[09:26] <lool> Hey folks
[09:26] <lool> -intel fails to build under jaunty ATM
[09:27] <lool> ../../src/i830_quirks.c:248: erreur: ‘QUIRK_BROKEN_ACPI_LID’ undeclared (first use in this function)
[09:27] <lool> This was reported to the list recently too
[09:29] <lool> Since the 4th of March
[09:35] <lool> Reported
[10:57] <lool> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xterm/+bug/343574
[10:58] <lool> Does that ring a bell to anyone?
[10:58] <lool> xterm Xt error: Unresolved inheritance operation
[10:58] <jcristau> never seen that before
[10:58] <lool> It seems the Xt error is a stub which is triggered when something isn't implemented
[10:58] <lool> jcristau: It's likely armel specific
[11:00] <jcristau> i was going to try on agricola when i get some time..
[11:00] <lool> jcristau: Thanks; if you have any idea of how to debug this, I'm interested :)
[11:01] <jcristau> it's Xt. debugging likely to involve drinking.
[11:02] <lool> Argh
[12:51] <lool> jcristau: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23910522/.xsession-errors.1 do you think it could be related to the ICE warnings at the top?
[12:54] <jcristau> no. those probably just mean the kernel's missing ipv6
[19:41] <bryce> booted -ati 6.12.0.  All looks good, uploading...
[23:25]  * bryce waves to tormod
[23:26] <tormod> hi bryce!
[23:26] <tormod> notice we have less than 100 -ati bugs :)
[23:26] <bryce> :-)
[23:26] <bryce> btw I put in 6.12.0 this morning
[23:26] <tormod> and none New-Undecided
[23:27] <bryce> excellent, now to just get them all forwarded upstream
[23:27] <tormod> yeah, I saw that. When do we get the kernel bits? nothing it kernel git so far
[23:28] <bryce> presently, the kernel team is waiting on Alex to send a git branch for ubuntu with the essential drm changes cherrypicked
[23:28] <tormod> nice. good boy alex
[23:29] <bryce> so... hopefully something that can get resolved within the day
[23:29] <bryce> I hope so anyway... we're getting down to the wire
[23:29] <tormod> btw I have a couple of bugs with patches, for savage and i128 (yuck)
[23:29] <bryce> and... in other ati news...  http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/fglrx-8.60.jpg
[23:31] <tormod> seems like i128 never worked in intrepid and Jaunty...
[23:32] <bryce> might be; I've never tested that one myself
[23:32] <jcristau> tormod: people still have that hw?
[23:33] <tormod> apparently :)
[23:33] <tormod> at least two Ubuntu users 
[23:35] <tormod> for Intrepid, SRU will be needed I guess, but the chances of regressions are very small :)
[23:36] <tormod> jcristau: I guess these fixes apply for Debian as well
[23:36] <jcristau> have a link to the bug handy?
[23:36] <tormod> bug #306970 and bug #340750 for i128
[23:37] <jcristau> sounds like server-1.5 bugs :)
[23:37] <tormod> oh the first is only for SRU
[23:38] <jcristau> so if they're fixed upstream i'm good
[23:38] <tormod> the second is not committed upstream, there's a patch in a bug report
[23:39] <tormod> now for savage there is bug 294899, which just needs a cherrypick, or a new snapshot
[23:40] <tormod> then I have a controversial patch for bug 33617 - let PCI be default for savage, since AGP makes so much trouble
[23:41] <tormod> I asked on #xorg-devel last night but nobody cares about savage
[23:42] <jcristau> tormod: mind to file a debian bug for 294899, so i can try to get it in a lenny update?
[23:42] <tormod> jcristau: ok, will do (but not tonight, I need to go to bed like 2h ago)
[23:43] <tormod> bryce: anything else I can do for these bugs? debdiffs?
[23:44] <jcristau> tormod: thanks!
[23:47] <bryce> tormod: debdiffs are almost always helpful
[23:48] <tormod> bryce: for the i128 SRU should it be one debdiff for the two bugs?
[23:48] <bryce> tormod: that'd probably be okay
[23:49] <bryce> tormod: fwiw, today and possibly tomorrow I'm focusing on finalizing package uploads for beta-freeze; after beta-freeze I'll be focusing exclusively on bugs, so assign me any bugs with debdiffs that should go in for jaunty
[23:49] <tormod> bryce: ok
[23:53] <tormod> I got a funny PPA failure now: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
[23:53] <bryce> ouch, that sounds bad
[23:54] <tormod> that is on lpia (the others are
[23:55] <tormod> sorry, amd64 is fine, i386 is waiting
[23:55] <bryce> I've booted both -ati 6.12.0 and the new -fglrx on an R630 card, and it seems to be working.  Now to try my 7xx card...
[23:56] <tormod> bryce: so there will be an fglrx before Beta?
[23:57] <bryce> what I'm testing is non-redistributable, but we definitely have a working -fglrx for jaunty at hand
[23:59] <crdlb> but they're not changing their mind on having no r300-500 driver for xserver 1.6, I assume?