/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/03/31/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asacheh. launchpad ppa is down?00:07
asaccannot upload00:07
ftahm, i don't think so00:07
asachttp://blog.launchpad.net/maintenance00:10
asacso nothing00:10
ftathat's for tomorrow00:12
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa  too bad, almost all green00:13
asac yeah now it works for me too00:16
ftaok so now, i pushed the transitioned ff to my own ppa, to update those who are not using the dailies00:21
ftalet's see how popcon reacts to that00:21
fta11752 firefox-3.1                     1905   320   785   740    60 (Unknown)00:21
fta22960 firefox-3.2                      322    28    98   167    29 (Unknown)00:21
fta31361 firefox-3.5                      100     8     0    92     0 (Unknown)00:21
fta35974 firefox-3.6                       51     8     0    43     0 (Unknown)00:21
ftawe'll be fixed next week though00:22
fta-fixed+sure00:22
ftafunny:00:24
fta22534 iceweasel                        342    17   321     4     0 (Unknown)00:24
fta34586 icedove                           63     2    58     3     0 (Unknown)00:24
asacheh00:24
ftascary:00:25
fta1328  msttcorefonts                  370622    18 62724     8 307872 (Thijs Kinkhorst)00:25
asacflashplugin-nonfree seems to be rdepend'ish00:26
asacbut suggest00:27
asacmaybe we install it by default?00:27
ftamsttcorefonts? i don't think so, it was not in my new desktop at work, i had to install it for chromium00:29
BUGabundoguud morning ppl09:14
asacguud morning BUGabundo09:15
BUGabundohey asac09:41
asacuiuiui10:15
asacmy bug karma got a boost ;) ... i am at 100k again ;)10:15
asacerr "karma" ... not "bug karma"10:15
BUGabundo100k?10:16
BUGabundoI just have 11k10:16
BUGabundoits all that work on ppa and teams, isn't it?10:17
asacno its main distro work10:17
asacmostly10:17
asacseems rosetta karma went out of band: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+topcontributors10:18
asacdefinitly a bug10:18
asaceverbody has 100's of K translation karma10:18
BUGabundoasac are you trying to become a µblogging spammer?10:33
BUGabundolol10:33
asac_why? ;)10:33
BUGabundoehe10:33
asac_i think most should be ok as long as you dont misuse it for private chatting10:34
BUGabundohumm 30 dents in such a small period of time10:34
BUGabundoeheh10:34
asac_30?10:34
BUGabundoyou are over compensating for when you are quiet10:34
asac_yeah10:34
BUGabundoI lost count! I just see you nick on pretty much every OSD bubbl10:34
asac_probably have high variance depending on whether gwibber being open or not10:34
asac_hehe10:34
asac_remember that OSD bubbles often display twice ;)10:35
asac_(e.g. i think its a gwibber notification bug)10:35
BUGabundomaybe10:35
BUGabundoI get some twice10:35
BUGabundo$ pkill notify-osd10:35
BUGabundoshould do it10:35
=== asac_ is now known as asac
BUGabundoasac: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/32979810:38
ubottuUbuntu bug 329798 in network-manager "NM will not connect to FON AP" [Undecided,New]10:38
BUGabundodo you know if both does users are using archive or ppa nm version?10:38
BUGabundoasac: I asked them10:43
asaci already asked something10:43
BUGabundoheh10:44
BUGabundosetting to incomplete10:44
BUGabundoLOL10:44
BUGabundoI'm the OP, and now I'm helping others!10:45
BUGabundobtw I have two logs here of low signal10:45
BUGabundowant me to pastebin them?10:45
BUGabundohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/141288/10:45
BUGabundohttp://paste.ubuntu.com/141289/10:45
asacBUGabundo: can you connect using wpasupplicant manually? (e.g. without NM)?10:47
asacyeah your second paste shows that there is instability10:48
asacif its driver related its really too deep for anyone, but the driver maintainer10:48
BUGabundoits intel10:50
BUGabundothe 1st was at home with a neibours open wifi10:50
BUGabundothe 2nd was out side my office10:50
BUGabundomaybe the 3 walls between laptop and AP (FON) weren't making it easy10:50
BUGabundostill 40-50% signal and failing to connect via wpasup is very bad!10:51
BUGabundoopen wifi actually connected out side the office10:51
BUGabundobut then again this place is overrun with wifi signals! I count over 1010:51
asacBUGabundo: 40-50% is really bad signal11:06
asacmeaning: that the slightest interference thing can kill your connection11:07
asacif you get better stability on windows that would be interesting11:07
asac(using same hardware/connect method)11:07
BUGabundoasac: I don't use windows11:15
BUGabundothis laptop never even seen it11:16
asacfta_nano: look at sebs karma ... now hiw 24/7 bugwork is worth nothing ;)11:16
asacat least seemlingly not worth the effort ;)11:16
BUGabundoheheh11:16
BUGabundoyou guys value karma too much!11:16
BUGabundoI never look at it!11:16
* asac neither11:17
asacbut its funny sometimes ;)11:17
BUGabundowas only when jneves mention it on my wiki profile11:17
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~seb128/+karma11:17
BUGabundoyeah Roseta is much more valuevale11:17
BUGabundolet me do a few strings and boots mine11:17
BUGabundoehhe11:17
ftaasac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma-seb128.png11:23
asacfta: thats not updated ;)11:23
asache has 600K now11:24
fta?11:24
ftareload11:24
asacheh right11:24
asacbad ffox cache11:24
asacor your server doesnt sent right modified headers11:24
ftaLast-Modified: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:23:12 GMT11:24
asachmm. so ffox bug11:25
asacmaybe problem with timezones ;)11:25
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/141309/11:25
ftait's my last debian server11:25
BUGabundoohhh no http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma-bugabundo.png11:41
NafalloBUGabundo: nice 404...11:43
BUGabundoNafallo: yeah11:43
gnomefreakcan i use firefox's fsh patch in SM-211:46
asacgnomefreak: no ;)11:47
gnomefreakwell that sucks hard11:47
asacgnomefreak: look at what we do for ffox 3.5 and xul 1.9.111:47
gnomefreaki can use that patch?11:47
gnomefreakfsh looks like a general patch11:48
gnomefreakhint its starting to really piss me off11:48
gnomefreakif i let patch fail than i have no upstream dir. but that is only way to get the rej file11:49
gnomefreakmozilla/config/Makefile.in11:49
asacgnomefreak: sounds odd12:01
gnomefreakautoconf2.13 == cd mozilla, pop -a, autoconf2.13 : these commands cause upstream patches to no longer be there. what am i missing, this happens in /mozilla/mozilla as well. I ran diff on rej and our patch and nothing is different12:01
asacare you sure your tarball is correct?12:01
gnomefreakim assuming so since it was made by ./debian orig-source12:02
gnomefreaksorry its ./debian/rules get-orig-sourc12:02
gnomefreak+e12:03
gnomefreakit has failed last 3 tarballs so i would guess tarball is good12:03
gnomefreakthis has been a pain in my side for 2 weeks or so nothing seems to work12:04
asacwell. if it always fails i dont see how that proofs that the tarball is good12:04
gnomefreakasac: not the same tarball each time12:04
asacgnomefreak: you need to create the patches link in the mozilla/ dir12:04
gnomefreakcopt debian/patches to /mozilla/mozilla/patches?12:05
* gnomefreak still not sure why there are 2 mozilla dirs12:05
asacgnomefreak: two mozilla dirs == tarball is wrong12:06
asacmost likely mozclient issue12:06
asacor well12:06
asacgnomefreak: actually you have to copy it to first mozilla dir12:06
asacthe second one is the comm-central one12:07
asacso do that12:07
gnomefreakasac: i would but even in /mozilla no such patches dir12:07
gnomefreakah ok im grabbing branch again and make new tarball and see if that helps12:08
asacgnomefreak: no tarball is good i guess12:10
asacpatches have to go into first mozilla/ dir12:10
gnomefreakasac: off hand do you know if cleaner_dist_clean.patch was applied upstream? i havent gottena  minute to look at it yet12:26
gnomefreakit seems now fsh applies but cleaner_dist.... doesnt12:28
asachmm. unlikely it was applied completely12:28
asacbut i cannot tell for sure12:28
gnomefreakill look at it before pop -a there is no quilt edit patch is there. if not than i should be able to edit patch using textt editor right?12:30
* gnomefreak hopes to have this building before i start my day since il; be tied up most of day12:32
gnomefreakasac: before i forget, did you get a chance to review/push SM-1.1.15?12:34
BUGabundoasac: what's up with flash?12:35
BUGabundoevery 20 min an user popups on +1 asking about it12:35
asacgnomefreak: see identi.ca ;)12:35
asacgnomefreak: i merged your branches. you can mark them merged again12:35
gnomefreakah ok looking12:35
asacand uplaoded to jaunty12:35
asacyeah12:35
gnomefreakmark what branch as merged mine?12:36
asacgnomefreak: yes12:37
asacyour branches are merged, so you can let them go and create new ones next time12:37
BUGabundojust hear that twitter is going to be paid! ROFL good bye!12:37
asacunlikely i would say12:37
asacmaybe they add a "pro" option ;)12:37
BUGabundoyeah12:37
asacbut you cannot reawlly charge money ;)12:38
BUGabundo1 free 3 paid12:38
gnomefreakasac: ok cool thanks ill look at them in a few12:38
asacgnomefreak: no need to. just mark them merged -> done12:38
gnomefreakah12:38
BUGabundoApril’s fool fail?12:38
asaclol12:38
asacits 31st mar12:38
BUGabundofail!12:38
* gnomefreak be back i need a smoke #1 of the day been up for 3 hours already12:53
fta2BUGabundo, lol, "GET /ubuntu/tmp/karma-bugabundo.png HTTP/1.1" 40413:08
gnomefreakha found one of the problems :)13:23
gnomefreakis there a quilt command to edit a patch?13:24
asacgnomefreak: quilt push -f13:26
asacfix stuff13:26
asacquilt refresh13:26
gnomefreakk thx13:27
BUGabundofta yeah I already laugh at it14:04
* BUGabundo starts spamming identica users14:21
fta2asac, debian has libnss3-1d_3.12.2.with.ckbi.1.73-1, wtf is that?15:47
asacthats what we have ;)15:47
fta2with.ckbi.1.73 ?15:47
asacthat thes NSS_3_12_2_WITH_CKBI_1_7_73 tag?15:48
fta2oh15:48
fta2lol15:48
asachehe15:48
asacno seriously15:48
asacnot sure if they created that tag15:48
asacbut they created something like that for 3_1115:48
asacwhich version did i use?15:48
asacor did i even fail to update that in jaunty?15:49
asacnss (3.12.2+cbki.1.73-ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low15:49
asacmy name is better ;)15:49
fta2ok, nm then ;)15:49
asacits the rogue certificate fix15:50
asacthey created a minitag/branch for that fix15:50
asacits basically just blacklisting a rogue md5 certicate presented at some security conference15:50
fta2ok, i remember now, i read something about this15:51
asacmozilla Bug 471715, Add cert to nssckbi to override rogue md5-collision CA cert15:54
asacr=nelsonb, r=wtc Bug 471715, Add cert to nssckbi to override rogue md5-collision CA cert15:54
ubottuMozilla bug 471715 in Libraries "Add cert to nssckbi to override rogue md5-collision CA cert" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47171515:54
ubottuError: Launchpad bug 471715 could not be found15:54
asacr=nelsonb, r=wtc15:54
* asac on mission impossible: bumping xul from 1.8.0.4 to 1.8.1.18+cvs16:18
asaclets see if it builds in gutsy ;)16:18
asacsomehow our gutsy compiler is way faster ;)16:19
BUGabundodiff flags16:21
BUGabundoppl keep bashing on that16:22
asacdiff flags?16:44
jcastrofta2: that bug is for newer webkits than what's in jaunty afaik17:26
jcastrofta2: I think the only concern is there were some keyring crashers17:26
* BUGabundo finds cross talk funny17:26
BUGabundojcastro: I'm one of them17:27
BUGabundoI can't keep gwibber open for more then 20 mins17:27
jcastro1.0 branch?17:27
BUGabundoCouldn't retrieve GConf value for key: password17:27
BUGabundokeep getting that17:27
BUGabundo  Installed: 1.0.1~bzr277-0ubuntu1~daily117:27
jcastropretty sure that is trunk not 1.0 branch17:28
BUGabundoits trunk17:29
BUGabundoit is what ever fta daily ppa fetch17:30
jcastroyeah, I don't care about that right now, we know that's broken17:30
jcastroI care about what we're putting into Jaunty17:30
jcastrothe keyring thing is crashing for the upstream author as well17:31
fta2jcastro, so 1.0 is not ready then?17:32
jcastrofta2: I think 1.0 is ready17:32
jcastroit's trunk that's a mess17:32
BUGabundofta is there any other daily bruch that works?17:33
BUGabundoor I better downgrade?17:33
BUGabundoto 0.8-0ubuntu317:33
jcastrojust use the build in jaunty17:33
jcastrothat one works17:33
fta2jcastro, ok so i just need oldmanuk or someone else commit the right version number. it's still 0.9.117:34
fta2http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/gwibber-1.0/annotate/head%3A/gwibber//client.py17:34
fta2line 4317:34
BUGabundoblows like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/141550/17:35
fta2BUGabundo, the daily one is working for me on 4 different PCs17:35
BUGabundofta2 see http://paste.ubuntu.com/141550/17:35
BUGabundoI get a bunch of those daily17:35
jcastrofta2: yep I've asked him to join us here so we can finalize these last few bits and be done with it17:36
* BUGabundo downgrading gwibber and testing17:39
BUGabundo /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/microblog/support/facelib.py:47: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead17:39
jcastrohalf the archive has that warning. :p17:40
fta2yep17:40
fta2asac, 1.8.1.18+nobinonly.b308.cvs20090331t155113-0ubuntu0.7.10.1 yeck! :P17:41
asacyeah. this upload has a bunch of world records17:41
asac1. longest version ;)17:41
asac2. most MFSAs ever listed in a single changelog entry ;)17:41
asacprobably also most security fixes in one upload17:41
Ampelbeinping asac : about changing bug's status to invalid when duping them. you have commented in one report i marked duplicate and stated that you don't know why I closed the report. bug #345418 . I thought it to be common practice to set status invalid. seen it by done by many people.17:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 345418 in network-manager "NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in nm_device_get_udi() (dup-of: 319918)" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/34541817:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 319918 in network-manager "MASTER NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in nm_device_get_udi()" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/31991817:42
fta2that's gutsy?17:42
fta2i thought it was eol17:42
BUGabundojcastro: will anyone be working on jaiku new API?17:42
asacfta2: http://paste.ubuntu.com/141553/17:43
jcastroBUGabundo: dunno17:43
fta2asac, lol17:43
jcastrofta2: ryan tells me that the keyring problem is evident in both 1.0 and trunk17:44
jcastroiirc something changed in the gnome keyring this cycle didn't it?17:44
fta2how come i don't it then? strange17:45
fta2+see17:45
jcastronor me17:46
jcastrohe says he can reproduce it consistently.17:46
BUGabundoI can17:46
BUGabundoand several users on LP17:46
jcastroBUGabundo: on 1.0 branch?17:46
BUGabundodaily17:46
jcastrodude, we are testing 1.017:46
jcastrowhat is going into ubuntu17:46
jcastronot trunk or daily or whatever17:46
BUGabundofta daily fetch 1.0 branch?17:46
jcastroyou need to pull the 1.0 branch from bzr17:46
fta2no17:46
fta2all my dailies are tracking trunk17:47
BUGabundoright now I'm using the Jaunty version17:47
BUGabundoI downgraged17:47
fta20.8 ?17:47
BUGabundoill let you know if it crashes if a while17:47
BUGabundoyes fta17:47
fta2ok, I should just push a fresher 0.9.1 to the team ppa, for testing...17:47
BUGabundoand PPA team also has 0.817:47
fta2(but 0.8 is old)17:48
BUGabundoyeah17:48
BUGabundothat's why I use daily17:48
BUGabundois there any ppa with 1.0, but not trunk?17:48
fta2no17:51
BUGabundothen I can only fetch it from bzr17:51
fta2jcastro, just pushed the latest commit of the 1.0 branch (0.9.1~bzr255) to the team ppa, for those willing to test it18:12
jcastro\o/18:15
* asac_the_bumber waves18:22
asachi armin18:23
asacarmin76: back?18:23
asac_the_bumberi never left :P18:23
asachmm did someone unvoice you ;)?18:24
asac_the_bumbernope, just got more interesting things to do :P18:24
asac_the_bumberi may have the definitive sparc patch :D18:24
asachehe18:24
asac_the_bumbertesting it now18:24
asacthats a great come back then ;)18:25
asacfta: there? are you running UNR?20:10
asacwhats env of DESKTOP_SESSION?20:10
ftayes20:10
fta_nanoGNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID=this-is-deprecated20:11
fta_nanohm20:11
fta_nanoDESKTOP_SESSION=default20:11
asacdefault20:11
asachmm20:11
asac_the_bumberbumb!20:27
asac_the_bumberwhats this stuff20:27
asac_the_bumberoh20:27
BUGabundofta chromiun will not install20:35
BUGabundoon daily image20:35
ftalogs?20:35
BUGabundobecause of depencecies20:35
BUGabundomsttcorefons20:35
BUGabundoon font ftf-libveration20:36
fta?20:36
BUGabundoits what synaptic tells me20:36
ftaplz pastebin an apt-get intall chromiun-browser (or upgrade)20:40
BUGabundook20:41
BUGabundofta http://paste.ubuntu.com/141656/20:42
ftahm, i added that dep ~2 weeks ago20:44
ftait's not clear from that paste why it's a problem20:45
BUGabundoto me neither20:45
BUGabundoi have the same repo on the laptop20:45
BUGabundoand its working20:45
ftatry apt-get intall chromiun-browser msttcorefonts20:45
BUGabundoahh20:46
BUGabundomirror probs20:46
BUGabundolet me change it20:46
ftamsttcorefonts should drag ttf-mscorefonts-installer in20:47
BUGabundoit works now20:47
BUGabundoit was repo trouble20:47
BUGabundosorry for the noise20:47
ftaBUGabundo, so, gwibber?20:50
ftait's the team ppa now btw20:50
BUGabundook20:50
BUGabundotomorrow ill upgrade20:50
BUGabundomy laptop isnt booting since the last updates20:50
BUGabundoim running it from LiveUSB20:51
BUGabundoLOL20:51
ftahow come i never have any of those issues?20:51
ftamaybe you're doomed20:51
BUGabundoi dont know20:51
ftaor cursed20:51
BUGabundomaybe20:51
BUGabundonever mind20:51
BUGabundoit gives me extra change to file bugs20:52
BUGabundojust by booting this daily liveusb20:52
BUGabundoi can file 4 new bugs20:52
BUGabundoi see 2 battery icons20:52
BUGabundobrasero has a tray icon20:52
BUGabundotime is in the wrong time zone20:52
BUGabundoa bluetooth icon20:53
BUGabundoa bunch of stuff!!20:53
BUGabundofound intel 865 bug and confirmed workaround for bryce20:53
BUGabundoetc20:53
BUGabundo$ sudo chroot /tmp/disco/ chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': Exec format error20:54
BUGabundohow nice of bash20:54
ftad'oh!! sm-mta[17772]: n2VJspJB017772: SYSERR(root): out of memory: Cannot allocate memory20:56
BUGabundoLOLOL20:56
BUGabundoso u have yuor own troubles too20:56
ftait's a debian server20:56
BUGabundolenny?20:57
ftasid20:59
ftahm, it's clamav-milter21:03
BUGabundoi have no idea how to bypass the chroot error21:06
ftawhat does "file /tmp/disco/bin/bash" give you?21:07
BUGabundo /tmp/disco/bin/bash: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped21:09
ftayou're on adm64?21:10
BUGabundoand now i core dumped gksu LOL21:10
ftalooks like your main host is 32b21:10
BUGabundoyes fta21:10
BUGabundoahh21:11
BUGabundoi remember now21:11
BUGabundohost is 64b21:11
BUGabundobut livecd is 3221:11
BUGabundoduh21:11
BUGabundoi keep forgeting that21:11
BUGabundoLOLOL apport cant file the gksu crash cause of python21:11
BUGabundoehehe21:11
ftathere's on live 64?21:12
BUGabundono... thats on another pc21:12
BUGabundowith 32 live cd21:12
BUGabundobut theres is live64 too21:12
BUGabundowhy woulnd it there be?21:12
BUGabundoi had it on my flashpen, but installed 32 yesterday to remove virus from a PC21:13
BUGabundoforgot to put 64 back21:13
BUGabundotonighg i 'll run a CD and dd it to flashpen 64b to chroot to my laptop21:13
xjjkhallo, has anyone (personally) enabled profile-guided optimization on their firefox packages?21:25
xjjkI'm having trouble understanding Firefox's debian/rules file21:26
fta[reed], how can i find which bug removed some files using hgweb?22:50
ftalike embedding/browser/gtk/src/gtkmozembed_common.h22:50
[reed]um23:25
fta[reed], i want to understand what happened to some gtkmozembed* files23:36
ftait broke a patch23:37
[reed]I'm not sure23:37
[reed]ask #developers23:37
[reed]or #hg23:37
ftagot it, mozilla 48470823:42
ubottuMozilla bug 484708 in Build Config "Intermittent bustage building embedding/browser/gtk/src/gtkmozembed2.cpp" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48470823:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!