[00:07] <asac> heh. launchpad ppa is down?
[00:07] <asac> cannot upload
[00:07] <fta> hm, i don't think so
[00:10] <asac> http://blog.launchpad.net/maintenance
[00:10] <asac> so nothing
[00:12] <fta> that's for tomorrow
[00:13] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa  too bad, almost all green
[00:16] <asac>  yeah now it works for me too
[00:21] <fta> ok so now, i pushed the transitioned ff to my own ppa, to update those who are not using the dailies
[00:21] <fta> let's see how popcon reacts to that
[00:21] <fta> 11752 firefox-3.1                     1905   320   785   740    60 (Unknown)
[00:21] <fta> 22960 firefox-3.2                      322    28    98   167    29 (Unknown)
[00:21] <fta> 31361 firefox-3.5                      100     8     0    92     0 (Unknown)
[00:21] <fta> 35974 firefox-3.6                       51     8     0    43     0 (Unknown)
[00:22] <fta> we'll be fixed next week though
[00:22] <fta> -fixed+sure
[00:24] <fta> funny:
[00:24] <fta> 22534 iceweasel                        342    17   321     4     0 (Unknown)
[00:24] <fta> 34586 icedove                           63     2    58     3     0 (Unknown)
[00:24] <asac> heh
[00:25] <fta> scary:
[00:25] <fta> 1328  msttcorefonts                  370622    18 62724     8 307872 (Thijs Kinkhorst)
[00:26] <asac> flashplugin-nonfree seems to be rdepend'ish
[00:27] <asac> but suggest
[00:27] <asac> maybe we install it by default?
[00:29] <fta> msttcorefonts? i don't think so, it was not in my new desktop at work, i had to install it for chromium
[09:14] <BUGabundo> guud morning ppl
[09:15] <asac> guud morning BUGabundo
[09:41] <BUGabundo> hey asac
[10:15] <asac> uiuiui
[10:15] <asac> my bug karma got a boost ;) ... i am at 100k again ;)
[10:15] <asac> err "karma" ... not "bug karma"
[10:16] <BUGabundo> 100k?
[10:16] <BUGabundo> I just have 11k
[10:17] <BUGabundo> its all that work on ppa and teams, isn't it?
[10:17] <asac> no its main distro work
[10:17] <asac> mostly
[10:18] <asac> seems rosetta karma went out of band: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+topcontributors
[10:18] <asac> definitly a bug
[10:18] <asac> everbody has 100's of K translation karma
[10:33] <BUGabundo> asac are you trying to become a µblogging spammer?
[10:33] <BUGabundo> lol
[10:33] <asac_> why? ;)
[10:33] <BUGabundo> ehe
[10:34] <asac_> i think most should be ok as long as you dont misuse it for private chatting
[10:34] <BUGabundo> humm 30 dents in such a small period of time
[10:34] <BUGabundo> eheh
[10:34] <asac_> 30?
[10:34] <BUGabundo> you are over compensating for when you are quiet
[10:34] <asac_> yeah
[10:34] <BUGabundo> I lost count! I just see you nick on pretty much every OSD bubbl
[10:34] <asac_> probably have high variance depending on whether gwibber being open or not
[10:34] <asac_> hehe
[10:35] <asac_> remember that OSD bubbles often display twice ;)
[10:35] <asac_> (e.g. i think its a gwibber notification bug)
[10:35] <BUGabundo> maybe
[10:35] <BUGabundo> I get some twice
[10:35] <BUGabundo> $ pkill notify-osd
[10:35] <BUGabundo> should do it
[10:38] <BUGabundo> asac: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/329798
[10:38] <BUGabundo> do you know if both does users are using archive or ppa nm version?
[10:43] <BUGabundo> asac: I asked them
[10:43] <asac> i already asked something
[10:44] <BUGabundo> heh
[10:44] <BUGabundo> setting to incomplete
[10:44] <BUGabundo> LOL
[10:45] <BUGabundo> I'm the OP, and now I'm helping others!
[10:45] <BUGabundo> btw I have two logs here of low signal
[10:45] <BUGabundo> want me to pastebin them?
[10:45] <BUGabundo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/141288/
[10:45] <BUGabundo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/141289/
[10:47] <asac> BUGabundo: can you connect using wpasupplicant manually? (e.g. without NM)?
[10:48] <asac> yeah your second paste shows that there is instability
[10:48] <asac> if its driver related its really too deep for anyone, but the driver maintainer
[10:50] <BUGabundo> its intel
[10:50] <BUGabundo> the 1st was at home with a neibours open wifi
[10:50] <BUGabundo> the 2nd was out side my office
[10:50] <BUGabundo> maybe the 3 walls between laptop and AP (FON) weren't making it easy
[10:51] <BUGabundo> still 40-50% signal and failing to connect via wpasup is very bad!
[10:51] <BUGabundo> open wifi actually connected out side the office
[10:51] <BUGabundo> but then again this place is overrun with wifi signals! I count over 10
[11:06] <asac> BUGabundo: 40-50% is really bad signal
[11:07] <asac> meaning: that the slightest interference thing can kill your connection
[11:07] <asac> if you get better stability on windows that would be interesting
[11:07] <asac> (using same hardware/connect method)
[11:15] <BUGabundo> asac: I don't use windows
[11:16] <BUGabundo> this laptop never even seen it
[11:16] <asac> fta_nano: look at sebs karma ... now hiw 24/7 bugwork is worth nothing ;)
[11:16] <asac> at least seemlingly not worth the effort ;)
[11:16] <BUGabundo> heheh
[11:16] <BUGabundo> you guys value karma too much!
[11:16] <BUGabundo> I never look at it!
[11:17]  * asac  neither
[11:17] <asac> but its funny sometimes ;)
[11:17] <BUGabundo> was only when jneves mention it on my wiki profile
[11:17] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~seb128/+karma
[11:17] <BUGabundo> yeah Roseta is much more valuevale
[11:17] <BUGabundo> let me do a few strings and boots mine
[11:17] <BUGabundo> ehhe
[11:23] <fta> asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma-seb128.png
[11:23] <asac> fta: thats not updated ;)
[11:24] <asac> he has 600K now
[11:24] <fta> ?
[11:24] <fta> reload
[11:24] <asac> heh right
[11:24] <asac> bad ffox cache
[11:24] <asac> or your server doesnt sent right modified headers
[11:24] <fta> Last-Modified: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:23:12 GMT
[11:25] <asac> hmm. so ffox bug
[11:25] <asac> maybe problem with timezones ;)
[11:25] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/141309/
[11:25] <fta> it's my last debian server
[11:41] <BUGabundo> ohhh no http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma-bugabundo.png
[11:43] <Nafallo> BUGabundo: nice 404...
[11:43] <BUGabundo> Nafallo: yeah
[11:46] <gnomefreak> can i use firefox's fsh patch in SM-2
[11:47] <asac> gnomefreak: no ;)
[11:47] <gnomefreak> well that sucks hard
[11:47] <asac> gnomefreak: look at what we do for ffox 3.5 and xul 1.9.1
[11:47] <gnomefreak> i can use that patch?
[11:48] <gnomefreak> fsh looks like a general patch
[11:48] <gnomefreak> hint its starting to really piss me off
[11:49] <gnomefreak> if i let patch fail than i have no upstream dir. but that is only way to get the rej file
[11:49] <gnomefreak> mozilla/config/Makefile.in
[12:01] <asac> gnomefreak: sounds odd
[12:01] <gnomefreak> autoconf2.13 == cd mozilla, pop -a, autoconf2.13 : these commands cause upstream patches to no longer be there. what am i missing, this happens in /mozilla/mozilla as well. I ran diff on rej and our patch and nothing is different
[12:01] <asac> are you sure your tarball is correct?
[12:02] <gnomefreak> im assuming so since it was made by ./debian orig-source
[12:02] <gnomefreak> sorry its ./debian/rules get-orig-sourc
[12:03] <gnomefreak> +e
[12:03] <gnomefreak> it has failed last 3 tarballs so i would guess tarball is good
[12:04] <gnomefreak> this has been a pain in my side for 2 weeks or so nothing seems to work
[12:04] <asac> well. if it always fails i dont see how that proofs that the tarball is good
[12:04] <gnomefreak> asac: not the same tarball each time
[12:04] <asac> gnomefreak: you need to create the patches link in the mozilla/ dir
[12:05] <gnomefreak> copt debian/patches to /mozilla/mozilla/patches?
[12:05]  * gnomefreak still not sure why there are 2 mozilla dirs
[12:06] <asac> gnomefreak: two mozilla dirs == tarball is wrong
[12:06] <asac> most likely mozclient issue
[12:06] <asac> or well
[12:06] <asac> gnomefreak: actually you have to copy it to first mozilla dir
[12:07] <asac> the second one is the comm-central one
[12:07] <asac> so do that
[12:07] <gnomefreak> asac: i would but even in /mozilla no such patches dir
[12:08] <gnomefreak> ah ok im grabbing branch again and make new tarball and see if that helps
[12:10] <asac> gnomefreak: no tarball is good i guess
[12:10] <asac> patches have to go into first mozilla/ dir
[12:26] <gnomefreak> asac: off hand do you know if cleaner_dist_clean.patch was applied upstream? i havent gottena  minute to look at it yet
[12:28] <gnomefreak> it seems now fsh applies but cleaner_dist.... doesnt
[12:28] <asac> hmm. unlikely it was applied completely
[12:28] <asac> but i cannot tell for sure
[12:30] <gnomefreak> ill look at it before pop -a there is no quilt edit patch is there. if not than i should be able to edit patch using textt editor right?
[12:32]  * gnomefreak hopes to have this building before i start my day since il; be tied up most of day
[12:34] <gnomefreak> asac: before i forget, did you get a chance to review/push SM-1.1.15?
[12:35] <BUGabundo> asac: what's up with flash?
[12:35] <BUGabundo> every 20 min an user popups on +1 asking about it
[12:35] <asac> gnomefreak: see identi.ca ;)
[12:35] <asac> gnomefreak: i merged your branches. you can mark them merged again
[12:35] <gnomefreak> ah ok looking
[12:35] <asac> and uplaoded to jaunty
[12:35] <asac> yeah
[12:36] <gnomefreak> mark what branch as merged mine?
[12:37] <asac> gnomefreak: yes
[12:37] <asac> your branches are merged, so you can let them go and create new ones next time
[12:37] <BUGabundo> just hear that twitter is going to be paid! ROFL good bye!
[12:37] <asac> unlikely i would say
[12:37] <asac> maybe they add a "pro" option ;)
[12:37] <BUGabundo> yeah
[12:38] <asac> but you cannot reawlly charge money ;)
[12:38] <BUGabundo> 1 free 3 paid
[12:38] <gnomefreak> asac: ok cool thanks ill look at them in a few
[12:38] <asac> gnomefreak: no need to. just mark them merged -> done
[12:38] <gnomefreak> ah
[12:38] <BUGabundo> April’s fool fail?
[12:38] <asac> lol
[12:38] <asac> its 31st mar
[12:38] <BUGabundo> fail!
[12:53]  * gnomefreak be back i need a smoke #1 of the day been up for 3 hours already
[13:08] <fta2> BUGabundo, lol, "GET /ubuntu/tmp/karma-bugabundo.png HTTP/1.1" 404
[13:23] <gnomefreak> ha found one of the problems :)
[13:24] <gnomefreak> is there a quilt command to edit a patch?
[13:26] <asac> gnomefreak: quilt push -f
[13:26] <asac> fix stuff
[13:26] <asac> quilt refresh
[13:27] <gnomefreak> k thx
[14:04] <BUGabundo> fta yeah I already laugh at it
[14:21]  * BUGabundo starts spamming identica users
[15:47] <fta2> asac, debian has libnss3-1d_3.12.2.with.ckbi.1.73-1, wtf is that?
[15:47] <asac> thats what we have ;)
[15:47] <fta2> with.ckbi.1.73 ?
[15:48] <asac> that thes NSS_3_12_2_WITH_CKBI_1_7_73 tag?
[15:48] <fta2> oh
[15:48] <fta2> lol
[15:48] <asac> hehe
[15:48] <asac> no seriously
[15:48] <asac> not sure if they created that tag
[15:48] <asac> but they created something like that for 3_11
[15:48] <asac> which version did i use?
[15:49] <asac> or did i even fail to update that in jaunty?
[15:49] <asac> nss (3.12.2+cbki.1.73-ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
[15:49] <asac> my name is better ;)
[15:49] <fta2> ok, nm then ;)
[15:50] <asac> its the rogue certificate fix
[15:50] <asac> they created a minitag/branch for that fix
[15:50] <asac> its basically just blacklisting a rogue md5 certicate presented at some security conference
[15:51] <fta2> ok, i remember now, i read something about this
[15:54] <asac> mozilla Bug 471715, Add cert to nssckbi to override rogue md5-collision CA cert
[15:54] <asac> r=nelsonb, r=wtc Bug 471715, Add cert to nssckbi to override rogue md5-collision CA cert
[15:54] <asac> r=nelsonb, r=wtc
[16:18]  * asac on mission impossible: bumping xul from 1.8.0.4 to 1.8.1.18+cvs
[16:18] <asac> lets see if it builds in gutsy ;)
[16:19] <asac> somehow our gutsy compiler is way faster ;)
[16:21] <BUGabundo> diff flags
[16:22] <BUGabundo> ppl keep bashing on that
[16:44] <asac> diff flags?
[17:26] <jcastro> fta2: that bug is for newer webkits than what's in jaunty afaik
[17:26] <jcastro> fta2: I think the only concern is there were some keyring crashers
[17:26]  * BUGabundo finds cross talk funny
[17:27] <BUGabundo> jcastro: I'm one of them
[17:27] <BUGabundo> I can't keep gwibber open for more then 20 mins
[17:27] <jcastro> 1.0 branch?
[17:27] <BUGabundo> Couldn't retrieve GConf value for key: password
[17:27] <BUGabundo> keep getting that
[17:27] <BUGabundo>   Installed: 1.0.1~bzr277-0ubuntu1~daily1
[17:28] <jcastro> pretty sure that is trunk not 1.0 branch
[17:29] <BUGabundo> its trunk
[17:30] <BUGabundo> it is what ever fta daily ppa fetch
[17:30] <jcastro> yeah, I don't care about that right now, we know that's broken
[17:30] <jcastro> I care about what we're putting into Jaunty
[17:31] <jcastro> the keyring thing is crashing for the upstream author as well
[17:32] <fta2> jcastro, so 1.0 is not ready then?
[17:32] <jcastro> fta2: I think 1.0 is ready
[17:32] <jcastro> it's trunk that's a mess
[17:33] <BUGabundo> fta is there any other daily bruch that works?
[17:33] <BUGabundo> or I better downgrade?
[17:33] <BUGabundo> to 0.8-0ubuntu3
[17:33] <jcastro> just use the build in jaunty
[17:33] <jcastro> that one works
[17:34] <fta2> jcastro, ok so i just need oldmanuk or someone else commit the right version number. it's still 0.9.1
[17:34] <fta2> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/gwibber-1.0/annotate/head%3A/gwibber//client.py
[17:34] <fta2> line 43
[17:35] <BUGabundo> blows like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/141550/
[17:35] <fta2> BUGabundo, the daily one is working for me on 4 different PCs
[17:35] <BUGabundo> fta2 see http://paste.ubuntu.com/141550/
[17:35] <BUGabundo> I get a bunch of those daily
[17:36] <jcastro> fta2: yep I've asked him to join us here so we can finalize these last few bits and be done with it
[17:39]  * BUGabundo downgrading gwibber and testing
[17:39] <BUGabundo>  /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/microblog/support/facelib.py:47: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
[17:40] <jcastro> half the archive has that warning. :p
[17:40] <fta2> yep
[17:41] <fta2> asac, 1.8.1.18+nobinonly.b308.cvs20090331t155113-0ubuntu0.7.10.1 yeck! :P
[17:41] <asac> yeah. this upload has a bunch of world records
[17:41] <asac> 1. longest version ;)
[17:41] <asac> 2. most MFSAs ever listed in a single changelog entry ;)
[17:41] <asac> probably also most security fixes in one upload
[17:41] <Ampelbein> ping asac : about changing bug's status to invalid when duping them. you have commented in one report i marked duplicate and stated that you don't know why I closed the report. bug #345418 . I thought it to be common practice to set status invalid. seen it by done by many people.
[17:42] <fta2> that's gutsy?
[17:42] <fta2> i thought it was eol
[17:42] <BUGabundo> jcastro: will anyone be working on jaiku new API?
[17:43] <asac> fta2: http://paste.ubuntu.com/141553/
[17:43] <jcastro> BUGabundo: dunno
[17:43] <fta2> asac, lol
[17:44] <jcastro> fta2: ryan tells me that the keyring problem is evident in both 1.0 and trunk
[17:44] <jcastro> iirc something changed in the gnome keyring this cycle didn't it?
[17:45] <fta2> how come i don't it then? strange
[17:45] <fta2> +see
[17:46] <jcastro> nor me
[17:46] <jcastro> he says he can reproduce it consistently.
[17:46] <BUGabundo> I can
[17:46] <BUGabundo> and several users on LP
[17:46] <jcastro> BUGabundo: on 1.0 branch?
[17:46] <BUGabundo> daily
[17:46] <jcastro> dude, we are testing 1.0
[17:46] <jcastro> what is going into ubuntu
[17:46] <jcastro> not trunk or daily or whatever
[17:46] <BUGabundo> fta daily fetch 1.0 branch?
[17:46] <jcastro> you need to pull the 1.0 branch from bzr
[17:46] <fta2> no
[17:47] <fta2> all my dailies are tracking trunk
[17:47] <BUGabundo> right now I'm using the Jaunty version
[17:47] <BUGabundo> I downgraged
[17:47] <fta2> 0.8 ?
[17:47] <BUGabundo> ill let you know if it crashes if a while
[17:47] <BUGabundo> yes fta
[17:47] <fta2> ok, I should just push a fresher 0.9.1 to the team ppa, for testing...
[17:47] <BUGabundo> and PPA team also has 0.8
[17:48] <fta2> (but 0.8 is old)
[17:48] <BUGabundo> yeah
[17:48] <BUGabundo> that's why I use daily
[17:48] <BUGabundo> is there any ppa with 1.0, but not trunk?
[17:51] <fta2> no
[17:51] <BUGabundo> then I can only fetch it from bzr
[18:12] <fta2> jcastro, just pushed the latest commit of the 1.0 branch (0.9.1~bzr255) to the team ppa, for those willing to test it
[18:15] <jcastro> \o/
[18:22]  * asac_the_bumber waves
[18:23] <asac> hi armin
[18:23] <asac> armin76: back?
[18:23] <asac_the_bumber> i never left :P
[18:24] <asac> hmm did someone unvoice you ;)?
[18:24] <asac_the_bumber> nope, just got more interesting things to do :P
[18:24] <asac_the_bumber> i may have the definitive sparc patch :D
[18:24] <asac> hehe
[18:24] <asac_the_bumber> testing it now
[18:25] <asac> thats a great come back then ;)
[20:10] <asac> fta: there? are you running UNR?
[20:10] <asac> whats env of DESKTOP_SESSION?
[20:10] <fta> yes
[20:11] <fta_nano> GNOME_DESKTOP_SESSION_ID=this-is-deprecated
[20:11] <fta_nano> hm
[20:11] <fta_nano> DESKTOP_SESSION=default
[20:11] <asac> default
[20:11] <asac> hmm
[20:27] <asac_the_bumber> bumb!
[20:27] <asac_the_bumber> whats this stuff
[20:27] <asac_the_bumber> oh
[20:35] <BUGabundo> fta chromiun will not install
[20:35] <BUGabundo> on daily image
[20:35] <fta> logs?
[20:35] <BUGabundo> because of depencecies
[20:35] <BUGabundo> msttcorefons
[20:36] <BUGabundo> on font ftf-libveration
[20:36] <fta> ?
[20:36] <BUGabundo> its what synaptic tells me
[20:40] <fta> plz pastebin an apt-get intall chromiun-browser (or upgrade)
[20:41] <BUGabundo> ok
[20:42] <BUGabundo> fta http://paste.ubuntu.com/141656/
[20:44] <fta> hm, i added that dep ~2 weeks ago
[20:45] <fta> it's not clear from that paste why it's a problem
[20:45] <BUGabundo> to me neither
[20:45] <BUGabundo> i have the same repo on the laptop
[20:45] <BUGabundo> and its working
[20:45] <fta> try apt-get intall chromiun-browser msttcorefonts
[20:46] <BUGabundo> ahh
[20:46] <BUGabundo> mirror probs
[20:46] <BUGabundo> let me change it
[20:47] <fta> msttcorefonts should drag ttf-mscorefonts-installer in
[20:47] <BUGabundo> it works now
[20:47] <BUGabundo> it was repo trouble
[20:47] <BUGabundo> sorry for the noise
[20:50] <fta> BUGabundo, so, gwibber?
[20:50] <fta> it's the team ppa now btw
[20:50] <BUGabundo> ok
[20:50] <BUGabundo> tomorrow ill upgrade
[20:50] <BUGabundo> my laptop isnt booting since the last updates
[20:51] <BUGabundo> im running it from LiveUSB
[20:51] <BUGabundo> LOL
[20:51] <fta> how come i never have any of those issues?
[20:51] <fta> maybe you're doomed
[20:51] <BUGabundo> i dont know
[20:51] <fta> or cursed
[20:51] <BUGabundo> maybe
[20:51] <BUGabundo> never mind
[20:52] <BUGabundo> it gives me extra change to file bugs
[20:52] <BUGabundo> just by booting this daily liveusb
[20:52] <BUGabundo> i can file 4 new bugs
[20:52] <BUGabundo> i see 2 battery icons
[20:52] <BUGabundo> brasero has a tray icon
[20:52] <BUGabundo> time is in the wrong time zone
[20:53] <BUGabundo> a bluetooth icon
[20:53] <BUGabundo> a bunch of stuff!!
[20:53] <BUGabundo> found intel 865 bug and confirmed workaround for bryce
[20:53] <BUGabundo> etc
[20:54] <BUGabundo> $ sudo chroot /tmp/disco/ chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': Exec format error
[20:54] <BUGabundo> how nice of bash
[20:56] <fta> d'oh!! sm-mta[17772]: n2VJspJB017772: SYSERR(root): out of memory: Cannot allocate memory
[20:56] <BUGabundo> LOLOL
[20:56] <BUGabundo> so u have yuor own troubles too
[20:56] <fta> it's a debian server
[20:57] <BUGabundo> lenny?
[20:59] <fta> sid
[21:03] <fta> hm, it's clamav-milter
[21:06] <BUGabundo> i have no idea how to bypass the chroot error
[21:07] <fta> what does "file /tmp/disco/bin/bash" give you?
[21:09] <BUGabundo>  /tmp/disco/bin/bash: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
[21:10] <fta> you're on adm64?
[21:10] <BUGabundo> and now i core dumped gksu LOL
[21:10] <fta> looks like your main host is 32b
[21:10] <BUGabundo> yes fta
[21:11] <BUGabundo> ahh
[21:11] <BUGabundo> i remember now
[21:11] <BUGabundo> host is 64b
[21:11] <BUGabundo> but livecd is 32
[21:11] <BUGabundo> duh
[21:11] <BUGabundo> i keep forgeting that
[21:11] <BUGabundo> LOLOL apport cant file the gksu crash cause of python
[21:11] <BUGabundo> ehehe
[21:12] <fta> there's on live 64?
[21:12] <BUGabundo> no... thats on another pc
[21:12] <BUGabundo> with 32 live cd
[21:12] <BUGabundo> but theres is live64 too
[21:12] <BUGabundo> why woulnd it there be?
[21:13] <BUGabundo> i had it on my flashpen, but installed 32 yesterday to remove virus from a PC
[21:13] <BUGabundo> forgot to put 64 back
[21:13] <BUGabundo> tonighg i 'll run a CD and dd it to flashpen 64b to chroot to my laptop
[21:25] <xjjk> hallo, has anyone (personally) enabled profile-guided optimization on their firefox packages?
[21:26] <xjjk> I'm having trouble understanding Firefox's debian/rules file
[22:50] <fta> [reed], how can i find which bug removed some files using hgweb?
[22:50] <fta> like embedding/browser/gtk/src/gtkmozembed_common.h
[23:25] <[reed]> um
[23:36] <fta> [reed], i want to understand what happened to some gtkmozembed* files
[23:37] <fta> it broke a patch
[23:37] <[reed]> I'm not sure
[23:37] <[reed]> ask #developers
[23:37] <[reed]> or #hg
[23:42] <fta> got it, mozilla 484708