[00:34] <BUGabundo> hey some one help here
[00:34] <BUGabundo> $ bzr push lp:~bugabundo/network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info
[00:34] <BUGabundo> bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: "/~bugabundo/network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info": : Cannot create branch at '/~bugabundo/network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info'
[00:34] <BUGabundo> what am I doing wrong?
[00:35] <jkakar> BUGabundo: Take out the last "/mobile-broadband-provider-info".
[00:35] <jkakar> BUGabundo: The format is lp:~<username>/<project>/<branch name>
[00:35] <BUGabundo> Iahh
[00:35] <BUGabundo> yay
[00:35] <BUGabundo> works
[00:36] <jkakar> :)
[00:36] <BUGabundo> thanks jkakar
[00:36] <jkakar> BUGabundo: My pleasure.
[00:36] <BUGabundo> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bugabundo/network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/+register-merge
[00:36] <BUGabundo> now I need to request a merge to the correct place
[00:37] <BUGabundo> I tried it earlier, but asac said I used the wrong place
[00:37] <BUGabundo> it seems, that following LP suggestion it try to merge it to NM and not MBPI
[00:38] <BUGabundo> and searching for it, only returns my branch
[00:39] <wgrant> BUGabundo: I think your branch is in the wrong project...
[00:39] <wgrant> You probably want mobile-broadband-provider-info, not network-manager.
[00:39] <BUGabundo> yes
[00:40] <BUGabundo> I branched mbpi
[00:40] <wgrant> And put it in network-manager..?
[00:40] <BUGabundo> at least I think I did
[00:40] <BUGabundo> I don't know
[00:40] <BUGabundo> 1st time here...
[00:40] <wgrant> You branched from the right place.
[00:40] <wgrant> But you pushed to the wrong URL.
[00:40] <BUGabundo> ok
[00:40] <wgrant> Hit the edit button on your branch.
[00:40] <BUGabundo> I pushed it to the address asac and jkakar gave me
[00:40] <wgrant> And reassign it to the right project.
[00:41] <wgrant> No you didn't.
[00:41] <wgrant> You pushed it to an address that they wouldn't have given to you, because it didn't work.
[00:41] <BUGabundo> ok fixed https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bugabundo/network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/+edit
[00:41] <BUGabundo> now the proj says mbpi
[00:42] <wgrant> Now try merging.
[00:43] <BUGabundo> it seems to work
[00:43] <BUGabundo> how is reviewer?
[00:43] <BUGabundo> do I leave networkmanager?
[00:43] <wgrant> That I can't tell you.
[00:43] <wgrant> It depends on the project.
[00:43] <BUGabundo> this is what I pushed $ bzr push lp:~bugabundo/network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info
[00:44] <BUGabundo> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bugabundo/mobile-broadband-provider-info/mobile-broadband-provider-info/+merge/5213
[00:44] <BUGabundo> hope its okay now
[00:44] <wgrant> I would have named the branch differently, but that's not bad.
[00:44] <BUGabundo> (12:27:04 AM) asac: it should have been: ~network-manager/mobile-broadband-provider-info/...
[00:45] <wgrant> He means ~bugabundo, not ~network-manager.
[00:45] <wgrant> You can't write to ~network-manager.
[00:45] <BUGabundo> ahh
[00:45] <BUGabundo> guess that's what I got confused
[00:45] <BUGabundo> thanks for the help
[00:46] <BUGabundo> ok now to give it a better name
[00:46] <wgrant> Something indicative of the changes it contains.
[00:46] <wgrant> bug-XXXXXX, for example.
[00:47] <wgrant> Or bug-XXXXXX-foo-the-bar
[00:47] <BUGabundo> name : fix312376-353957-280490
[00:47] <BUGabundo> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bugabundo/mobile-broadband-provider-info/bug-312376-353957-280490
[00:47] <BUGabundo> done
[00:47] <BUGabundo> thanks once again
[00:48] <wgrant> np
[00:48] <BUGabundo> if it goes ok, it will be my first code contribution
[00:53] <mrooney> I created a release from a milestone, but now I seem stuck with the milestone description shoved BEFORE my release description, and unformatted even! Is there a way to...fix this?
[00:55] <beuno> mrooney, filing a bug
[00:55] <beuno> I will chase it down on monday
[00:56] <wgrant> I don't particularly like the way the milestone<->release merging was landed half-baked, with a pretty confusing UI remaining.
[01:02] <mrooney> it seems very neat in theory, though it took me a solid 5 minutes to find the release button in the milestone
[01:02] <mrooney> I kept looking in the series
[01:03] <mrooney> beuno: just file it against launchpad?
[01:03] <mrooney> wgrant: yeah, now I have to modify my milestone to merge correctly with the release since I need to release before monday
[01:04] <mrooney> and then save that somewhere to put back as the milestone description once it is fixed
[01:07] <wgrant> Am I the only one to be finding LP *really* *really* slow today?
[01:08] <wgrant> My routing to there is utterly broken today (via US, then Germany, then London), but 350ms latency shouldn't make it as slow as it is now.
[01:09] <wgrant> mrooney: bug #340934 is about the difficulty of registering a release.
[01:09] <mrooney> wgrant: ah thanks!
[01:18] <mrooney> beuno: okay, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/354863 , thanks for any help on it!
[02:19] <luke-jr> are projects required to have development focus?
[02:20] <beuno> luke-jr, no, but it's convenient
[02:21] <beuno> now, it's also convenient that I stop working
[02:21]  * beuno -> off
[02:36] <luke-jr> err
[02:36] <luke-jr> ok, so how can I tell LP i don't have one? ☺
[02:40] <rockstar> luke-jr, what would be your use case for having no focus of development?
[02:40] <luke-jr> rockstar: everyone has their own private codebase
[02:41] <rockstar> luke-jr, please tell me someone actually releases the software.
[02:41] <luke-jr> yes, a few branches do ☺
[02:42] <luke-jr> but they're in competition, so preference cannot be given
[02:42] <rockstar> luke-jr, so you have a few different serieses then.
[02:42] <rockstar> So don't set a development focus, but create a few different serieses.
[02:42] <luke-jr> I did
[02:42] <luke-jr> but the Code page is bugging me about it
[02:42] <luke-jr> A development focus branch hasn't been specified, set it now.
[04:51] <nhandler> What date format do the polls on Launchpad use?
[04:51] <vagrantc> greetings folks. i used to go to: es, 138 normal]
[04:51] <vagrantc> 20:38 -!- Home page for #launchpad: https://launchpad.net
[04:51] <vagrantc> gah.
[04:52] <vagrantc> greetings folks. i used to go to: https://code.launchpad.net/~vagrantc/ to find all the bzr branches i was interested in, and it would show me them all. now it only shows me owned branches. i can click on registered, or subscribed, ... but i really miss having them all in one view ... how do you get that?
[04:54] <wgrant> nhandler: Probably YYYY-MM-DD
[04:54] <wgrant> I thought it said.
[04:54] <wgrant> Apparently not.
[04:56] <wgrant> nhandler: Bug #176943
[04:56] <wgrant> But the format described there is wrong.
[04:57] <wgrant> Actually, it accepts MM-DD-YYYY or YYYY-MM-DD
[05:02] <nhandler> wgrant: It says Date and Time
[05:10] <wgrant> nhandler: HH:MM:SS.SSSS..., I supose
[05:10] <wgrant> Try it on staging.
[05:17] <nhandler> Thanks wgrant. It looks like it worked.
[05:29] <wgrant> cprov: I see there's no longer a way to look at all of the versions of a DSP
[11:31] <c_korn> hello, get the additional PPAs I create also GPG signed?
[11:37] <c_korn> ah, yes
[13:31] <magcius> Is there a way to close a Launchpad bug through bzr from the commit message?
[13:34] <kiko> magcius, not sure, let me check
[13:48] <LarstiQ> magcius: from the bzr side, use commit --fixes, don't know what Launchpad does to handle that.
[13:48] <magcius> LarstiQ, I'm using DVC for emacs, and I don't think it has capabilities to support that.
[13:50] <wgrant> That will link the bug and branch, but won't actually close the bug (it's a difficult thing to work out in which circumstances it should be closed, but I hear it's being worked on)
[13:51] <foolano> hi guys, one quick question. Is there any way to take a look to the stats of downloaded packages from a PPA? It'd be great for those who use them as "official" repostirories for our projects to see what packages are more popular and so on
[13:52] <magcius> wgrant, oh whoops, I meant set as resolved.
[13:52] <wgrant> magcius: resolved == closed
[13:52] <magcius> wgrant, I thought Fix Committed was a resolution.
[13:53] <wgrant> It's not a final state.
[13:53] <wgrant> But it is the right state for this, you're right.
[13:53] <wgrant> (Fix Committed once it's in trunk, Fix Released once it's in a release)
[13:54] <LarstiQ> or Fix Committed when it is in a public branch, Fix Released when it's in trunk
[13:54] <magcius> I was wondering about a commit message because DVC only has mechanisms for a commit message.
[13:54] <wgrant> That doesn't make sense, I don't think.
[13:55] <wgrant> magcius: Hm? What about the commit message?
[13:55] <magcius> wgrant, is there a way to set status from a commit message?
[13:55] <wgrant> magcius: No, overloading commit messages with metadata is a bad idea.
[13:55] <wgrant> magcius: bzr supports a special revision property which specified bugs closed.
[13:56] <LarstiQ> wgrant: it does, in the absence of Fix Merged
[13:56] <wgrant> LarstiQ: But the fix is not committed in that project just because Joe Random's branch has the fix.
[13:56] <magcius> Hmmph.
[13:58] <wgrant> The correct solution was to link a branch with the status set to Fix Availab.e
[13:58] <wgrant> But that was removed - presumably it was replaced with merge proposals.
[14:00] <LarstiQ> wgrant: Bazaar's bug workflow predates all that. When there is a revision available that fixes the bug, it's Fix Committed to us.
[14:00] <wgrant> LarstiQ: Interesting... but bzr uses Bundle Buggy, doesn't it?
[14:01] <LarstiQ> wgrant: for keeping track of what still needs to be reviewed/sent to pqm, yes
[14:01] <wgrant> LarstiQ: I mean, it's not fully doing things the Launchpad Way®.
[14:01] <LarstiQ> wgrant: true.
[14:02] <magcius> Wait, is PQM deployed on Launchpad?
[14:03] <LarstiQ> magcius: nope.
[14:03] <LarstiQ> magcius: you can combine tarmac with launchpad though.
[14:03] <magcius> So where is PQM used?
[14:04] <wgrant> Most of Canonical's projects seem to use it.
[14:04] <LarstiQ> as well as some none-Canonical projects.
[14:05] <magcius> Mind explaining what a few of these things are?
[14:05] <magcius> They seem to overlap a bit.
[14:05] <LarstiQ> magcius: that's right
[14:06] <LarstiQ> magcius: the Bazaar project has been using Bundle Buggy (http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/) and PQM long before similar features in Launchpad became available.
[14:07] <LarstiQ> magcius: PQM acts as an auomated gatekeeper, http://bazaar-vcs.org/Workflows
[14:09] <magcius> Okay.
[14:10] <LarstiQ> magcius: do you have specific questions?
[14:10]  * LarstiQ isn't entirely awake yet
[14:10] <magcius> You mentioned Tarmac... that looks like PQM + Bundle Buggy
[14:13] <LarstiQ> magcius: that's the gist of it. A pro is that it integrates more with Launchpad. A con is that it integrates more with Launchpad :)
[14:13] <LarstiQ> and well, PQM is a bit hard to set up
[14:13] <wgrant> Just a bit.
[14:14] <magcius> Is bzr still using BB + PQM or have they moved over to LP.
[14:14] <LarstiQ> magcius: still using BB + PQM
[14:14] <LarstiQ> use LP for bugs and code hosting
[15:13] <mdke> can anyone tell me the best way to resolve this error with bzr/lp - http://paste.ubuntu.com/144195/
[15:14] <mdke> do I need to upgrade my local repository?
[15:14]  * mdke tries that anyway
[15:15] <mdke> ok, that broke
[15:19]  * LarstiQ looks
[15:20] <LarstiQ> mdke: is the lp one rich-root, or the local one?
[15:21] <mdke> LarstiQ: I thought they both were
[15:22] <mdke> apparently not
[15:22] <mdke> I think the lp one is not
[15:22] <mdke> anyway, I broke my local repository so I've deleted it and checked it out again
[15:22] <mdke> that has fixed it
[15:23] <LarstiQ> right
[15:23] <LarstiQ>     repository: Packs containing knits without subtree support
[15:23] <LarstiQ> is what `bzr info lp:~mdke/ubuntu-doc/help.ubuntu.com/ -v` told me
[15:43] <j1mc> hello, i made a mistake in registering a new series.  can someone assist me?
[15:43] <j1mc> the mistake should be clear if you go here: https://code.launchpad.net/xubuntu-docs
[15:44] <j1mc> both karmic and jaunty are linked to the same branch
[15:56] <j1mc> nm, i figured it out. :)
[18:18] <speakman> Why is the "registered bugtrackers" a dropdown list instead of a text field for urls?
[18:22] <jpds> Because the bugtracker at the URL may not be supported?
[18:25] <speakman> oh, it integrates in some way?
[18:26] <speakman> It's not a bad idea to make an optional text-field for an url which then gets linked to on the "Bugs"-button in LP :)
[18:38] <kwah> hi all
[18:38] <kwah> is this a place to ask questions about PPA?
[18:45] <kwah> don't mind, found an answer, RTFM and Google rule! :D
[18:56] <kwah> nipe
[18:56] <kwah> nope
[18:57] <kwah> still need help
[18:57] <kwah> its about PPA for binary only distribution
[18:57] <LarstiQ> kwah: what is your question?
[18:57] <kwah> there is GIS software
[18:58] <kwah> it is Free like in beer
[18:58] <kwah> but should be distributed without any modifocations
[18:58] <kwah> I want through https://help.launchpad.net/PPATermsofUse
[18:59] <kwah> and it seems that it is like "restricted" component of ubuntu
[19:00] <kwah> but it restricts use of SW were one can get benefit
[19:01] <kwah> So, I made a conclusion that there is no chance to get it into PPA
[19:01] <kwah> am I right?
[19:03] <LarstiQ> kwah: you'll have to ask Canonical to be sure
[19:04] <kwah> I am already pretty sure... There is "Thus we will not distribute software that is licensed "freely for non-commercial use"." clause which is true for this SW
[19:05] <kwah> Door is closed.
[19:06] <LarstiQ> ok
[21:17] <magcius> Hmm... for some reason bzr commit --fixes lp:BUGID isn't working.
[21:19] <james_w> magcius: causing a bzr crash, or not linking the branch to the bug?
[21:19] <magcius> It's the main branch on the project (trunk)... does it still have to be linked?
[21:20] <Snova> Is it possible to delete a project?
[21:21] <james_w> Snova: file a question at http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad to request it
[21:21] <james_w> magcius: yeah, it should still be linked I think
[21:21] <Snova> james_w: I take it you can't, then? Oh well.
[21:21] <Snova> *without asking
[21:22] <james_w> well, I don't have the power anyway
[21:22] <james_w> doing it in response to someone asking on IRC isn't very safe
[21:23] <james_w> and letting someone just delete a project might not be a good idea, because not everyone in the project might agree
[21:23] <Snova> No, I was just considering creating a project for a little thing of mine... but I figure it won't last too long, so...
[21:24] <nhandler> Snova: The LP admins are usually pretty good about responding to deletion requests on LP answers
[21:24] <Snova> Alright.
[22:17] <Ienorand> So lp is down?
[22:36] <AnMaster_ipv6> is lp down?
[22:36] <rconan> anyone else having problems with launchpad?
[22:36] <AnMaster_ipv6> yes
[22:36] <AnMaster_ipv6> I just asked same
[22:36] <rconan> good
[22:37] <AnMaster_ipv6> pushing works
[22:37] <rconan> not just me then
[22:37] <Ienorand> Seems so
[22:37] <Agafonov> LP is defenetely out of order and said me to let you know
[22:38] <Agafonov> beuno: ?
[22:39] <AnMaster_ipv6> anyone know how how long this will take? or why it happened
[22:46] <bencrisford> anyone know why i cant connect to the site?
[22:46] <bencrisford> or is it just me?
[22:46] <cavedon> hi, all
[22:46] <cavedon> page https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wengophone/+question/66496 is not loading
[22:46] <cavedon> and keeps asking me to tell you on ICR :)
[22:46] <cavedon> IRC
[22:47] <Ienorand> lp is down yes, and no no one currently here seems to know why (no "officials" around I guess )
[22:47] <cavedon> Ienorand: ic, thanks
[22:48] <bencrisford> I guess that answers me also ;)
[22:48] <gmb> Ienorand: I'm an "official." Escalating this now.
[22:49] <Ienorand> Hallelujah, our prayers have been heard...
[22:50] <gmb> Ienorand: If I'm the answer to your prayers, you'd better rexamine your religion ;)
[22:50] <Ienorand> I'm an atheist, anyone helping me out is my lord :)
[22:51] <gmb> Ienorand: Thee and me both. Anyway, trying to find a sysadmin now...
[22:52] <slangasek> bugs.lp.net is down?
[22:52] <Ienorand> slangasek: Yes, being examined.
[22:54] <slangasek> ok, good :)
[23:10] <hypnose-kroete> hi
[23:10] <bencrisford> hi
[23:11] <gmb> Quick update on the LP being down situation: I'm in the process of getting hold of a sysadmin.
[23:12] <hypnose-kroete> I get a faulire massage at "https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/50651/+viewstatus", therefore i should tell it to you on this irc channel
[23:12] <jpds> hypnose-kroete: It's known, see /topic
[23:12] <gmb> Yes, thanks ubottu. You're as unhelpful as ever.
[23:13] <hypnose-kroete> oh, ko
[23:14] <testcees> Try reloading this page in a minute or two. If the problem persists, let us know in the #launchpad IRC channel on Freenode.
[23:15] <jpds> testcees: Please see /topic
[23:15] <testcees> ty
[23:19] <hypnose-kroete> ok, ciao all
[23:27] <kiko> I hate saturdays
[23:28] <Ienorand> kiko: sundays are worse
[23:28]  * jpds hugs kiko - not the end of the world.
[23:31] <kiko> hmph
[23:39] <rryan> Launchpad is down?
[23:39] <rUoK5> yes, it's in the topic
[23:39] <Mr_Grieves|> rryan -- see topic
[23:39]  * pcardune looks at topic :)
[23:39] <rryan> :) sorry
[23:41] <Mr_Grieves|> While waiting for launchpad to come back up, is there a way to tell apt to install a specific version of a package, ignoring dependencies?
[23:41] <Mr_Grieves|> I know about dpkg --force-downgrade, but is there a way to tell it to fetch, too?
[23:42] <Snova> I think the syntax is "apt-get install package=version", but I don't know what format "version" is supposed to be.
[23:42] <Snova> Also, dpkg can't download.
[23:43] <Mr_Grieves|> Snova: I've tried that, but then it wants to uninstall everything before it downgrades
[23:43] <Mr_Grieves|> This is libc6 I want to downgrades so everything depends on it :)
[23:44] <Snova> Oh dear... why?
[23:44] <UGe> I guess to ignore dependencies you need to use dpkg with some force option
[23:44] <Mr_Grieves|> Because I'm an idiot :) I added a bad repo and it upgraded libc6 (along with a few hundred other packages...) to faulty versions.
[23:45] <Snova> Oh dear... I don't think downgrading anything is generally easy.
[23:46] <UGe> does not sound like you should do that if you have to ask here :) (nothing personal, just general experience, I wouldn't do it either)
[23:46] <Mr_Grieves|> UGe: the --force-downgrade option works, but I don't have the package.
[23:47] <UGe> which package?
[23:47] <Mr_Grieves|> UGe -- I understand :) I've been doing this all morning by grabbing the packages from launchpad, but now its broken
[23:47] <joey> >> LP is back
[23:47] <Mr_Grieves|> libc6=2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9
[23:48] <Mr_Grieves|> Yay!
[23:48] <dtchen> joey: thanks
[23:48] <Ursinha> :)
[23:48] <rUoK5> yay
[23:48] <Ampelbein> Mr_Grieves|: you could always use ftp://uk.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jaunty/
[23:48] <joey> dtchen, I didn't do it but on behalf of the sysadmin team.. you're welcome and sorry for the interruption
[23:48] <joey> :-)
[23:48] <Ampelbein> (or a mirror thats nearer to you)
[23:49] <hyperair> is there something wrong with launchpad?
[23:49] <hyperair> Please try again
[23:49] <hyperair> Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server.
[23:49] <hyperair> Try reloading this page in a minute or two. If the problem persists, let us know in the #launchpad IRC channel on Freenode.
[23:49] <gmb> hyperair: See /topic
[23:49] <dtchen> hyperair: try again, seems to work now
[23:49] <gmb> Yeah, should be coming back up now.
[23:49] <hyperair> hmm yeah it does
[23:50] <hyperair> gmb: i don't see anything of interest in /topic by the way
[23:50] <gmb> Damn, Ursinha beat me to it.
[23:50] <gmb> hyperair: It *did* say "Launchpad is down, we're working on it.
[23:50] <gmb> Honest.
[23:50] <Ursinha> he did
[23:51] <Ursinha> I just ripped that off
[23:51] <Ursinha> because LP is up again
[23:51] <Ursinha> :)
[23:52] <hyperair> hahaha =p
[23:53] <BobbyMcGee10> Hello, I'm wondering if Launchpad is down for anyone else q GA
[23:53] <Mr_Grieves|> :)
[23:53] <BobbyMcGee10> Oops, sorry, just saw that. Will try again. Thx GA
[23:53] <Ursinha> :)
[23:55] <BobbyMcGee10> launchpad is still down for me GA
[23:57] <arcfi> BobbyMcGee10, i've had problems 10 min ago, now it's looks ok
[23:58] <BobbyMcGee10> *refreshes* finally! it comes up. :) SKSK
[23:58] <BobbyMcGee10> quit