[00:09] <mib_j9ca7w9p> http://www.meine-nackte-ex.net/?uid=89015
[02:32] <flixr> hi
[02:33] <flixr> I have on small problem on lauchpad: When I try to import my OpenPGP key via the fingerprint it says: The key B421DE2FCF2FD020A387E32AF50471C9A0FC4120 has already been imported.
[02:34] <flixr> But it doesn't show up anywhere and I can't become an Ubuntero
[02:35] <wgrant> flixr: You seem to have two accounts - https://edge.launchpad.net/~f-ruess has that key.
[02:36] <wgrant> You can merge them at https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge.
[02:38] <flixr> thanks wgrant
[02:39] <wgrant> np
[02:48] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/bohrium seems to have a problem. 3h+ to build a package that usually takes ~30 min, and it's still not complete..
[02:50] <wgrant> fta: Fortunately there's about 3 billion PPA builders now.
[02:52] <fta> wgrant, just thought i should report it, as it's suspicious. it's not really that i'm waiting for this build ;P
[02:53] <wgrant> fta: I guess the relevant people will notice on Monday.
[03:48] <MTecknology> hrm - I've been thinking about it and I really don't like this new single column layout in launchpad
[03:48] <AskHL> Hello.  I would like to set the bzr launchpad login with the bzr launchpad-login command.  It then says: bzr: ERROR: https://launchpad.net/%7EAskHL/%2Bsshkeys is permanently redirected to https://launchpad.net/~askhl/+sshkeys .  Can anyone help?
[03:49] <AskHL> As I see it, it doesn't provide any information about what's *actually* wrong or how to fix it.
[03:49] <MTecknology> AskHL: what's your lp account?
[03:50] <AskHL> AskHL
[03:50] <MTecknology> There’s no page with this address in Launchpad.
[03:50] <MTecknology> https://edge.launchpad.net/~askhl
[03:51] <AskHL> Uhh, I thought that was my name.  But evidently it's something else.  I'll look at it, thank you
[03:52] <AskHL> (The name it reports is AskHL, but I realize that may not be the actual username)
[03:53] <AskHL> Ah, now it's "askhl".  And everything works.  Thanks again.
[03:54] <MTecknology> yup
[04:06] <wgrant> MTecknology: I think the single-column layout looks a lot better.
[04:06] <wgrant> Particularly now it is deployed more consistently.
[04:09] <MTecknology> wgrant: it is more consistent and in some ways cleaner - but I miss how it was
[04:10] <MTecknology> wgrant: I really like how the project groups are laid out
[04:10] <wgrant> It's possible that the old team page layout was just bad, but the new team page definitely looks much better.
[04:10] <wgrant> And will look even better when the bugs are fixed.
[04:11] <cody-somerville> Is there anyone around who can rename the sion project to gigolo?
[04:12] <wgrant> MTecknology: It looks cluttered to me.
[04:12] <wgrant> But that could just be the unaligned dotted lines.
[04:12] <MTecknology> the unaligned part is bad - but the rest of it feels clean and organized
[04:18] <MTecknology> wgrant: <style> div.right { padding-top: 13px; } div.products { padding-top: 13px; } </style>
[04:18] <MTecknology> wgrant: I'd say that would clean it up nicely
[04:20] <wgrant> MTecknology: That is better, but I think I still prefer the single-column one.
[04:25] <MTecknology> x
[04:28] <MTecknology> wgrant: I suppose I'll get used to it and in time forget what the old layout was like :P
[04:29] <MTecknology> I think the reason I don't like it is just because it makes the pages really long and feels kinda disorganized
[04:44] <wgrant> MTecknology: Once you've lived through a few complete LP UI redesigns, you get used to it.
[04:47] <TualatriX> Hi, Does anyone know how to make a daily-build bot for launchpad PPA?
[04:50] <wgrant> TualatriX: You might want to look at something like AutoPPA.
[04:51] <TualatriX> wgrant: cool! Thank you! i think autoppa is what I want.
[04:56] <MTecknology> wgrant: is there any way to donate? or does the whole ubuntu/laucnhpad thing not work like that?
[05:24] <wgrant> MTecknology: I don't know of any donation setups for Ubuntu or Launchpad.
[05:26] <MTecknology> wgrant: I made my first donation today
[05:55] <calc> i think i found a bug
[05:56] <cody-somerville> calc, o'rly?
[05:56] <calc> i just linked an upstream bug to bug 174212 and it claimed it was linked by bugs 229839 bug 247485 bug 267371, which it is not, those bug reports just mention it in their comments
[05:56] <calc> perhaps the wording should not be linked if the use case is to show which bugs might refer to the same bug?
[05:57] <calc> eg "blah also links to the added bug watch (gnome-bugs #574968)."
[05:58] <calc> i'll file a bug report with screenshots its probably just a confusing wording issue
[05:58] <cody-somerville> calc, Are you using edge?
[05:59] <calc> no i accidentally wasn't :\
[05:59] <calc> cody-somerville: do you know if that was something fixed recently?
[06:00] <cody-somerville> I was thinking maybe it was some new weird feature
[06:00] <calc> ok
[06:00] <cody-somerville> I've never heard of launchpad claiming a bug to be already linked to an upstream bug simply by someone pasting a link to it in a comment.
[06:00] <calc> i should be using edge but was sent a link that opened in regular launchpad
[06:00] <cody-somerville> hmm... launchpad should automatically redirect you
[06:00] <calc> yea it sounds like a nice feature but shouldn't use the word link if it is intended feature
[06:01] <cody-somerville> Indeed.
[06:01] <calc> cody-somerville: do i need to set something in my profile to do that?
[06:01] <cody-somerville> If you're a beta tested, launchpad generally doesn't let you go to the normal launchpad unless you visit the front page and disable automatic redirection for two hours.
[06:01] <cody-somerville> *tester
[06:02] <cody-somerville> calc, it wouldn't hurt to file a bug :)
[06:02] <calc> ah hmm
[06:03] <calc> i don't know why it lets me go to regular lp then
[06:03] <calc> maybe using bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/foo causes it not to redirect?
[06:05] <calc> maybe its the word links vs has a bug watch(?)
[06:05] <calc> dunno i'll file the report and see if it is intended behavior
[06:17]  * calc headed to bed, bbl
[07:00] <wgrant> Although calc's gone - Launchpad will automatically create a link between the Launchpad bug and another bug whenever it sees a URL in a comment to a known bugtracker.
[07:00] <wgrant> It's not linked to a task, but it's still there.
[07:01] <wgrant> IMO the check should only look for those bugs which have the link attached to a task.
[07:07] <alkisg> ...still trying to figure out how translations work in launchpad: gnome-app-install uses launchpad for translations (https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/gnome-app-install), so why doesn't it show up in the list of projects with translations in launchpad? (https://translations.launchpad.net/translations/+products-with-translations?batch=300)
[07:20] <lifeless> alkisg: the first url is in the distro - ubuntu is using lp to translate gnome-app-install; the second url is the lp upstream view, and gnome-app-install doesn't use that
[07:20] <lifeless> (if its not in the list :))
[07:21] <alkisg> lifeless: In https://launchpad.net/gnome-app-install I see that gnome-app-install uses launchpad for translations... ???
[07:22] <wgrant> That's why I didn't answer.
[07:22] <wgrant> It has me confused.
[07:22] <wgrant> https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/gnome-app-install
[07:22] <wgrant> Does it share its templates with the Ubuntu package?
[07:23] <wgrant> I wasn't aware that a product could reference a source package for its translations...
[07:24]  * alkisg is totally lost with launchpad - I don't even understand wgrant's questions/notes :)
[07:25] <wgrant> alkisg: Projects and source packages are different concepts - but the gnome-app-install project seems to list translations from the gnome-app-install source package.
[07:26] <alkisg> But gnome-app-install source doesn't have the translations tab enabled ( https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-app-install )
[07:26] <wgrant> And even though the project is marked as using Translations officially, it doesn't show up on the list.
[07:26] <wgrant> alkisg: Right, that's looks a bit strange, but it's just because you need /ubuntu/jaunty/... rather than just /ubuntu
[07:26] <alkisg> Ah, ok
[07:26] <wgrant> Hmmm. So it looks like there's a feature to share the translations between the two.
[07:26] <wgrant> How confusing.
[07:27] <alkisg> Let me try with a different package...
[07:28] <savvas> so you mean the project translation is a link of the ubuntu source package translation?
[07:28] <lifeless> alkisg: oh interesting
[07:28] <wgrant> savvas: Yes.
[07:28] <lifeless> perhaps it just doesn't have a non-distro template uploaded
[07:28] <wgrant> Right.
[07:29] <wgrant> That was my thought.
[07:29] <lifeless> as gnome-app-install is being developed for the distro folk may be slack on the upstream front :)
[07:29] <wgrant> That page looks for templates rather than the official flag.
[07:29] <wgrant> lifeless: The Translations setup page for a project without templates suggests that you either upload a template or link it to a package.
[07:30] <wgrant> So not having any upstream templates seems to be a valid case.
[07:30] <wgrant> So +products-with-translations is buggy.
[07:30] <lifeless> I suspect a bug needs filing ;P)
[07:31] <alkisg> So the same goes for https://launchpad.net/update-manager ?
[07:31] <alkisg> It also doesn't show up in +products-with-translations
[07:31] <savvas> someone should notify mvo :)
[07:31] <wgrant> Yep - it again has no templates, and is really Ubuntu-only.
[07:34] <alkisg> So, where should a bug be reported? (if someone can handle this, please do!)
[07:34] <savvas> hey it's true, if you click on the link of a language, it sends you to ubuntu/jaunty
[07:56] <savvas> bug 350760
[07:57] <savvas> I hope it's clearly put :)
[11:11] <wgrant> gmb: I thought the activity interleaving was already pretty awesome... but it's going to get more awesome?
[13:00] <meoblast001> hi
[13:00] <meoblast001> i have a massive problem
[13:00] <meoblast001> all my times on commits are wrong
[13:01] <meoblast001> it says i made a commit in 11 hours
[13:01] <meoblast001> that makes no freaking sense
[13:01] <meoblast001> a few minutes ago it said i made a commit in 2002 that i just made
[13:02] <meoblast001> crap
[13:02] <meoblast001> i set it to 8 pm
[13:42] <meoblast001> hi im a little angry
[13:42] <meoblast001> why do both my comptuers come up as different people http://www.ohloh.net/p/amethyst-mm/contributors
[13:42] <meoblast001> i'm 1 account
[13:42] <meoblast001> i'm the same person
[13:42] <meoblast001> this shouldn't be happening
[13:42] <meoblast001> i've been overwritting my bzr repo since yesterday
[13:44] <meoblast001> so i have to make all my commits on my laptop from now on?
[13:47] <meoblast001> this is wrong http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mysticgalaxies/grandwing/devel/revision/17
[13:47] <meoblast001> it should say Braden Walters
[13:47] <meoblast001> not meoblast at aol
[13:49]  * meoblast001 bangs head off desk
[13:50] <Ursinha> meoblast001: you have to sign your commits the same way
[13:50] <meoblast001> ?
[13:50] <meoblast001> $ bzr whoami Braden Walters <meoblast@aol.com> | bash: syntax error near unexpected token `newline'
[13:50] <Ursinha> I commit from two different machines to lp and they look the same
[13:50] <meoblast001> hmm
[13:50] <Ursinha> my commits are signed
[13:51] <meoblast001> how do you sign them
[13:51] <Ursinha> have this setup on .bazaar/bazaar.conf
[13:51] <meoblast001> no
[13:51] <Ursinha> I mean, I do :)
[13:51] <meoblast001> how do i do that
[13:51] <meoblast001> this is stressful
[13:51] <Ursinha> it's simple
[13:52] <Ursinha> wait
[13:52] <meoblast001> Ursinha: do i have to resign every package?
[13:52] <meoblast001> commit*
[13:52] <meoblast001> and redo the entire bzr repo from the bottom
[13:52] <Ursinha> meoblast001: you're talking about commits, right?
[13:52] <Ursinha> commits to bzr branches?
[13:53] <meoblast001> Ursinha: yes
[13:53] <meoblast001> Ursinha: commis
[14:01] <spiv> meoblast001: bzr whoami "Braden Walters <meoblast@aol.com>"
[14:02] <meoblast001> spiv: thanks
[14:02] <meoblast001> think i got it fixed now
[14:02] <meoblast001> i panic a lot when things are broken like this
[14:02] <spiv> meoblast001: the quotes are important; they tell bash to treat it as a single argument and to not try to interpret < or > as shell metacharacters.
[14:02] <meoblast001> spiv: i just went in and changed the file manually
[14:02] <spiv> You can also edit the ~/.bazaar/bazaar.conf directly
[14:02] <meoblast001> to match the one on my laptop
[14:03] <spiv> You can always check the result of a commit with "bzr log", btw, rather than pushing to Launchpad to figure out if it looks right.
[14:04] <meoblast001> ahh ic
[14:04] <meoblast001> spiv: thanks for the help though.... i've gtg now... have to go to church soon
[16:09] <gmb> wgrant: Thanks :). Moar awesome to follow, though...
[16:28] <Tiefflieger> hi :-)
[16:32] <Tiefflieger> I'm trying to initial push data to a branch just registered on launchpad, but it hangs, can anybody help? :-)
[16:32] <Tiefflieger> errr
[16:32] <Tiefflieger> disregard that, it just succeeded
[16:33] <Tiefflieger> (waited several times over 15 mins without network activity)
[16:33] <Tiefflieger> thanks anyway ;)
[17:22] <flixr> hi, I requested a CVS import a couple of days ago and accidentally specified an invalid URL. Now it has been marked as invalid but I would like to know if and when this branch will be removed so I can request a new import for under paparazzi/trunk.
[17:40] <Tiefflieger> flixr: You should be able to delete branches by yourself, I think? But I don't know anything about these cvs-imports...
[17:41] <mwhudson> flixr: which branch?
[17:41] <mwhudson> i can delete it for you
[17:41] <flixr> https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/paparazzi/trunk
[17:42] <mwhudson> flixr: it's gone
[17:42] <flixr> thx!
[17:42] <mwhudson> we need to make removed dud imports much easier
[17:42] <flixr> jep
[17:43] <flixr> And I also requested a merge of my old forgotten account f-ruess into my new one: flixr. I confirmed the mail addresses but I still can't import my gpg key. Does the account merge happen automatically or does someone still need to do it and I just have to wait?
[19:00] <flixr> hi, I have a question regarding merging accounts
[19:00] <flixr> I also requested a merge of my old forgotten account f-ruess into my new one: flixr. I confirmed the mail addresses but I still can't import my gpg key. Does the account merge happen automatically or does someone still need to do it and I just have to wait?
[19:01] <mwhudson> no, it should be ok
[19:04] <flixr> mwhudson, any idea why I still can't register my gpg then? I doubt I forgot about another account I had and couldn't find one.
[19:04] <holzmodem> hi, I try to build a jaunty kernel+linuxphc patch INSIDE Launchpad PPA (local it works!), but the buildprocess reports "EE: Previous or current ABI file missing!" I prepare the source with debuild -S -sd, and this removes the missing abi files, how can I keep the abi files or fix the problem??
[20:38] <jelmer> mwhudson: hi
[20:43] <mwhudson> jelmer: hello
[20:46] <thumper> morning
[20:47] <mwhudson> jelmer: have you seen my various missives over the last few days?
[20:48] <jelmer> hi thumper
[20:48] <thumper> hi jelmer
[20:48] <jelmer> mwhudson: not sure - what are missives ? :-)
[20:49] <mwhudson> jelmer: well, messages
[20:49] <mwhudson> jelmer: bzr-git creates dud xml, bzr-svn depends on python 2.5
[20:49] <jelmer> mwhudson: ah, no I didn't see anything
[20:49] <jelmer> where did you send?
[20:50] <mwhudson> jelmer: #bzr
[20:50] <mwhudson> jelmer: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/139834/
[20:52] <jelmer> mwhudson: current bzr-svn should work with python2.4
[20:52] <jelmer> mwhudson: somebody contributed a patch
[20:53] <jelmer> mwhudson: I was going to say bzr-git/dulwich are a fair bit faster now, and no longer have memory issues
[20:55] <jelmer> mwhudson: this is actually a bug in bzr
[20:55] <jelmer> mwhudson: bzr-svn has a workaround for it, I'll add it to bzr-git as well
[20:56] <jelmer> (some characters can't be represented in XML, and so we have to strip them out)
[20:56] <mwhudson> jelmer: right, i assumed it was a bug in bzr that you could even create this revision "xml"
[21:01] <jelmer> mwhudson: yeah
[21:02] <mwhudson> jelmer: oh right, and does "fetch_spec" ring any bells for you wrt bzr-svn compatibility fun?
[21:02] <mwhudson> i was hacking on the plane and getting errors
[21:03] <jelmer> mwhudson: That should also already be fixed
[21:03] <jelmer> what version of bzr-svn are you using?
[21:04] <mwhudson> dunno, trunk of a week or two ago
[21:06] <jelmer> mwhudson: s/trunk/0.5 ? :-)
[21:06] <mwhudson> jelmer: s/trunk/lp:bzr-svn/
[21:08] <jelmer> mwhudson: ah :-) But yeah, I've added support for fetch_spec recently (not sure if it was less than two weeks ago though, probably a bit more)
[21:08] <mwhudson> jelmer: ok
[21:12] <wgrant> flixr: I wonder if the account merge process didn't move the OpenPGP key across - asking at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion is probably a good idea.
[21:15] <flixr> wgrant, ok I'll do that
[21:20] <jelmer> mwhudson: also, bzr-git/dulwich are now significantly faster
[21:20] <mwhudson> jelmer: ok
[21:20] <mwhudson> jelmer: sounds like it's time to upgrade our dependencies
[21:22] <jelmer> mwhudson: dulwich now includes two (optional) C files
[21:23] <mwhudson> jelmer: ok
[21:38] <jelmer> mwhudson: can you remove the existing ~jelmer/git/trunk branch?
[21:39] <jelmer> I've just created a new one with the bug workaround
[21:39] <mwhudson> jelmer: i can, but so can you surely? :)
[21:41] <mwhudson> jelmer: it's gone
[21:44] <jelmer> mwhudson: thanks
[21:44] <jelmer> not sure why I thought I couldn't do that
[21:46] <flixr> I was wondering if someone could delete the user paparazzi, since it is a dead account with no information and no activity since begging of 2008?
[21:55] <spm> flixr: I can... but why?
[21:56] <flixr> I want to register a team for the project called paparazzi and would have liked to name the team paparazzi as well
[21:57] <flixr> actually I just registerd the team under paparazzi-team
[21:57] <wgrant> 2008 wasn't long ago...
[21:57] <flixr> jep, ok
[21:58] <spm> flixr: in these cases; we'd ask that you send a request to the person in question if they mind losing the name; we can rename them or similar. ditto your team.
[21:58] <spm> If they don't respond within a week or two... well that tends to imply a certain amount of interest-lack.
[21:59] <flixr> ok, I'll do that
[21:59] <spm> cool. just raise an 'Answer/Q' when you get thee ok, or nothing and we'll take from there.
[22:01] <flixr> jep, thx