[00:37] <nsherry> Hi, I'm having trouble understanding the launchpad ppa system in relation to scripting-language programmes and was hoping someone could help me out. I'm a bit confused about how to proceed, since all the documentation I find is talking about making binary builds out of the source. Is there any way to just upload the source?
[00:40] <spiv> nsherry: in debian/ubuntu, even programs in scripting languages like python need source packages that are built into "binary" packages.
[00:41] <spiv> nsherry: although "binary" is a bit of a misnomer in that case, it's more like "distribution-ready".
[00:41] <nsherry> spiv: if I already have a system in place for building distribution-ready deb files, is there a way to just upload those?
[00:42] <spiv> Not with PPAs, AFAIK.  So just upload the source package.
[00:47] <wgrant> nsherry: You have to upload a source package.
[01:39] <stas``> hi, can somebody help me please
[01:39] <stas``> I'm trying to use launchpad's openid
[01:39] <stas``> to autentificate with an application
[01:40] <stas``> I'm using latest simple openid class written in php from phpclasses
[01:40] <stas``> I can login, it authentificates me, but all the data I can get is my nickname
[01:40] <stas``> no email or anything else
[01:40] <stas``> :(
[01:41] <stas``> is this a client side software problem ( I mean, my code doesn't suit launchpad's requirements) or It is something else
[01:41] <stas``> ?
[01:41] <mwhudson> well
[01:41] <spm> stas``: what's the host url you're using - I'll look it up in the openid register for you?
[01:42] <stas``> http://bebuntu.t.nerd.ro/index.php/login
[01:42] <mwhudson> you can ask for the email address, but it's not something that happens by default
[01:42] <stas``> you can try it here
[01:43] <stas``> well, I'm asking in optionalFields about nickname, name and email, but all I can get is nickname
[01:43] <spm> stas``: that url '... nerd.ro' isn't in the openid relying parties.... so that'd be part of the problem I suspect.
[01:44] <stas``> you're saying I should register my url somewhere?
[01:44] <spm> stas``: yes
[01:45] <stas``> and you can tell me where is that somewhere? :)
[01:46] <spm> stas``: :-) yeah - create a question here: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[01:47] <stas``> :) may I ask for a wildcard domain?
[01:47] <stas``> :)
[01:47] <stas``> ubuntu.ro for example?
[01:47] <spm> doubt it
[01:47] <stas``> the app is hosted on my server but will be used on ubuntu.ro
[01:48] <spm> to be slightly more precise. none of the other sites/urls are wildcards. dunno if "can't" or "won't". Would probably assume former with dash of latter.
[01:50] <vadi2> Hi. Why is the project name of "contact-form-7" blocked?
[01:50] <spm> stas``: useful bg reading: http://blog.launchpad.net/cool-new-stuff/openid-from-your-launchpad-profile  & https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/OpenID
[01:51] <spm> vadi2: ? possibly because no such project or team/user exists on launchpad? Do you have a URL?
[01:51] <vadi2> I am trying to create a new project with such a name
[01:52] <vadi2> both "contact-form-7" and "contact_form_7" are blocked (latter giving a first character must be a valid thing error)
[01:52] <vadi2> went with cf7, that worked, but puzzling that these two did not
[01:53] <stas``> spm: already did that http://stas.nerd.ro/blog/index.php/read/442
[02:01] <spm> vadi2: just tried on staging. appears the name 'contact-form-7' gets zapped in the internal blacklist doohicky. bummer.
[02:02] <vadi2> doohicky?
[02:02] <spm> "thing"
[02:02] <vadi2> oh
[02:02] <spm> code. case tree, probably
[02:11] <vadi2> reminded me of people who can't get emails because of their name, heh
[02:11] <vadi2> *email accounts
[02:34] <ub3rst4r> hi, does anyone know how i can have my launchpad bzr code mirrored onto sourceforge?
[11:32] <wgrant> Is staging's DB not being clobbered nightly any more?
[11:34] <wgrant> In fact, the code is days old as well.
[11:37] <intellectronica> wgrant: staging was held back over the weekend for some translations testing. a restore has been triggered and should be complete in ~12h
[11:37] <wgrant> intellectronica: Ah, thanks.
[11:41] <wgrant> intellectronica: Where are these official tag editing views hidden?
[11:42] <intellectronica> wgrant: you have a link to them from the tags portlet on projects you have permission to edit
[11:44] <wgrant> intellectronica: Not for distros, I take it.
[11:45] <intellectronica> wgrant: yes for distros. do you have edit permission for a distro?
[11:46] <wgrant> intellectronica: I'm a bug supervisor. Or do you mean real launchpad.Edit?
[11:46] <intellectronica> wgrant: the latter
[11:46] <wgrant> Ah. That's a bit strange.
[11:46] <intellectronica> but i wonder if we shouldn't let bug supervisors edit too
[11:47] <intellectronica> wgrant: would you mind filing a bug? i think we should do that
[11:47] <wgrant> It's not destructive, so I don't see why not.
[11:47] <wgrant> intellectronica: Doing so.
[11:49] <wgrant> intellectronica: Bug #347218
[11:49] <intellectronica> ouch
[11:50] <wgrant> Yes.
[11:54] <wgrant> Who turned the bug page's tag hyperlinks black?
[11:59] <cocooncrash> Is it possible to delete a ~vcs-imports branch?
[11:59] <wgrant> cocooncrash: File a Question.
[11:59] <cocooncrash> wgrant: Thanks :)
[12:09] <intellectronica> wgrant: i did. to distinguish them from official tags, which are blue
[12:10] <wgrant> intellectronica: Mrghhh. I suspect they should still be something other than black.
[12:13] <intellectronica> wgrant: what for example ... white? ;)
[12:13] <wgrant> intellectronica: Exactly! That would discourage the people who decide to tag their bugs with most of the words from the description.
[12:14] <wgrant> There used to be the green vs. blue in the Code tag cloud.
[12:14] <wgrant> But that was abolished :(
[12:29] <wgrant> Bug notification levels? Blueprint structural subscriptions? Are these new, or just in the data model for future use?
[12:32] <intellectronica> wgrant: where do you seem them, exactly?
[12:32] <intellectronica> they are not new. they are for future use
[12:33] <wgrant> intellectronica: I sighted them in a timeout traceback in a bug.
[12:33] <intellectronica> wgrant: i find it surprising that you got a traceback
[12:34] <BUGabundo> LP now allows to mark bugs as dupes of other bugs, even when having dups bugs it self? eheh
[12:34] <wgrant> intellectronica: I didn't.
[12:34] <BUGabundo> and the dups of the now duped bug are kept as dups of it, instead of the master one!
[12:34] <wgrant> BUGabundo: Are you sure it's not just a bug in the AJAX widget?
[12:34] <wgrant> There's quite a few of them.
[12:35] <intellectronica> BUGabundo: care to file a bug? i think there's some work remaining to be done on the new bug duping ui
[12:35] <BUGabundo> ajax yes
[12:35] <BUGabundo> bug 340222
[12:35] <BUGabundo> is master
[12:35] <wgrant> mpt: Normal people just get a TimeoutError instead of a super-traceback.
[12:35] <BUGabundo> I dupe https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/262536
[12:35] <BUGabundo> to it
[12:35] <BUGabundo> witch already had a dupe bug
[12:35] <anilg> A question on packages in a project: nexenta (which is a distribution with ported ubuntu packages). When a user reports a bug, he cant seem to select a package.. the following is added to the report : "the original reporter indicated the bug was in package x; however, that package was not published in Nexenta Operating System."
[12:35] <wgrant> I presume it's a bug that it gets into infinite recursion because it lets it dupe itself to a dupe of itself.
[12:35] <BUGabundo> the 3rd dupe did not get changed
[12:36] <BUGabundo> I did it manually
[12:36] <wgrant> Which is probably only allowed by BUGabundo's bug.
[12:36] <anilg> How do i publish a package to a project?
[12:36] <wgrant> Which makes me fear that the logic to forbid dupe nesting was in the browser view, not the DB.
[12:36] <BUGabundo> eheh
[12:36] <BUGabundo> let me check satging
[12:36] <BUGabundo> for infintive loop
[12:36] <wgrant> BUGabundo: Staging is a week old.
[12:37] <BUGabundo> but it would be nice to have a tree of bugs
[12:37] <BUGabundo> not every bug is a dupe of master bug
[12:37] <wgrant> That would be ugly.
[12:37] <BUGabundo> nested bugs? why?
[12:37] <BUGabundo> it can make sense
[12:37] <wgrant> Confusing!
[12:37] <BUGabundo> in some corner cases
[12:37] <BUGabundo> not all of couse
[12:38] <BUGabundo> so now, are 3rd level bugs been stored as bug of one?
[12:38] <BUGabundo> original bug or new master?
[12:38] <wgrant> There isn't meant to be such a thing as a 3rd level bug, AFAICT.
[12:38] <BUGabundo> ok
[12:38] <BUGabundo> so no nested bugs
[12:39] <BUGabundo> wgrant: should I file a bug on the ajax thingy ?
[12:39] <wgrant> Bad Bugs team is bad.
[12:39] <BUGabundo> and isn't stagging supposed to be trunk?
[12:39] <wgrant> BUGabundo: Yes. And that they're doing validation in the wrong place.
[12:39] <BUGabundo> back in a sec
[12:39] <Ursinha> BUGabundo: it's frozen for testing of a specific thing
[12:39] <wgrant> BUGabundo: Apparently it was held back for translations testing.
[12:39] <BUGabundo> ok
[12:39] <intellectronica> wgrant: pardon?
[12:40] <BUGabundo> file again what?
[12:40] <wgrant> intellectronica: The validation for not creating a dupe of a dupe is in the browser view.
[12:40] <BUGabundo> launchpad? soyeus? malone?
[12:40] <wgrant> BUGabundo: malone
[12:41] <intellectronica> wgrant: yes, i realise. please file a bug
[12:41] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/347246
[12:43] <BUGabundo> now I see stuff like:
[12:43] <BUGabundo> "(This bug has 1 duplicate) Duplicate of bug #340222"
[12:43] <BUGabundo> eheheh
[12:44] <BUGabundo> on bug 262536
[12:48] <mpt> BUGabundo, wgrant: Allowing a tree of duplicates allows a Chinese-whispers-type situation
[12:49] <BUGabundo> ah???
[12:49] <BUGabundo> bug 78596
[12:49] <wgrant> mpt: Is that why automated dupe-moving hasn't been implemented?
[12:49] <mpt> BUGabundo, where A is a duplicate of B, and B is sort of a duplicate of C, and C is pretty much a duplicate of D, but fixing D wouldn't fix A at all
[12:50] <mpt> wgrant, no, I don't think that's the reason
[12:50] <wgrant> mpt: Surely the same applies, though?
[12:50] <mpt> hm, maybe
[12:51] <wgrant> It's just the same, except more destructive.
[12:51] <mpt> With dupe-moving you could show "and these ones will be marked as a duplicate too"
[12:51] <wgrant> So it's even harder to work out what's what.
[12:51] <BUGabundo> the current situation is nice
[12:52] <BUGabundo> we just need an option asking if we want to move the dupe to MASTER
[12:52] <BUGabundo> or let it be a sub dup (nested)
[12:52] <BUGabundo> IF LP as this model view, of course
[12:52] <wgrant> Having both is crazy, I think
[12:52] <BUGabundo> which looking at current state, it handle it
[12:52] <BUGabundo> as I said, on some cases nested bugs are fne
[12:53] <BUGabundo> *fine
[12:53] <BUGabundo> not all of course... some times its just a question of moving the dupes to master
[12:53] <BUGabundo> so that's the bug above I posted
[12:59]  * wgrant just marked a bug as a dupe of bug #432423423
[13:00] <BUGabundo> lol
[13:00]  * wgrant files that bug too.
[13:01] <mpt> Huh, I can now mark a bug as a duplicate that already has duplicates
[13:02] <mpt> That used to be prevented, in the database
[13:03] <wgrant> mpt: That's what we were just discussing.
[13:03] <wgrant> mpt: It's also the cause of your supertraceback.
[13:03] <mpt> well, it could be, but not necessarily
[13:03] <mpt> It would be sufficient but not necessary
[13:04] <wgrant> It is. That's an infinite loop trying to work out the subscribers of an infinitely recursive dupe set.
[13:04] <wgrant> Ah.
[13:04]  * BUGabundo offers a cup of coffee to mpt
[13:04]  * mpt converts it to hot chocolate and thanks BUGabundo 
[13:05] <BUGabundo> sugar?
[13:05] <BUGabundo> mpt see my bug links!
[13:05] <mpt> Two, please.
[13:05] <mpt> You could have a "no cycles" rule without having a "no-chains" rule
[13:05] <BUGabundo> should make sense now that you know what I was talking about
[13:05] <wgrant> mpt: True.
[13:05] <mpt> I was under the apparently wrong impression that we had both, just to be on the paranoid side.
[13:05] <wgrant> Well, there is already a no cycles rule. It'll crash.
[13:05] <BUGabundo>  bug 347246
[13:05] <mpt> haha
[13:06] <BUGabundo> bug 347246 and its dupes , now that it is duped of 340222
[13:06] <BUGabundo> ohhh it got fixed!!!
[13:07] <wgrant> BUGabundo: Fix it back!
[13:07] <BUGabundo> ah
[13:07] <BUGabundo> now I can't demostrate it anymore
[13:07] <BUGabundo> lol
[13:10] <BUGabundo> lunch
[13:58] <noodles775> wgrant: hey, you mentioned above that you marked a bug as a dup of 432423423?
[13:59] <noodles775> I can't reproduce that (get the standard '432423423 is not a valid bug number or nick')
[13:59] <noodles775> When you get a chance, let me know the steps-to-reproduce...
[14:00] <BUGabundo> back
[14:00] <BUGabundo> did I miss anything on the nested bugs?
[14:01] <noodles775> BUGabundo: Nope, not here... I've added a comment on the bug though...
[14:01] <BUGabundo> okay
[14:02] <BUGabundo> let me process lunch's bug mail
[14:34] <stas``> hi, me back, with the same openid questions
[14:34] <stas``> as I can see launchpad openid offers teams informations through it's api
[14:35] <stas``> what are the request fileds I have to send
[14:35] <stas``> to get the teams informations?
[14:39] <BUGabundo> ok new bug with dupe ajax
[14:40] <BUGabundo> wgrant: around?
[14:40] <BUGabundo> when apport files the bug, the user gets lots of bubles on the top page... pulling the rest of the bug header down
[14:40] <BUGabundo> but the ajax for dups stays on the top block, and can get hidden
[14:41] <BUGabundo> should I file a bug for this?
[14:45] <noodles775> BUGabundo: it's here https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/347212
[14:46] <BUGabundo> nice
[14:47] <BUGabundo> some one beat me to it! eheh
[14:50] <BUGabundo> hey flacoste welcome
[14:56] <mpt> sorry, BUGabundo :-)
[14:57] <mpt> actually, your problem might be a bit different
[14:57] <mpt> Yours is about vertical placement, whereas mine is about horizontal
[14:58] <noodles775> mpt: it's the same though... it calculates to place itself in the centre of the screen,
[14:59] <noodles775> But as you noted, it does so only when the page loads...
[14:59] <noodles775> So I'm modifying it to re-calculate whenever it shows...
[15:00] <mpt> noodles775, why would that be affected by multiple attachment notifications?
[15:00] <mpt> Is it being vertically placed with respect to the actual "Mark as duplicate" link, or something like that?
[15:01] <noodles775> mpt: no shouldn't be... it just asks the yahoo library to place it in the centre of the screen.
[15:04] <mpt> oh, awesome, I found a bug in YUI? :-)
[15:04] <noodles775> mpt: perhaps... I'll let you know when I repro it here...
[15:58] <geser> cprov, bigjools: any idea why the upload of bittorrent debs failed? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24246611/upload_916219_log.txt
[15:58] <bigjools> geser: known bug, it's being fixed by cprov
[15:58] <geser> I see the build marked as "upload failed" but the packages are also published
[15:58] <geser> ok, thx
[15:59] <bigjools> the new buildd manager has a problem unfortunately
[16:00] <bigjools> geser: it's https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/347194 if you want to track it
[16:13] <lamalex> Is there a way to block a user from filing bugs on your bug tracker? We've got a user trolling us in irc and filing the same bug report, asking questions, etc.
[16:14] <intellectronica> lamalex: if the user is genuinely creating trouble we'll ban them from LP
[16:15] <intellectronica> lamalex: b.t.w did you figure the problem with your rejected bugmail eventually?
[16:15] <lamalex> intellectronica: not yet, I've been a little bit busy and haven't had time to mess with it
[16:15] <intellectronica> lamalex: likewise
[16:16] <lamalex> hmm.. I'm not sure he's bad enough for a full LP ban.. it's a shame you don't do per-project bans
[16:17] <lamalex> He's pissing /us/ off quite a bit
[16:18] <intellectronica> lamalex: well, if the user is behaving in an unacceptable way on one project and you can't resolve that by talking to her, you'd be doing other projects a favour
[16:25] <kiko> lamalex, who is it? I can intervene if you think it's necessary
[16:27] <lamalex> is it possible for you guys to easily review someones activity on LP and decide if I'm just very easily annoyed, or if he's legitimately a problem?
[16:29] <kiko> lamalex, yes, just give me URLs and I'll be able to say so
[16:32] <lamalex> ah, i meant automagically
[16:32] <lamalex> I'll have to dig around for his bug reports and stuff
[16:33] <lamalex> which I can't do at this moment. I'll collect my materials and bring you guys stuff some time later this week
[18:09] <stas``> any launchpad drupal developer here?
[18:29] <kwah> hi all
[18:30] <kwah> is there somewhere an information about bug trackers, which can use LP as an upstream bug tracker?
[18:45] <flacoste> stas``: hi, what are you looking for?
[18:46] <stas``> flacoste, hi,
[18:46] <stas``> I'm trying to authentificate an application
[18:46] <stas``> using lp's openid
[18:46] <stas``> and I found that it is not possible to use it as an account details provider
[18:46] <flacoste> kwah: do you mean two-way syncing, or mirroring in LP from the upstream tracker?
[18:46] <stas``> until I get registered my host
[18:47] <stas``> but I found the drupal's openid-teams
[18:47] <stas``> module
[18:47] <flacoste> stas``: right, you need to file a question on Launchpad requesting we send account details to your host
[18:47] <stas``> and I wonder how do they extract information from lp without being host verified
[18:47] <flacoste> stas``: they are
[18:47] <stas``> flacoste, I already asked a question of that kind
[18:48] <stas``> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/65030
[18:48] <stas``> is there any api I can use for both, authentification and account details deliveries
[18:48] <stas``> I know about python implementation, but nothing in php
[18:49] <flacoste> stas``: openid takes care of both
[18:50] <flacoste> no?
[18:50] <flacoste> stas``: what info do you need? displayname? email address?
[18:50] <stas``> flacoste, according to specifications
[18:50] <stas``> it wont deliver informations like membership or team informations
[18:51] <flacoste> we don't deliver that
[18:51] <flacoste> you can ask for membership in a team
[18:51] <flacoste> but not the list of team the user is a member of
[18:51] <kwah> flacoste, I mean be able to use bug-watch kind of functionality
[18:52] <kwah> and usage of LP as an upstream bug-tracker
[18:53] <stas``> flacoste, how then the drupal openid-teams gets information about logged in user teams
[18:54] <flacoste> kwah: i don't know if we have a list somewhere, but I know we support Trac, bugzilla, debin
[18:54] <flacoste> debian
[18:55] <flacoste> kwah: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/RemoteTrackerCoverage
[19:02] <ronny> gmb: sup?
[19:04] <fta> i don't know how the ppa size is computed but i keep hitting a limit: "Rejected: PPA exceeded its size limit (5981.00 of 5120.00 MiB)"
[19:04] <stas``> flacoste, any chance to get sone a launchpad library implementation in php?
[19:05] <flacoste> stas``: it's not in our plans, but it is available through HTTP
[19:05] <flacoste> stas``: https://help.launchpad.net/API/Hacking
[19:06] <fta> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/62386  anyone?
[19:23] <flacoste> fta: did you see herb latest reply?
[19:28] <kwah> flacoste, hm, as I understood the page above mentions exactly the opposite to what I am looking for
[19:29] <flacoste> kwah: what are you looking for?
[19:29] <kwah> the idea is to have a bug-tracker in which we may track bugs in launchpad
[19:30] <fta> flacoste, just added an answer
[19:30] <kwah> so, LP is the upstream in case we are no think of
[19:30] <kwah> *now think of
[19:33] <flacoste> kwah: in that scenario only bugzilla and trac are supported
[19:33] <flacoste> kwah: that's two-way syncing
[19:34] <kwah> flacoste, "Plugin for two-way comms" ?
[19:34] <flacoste> yes
[19:34] <kwah> thanks
[19:35] <LarstiQ> kwah: how about bts-link?
[19:35] <kwah> LarstiQ, sorry, have no clue what is that
[19:36] <LarstiQ> kwah: hmm, I thought it worked with more than just debbugs, but: http://bts-link.alioth.debian.org/
[19:40] <kwah> thanks, but it like is indeed just for debbugs
[19:41] <kwah> so, the biggest hope now is open sourced LP ?
[19:42] <flacoste> biggest hope for?
[19:42] <kwah> the thing is, that for very limited functionality like only track the status of the bug in LP but locally it also will be kinda overkill
[19:43] <kwah> may be I do not explain correctly...
[19:43] <kwah> we have an idea to run a bug-tracker system for local developers
[19:43] <kwah> in native language
[19:43] <kwah> to involve more people
[19:44] <kwah> and want to submit confirmed bugs to upstream bug-trackers
[19:44] <kwah> for ubuntu it means LP
[19:45] <kwah> and of course, want some bug-watch functionality in the local bug-tracking system
[19:45] <LarstiQ> kwah: so the bugs in your system will not be readable for upstream, per se?
[19:45] <kwah> yep
[19:45] <kwah> one-way
[19:45] <LarstiQ> ok, then reversing the link doesn't help much
[19:45] <kwah> only once, that were confirmed and resubmitted upstream
[19:46] <kwah> this is the whole idea
[19:46] <kwah> involve people who do not speak English
[19:47] <kwah> so bug-watch on LP submitted bugs is the only really need thing
[19:48] <kwah> alas there is really good translation engine somewhere, which should be based on AI, I presume :D
[19:48] <LarstiQ> feh AI
[19:48] <LarstiQ> kwah: I see the problem
[19:48] <LarstiQ> kwah: so do you have a bugtracking system already, or looking for options?
[19:49] <kwah> looking for options
[19:53] <kwah> LarstiQ, My guess, that what we are looking for is a kind unexplored use-case...
[19:53] <kwah> No-one has the answer so far :(
[19:54] <LarstiQ> kwah: how many resources do you have?
[19:55] <LarstiQ> kwah: writing something for, say, redmine shouldn't be too hard with the API and bts-link out there
[19:57] <kwah> LarstiQ, hm... I am only explorer, this is to technical for me. I may ask proper people to contact someone for further discussion...
[19:57] <LarstiQ> kwah: sure
[19:58] <CameronShorter_> Hi, I'm despot of https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis and am attempting to move UbuntuGIS from an Open to a Closed project, and in the process, I want to remove members who are not actively involved (and suggest they move to our external email list). But I can't work out how to remove imembers.
[19:58] <kwah> But I heard that they were having an idea about Mantis and possible improvement of the last...
[19:59] <maxb> CameronShorter_: What if you go to the "Show all members" link on your team page?
[19:59] <kwah> and at the page mentioned above mantis has some work scheduled
[19:59] <maxb> And edit the member's membership (little pencil on a yellow disc)
[20:05] <kwah> LarstiQ, anyway, may someone ping you on this channel or it is better to contact by other means?
[20:06] <LarstiQ> kwah: I'm just a user, not a lp person. I'm fine with discussing it though (and indeed prefer irc in channel)
[20:11] <thumper> morning
[20:12] <kwah> LarstiQ, ok, thanks
[20:15] <CameronShorter_> maxb, "Show all members" doesn't seem to have any "remove" option.
[20:15] <maxb> What about "Edit", then "Deactivate" ?
[20:15] <CameronShorter_> I'll check ...
[20:16] <maxb> I'm not actually an admin of any teams that contain anyone other than me, so I'm guessing based on what launchpad offers I can do to my own membership :-)
[20:18] <CameronShorter_> maxb, thanks, that seems to work. (I didnt' notice the yellow pen before).
[20:19] <maxb> Many people don't :-)
[21:40] <fta> flacoste, what is the status of https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/62386 now? can I resend what has been rejected?
[21:41] <flacoste> fta: did you delete the problematic packages?
[21:42] <flacoste> fta: if yes, i suppose that you can upload again
[21:42] <fta> there's no problematic package, it's expected
[21:42] <flacoste> fta: right, sorry, i misread your reply
[21:47] <flacoste> fta: ok,you should now have 10G
[21:48] <flacoste> fta: but at 400M the dbg package, that will eat up fast
[21:48] <flacoste> fta: so make sure to obsolete older ones fast also
[21:49] <fta> 400M ??
[21:49] <fta> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 105909114 2009-03-23 15:42 /var/cache/apt/archives/chromium-browser-dbg_2.0.171.0~svn20090322r12268-0ubuntu1~ucd2_amd64.deb
[21:49] <fta> that's 105M
[21:50] <fta> oh, -testsuite
[21:50] <fta> hmm
[21:50] <fta> there are a lot of binaries in there
[21:51] <fta> "obsolete older ones fast"? what do you mean?
[22:18] <fuks> yo
[22:18] <fuks> is possible to host debian repo on launchpad ?
[22:18] <fuks> like ubuntu repo i host now
[22:19] <fuks> because i dont know any site to host own debian repo :(
[22:20] <maxb> fuks: No, it isn't.
[22:21] <maxb> (Any webserver can *host* a Debian repo, though. The tricky bit is building the packages across multiple architectures)