| TheMuso | .c | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| directhex | .cs | 00:06 |
| === jdong_ is now known as j-dizzle | ||
| === j-dizzle is now known as jdong | ||
| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
| xoox | Can anyone tell me why the ppa repo https://launchpad.net/~rvm4000/+archive/ppa is empty? All the links are broken. | 02:10 |
| === spork is now known as Guest64965 | ||
| Milyardo | xoox: https://launchpad.net/~rvm4000/+archive/ppa/+build/917148 | 02:35 |
| Milyardo | There were build failures at launchpads last attempt to build packages | 02:35 |
| === Andre_Gondim is now known as Andre_Gondim-afk | ||
| xoox | Milyardo: So *no* packages are available? | 03:03 |
| xoox | Milyardo: Seems only lpia failed. | 03:03 |
| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
| === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso | ||
| === Andre_Gondim-afk is now known as Andre_Gondim | ||
| === Andre_Gondim is now known as Andre_Gondim-afk | ||
| LordKow | so whats going on with nautilus-actions? | 05:51 |
| LordKow | bug 341035 | 05:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 341035 in nautilus-actions "[jaunty] %d parameter returns nothing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/341035 | 05:51 |
| LordKow | upstream cvs has had little activity over the last couple of years, mostly translation updates. all of the bug reports on gnome's bugtracker are being left alone. i don't think ubuntu should try and maintain an otherwise unmaintained package... if that is the case. | 05:52 |
| LordKow | it appears that nautilus scripts can pretty much do the same. and as it stands right now nautilus-actions is pretty much useless if %params are broken. | 05:52 |
| LordKow | i guess not all the %params are broken, but still my other points stick... i guess if there is a motu person who wants to continue to maintain it then sure. | 05:55 |
| dholbach | good morning | 06:26 |
| stefanlsd | morning | 06:28 |
| dholbach | hiya stefanlsd | 06:28 |
| === fabrice_sp__ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
| fabrice_sp | 'morning stefanlsd | 06:34 |
| pwnguin | ScottK-desktop: out of curiousity, how'd you notice #312957 | 06:37 |
| dholbach | can I persuade somebody to do a demo of some packaging topic on 23rd April, 0:00 UTC? | 07:07 |
| dholbach | I know I might be up at the wrong time to persuade people who are awake around that time ;-) | 07:07 |
| dtchen | i could. any suggested topics/boundaries? | 07:13 |
| dholbach | hey dtchen | 07:14 |
| * dholbach hugs dtchen | 07:14 | |
| dholbach | anything you like - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Packaging/Training is what we're going to try out | 07:14 |
| dholbach | a 15 minute demo + some time for Q&A is compeltely fine | 07:14 |
| dholbach | I hope that people will step up and give short demos like "dh_install --list-missing" or "quilt" or "pbuilder hooks" or whatever | 07:15 |
| maco | yes plz! | 07:15 |
| maco | doh...i'll have to miss that one. there'll be logs, right? | 07:17 |
| dtchen | maybe piuparts, though i certainly don't mind covering dh 7/quilt/git | 07:17 |
| dholbach | sure | 07:17 |
| dtchen | let me get back to you via e-mail | 07:17 |
| dholbach | dtchen: thanks a lot - I'll be announcing the sessions in a bit anyway, we'll just keep the slot open until then | 07:18 |
| dholbach | dtchen: as I said, whatever you like - I'm sure there's going to be a lot of people who appreciate it | 07:18 |
| geser | good morning | 08:21 |
| dholbach | hi geser | 08:22 |
| geser | Hi dholbach | 08:22 |
| stefanlsd | Anyone willing to take a look at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tripod/+bug/337862 - its NBS and there is a FTBFS for lastfm. Its qt4.5 related and gentoo has a patch, i just cant work the qmake stuff out | 08:25 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 337862 in amarok "Small libgpod3 -> libgpod4 transition" [High,Fix released] | 08:25 |
| === santiago-pgsql is now known as santiago-ve | ||
| Toadstool | good morning | 08:30 |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| abli | Hi! if I want to publish a package in my ppa for hardy, intrepid and jaunty, does that mean that I have to uploaded it three times with only the distrib being different in the changelog? | 11:53 |
| geser | abli: yes, changing the distro and the version (e.g. adding ~intrepid1 to the end) | 11:55 |
| abli | Even if nothing else is different? Shouldn't I be able to upload a single source package and say "compile this for each distrib"? | 11:56 |
| pmjdebruijn | not yet | 11:56 |
| abli | ok. thanks. | 11:57 |
| geser | abli: as the build debs are strored in one directory you can't have three different debs (each one for a different release) in that one dir (as the filename will be the same) | 11:58 |
| abli | ok. Uploading the source three times is no problem. I was just trying to avoid generating extra work for the ppa system, but I guess its not much of an issue. | 11:59 |
| pmjdebruijn | just always suffix ~intrepid or ~jaunty | 12:00 |
| gordonsyme | Hello | 12:01 |
| gordonsyme | Any python packagers about? | 12:01 |
| === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| ScottK | pwnguin: One of the Python teams (pythonistas) is subscribed to cwiid bugs. | 13:27 |
| directhex | wii! | 13:29 |
| directhex | i still wish someone more competent than me had done something with the ps3 bluetooth remote | 13:29 |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| goshawk | hi | 14:11 |
| gordonsyme | Hi, any python packagers around? | 14:17 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: as in python apps or python itself | 14:17 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: python apps | 14:18 |
| cody-somerville | !ask | 14:18 |
| ubottu | Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line, so others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) | 14:18 |
| hyperair | well i've been messing around with a python app but nobody's reviewed it/sponsored it in debian | 14:18 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: I've been trying to work out how to package something for a few days and I've just hit a wall. I don't know enough about the packaging process to continue | 14:18 |
| hyperair | yea just ask | 14:18 |
| POX | hyperair: not possible, did you ask on #debian-python or debian-python@l.d.o ? | 14:19 |
| hyperair | POX: what? | 14:19 |
| POX | "but nobody's reviewed it/sponsored it in debian" | 14:20 |
| hyperair | POX: i'm not satisfied yet | 14:20 |
| hyperair | POX: when i'm satisfied with my own packaging i'll ask for sponsoring | 14:20 |
| hyperair | POX: there's a java part which may or may not need building | 14:20 |
| gordonsyme | I have a bunch of modules and three scripts. I have distutils building a tarball for me. Previously I was using CDBS to package the distutils tarball into a single deb. Now I would like to package the modules in one 'common' deb and put each script into its own deb. Is this even possible without writing a massive rules file? | 14:20 |
| POX | oh ok, I thought nodoby in Debian replied to your RFS | 14:21 |
| hyperair | POX: hahah | 14:21 |
| hyperair | POX: actually i think i posted an RFS on debian-mentors | 14:21 |
| hyperair | POX: then i retracted it because upstream changed something | 14:22 |
| POX | Cc debian-python@ next time | 14:22 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: look into dh_install | 14:22 |
| hyperair | POX: does debian-python have some sort of Vcs? | 14:22 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: thanks | 14:23 |
| POX | debian-python@l.d.o is a mailing list, but we have 2 teams as well | 14:23 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: you might be interested in looking at remuco-server which is sitting in mentors.debian.net | 14:23 |
| POX | one for modules/extensions and one for applications | 14:23 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: cool, will have a look | 14:23 |
| POX | can someone teach the ubottu about DPMT and PAPT? | 14:23 |
| hyperair | POX: i see. what are their names? | 14:23 |
| hyperair | POX: what's DPMT and PAPT? | 14:24 |
| POX | there's a wiki page on ubuntu.com, IIRC | 14:24 |
| POX | let me search | 14:24 |
| POX | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/PythonModulesTeam | 14:26 |
| hyperair | POX: i see. cool | 14:28 |
| hyperair | POX: only svn? =( | 14:29 |
| POX | but your package will have to be perfect to be sponsored, ask savvas ;) | 14:29 |
| hyperair | ? | 14:29 |
| POX | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imgseek/+bug/342450 | 14:30 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 342450 in imgseek "Please sync imgseek 0.8.6-3 from debian unstable" [Medium,Confirmed] | 14:30 |
| POX | "It was a long journey" ;) | 14:30 |
| hyperair | ._.? | 14:30 |
| * hyperair doesn't like svn =\ | 14:32 | |
| POX | it's just a tool that keeps the debian dir | 14:32 |
| hyperair | yes iknow | 14:33 |
| hyperair | i prefer git | 14:33 |
| POX | tell that to >100 other maintainers | 14:33 |
| hyperair | =( | 14:33 |
| POX | I like git too, but I doubt we'll use it | 14:34 |
| hyperair | we could use both =D | 14:34 |
| POX | even if I would be the only one to decide | 14:34 |
| hyperair | oh =( | 14:34 |
| hyperair | well pkg-cli-* has both git and svn | 14:34 |
| POX | no we cannot use both | 14:34 |
| hyperair | why not | 14:34 |
| POX | one of the requirement is to have a command that will update all packages (including the new ones) | 14:35 |
| hyperair | oh | 14:35 |
| POX | try to check/sponsor few packages a day when you cannnot automate as much a possible | 14:36 |
| hyperair | since when is sponsoring an automated task | 14:36 |
| POX | updating all packages in one comman and grepping for common mistake is | 14:37 |
| POX | or updating it while starting to read RFS mails | 14:37 |
| POX | command* | 14:37 |
| hyperair | i see | 14:38 |
| POX | actually right now I'm without computer at home (it died few days ago), but usually I do it this way | 14:38 |
| ahasenack | hey guys, got this error when trying to build a package for smart-1.2 (based on the previous jaunty one): | 14:40 |
| ahasenack | pycentral: pycentral debhelper: both directories site-packages and dist-packages exist. | 14:40 |
| ahasenack | pycentral debhelper: both directories site-packages and dist-packages exist. | 14:40 |
| ahasenack | it's the same rules file (1.1.1 vs 1.2), and same environment (jaunty), but for some reason it fails when using 1.2 | 14:40 |
| ahasenack | what's this about? | 14:40 |
| * hyperair has only used python-support | 14:42 | |
| hyperair | but if rules fails with 1.2, then obviously upstream has changed something | 14:42 |
| hyperair | and rules needs to be updated | 14:42 |
| hyperair | or something else | 14:42 |
| POX | hyperair: it will be hard to be sponsored with python-central in our teams | 14:43 |
| POX | ahasenack: check if you have new pytohn-central | 14:43 |
| hyperair | POX: ? | 14:43 |
| POX | python2.6 installs to dist-utils by default (or at least if the layout=deb is used) | 14:43 |
| ahasenack | POX: 0.6.11ubuntu5 | 14:43 |
| hyperair | POX: you mean python-support or python-central is preferred? | 14:43 |
| POX | so it's ok | 14:43 |
| POX | not prefered, pysupport is the only one accepted since few week | 14:44 |
| POX | s | 14:44 |
| ahasenack | hmm, found a difference in setup.py | 14:44 |
| hyperair | POX: then you shouldn't be telling me, i've only ever used python-support ;) | 14:44 |
| hyperair | POX: but you should get the debian python policy page updated | 14:44 |
| POX | I only wanted to let you know that you're using the right one ;) | 14:44 |
| hyperair | POX: ah okay =p | 14:44 |
| POX | hyperair: the policy for 95% of packages is 1) install to standard location 2) call dh_pysupport | 14:45 |
| hyperair | POX: install to standard location meaning? | 14:46 |
| POX | we'll deal with policy once all packages will not use pycentral or "currect" | 14:46 |
| hyperair | my package uses python setup.py install --install-lib=/usr/share/python-support/modulename --root=debian/tmp | 14:46 |
| POX | hyperair: python ./setup.py --root=debian/package/ | 14:46 |
| hyperair | POX: is that all that's needed? | 14:46 |
| POX | hyperair: that's wrong | 14:46 |
| POX | you should not use pysupport internal paths | 14:47 |
| hyperair | hm | 14:47 |
| POX | remove --install-lib and it will be ok | 14:47 |
| hyperair | POX: the policy said to use --isntall-lib. don't you think this is even more reason to correct it? | 14:48 |
| hyperair | and perhaps state that "pysupport is preferred" | 14:48 |
| POX | hyperair: there are lots of special cases, but again for ~90% of packages that's all what you need to know about python policy | 14:48 |
| POX | at least for python modules | 14:49 |
| hyperair | POX: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ap-packaging_tools.html#s-pysupport | 14:49 |
| POX | (not applications or extensions) | 14:49 |
| hyperair | POX: i'm talking about this. it says use --install-lib | 14:49 |
| POX | check README file from python-support package | 14:49 |
| POX | (the one from experimental has a mini howto) | 14:50 |
| hyperair | hmm | 14:50 |
| POX | /usr/share/doc/python-support/README.gz | 14:50 |
| POX | (experimental's one is updated) | 14:50 |
| hyperair | i see | 14:51 |
| POX | (will be uploaded to unstable soon) | 14:51 |
| hyperair | but seriously, what's wrong with updating the policy? | 14:51 |
| POX | you have to convince doko to update it | 14:52 |
| POX | and since he's python-central author, it will be hard | 14:52 |
| hyperair | ugh | 14:52 |
| goshawk | i'm packaging a compiler which needs a library which is not packaged in ubuntu yet (both library and compiler). The compiler needs the library (which is a .a) to link binaries cuz it's a standard library. Should i package the library into the compiler package or should i create 2 packages, oner for library-dev and one for compiler? | 14:54 |
| hyperair | POX: without --install-lib, it installs into /usr/share/python2.6 | 14:54 |
| hyperair | sorry | 14:54 |
| hyperair | debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages | 14:54 |
| POX | that's ok, dh_pysupport will move the files to the right location | 14:54 |
| sistpoty|work | goshawk: I'd just put it the static lib into the compiler package | 14:55 |
| hyperair | POX: but it didn't | 14:55 |
| POX | change "tmp" to package name and it will | 14:55 |
| hyperair | meh. | 14:55 |
| hyperair | i see | 14:55 |
| goshawk | sistpoty|work: uhm... well. | 14:55 |
| hyperair | so pysupport is after dh_install eh | 14:55 |
| POX | yes | 14:56 |
| goshawk | sistpoty|work: do you know if there is a paragraph in the debian policy about it? | 14:56 |
| hyperair | i see | 14:56 |
| sistpoty|work | goshawk: to my knowledge there isn't | 14:57 |
| sistpoty|work | goshawk: does upstream release the library as separate tarball? | 14:57 |
| goshawk | sistpoty|work: yes | 14:57 |
| goshawk | compiler is a project | 14:57 |
| sistpoty|work | goshawk: then I guess the -dev is better... just thought this was in the same tarball | 14:57 |
| goshawk | and library another one | 14:58 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: many thanks for your help, your remuco-server rules file showed me exactly what to do | 14:58 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: np. | 14:58 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: one thing. debian/rules should not have --install-lib in the setup.py call | 14:58 |
| goshawk | sistpoty|work: but the compiler should depend on the library then | 14:58 |
| goshawk | as Depends: | 14:58 |
| sistpoty|work | goshawk: if it otherwise can't build binaries then yes | 14:58 |
| goshawk | isn't it? | 14:59 |
| goshawk | ok | 14:59 |
| goshawk | thx | 14:59 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: also, if you don't have a Makefile as well as a setup.py at the top-level, you shouldn't need to override dh_auto_install | 14:59 |
| goshawk | one more think | 14:59 |
| goshawk | thing | 14:59 |
| goshawk | the library name is tango | 14:59 |
| goshawk | should i package it as libtango? | 14:59 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: ok, I'll give that a go. Thanks again | 15:00 |
| hyperair | goshawk: see the debian library packaging guide | 15:00 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: if you're using git, you can use git clone git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/remuco-server.git | 15:00 |
| hyperair | gordonsyme: i've updated the stuff there | 15:01 |
| gordonsyme | hyperair: great, ta | 15:01 |
| hyperair | =) | 15:01 |
| vladimir_e | hi all, does anyone know why claws-mail-tools depends on claws-mail? it's a recommended package for Sylpheed and that forces Sylpheed users to install claws-mail | 15:08 |
| bddebian | Heya gang | 15:12 |
| sistpoty|work | hi bddebian | 15:15 |
| bddebian | Heya sistpoty|work | 15:15 |
| cody-somerville | vladimir_e, Probably a bug. | 15:16 |
| cody-somerville | vladimir_e, please file one :) | 15:16 |
| vladimir_e | cody-somerville, yes, wanted some insight before doing so | 15:16 |
| \sh | et voila...google-perftools fixed | 15:29 |
| ziroday | could anyone help me out with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/GettingStarted? | 15:33 |
| ziroday | I'm getting a 500 error | 15:33 |
| vladimir_e | ziroday, working for me | 15:33 |
| ziroday | vladimir_e: heh, appending the ? made it work, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/GettingStarted doesn't though | 15:34 |
| maxb | ziroday: It works for me, try refresh (or Shift+Refresh) | 15:45 |
| ziroday | maxb: must just be my day :) | 15:45 |
| === rTd_fNjL is now known as LjL | ||
| LucidFox | If I see a bug with only a patch attached rather than a debdiff, should I ask the patch's author to post a debdiff, or make my own upload and include the patch there? | 17:50 |
| maco | make your own | 17:50 |
| maco | not everyone that knows how to code knows how to make a debdiff. ive started going through and converting patches i find | 17:51 |
| === santiago-pgsql is now known as santiago-ve | ||
| * LucidFox nods | 17:52 | |
| === mathiaz_ is now known as mathiaz | ||
| === Igorot is now known as Knightlust | ||
| YokoZar | Quick sponsorship question: if I'm sponsoring someone else's debdiff without further changes, I'm supposed to leave their name in the changelog and manually sign it before uploading yes? | 18:46 |
| directhex | afaik yes | 18:47 |
| YokoZar | (this isn't listed in the sponsorship workflow page): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue | 18:47 |
| directhex | i.e. acknowledgement of who did the work | 18:47 |
| directhex | i've been in a few changelog.Debian.gz files anyway | 18:48 |
| YokoZar | How does launchpad know whose signature is on it? | 18:48 |
| YokoZar | (eg that I uploaded it) | 18:48 |
| YokoZar | because it tracks that too I think | 18:48 |
| YokoZar | Also I'm not entirely sure of the command to make this manual signature (I'll put it in the wiki on the sponsorship page) | 18:49 |
| fabrice_sp | Hi. A small question: can a package in universe depends on packages in multiverse? | 18:50 |
| directhex | debuild takes a -k flag | 18:50 |
| directhex | fabrice_sp, no, that package is a multiverse package by definition | 18:50 |
| YokoZar | fabrice_sp: no, that package should then be moved to multiverse | 18:50 |
| YokoZar | Although that has to be done manually I think | 18:50 |
| YokoZar | fabrice_sp: It can recommend them though | 18:51 |
| directhex | YokoZar, recommends is okay? i thought only suggests | 18:52 |
| fabrice_sp | directhex, so what kind of bug report should I open to demote it? (it's for mythtv-status, that depends on libmyth-perl) | 18:52 |
| fabrice_sp | or YokoZar | 18:53 |
| YokoZar | directhex: I thought recommends was okay...that way when someone has multiverse unchecked in sources it won't freak out like it will with depends | 18:53 |
| YokoZar | Only difference between recommends and suggests is install by default -- otherwise we'd need a third category (install by default unless repo is disabled) or something, which is what recommends does currently | 18:54 |
| Turl | hi | 18:54 |
| Turl | how can I call dh_desktop on cdbs? | 18:55 |
| YokoZar | fabrice_sp: file a bug against the package on launchpad and just put that in the description "should be in multiverse" or "depends on a multiverse package but is in universe" | 18:55 |
| fabrice_sp | YokoZar, ok. Thanks! | 18:55 |
| fabrice_sp | For that request (move from universe to multiverse), should I subscribe u-u-s or archive admin directly? | 19:04 |
| AnAnt | Hello, I am trying to create a pbuilder environment from the Jaunty beta ISO image as follows: | 19:23 |
| AnAnt | sudo pbuilder --create --distribution jaunty --mirror "deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 9.04 _Jaunty Jackalope_ - Beta i386 (20090324)]/" | 19:23 |
| AnAnt | and I've mounted the ISO on /cdrom/ | 19:23 |
| AnAnt | yet pbuilder gives this error: | 19:24 |
| === Zic is now known as Guest12602 | ||
| AnAnt | E: unknown location deb/dists/jaunty/Release | 19:24 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: run the command without "deb" and see what happens. | 19:24 |
| AnAnt | E: unknown location cdrom:[Ubuntu/dists/jaunty/Release | 19:25 |
| AnAnt | so ? | 19:25 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: did you use apt-cdrom to add the CD? | 19:27 |
| AnAnt | lfaraone: apt-cdrom in what ? | 19:27 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: apt-cdrom is a utility. | 19:27 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: you use it to add CDs to your apt sources. | 19:28 |
| AnAnt | lfaraone: I'm talking about pbuilder, apt-cdrom adds CD in /etc/apt/sources.list | 19:28 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: once you do that, apt should know to use it automagically. | 19:28 |
| AnAnt | lfaraone: what has apt to do with pbuilder ? | 19:28 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: (pbuilder uses apt) | 19:28 |
| lfaraone | AnAnt: *everything* | 19:28 |
| AnAnt | lfaraone: anyways, the CD got added when I ran /cdrom/cdromupgrade | 19:29 |
| AnAnt | lfaraone: pbuilder uses apt, but it doesn't get the mirrors from /etc/apt/sources.list | 19:29 |
| AnAnt | lfaraone: it gets them either from command line or /etc/pbuilderrc | 19:29 |
| maco | lfaraone: pbuilders have their own /etc/apt/sources.list though | 19:31 |
| === paul__ is now known as Elbrus | ||
| maco | you can login to pbuilders | 19:31 |
| AnAnt | ah, done it | 19:32 |
| AnAnt | --mirror file:/cdrom | 19:32 |
| AnAnt | got it from debian bug 1666651 | 19:33 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Debian: HTTP Error 404: No such bug (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1666651;mbox=yes) | 19:33 |
| AnAnt | got it from debian bug 166651 | 19:33 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 166651 in pbuilder "pbuilder: please support CDs" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/166651 | 19:33 |
| superm1 | AnAnt, add that to the wiki page if you can | 19:35 |
| AnAnt | well, this seems to have a problem on subsequent pbuilder update though | 19:36 |
| AnAnt | oh, I got other errors | 19:36 |
| AnAnt | W: Failed to fetch file:/cdrom/dists/jaunty/main/binary-i386/Packages File not found | 19:38 |
| AnAnt | that causes pbuilder to abort with error | 19:39 |
| AnAnt | I see that there is /cdrom/dists/jaunty/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz | 19:39 |
| AnAnt | ie. gzip'ed | 19:39 |
| ahasenack | are there people from Ubuntu QA here in this channel? I was wondering if we could get https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/309042 fixed for jaunty at least | 19:41 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 309042 in console-setup "Intrepid: no "brazil - thinkpad" keyboard layout option anymore" [Undecided,New] | 19:41 |
| nxvl | nixternal: ping | 19:48 |
| AnAnt | why is it trying to fetch cdrom/dists/jaunty/main/binary-i386/Packages instead of cdrom/dists/jaunty/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz ?! | 19:50 |
| nixternal | nxvl: pongalong | 19:50 |
| nxvl | nixternal: whouldn't you want to run the session of 23rd April, 00:00 UTC?? | 19:51 |
| nixternal | what session? | 19:51 |
| nxvl | nixternal: http://ubuntupackaging.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/packaging-training-kicking-off-this-week/ | 19:51 |
| nixternal | nxvl: unsure if I can commit to that just yet, but I would be interested in some Kubuntu packaging stuff on that list | 19:54 |
| nxvl | nixternal: that's fine, we are going to do it every thursday | 19:55 |
| nxvl | nixternal: rotatin hours like it said there | 19:55 |
| nxvl | nixternal: i'm just trying to file the white space of the 23th | 19:55 |
| nixternal | let me find someone for you | 19:56 |
| nxvl | nixternal: \o/ | 19:56 |
| nxvl | nixternal: even a 15 minutes session + Q&A is welcomed | 19:56 |
| === mathiaz_ is now known as mathiaz | ||
| === foursixnine is now known as santiago-ve | ||
| AnAnt | heimdal-dev is a virtual package ?! | 20:28 |
| AnAnt | what's wrong with pbuilder ?! | 20:30 |
| cody-somerville | nothing | 20:30 |
| cody-somerville | pbuilder uses apt | 20:30 |
| DktrKranz | AnAnt, it's not | 20:30 |
| AnAnt | pbuilder is failing to build a package because it thinks that heimdal-dev, libfsplib-dev, libmozjs-dev and libtre-dev are virtual packages ! | 20:31 |
| jpds | AnAnt: Do you ave universe enabled in your pbuilder setup? | 20:33 |
| AnAnt | yup | 20:33 |
| AnAnt | and done pbuilder update | 20:34 |
| fabrice_sp | Hi DktrKranz. It seems Bug #345263 is stuck. What should be the next step? | 20:35 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 345263 in ubuntu "Sync php-mdb2 2.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/345263 | 20:35 |
| AnAnt | how does it get the notion that those packages are virtual ? | 20:35 |
| fabrice_sp | AnAnt, try to login to pbuilder, and check what is the content of source.list | 20:37 |
| AnAnt | fabrice_sp: I just done that, found that universe & multiverse are enabled there, so I logged using --save-after-login, and enabled them, and now running apt-get update | 20:39 |
| fabrice_sp | ok | 20:39 |
| AnAnt | thanks | 20:39 |
| fabrice_sp | good luck with pbuilder :-) | 20:39 |
| AnAnt | thanks | 20:40 |
| cjwatson | ahasenack: 309042> surely getting bugs fixed is a function of development, not QA | 21:11 |
| ahasenack | cjwatson: I was under the impression QA was the first step: they would triage it and assign it the right milestone | 21:12 |
| cjwatson | ahasenack: yay paperwork | 21:12 |
| ahasenack | cjwatson: :) | 21:12 |
| cjwatson | I'll deal with it, I might actually get it right | 21:12 |
| cjwatson | the keyboard subsystem is difficult and I'm not aware that QA is deeply familiar with the ins and outs of it (I wouldn't blame them) | 21:13 |
| ahasenack | cjwatson: \o/ thanks! | 21:13 |
| cjwatson | ahasenack: but just as a basic comment, the set of layouts and variants that exists is actually under the control of xkeyboard-config, not console-setup | 21:14 |
| cjwatson | ahasenack: the reason it wasn't changelogged in console-setup is that console-setup just gets updated from xkeyboard-config on each rebuild | 21:15 |
| ahasenack | aha | 21:15 |
| cjwatson | I'll make sure that it isn't getting left out for some other reason before reassigning the bug | 21:15 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Igorot is now known as Knightlust | ||
| maco | is there a way to specify to dh_make whether its gplv2 or v3? | 22:10 |
| maco | or does it not have to be that specific? | 22:11 |
| marnold | maco, iirc no | 22:12 |
| maco | is that to both? | 22:12 |
| === azeem_ is now known as azeem | ||
| cjwatson | maco: why not just edit it after dh_make has finished? it's only meant to be a first pass | 22:19 |
| maco | cjwatson: well the second question was to ask if the control file has to say which gpl version or just "gpl" | 22:21 |
| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
| cjwatson | maco: licensing goes in debian/copyright rather than debian/control; but yes, it should say which GPL version is involved, although that might be "v2 or later" or similar | 22:22 |
| maco | oops. ok thank you | 22:24 |
| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!