[00:35] <fta> mozilla 406646
[05:29] <sindhudweep1> asac: you awake?
[09:41] <asac> fta: cool
[09:41] <asac> seamonkey tagged stuff
[10:46] <asac> [reed]: you remember the odd chrome:// in the blocklist call URL?
[10:46] <asac> [reed]: so we tried to not use localized pref for language
[10:47] <asac> but now it turns out that ffox with matchOS is kind of broken because of that
[10:47] <asac> e.g. navigator.language is  always en-US
[10:47] <asac> so we need the patch we wont-fixed at some point
[10:48] <asac> now i just have to find the mozilla bug we had for that "statistic" thing again
[10:49] <armin76> bumb!
[10:49] <asac> armin76: we are bumping everyday ;)
[10:50] <asac> armin76: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[11:27] <gnomefreak> asac: fta2 are your gwibbers still crashing?
[11:28] <asac> i dont have it running as it hung yesterday (as you can probably tell from my non-dents ;))
[11:28]  * gnomefreak found out what was causing the URL bar to show progress bar.
[11:29] <gnomefreak> asac: i cant get it to be usable it crashes everytime i try to set it up or when it tries to connect
[11:29]  * gnomefreak downgrading from 1.xxx to 0.9
[11:29] <asac> ok i am running archive version
[11:29] <asac> not sure whats in there
[11:32] <gnomefreak> asac: if you mean ubuntu archives the version is 0.8-0ubuntu3 fta has 0.9 and daily gwibber is 1.*
[11:36] <asac> yeah. i dont run dailies nor fta
[11:37] <gnomefreak> asac: i'm assumiong ubufox only supports i386?
[11:37] <asac> no
[11:37] <asac> supports every arch
[11:38] <gnomefreak> asac: PPA doesnt build anything but 386
[11:38] <gnomefreak> https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive/ppa/+builds?build_text=ubufox&build_state=all
[11:39] <gnomefreak> hmmmm maybe 386 can be used on 64
[11:39] <gnomefreak> and yes its too damn early for thinking. I'm pre coffee
[11:41] <asac> gnomefreak: its arch all ... e.g. it just gets built once and released everywhere
[11:42] <gnomefreak> asac: ah thanks i'll let him know :)
[11:51] <sindhudweep1> asac: ping
[11:52] <asac> please no content-less pings ;)
[11:52] <asac> otherwise i say pong and go to lunch ;)
[11:52] <sindhudweep1> i'm not sure how to add kde4 support to the debian packaging for gnash
[11:53] <sindhudweep1> from my limited understanding it was added to gnash .8.5
[11:53] <asac> sindhudweep1: how about -> #gnash?
[11:53] <asac> i am not sure about the kde4 state atm
[11:53] <asac> this reminds me that i am still waiting for a contribution of 0.8.5
[11:53] <asac> let me do that after lunch on my own
[11:53] <sindhudweep1> well my branch is just a two line change
[11:53] <asac> time is really running low
[11:54] <sindhudweep1> do yo want me to point the merge in the correct place, like timo suggested?
[11:54] <asac> sindhudweep1: thought you said you "are not sure" ... so you have a fix?
[11:54] <sindhudweep1> I have a fix for mozilla and epiphany
[11:54] <sindhudweep1> that works for amd64 and 386
[11:54] <asac> sorry i cant follow :(
[11:54] <asac> mozila/epiphany have nothing to do with kde4
[11:54] <sindhudweep1> uhh well the plugin works on those two browsers
[11:54] <sindhudweep1> right
[11:54] <asac> yeah. thats good
[11:55] <asac> sindhudweep1: so you did the merge?
[11:55] <sindhudweep1> but the gnash source package should build a kde4 plugin too
[11:55] <asac> sindhudweep1: lets first get the plain merge in
[11:55] <asac> if we have time to do the kde4 parts too that would be great. but step by step
[11:55] <sindhudweep1> ahh okay
[11:55] <asac> sindhudweep1: so did you push that somewhere yet?
[11:56] <sindhudweep1> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/trunk
[11:56] <sindhudweep1> 10 days old
[11:56] <asac> let me look
[11:56] <sindhudweep1> sanity check it while i move the request to the right branch
[11:57] <sindhudweep1> from what i could gather kde support was originally remove from the package starting with revision 146
[11:57] <sindhudweep1> *removed
[11:58] <asac> yeah the old kde3 thing was just too borked
[11:58] <sindhudweep1> the debian maintainer for gnash has a .8.5 package in debian unstable
[11:58] <asac> ignore her
[11:58] <sindhudweep1> but it uses ffmpeg instead of gstreamer
[11:58] <sindhudweep1> ahh okay.
[11:59] <asac> sindhudweep1: did you find the revision in the upstream branch?
[11:59] <sindhudweep1> which revision?
[12:00] <asac> the release revision
[12:00] <asac> oh wait they did a branch for that
[12:00] <sindhudweep1> yes
[12:00] <asac> its http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/release_0_8_5/
[12:00] <sindhudweep1> that is what i used bzr-buildpackage against
[12:00] <asac> sindhudweep1: so two things. please uncommit your topmost commit
[12:01] <sindhudweep1> okay i am new to bzr
[12:01] <sindhudweep1> how do i do that?
[12:01] <asac> 1. dont create a new changlog entry; bump the topmost (UNRELEASED)
[12:01] <asac> keep it at unreleased
[12:01] <asac> bzr uncommit
[12:01] <sindhudweep1> ahh okay
[12:01] <asac> add your stuff there
[12:01] <asac> 2. please add a file .bzr-builddeb/default.conf with the following content:
[12:01] <asac> [BUILDDEB]
[12:01] <asac> Merge = True
[12:01] <asac> export-upstream = http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/gnash/release_0_8_5/
[12:02] <asac> after committing that you should be able to just run:
[12:02] <asac> bzr bd
[12:02] <asac> and that will properly create the tarball for you from the upstream branch
[12:02] <asac> (e.g. delete all orig.tar.gz you have locally for testing)
[12:02] <sindhudweep1> okay
[12:02] <asac> 3. remember to use your right email on commit
[12:02] <asac> e.g. the one you have in launchpad
[12:03] <asac> e.g. look how miserable it looks like here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/trunk
[12:03] <asac> ;)
[12:03] <sindhudweep1> haha yes
[12:03] <sindhudweep1> how do i set that? i configured the launchpad-login thing in bzr
[12:03] <asac> i have in .bazaar/bazaar.conf:
[12:03] <asac> [DEFAULT]
[12:03] <asac> email = Alexander Sack <asac@ubuntu.com>
[12:03] <asac> build-dir = /tmp/build
[12:03] <asac> launchpad_username = asac
[12:03] <sindhudweep1> thanks
[12:04] <asac> remove build-dir ;)
[12:04]  * gnomefreak loves my anti-ping script, cant remember who wrote it but i modified it to use pm instead of channel :)
[12:04]  * asac did that now to
[12:04] <asac> gnomefreak: heh. yeah
[12:04] <asac> i prefer to tell that presonally ;)
[12:05] <asac> sindhudweep1:  you think you can do those 3. points swiftly? i would love to look at this merge after lunch ;)
[12:05] <gnomefreak> good point, It gets to be a problem whne you are in 33+ channels
[12:05] <sindhudweep1> yes doing it now
[12:05] <asac> sindhudweep1: great.
[12:05] <sindhudweep1> just have to upload an ssh key from this machine to lp
[12:05] <asac> sindhudweep1: also please use the same format for changelog that we use
[12:06] <asac> e.g. use - update this/file
[12:06] <asac> and so on
[12:06] <sindhudweep1> okay
[12:06] <asac> just  look at the previous changelog entries
[12:06] <sindhudweep1> i will look at other entried
[12:06] <sindhudweep1> yup
[12:06] <asac> sindhudweep1: and keep it at UNRELEASED until the very last thing
[12:06] <asac> for release you usually just do a commit that just flips that to jaunty
[12:06] <asac> like i did in rev 163: [DEFAULT]
[12:06] <asac> email = Alexander Sack <asac@ubuntu.com>
[12:06] <asac> build-dir = /tmp/build
[12:06] <asac> launchpad_username = asac
[12:06] <asac> oops
[12:07] <sindhudweep1> ahh okay i see that now
[12:07] <asac> like i did in rev 163: * RELEASE 0.8.4-0ubuntu1 to ubuntu/intrepid
[12:07] <asac> sindhudweep1: so for that commit just do dch -r
[12:07] <asac> that will update the timestamp and flip to jaunty
[12:08] <asac> ok going for lunch
[12:08] <asac> bb in 1h
[12:20] <gnomefreak> asac: is mozilla 404314 the same as the right click master bug we have?
[12:21] <gnomefreak> our bug that i am talking about is bug 187313
[12:22] <gnomefreak> hmmm mvo disabled upgrades intrepid -> jaunty in update manager
[12:26] <gnomefreak> asac: does bugzilla3 allow us to reply to a comment on upstream bugs? or do i have to set something up to do this?
[12:48] <armin76> fta: asac: a workaround for sparc is using --disable-jit
[12:55] <asac> gnomefreak: not sure.
[12:57] <sindhudweep1> asac: bzr-bd seems to try and get the source from cvs and from a orig.tar.gz and fails. It doesnt seem to be using debian/.bzr-builddeb/default.conf
[12:57] <asac> sindhudweep1: its not in debian/, but on top level
[12:58] <sindhudweep1> ahh okay
[12:58] <sindhudweep1> thanks
[13:01] <sindhudweep1> asac: it has the same behavior after i moved the directory. http://pastebin.com/d2d872390
[13:03] <asac> sindhudweep1: you need to add that to bzr
[13:03] <asac> e.g. bzr add .bzr-builddeb
[13:03] <sindhudweep1> haha
[13:03] <asac> if you dont do that bzr bd will not see that file
[13:03] <gnomefreak> sindhudweep1: that normall happens when the tarball isnt in the dir named tarballs if i understand it right. when trying to build it tries to grab source instead
[13:03] <sindhudweep1> yup
[13:04] <sindhudweep1> thanks, gnomefreak
[13:04] <gnomefreak> np
[13:04] <asac> gnomefreak: we are trying "automated generation of tarballs here" ;)
[13:04] <gnomefreak> ah
[13:04] <sindhudweep1> well still good to know for my future reference
[13:04]  * gnomefreak really really hates mozilla bugs, cant seem to search for bugs you reported that have been closed it seems
[13:05] <sindhudweep1> asac: it claims to have added .bzr-builddeb and the default.conf file in it but i still get the same behavior
[13:07] <asac> sindhudweep1: please commit it and push so i can try
[13:07] <sindhudweep1> okay
[13:10] <gnomefreak> [reed]: asac ok there has to be a  way to search bugs that you filed in bugzilla that have been closed for any reason?' is it possible to do this
[13:17] <asac> gnomefreak: search for you as reporter and allow any state
[13:17] <asac> or just the resolved state
[13:18] <asac> you can do both on the advanced search form
[13:18] <gnomefreak> asac: thanks looking at it
[13:18] <sindhudweep1> lp:~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/gnashpackaging.8.5
[13:19] <asac> sindhudweep1: thanks. remember to mark your other branches as "abandoned" or so ...
[13:19] <sindhudweep1> i deleted it
[13:19] <asac> otherwise they wills tay on the active branch list forever
[13:19] <asac> good
[13:20] <asac> sindhudweep1: works for me ;)
[13:20] <sindhudweep1> haha maybe i havent configured something somewhere.
[13:20] <asac> usually not
[13:20] <asac> sindhudweep1: running jaunty?
[13:20] <sindhudweep1> yes
[13:21] <asac> sindhudweep1: maybe adding wasnt enough, but you needed to commit it
[13:21] <asac> maybe it works for you now?
[13:21] <sindhudweep1> ahh
[13:21] <sindhudweep1> nope
[13:21] <sindhudweep1> but the changes made aren't really too intensive; I figure you're gonna have to redo it anyways
[13:22] <asac> oh shit ;)
[13:22] <gnomefreak> asac: nope its still not finding them
[13:23] <asac> sindhudweep1: you have to remove the whole get-orig-source thing ;)
[13:23] <sindhudweep1> hmm okay
[13:23] <asac> sindhudweep1: its indeed broken
[13:23] <sindhudweep1> how do i uncommit and get lp to merge my changes
[13:24] <asac> sindhudweep1: uncommit +  push --overwrite
[13:24] <sindhudweep1> thanks
[13:25] <asac> sindhudweep1: remove the get-orig-source please for now
[13:25] <sindhudweep1> in build_head? rules?
[13:25] <sindhudweep1> where is that located?
[13:27] <asac> james_w: http://paste.ubuntu.com/143447/
[13:27] <asac> still borked as it seems
[13:27] <asac> sindhudweep1: just rules for now
[13:27] <asac> build_head we have to fix later
[13:29] <asac> james_w: even passing proper --export-upstream-revision= doesnt help
[13:33] <sindhudweep1> asac: i think i've made the necessary changes, still breaks. I've pushed it to lp
[13:34] <asac> sindhudweep1: good.
[13:36] <asac> sindhudweep1: your commit messages are really bad still
[13:36] <asac> you shouldnt merge, but uncommit
[13:36] <asac> sindhudweep1: can you start with trunk again and do a few tiny commits?
[13:36] <sindhudweep1> yes
[13:36] <asac> and keep this UNRELEASED ?
[13:37] <sindhudweep1> yes, sorry
[13:37] <asac> sindhudweep1: no problem ;)
[13:37] <asac> sorry for being picky
[13:37] <asac> ;)
[13:37] <sindhudweep1> no no
[13:37] <asac> sindhudweep1: you can do the - add .bzr-builddeb/default.conf for the "* new upstream release" changelog entry
[13:37] <asac> e.g. do it together with the version bump (thats where it belongs)
[13:37] <sindhudweep1> it must have got in when i did the first uncommit and got errors trying to push back to lp and it complains. know i know the power of overwrite
[13:37] <asac> sindhudweep1: also try to use debcommit (without anything)
[13:37] <sindhudweep1> yup
[13:37] <sindhudweep1> dbecommit?
[13:37] <asac> that will create bzr commit messages from your changelog entries
[13:38] <asac> and auto close bugs in launchpad
[13:38] <sindhudweep1> okay
[13:38] <asac> sindhudweep1: just start from scratch and do the few changes manually again ;)
[13:39] <asac> sindhudweep1: also we should remove the watch
[13:39] <sindhudweep1> watch?
[13:40] <asac> bzr rm debian/watch
[13:40] <asac> do that in a distinct commit
[13:40] <asac> we use bzr for upstream tarballs and not watches
[13:45] <asac> james_w: bug 354472
[13:48] <james_w> what's going on with your watch file?
[13:50] <james_w> asac: and *please* include a reference to the branch you are building in your bug reports
[13:50] <asac> james_w: watch file removed doesnt change a thing
[13:50] <james_w> I realise that, but I wonder what is wrong with it
[13:51] <asac> james_w: i would think that you can run that command in any branch
[13:51] <james_w> if it's another bug then I would like to fix that too
[13:51] <james_w> well, not necessarily
[13:51] <james_w> I don't have any --export-upstream branches to hand, so building yours would be much quicker, and make sure that I am fixing the problem that you are seeing
[13:52] <asac> james_w: --export-upstream branches are not special ... ;)
[13:52] <asac> anyway let me try
[13:55] <asac> sindhudweep1: ready?
[13:55] <sindhudweep1> just a sec
[13:55] <asac> i need a branch so james_w can test ;)
[13:56] <asac> james_w: so another bug: if i run --export-upstream=... then i certainly dont want to run get-orig-source ;)
[13:56] <james_w> well, it wouldn't if this first bug wasn't there
[13:56] <asac> you can test that with any branch that has get-orig-source
[13:56] <asac> james_w: so --export-upstream= is repferred?
[13:56] <asac> good
[13:57] <asac> james_w: then you can really try that with any branch ... just run the command above in it and it will
[13:57] <asac> run get-orig-source ;)
[13:58] <asac> james_w: ok added a brnach to summary bzr branch lp:~gnash/gnash/ubuntu.head
[13:58] <asac> it will run get-orig-source until we removed that (will happen in  a few)
[13:59] <james_w> ok
[13:59] <sindhudweep1> lp:~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/gnashpackaging.8.5-attempt2
[13:59] <james_w> the issue with lp:~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/gnashpackaging.8.5 is that it should be "merge = True", not "Merge = True"
[13:59] <sindhudweep1> oO
[13:59] <sindhudweep1> let em fix that
[14:00] <asac> james_w: urgh
[14:00] <asac> james_w: so no export if not --merge?
[14:00] <james_w> yes
[14:00] <asac> why does it attempt get-orig-source and watch then?
[14:00] <asac> ok untargetted bug
[14:00] <asac> sindhudweep1: yeah fix that syntax ;)
[14:00] <james_w> good question
[14:01] <sindhudweep1> asac: how do i roll back a few commits, make the fix and then move forward again?
[14:01] <james_w> I might change that one way or the other
[14:01] <sindhudweep1> i'd rather not have that fix in the change log with something else...
[14:01] <asac> james_w: bug 354472
[14:01] <james_w> but if you have a non-merge branch then I would seriously recommend you use merge-upstream and not export-upstream
[14:01] <asac> updated
[14:01] <asac> untargetted
[14:01] <james_w> thanks
[14:01] <asac> lowering to medium
[14:02] <asac> sindhudweep1: not possible
[14:02] <asac> sindhudweep1: just fix the syntax error on top
[14:02] <asac> thats ok
[14:02] <sindhudweep1> okay
[14:02] <asac> no need to add changelog entry for just that
[14:03] <asac> james_w: ok. so false alert; sorry for that ;) ... confusion never stops me
[14:03] <james_w> no problem
[14:04] <asac> james_w: also unassigned so random bzr-builddeb-hackers can grab it ;)
[14:04] <james_w> heh
[14:05] <asac> james_w: no that this remote export is running (taking ages) ... i wonder if that should rather be a lightweight checkout for export upstream?
[14:05] <sindhudweep1> asac: changes in lp:~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/gnashpackaging.8.5-attempt2 it seems to grab the upstream now
[14:05] <asac> james_w: or doesnt that give any perf benefit?
[14:06] <asac> sindhudweep1: ok looking
[14:06] <james_w> it shouldn't really
[14:06] <james_w> I don't know the codepaths in detail though
[14:07] <asac> james_w: ok. so the purpose of --lightweight is a bit of a mystery then ;)
[14:07] <asac> except maybe local storage save
[14:07] <james_w> yeah
[14:07] <asac> but that doesnt sound like something folks really care about nowadays ;)
[14:07] <james_w> both just grab the latest revision though, so they should have equivalent performace
[14:08] <james_w> well, it should download less data
[14:08] <james_w> so be quicker than a full branch
[14:08] <asac> james_w: yeah. so it should be faster
[14:08] <sindhudweep1> well that is the wait time involved
[14:08] <asac> james_w: right. thats why i wonder whether --export-upstream should use --lightweight
[14:08] <james_w> um, no
[14:08] <james_w> I just said that export and --lightweight should be equivalent
[14:08] <asac> oh right you need it for merging ;)
[14:09] <james_w> perhaps you have the wrong idea about what it is doing
[14:09] <asac> most likely
[14:09] <asac> so you are using bzr export?
[14:10] <asac> sindhudweep1: ok good. its working here.
[14:11] <asac> sindhudweep1: cool. so debcommit is nice ;)? :)
[14:11] <asac> sindhudweep1: so http://paste.ubuntu.com/143468/ ... and then its fine i guess
[14:11] <asac> (i prefer that with emails)
[14:11] <james_w> asac: essentially, yes
[14:14] <asac> sindhudweep1: welcome to the gnash team ;)
[14:14] <asac> sindhudweep1: feel free to push to the .head branch
[14:14] <asac> i will push that over to the non head branch when uploading
[14:15] <asac> sindhudweep1: do you have a twitter or identi.ca account?
[14:16] <asac> nevermind
[14:16] <asac> sindhudweep1: http://identi.ca/notice/3193288 ;)
[14:20] <gnomefreak> asac: i have bugs 347972 and 272959 ready hey easy ubufox fixes :)
[14:20] <asac> bug 272959
[14:21] <armin76> mozStorageEvents.cpp: In member function 'nsresult AsyncExecuteStatements::BuildAndNotifyResults(sqlite3_stmt*)':
[14:21] <armin76> mozStorageEvents.cpp:454: error: 'PR_ASSERT_CURRENT_THREAD_OWNS_LOCK' was not declared in this scope
[14:21] <armin76> make[4]: *** [mozStorageEvents.o] Error 1
[14:21] <asac> gnomefreak: thanks. we have to fix something else for shiretoko
[14:21] <armin76> hrm...
[14:21] <asac> currently ubufox breaks stuff
[14:22] <asac> armin76: i saw that somewhere ;)
[14:22] <asac> which version?
[14:22] <armin76> trunk
[14:25] <gnomefreak> asac: thats fine those were ones that stood out as easy fixes. i will leave the desciption to you ;)
[14:25] <armin76> oh, i think its related to nspr
[14:25]  * armin76 disables system nss/nspr
[14:27] <asac> gnomefreak: did you request merge for those?
[14:27] <gnomefreak> not yet, where do you want me to request it merged to?
[14:28] <asac> gnomefreak: against ubufox upstream branch for the first bug
[14:28] <asac> and against the packaging branch for the firefox-2 bug
[14:28] <gnomefreak> theres an upstreaam branch?
[14:29] <asac> lp:ubufox
[14:29]  * asac on call
[14:29] <gnomefreak> ah ok that cant be good :( i branched from core-dev branch as it looked like it had everything in it
[14:30] <asac> core-dev is the packaging branch
[14:33] <gnomefreak> would you perfer that i branch upstream branch than merge it?
[14:36] <gnomefreak> upstream branch doesnt have a debian dir that is why i branched from core-dev since changes applied to install.rdf and debian/control
[14:36] <jesse__> hello
[14:36] <jesse__> does anyone know about the mozilla campus rep program?
[14:38] <gnomefreak> jesse__: http://www.spreadfirefox.com/campusreps
[14:38] <gnomefreak> that should give you what you want :)
[14:39] <gnomefreak> ok gwibber is really starting to piss me off. there doesnt seem to be another blogger that uses indenti
[14:39] <jesse__> I signed up a month ago and have not heard anything back.
[14:41] <rZr> hi asac
[14:41] <rZr> so what's up w/ https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/3697
[14:42] <gnomefreak> jesse__: im guessing you emailed campusreps at mozilla dot com to follow up on it?
[14:44] <rZr> asac: oh wait upstream released a new version
[14:44] <gnomefreak> hmmmm i think i have an idea for foxmarks but need to figure it out, name changes and maybe change a few little things to make it under free license oh hell what can i lose :)
[14:44] <gnomefreak> rZr: hes on a call atm
[14:46] <jesse__> no I will do that. thanks gnomefreak!
[14:46] <asac> rZr: ok. do that quick. i will upload in 2-3 hours ;)
[14:46] <gnomefreak> jesse__: np
[14:46] <rZr> asac: k
[14:46]  * gnomefreak not lying i swear he was on a call
[14:47] <rZr> i installed jaunty i can test it
[15:00] <sindhudweep1> asac: thanks and done. I'll be back on monday to work on the other issues with the package.
[15:00] <sindhudweep1> Have a good weekend.
[16:12] <armin76> asac: apply apply!
[16:13] <asac> armin76: file abug ;)
[16:14] <asac> i never get any complains about hppa ;)
[16:14] <asac> nor sparc
[16:17] <gnomefreak> greasemonkey fixed removed firefox-2 and updated for 3.6 in install.rdf now back to finding out what blogger app to use in stead of gwibber (none outright state for use with indenti
[16:18] <armin76> asac: liar, there's a bug for sparc segfaulting!
[16:18] <armin76> or there used to
[16:18] <gnomefreak> any ideas i would greatly apperciate on blogger
[16:21] <asac> armin76: ubuntu bug?
[16:21] <asac> i doubt it ;)
[16:21] <asac> if there was that guy probably gave up ;)
[16:22] <armin76> gah, bus error on trunk
[16:24] <rzr_> gnomefreak: hi john
[16:24] <rzr_> gnomefreak: i just got your emails
[16:24] <rzr_> should i remove firefox-3.0 in depends ?
[16:25] <gnomefreak> rzr_: no leave it there for now. shit thanks for reminding me :(
[16:25] <gnomefreak> i forgot to add them to depends but it still works in 3.5 and 3.6 :)
[16:26] <rzr_> k
[16:26] <rzr_> Depends: ${misc:Depends}, iceweasel | firefox | abrowser | firefox-3.0 | seamonkey-browser | thunderbird | midbrower
[16:26] <rzr_> is this ok then ?
[16:28] <gnomefreak> rzr_: yeah i plan on adding firefox-3.5 to depends since it is in repos in jaunty but i would like to find out what asac thinks
[16:29] <Jazzva> gnomefreak: abrowser-3.5 is in, too
[16:29] <gnomefreak> Jazzva: yeah that is 3.1 renamed
[16:29] <gnomefreak> so 3.5 should be ok as a depends
[16:30] <Jazzva> yep. I just wanted to comment on that, so it doesn't get left behind :).
[16:30] <gnomefreak> rzr_: what extension is that
[16:30] <gnomefreak> Jazzva: :)
[16:30] <gnomefreak> should we add both cant hurt i geuss
[16:30] <gnomefreak> guess
[16:31] <gnomefreak> and abrowser 3.5 as well
[16:31] <Jazzva> yeah, if extension works with 3.5, I think it's ok
[16:32] <rzr_> gnomefreak: flashblock
[16:32] <rzr_> the terrible and infamous flashblock
[16:32] <gnomefreak> rzr_: yeah add arowser and firefox 3.5 and is it supporting tb3.0 yet?
[16:33] <RzR> tb ?
[16:34] <RzR> thunderbird ?
[16:34] <RzR> i dont think so
[16:34] <gnomefreak> Depends: firefox | abrowser | abrowser-3.5 | firefox-3.5 | firefox-3.0, apturl (>= 0.1.2ubuntu1)
[16:34] <gnomefreak> RzR: yeah thunderbird
[16:34] <RzR> no ${misc:Depends} ?
[16:35] <gnomefreak> i dont have it in ubufox
[16:35] <RzR> lintian complain about
[16:35] <gnomefreak> not sure about greasemonkey but i wanted to fix something else in there anyway
[16:35] <RzR> my ppa replied :
[16:35] <RzR> Rejected:
[16:35] <RzR> Could not find person ''
[16:35] <RzR> Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous error.
[16:36] <gnomefreak> i have yet seen something like that it would bother the hell out of me if i did
[16:36] <RzR> something wrong in my pgp configuration
[16:40] <gnomefreak> getting tired of typing in password for bzr
[16:41] <RzR> ssh-add -L || ssh-add
[16:44] <gnomefreak> thanks
[16:44] <gnomefreak> ok fixed my branches for grease.. and ubufox
[16:46] <RzR> is the team in hurry as hell for the release ?
[16:48]  * gnomefreak not so much but i have a few packages waiting for sponsor
[16:49] <asac> RzR: hard freeze is 9th Apr
[16:50] <asac> fta2: do you have a no-password gpg key you use for the dailies?
[16:52] <gnomefreak> ok now everything is fixed with -3.5
[16:56] <asac> gnomefreak: in dailies or archive?
[16:57] <gnomefreak> asac: what comment are you asking about?
[17:02] <asac> 17:52 < gnomefreak> ok now everything is fixed with -3.5
[17:03] <gnomefreak> asac: in the extensions for the remove ff2 from deps and i added 3.5 to them
[17:03] <gnomefreak> im looking for bug atm
[17:03] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 272959
[17:09] <gnomefreak> asac: ignore the ubufox merge im going to use upstream branch
[17:13] <gnomefreak> asac: if i use upstrem it will not contain any changes to debian/control /changelog  using the core-dev branch i can add those changes
[17:13] <asac> gnomefreak: dont bother about the install.rdf bump
[17:13] <asac> i will just do it while i touch that branch now
[17:14] <gnomefreak> asac: oh ok already done here but thats fine
[17:14] <asac> gnomefreak: so do the core-dev changes only
[17:14] <asac> gnomefreak: when i pushed the new upstream snapshot you can merge that to core-dev and finish release
[17:14] <asac> i will let you know
[17:14] <gnomefreak> asac: i did i changed install.rdf control
[17:14] <gnomefreak> asac: ok
[17:15] <gnomefreak> and mozgest is done :)
[17:15] <asac> fta2: so we killed the dom-inspector from all branches?
[17:16] <asac> is that not in the sources anymore or what?
[17:20] <gnomefreak> asac: is there a list of all code-dev branches or atleast updated branches searching in LP isnt helpful
[17:25] <asac> http://hg.mozilla.org/dom-inspector/
[17:25] <BUGabundo> hey everyone
[17:30] <gnomefreak> Jazzva: i just commented on bug 184882 for you. sure you already knew it but what the hell :)
[17:32] <gnomefreak> asac: wasnt dom always been packaged as an extension?
[17:34] <gnomefreak> ok done with extensions for today. i still need to figure out what to use in place of gwibber
[17:35] <asac> gnomefreak: it was built from the main tree
[17:35] <gnomefreak> asac: oh
[17:38] <asac> hah. it works ;)
[17:38]  * asac talks to himself
[17:38] <gnomefreak> looks like release of 1.1.16 is happening around time 3.0.9 is released
[17:38] <gnomefreak> what works?
[17:40] <asac> building dom-inspector ;)
[17:40] <gnomefreak> ah
[17:41] <gnomefreak> ill be back later its time for lunch and house work :(
[18:07] <RzR> asac: ok flashblock tested about to push
[18:14] <asac> armin76: gnash fails on hppa and sparc
[18:14] <asac> your turn
[18:14] <BUGabundo> asac: Bug 353957
[18:15] <BUGabundo> isn't it just a text file?
[18:15] <BUGabundo> maybe I could make my own 1st pathc
[18:15] <asac> yes xml
[18:16] <asac> BUGabundo: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/downloads/latest/6622
[18:16] <asac> oops
[18:16] <asac> lp:~network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info.ubuntu
[18:17] <asac> fix it and propose a merge
[18:17] <BUGabundo> yeah
[18:17] <BUGabundo> that was what I was thinking of doing it
[18:17] <BUGabundo> but wouldn't it need a ffe?
[18:17] <BUGabundo> or is it just bug fix?
[18:17] <BUGabundo> I saw several others like mine, on LP, when I reported it
[18:17]  * BUGabundo tries to remember how to branch
[18:18] <BUGabundo> $ bzr branch
[18:19] <asac> you will figure
[18:19] <asac> learning NEW stuff (on your own) is good for the overall brain capabilities ;)
[18:19] <asac> i am out now ;)
[18:19] <asac> bzr help gives you comamnds ;)
[18:20] <BUGabundo> I already have it
[18:20] <asac> well. you also need to commit and push for proposing the fix ;)
[18:22] <BUGabundo> I know that too
[18:22] <BUGabundo> just ,never did a push to lp
[18:22] <BUGabundo> will try latter
[18:22] <BUGabundo> talk to you if I see you here
[18:23] <RzR> asac: ok pushed , please double check about last commit, i did like we decided last time
[18:26] <RzR> waitcouple of  minutes if possible
[18:37] <RzR> asac: get-orig-version doest work on new naming scheme
[18:37] <RzR> i am fixing this
[18:51] <RzR> asac: ok should be ready
[18:51] <RzR> now
[18:52] <RzR> i have to go
[18:52] <RzR> i'll be back this night if needed on tomorow
[19:10] <BUGabundo> asac: ping
[19:10] <BUGabundo> are you back?
[19:10] <BUGabundo> need help debuging hal or udev for an 3G dongle
[19:41] <armin76> asac: current trunk will be broken on sparc until sqlite3 is fixed, unaligned stuff, again :)
[20:13] <RzR> asac: your turn to play , i'll be back
[22:28] <BUGabundo> asac: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bugabundo/network-manager/bug353957/+merge/5210
[22:28] <BUGabundo> yay
[22:28] <BUGabundo> 1st patch done!