[00:08] amitk: thanks, looking [00:26] amitk: it looks like a dupe of 315971. note from your alsa-info.sh output that 'Front' is muted. [00:27] amitk: please test combinations of unmuting 'Front' and 'Surround' [00:27] amitk: i'll leave it unduped for now === pgraner is now known as pgraner-zzzz === __Purple__ is now known as _Purple_ [06:24] Has anyone noticed horrible, horrible performance in Jaunty, which is quickly and easily solved by switching to AS via elevator=as on the kernel command line? [06:24] somebody broke CFQ :| it worked fine in the last release [06:26] which, kernel, speficially, is "the last release"? [06:28] bluefox@icebox:~$ uname -a [06:28] Linux icebox 2.6.28-11-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 2 04:39:54 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux [06:28] /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic_2.6.28-11.39_amd64.deb [06:28] pwnguin: oh, last release? [06:29] yes, as in not the current current ;) [06:29] whatever 8.10 was running 3 days before Jaunty went Beta [06:29] you removed it already? [06:29] itgot removed automatically when I upgraded. I wound up with 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 somehow [06:30] it's probably still in dpkg [06:30] I'm pretty sure 8.10 wasn't running 2.6.27 [06:30] it was at the very start [06:30] really? [06:30] i think so [06:30] huh. I thought they got through 2 or 3 releases between versions... [06:31] either way, yeah, then I removed it. [06:31] you probably still have some kernels around but not in grub? [06:32] they're not in dpkg [06:32] bluefox@icebox:~$ ls -l /boot/*.img* [06:32] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7891804 2009-04-03 01:04 /boot/initrd.img-2.6.28-11-generic [06:32] bluefox@icebox:~$ [06:32] well [06:32] anyway i need a shower real quick [06:32] how do you feel about git-bisect? [06:33] #*$& where'd i put the timer [06:33] what's git bisect [06:33] oh there it is [06:33] git bisect is a way to sort of binary search for things in the revision history [06:33] I have 40 minutes before bread has to be pulled from oven so I'll bbiab. Mind you this behavior's been around since I started using Jaunty, there wasn't a single minor kernel update that set it in play for me [06:34] have you by chance done anything with ext4? [06:37] i was watching ted t'so give a talk about ext4 and he mentioned something about ext4 being able to use ext3 filesystems, im not sure if that comes into play or what [06:38] well, im gonna play some video games and sleep [06:47] k [06:47] yes I started on ext3 and changed fstype to ext4, which helped a bit [06:47] it was worse on ext3, but ext3 has more real disk IO [07:20] hi guys [07:21] there's a few linux / git items on http://people.ubuntu.com/~dholbach/sponsoring/ - not sure if you're going to consider them, but could you take a look? [10:35] Any USB/kernel expert around? Can you have a look at bug 348316? Seems to be a low-level USB problem. [10:35] Malone bug 348316 in linux "Printer (HWModel Name) May Not Be Connected" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/348316 === asac_ is now known as asac [14:18] hi rtg , could you update karmic to 2.6.29.1 [14:20] Kano: I will continue to follow Linus throughout the -rc series. There is no guarantee that Karmic will even compile until after I upload the first Karmic package. [14:21] so 2.6.30-rc1 next? === pgraner-zzzz is now known as pgraner === Nicke_ is now known as Nicke [18:00] stupid question. I'm at http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git. Which is the official Ubuntu kernel git tree for Jaunty? [18:01] ubuntun-jaunty.git [18:01] one n too much [18:02] hmm, I don't see that on the list of repo's at kernel.ubuntu.com. i'll try going there directly and see what I get. [18:02] so... ubuntu/ubuntu-jaunty.git [18:02] Oh, there it is, yeah, I found it. Thanks!! [18:03] tytso1: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelGitGuide [18:04] Thanks, I'm trying to work https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/330824 [18:04] hi [18:04] Malone bug 330824 in linux "Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28" [Undecided,Confirmed] [18:04] my sound just died 2 days ago (in Jaunty) [18:04] and i've been following all the Debugging documents in the wiki [18:04] but nothing seems to be wron [18:04] wrong [18:05] ubot3: #330824 seems pretty serious. I'm trying to work it, but some help from some canonical kernel devs would be appreciated. [18:05] tytso1: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [18:05] heh [18:05] i've an Intel Corporation 82801H card [18:19] tytso1, Just scanned over the bug. Seems like we would have to get into contact with Ted about his latest comment [18:22] tytso1, Err drad. Seems like its you [18:54] Any USB/kernel expert around? Can you have a look at bug 348316? Seems to be a low-level USB problem. [18:55] Malone bug 348316 in linux "Printer (HWModel Name) May Not Be Connected" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/348316 === fabbione is now known as fabbione-vac [21:08] was anything changed between -9 and -11 to make {u,e}hci_hcd nonmodular? [21:09] have somebody claiming that they are built in [21:09] hence they can't unload the [21:10] grepping .config shows *=y ... [21:32] sladen: yes, it happened for 2.6.28-10.33 [21:32] sladen, I think its built in [21:33] sladen: LP: #296710 is the reference [21:38] * sladen reads [21:39] so now, when a module is misbehaving, how does one now force the drive/blacklist the other [21:44] tdg: when making a module built-in (cf. *_hcd), please (pretty please), could you mention it in the changelog [21:44] dtchen: ta for the bug # [21:44] sladen: i pulled it directly from the changelog [21:46] dtchen: oh. apologies due. I'd been (thought) I'd been through the changelog twice [21:48] ah, I'd grepped for -E (built.in|USB|hcd) ... which cunningly doesn't match === corge is now known as fdd [22:05] Any USB/kernel expert around? Can you have a look at bug 348316? Seems to be a low-level USB problem. [22:05] Malone bug 348316 in linux "Printer (HWModel Name) May Not Be Connected" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/348316 === k-s[AWAY] is now known as k-s === fdd is now known as moroi [23:13] im trying to build a LUM for lpia and its complaining about a missing version.h ....... [23:13] i know i have the linux-headers installed [23:14] im a bit baffled ..... i bet this is a simple one that im forgetting [23:31] A LUM for which distroseries? [23:31] LUM is rolled into the main image packages now [23:33] hardy [23:33] i see the problem now -- there is no /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build symlink === k-s is now known as k-s[AWAY] === k-s[AWAY] is now known as k-s === k-s is now known as k-s[AWAY]