[00:00] no [00:01] ok [00:01] extract the dongle, and replug it [00:01] i go test that now [00:01] i back soon [00:02] tanks for the tips [00:02] cya [00:03] 11904 firefox-3.1 1836 338 775 676 47 (Unknown) [00:03] 23216 firefox-3.2 308 25 94 162 27 (Unknown) [00:03] 33342 firefox-3.5 74 2 0 72 0 (Unknown) [00:03] 37312 firefox-3.6 41 6 0 35 0 (Unknown) [00:03] so i guess my ppa has a lot more users than -daily [00:04] but that's still nice for -daily though, 74, probably a lot more as we have no idea who is using popcon [00:05] asac, ^^ [00:10] back [00:10] fta is working [00:10] great [00:10] excellent [00:10] they connect smootly [00:10] i activate the option to connet on startup [00:10] an they connect ok [00:11] even afther a reboot [00:12] later on i back to give you feedback [00:12] ok [00:12] in another day [00:12] cya a thanks [00:12] cu [00:21] so it works at lesat [00:21] fta: can you drop a comment that the new rules works for you? [00:22] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/346835/comments/11 [00:22] Ubuntu bug 346835 in network-manager "MASTER - modems not detected - udev prober broken (Was: Huawei e169 doesn't connect + Globetrotter 3G+ card not recognized anymore)" [Critical,In progress] [00:22] thats the rules i posted [00:37] asac, it works only with n-m from the ppa, not with n-m from jaunty [00:49] oops http://paste.ubuntu.com/138633/ [00:50] well, i'll have a closer look tomorrow [00:50] do we need a fresher nspr? [00:55] asac, http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/956071116564 [01:14] fta: yes. the ppa thing has huawei fixes [01:14] anyway. off. tomorrow i will u pload new NM [01:16] i meant, the prober in jaunty doesn't support --vid, while in the ppa, it does, so you conf + jaunty will not work, it's visible if you debug udev [01:16] youR [01:17] Mar 26 22:20:26 voyager udevd-event[27664]: IMPORT 'nm-modem-probe --vid 0x12d1 --pid 0x1003 --usb-interface 01 --driver option --delay 3000 --export /dev/.tmp-char-188:1' /lib/udev/rules.d/77-nm-probe-modem-capabilities.rules:11 [01:17] Mar 26 22:20:26 voyager udevd-event[27664]: 'nm-modem-probe --vid 0x12d1 --pid 0x1003 --usb-interface 01 --driver option --delay 3000 --export /dev/.tmp-char-188:1' [01:17] Mar 26 22:20:26 voyager udevd-event[27664]: '/lib/udev/nm-modem-probe' (stderr) '/lib/udev/nm-modem-probe: unrecognized option '--vid'' [01:17] Mar 26 22:20:26 voyager udevd-event[27664]: '/lib/udev/nm-modem-probe' returned with status 1 [02:38] <[reed]> asac / fta: getting 3.0.8 ready for tomorrow? [07:55] ? [07:56] there is a add-on named footiefox which doesn't work with firefox in ubuntu but when i tried to use it with windows it works. [09:24] guud morning [09:39] [reed]: tomorrow? [09:39] so today? [09:39] <[reed]> asac: today [09:39] <[reed]> yes [09:39] <[reed]> 4pm PDT [09:39] pfff [09:39] <[reed]> maybe earlier [09:39] you are really odd. we have a no-security update on friday policy [09:39] i thought you even had that too [09:40] <[reed]> we have a no release policy on Friday in general [09:40] <[reed]> but for security releases, anything goes [09:40] <[reed]> our objective is to get the fix to our users ASAP [09:40] yes. and then you leave them with a regression over weekend [09:40] <[reed]> holding off because it's Friday is silly [09:41] <[reed]> if they're using Firefox, they will get updated [09:41] <[reed]> over the weekend [09:41] fta: did the daily gwibber broke? [09:41] http://paste.ubuntu.com/138835/ [09:42] [reed]: last i heard was that you released on monday ... personally i dont think its really wise to do stuff in a hurry. but well [09:42] i will be ready then [09:43] <[reed]> you'll be late ;) [09:43] <[reed]> but ok [09:43] fta https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/349462 [09:43] Ubuntu bug 349462 in gwibber "ImportError: /var/lib/python-support/python2.6/gtk-2.0/glib/_glib.so: undefined symbol: PyUnicodeUCS4_DecodeUTF8" [Undecided,New] [09:43] [reed]: why would i be late ;)? [09:43] i will now bump up this stuff [09:44] BUGabundo, donno.. yet [09:44] Installed: 1.0.1~bzr274-0ubuntu1~daily1 [09:44] Candidate: 1.0.1~bzr276-0ubuntu1~daily1 [09:44] <[reed]> asac: you said you're going to release on Monday still? [09:44] <[reed]> with us releasing today [09:44] 276 here [09:44] [reed]: no. i said that mozilla wanted to release on monday a day a ago ;) [09:45] looks like a problem in python-gobject more than in gwibber. [09:45] <[reed]> asac: yeah, that changed late today [09:45] <[reed]> release team met and decided to push it up [09:46] yeah. i can see that ;) [09:46] nevermind [09:46] thanks for the info ;) [09:47] <[reed]> :) [09:47] bbl [09:47] going out getting supplies [10:06] <[reed]> asac: urgency=low for a security update? [10:06] <[reed]> I guess I don't understand how you all decide that [10:07] [reed]: its not used ;) [10:07] [reed]: its about something completely different - which is not used in ubuntu [10:07] <[reed]> ah, k [10:07] <[reed]> ok [10:07] in debian you upload stuff with urgency=low -> means 10 days in unstable [10:07] with medium -> 5 days (without RC bug) in unstable [10:07] high -> 2 days (without RC bug) [10:07] <[reed]> ah [10:07] <[reed]> interesting [10:07] critical -> 1 day without RC bu [10:07] so its just for the "unstable/sid" uploads in debian [10:08] <[reed]> k [10:08] we usually set urgency to critical in debian for security updates even if its for stable [10:08] but in ubuntu we just dont use it :) [10:08] (well at least i think) [10:08] its definitly technically irrelevant [10:09] <[reed]> did you mean USN-745-1 [10:09] <[reed]> instead of USB ? [10:13] sigh [10:15] but good catch ;) [10:24] * asac uploaded NM [10:25] to ubuntu/jaunty [10:26] hmm ... looks really unlikely we can come up with builds today [10:26] the builders are completely busted [10:26] https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ [10:26] ia64 241 builds waiting in queue [10:26] amd64 34 builds waiting in queue [10:26] lets hope [10:27] <[reed]> shouldn't you be able to prioritize? [10:32] yeah [10:32] we will do that [11:14] BUGabundo: heh. you were the first to report the python bustage ;)? [11:14] yep [11:14] im always there [11:14] eheh [11:14] just 2nd bug of the day [11:14] and I had to leave office [11:14] LOL [11:14] how nice for all those new beta users!! EHEHEEH [11:33] BUGabundo: tell them to wait a bit with filing bugs ;) [11:34] ehehe [11:34] I wish I could [11:34] we will see 403 bugs too [11:34] 403? [11:34] HTTP status? [11:39] files have been striped of read permittions [12:19] asac: fta that guy from yesterday with 3g dongle e220 says it fixed for him [12:19] yes [12:20] hmm [12:20] bug found [12:20] he reports he is now getting the ISP on the wizard [12:23] so whats the bug then? [12:23] he went to lunch [12:23] says will report latter [12:24] but seems that the wizard will not provides phone companies as it used to [12:24] * asac lunch === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [13:22] mozilla 485217 [13:22] Mozilla bug 485217 in XSLT "Exploitable crash in [@txMozillaXSLTProcessor::TransformToDoc ]" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485217 [13:42] oh fuck this === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [14:18] gnomefreak: language please!!!! [14:19] yeah. otherwise we will raise a two minute ban ;) [14:19] :) [14:19] voluntarily ;) [14:19] i think i got hg to work :) [14:19] so happy but i want it to build a tarball not a binary [14:20] gnomefreak: what are you dpoig? [14:20] doesnt moz-devscripts work? [14:20] usually vcs systems have a "export" operation or something to export tarballs [14:20] failing the build. no it wont work ive tried hacking that already [14:20] nowadays [14:20] but i am not sure you really want that [14:20] gnomefreak: which package? [14:21] sunbird 1.x [14:21] make failed i forgot a build option [14:21] gnomefreak: where is sunbird 1 in hg? url? [14:22] asac: its in comcental give me a minute [14:22] asac: http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/calendar/ is that what you are looking for? [14:23] reading on mxr atm [14:24] gnomefreak: seems you need the same tarball that tbird uses ;) [14:24] thats not a standalone tree there [14:24] yeah its the same tarball ;) [14:25] asac: i know comm-central IMHO is worthless they should have kept it on ftp.... [14:25] asac: rename everything in tarball? [14:25] gnomefreak: heh [14:25] you cannot compare apples with cars ;) [14:25] ftp is something different [14:25] releases get pused to ftp [14:25] development happens in tree ;) [14:25] gnomefreak: why rename everything in tarball? i dont understand that [14:26] gnomefreak: you probably just need to rename the tarball itself [14:26] oh [14:26] nothing inside i would think [14:26] gnomefreak: just copy the moz client files from thunderbird 3.0 branch [14:26] and rename the project to sunbird or something [14:26] should be straight forward [14:26] ok that sounds almost too easy [14:27] gnomefreak: tarball wise its eas [14:27] gnomefreak: have you talked to sunbird folks [14:27] ok updates than that. i might look at dist_clean patch today maybe tomorrow [14:27] or why do you think that the comm-central tree actually works? [14:27] asac: they dont relelase nightly tarballs [14:28] asac: thats where they sent me to build it [14:28] i know not very helpful [14:30] everything queues up behind the firefox/xulrunner builds ;) [14:35] its gonna be a while ill be back soon [14:42] asac: please user !CHANNEL on identica [14:42] BUGabundo: hmm [14:42] BUGabundo: feel free to redent ;) [14:42] next time [14:42] to broadcast to a #group [14:42] you must be part of the group to send to it [14:43] I always redent your dents! lol [14:56] asac: you are already getting helpers to improve startpage [14:56] eheh [15:08] BUGabundo: yes i know. i am part of !ubuntu ;) [15:09] thanks [15:10] asac: shouldnt the start page have ubuntu version on it other than the page name? [15:10] 9.04 is only in URL bar [15:19] gnomefreak: its not my decision ;) [15:19] i only forwarded the news i got through other channels [15:19] oh [15:23] gnomefreak: but if you give me comments i will forward them back for sure ;) [15:24] thats kind of simple. should be known what you are running :) [15:24] this is taking too long :( [15:29] do you guys think I should apply to Ubuntu Member? could I get your support? [15:30] wouldnt do that in +1 [15:30] yeah [15:30] BUGabundo: make a wiki and edit it with stuff you do/did [15:31] but there is were I'm more active [15:31] i have to update mine sooner or later [15:31] BUGabundo: its offtopic for there [15:32] ok lunch while this fails to build :) [15:33] eheh [15:33] asac: im gonna have to change everything in /debian example debian/control and im sure renaming everything from thunderbird to sunbird [15:33] i will work on that after lunch [15:34] oh no i dont [15:34] forgot the branch is already for sunbird :) [15:35] btw Python is not fixed [15:35] nevermind that for a min i think i know the problem [15:36] gnomefreak: hmm. i meant you should start with our sunbird branch [15:36] and add the mozclient files there [15:36] do we have a branch for sunbird 1.x? [15:36] not yet [15:36] asac: once i get it working ill push to one [15:38] it is python i think [16:24] asac: can you look at bug 117132 i have a weird feeling about that. did firefox introduce something new about themes in 3.0 reason we cant use firefox-themes package right? [16:24] Launchpad bug 117132 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox ignores gnome theme's specific menu bar text color" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/117132 [16:56] asac: why do you guys still support mozilla packages for dapper ??? [16:57] BUGabundo: because we support dapper? [16:57] dapper is still supported for a few month for desktop [16:57] and another 2 and a half years for servers [16:58] i dream every day about those going away [16:58] ;) [16:58] gutsy will be EOL before dapper fwif ;) [16:58] fwiw [17:00] eheh [17:00] I forgot about server [17:00] but desktop ??? [17:00] really? [17:00] yeah. its 6.06 [17:00] didn't it end around 8.04.1 ? [17:00] 3 years support for LTS [17:00] bah [17:00] no [17:00] ok [17:00] never mind [17:00] I'm tired [17:01] no problem [17:01] too much writing on my wiki page to apply to ubuntu member [17:01] its really long and for usres that follow head its even longer ;) [17:02] ehehe [17:02] * BUGabundo is already waiting for koala toolchains [17:13] \o/ wiki page done! please check, comment and/or write a Testimonial https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BUGabundo === fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp [18:00] bbl [18:00] asac: I may put my hands on a few more 3G dongles [18:00] will test and also see if hibernate/suspend/resume works [18:00] bye [20:04] back [20:06] hey fta [20:08] ok, this time, this is it, i will unsubscribe from that guy, he dents too much [20:08] me ? [20:08] no [20:08] ohh [20:08] some one is worse then me? [20:09] far worse [20:09] ok [20:09] dinner [20:09] bbl [20:10] ~30 dents a day [20:10] avg since he subscribed [20:22] [reed], mozilla bug 385263 broke my build. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24419503/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090327r26633%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [20:22] Mozilla bug 385263 in GFX: Thebes "[pango] we call FT_Open_Face twice per font" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385263 [20:24] well, maybe not this commit as it seems old [20:26] ohoh, pango 0.1.22 -> 0.1.24 [20:35] Hi, just updated firefox and it won't stop telling me that the browser has been updated and needs restarted... [20:35] bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/270303 [20:35] Ubuntu bug 270303 in ubufox "MASTER - firefox (intrepid): "your browser has been updated and needs to be restarted"" [High,In progress] [20:35] anything I can do to help add more details to the problem? [20:46] yeah fta I'm not that bad [20:49] BUGabundo, seems you're at ~26 avg per day, bad too [20:49] am I? [20:49] really? [20:49] you did the math on it? eheh [20:49] * BUGabundo checks identica stats [20:49] 7044 since 4 Jul 2008 [20:50] yeah I noticed [20:50] doing it just now [20:50] 3G Bug huawei e160 fixed it works !!!! [20:51] I read it too [20:51] blogdudel: are you fta spammer ? eheh [20:52] no [20:52] what ? spammer no what do you mean ? [20:52] never mind [20:52] ;) [20:53] in german "hä was is los " ok [21:00] [reed], mozilla Bug 485597 [21:00] Mozilla bug 485597 in GFX: Thebes "pango API change broke trunk" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485597 [21:01] <[reed]> fta: k, poke me later? kinda about to start a release, and it's going to get really hectic :( [21:01] <[reed]> fta: request blocking 1.9.1 and such [21:02] [reed], bz reacted to it in #dev.. [21:02] [reed], not sure he'll take it or what [21:08] [reed], is 3.1b3 also impacted by the bug causing all the fuss in the 3.0 branch? I notice we still have b3+build2 in jaunty/universe :( [21:09] <[reed]> yes [21:09] :P [21:10] [reed], what about those who took b3 from you? are you rushing to bake a b4 too, or a b3++ or nothing at all? [21:52] <[reed]> fta: nothing at all [21:52] <[reed]> afaik [21:52] <[reed]> Firefox 3.0.8 is out [21:52] :( [22:31] asac: you around a scrolling question === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [22:51] [reed]: no advisories pubilshed though ;) ... http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/ [22:51] <[reed]> asac: dveditz is working on it [22:52] [reed]: ah. any ETA? (security team is waiting ;)) [22:52] <[reed]> asac: the drafts are on s-g@ [22:52] <[reed]> except for a typo [22:52] <[reed]> if you need to see them [22:53] <[reed]> I think dveditz is pushing them now [22:53] great [22:54] asac, do you alsa have that: http://paste.ubuntu.com/139224/ ? [22:55] i have tons of those, basically, all /usr/share/gnome/help/ [23:00] wait a sec [23:00] i have a bunch of dapper/gutsy/intrepid chroot apps confusing my desktop experience :) [23:02] fta: in .xsession-errors? [23:02] oh during upgrade [23:02] well i can try reinstall that package [23:03] it's not the 1st time i see that [23:05] fta: hmm. no ... i dont have that issue [23:05] fta: maybe you have some custom applets? [23:05] nope [23:05] i mean some other packages that have applets :) [23:05] more than just the applets you get installed by default [23:06] fta asac quick question [23:06] what is the current status of bug 187313 ? [23:06] Launchpad bug 187313 in firefox "[MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187313 [23:06] is it fixed on any ppa? [23:06] I was just asked by a friend on HackLaViva [23:08] ///usr/share/gnome/help/about-ubuntu/C/about-ubuntu.xml:7: I/O warning : failed to load external entity "/usr/share/gnome/help/libs/gnome-menus-C.ent" [23:08] fta@ix:~ $ l /usr/share/gnome/help/libs/gnome-menus-C.ent [23:08] ls: cannot access /usr/share/gnome/help/libs/gnome-menus-C.ent: No such file or directory [23:08] fta@ix:~ $ l /usr/share/ubuntu-docs/libs/gnome-menus-C.ent [23:08] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23177 2009-03-27 11:51 /usr/share/ubuntu-docs/libs/gnome-menus-C.ent [23:08] !pastebin [23:08] pastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. The Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu.com (make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic) [23:08] LOL [23:09] so there's something weird with ghelp or ubuntu-docs [23:09] <[reed]> asac -- http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html [23:09] BUGabundo1, no idea, i lost track of this bug a long time ago [23:12] fta: not even if it is fixed in ppa? [23:14] BUGabundo1, i said "no idea" :) [23:15] ok ok [23:16] asac: what is the current status of bug 187313 ? [23:16] Launchpad bug 187313 in firefox "[MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187313 [23:16] is it fixed on any ppa? [23:20] asac, ok, found it, in my case, /usr/share/gnome/help/libs is an empty dir, not a link to ../../ubuntu-docs/libs [23:24] [reed]: fyi http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/ has MFSA 2009-12 listed twice [23:24] [reed]: though the links work right [23:25] <[reed]> jdstrand: I'll fix that right up [23:27] <[reed]> committed... should go live in the next 30 min. or so [23:27] cool [23:37] <[reed]> jdstrand: see the second paragraph on http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-12.html -- we didn't have much as far as who the ubuntu guy was, so we could only put a first name [23:39] [reed]: heh, yeah. he didn't put too much in LP :) [23:39] I could set his location for him though :P [23:40] <[reed]> we'll be happy to update the security adv if he wants to give his last name [23:41] * jdstrand nods