[00:00] <fta> asac, what should i do once i have lbm installed?
[00:25] <asac> fta: reboot?
[00:43] <fta> done
[00:46] <fta> asac, i still have ath5k loaded
[00:46] <fta> + lbm_cw_mac80211
[00:52] <asac> fta: yes. thats probably the new one then. i think lbm diverts
[00:52] <asac> files
[00:53] <asac> modinfo ath5k will show
[00:53] <asac> version usually
[00:53] <asac> and path
[00:54] <asac> so fta_nano means it works?
[00:55] <fta_nano> http://paste.ubuntu.com/134015/
[00:55] <asac> yeah looks ok i think
[00:55] <asac> especially when it depends on lbm_ stuff
[00:55] <asac> also you seem to be online
[00:55] <asac> which is good ;)
[00:57] <fta> i'll let it online for the night, see if it times out here
[00:57] <asac> yeah
[00:57] <fta> 3.2->3.6 done
[00:57] <asac> ok off
[00:57] <asac> cu
[00:57] <asac> great
[00:57] <asac> i wlll get that tomorrow then i guess
[00:57] <fta> problem is for those who changed their default app
[00:58] <asac> yeah
[00:58] <asac> not a problem for now ;)
[00:58] <asac> better sleep
[00:58] <asac> ;)
[00:59] <fta> yep, you're right
[00:59] <fta> night :)
[01:03] <fta> fta@cube:~/tmp $ dpkg -c ia32-libs_2.7ubuntu4~fta3_amd64.deb | grep canbe
[01:03] <fta> -rw-r--r-- root/root     17924 2009-02-23 13:09 ./usr/lib32/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so
[02:55] <dtchen> fta: if you're on 64-bit, please try http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~dtchen/ and let me know how it fares with PulseAudio
[07:15] <gnomefreak> bug 309655
[07:18] <gnomefreak> asac: if no problems i will have 1.1.15 done in morning sometime. Its 3:18am here
[08:09] <gnomefreak> if someone gets a chance can you give me the link to the normal flash 64bit download (not the tarball with *.so in the name) for some reason i only find the .so tarball
[08:51] <gnomefreak> ok im uploading SM 1.1.15 once built ill push to bzr
[08:52] <gnomefreak> im going to lay down for a bit its only 4:52am and i havent slept at all yet
[08:56] <dtchen> same here!
[08:56] <dtchen> except i'm going to $dayjob now
[08:57]  * asac does a morning upgrade
[09:05] <gnomefreak> ill be back in an hour or 2
[09:34] <asac> gnomefreak: good. i am still in and out today
[09:34] <asac> fta: good is that from your archive?
[09:34] <asac> let me check
[09:34] <asac> (ia32libs)
[09:35] <asac> hmm ... upgrade still running
[10:01] <fta> hi
[10:01] <fta> asac, does it work?
[10:03] <BUGabundo> guud morning guys
[10:08] <fta> BUGabundo, are you using my PPA ?
[10:09] <BUGabundo> I guess
[10:09] <BUGabundo> I use a lot of ppa
[10:09] <fta> could you try chromium 64 using the ia32-libs from my PPA?
[10:09] <BUGabundo> I did yesterday
[10:09] <BUGabundo> new version today?
[10:09] <BUGabundo> still trying to download all updates
[10:09] <fta> was it ok yesterday?
[10:09] <BUGabundo> Main is slow, mirror is not uptodate
[10:09] <BUGabundo> it ran
[10:09] <BUGabundo> the front page wasn't very nice
[10:09] <BUGabundo> and as I told you
[10:10] <fta> was it like those screenshots? http://www.stefanoforenza.com/chromium-on-ubuntu-how-to/
[10:11] <BUGabundo> there were a few bugs
[10:11] <BUGabundo> with copy paste too
[10:12] <fta> ok, that's probably not implemented
[10:12] <fta> can you visit launchpad without crashing?
[10:12] <fta> or any https
[10:13] <BUGabundo> yeah that was the front page
[10:13] <BUGabundo> let me just finish updates and I'll test it a bit more
[10:14] <BUGabundo> it open LP
[10:14] <BUGabundo> no prob there
[10:14] <BUGabundo> but starting it from GnomeDO
[10:14] <BUGabundo> opens a gnome-terminal?
[10:15] <fta> yes, to see the not-implemented message, so you know it's not supposed to work
[10:16] <BUGabundo> well just tried another SSL site
[10:16] <BUGabundo> and got a gray screen after acepting the invalid SSL
[10:17] <BUGabundo> open a new tab and now it works
[10:17] <BUGabundo> copy paste doesn't work yet
[10:18] <BUGabundo> [9871:9871:2867452368:ERROR:/build/buildd/chromium-browser-2.0.170.0~svn20090310r11348/build-tree/chromium-browser/chrome/common/temp_scaffolding_stubs.h(447)] Not implemented reached in virtual void TabContents::Focus()
[10:18] <BUGabundo> fta you mean stuff like this ?
[10:18] <fta> yes
[10:18] <BUGabundo> you need this errors?
[10:18] <fta> it's expected, it's far from complete
[10:18] <fta> nope
[10:18] <BUGabundo> ok ok
[10:18] <BUGabundo> its fast but unsable
[10:19] <BUGabundo> I won't advertise it yet
[10:19] <fta> i don't need you to ;)
[10:20] <fta> i'm just looking for feedbacks, like if it's not working at all, or if amd64 is worse that i386
[10:20] <fta> in fact, for janty, i have enough feedbacks, i don't have any for intrepid and hardy
[10:20] <fta> +u
[10:20] <BUGabundo> eheh
[10:20] <BUGabundo> funny
[10:21] <BUGabundo> all crazy beta test ppl are already on jaunty
[10:21] <BUGabundo> Errors were encountered while processing: firefox-3.1-gnome-support
[10:21] <BUGabundo> when do you expect this to clear up?
[10:22] <fta> it fixed here
[10:22] <fta> +'s
[10:22] <BUGabundo> humm
[10:22] <BUGabundo> guess I need a distupgrade
[10:22] <BUGabundo> to force the update in
[10:22] <fta> yes
[10:23] <fta> to drag the new packages in
[10:27] <BUGabundo> done
[10:27] <BUGabundo> let me restart FF
[10:31] <asac> fta: ffox 4.6? let me check
[10:31] <asac> i am utilzed
[10:31] <fta> asac, no ia32
[10:31] <asac> fta: heh
[10:32] <asac> i have to check ;)
[10:32] <fta> i'm running 3.6 since yesterday so it should work for you too ;)
[10:32] <fta> 3.5 too
[10:35] <fta> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/rhythmbox-devel/2009-February/msg00029.html
[10:40] <BUGabundo> I just read it!
[10:40] <BUGabundo> :(
[10:40] <BUGabundo> not that I use it
[10:40] <BUGabundo> but I see users enjoying it
[10:40] <BUGabundo> and its on ubuntu by default
[10:40] <BUGabundo> guess we are going to need a new one for karmic
[10:42] <asac> fta: 3.6 is good
[10:42] <asac> of course i have the "preferred application" issue
[10:42] <asac> imo thats ok
[10:42] <fta> excellent
[10:42] <asac> we should rather submit patches to fix control center to l ook at .desktop files or something
[10:42] <asac> for protocol handers
[10:42] <asac> this hardcoded shit is just from the bull
[10:43] <fta> i agree
[10:43] <kosta> Hi! I'm using a non-debian non-ubuntu distro and would like to build chromium-browser. are there instructions anywhere?
[10:43] <asac> so lets add that to karmic agenda. its probably not the last time startup things have to be renamed
[10:43] <asac> kosta: i guess the official chromium instructions ;)
[10:43] <asac> fta can help
[10:43] <asac> well can point ,)
[10:43]  * BUGabundo removing all ff 3.1 and 3.2 packages
[10:44] <BUGabundo> lets see how that goes
[10:44] <asac> fta: oh. too early. seems i was still running 3.2 ;)
[10:44] <asac> hidden window ahoi
[10:44] <asac> lets check for real
[10:44] <kosta> asac, yeah, the thing is, the official chromium build instructions say "this will not build a browser, but you can watch some unit tests", so i guess its not what i want... (still compiling, though)
[10:45] <asac> kosta: i would think that the unit tests are now extended by a testbrowser that we ship
[10:45] <asac> but fta knows the details for sure
[10:45] <asac> you can also look at the packaging branch
[10:45] <asac> that should give you all info required
[10:45] <kosta> asac, ah, ok. thats nice
[10:46] <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/chromium-browser.head
[10:46] <asac> debian/rules is the point to look at
[10:47] <asac> kosta: with some luck and poking you probably can even use the debian/rules build target ;)
[10:47] <asac> oh. probably not that easy if there is no cdbs ;)
[10:47] <asac> well
[10:47] <kosta> asac, i'll try :)
[10:48] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/w/list
[10:48] <fta> all you need is there
[10:50] <kosta> ah, i just found that my distro supplies a package based on your builds, so i'll try that first
[10:50] <kosta> sorry to have bugged you...
[10:50] <fta> which distro is that?
[10:51] <kosta> arch linux
[10:51] <fta> hm, ok, didn't know they were using my stuff, cool
[10:51] <kosta> they got a nice system in place for the community to supply inofficial packages
[10:52] <kosta> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24266
[10:52] <kosta> thing is, the "maintainer" has the version from feb 27th, but by changing 3 lines, it becomes the current version :)
[10:53] <fta> license=('GPL') is wrong btw
[10:54] <kosta> whats correct? BSD?
[10:54] <fta> yes
[10:54] <kosta> ok, gonna add a comment
[10:55] <kosta> done
[10:56] <gnomefreak> asac: i just pushed 1.1.15 to bzr link is https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/seamonkey/seamonkey-1.1.x-dev
[10:56] <gnomefreak> ill be here for a bit longer i need to get to email today
[10:57] <fta> i have to run, cu later
[11:15] <gnomefreak> ok finishing up hardy and intrepid builds for 1.1.15
[11:33] <asac> fta: did you sponsor Jazzva_ ? thanks!
[11:37] <BUGabundo> guys who was the guy working on gears 64 bit?
[11:46] <asac> hmm
[11:47] <asac> do we still have firefox 2 somewhere ;)?
[11:47] <asac> for jaunty i mean
[11:48] <asac> hmm
[11:48] <asac> so building tbird with cairo would fix the font issues i guess
[11:49] <asac> or maybe not ...
[11:49] <BUGabundo> I wonder if he has packages for ff 3.5/6
[11:50] <asac> its in daily
[11:50] <asac> or you mean tbird?
[11:50] <asac> i dont think they bumped their version to 3.5
[11:51] <BUGabundo> yah
[11:51] <BUGabundo> and it only worked to 3.0
[11:51] <BUGabundo> not on 3.1/2
[11:51] <asac> what worked?
[11:51] <BUGabundo> Gears
[11:52] <asac> hehe ... didnt see your line above ;)
[11:52] <asac> i dont know who is that
[11:52] <BUGabundo> me neither
[11:52] <BUGabundo> need to grep the log
[12:07] <philsf> is there a ppa with ff 3.1 for hardy available for testers?
[12:07] <BUGabundo> fta grr tab mix plus breaks on 3.5
[12:07] <BUGabundo> philsf: there's no longer 3.1
[12:07] <BUGabundo> it has been renamed 3.5
[12:07] <philsf> BUGabundo: well, that explains a lot of the confusion I've been having
[12:08] <philsf> does the team have a hardy version in a ppa?
[12:09] <BUGabundo> let me check the mozila ppa
[12:09] <BUGabundo> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/mozillateam/ppa/ubuntu hardy main
[12:09] <BUGabundo> there's one
[12:10] <BUGabundo> but it still shows old packages
[12:10] <BUGabundo> thje daily has it oo
[12:10] <BUGabundo> *too
[12:10] <BUGabundo> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu hardy main
[12:10] <BUGabundo> philsf: ^^^^^^^^
[12:11] <philsf> BUGabundo: but doesn't the daily means that it's not only the "released" versiones (even beta), but daily vcs builds?
[12:12] <BUGabundo> 3.1/5 is beta 4
[12:12] <BUGabundo> what do you want?
[12:12] <BUGabundo> a stable beta?
[12:12] <BUGabundo> LOL
[12:13] <philsf> lol, a beta is one thing, daily revisions is another
[12:13] <BUGabundo> take it or leave it
[12:14] <philsf> I want the beta releases, do you know where can I get it from an ubuntu source (i.e. not from upstream)?
[12:14] <BUGabundo> it the ppa that I've found having it
[12:14] <BUGabundo> maybe fta ppa has it too
[12:14] <BUGabundo> dunno
[12:14] <philsf> ok, thanks anyway
[12:20] <BUGabundo> asac: I think it was stefanlsd
[12:23] <gnomefreak> install the .deb without adding repo to sources.list
[13:16] <fta3> asac, look nicer now: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[13:16] <fta3> +s
[13:17] <asac> lol
[13:17] <asac> nice number thing
[13:22] <fta3> i should remove the old source packages
[13:24] <c0p3rn1c> oh crap, how do you delete a value in about:config?
[13:24] <fta3> suppr
[13:24] <fta3> well, del
[13:25] <c0p3rn1c> doesnt work here :s
[13:25] <c0p3rn1c> I made a value with network.http.proxy.pipelining"
[13:26] <c0p3rn1c> the quote on the end has to be removed :S
[13:27] <c0p3rn1c> I'll go ask in #firefox
[13:28] <fta3> then edit your ~/.mozilla/firefox*/*.default/prefs.js
[13:28] <fta3> kill ff first
[13:30] <c0p3rn1c> ok thx
[13:38] <fta3> asac, any luck with my ia32libs and your gtk2 /wrt canberra?
[13:42] <fta3> asac, i want to push ia32 to universe asap, please test
[14:07] <asac> fta3: without doubt it should be in there.
[14:08] <gnomefreak> asac: jaunty branch is up to date for 1.1.15 hardy and intrepid i have to change changelog to use *-security
[14:09] <gnomefreak> all 3 build fine :) im just cleaning up the versions on PPA atm
[14:10] <gnomefreak> updating 2.0 when i get home or within a few days
[14:11] <asac> fta3: the gtk fix will take a day or two... have to properly test it
[14:12] <fta3> asac, just want you to test locally that the camberra thing works, so i don't have to do another update in a few days
[14:13] <fta3> asac, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa  better? :)
[14:14] <asac> fta3: well. you have to update if gtk is fixed ... before that you dont need to add it
[14:14] <asac> fta3: so if in doubt leave it out
[14:15] <asac> i had some other issues with the patch i developed ;) ... so i didnt get that far
[14:15] <asac> yes.
[14:15] <asac> fta3: thought you removed all history for 3.1
[14:15] <asac> i would have kept them
[14:16] <asac> at least for a while
[14:16] <fta3> hmm
[14:16] <asac> all seems fine
[14:16] <fta3> oops
[14:16] <asac> i mean the debs are still there
[14:16] <asac> unfortunately we cannot test transition by just apt-get install firefox-3.1 and the dist-upgrade
[14:16] <asac> but tahts ok
[14:17] <asac> its pretty fortunate that the superseeded things dont get added to archive size
[14:18] <fta3> you can apt-get install firefox-3.1, it's a dummy package that will drag -3.5 in
[14:18] <asac> fta3: heh ... yeah
[14:18] <asac> dumb me
[14:18] <asac> i thought we could install the old that way too ;I
[14:59] <fta3> bug 154883
[14:59] <fta3> asac, what do you think of this one, should i add libsmpeg & libmikmod ? or ignore
[15:02] <asac> fta3: we should investigate why libsdk_mixer was added
[15:02] <asac> if there is a valid use case we should add all requirements
[15:02] <asac> unless they come from multiverse
[15:03] <asac> the bug names ia32-libs-sdl
[15:03] <asac> if that exist maybe everything should go there instead
[15:03] <asac> fta3: ask pitti who seem to know why libsdl-mixer didnt need those in hardy
[15:04] <asac> maybe its a bug that those came back
[15:04] <asac> and we should fix that
[16:39] <asac> i was voluntold to stop working for today. see you tomorrow ;) (or probably later as my guts tell me)
[16:41] <BUGabundo> eheh
[16:41] <BUGabundo> have a nice rest asac
[17:08] <fta3> ok, 4th version of ia32-libs in my PPA, it should fix a bunch of bugs for a lot of people
[17:10] <BUGabundo> nice
[17:11] <fta3> if it works, i'll push it to universe tonight
[17:43] <gnomefreak> ok SM 1.1.15 is done hardy intrepid and jaunty if i get back on today i will add -security to the target
[17:44] <gnomefreak> im gone for now
[20:39] <fta> BUGabundo, do you use acroread?
[20:39] <fta> i'm looking for someone to try bug 325098
[20:40] <fta> using the ia32-libs from my ppa
[20:40] <BUGabundo> fta no
[21:01] <fta> dtchen, i see you touched a lot of ia32-libs bugs, i'm currently updating jaunty, do you need something?
[21:02] <dtchen> fta: sorry?
[21:02] <fta> ia32lib?
[21:03] <fta> no, it's not you?
[21:03] <dtchen> i've touched it in the past, yes, but i don't understand "do you need something?"
[21:04] <fta> i see a log of open bugs audio related, so maybe you want me to have a look at some while i'm in it
[21:04] <fta> lot
[21:04] <fta> like bug 154883
[21:05] <dtchen> fta: sure, feel free. i'm knee-deep in linux and pulseaudio ATM.
[21:15] <fta> BUGabundo, same question with skype
[21:20] <BUGabundo> shoot fta
[21:20] <BUGabundo> it was working today
[21:20] <BUGabundo> when I installed it
[21:20] <BUGabundo> some how it was gone...
[21:20] <fta> bug 240666
[21:20] <BUGabundo> haven't tested audio dough
[21:20] <dtchen> be aware that BT headsets and PulseAudio are known broken ATM
[21:21] <dtchen> it's next on my TODO
[21:21] <dtchen> but really, i have to finish hashing out this linux crack
[21:21] <fta> i want to know if i need to add bluez-audio to ia32-libs or not
[21:22] <BUGabundo> back
[21:22] <BUGabundo> as I was saying
[21:22] <BUGabundo> BT headsets haven't worked for me since feisty
[21:23] <BUGabundo> maybe I should try again
[21:23] <BUGabundo> have to remember to take mine home
[21:23] <BUGabundo> its usually in the car
[21:24] <BUGabundo> fta what was that bug?
[21:24] <BUGabundo> the log wasn't saved
[21:25] <fta> bug 240666
 be aware that BT headsets and PulseAudio are known broken ATM
 it's next on my TODO
[21:25] <BUGabundo> ok
[21:25] <BUGabundo> then I can't test it
[21:25] <BUGabundo> LOL
[21:26] <fta> well, i didn't know that when i asked you
[21:26] <BUGabundo> dtchen: btw sound is AWESOME again
[21:26] <BUGabundo> didn't even need to reinstall LOL
[21:26] <fta> asac, bug 325098, it needs your gtk patch if it's really related to canberra
[21:27] <BUGabundo> got it back yesterday morning... then stopped again after the end of the evening updates
[21:27] <BUGabundo> with your kernel it got working again
[21:27] <BUGabundo> humm
[21:28] <BUGabundo> brb going to try to connect a debian on an OLD machine to connect to WPA wifi
[21:28] <BUGabundo> its gonna be nice
[21:53] <fta> ok, acroread works for me, good
[21:53] <BUGabundo> ok
[21:53] <BUGabundo> less one test
[22:04] <fta> bug 277454 now
[22:05] <fta> gasp libpython2.5, that means a whole python2.5
[22:05] <dtchen> have fun with that
[22:06] <fta> BUGabundo, can you reproduce bug 221479?
[22:06] <BUGabundo> checking
[22:06]  * BUGabundo has been ia32libs test monkey
[22:06] <fta> dtchen, i think i will skip some of those bugs, otherwise the src package will grow to 1GB
[22:07] <dtchen> fta: that's fine and highly recommended
[22:07] <BUGabundo> fta is it that small? LOL
[22:07] <BUGabundo> ok skype is running
[22:07] <BUGabundo> I don't get the bug
[22:07] <BUGabundo> what images
[22:07] <BUGabundo> ?
[22:08] <BUGabundo> the avatars?
[22:08] <BUGabundo> I see them
[22:08] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 552414303 2009-03-20 18:07 ia32-libs_2.7ubuntu4~fta4.tar.gz
[22:08] <BUGabundo> eheh
[22:08] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 fta fta 534532696 2009-01-27 03:04 ia32-libs_2.7ubuntu3.tar.gz
[22:08] <BUGabundo> I remember the last big discussion about it
[22:08] <BUGabundo> on devel ML
[22:09] <BUGabundo> about it having  the entire Python 32 inside
[22:14] <fta> BUGabundo, what came out of it?
[22:15] <BUGabundo> bad memory, remember?
[22:15] <BUGabundo> they said that there should be a better option to deal with 32 libs
[22:15] <BUGabundo> on 64 arch
[22:15] <BUGabundo> that it would come to a point that only a few would have BW to upload its source
[22:16] <BUGabundo> and jugging by your current source size
[22:16] <BUGabundo> I understand why
[22:16] <BUGabundo> it will take you a while
[22:16] <BUGabundo> at least it would for me, on 1mb/s up
[22:16] <fta> i upload it to the builders in ~20 seconds
[22:17] <fta> so i don't really mind
[22:17] <fta> i detected even more gaps
[22:17] <fta> libcelt.so.0 dep of libjack.so, libjackserver.so
[22:17] <fta> libsmbios.so.2 dep of libhal.so
[22:17] <fta> libavahi-common.so.3 dep of libpulse-browse.so
[22:17] <fta> libavahi-client.so.3 dep of libpulse-browse.so
[22:17] <fta> libspeexdsp.so.1 dep of libpulsecore.so
[22:17] <fta> liboil-0.3.so.0 dep of libpulsecore.so
[22:17] <Nafallo> worst case I can upload them when I sit on the same switch as the builders? ;-)
[22:17] <fta> libgailutil.so.18 dep of libgnomecanvas-2.so
[22:18] <fta> avahi :(
[22:18] <fta> the rest looks fine
[22:21] <BUGabundo> fta 20 sec? 500 MBs?
[22:21] <BUGabundo> what are you on?
[22:21] <BUGabundo> 100mb/s network?
[22:21] <fta> yes
[22:22] <fta> not at home, obviously
[22:22] <fta> but from where i run my bot
[22:22] <BUGabundo> ahh
[22:22] <BUGabundo> but where is the source? on the bot system? or yours?
[22:23] <fta> in a server
[22:23] <BUGabundo> 'cause if you don't have it there, wouldn't that be like working on LP brz ?
[22:23] <fta> no, to work on lp, you need a local copy
[22:24] <BUGabundo> yeah
[22:24] <BUGabundo> that is what I thought
[22:24] <fta> celt is not in main
[22:24] <fta> gasp
[22:25] <fta> oh, jack is not either
[23:16] <fta> asac_, asac: back?
[23:17] <BUGabundo> naaa
[23:17] <BUGabundo> he abandoned us
[23:17] <BUGabundo> for a night out on the town
[23:51] <fta> ok, i'm done with this beast: http://paste.ubuntu.com/134514/
[23:53] <BUGabundo> let it rip
[23:53] <BUGabundo> and mess our systems
[23:54] <fta> at least, it didn't mess up mine
[23:55] <BUGabundo> nothing can
[23:55] <BUGabundo> you have  a system that dates bacl
[23:55] <BUGabundo> to feisty
[23:55] <BUGabundo> or something
[23:55] <fta> not my x64 boxes
[23:56] <BUGabundo> hehee
[23:56]  * BUGabundo douts feisty and before would run 64b well