=== scream is now known as JonCharge | ||
JonCharge | Can any one here set importance? | 00:09 |
---|---|---|
JonCharge | Ampelbein, ping | 00:14 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: | 00:14 |
JonCharge | https://bugs.launchpad.net/apt/+bug/351076 | 00:14 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 351076 in xserver-xorg-input-aiptek "Package xserver-xorg-input-aiptek does not install (Januty beta)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 00:14 |
JonCharge | Suggest medium | 00:15 |
JonCharge | And the bug I think has enough information for a dev to start working on it. | 00:15 |
Ampelbein | looking | 00:15 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: why medium? i would set it to low, it's an unsual hardware. | 00:18 |
JonCharge | It meets two of the criteria for medium I think. | 00:19 |
JonCharge | A bug that has a severe impact on a non-core application. | 00:19 |
JonCharge | A problem with a non-essential hardware component (network card, camera, webcam, music player, sound card, power management feature, printer, etc.) | 00:19 |
JonCharge | But I defer to your judgement. | 00:19 |
JonCharge | You are more experienced. :) | 00:19 |
JonCharge | When I looked at * Bugs/Importance | 00:20 |
JonCharge | I'll go with low if that is what you want to do. | 00:21 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: you could also argument that it meets two criteria for low: uncommon hardware and usability issue. | 00:21 |
JonCharge | Ah... | 00:21 |
JonCharge | Your right. | 00:21 |
Ampelbein | i think we should not discuss to deeply about importance. | 00:21 |
JonCharge | Ok | 00:21 |
JonCharge | I'm new at this. | 00:22 |
JonCharge | :) | 00:22 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: no problem, thanks for helping ;-) | 00:22 |
JonCharge | Anytime. | 00:22 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: another thing: launchpad uses tags to identify some issues. there is a tag "packaging" which would apply here. | 00:22 |
Ampelbein | see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags | 00:23 |
JonCharge | tagged, and I'll read that doc | 00:24 |
Ampelbein | and if you use pgp/mime we won't see your pgp-signature on the comments ;-) (just cosmetical) | 00:24 |
JonCharge | I'll do that. Do you know how to keep the commands out of the comments? | 00:24 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: don't know. but they don't cause harm. | 00:29 |
JonCharge | ok | 00:29 |
Ampelbein | i've set it to triaged/medium, following your suggestion. | 00:30 |
JonCharge | ok | 00:30 |
Ampelbein | thanks for your work. | 00:30 |
JonCharge | No problem :) | 00:30 |
JonCharge | I have applied to the bug control team, should hear back shortly I think. | 00:32 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: have you already sent a mail with your application? | 00:40 |
JonCharge | Ampelbein, yes, I have... | 00:45 |
Ampelbein | JonCharge: found it already, commenting a bit. | 00:46 |
JonCharge | oh ok, I was about to link it | 00:46 |
=== scream is now known as JonCharge | ||
Ampelbein | JonCharge: wrote a reply, sadly i can't give a +1 yet. please read my comments and the documentation provided again. | 01:04 |
JonCharge | I will, and thank you for the feedback. | 01:05 |
=== ApOgEE__ is now known as ApOgEE-- | ||
torkiano | hello all, can someone help me triaging bug #344705 | 04:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 344705 in openjdk-6 "IcedTea Plugin Doesnt Work" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/344705 | 04:59 |
torkiano | Is needed more info? | 04:59 |
dholbach | good morning | 06:14 |
YoBoY | hi | 06:38 |
thekorn | good morning bugsquad | 07:35 |
dominiks | morning bugsquad | 08:50 |
dominiks | bug 98626 was closed in Debian 3 days ago.. how long does it take for LP to reflect status changes of bugs in remote watch please? | 08:52 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 98626 in checkstyle "please add command line program" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/98626 | 08:52 |
xhochy | Could I please get a wishlist importance for bug 351427 ? | 08:52 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 351427 in gnome-control-center "Add "use max resolution checkbox+functionality" to gnome-display-properties" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/351427 | 08:52 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
liw | could someone mark #349653 as "triaged"? (I'm the developer of the package, it has all the info I need, but I don't have the LP priviledges to change to triaged, just confirmed) | 13:20 |
pedro_ | liw: done | 13:25 |
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
Hobbsee | liw: why don't you have the developer privs? | 14:00 |
liw | Hobbsee, because I suck, mainly | 14:00 |
liw | (by being lazy) | 14:00 |
Hobbsee | ah | 14:00 |
Hobbsee | it probably only takes a mail saying "please add me to the team", based on who you are, though | 14:00 |
BUGabundo | asac: around? | 14:17 |
BUGabundo | I did ran that comand line you gave me to see why wifi would not connect with low signal | 14:18 |
BUGabundo | nothing to special there.... | 14:18 |
BUGabundo | it didn't hopped channel | 14:18 |
=== bromic94 is now known as thewrath | ||
bddebian | Boo | 15:17 |
thekorn | hello bddebian | 15:18 |
Hobbsee | argh! you scared me, bddebian! ;) | 15:19 |
bddebian | Hi the | 15:19 |
bddebian | Err thekorn | 15:19 |
bddebian | Heya Hobbsee! | 15:19 |
BUGabundo | foo | 15:20 |
dominiks | bug 98626 was closed in Debian 3 days ago.. how long does it take for LP to reflect status changes of bugs in remote watch please? | 15:30 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 98626 in checkstyle "please add command line program" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/98626 | 15:30 |
hggdh | dominiks, should be at most one day | 15:53 |
yofel | could somebody with the rights mark bug 351389 as wishlist please | 16:01 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 351389 in ubuntu-restricted-extras "64bit restricted extras should use 64bit flash and java plugins" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/351389 | 16:01 |
BUGabundo | yofel: they better! | 16:04 |
BUGabundo | its going to take a while on both counts | 16:04 |
BUGabundo | adobe flash install package is no where to be fund | 16:04 |
BUGabundo | *found | 16:04 |
BUGabundo | and even if we have java 64 bits | 16:05 |
BUGabundo | there is not applet | 16:05 |
dominiks | hggdh: thanks for info.. i'll just wait bit more then :) | 16:05 |
hggdh | yofel, we cannot sanely provide an alpha version of flash as the official distribution | 16:06 |
yofel | ok | 16:06 |
* hggdh also wishes for the 64-bit flash... | 16:07 | |
BUGabundo | hggdh: I use 64bits no prob there | 16:08 |
BUGabundo | just don't have source :( | 16:08 |
BUGabundo | java on the other hand is trieker | 16:08 |
BUGabundo | but that's over my head.... no idea what lacks to make the applet | 16:08 |
hggdh | BUGabundo, the issue is not if it seems to work, but the fact it is *alpha*: guaranteed to be unstable... | 16:13 |
BUGabundo | hggdh: hasn't give me any trouble | 16:14 |
BUGabundo | other then some PA issues | 16:14 |
BUGabundo | but latest PA works fine | 16:14 |
BUGabundo | as you can see on my webcam stream | 16:14 |
hggdh | I do not doubt it; I just do not see a reason to add an alpha version of a package in an official distribution. Of course, nothing against having it in a PPA, for example | 16:15 |
BUGabundo | that's the 2nd prob | 16:16 |
BUGabundo | gnomefreak already tried ti | 16:16 |
BUGabundo | but there is no secure sourse of the package | 16:16 |
gnomefreak | huh? | 16:16 |
BUGabundo | no md5, nothing | 16:16 |
BUGabundo | hey gnomefreak | 16:16 |
gnomefreak | hi BUGabundo | 16:17 |
BUGabundo | just talking about flash 64bits packaign | 16:17 |
BUGabundo | someone oned yet another wish bug to packaged it | 16:17 |
gnomefreak | let one of the motu guys worry about that there is alot of changes to files/scripts | 16:17 |
gnomefreak | that are needed | 16:17 |
=== jtisme is now known as jtisi | ||
=== jtisi is now known as jtisme | ||
=== nanomad_ is now known as nanomad | ||
bond` | who maintains flashplugin-nonfree? | 18:05 |
jpds | I think it's being replaced by adobe-flashplugin in the partner repo. | 18:05 |
BUGabundo | gym time ppl! see you tomorrow | 18:06 |
bond` | jpds: so flashplugin-nonfree should not be used anymore? | 18:12 |
=== erhesrhsrtb54vyh is now known as Elbrus | ||
=== jgoguen_ is now known as jgoguen | ||
kees | bdmurray: is there a bzr tree anywhere for scripts for doing common bug repsonses? | 18:49 |
bdmurray | kees: via launchpadlib? | 18:49 |
kees | right | 18:49 |
bdmurray | no, I think that would fit well in ubuntu-qa-tools though | 18:49 |
bdmurray | I've a couple I've been meaning to add | 18:50 |
kees | what's the url for that? | 18:50 |
sbeattie | mutt-scripts/b-tool should be easy to extend in that direction. | 18:50 |
kees | the security team wants to push our scripts out into the public | 18:50 |
bdmurray | lp:ubuntu-qa-tools ;-) | 18:50 |
=== ejat is now known as e-jat | ||
=== ivoks_ is now known as ivoks | ||
kees | bdmurray: okay, I just shoved a mess of stuff in there. I'll probably move lpl_common.py to ubuntu-dev-tools when karmic opens | 19:21 |
jpds | kees: You can do so now if you like, I don't plan to make any more u-d-t uploads till karmic. | 19:30 |
kees | jpds: okay | 19:31 |
greg_ | Can anyone confirm that, while using the 9.04 beta, a "side by side" install might take a while, without any notification, before progressing to the "who are you? page? | 19:40 |
=== fader_ is now known as fader|late_lunch | ||
Ryan52 | kees: heh. should I just ask you directly instead of filing bugs next time? :P | 20:23 |
* Ryan52 notes that ryanakca's changes didn't even work.. | 20:23 | |
kees | Ryan52: well, file bugs, but ping me, yeah. I've reworked the whole thing now, so one can use --distro=debian and it should work. | 20:52 |
kees | Ryan52: mostly I didn't like the multiple tests for "if debian". it needed to be much more generalized | 20:53 |
kees | however, having a patch to work from helps greatly to see which pieces needed to be abstracted. | 20:53 |
Ryan52 | ok, thanks. | 20:56 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== fader|late_lunch is now known as fader_ | ||
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
donspaulding | python's virtualenv utility is broken with python2.6 on jaunty. The only bug I can find for this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339904 which doesn't have any solution in sight. A similar issue (though I'm not sure it is an identical problem) is reported as fixed upstream at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518826 . How can I verify if the upstream package fixes the virtualenv issue? | 21:19 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 339904 in python-virtualenv "python-virtualenv doesn't work with Python 2.6.x" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:19 |
donspaulding | i.e. I'm willing to go out and install the debian package, if that won't totally hose my system. | 21:22 |
maxb | hosing potential is sufficiently high that I wouldn't try that on *my* system | 23:19 |
=== ccooke_ is now known as ccooke | ||
maxb | donspaulding: What does virtualenv do and how might I test it, anyway? | 23:27 |
Bodsda | Hi, im having problems using gdb, the wiki says to use ctrl+c after continue to go to the next step of debugging an already running application, but ctrl+c stops gdb completely | 23:27 |
Bodsda | O1;2P | 23:28 |
Bodsda | oops | 23:28 |
maxb | Bodsda: Which wiki page do you refer to? | 23:29 |
Bodsda | maxb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace#Already%20running%20programs | 23:29 |
maxb | Bodsda: I think you are misreading the wiki. It says to use Ctrl-C to break into the (gdb) prompt | 23:33 |
Bodsda | maxb: im not sure what you mean, step 5: The program will continue running. Perform any actions necessary to reproduce the crash. If the program hangs but doesn't crash you can press ctrl+c in gdb while the program is frozen and then continue with the next step. -- i read that as meaning press ctrl+c to get back to the (gdb) prompt | 23:35 |
Ampelbein | Bodsda: only if the program freezes | 23:37 |
Ampelbein | Bodsda: if it crashes you are back at the gdb-prompt | 23:37 |
Bodsda | Ampelbein: the program is already frozen -- the section of the wiki im quoting is headed "Already running programs" | 23:38 |
Bodsda | the program is gnome-panel, and it is frozen upon login | 23:38 |
Ampelbein | Bodsda: can you give a screenshot explaining? you attach via gdb --pid <pidofgnome-panel> ? | 23:39 |
Bodsda | Ampelbein: I attach by doing exactly as it says in step three of the already running programs section https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace#Already%20running%20programs A screenshot wont help, the panels appear normal, but are completely non-responsive | 23:41 |
Ampelbein | a screenshot of the gdb-prompt | 23:41 |
Bodsda | Ampelbein: what are you hoping to see? | 23:42 |
Ampelbein | Bodsda: where you want to type ctrl-c. | 23:42 |
Ampelbein | ctrl-c only makes sense after continuing | 23:43 |
Ampelbein | otherwise you can just do the backtrace | 23:43 |
seb128 | Bodsda: just run gdb --pid $(pidof gnome-panel) | 23:43 |
seb128 | and they you can "bt" | 23:43 |
Bodsda | sorry, im trying something someone suggested in #ubntu+1, il be back in a sec | 23:44 |
Bodsda | got it to work | 23:47 |
Bodsda | followed these instructions: < syockit> Bodsda: (1) run gdb without any parameters, i.e. just gdb (2) follow the steps until before attach (3) do the following: set logging file gdb-<program>.txt (4) do: set logging on (5) attach the process (6) do: c to continue (7) ctrl-c to return to gdb (8) q to quit at any time | 23:47 |
Bodsda | thanks guys | 23:47 |
Bodsda | hey Rocket2DMn | 23:47 |
donspaulding | maxb: sorry, wasn't watching this window | 23:47 |
maxb | donspaulding: Looks to me like the package may be completely broken by the Python changes in Jaunty... | 23:47 |
donspaulding | you can sudo a-g install virtualenv | 23:48 |
donspaulding | err, python-virtualenv, that is | 23:48 |
donspaulding | maxb: yes, that's what it looks like | 23:48 |
donspaulding | maxb: virtualenv let's you isolate working environments when developing python applications. | 23:48 |
donspaulding | e.g. you can install two different versions of django on the same machine and each environment keeps track of which library it has installed. | 23:49 |
maxb | The package builds fine if you add an --install-layout=deb to the setup.py install command, but it still doesn't work. I think it's going to require source changes to accomodate the changed python default layout | 23:50 |
donspaulding | maxb: it's an incredibly useful tool, and it'll be the first thing hundreds of python devs try to use as soon as jaunty is released, so I think it ought to get fixed before jaunty rolls out, if at all possible. | 23:51 |
donspaulding | what caused the shift from site-packages to dist-packages? | 23:51 |
JanC | avoiding problems with some upstream python libraries when you install them manually, I think | 23:55 |
JanC | donspaulding: so partially the same reason why you use virtualenv I suppose... ;-) | 23:57 |
donspaulding | JanC: yeah, virtualenv will one day rule the python packaging world, it's just not there yet ;-) | 23:57 |
JanC | well, it's mainly useful if you want to "container" a specific python + libraries for one application, right? | 23:59 |
JanC | OTOH I think that what Debian/Ubuntu want is that their system-wide install keeps working | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!