23:04
asacfta: is that port in the webkit/ dir?`23:04
asacthe middle-layer23:04
ftad'oh! -rw-r--r-- root/root 428975504 2009-03-12 22:57 ./usr/lib/songbird/xulrunner/libxul.so23:06
ftain the lpia deb23:06
fta430M ?23:06
asaclol23:06
asaci guess songbird has a sever nih syndrom23:07
asacand reinvented a manual buildsystem that cannot cope with unknown archs ;)23:07
ftathat's just jaunty23:07
ftaintrepid and hardy are ~12MB total23:07
asacscary23:08
asacfta: do we have the same problem with jaunty xul?23:08
ftano23:08
asaclooks good23:09
asacfta: hit the "retry" button ;)23:09
ftais it possible for a successful build?23:10
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/ppa/+build/90245223:11
ftaapparently not23:11
asac"... .stabn: description field '.....' too big, try a different debug format23:11
asacsounds suspicious23:11
* asac enables jit for chrome23:14
asacdamn. nopw i get startup hickups23:14
asachmm only from panel23:15
asacnot from cmdline23:15
asacfta: do you use chrome jit too? seems to be quite stable23:15
ftanope, i disabled it a while ago23:16
ftain fact, i had both disabled23:16
asaci hate this startup shit23:16
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/130389/23:16
asaci get that now like enlessly when starting from panel quick launch23:17
asaci always gert that for 30 seconds or so on my laptop23:17
asacbut hereit doesnt happen on command line23:17
asacthats odd23:17
ftawho could have a clue for my lpia weirdness? pitti? doko?23:19
asacfta: retry. if it still happens check wehether those ".stabn" messages are happening elsewhere23:21
asacotherwise point doko at it23:21
asacalso check what compile flags are used23:21
asacand give it to doko23:21
asacotherwise i would think the mobile team has to figure. they are the main driver for that port23:22
asacwould be better if we could reproduce with something more official than sonbird though23:22
ftamaybe songbird is usable on mobile too? :)  no idea what h/w the mobile team is targeting23:24
asacfta: dell mini is lpia23:24
asacfta: lpia is everything atom23:24
ftaoh, so nc10 too?23:24
asacfta: now we also have arm which goes down to cell-phone form factors23:24
asacfta: you can also run i386 on atom processors23:24
ftai guess i should pay more attention to lpia then ;)23:25
asaclpia is basically i586 but with power consumption tweaks23:25
asacfta: yeah ;) ... if you download netbook remix or something its lpia by default23:25
asacso lpia orginated in the mobile team because MIDs that are small handhelds were the first devices using this atom stuff23:26
asacthen atom ws built into bigger systems like netbooks23:27
asacso it basically just became a normal port23:27
asacwhich is directly dealt with by foundations team23:27
asacso hybrid23:28
asaci think the base is foundations team and the special distros for mid and special apps for touchscreen and so on are mobile team23:28
asacfta: anyway, i would really first check what debug flags songbird uses23:30
asacfta: if its reproducible they probably do something weird23:30
asacif it just happened today we should see it for dailies too tomorrow23:31
ftai build xul myself in sb23:31
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/130395/23:32
asacfta: yeah. please test the "retry" button or something then23:33
asaci would hope its just system bustage23:33
asacfta: its -gstabs+23:35
asacnot sure why that is used when linking libxul.so23:35
asaci would think its really songbird crap23:35
asacor we see that tomrrow everywhere ;)23:35
asac(if doko uploaded toolchain stuff and now it sinks to builders)23:36
asacfta: maybe grab the songbird tree for -gstabs+ ;)23:36
asacfta:  grep gstab configure.ac23:39
asac      GCC_COMPILER_FLAGS="$GCC_COMPILER_FLAGS -gstabs+ -O2"23:39
asac    # -gstabs+23:39
asac      GCC_COMPILER_FLAGS="$GCC_COMPILER_FLAGS -gstabs+ -Os"23:39
asac;)23:39
asacpatch that out23:40
asacgo go go23:40
asackill it23:40
asac;)23:40
asacyou can also file a bug against gcc of course ;)23:40
asacand show lpia size and compile messages23:40
asacbut most likely thats not supported on lpia yet23:40
asacand configure should do some tests to check that23:40
ftaiirc, it was there before, and it was fine23:41
asacfta: are there still build logs in jaunty with gstabs+?23:42
asacfor songbird?23:42
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/ppa/+index?field.name_filter=songbird&field.status_filter=any&field.series_filter=jaunty23:43
ftaso http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20598360/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.songbird_1.0.0%2B0-0ubuntu1~fta6_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz23:44
asacyeah23:44
asacinteresting23:44
asacfta: i would try a non gstabs build and if it fixes it we have at least a hint23:45
Nafallogāœ23:54
asacNafallo: is that your fault?23:54
asactest23:54
asacNafallo: what kind of - is that?23:55
asacāœ23:55
Nafallodon't even know what you guys are talking about :-P23:55
asacNafallo: songbirds libxul.so just got 500M in size on jaunty lpia ;)23:55
asac#fail23:55
asacnormal is 8M ;)23:55
Nafalloasac: well... stop sending with your mp3 collection when you upload? :-)23:56
asac-rw-r--r-- root/root 428975504 2009-03-12 22:57 ./usr/lib/songbird/xulrunner/libxul.so23:56
asacfta: ^^ dont do that ;)23:56
ftamy collection is far bigger than that ;)23:56
asacusing libxul.so for sharing warez just isnt right ;)23:57
Nafallofta: aha! you just sent with the latest album your could find... got it :-P23:58
Nafalloprobably Swedish dansband for all I know ;-)23:58
asacmore likely a demo video ;)23:58
asacfor the xul video tag23:58
Nafalloah. and embedding it in the lib itself makes it faster! got it :-)23:58
asacheh23:59
asacyeah. it ships the most popular frames in the average video ;)23:59
Nafalloehrm... why do we ship porn? :-P23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!