[09:32]  * asac still catching up on weekend mail
[13:41] <gnomefreak> i lost 3.2 :( it upgraded and now its gone from menu. ill be back looking fo rit
[13:45] <gnomefreak> found it now to figure out why i had to find it
[14:39] <asac> gnomefreak: did it go somewhere else?
[14:40] <gnomefreak> asac: it was removed from showing in menus. like alacarte removed the check mark
[14:41] <asac> alacarte?
[14:41] <asac> whats that?
[14:42] <gnomefreak> asac: menu editor
[14:42] <gnomefreak> its "main menu" under system>preferences
[14:43] <gnomefreak> who is iGadget :( this is becomeing a round about topic he will NOT win
[14:43] <asac> gnomefreak: what are you talking about?
[14:43] <gnomefreak> brb smoke while i figure out how to explain tb3 not going into HARDY
[14:44] <gnomefreak> i thought my long explaintion would have worked
[14:44] <gnomefreak> for more understanding see bug 317167
[14:44] <asac> shorter is often better to make a point ;)
[14:44] <gnomefreak> im in middle of comment
[14:44] <asac> k
[14:48] <gnomefreak> !sru
[14:49] <gnomefreak> links work :)
[14:49] <gnomefreak> !lts
[14:49] <gnomefreak> damn
[14:49] <BUGabundo> smart bot
[14:49] <BUGabundo> who feeds all that stuff to it?
[14:50]  * BUGabundo offers an icecream to ubottu
[14:51] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: some of the ops. only a hand full of editors for bot
[14:51] <gnomefreak> !editord
[14:51] <gnomefreak> !editors
[14:51] <gnomefreak> cant remember command to show who
[14:51] <gnomefreak> !whoami
[14:51] <gnomefreak> @whoami
[14:52] <gnomefreak> and i meant give links in bug report :)
[14:54] <gnomefreak> cant find lts info on a wiki to better explain this
[15:02] <gnomefreak> there i replied
[15:03] <gnomefreak> how to explain why we wont hardcode an extension into firefox :( people have honestly lost thier minds
[15:09] <BUGabundo> eheh
[15:09] <BUGabundo> what addon was it?
[15:11] <gnomefreak> foi
[15:12] <gnomefreak> doi even
[15:12] <gnomefreak> bug 327185
[15:12] <gnomefreak> hard coding anything to mozilla products are a very bad idea
[15:12] <gnomefreak> IMHO
[15:32] <gnomefreak> thisis a handy link http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions
[16:46] <gnomefreak> bug 343515
[16:50] <gnomefreak> doesn anyone have the master bug for the above bug. I remember it just cant find it
[16:50] <gnomefreak> ok im going to think about lunch andf do lunch its almost 1pm already
[18:14] <BUGabundo> asac: how did you reach that confirmation?
[18:15] <asac> BUGabundo: personal perception ;)
[18:15] <BUGabundo> ahh thought so
[18:15] <BUGabundo> the "confirmed" requires hard data!
[18:16] <asac> BUGabundo: in bugs everybody uses "confirmed" as "me toO" ;) ... so it should work in dents ;)
[18:17] <BUGabundo> eheheheehhe
[18:35] <jcastro> hey asac, new gnome this week won't mean new webkit will it?
[19:01] <kingsqueak> Google calendar authentication with Thunderbird/Lightning/provider seems to have broken in the last few days, anyone know if this is a known issue?
[19:01] <kingsqueak> google cal auth is broken with Evolution as well, 8.04
[19:05] <asac> jcastro: are you waiting on something specific?
[19:22] <fta> hmm, wtf?
[19:22] <fta> asac, did you change xul 1.9.2 ?
[19:22] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23949526/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090316r26232%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[19:22] <fta> why is that fatal now?
[19:22] <fta> oh, nm
[19:23] <asac> fta: dh_install was always fatal for missing files iirc
[19:23] <fta> i 1st thought it was the make check
[19:26] <asac> ;)
[20:01] <jcastro> asac: no I was just thinking, if they bump the webkit in jaunty gwibber will break spectacularly and there's no upstream fix for getting it working with the latest webkit
[20:03] <asac> jcastro: right. i think we are safe as webkit is still not an essential part of gnome
[20:04] <asac> so nothing really should hard depends on it afaik
[20:04] <jcastro> asac: yeah I just saw seb's uploads and they don't bump webkit (whew!)
[20:13] <asac> good
[21:07] <asac> jcastro: do you have a ls /etc/fonts/conf.d/ for me? ;)
[21:07] <asac> (jaunty)
[21:50] <asac> fta: ffox 32 bit package?
[21:50] <asac> fta: do you put .deb's in the sources for your nss 32 bit things?
[21:51] <fta> for chromium?
[21:51] <asac> fta: yes.
[21:51] <asac> fta: i am interested in your experience and how you did it ;)
[21:54] <fta> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/ia32-libs-chromium-browser.head/annotate/head%3A/debian//rules
[21:55] <fta> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/ia32-libs-chromium-browser.head/files/5
[21:55] <fta> basically, i just put some debs in a dir, and the rules file takes care of them
[21:56] <fta> and i also add the missing symlinks
[21:57] <asac> fta: looks reasonable
[21:58] <fta> in comparison, upstream recommends this: http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/src/build/install-build-deps.sh
[21:58] <asac> fta: you put the full debs in bzr?
[21:58] <fta> yes
[21:59] <fta> because the builders can't fetch them at build time
[21:59] <asac> i guess we should look into gathering them on "get-orig-source"?
[21:59] <fta> it's a native package, so no get-orig-source
[22:00] <asac> sounds like it could be a orig as well ... but anyway, get-native-data ;)
[22:02] <fta> yes, it's possible, it's a command vs a manual download
[22:07] <jcastro> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/132210/
[22:08] <asac> jcastro: thanks
[22:40] <fta> asac, lol
[22:40] <fta> dpkg: too many errors, stopping
[22:40] <fta> dpkg: ../../src/packages.c:252: process_queue: Assertion `!queuelen' failed.
[22:41] <asac> heh
[22:41] <asac> thought you found a brekage due to fontconfig
[22:41] <asac> which i apparently causd
[22:42] <fta> no
[22:42] <fta> i'm fighting with my netbook
[22:42] <fta> lpia => failed
[22:42] <asac> fta: NC10?
[22:42] <fta> trying remix now
[22:42] <asac> failed?
[22:42] <fta> yes
[22:42] <asac> fta: lpia remix?
[22:42] <asac> i would suggest to try that
[22:43] <fta> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/jaunty/alpha-6/jaunty-mid-lpia.img => failed
[22:43] <fta> trying http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/jaunty/alpha-6/jaunty-netbook-remix-i386.img now
[22:43] <fta> i wanted to try lpia
[22:50] <asac> fta: mid is wrong
[22:50] <asac> fta: its something different
[22:50] <asac> fta: is there no lpia remix image?
[22:50] <fta> it says "The MID USB image allows you to try Ubuntu without changing your computer at all, and at your option to install it permanently later. This USB image is optimized for handheld devices with 4-7" touchscreens and limited processing power. You will need at least 128MB of RAM to install from this image."
[22:50] <fta> "Low-Power Intel Architecture MID USB image
[22:50] <fta>     For devices using the Low-Power Intel Architecture, including the A1xx and Atom processors. "
[22:51] <fta> i have an atom proc
[22:51] <fta> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/jaunty/alpha-6/
[22:51] <asac> fta: seems lpia is not produced for jaunty
[22:51] <asac> i think stuff moved to x86 kernel
[22:52] <asac> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-netbook-remix/daily-live/current/
[22:54] <fta> i just burned a6
[22:54] <asac> fta: burned? thats a usb image
[22:54] <fta> forgot the quotes ;)
[22:55] <asac> heh
[22:55] <asac> ok
[22:55] <fta> i don't have a cdrom on that box anyway
[22:55] <asac> yeah
[22:55] <asac> fta: do you have a modem installed?
[22:56] <fta> nope
[22:56] <fta> wifi
[22:56] <asac> wifi is obvious ;)
[22:58] <fta> yeah
[22:58] <fta> booting...
[22:58] <fta> in live mode
[23:01] <asac> good
[23:01] <asac> install it ... done
[23:09] <fta> waoww, it's on 'log in automatically' by default
[23:10] <asac> y
[23:10] <asac> nb
[23:11] <fta> beginning install
[23:12] <fta> 1st dual boot in ~13 years
[23:13] <fta> i don't even remember when i last used that dual boot
[23:13] <fta> 40%
[23:14] <asac> you should just wipe win ;)
[23:14] <asac> or wait ;)
[23:15] <asac> you cannot reinstall win
[23:16] <fta> i'll keep it this time, at least until i figure out how to 1/ prevent my 3G key from locking itself and 2/ upload maps into my GPS
[23:17] <fta> 70%
[23:19] <fta> 95%
[23:20] <fta> grub
[23:20] <fta> it's smelling good
[23:29] <fta> wifi ok
[23:29] <fta> sound ok
[23:30] <fta> brightness NOK (X crashed)
[23:47] <fta_> \o/
[23:48] <fta_> damn, it's though to type on this thing
[23:49] <fta_> the <> key is on the other side of the keyboard
[23:49] <asac> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
[23:49] <asac> See `config.log' for more details.
[23:49] <asac> lpia
[23:55] <fta> well, i guess i'll never know 1st hand