=== bazhang_ is now known as bazhang [00:00] what's this? why am i being sent here? i don't understand all this broken dcc stuff [00:04] LjL, cobalt being justified? not really as just moments before ikanobori was really way worse and he said nary a peep. [00:04] aubade was just being , well, a bit too frank [00:05] i can't join #unbutu, why is this? my router can't be upgaded further, i just disconnected and reconnected because my isp sucks [00:05] reduz: Read the topic of the channel you're sent to when you try and join #ubuntu [00:06] The link there gives you a page with other methods besides just update your firmwar [00:06] e [00:06] bazhang: he/she was like that this morning just not as bad IIRC [00:07] Flannel, says it's not able to test me [00:08] bazhang: i think i might have fixed the attitudes of both cobalt and aubade anyway [00:08] i've been very catalising. [00:08] catalystic [00:08] catalizering. [00:08] that. [00:09] oh permabans [00:09] reduz is not banned from #ubuntu to my knowledge [00:09] LjL: bansearch says so [00:10] bansearch might say so, but the channel's banlist doesn't... [00:10] at least not by nick [00:10] Hmmm [00:10] floodbots seem to [00:10] you're right. Removed March 22. Why is BT inconsistent? [00:10] LjL, well but i can't join, it sends me to #ubuntu-read-topic [00:11] hmm [00:11] wait LjL you really did the cattle-eratization thing with them. [00:11] reduz: Try getting tested again. [00:12] bazhang: i what? [00:12] Flannel, i just get malformed requests [00:12] yeah, you aren't vulnerable at this time [00:12] but i just don't see you in the banlist [00:12] reduz: try #ubuntu now [00:12] great, thanks [00:13] LjL, you didnt ban cobalt nor aubade from what I can tell [00:13] change port # for freenode and call it a day [00:13] gnomefreak: He's already fixed the vuln. [00:13] bazhang: no, i talked to them both [00:13] Flannel: ah [00:13] i dunno about reduz [00:13] Just needed to get tested, etc. [00:13] i can swear he wasn't in the banlist [00:14] which is confirmed by the fact that the bot set -b reduz!*@* [00:14] not -b reduz!*@*!#ubuntu-read-topic [00:14] might be server desync, though [00:14] kornbluth (iirc) was desynced some days ago [00:14] actually, [00:14] 17:07 -!- mode/#ubuntu [-b reduz!*@*!#ubuntu-read-topic] by FloodBot3 [00:14] That was 7 minutes ago. [00:14] oooh... [00:15] (at the same time he originally asked for the test, and was reported as not a known victim) [00:15] so... some bug there [00:15] Er, apparently a second test? [00:15] Ah! And the removal was after I asked ubottu, and before I checked BT proper [00:15] which, explains that discrepency. [00:15] yes [00:16] it's probably just that floodbot1 (the one giving messages in -read-topic) didn't have that ban recorded for some reason [00:16] but floodbot3 did [00:18] Hello! I would like to follow LjL's formal proceudrez [00:18] me2 [00:18] mc44, don't be silly [00:18] That's a jolly good idea. [00:18] if we're talking about a troll [00:18] then we don't want them to have a list of their previous nicknames cited in their presence [00:18] so, daemonfc is almightycthulu? [00:19] yes [00:19] Daemon* is AlmightyCthulhu, who has been banned before for being a pain in the ass. He's still a pain in the ass. [00:19] and he's not also DaemonNET, and the other "Daemon" we've had these days? [00:19] he is unstable frankly [00:19] If you haven't noticed, the person in there is Ryan Farmer, aka AlmightyCthulu amongst other names, his blog being http://izanbardprince.wordpress.com, wot I recognised from the whole hilarious Foxconn thing with mjg59 [00:19] daemondeb [00:19] (who, on his turn, was xavierg2003 - so i don't think so) [00:19] no that is a different daemon [00:19] mc44: no, i haven't noticed, or i wouldn't be asking for clarification [00:20] how do you know it's him? [00:20] DaemonFC, DaemonXP, and DaemonDEB are the same person, I think. [00:20] LjL: because he linked to his blog [00:20] ok [00:20] The guy referred to the blog that mc44 linked as his blog. [00:20] [DaemonDEB] (n=ryan@c-67-173-86-85.hsd1.il.comcast.net): ryan [00:20] which is on the DaemonXP account [00:20] we've known its him for several days now [00:21] <--due to someone's brilliance :) [00:21] i suppose he's not "supposed" to be banned from -ot just yet? [00:21] oh I mean mc44's [00:21] if we have known that, why is it not in a BT comment? ;) [00:21] also, why is he not banned? [00:21] ^ was about to ask. [00:22] i'll ban [00:22] he seems to be banned already, and ban evading [00:22] Any objections? [00:22] ban evasion... no contest. [00:22] I have enjoyed following ur formal procedures. Thank you for you timez [00:22] no. [00:22] Good. [00:22] thanks :) [00:23] bazhang: search for c-69-245-138-66.hsd1.in.comcast.net in the tracker [00:23] that address isn't marked as unbanned [00:23] and that is him [00:23] LjL, yep [00:23] LjL, its been known for some time. [00:24] though so has groovyorange [00:24] bazhang: as in, he's ban evading but nobody is enforcing it...? [00:24] LjL, yes, again due to mc44's sleuthing [00:25] bazhang: why don't you just ban then? ban evasion is enough of an offence [00:25] He's quite the sleuth. [00:25] sportily, sp0rt1-->nick'd to groovyorange [00:25] OH HIM [00:25] LjL: access list [00:25] BAN HIM [00:25] Myrtti: fair point [00:25] ljl not wise enough to be op in thar [00:25] but bazhang, this stuff would be helped by comments in the BT [00:26] if i see these people "mildly trolling", i won't really ban them unless there's something substantial on the BT [00:26] * Myrtti goes to bed [00:26] and having "this is the same person as the ban evader xyz" IS substantial enough [00:26] i can't add you to the access list, but i can do *that* much [00:26] LjL, okay; I made the connection very clear on several occasions to folks who *do* have access there. [00:27] bazhang: the BT is a neutral party. trust it. [00:27] LjL, in future I will confine all comments to BT [00:27] Well, they don't need to be confined there. [00:27] ie @mark and such [00:27] But, if they aren't there, they don't exist for more than a few hours. [00:28] @mark #kubuntu tarfart continued profanity attitude [00:28] The operation succeeded. [00:28] ^^ [00:29] bazhang: no, you don't have to CONFINE them there [00:29] just PUT them there [00:31] LjL, will do [00:31] I have /msg'd ubottu [00:34] bazhang: so to put things together - mc44 mentioned also mjg59? that's the same person? [00:35] LjL, ryan farmer = izanbardprince (foxconn guy who blog dueled with mjg) = daemondeb/xp/fc/one other (mkv?) [00:35] ugh, what a mess [00:36] LjL, in bt also as almightycthulhu [00:36] bazhang: "mkv" perhaps you're thinking "DaemonMDV"? [00:36] LjL, yes that is the one [00:44] bazhang: see the comments i did on my kickban in -ot for an example of what i mean when i say tracking the troll. albeit admittedly a limited example as this isn't a troll i followed myself. [00:45] LjL, point taken. its actually a nice channel when the trollage is down to a minimum. [00:56] LjL: Why yes, the cute little kitties *were* nude. I suppose your bot was right, technically. [00:57] LjL: btw, the site in question was Deviant Art. It seems to blacklist the whole thing, regardless of the specific content linked. [00:58] (watchbot that is) [00:58] tonyyarusso: no it doesn't [00:58] tonyyarusso: i've put deviantart on whitelist this morning, so it doesn't [00:59] ah, ok :P [00:59] Did at the time then [01:01] tonyyarusso: yes it did, that's what i call a "trial run" ;) [01:02] LjL: did you make the list to start off with or get one somewhere? [01:02] tonyyarusso: deviantart and imageshack are now whitelisted, and also, if a site is in the "Image sharing" category, then it won't be warned on, even if it's also in other "bad" categopries [01:02] tonyyarusso: no, i use http://domain.opendns.com [01:02] smart [01:28] there is a 'kubuntu brainstorm'... [01:29] no prizes for guessing who has got it going [01:29] ryanakca, ?? [01:29] err sorry ryanakca [01:29] oof [01:30] Pricey, either riddell or ryanakca ? [01:30] Not quite where I was aiming. [01:30] hints? [01:30] starts with a ju? std? [01:31] unless this is one of those 'need to know' type deals :) [01:32] bazhang: perhaps it's a "want to know" deal [01:32] Pricey: *shrug*, google shows people asking for one on kubuntu-users and Ubuntu brainstorm... [01:33] ryanakca, sorry for the unneccesary highlight :) [01:33] ryanakca: I'm not convinced that's why it came about. But makes me feel better :) [01:36] In #ubuntu-offtopic, Lenin_Cat said: !Lenin_Cat is Lenin_Cat dares you to oppress him. [01:36] !b > lenin_cat (lenin_cat, see the private message from ubottu) [04:05] erm.... yeah. I'm out of it. [04:11] ubottu: tell felix_da_catz about away [04:23] Mmm, that likely was premature, but I don't really want to read that site much [04:39] bazhang: I don't think so. [04:39] But, certainly suspect. [04:39] Flannel, okay thanks [04:50] bazhang: I have no idea how evilGUI was determined to be the owner [04:50] I certainly can't see any correlation [04:50] Flannel, nor can I [04:53] I certainly don't like it in there, that's for sure. [04:54] nope [05:38] ubottu: tell Andre_Gondim-afk about away [06:34] sebsebseb called the ops in #ubuntu () [07:10] looking at the BT, I'd say the auto-comment-with-hostmask think is working well [07:10] It certainly makes it easier [07:11] no errors in the log [07:11] * stdin is happy [07:33] be nice if serial ban evader in -ot were dealt with (grooveorang1) [07:37] it does seem hard to get rid of this guy [07:38] yep [09:25] In ubottu, mefisto_ said: ‏‮this is backwards‬‬ [09:27] hope that is 'this' [09:44] of cours it is... === _Dave2_ is now known as Dave2 [11:15] k [11:35] http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/20081207.html.gz groovyOrang1 (today) n=Username@217.8.236.168 [12:16] like talking to a brick wall [12:48] oh lord [12:51] hi! can you unban me from #ubuntu ? [12:51] gionnico_, never suggest that [12:51] gionnico_, not even as a joke. [12:51] !coc > gionnico_ [12:51] gionnico_, please see my private message [12:51] !guidelines | gionnico_ [12:51] gionnico_: The guidelines for using the Ubuntu channels can be found here: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/IrcGuidelines [12:52] gionnico_, read both of those. [12:52] i thought it was good for the channel to answer him so he would stop flooding [12:52] i'm gonna read ^_^ [12:52] gionnico_, it is NEVER a good idea to suggest that. [12:53] i guess someone may try it even if it was for "ruining up his system" [12:53] and then come complain: why did that command ruined up my system? [12:53] gionnico_, many new users have no idea about that command. [12:53] gionnico_, so never suggest it, ever. [12:54] ok [12:57] gionnico_, please dont idle here as per the channel topic [12:58] but i am still banned :/ [12:58] gionnico_, come back in 24 hrs to review [12:58] ok bye [13:09] if any of you are church-goers, please pray woowoo finds us a new home this week. [13:10] * mneptok is buried in rental and home sale info [14:05] Servarium: hi how can we help you? [14:06] hi Tm_T [14:07] ive been banned from #ubuntu-nl for 4 months now [14:07] i'd like to be unbanned [14:07] #ubuntu-irc for that Servarium [14:07] k [14:07] please part this channel Servarium [14:11] WatchBot called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist is filling up in #ubuntu: 731) [14:13] what is Servarium doing here? [14:14] he won't have any luck getting himself unbanned, anyway. [14:14] (oh and sorry again for the ! ops) [14:15] (no, i'm not doing it on purpose. although i enjoy it a bit) [18:02] ubottu: tell Mud|lunch about away [18:38] Erm... floodbots don't remove CTCP Versioners anymore? just ban? [19:10] ubottu: tell Dracie about away [20:22] Flannel: they never did, they always just banned [20:23] who cares whether they get removed anyway, if youùre banned you are banned [20:25] LjL: If you aren't removed, you can still get names/etc [20:26] although, I suppose anyone trying to harvest nicks won't CTCP the channel [22:04] I'm here to make friends [22:19] wth? [22:19] LjL: whats the story eith him? [22:20] jussi01: check the BT. [22:20] LjL: I was hoping to avoid that... [22:20] I wanted your 1 line view... [22:21] jussi01: my one line view? complete troll, good at it, funny in certain ways, but i'm just upset i couldn't kick him from ##windows and ##linux too [22:21] hehe, ok [22:22] jussi01: http://ircwall.snuxoll.com/quotes/80 [22:23] ahh [22:24] completely know what he is doing... they are the ones who get funny.... but still annoying [22:25] jussi01: yesterday he was in ##windows giving semi-helpful answers to people, and "mistakenly" inserting my nickname in the middle of every message [22:26] hehehehe... thats just nasty [22:26] yeah, well, perhaps he doesn't realize i have him on highlight *anyway* [22:26] freudian slip! [22:28] jpds: do you think he loves me? [23:16] everyone, i've added another feature to watchbot for the #ubuntu-it guys to make it look *inside* linked sites, and warn if they contain "bad" keyphrases such as "sudo passwd root" [23:17] do you think that might be appropriate for #ubuntu too? [23:29] sounds reasonable [23:32] i've also sent mail to the IRC ML about watchbot, to clarity its purpose etc [23:57] tritium, look at epc1 in #ubuntu - he's also in #ubuntu-us-nm