/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/03/17/#ubuntu-testing.txt

aragood morning :-)06:58
Shane_FaganWas evolution removed after an update for everyone?08:45
araShane_Fagan: not me, today's update?08:48
Shane_FaganYep08:48
araShane_Fagan: let me try08:48
* ara installs the latest jaunty updates08:49
Shane_FaganI tried to reinstall it but synaptic said that it couldnt be installed.08:49
araShane_Fagan: btw, we run weekly qa meetings on Wednesday: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings08:50
araShane_Fagan: you should join them08:50
Shane_FaganYep will do08:50
Shane_FaganTotem is also gone08:52
Shane_Faganara: I tried to sudo aptitude install evolution and totem but quits because of unresolved dependencies.08:57
davmor2Morning all safe flight home I take it ara :)09:04
* ara reboots to test updates09:28
araI didn't get the evolution error, but Shane is not longer here to ask for more information09:33
Shane_FaganI can be a little more specific with my problem totems problem is totem-gstreamer: Depends: totem-common (< 2.26) but 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 is installed09:42
araShane_Fagan: I didn't get the evolution problem09:42
araShane_Fagan: which is the output when you try to install it?09:43
Shane_FaganFor evolution its evolution-data-server: Depends: evolution-data-server-common (= 2.25.92-0ubuntu1) but 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 is installed09:44
Shane_FaganAnd for totem its totem-gstreamer: Depends: totem-common (< 2.26) but 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 is installed09:44
araShane_Fagan: output of 'apt-cache policy evolution'09:44
Shane_Faganevolution:09:45
Shane_Fagan  Installed: (none)09:45
Shane_Fagan  Candidate: 2.25.92-0ubuntu209:45
Shane_Fagan  Version table:09:45
Shane_Fagan     2.25.92-0ubuntu2 009:45
Shane_Fagan        500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages09:45
Shane_Fagan        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status09:45
arayour repositories are not uptodate09:45
arado a "sudo apt-get update"09:45
araand then the apt-cache policy again09:45
davmor2Shane_Fagan: You'll probably find that you upgraded during the package upgrade09:46
Shane_FaganSame output as before. Ill wait an hour or two and see if it resolves.09:47
araShane_Fagan: yes, it seems that the ie.u.c archives are not sync09:48
araShane_Fagan: because I get this output:09:48
araara@sushirider:~$ apt-cache policy evolution09:49
araevolution:09:49
ara  Installed: 2.26.0-0ubuntu109:49
ara  Candidate: 2.26.0-0ubuntu109:49
ara  Version table:09:49
ara *** 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 009:49
ara        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages09:49
ara        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status09:49
Shane_FaganIll try the main server.09:49
davmor2Shane_Fagan: try switching to the main server rather than ie and see if that fixes your issue09:49
Shane_FaganThats what I said above09:49
Shane_Fagan:)09:50
davmor2:) just slower than you at typing :)09:50
Shane_FaganUpdates available ie just was out of sync. Must because its st Patrick's day09:51
DisSshaHi !, can i speak with someone who work in SRU ?09:51
davmor2DisSsha: they are mostly in the states so won't really be on till this afternoon.  But speak and see if we can help :)09:52
DisSshadavmor2, ok i need to make or choose a functionnal regression framework/tool, so i scan all existant framework09:54
DisSshafor now, i found Linux Test Project, and in ubuntu -> SRU i think09:54
DisSshaI also found CMake+Darts possibility09:55
DisSshaso, I would like to know how SRU works, if i can create new tests case easily, etc09:55
Shane_Fagandavmor2: Still no evolution or totem. Very strange.09:57
davmor2DisSsha: have you seen this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates09:57
DisSshait"s already in my bookmarks09:57
davmor2Shane_Fagan: Like I say it could be mid upgrade09:57
DisSshabut thanks davmor209:57
DisSsha:)09:57
Shane_FaganI know ill wait and ill stick to the main server because ie isnt quite in sync09:58
davmor2DisSsha: sbeattie is really the guy you would need to talk to who is states side so won't be on for another 6 hours or so09:59
davmor2meh maths has just gone out the window10:00
DisSsha\join #fedora-fr10:00
davmor2DisSsha: try a /10:00
DisSshaok davmor2 thx :)10:00
DisSshayes :) qwerty / azerty switch is boring :)10:01
Shane_Fagandavmor2: I think I might have the answer. I had pre-release updates turned on10:04
Shane_FaganTotem just reinstalled but evolution is still broken. But 1 out of 2 isnt that bad10:05
davmor2Shane_Fagan: Oooops10:05
Shane_FaganAh its always something small that messes things up10:06
davmor2ara: So how were things yesterday10:39
aradavmor2: I was only online at european times, but it went OK. I saw people following teh test cases and asking questions10:40
davmor2ara: Cool :)10:41
davmor2ara: did checkbox get dropped in the end10:41
aradavmor2: yes, because checkbox 0.7 is still in the queue10:43
davmor2Ah okay10:43
* davmor2 away12:04
DisSshaHi, sbeattie here .12:53
DisSsha?12:53
Shane_FaganIs there any reason we should test ext4?12:54
davmor2Did I miss anything reads scroll back14:53
davmor2nope14:53
cr3hey folks, jcastro would like to have AD tests and their results. so, it would be ideal to have those tests structured on testcases.qa.ubuntu.com but how should results be recorded?15:35
cr3schwuk: ^^^15:35
jcastroHi! I am in a position to test likewise-open on a bunch of hardware and configs and would like to start something formal so I can rally community people with AD setups to help test.15:36
cr3jcastro: would it be acceptable to have a test plan on the testcases wiki and have people report bugs for now?15:38
jcastrocr3: whatever would help everyone I guess?15:38
jcastroI've never done this before so whatever you want me to do is fine. :D15:39
davmor2jcastro: you could start with a how-to testcase at http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/System15:39
jcastroyep!15:39
schwukdavmor2: Are we capturing any results in the wiki?15:39
davmor2next would be maybe add it to one of the testing day (every monday)15:39
davmor2schwuk: technically no.  But I setup a table for smoketesting test days to do just that15:40
davmor2jcastro: you could then setup a results page similar to this one http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Plans/SmokeTesting/Results15:41
davmor2schwuk: ^ that should cover it for now shouldn't it15:42
jcastrodavmor2: excellent, that should get me started, thanks!15:44
davmor2jcastro: Try and write step by step too.  Take a look at the installer testcases for examples here http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install15:45
jcastrodavmor2: like so? http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/System/LikewiseOpen15:48
davmor2I just changed to effected package so it tie in with the rest but that seems okay.  You might want to add the fact that you need to click apply to install then on apply again inorder to get it installed15:50
davmor2jcastro: ^15:50
jcastrook15:50
davmor2jcastro: It gives the testcase wider appeal if any one can follow it step by step.  So everything you click list as a step basically :)15:51
jcastrook15:52
jcastrodavmor2: I am away from the AD environment but I will likely work on these every friday15:56
jcastrothis should be enough to get me started though, thanks for the help15:56
davmor2jcastro: np's :)15:56
apwcr3, how is checkbox15:59
cr3apw: schwuk submitted it and I believe it's on pgraner's radar16:06
apwyeah he is keen to make sure it hits, as am i16:06
apwis there a bug for the upload or soemthign?16:06
schwukapw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/34414716:07
ubot4Launchpad bug 344147 in checkbox "Please update Checkbox to latest stable 0.7 in Jaunty" [Undecided,New]16:08
apwwhy do you not do it as a debdiff?16:08
=== fader is now known as fader|lunch
apwschwuk, shouldn't the main sponsors be subscribed to that bug?16:40
schwukapw: If you think they should. The FFE instructions said to subscribe ubuntu-release,16:40
apwahh i see its an ff exception ...16:41
=== fader|lunch is now known as fader
apwschwuk, i just downloaded the tarball as attached to bug #344147, and it doesn't match quite the changelog you have pasted in18:18
ubot4Launchpad bug 344147 in checkbox "Please update Checkbox to latest stable 0.7 in Jaunty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/34414718:18
apwit seems to match the head of the bzr tree, but that has UNRELEASED and my name on it, so i am not sure if the tarball is right or not18:19
schwukapw: The tarball was taken from HEAD this morning, the only difference is I did `dch -r` before bzr export.18:26
apwbut the tarball i downloaded from the bug doesn't have it released18:27
schwukapw: fixed19:14
Shane_FaganCompiz is giving me out an error when I try to enable it.  "/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Error: Could not acquire compositing manager selection on screen 0 display ":0.0"21:10
Shane_Fagan/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Fatal: No manageable screens found on display :0.0"21:10
Shane_FaganAny Ideas?21:10
Shane_FaganIts ok an update fixed it just there.21:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!