[06:58] <ara> good morning :-)
[08:45] <Shane_Fagan> Was evolution removed after an update for everyone?
[08:48] <ara> Shane_Fagan: not me, today's update?
[08:48] <Shane_Fagan> Yep
[08:48] <ara> Shane_Fagan: let me try
[08:49]  * ara installs the latest jaunty updates
[08:49] <Shane_Fagan> I tried to reinstall it but synaptic said that it couldnt be installed.
[08:50] <ara> Shane_Fagan: btw, we run weekly qa meetings on Wednesday: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings
[08:50] <ara> Shane_Fagan: you should join them
[08:50] <Shane_Fagan> Yep will do
[08:52] <Shane_Fagan> Totem is also gone
[08:57] <Shane_Fagan> ara: I tried to sudo aptitude install evolution and totem but quits because of unresolved dependencies.
[09:04] <davmor2> Morning all safe flight home I take it ara :)
[09:28]  * ara reboots to test updates
[09:33] <ara> I didn't get the evolution error, but Shane is not longer here to ask for more information
[09:42] <Shane_Fagan> I can be a little more specific with my problem totems problem is totem-gstreamer: Depends: totem-common (< 2.26) but 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 is installed
[09:42] <ara> Shane_Fagan: I didn't get the evolution problem
[09:43] <ara> Shane_Fagan: which is the output when you try to install it?
[09:44] <Shane_Fagan> For evolution its evolution-data-server: Depends: evolution-data-server-common (= 2.25.92-0ubuntu1) but 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 is installed
[09:44] <Shane_Fagan> And for totem its totem-gstreamer: Depends: totem-common (< 2.26) but 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 is installed
[09:44] <ara> Shane_Fagan: output of 'apt-cache policy evolution'
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan> evolution:
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan>   Installed: (none)
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan>   Candidate: 2.25.92-0ubuntu2
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan>   Version table:
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan>      2.25.92-0ubuntu2 0
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan>         500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
[09:45] <Shane_Fagan>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[09:45] <ara> your repositories are not uptodate
[09:45] <ara> do a "sudo apt-get update"
[09:45] <ara> and then the apt-cache policy again
[09:46] <davmor2> Shane_Fagan: You'll probably find that you upgraded during the package upgrade
[09:47] <Shane_Fagan> Same output as before. Ill wait an hour or two and see if it resolves.
[09:48] <ara> Shane_Fagan: yes, it seems that the ie.u.c archives are not sync
[09:48] <ara> Shane_Fagan: because I get this output:
[09:49] <ara> ara@sushirider:~$ apt-cache policy evolution
[09:49] <ara> evolution:
[09:49] <ara>   Installed: 2.26.0-0ubuntu1
[09:49] <ara>   Candidate: 2.26.0-0ubuntu1
[09:49] <ara>   Version table:
[09:49] <ara>  *** 2.26.0-0ubuntu1 0
[09:49] <ara>         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
[09:49] <ara>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[09:49] <Shane_Fagan> Ill try the main server.
[09:49] <davmor2> Shane_Fagan: try switching to the main server rather than ie and see if that fixes your issue
[09:49] <Shane_Fagan> Thats what I said above
[09:50] <Shane_Fagan> :)
[09:50] <davmor2> :) just slower than you at typing :)
[09:51] <Shane_Fagan> Updates available ie just was out of sync. Must because its st Patrick's day
[09:51] <DisSsha> Hi !, can i speak with someone who work in SRU ?
[09:52] <davmor2> DisSsha: they are mostly in the states so won't really be on till this afternoon.  But speak and see if we can help :)
[09:54] <DisSsha> davmor2, ok i need to make or choose a functionnal regression framework/tool, so i scan all existant framework
[09:54] <DisSsha> for now, i found Linux Test Project, and in ubuntu -> SRU i think
[09:55] <DisSsha> I also found CMake+Darts possibility
[09:55] <DisSsha> so, I would like to know how SRU works, if i can create new tests case easily, etc
[09:57] <Shane_Fagan> davmor2: Still no evolution or totem. Very strange.
[09:57] <davmor2> DisSsha: have you seen this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[09:57] <DisSsha> it"s already in my bookmarks
[09:57] <davmor2> Shane_Fagan: Like I say it could be mid upgrade
[09:57] <DisSsha> but thanks davmor2
[09:57] <DisSsha> :)
[09:58] <Shane_Fagan> I know ill wait and ill stick to the main server because ie isnt quite in sync
[09:59] <davmor2> DisSsha: sbeattie is really the guy you would need to talk to who is states side so won't be on for another 6 hours or so
[10:00] <davmor2> meh maths has just gone out the window
[10:00] <DisSsha> \join #fedora-fr
[10:00] <davmor2> DisSsha: try a /
[10:00] <DisSsha> ok davmor2 thx :)
[10:01] <DisSsha> yes :) qwerty / azerty switch is boring :)
[10:04] <Shane_Fagan> davmor2: I think I might have the answer. I had pre-release updates turned on
[10:05] <Shane_Fagan> Totem just reinstalled but evolution is still broken. But 1 out of 2 isnt that bad
[10:05] <davmor2> Shane_Fagan: Oooops
[10:06] <Shane_Fagan> Ah its always something small that messes things up
[10:39] <davmor2> ara: So how were things yesterday
[10:40] <ara> davmor2: I was only online at european times, but it went OK. I saw people following teh test cases and asking questions
[10:41] <davmor2> ara: Cool :)
[10:41] <davmor2> ara: did checkbox get dropped in the end
[10:43] <ara> davmor2: yes, because checkbox 0.7 is still in the queue
[10:43] <davmor2> Ah okay
[12:04]  * davmor2 away
[12:53] <DisSsha> Hi, sbeattie here .
[12:53] <DisSsha> ?
[12:54] <Shane_Fagan> Is there any reason we should test ext4?
[14:53] <davmor2> Did I miss anything reads scroll back
[14:53] <davmor2> nope
[15:35] <cr3> hey folks, jcastro would like to have AD tests and their results. so, it would be ideal to have those tests structured on testcases.qa.ubuntu.com but how should results be recorded?
[15:35] <cr3> schwuk: ^^^
[15:36] <jcastro> Hi! I am in a position to test likewise-open on a bunch of hardware and configs and would like to start something formal so I can rally community people with AD setups to help test.
[15:38] <cr3> jcastro: would it be acceptable to have a test plan on the testcases wiki and have people report bugs for now?
[15:38] <jcastro> cr3: whatever would help everyone I guess?
[15:39] <jcastro> I've never done this before so whatever you want me to do is fine. :D
[15:39] <davmor2> jcastro: you could start with a how-to testcase at http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/System
[15:39] <jcastro> yep!
[15:39] <schwuk> davmor2: Are we capturing any results in the wiki?
[15:39] <davmor2> next would be maybe add it to one of the testing day (every monday)
[15:40] <davmor2> schwuk: technically no.  But I setup a table for smoketesting test days to do just that
[15:41] <davmor2> jcastro: you could then setup a results page similar to this one http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Plans/SmokeTesting/Results
[15:42] <davmor2> schwuk: ^ that should cover it for now shouldn't it
[15:44] <jcastro> davmor2: excellent, that should get me started, thanks!
[15:45] <davmor2> jcastro: Try and write step by step too.  Take a look at the installer testcases for examples here http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install
[15:48] <jcastro> davmor2: like so? http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/System/LikewiseOpen
[15:50] <davmor2> I just changed to effected package so it tie in with the rest but that seems okay.  You might want to add the fact that you need to click apply to install then on apply again inorder to get it installed
[15:50] <davmor2> jcastro: ^
[15:50] <jcastro> ok
[15:51] <davmor2> jcastro: It gives the testcase wider appeal if any one can follow it step by step.  So everything you click list as a step basically :)
[15:52] <jcastro> ok
[15:56] <jcastro> davmor2: I am away from the AD environment but I will likely work on these every friday
[15:56] <jcastro> this should be enough to get me started though, thanks for the help
[15:56] <davmor2> jcastro: np's :)
[15:59] <apw> cr3, how is checkbox
[16:06] <cr3> apw: schwuk submitted it and I believe it's on pgraner's radar
[16:06] <apw> yeah he is keen to make sure it hits, as am i
[16:06] <apw> is there a bug for the upload or soemthign?
[16:07] <schwuk> apw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/344147
[16:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 344147 in checkbox "Please update Checkbox to latest stable 0.7 in Jaunty" [Undecided,New]
[16:08] <apw> why do you not do it as a debdiff?
[16:40] <apw> schwuk, shouldn't the main sponsors be subscribed to that bug?
[16:40] <schwuk> apw: If you think they should. The FFE instructions said to subscribe ubuntu-release,
[16:41] <apw> ahh i see its an ff exception ...
[18:18] <apw> schwuk, i just downloaded the tarball as attached to bug #344147, and it doesn't match quite the changelog you have pasted in
[18:18] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 344147 in checkbox "Please update Checkbox to latest stable 0.7 in Jaunty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/344147
[18:19] <apw> it seems to match the head of the bzr tree, but that has UNRELEASED and my name on it, so i am not sure if the tarball is right or not
[18:26] <schwuk> apw: The tarball was taken from HEAD this morning, the only difference is I did `dch -r` before bzr export.
[18:27] <apw> but the tarball i downloaded from the bug doesn't have it released
[19:14] <schwuk> apw: fixed
[21:10] <Shane_Fagan> Compiz is giving me out an error when I try to enable it.  "/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Error: Could not acquire compositing manager selection on screen 0 display ":0.0"
[21:10] <Shane_Fagan> /usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Fatal: No manageable screens found on display :0.0"
[21:10] <Shane_Fagan> Any Ideas?
[21:14] <Shane_Fagan> Its ok an update fixed it just there.