/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/03/22/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

gnomefreakever get those feelings a package is going to fail to build? if so how do you get rid of the feeling :(00:05
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: you start building it a 2nd time00:06
BUGabundo1even before 1 is over ?00:06
asacBUGabundo1: so pt folks get sis hardware because of olpc?00:07
BUGabundo1humm00:07
BUGabundo1not quite00:07
gnomefreakBUGabundo1: first time around for this00:07
BUGabundo1that's a short version for IRC00:07
asacgnomefreak: just do different stuff00:08
BUGabundo1long story: students get free/cheap laptops00:08
asacgnomefreak: usually packages dont fail to build if you didnt do anything risky ;)00:08
BUGabundo1some of those are "Magalhaes"00:08
BUGabundo1the OLPC ones00:08
BUGabundo1some a bigger laptops (15")00:08
asacso which distro do they end up using?00:09
gnomefreakasac: pre release is risky all by its self :) but during commit it said 2 files changed they were our files00:09
asacmaybe a special distro just for those laptops?00:09
BUGabundo1and the options are HP, Toshiba, Fujitsu AND Insys... a PT brand00:09
BUGabundo1with SiS based HW00:09
asacgnomefreak: mozilla has high quality of commits. even random snapshot have high likelyhood to build00:09
BUGabundo1those laptops come with Vista and/or CaixaMagica00:09
BUGabundo1let me try to get the site00:10
asacyeah. so CaixaMagica is a special distro for that i guess00:10
asacso seems like its something like guadelinex in spain00:10
BUGabundo1asac: you may remember when I spent two days around one of those InSys to try to get network up00:11
BUGabundo1http://www.caixamagica.pt/pag/a_index.php00:11
asacthe yprobably have a high volume deal with sis and get crappy proprietary drivers from them00:11
BUGabundo1I guess00:11
asacyeah i found that site ... i understood a bit though its not in english00:11
BUGabundo1can we extract it (legally) from the image?00:11
asacBUGabundo1: but yeah. so wait a bit until they get busted00:11
gnomefreakasac: true its just the .prerm and .postinst changed atleast i think those were the 2 files either way it was our files that changed and i didnt touch them00:11
asacBUGabundo1: because sis doesnt come up with new versions of drivers00:11
BUGabundo1source link http://www.caixamagica.pt/pag/b_codg00.php00:12
asacBUGabundo1: then they will learn and either put pressure on sis to upstream their drivers00:12
asacor start using  different hardware vendor00:12
asacusually these kind of cooperations work well in first release cycle00:12
asacbut then when all the hardware is bought and so on00:12
asacthe hardware vendor doesnt provide the updates drivers and finally the notice that they screwed themself00:13
BUGabundo1just today I touched a another one, the user broke the system, booted a daily live usb jaunty00:13
BUGabundo1wifi got IP, but no network00:13
asacthats odd00:13
BUGabundo13G dongle wouldn't connect either00:13
asacif you get an IP it should be good00:13
BUGabundo1tried on my laptop, and nothing either00:13
asacBUGabundo1: well 3g dongle is independent00:13
asacif its not the dongle they delivered00:13
asacBUGabundo1: yeah. as you noted. there could be a regresion on the 3g thing00:14
asacBUGabundo1: but for wifi you need to tell me the chipset00:14
asacdriver used00:14
asacBUGabundo1: what 3g dongle is that?00:14
asace.g. what driver?00:14
BUGabundo1humm I did an lspci -vv00:14
asachso?00:14
asacBUGabundo1: that but more important is lsub00:15
asaclsusb00:15
asac;)00:15
BUGabundo1once I saw SiS  I just told him to reinstall CaixaMaginca00:15
asacBUGabundo1: well. some SiS motherboard stuff is definitly supported00:15
asacif its not a SiS wifi its probably not really related00:15
BUGabundo1not acording to most users on our loco team ML00:15
asacif graphics and stuff works its unlikely to be a SiS thing00:15
BUGabundo1I'll get my hands on one00:16
BUGabundo1and test a daily or milestone jaunty00:16
asacBUGabundo1: yes. get that thing to you00:16
asacand then one can look00:16
asacjust testing somewhere and then reporting wont help00:16
BUGabundo1I think I sent you logs last time too00:16
asacwe need interactive debugging00:16
BUGabundo1yeah00:16
BUGabundo1lert me check loco #00:16
BUGabundo1to see if anyone has one00:16
asaccould be. usually just logs are not really helpful. only in the context of other input they might fill in gaps on uncertainty00:16
asacBUGabundo1: where in pt are you based?00:17
BUGabundo1Porto00:17
BUGabundo1actually 10KMs left... Gondomar00:17
gnomefreakasac: an easy way to find out what -dbgsym packages are needed for an app crash? i need to write up  procedure for tb but i wouold rather not miss any00:18
asaci guess any "roman language" country has a porto00:18
asacso though i think i know it i probably know a spanish porto ;)00:18
gnomefreakyou lied it failed00:18
asacyeah i see gondomar on maps.google.com00:18
gnomefreakdamnit i know why iti failed00:18
asacis porto a nice city?00:18
asaccompared to lisboa?00:19
BUGabundo1I find it so00:19
BUGabundo1much more calm00:19
BUGabundo1lisbon is just crazy00:19
BUGabundo1never stops!00:19
asacsounds like the place i would love to be ;) (crazy, never stops)00:20
asacno seriously. sometimes smaller cities have more charme00:20
asacand are more beautiful00:20
asacusually depends on what the city came from00:20
asacis it an industrial city00:20
BUGabundo1I love the view here!00:20
asacor rather a grown fisher town ;)00:20
asacBUGabundo1: is porto an old city?00:20
asace.g. like 1500 ... or even older?00:21
BUGabundo1good kestion!00:21
BUGabundo1let me check wikipedia00:21
BUGabundo1LOL00:21
BUGabundo1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porto00:22
BUGabundo1"Historic references to the city go back to the 4th century and to Roman times"00:22
BUGabundo1old I guess00:22
BUGabundo1LOLOL00:22
asacgreat00:22
asacif its not too small its probably a great place to be00:23
asacbut doesnt speak for you that you dont even know that you live in such an old city;)00:23
asaceven if one doesnt like history, some local history can never hurt ;)00:23
BUGabundo1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gondomar_%28Portugal%2900:23
BUGabundo12M habitants in Porto I think00:24
BUGabundo1I know the storie! just didn't know how old it was00:24
asaclooks good on wikipedia00:24
asacBUGabundo1: look at sevilles climate table ;) ...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seville00:26
BUGabundo1http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gondomar00:27
asacthe summer average is 10 degree Celcius higher ;)00:27
BUGabundo1119300:27
BUGabundo1yes sevilha is hotter00:27
asacbut seville is so beautiful with so many old buildings. i never really understood how they could built somethingthere00:27
BUGabundo1*we* go there for vacation sometimes00:27
asacbuilding in winter maybe ... but living in summer with work and all is kind of impossible ;)00:28
asacgondomar is too small for me00:28
asac25k folks00:28
BUGabundo1eheh00:28
asacthats like a village00:28
asaceverbody knows you ;)00:29
BUGabundo1yeah not too much life after dark00:29
BUGabundo1just like I like it00:29
asaceven if you dont know them ;)00:29
BUGabundo1actually know00:29
BUGabundo1Gondomar is one of the Biggest places we have00:29
BUGabundo1and one of the most populase00:29
asacbut porto looks good00:29
asaconly thing i really find unfortunate for portugal is that they only have the cold atlantic00:30
asacdefinitly beautiful00:30
BUGabundo1why unfor?00:30
asacBUGabundo1: too cold to sit in there for hours and drink a cocktail ;)00:31
asacgood for the climate00:31
asacon land00:31
asacbut i like water like in the carribean00:31
asacbut maybe i should actually try. i was only once in portugal in the south .. that was in may and i couldnt take a bath because it felt too cold ;)00:32
gnomefreakmozilla 93776 12406500:33
ubottuMozilla bug 93776 in English US "yahoo.com - Several sites, notably yahoo mail, opt out of using password manager" [Normal,Verified: wontfix] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9377600:33
asacobviously better than the baltic sea we have here in germany ;) ...00:33
gnomefreaki really dont like havint to fix it00:33
BUGabundo1asac: water is too cold pretty much all year00:33
asacBUGabundo1: right. thats what makes it unfortunate00:33
BUGabundo1only Espinho and Angeiras have nice water on summer00:34
* gnomefreak hands it to asac when i come to a reasoning why we should fix it00:34
asacBUGabundo1: i would prefer portugal over spain ... but somehow i think the only place i would move to in europe would be barcelona00:34
BUGabundo1that's why ppl go to Algarve00:34
asacbecause of the water ;)00:34
BUGabundo1yes00:34
BUGabundo1its great there too00:34
BUGabundo1loved my summer vacations there00:34
BUGabundo1but Gran Palmas... ui ui00:34
asacBUGabundo1: does portugal have access to mediteraen see?00:35
asacsea00:35
asacjust a tiny bit of algarve i guess00:35
BUGabundo1asac: tiny???00:35
BUGabundo1its the best in all europe!00:35
asacBUGabundo1: hmm. you dont even have access to medditeareanen sea00:36
asaci thought malaga was algarve00:36
asaci guess i confused that00:36
asacBUGabundo1: so algarve is the atlantic where faro is?00:37
BUGabundo1that's already medit00:38
BUGabundo1we wouldn't call it atlantica00:38
BUGabundo1ok... maybe Sagres00:38
asacBUGabundo1: well. medit starts at gibraltar ;)00:39
asaceverything west of that is atlantic00:39
asacbut yeah. i mean even the north sea here between britain and germany is atlantic ;)00:40
asacso yes, there are different names ;)00:40
* asac gets a whiskey to end his day ;)00:44
BUGabundo1Try Vinho do Porto00:48
asacright porto is where the port wines come from00:49
asacbut i dont like those00:49
asacsimilar to how i hate whiskey ;)00:49
asacbut i have this 15 year old thing here and i thought it must be good ;)00:49
asacbut it isnt :(00:49
BUGabundo1I don't drink any alchool drinks00:51
* BUGabundo1 mumbles something for having been ban from #u+1 for much less OT then this last 15 min00:52
asacyou got banned?00:52
asacheh00:52
asacby gnomefreak ?00:52
asac;)00:52
BUGabundo1PVT00:52
gnomefreakby?00:52
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: is coold00:53
BUGabundo1*cool00:53
BUGabundo1don't blame him00:53
* gnomefreak is getting pissed off trying to explain why we dont build with an option that only fixes one fucking domain00:54
gnomefreakbrb smoke00:54
=== ampelbein is now known as Ampelbein
asacgnomefreak: are you working on bugs?00:57
* asac thinks that live without bug processing is much more fun :)00:57
gnomefreaksort of00:58
asacusually its ok if folks dont understand how things go ... but what makes things really bad is when folks think they have the right to disagree ;)00:59
gnomefreaki dont think shipping firefox/seamonkey withWALLET_DONT_CACHE_ALL_PASSWORDS undefined is a good idea only because yahoo opt out of mozilla's option to save or not save passwords00:59
asaci mean of course they have the right to disagree ... but flaming that to the bugs doesnt help anyone01:00
gnomefreakasac: any way that can be changed in about:config?01:00
asacgnomefreak: i dont know what that issue is about actually01:00
gnomefreaki didnt see it01:00
asacyahoo doesnt ask to save password?01:00
asachow do they opt out?01:00
gnomefreakbug 24303701:00
ubottuLaunchpad bug 243037 in firefox-3.0 "password not saved for mail.yahoo.co.jp - request to recompile with WALLET_DONT_CACHE_ALL_PASSWORDS undefined" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24303701:00
asacwow01:00
gnomefreakasac: it was designed for finanatial sites example banks ect...01:02
asaci always thought that wallet is something that isnt even available as a build option in xul 1.901:02
asacits the old thing used by tbird 2 and mailnews01:02
gnomefreakfrom upstream the comment is "The opt-out feature was added to satisfy the strong demands of the financial01:02
gnomefreakcommunity."01:02
asacgnomefreak: yeah. so if upstream wontfixed it01:03
asacwe should wont fix it too01:03
gnomefreaki tried that01:03
BUGabundo1eheh01:03
BUGabundo1funny read01:03
gnomefreakrolf reopend it01:03
asaclet me try again01:03
gnomefreakill think of a way to put it nicely in a few. i already sent one reply but im offline in tb atm01:04
asacgnomefreak: done01:04
gnomefreakthanks01:04
asaclets see what happens01:04
asacok so seems i crashed ffox 3.6 daily finally01:05
asacreally rare for me01:05
asaceven though its trunk daily01:05
* gnomefreak lost train of thought 01:05
BUGabundo13.5 is freezing a lot01:06
* BUGabundo1 knows that asac is going to blame one of the 53 addons01:06
asacheh01:07
asacreally, i would always suggest that you should reconsider your attitude towards addons ;)01:07
asaci cannot really believe that all addons are needed for your daily work ;)01:07
asac"US Nuclear Sub Crashes Into US Navy Amphibious Vessel " <- gnomefreak stop doing that ;)01:09
gnomefreak:)01:10
asachttp://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/21/2227212&from=rss01:10
asacthats really dangerous ;)01:10
* gnomefreak reading01:11
gnomefreakthat is bad01:12
* gnomefreak laughing at The headline should be "US Navy perfects underwater stealth technology."01:12
asaclol01:13
asacits always funny ... all those experts ... like here i read:01:14
asac"You obviously haven't served in the submarine force, have demonstrated zero actual knowledge of how submarines operate,...."01:14
BUGabundo1ROFL01:14
asachttp://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/21/2033211&from=rss i read:01:14
asacUm, what the heck are you talking about? The ARP timeout is two minutes, not twenty. Speaking as someone who's also implemented IPv6 and used it pretty extensively, it sounds like you really don't know what you're talking about.01:14
gnomefreakomg01:14
BUGabundo1asac: not all. that's why some are disable01:14
asacBUGabundo1: ok. i cant see that in the list you submit ;)01:14
BUGabundo1most of them, yes, I enjoy the added features01:15
asacmaybe could be improved01:15
asacBUGabundo1: so how many are on?01:15
BUGabundo1when on vanila FF I miss most01:15
BUGabundo1asac: actually you should01:15
asacif you could assemble a list of "enabled" addons and submit them with bugs i would probably look at them again ;)01:15
BUGabundo1it says DISABLE01:15
asacassuming its not 35 ;)01:15
BUGabundo1http://paste.ubuntu.com/135133/01:15
asacok. thats still 40 on01:15
BUGabundo1eheh01:16
BUGabundo1that's the full list01:16
asacis that what we  ahve in our extensionsummary.txt in the bugs?01:16
BUGabundo1I've been meaning to start a new 3.5 profile01:16
BUGabundo1and install them from fresh01:16
asac"Jaikungfu 0.3.1301:16
asac"01:16
BUGabundo1already got all upstream sites into bookmarks01:16
BUGabundo1yeah that's dead01:16
asacthats probably a candidate i would have never missed nor noticed at any time of my life ;)01:16
BUGabundo1jonas is porting it into jaikuengine01:16
asacwhat is it doing?01:17
asacMr Uptime 0.9.301:17
BUGabundo1http://www.jaiku.com/channel/jaikungfu/presence/903e2cf4de224bcdad5a487dd48ddea201:17
asaci think nobody would miss that either ;)01:17
asac"Netcraft Anti-Phishing Toolbar 1.201:17
asac"01:17
asacwhat does that do?01:17
BUGabundo1actually its quite nice01:17
asacyou feel safer with that?01:17
BUGabundo1when page is down, I get a messge when its back up01:17
asacquite nice doesnt mean its required01:18
BUGabundo1not safer01:18
BUGabundo1don't use it for that!01:18
asaci mean it can allso be nice to have rolling tits on your firefox window ;) that shake when you pull them with the mouse ;)01:18
BUGabundo1I like to see the site origin, date created, server owner01:18
BUGabundo1stuff01:18
asacbut its not really useful ;)01:18
gnomefreakasac: do you have any feelings towards me packaging gnash 0.8.5 for PPA? to see if anything is bad with it? maybe next week ill have time but not putting too much time into it01:18
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: how is flash 64 packing going?01:18
asacgnomefreak: i think i tried it and it built01:18
asacunfortunately i didnt manage to finish it as i got distracted01:19
asacits basically just a merge of the release revision on the packaging branch01:19
asacbumping version in changelog01:19
asacand i think adding one fileset to the .install files of gnash-common01:19
gnomefreakBUGabundo1: its not i cant find upstream source nor md5sum and i would have to set up a qmenu and im not looking forward to that at this time01:19
BUGabundo1okay01:20
asacRemove It Permanently 1.0.6.401:20
BUGabundo1old habbit....01:20
asaci use rm -rf ;)01:20
BUGabundo1eheheehehehehehe01:20
BUGabundo1not on websites01:20
asacPaste and Go 2 0.801:20
BUGabundo1oh Fab!01:20
BUGabundo1can't leave without01:20
BUGabundo1it broke a while ago01:21
asacpaste and go?01:21
BUGabundo1went crazy until it got fixed01:21
BUGabundo1yeah01:21
asacfor me it sounds like it doesnt contribute to being focussed01:21
BUGabundo1ctrl+shift+v pastes URLs to new tab01:21
asaci mean by definition you cannot think twice when "going" ;)01:21
BUGabundo1and opens01:21
BUGabundo1with just one move01:21
asacBUGabundo1: you can use middle mouse to paste urls01:21
gnomefreakboy you got little shit complains in firefox. whens the next upload for firefox-3.0 to ubuntu repos?01:21
asacto new tabs01:21
BUGabundo1without it: ctrl+t, paste, enter01:22
BUGabundo1asac: don't like PC mice01:22
gnomefreakmake that ubufox01:22
asacBUGabundo1: ctrl+middlemouse -> opens new tab with url you had copied01:22
BUGabundo1nice to know01:22
BUGabundo1still requires mouse01:22
BUGabundo1I don't have one here now.01:23
asacCustomizeGoogle 0.7601:23
BUGabundo1touchpad sucks for midlleclick01:23
BUGabundo1eheh01:23
asaci would think one can surely live without that01:23
BUGabundo1oh no01:23
BUGabundo1great options there01:23
BUGabundo1ehehheheeeheh01:23
asacwell01:23
BUGabundo1I should try the all list01:23
BUGabundo1LOL01:23
asacits really matter of cleaning up01:23
BUGabundo1wouldn't go back01:23
asaci mean its hard to throw away old things that stacked up01:23
BUGabundo1I do!01:24
asacover time01:24
asacits like hose cleaning01:24
BUGabundo1I haven't got ONE new in weeks01:24
BUGabundo1and removed a few01:24
BUGabundo1and disable all I don't use01:24
BUGabundo1the last one to be added was the longurl01:24
asacfor you not getting ONE new for weeks should not be the goal01:24
asacrather removing 2 a week ;)01:24
BUGabundo1eheh01:24
asacyeah but well01:25
BUGabundo1I'll try to make a new profile and just instal the bare minium01:25
BUGabundo1still I bet they will grow fast01:25
asacBUGabundo1: remove stuff when you dont use it for a week01:25
BUGabundo1TMB, noscript, addblock, betterGreader, bla bla01:25
* BUGabundo1 checks firefox status bar for unused addons01:26
BUGabundo1ok 201:26
BUGabundo1maybe 401:26
asaci would say 1001:26
asac;)01:26
asacfor now01:26
asacGO 1.0.0 beta01:26
asacViewMyCurrency 0.389701:26
gnomefreakis anyone else seeing the page loading (greyish blue) color in the address bar when loading?01:27
asacgnomefreak: on which ffox version?01:27
gnomefreaki dont have the bar in lower right corner of 3.0.701:27
gnomefreakits in awsomebar now01:27
gnomefreakawesomebar even01:28
asaci dont see that01:28
asacon 3.001:28
asacnor on 3.601:28
gnomefreakmaybe an extension?01:29
BUGabundo112 disabled, 1 removed01:29
gnomefreaki thought we stopped supported firefox-2? if so why is someone trying to compile it01:29
BUGabundo1ViewMyCurrency is a bit broken for Euro01:30
asacjust reading: so the former CEO of deutsche-post AG got caught in tax fraught thing and got fired ... now he gets 20 million EUR pension ... thats how it works01:30
gnomefreakasac: ill let you mark this as wont fix. bug 346506 we dont build anything using FF-201:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 346506 in firefox ".pc files in firefox-2-dev are broken" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/34650601:30
gnomefreakthat i know of01:30
BUGabundo1how about that asac? is that any better?01:32
gnomefreakok smoke than ill hit bugs not just email01:32
asacBUGabundo1: great01:33
asacBUGabundo1: thats good enough for today ;)01:33
asac12 new disabled01:33
asacor 12 in total now?01:34
BUGabundo112 from the ones I add active01:34
asacsorry. cant parse that ;)?01:35
BUGabundo1and one removed01:35
BUGabundo1from all of those01:35
BUGabundo1I disabled 1201:35
asacyes. did you disable 12 on top of those that were already disabled in paste you posted above?01:35
BUGabundo1can't say it any other way01:35
asacor are now 12 disabled in total ;)01:35
asac?01:35
BUGabundo1ahh01:35
BUGabundo1yes01:35
BUGabundo1more 1201:35
asacso how many are disabled now?01:35
asac20?01:35
BUGabundo1haven't count how many are leaft active01:35
asac;)01:36
asacno need to ;)01:36
asacwe can continue in a week or so ;)01:36
asacLong URL Please 0.3.001:36
asac;)01:36
BUGabundo1around 33 active01:36
BUGabundo1asac: don't you hate µblog blind urls?01:37
asacok long urls might make some sense for privacy01:37
BUGabundo1how the F. invented that?01:37
asacBUGabundo1: acutally no. but yeah. its dangerous and one should look where they go before clicking in general01:37
BUGabundo1asac: but they are blind!01:37
BUGabundo1you can't see where it takes you01:38
asacyes. thts why i said:01:38
asac02:37 < asac> ok long urls might make some sense for privacy01:38
asacbut i rather would want that feature in gwibber i guess01:38
BUGabundo1(01:37:39 AM) asac: BUGabundo1: its dangerous and one should look where they go before clicking in general01:38
BUGabundo1me too01:38
asaci dont want to replace them as it takes lot of space01:39
gnomefreakgood news: i think i found SM2 build problem. bad news i dont have an upstream dir to run autoconf2.1301:39
asacjust seeing where they point to while hoevering01:39
asacmaybe domain is even enough01:39
BUGabundo1like qaiku does ?01:39
asaci sthat another extension? ;)01:39
asacor KDE ?01:40
BUGabundo1its a µblog01:41
BUGabundo1clone from jaiky01:41
BUGabundo1*jaiku01:41
gnomefreakhttp://www.qaiku.com/01:41
BUGabundo1they also short urls and just show domain a part of the path01:41
asachmm meta bonding site?01:41
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: you there too?01:41
BUGabundo1asac: ??01:41
gnomefreakno i searched for it when you didnt answer01:41
gnomefreak:) not sure what it is01:41
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: looking at other channels backlog01:42
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: it's a social network01:42
BUGabundo1one more... but better01:42
BUGabundo1has all the good stuff of jaiku01:42
BUGabundo1in my opinion the BEST SN/µB around01:42
BUGabundo1beats twitter by the mile01:42
gnomefreakdont know what that is either :) is it like a blog?01:42
BUGabundo1but since Google bought it (or the owners Know how) its dead01:43
BUGabundo1now, qaiku is leading where it was left01:43
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: it can be01:43
BUGabundo1but µ01:43
BUGabundo1140 chars01:43
asacwhy yet antoher social netowrking site?01:43
BUGabundo1but replies are unlimited01:43
BUGabundo1LOL01:43
gnomefreakwhy do i get the feeling ive been to this site this morning when myrtle showed it01:43
BUGabundo1gnomefreak: she loves it too01:43
gnomefreakits was pink with turtles with hearts on them01:44
gnomefreakhad your comments on it too01:44
* asac drowns the whisky in the sink and gets a beer01:44
BUGabundo1she is so punped up on it, that she even copies/pastes MANUALLY everything there01:44
BUGabundo1until they have Gwibber and/or XMPP support01:44
gnomefreakyes it was this site. i see how the cvomments are set up01:44
gnomefreakstill dont knwo what i would do with it01:45
gnomefreakclick on channels at the top than ask yourself why more channels doesnt IRC have enough01:46
BUGabundo1eheheeh01:46
BUGabundo1well *those* µblogs (jaiku and qaiku, and even identica)01:47
BUGabundo1rival with IRC01:47
BUGabundo1its easier for noobs01:47
BUGabundo1and the web interface makes it easier01:47
gnomefreakasac: bzr doesnt adhear to the following bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder=  in theory it should leave upstream dir in build-area but doesnt so i cant run autoconf01:47
BUGabundo1besides the background queues allow you to do a lot more01:47
BUGabundo1xmpp, sms, email, rss etc01:47
BUGabundo1and IRC channels tend to be on topic!01:48
gnomefreaki just got the rss for asac's identica01:48
BUGabundo1on your µblog lifestream you just do what ever you want01:48
BUGabundo1eheeh01:48
BUGabundo1try not  to have mine01:48
BUGabundo1you may get flooded01:48
BUGabundo1but you may want my shared feed01:48
BUGabundo1its much clamer now, that works keeps me busy many hours01:49
gnomefreakBUGabundo1: stop with that charetor the "u" loking like thing. i cant do that and not sure what it is :( and people wonder why i dont come on at night01:49
BUGabundo1http://feeds.bugabundo.net/BUGabundo-sharedfeed01:49
asacgnomefreak: thats a my01:49
BUGabundo1µ=micro01:49
asaca greek letter01:49
gnomefreakthats a russia char i think01:49
BUGabundo1altgr m01:49
gnomefreakah01:49
asacsynonym for micro01:49
asacyou type it with alt gr + m01:49
asacµ01:50
asac;)01:50
BUGabundo1ehheh01:50
BUGabundo1you are the 1st to ever comment on it!01:50
BUGabundo1its so easy on linux01:50
GreeneryFirefox 3.5 nightly build didn't close the app completely, although it was already closed. I ended up to have to kill it. Any idea why? I'm using Kubuntu 8.10 KDE4.201:50
BUGabundo1Win u need alt+u253 or soemthing01:50
asacGreenery: firefox has issues if you replace files while its running01:50
gnomefreakbrdisable ubufox and try01:50
asacGreenery: thats known01:50
asacand its one of the harder things to fix ,)01:51
Greeneryah i see...thought it was kubuntu only problem01:51
gnomefreakasac: it sounds like the issue i had where i had to killall firefox-3.101:51
asacits most important that you close it as soon as possible01:51
asacwithout tring to open previously not opened parts of firefox01:51
asacotherwise it hangs and a hidden window stays alive01:51
asacthat causes odd behaviuor01:51
asacyes. killall is the way to do that01:52
asacbut its not something we can expect from users01:52
Greeneryis there a bug number for that?01:52
gnomefreakcome to think of it i remember that from cem01:52
asacGreenery: bug 3673901:53
ubottuLaunchpad bug 36739 in firefox-3.0 "MASTER Misbehaves in all sorts of ways when upgraded while running" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/3673901:53
asacold bug01:53
gnomefreakim still tryint to get the [1] or [2] in the upper part of the line for when linking people to somewhere you use bleh bleh bleh see[1] and so on than leave the links at bottom of whatever it is you are in01:53
asacsetting to triaged ;)01:53
asacit predates times where triaged didnt exist01:54
BUGabundo1"Please View The Attachment And Call Mr.Akan Tutu On This No: + (27)74 87 11946. As Soon As Possible.Thanks You. " SPAM FAIL01:54
BUGabundo1hey asac that's nice! I got that EVERY single Class I gave01:54
BUGabundo1to the point I would force students to upgrade even before using FF01:55
asacok i gave a status update on the bug02:00
BUGabundo1brb02:01
BUGabundo1gona grab something to eat02:01
BUGabundo12am is a bad hour to be up02:01
BUGabundo1back02:05
* BUGabundo1 heads to LP to find older versions of NM02:05
BUGabundo1asac: lost...02:07
BUGabundo1https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/0.7.1~rc3-0ubuntu1/+build/893213 ?02:11
asacBUGabundo1: yes. the binaries are on the right02:15
asaceach .deb one page :-P02:15
BUGabundo1got them02:15
BUGabundo1http://paste.ubuntu.com/135166/02:16
BUGabundo1if that's it, I'm installing and going to bed02:16
BUGabundo1test tommorow02:16
asacyes02:17
BUGabundo1cy02:17
asaccu02:18
=== Ampelbein is now known as ampelbein
cwilluhmm, latest build out of ubuntu-mozilla-daily, my mouse wheel doesn't work09:55
cwilluscroll bar works fine, but mouse wheel does nothing09:55
cwilluand now it works10:07
cwilluweird10:07
=== Ampelbein is now known as ampelbein
gnomefreakok 1. why would the jaunty build of SM2 work and intrepid and hardy fail on the fsh patch. 2. on Jaunty patch ../../*config/Make.in fails to apply im guessing due to lack of running autoconf2.13?11:34
gnomefreakthere was a 3. but dont remember off hand11:34
gnomefreakoh in  1. i didnt need to run autoconf2.13 on Jaunty and used same branch for hardy adn intrepid11:35
=== c0p3rn1c_ is now known as c0p3rn1c
gnomefreakis this site in french? http://atilf.atilf.fr/tlf.htm12:44
asacgnomefreak: its not chinese13:25
gnomefreakoh shit i didnt see the .fr :(13:26
asacgnomefreak: you know that all english words ending with "ment" are french words do you?13:26
asacentertainment engagement ... and so on ;)13:26
asactreatment (well thats traitment i ges in french ... but you get the point ,))13:26
gnomefreakyep13:30
gnomefreakasac: bug 220628 is now the master bug for Xwindow errors in FF if there is already a master bug please let me know ill fix it13:32
ubottuLaunchpad bug 220628 in firefox "firefox-3.0b5 received an X Window System error: 'BadIDChoice'" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22062813:32
gnomefreakatm has 11 duplicates on it13:40
gnomefreakits still early maybe i will do some real bug work not just email13:44
gnomefreaksmoke13:44
gnomefreakbug 23399013:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 233990 in thunderbird "Bare lf in mdn message from crashing thunderbird" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23399013:51
asacgnomefreak: looking ad id bug14:15
asacat14:15
gnomefreaki looked upstream and found a few but none that really explained it to me. i left the link from search on bug14:47
gnomefreakim going to eat14:47
BUGabundoasac: hi15:20
BUGabundodo you need any tests from me at bug 325868 ?15:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 325868 in xorg-server "huge fonts" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32586815:20
BUGabundoor from my hw?15:20
asacBUGabundo: my questions were addressed to LeSpocky15:21
BUGabundoI know15:22
BUGabundoI read Kubuntu15:22
asacthe symptoms on the wiki page are out of date15:22
BUGabundookay15:22
BUGabundogood to know15:22
asacso the bug in general doesnt apply anymore15:22
BUGabundoI'm sub to the wiki, hasn't get any updateds15:22
asace.g. we have pixel sized fonts and not point sized fonts15:22
BUGabundonice15:22
asacBUGabundo: sure. i didnt even know something like that was on it15:22
BUGabundoguess I need to get a daily and test again15:22
asacBUGabundo: you shouzld unset your font settings15:22
asacin gconf15:22
asacto get what we ship by default15:22
BUGabundohow?15:23
asacotherwise you might still use points15:23
asacwait a sec15:23
asacgconftool-2 -u /desktop/gnome/interface/font_name /desktop/gnome/interface/document_font_name /desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font_name15:24
BUGabundoand that info should be on the wiki! and release notes so that other users upgrading fix their system15:24
asacBUGabundo: i have to update it15:24
BUGabundoohh everything is BIGGER now15:24
asacbut first i need to fix the font config dialog15:24
asacatm i cannot tell how it will be in the end ;)15:24
asacBUGabundo: yes, could be15:25
asacBUGabundo: what font size did you previously use?15:25
BUGabundo13.333 is bad15:25
asacBUGabundo: nah15:25
BUGabundo815:25
BUGabundo13.3" @ 1280x80015:25
asacBUGabundo: yes. 13.333px is 1015:25
BUGabundo112 DPIs15:25
asacso you need 10.666px15:25
asacyeah15:25
BUGabundohey.. stuff is not changing!!!!!15:26
asacgconftool-2 -s --type string /desktop/gnome/interface/font_name "Sans 10.666px"15:26
BUGabundoI can't reduce font now on appearance?15:26
asacgconftool-2 -s --type string /desktop/gnome/interface/document_font_name "Sans 10.666px"15:26
asacBUGabundo: dont use appearence15:26
asacthats currently not proper15:26
BUGabundowhy?15:26
BUGabundois there a bug for that?15:26
asacbecause i havent come to fix that yet15:26
BUGabundookay15:26
asacrun the comands above15:27
BUGabundodid15:27
BUGabundohumm15:27
asacand if your terminal is too big still use gconftool-2 -s --type string /desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font_name "Monospace 10.666px"15:27
BUGabundostill getting used to it15:27
asacBUGabundo: gnome-terminal has a bug. use the one from my ppa15:27
BUGabundomy terminal is never big enough15:27
asace.g. gnome terminal makes sthings really big15:27
BUGabundoI always increase it15:27
asacheh15:28
asacok15:28
BUGabundoI have bad vision15:28
asacthen try to use my gnome-terminal from ppa and run:15:28
asacand if your terminal is too big still use gconftool-2 -s --type string /desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font_name "Monospace 14.666px"15:28
asacor even gconftool-2 -s --type string /desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font_name "Monospace 16px"15:28
asacBUGabundo: but take the terminal from my ppa for that otherwise it will be like 25 pixel of size ;)15:29
asacwhich is probably too big for you too15:29
asaci use 14.666px15:29
BUGabundoehhee15:29
BUGabundolet me add your ppa15:29
BUGabundojust one question: how is this going to affect KDE apps?15:30
BUGabundogreat... there goes my kmail title bar15:30
asacBUGabundo: kde still has the problem from the wiki page15:30
asacBUGabundo: thats why i ask him to test ubuntu, which has that fixed by using pixel sized fonts15:30
BUGabundoI should file a bug on that.... but I already know the response15:30
BUGabundo"kde apps on gnome?!"15:30
asacBUGabundo: i would recomment to use 13.333px like our defaults and 14.666px or even 16px for monospace15:31
asacBUGabundo: well. gtk-qt-engine might have some impact15:31
asacbut i doubt it15:31
asacin general i didnt touch much that would affect qt15:31
asacand kde15:31
BUGabundohttp://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/screenshot_001.png15:32
BUGabundoalso nautilus fonts are HUGE15:33
BUGabundofor files names15:33
BUGabundoFirefox menus and status bar are smallish15:33
BUGabundoFF Title bar are too big15:34
BUGabundohttp://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/screenshot_002.png15:36
BUGabundofirefox look15:36
asacBUGabundo: yes nautilus is a bug15:56
asacthere are a bunch of apps that have some isues15:56
BUGabundoand FF?15:56
asactbird, nautilus, pidgin15:56
asacFF should be right15:56
asacBUGabundo: the titlebar font looks like 10.666px15:56
asacif you changed it bck to 13.333px restart firefox15:56
asacfirefox doesnt always update fonts instantaneously15:57
BUGabundook15:58
BUGabundoI'll do15:58
BUGabundofiling bugs now15:58
asacBUGabundo: for what?15:59
BUGabundoread #u-devel16:01
BUGabundosoftware-properties16:01
BUGabundohttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/3878116:01
ubottuUbuntu bug 38781 in software-properties "Enh: confirmation dialog for adding an apt-key" [Wishlist,Triaged]16:01
asacah ok16:02
BUGabundoasac: 3.6 looks as bad!16:06
BUGabundotoo small16:06
asacBUGabundo: as i said you are using 10.666px somewhere16:07
asacstill16:07
BUGabundohttp://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/screenshot_003.png16:07
BUGabundoahh16:07
BUGabundomissed that16:07
BUGabundoyes! Fonts still have 2 816:07
asacBUGabundo: gconftool-2 -a /desktop/gnome/interface16:08
asacgconftool-2 -a /desktop/gnome/interface | grep font_na font_name = Sans 13.333px document_font_name = Sans 13.333px monospace_font_name = Monospace 14.666px16:08
BUGabundoFonts: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/screenshot_004.png16:08
asacBUGabundo: dont go to appearence dialog16:08
asacdont do that16:08
asacits currently broken16:08
asacjust use gconf for now16:09
BUGabundohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/135458/16:09
BUGabundoI didn't mess there16:09
BUGabundoits just showing the result of our changes16:09
asacBUGabundo: ok16:09
asacgo to gconf-editor16:09
asacand set Monospace to 13.333px16:09
asacor even 14.666px16:09
BUGabundook16:09
asac monospace_font_name16:09
asacis the key16:09
asacok then set the others to 13.333px16:10
asacthats more likely what you want16:10
asacif you want the things a bit smaller use 12.000px16:10
asace.g. for font_name16:10
asacand document_font_name16:10
asacok ... so the window title is also an issue16:10
asacwe havent changed that yet, but change16:11
asac/apps/metacity/general/titlebar_font16:11
asacuse 13.333px16:11
asacor 12.000px16:11
asacor 10.666px16:11
asacfor the titlebar_font16:11
BUGabundocalm down!16:12
BUGabundoehee16:12
asacwhatever you prefer16:12
BUGabundocan't type that fast16:12
asacBUGabundo: yeah. i will stop now16:12
BUGabundosorry16:12
asacjust change the four keys  ;)16:12
asacBUGabundo: its all ;)16:12
BUGabundoits hard to change and test16:12
asacBUGabundo: nah16:12
asacjust close the font appearence dialog ... never open it again ;)16:12
asacthen go through gconf-editor and o the changes i said16:12
asacand then restart firefox16:12
BUGabundook, back16:15
BUGabundostupid pidgin plugin memory leak!16:15
asacBUGabundo: http://paste.ubuntu.com/135459/16:15
BUGabundouses all my ram and swap16:15
asacrun those commands for normal sized fonts16:15
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/135460/16:16
asacand those if you want everything one step smaller ;)16:16
BUGabundoclose16:16
BUGabundoFF 3.6 is close to perfect16:16
BUGabundotitle bar is too small, and tab text is too big16:17
BUGabundofine tunning now16:17
asacBUGabundo: screenshot16:17
asacBUGabundo: title bar ... thats the last command you ran16:17
asacyou can choose a bit bigger font there16:17
asace.g. add 1.33316:17
BUGabundopidgin fonts are huge too16:17
asacBUGabundo: thats a bug in pidgin16:18
BUGabundoand gnome apps bar16:18
asacignore that for now16:18
asaci have the fix16:18
asacBUGabundo: what is gnome apps bar?16:18
asacplease a screenshot. i probable dont know it yet16:18
BUGabundothe bottom bar16:18
BUGabundouploading16:18
BUGabundoits 3G16:18
BUGabundoit takes a bit16:18
BUGabundohttp://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/Screenshot.png16:19
BUGabundoNautilus Fonts is even bigger16:19
asacnautilus is known bug ... i will fix it (its already in the bug)16:19
asacBUGabundo: yeah. pidgin is under control here16:20
BUGabundo$ gconftool-2 --type string -s /apps/metacity/general/titlebar_font "Sans 13.333px"16:20
asacthe bottom bar looks ok16:20
asacthats the default font_name16:20
BUGabundolook better16:20
asacBUGabundo: yeah. in general 13.333px is good for all16:20
BUGabundohumm but the gnome app bar is too big16:20
BUGabundowhich one is it?16:21
BUGabundogconftool-2 --type string -s /desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font_name "Monospace 14.666px" > 13 ?16:21
asacyes. but it was never different from the other font_name things16:21
asacBUGabundo: no16:21
asacBUGabundo: its font_name16:21
asacthats used everywhere for you16:21
asace.g. menu and so on16:21
asacso if you want the bottom bar smaller your menus and buttons and so on will be smaller in general16:21
BUGabundomenu is too big16:21
BUGabundolet me try 13.316:21
asacBUGabundo: yeah. so you want /desktop/gnome/interface/font_name 12px16:22
asacBUGabundo: menu is also font_name16:22
BUGabundomuch better16:22
asacplease run gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/interface/ again16:22
asacand paste it16:22
asacgconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/interface16:23
asac(without the trailing slash)16:23
BUGabundohttp://pastebin.com/f4929506216:23
BUGabundohttp://pastebin.com/f44e5de2e16:23
asacBUGabundo: yeah. thats the defaults we ship ;)16:23
asacBUGabundo: so you were just confused by the metacity titlebar thing16:23
asac(which we kept using the old unit for now)16:23
asacgood16:23
BUGabundook so its pidgin and Nautilus bugs for now?16:24
BUGabundoyakes Terminal is huge!16:24
BUGabundoglad I set my own to 11px16:24
asacBUGabundo: terminal is fixed in my ppa16:26
asacsame for thunderbird16:27
BUGabundook16:27
BUGabundoupgrading now16:27
gnomefreak*Warning* Email Flood: please check email often to prevent too much flooding16:27
BUGabundoI always set manually16:27
asaccurrent gnome terminal just uses your px value and uses them as point ... so things are really huge16:27
BUGabundognomefreak: ROFL16:27
gnomefreakasac: i need a way to find out what -dbgsym packages are needed for tb2 crash reports16:27
gnomefreakim cleaning up FF2.0 bug reports16:27
gnomefreakdown to 293 started over 33016:28
BUGabundoasac: one more16:28
BUGabundohttp://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/screenshot_005.png16:28
BUGabundoupdate manager16:28
asacyeah update manager is bogus16:30
asacBUGabundo: i would think its a update-Manager default thing16:30
asaclets check16:30
gnomefreaklooking16:31
gnomefreakfonts?16:31
BUGabundoyeah16:32
* gnomefreak wonders why you are still having issues with font.16:33
gnomefreakasac: as i recall U-M gets fonts from system16:33
asacBUGabundo: yeah. ok update-manager suffers from broken gtk which i have fixed16:35
asaclet me check16:35
asaclol ... i dont have update-manager installed ;)16:36
BUGabundoROFL16:39
gnomefreakubuntu-desktop installs it ;)16:42
BUGabundohe is not using u-desktop16:46
gnomefreakhe uses firefox and by trial and error if using a devel cycle you should have u-d installed to reduce upgrade problems ;)16:48
asaci dont know ;)16:49
asaci think i dropped it at some point16:49
BUGabundoI guess it forces some package you didn't want16:50
gnomefreaklike evolution :)16:52
BUGabundoyeah16:52
gnomefreak279 left, smoke my back hurts like shit16:52
BUGabundoI just use it as PIM for calendar and gmail contacts16:52
BUGabundofor mail I rather user KMail16:52
BUGabundoeven with all its crashes and unfixed bugs16:52
gnomefreaki havent figured out how to set up any of the text based emails so i use SM2 and TB3 for all but 2 of my emails. the 2 left are spam catchers16:58
BUGabundoah?17:04
gnomefreaki have 2 emails that i route spam to :)17:06
BUGabundoyes that I got17:08
BUGabundoI have some spam inboxes too17:08
BUGabundobut the all text based?17:08
BUGabundomutt?17:08
BUGabundoasac: have you seen OOo??17:11
BUGabundoits the biggest Font issue I've seen17:11
asacgiven that update-manager remove i expect that i dont have it either ;)17:11
asacBUGabundo: please screen17:11
gnomefreakBUGabundo: i havent figured any of them out yet :(17:12
BUGabundohttp://dl.getdropbox.com/u/112892/Screenshot-1.png17:12
BUGabundoasac: ^^^^^17:12
BUGabundostatus bar is too big17:13
BUGabundoMenu bar is huge17:13
BUGabundofont name and size boxes are too big17:13
BUGabundooh and the ruler17:13
gnomefreaki blame extensions ;)17:21
asacnah. its certainly a OOO bug17:21
asacgiven so many apps having regressions i feel like this is not gonna make it ... meaning back to point font sizing for jaunty17:21
BUGabundoyeah17:22
BUGabundoits to short on time17:22
gnomefreakwhat is the bug number for the right click master bug?17:40
asacgnomefreak: bug 18731317:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 187313 in firefox "[MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/18731317:42
gnomefreakasac: thanks17:42
gnomefreakoh what the fuck. am i here?17:48
gnomefreakthis is becoming a pain in the ass OOPS-1177EC9217:48
gnomefreakill talk to #lp in a bit17:48
BUGabundognomefreak: I see you17:49
gnomefreakthan why OOPS :(17:52
BUGabundoLP edge slow?17:55
gnomefreakno i tryed changing it and it changed but gave me an oops anyway18:00
gnomefreakit is reproducible in staging as well18:01
[reed]How do I remove all mention of a package from dpkg's db without actually removing any of the files?18:05
gnomefreaksudo apt-get clean? that should clean out the cache but not sure if packages go too18:08
[reed]like, I have a package installed18:08
BUGabundoarchive packages go18:08
[reed]but I want to remove it from being controlled by apt/dpkg18:08
[reed]and leave it completely in my control (as in, just the files, no packaging info at all)18:08
BUGabundoonly way I know18:08
BUGabundois to remove the package and then install from source18:08
BUGabundoany deb use, will include it on DB18:09
gnomefreakwhy not just pin it? that way ubuntu doesnt update it18:12
gnomefreakok who wants to fix SM2 it should be a simple autoconf2.13 only problem is bzr --dont-purge is not leaving the dir in build-area at the rate im going ill never get to it.18:18
cwillu[reed], you can't, without hacking the db18:30
cwillu[reed], back up a step though, what are you trying to do?18:30
[reed]I installed a .deb, and now I want to swap to manually maintaining this package using just an svn checkout, but I don't want dpkg/apt/aptitude to remove my existing config and such... I ended up just renaming everything, dpkg -r'ing it, and then renaming it back18:32
[reed]that worked...18:32
cwillu[reed], the config (anything in /etc) isn't removed when you remove a package18:32
[reed]the config isn't in /etc, though18:32
[reed]so, I wasn't too sure if it would remove it or not ;)18:32
cwilluif it was a proper debian/ubuntu package, and the configuration was actually configuration, and not scripts that were part of the application that you hacked on, then they should be left alone :p18:33
cwilluanything in your home directory also counts as config18:34
[reed]it's not a proper debian/ubuntu package...18:34
[reed]just a .deb somebody created for a package :)18:34
BUGabundo[OT] Ubuntu gurus: please review and help me improve it for my next FLOSS class: http://hellotxt.com/l/gtEN18:56
ftahi18:57
BUGabundohi fta18:57
gnomefreakdown to an even 20018:58
ftaasac, 3G didn't work at all on my netbook :(18:58
gnomefreakbrb18:58
BUGabundofta did you down grade the NM libs?18:58
BUGabundoI did... still haven't tested it though18:59
BUGabundofta 0.7.1~rc3-0ubuntu118:59
ftait's a fresh install, no ppa18:59
asacfta: i dont know what drivre you have18:59
BUGabundofresh trunk NM won't work18:59
BUGabundoI tried yesterday with daily build19:00
ftait's the same key, the huawei19:00
BUGabundome too19:00
BUGabundoe220 I think19:00
BUGabundofta that's why I asked if you could downgrade NM19:00
asacyeah try to downgrade19:01
BUGabundoto version 0.7.1~rc3-0ubuntu119:01
asacthere are a few filer functions added that should prevent too many devices from popping up19:01
BUGabundoI *think* that one worked19:01
BUGabundoasac: log is strange for trunk version19:01
asacyes that was before the attempt to fix device detection19:01
BUGabundolog shows it but says no serial port19:01
ftaBUGabundo, without any kind of network access, no i didn't19:01
ftaasac, btw, in the UNR image, ppp is not installed :(19:02
asacsigh19:03
ftaso if you install remix on a netbook, plug you 3G key, n-m asks you to configure it, then you wait and you're doomed19:03
ftathe logs shows no pppd binary found19:03
asacdidnt know its not installed19:03
ftai installed it, but it still didn't work for other reasons19:04
asacyeah. ppp not installed is a bug19:04
asaci guess i should depend on it from NM to prevent that19:04
fta12090 firefox-3.1                     1762   303   770   674    15 (Unknown)19:05
fta23441 firefox-3.2                      296    25    89   174     8 (Unknown)19:05
fta41405 firefox-3.5                       22     1     0    21     0 (Unknown)19:05
fta46228 firefox-3.6                       12     0     0    12     0 (Unknown)19:05
fta1062  firefox-3.0                    517706 81481 361515 74672    38 (Alexander Sack)19:05
fta552   firefox                        914720 10037 439043  1990 463650 (Alexander Sack)19:05
fta52128 firefox2                           6     0     6     0     0 (Unknown)19:05
asacok so 3.2 is obviously mostly daily19:06
ftanope, i think most are from my PPA19:07
asacyou should remove ffox 3.2 from there19:07
asacbecause there are no milestones for19:07
asacit19:07
ftai just wait a bit to see how it stabilizes19:08
fta1 week should be enough19:08
asaci am not sure if numbers ever get removed19:09
fta?19:09
fta4354  prism                          18888  1562 16240  1079     7 (Ubuntu Mozilla Team)19:09
ftanot that bad19:09
fta15726 chromium-browser                 955    36     0   919     0 (Unknown)19:10
fta\o/19:10
BUGabundowhat numbers are those?19:10
ftacatching up on19:10
fta9629  cxchromium                      3065   338  2503   164    60 (Unknown)19:10
ftapopcon19:10
fta16283 gwibber                          884   122   300   462     0 (Unknown)19:11
ftayeah, chromium-browser beats gwibber, even without beeing in universe :)19:11
asaci dont think there are any new installs from gwibber19:12
asacall that wanted it had it before19:12
asacok watching TV now ... enough font mess for today19:13
fta884 is the number of installs, not new installs19:13
asacwhat i ment was that universe doesnt help any app that isnt used ;)19:14
asacespecially if its in universe of developmeent release ;)19:14
asacuniverse gives more tracition than PPA ... but that is only true for stuff in stable releases with good description and so on ;)19:15
asacfta: this is all good. but debian ITP is now taking ... which will make it bad for future19:18
asaci asked them if we can take over the ITP for you now19:19
BUGabundo[OT] Ubuntu gurus: please review and help me improve it for my next FLOSS class: http://hellotxt.com/l/gtEN19:19
asacbut it was a huge mistake not take the ITP i am sure. it means wasted energy in the long run19:20
ftaif someone does it better, i have no problem with that19:21
asacfta: the package could have been maintained in debian and would automatically come back to ubuntu19:22
asacthis way its a time bomb19:22
asacyou dont know what debian folks are up to19:22
ftasomeone told me last week he wanted to do the itp for me, using my code, i agreed19:23
ftano news since19:23
asacfta: well. someone took the ITP19:23
asacmaybe thats him19:24
asacbut what he will do is fork your stuff19:24
asacmost likely19:24
asacif not in the beginning, in the end19:24
asacfta: give him access to the chromium bzr repo at least19:24
asacso he maintains the debian changes directly there19:24
asacat least i would try that way19:24
asacdebian bug 52032419:25
ubottuDebian bug 520324 in wnpp "ITP: chromium -- A web browser developed by Google based on the" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/52032419:25
ftasame guy19:26
gnomefreak!codecs19:26
ubottuFor multimedia issues, this page has useful information: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats - See also https://help.ubuntu.com/8.10/musicvideophotos/C/video.html - But please use free formats if you can: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FreeFormats19:26
BUGabundoor go direcly to medibuntu19:30
asacok i think i will wait two more weeks and then just take over those ITPs19:30
ftawhich ones?19:30
asacall chromium related19:31
asaci just cannot see this blowing up ;)19:31
ftai never understood why you never asked me to join, i would be pleased to see you contribute19:31
asacfta: i have no time. but given the current risk i would just push your stuff to debian19:32
asaci guess when i start doing that i will automatically contribute ;)19:32
ftai don't think it's acceptable for them, too many in source deps19:32
asacits ok19:32
ftathey would need an updated ia32-libs too19:33
asacworst thing that would happen is that it doesnt migrate to testing19:33
asacsure19:33
asacdoest debian have that at all?19:33
fta?19:34
asacwasnt sure if they stopped maintaining that package19:35
asacok now TV ... bbl19:35
gnomefreak139 bugs including the songbird bug19:36
gnomefreakim so done19:36
gnomefreaki will try to get to SM2 this week sometime. I know i have to work a few days this week. i'm sure i wont mind if i take a few days off and let the 2 guys run the shop :)19:37
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: don't forget to update flashplugin-nonfree thankyou! :)19:40
BUGabundoeheh19:40
* c0p3rn1c ducks behind BUGabundo for cover :-p19:42
BUGabundoI are big.... but not that big!19:42
c0p3rn1chehe19:42
BUGabundognomefreak kicks both our asses19:42
c0p3rn1chmmz I thing where lucky today because gnomefreak seems to have passed out from exhaustion :-)19:44
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: flash?19:44
c0p3rn1cthink*19:44
gnomefreakyou mean 64?19:44
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: yup :-)19:44
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: it will be a while. i cant find upstream source or md5sum and i have to figure out how to install and configure qmenu since i dont have 64 arch19:45
* gnomefreak too tired to lift my foot that high BUGabundo :)19:46
BUGabundoso c0p3rn1c you need to bug upstream foruns to have them publish a MD519:46
c0p3rn1caiaiai19:46
gnomefreakpublish the source would be best19:46
gnomefreaki can get md5 from source19:46
BUGabundoheeheheheheheheheheeheheheheheheheheheehehe19:46
c0p3rn1c:-D19:46
BUGabundoyeah right! (adobe) source19:46
ftagood, chromium ppa is green now: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=any&field.series_filter=jaunty19:46
c0p3rn1cyou mean when hell freezes over ? :0P19:46
gnomefreakand you wonder why im not in a hurry :)19:47
BUGabundowant some US dolar money making slots with that too?19:47
c0p3rn1c:-)19:47
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: ehm I dunno how flashplugin-nonfree is packaged but isn't it just a job of replacing that library ?19:48
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: its a job to replace the md5sum for most part than hope it builds ok we just use scripts to grab upstream source19:49
c0p3rn1cI just copied libflashplayer.so to a directory and tada, it works19:50
gnomefreakfta: its broke i think19:50
ftagnomefreak, what is broken?19:50
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: our scripts do that for us, for 32bit and uses nspluginwrapper to grab 32bit for 64bit arch19:50
c0p3rn1cI don't have nspluginwrapper installed19:51
ftad'oh! https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa19:51
gnomefreakfta: nevermind i see that the version went from 170 to 171 and thats why the versions looked wrong19:52
gnomefreakgood so its not just me that cant get shit to build19:52
gnomefreaki see 9 on that page at this time19:52
gnomefreakim gonna run dpkg-buildpackage but i dont htink it will help but maybe it will give me upstream dir so i can fix it way too much damn hoping19:54
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: I'm no linux guru and I don't know how to create packages yet but, the package installer just has to sudo mv libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/firefox-3.xxx/plugins/, after that flash works you don't need anything else as far as I know19:56
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: we are unable to support 64 at this time so for 64archs nspluginwrapper (as i recall is needed) now grabbing from upstream you wouldnt need nsplugin... for 64 bit19:57
gnomefreakthats odd. xulrunner updated but ff 3.5 didnt and they both still have lpia building im on 38619:58
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak:  I don't know what nspluginwrapper is and I dunno what you mean with upstream19:58
c0p3rn1cbut thats ok I guess, maybe I'll figure it out later, I just think it's a pitty for the other ubuntu 64 bit users out there19:59
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: you grabbed the package for 64bit from adobe. since we dont have it yet nspluginwrapper is needed to run 32bit on a 64bit arch19:59
gnomefreakdont worry when i get the info i need (if before KK starts) than it will hit PPA's depending on if someone grabs it bbefore i do20:00
c0p3rn1c since we dont have it yet, "it"?20:01
gnomefreakflash6420:01
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: it's over here http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz20:02
gnomefreakthis is gonna go horribly wrong :( i dont want to fuck with patches today20:02
gnomefreakahi only saw *.tip.tar.gz a few days ago20:02
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: hehe, ok , relax take it easy, I don't want it to go horribly wrong ether =)20:03
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: not flash that should be fairly simple. SM is going to go wrong (just a feeling20:03
gnomefreak)20:03
c0p3rn1cah, anyways, do you want me to remind you later or would you find that annoying , since you're swamped with work?20:04
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: remind me say thursday im hoping to be finished with everything else by than20:05
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: ok great, but I will take all the credit though ok ? :p20:05
c0p3rn1cj/k20:05
BUGabundognomefreak: after beta ?20:05
BUGabundoisn't that a bad date?20:06
BUGabundolots of new jaunty users == more bugs20:06
gnomefreakBUGabundo: not too bad eveything for jaunty adn intrepid and hardy are done just waiting for asac to push im assuming that will happen after beta freeze20:07
BUGabundook20:07
BUGabundoat least now we have testers20:07
gnomefreakok got tarball lets see how SM goes20:07
BUGabundoon Hardy everyone waited for RC or release20:07
BUGabundothen everyone complained about bugs...20:07
gnomefreakthis fucking patch needs to go to hell so badly20:07
BUGabundoppl expect stuff to be fixed automagicly20:08
* c0p3rn1c looks forward to brag to his friends about that he fixed flash64 on ubuntu =)20:08
BUGabundoROFL20:08
gnomefreakwhy the hell wont it keep the upstream dir when it fails on a patch20:08
BUGabundoI just have the upstream .so20:08
BUGabundounfortunatly I have to track updates manually20:08
gnomefreakeasy enough :) 492d98d25886afcaf18252334d4ac4e220:09
BUGabundoah?20:11
gnomefreakthats not gonna work i dont want a /so tarball20:11
gnomefreakyep thats all it contains is the .so20:12
c0p3rn1cyour talking about flash right?20:13
gnomefreakexample should be named flashplayer10_install_linux_091508.tar.gz with only the 64part not the .so20:13
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: yep20:13
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: I just read that it  doesn't play nicely with pulseaudio20:14
gnomefreaki have to make sure but i dont think the 10 tarball only holds .so file20:14
c0p3rn1cgnomefreak: maybe we should do some more testing before releasing it to the big public20:14
gnomefreakthats for someone else to screw with :) im sure it has something to do with being pre release since 10 didnt play will with PA before release20:15
gnomefreakc0p3rn1c: i wont relelase it until its done on our end it will end up in PPA and people should use at own risk :)20:15
BUGabundoc0p3rn1c: audio works here with flash64 bit20:16
BUGabundolet me jump to you tube or something20:16
c0p3rn1cBUGabundo: ah great, ok we should be safe then :)20:16
gnomefreakmore than likely its only libasound2-plugins that causes the issue however as i recall that is the main package for PA20:17
c0p3rn1cbut ehm atm other apps like vume don't detect that I have flash installed, can that be fixed ?20:17
gnomefreaktheres alot of shit in the control :(20:17
c0p3rn1cit's because I executed the following : "sudo apt-get remove nspluginwrapper flashplugin-nonfree"20:18
c0p3rn1cafter that I installed it20:18
c0p3rn1cas described on this forum : http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=772490&page=6420:18
gnomefreakits gonna be a little bit more work than i thought but its all good20:19
c0p3rn1cgreat well I'm going to study a littlebit more for my English exam tomorrow, got distracted again like you guys can see :)20:20
BUGabundobbl, dinner20:20
c0p3rn1cgood luck and cu later20:20
gnomefreakwhy do they give you an option to run -f when  it doesnt take that option :(20:22
gnomefreaki give up for today20:22
ftawtf is http://www.blogsdna.com/fr/2723/download-google-chrome-for-ubuntu-linux-pre-alpha-chromium-build.htm/20:29
ftait's not even french, none of the sentences make sense20:29
ftaand the content is wrong too20:29
ftaincluding the commands20:29
c0p3rn1cnooo, play rickroll in the background, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0, it pulled me trough all of the tough linux shit :p20:30
fta"Sudo apt-installer chrome navigateur" ??? lol20:30
ftalol20:56
ftahttp://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=9007&q=linux&sort=-id%20-stars&colspec=ID%20Stars%20Pri%20Area%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Modified%20Owner20:57
ftasome people are filing bugs upstream based on the daily ppa20:57
=== ampelbein is now known as Ampelbein
=== asac_ is now known as asac

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!