[00:02] <rconan> hmm... seems to be back up
[00:03] <rconan> oh... just saw topic
[00:08] <hyperair> email thing's still down
[00:08] <hyperair> An error occurred while processing a mail you sent to Launchpad's email
[00:08] <hyperair> interface.
[00:09] <joey> hmm let me look at it hyperair
[00:10] <hyperair> joey: alright, thanks
[00:13] <joey> hyperair, it looks like the process is up and running again. You might retry it and let me know
[00:14] <joey> hyperair, actually
[00:14] <joey> hyperair, your email errored
[00:14] <joey> Signature couldn%27t be verified: (7, 9, %27No public key%27)
[00:15] <joey> hyperair, see https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface  for a refresher
[00:17] <hyperair> joey: no public key? all my mails are signed.
[00:17] <hyperair> joey: and i only have one pair of keys.
[00:17] <joey> Error message=Invalid signature for Chow Loong Jin %3Chyperair@gmail.com%3E:%0A    Signature couldn%27t be verified: (7, 9, %27No public key%27)
[00:18] <hyperair> what's that supposed to mean?
[00:18] <hyperair> it can't find my public key?
[00:18] <hyperair> i've been using the email interface for ages
[00:18] <joey> looks that way
[00:18] <hyperair> it started failing now.
[00:19] <hyperair> https://launchpad.net/~hyperair <-- look at that. the ID.
[00:19] <joey> you could retry it again to see if you just got caught in between server restarts
[00:19] <hyperair> hmm okay
[00:19] <joey> hmm yeah, that looks good
[00:20] <hyperair> hmm it worked this tiem then?
[00:21]  * hyperair still doesn't see a reply on the bug =\
[00:21] <joey> let me know if you get an error or it doesn't update
[00:21] <hyperair> joey: also you might like to fix the email it sends back upon failure.. it gives me a blank error message.
[00:21] <joey> hmmm... could you bug that for me against "launchpad"
[00:22] <hyperair> alright
[00:22] <joey> thanks.
[00:22] <joey> We were all out and about when this happened (we don't work on the weekends).  I was in a sporting goods store here in Colorado with the family
[00:23] <joey> The gang will triage that on Monday morning and get it to the right team to fix
[00:23] <joey> We had a nice break in the blizzard here so I thought I'd get out while I could
[00:28] <hyperair> joey: okay awesome. it's working now, thanks =)
[00:28] <joey> hyperair, great! I suspect it was because we had some other components come back online after the main LP site was restored. Probably was affected by that
[00:29] <hyperair> joey: ah i see. that sounds likely.
[00:29] <hyperair> joey: but the blank message on the other hand, probably wasn't caused by that ;)
[00:29] <hyperair> anyway it's daybreak and i should head to bed now
[00:29] <joey> er no, I don't think so
[00:29] <joey> the msg that is
[00:29] <joey> :-)
[00:29] <hyperair> =)
[00:29] <joey> Go to sleep you vampire!
[00:30] <hyperair> hahaha
[00:55] <CarlFK> is there a way to report a bug against a line of code
[00:56] <CarlFK> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mdipierro/web2conf/devel/annotate/head%3A/INSTALL#L14
[00:56] <CarlFK> "#  Don't need dabo for deployment / server" is incorrect.
[01:49] <vadi2> Hi. I put a backported package into my ppa, and made the build-depends and depends field depend on the version >= in the ppa. But launchpad, when building, is not linking to my package in ppa but ubuntus. how can I rectify this?
[01:56] <ausimage> I have a question about openId service...
[01:56] <ausimage> my plugin is asking for additional information and yet launchpad is not returning it
[01:56] <ausimage> https://login.launchpad.net/+openid?openid.return_to=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.newyork-ubuntu.com%2FMain%2FHomePage%3Faction%3Dedit&openid.mode=checkid_setup&openid.identity=https%3A%2F%2Flogin.launchpad.net%2F%2Bid%2FBwLPRme&openid.trust_root=http%3A%2F%2Fbeta.newyork-ubuntu.com&openid.sreg.required=fullname&
[01:57] <ausimage> any ideas why not?
[02:01] <savvas> ausimage: it worked for me
[02:02] <savvas> the link for openid in my case is http://launchpad.net/~medigeek
[02:02] <ausimage> well yeah... but I want the full name back
[02:02] <savvas> oh :)
[02:02] <ausimage> yeah... I got the thing to authorize... but I can't get anything but my url
[02:03] <ausimage> openid.sreg.required=fullname <== that is supposed to return fullname ????
[02:04] <ausimage> or did the spec change?
[02:05] <ausimage> savvas?
[02:05] <ausimage> or who is the openId architect ?
[02:05] <savvas> no idea :\
[02:06] <savvas> I'm just a simple user :)
[02:06] <ausimage> ahhh
[02:06] <savvas> I found this bug though: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+bug/121533
[02:06] <ausimage> like me :)
[02:06] <ausimage> so it is borked?
[02:06] <savvas> from the looks of that bug and some of the comments for fullname, your site must be whitelisted (?)
[02:07] <ausimage> oooh... how does whitelisting work then?
[02:07] <wgrant> ausimage: savvas is correct - you have to get the RP URL whitelisted.
[02:08] <ausimage> *.newyork-ubuntu.com is the New York State Ubuntu Community... so I think it should be
[02:08] <wgrant> ausimage: Ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[02:08] <ausimage> K
[02:12] <ausimage> thanks question asked...
[02:15] <savvas> wgrant: would you happen to know about vadi2 's problem?
[02:19] <savvas> I mean.. is one allowed to depend on packages from their own ppa?
[02:21] <Snova> https://staging.launchpad.net/ seems to still be down...
[02:35] <wgrant> vadi2: The package will only be available after the next */20 after it is built.
[02:35] <wgrant> After that you can build-depend on it.
[02:35] <vadi2> Ah. So if I rebuild, it should work?
[02:35] <wgrant> Yes.
[02:37] <wgrant> Can you point me at the log, though?
[02:38] <wgrant> Did it depwait, or actually fail?
[02:38] <vadi2> it built against ubuntus version
[02:38] <vadi2> and fails to run on the users machine, because apt properly pulled in my updated library
[02:39] <wgrant> Do you still have a link to the old build log? (probably in an email)
[02:39] <vadi2> https://launchpad.net/~mudlet-makers/+archive/ppa is the ppa in question - I've just sent it for rebuilding
[02:39] <vadi2> ok moment
[02:41] <vadi2> Eh
[02:41] <vadi2> What should I search by? I can only find accepted and failed builds
[02:42] <wgrant> What was the status of it? Dependency wait?
[02:42] <wgrant> Wait.
[02:42] <wgrant> No.
[02:42] <wgrant> Hmm.
[02:42] <wgrant> You won't have got an email, as it succeeded.
[02:42] <vadi2> No it built the package fine
[02:42] <vadi2> It just linked against the libqscintilla that is in ubuntu intrepid
[02:42] <wgrant> So it's not easy to find the build log.
[02:42] <vadi2> and which is horribly broken and unusable (a widget editor that crashes on a newline). So I backported it in my ppa for intrepid
[02:43] <wgrant> Can you point me at the URL to the build?
[02:44] <vadi2> https://launchpad.net/~mudlet-makers/+archive/ppa/+build/923914/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.mudlet_0.2~beta8~ppa3_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz ?
[02:44] <wgrant> I presumed you actually retried the build, which would have destroyed the log. However, since it failed, you can't have actually retried it.
[02:44] <wgrant> s/failed/succeeded/
[02:44] <vadi2> Well the logs are here: https://launchpad.net/~mudlet-makers/+archive/ppa/+builds?build_text=&build_state=built
[02:44] <wgrant> I don't see a versioned build-dependency there.
[02:45] <vadi2> I put it in control though
[02:45] <vadi2> maybe i got the syntax wrong, hm
[02:45]  * wgrant looks.
[02:46] <vadi2> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7),
[02:46] <vadi2>  libqscintilla2-dev (>= 2.3.2), lua5.1,
[02:46] <vadi2>  liblua5.1-0-dev, qt4-dev-tools,
[02:46] <vadi2>  libqt4-dev, cmake, libpcre3-dev
[02:46] <vadi2> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libqscintilla2-3 (>= 2.3.2)
[02:47] <wgrant> ~ppa4 didn't have the versioned build-depend.
[02:48] <vadi2> no that is ages old
[02:48] <vadi2> I'm on like ppa9 now
[02:48] <wgrant> ~ppa8 from your PPA, then?
[02:48] <wgrant> (you pointed me at the log for ~ppa3...)
[02:48] <vadi2> oh. sorry
[02:49] <vadi2> yes ppa8 works too
[02:49] <vadi2> because I then copied it to mudlet ppa. now ppa9 is just a rebuild, no changed
[02:49] <vadi2> *changes
[02:49] <wgrant> ~ppa8 built with the new one.
[02:49] <wgrant> Which one didn't?
[02:50] <vadi2> Are you sure? It tries to load 2.so.3
[02:50] <vadi2> qscintilla in my ppa is 2.so.5
[02:50] <wgrant> Unpacking libqscintilla2-3 (from .../libqscintilla2-3_2.3.2-0ubuntu2~mudlet-ppa2_i386.deb) ...
[02:51] <vadi2> Would you mind installing and giving a try? I'm positive I installed from my ppa and it didn't work.
[02:51] <wgrant> The builds for all three archs of ~ppa8 used libqscintilla2-3 from the PPA.
[02:52] <wgrant> I've no intrepid machines around now, sorry.
[02:53] <vadi2> Looks like new binary is built, I'll try again when the .debs are made
[02:54] <wgrant> You can get them now if you try hard, or in 6 minutes the normal way.
[02:56] <vadi2> hm. don't know how
[02:56] <vadi2> just got a bunch of 404's ;)
[03:03] <vadi2> alright, installed ppa9
[03:03] <vadi2> Same issue. $ mudlet
[03:03] <vadi2> mudlet: error while loading shared libraries: libqscintilla2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[03:04] <vadi2> http://mudlet.pastebin.com/m273c3577
[03:07] <vadi2> here is the build log for ppa9: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24822729/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.mudlet_0.2~beta8~ppa9_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
[03:07] <vadi2> it properly uses the ppa version too: Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid/main libqscintilla2-3 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~mudlet-ppa2 [663kB]
[03:07] <vadi2> So, consider my awfully confused :(
[03:08] <wgrant> I think your qscintilla is broken.
[03:12] <khopesh> so the code-hosting (sourceforge-like) portion of launchpad is slated to remain closed-source?
[03:13] <wgrant> khopesh: Unfortunately so :(. It's only the parts that actually store the branches and manage imports from CVS and SVN, AFAICT.
[03:14] <khopesh> eh?  I'm probalby missing something - how does that differ from the whole shebang?
[03:14] <wgrant> khopesh: You said 'sourceforge-like'. I'm not sure what you mean by that.
[03:14] <khopesh> what kind of bazaar interactivity does launchpad/codehosting permit?
[03:15] <wgrant> Uploading/downloading/browsing branches, and mirroring from other VCSes.
[03:15] <Snova> The first three I think are important, but I would be fine without mirroring, myself...
[03:15] <vadi2> wgrant: how can it be?
[03:16] <khopesh> i'm looking to implement a software-forge for my company's internal projects.  most important among the demands on such a thing are integrated wiki, bugs, and code repo, all with proper user separation to restrict access
[03:16] <wgrant> vadi2: Your package is somehow causing it to like against .so.3. I don't know how.
[03:16] <khopesh> we work almost exclusively in svn, and i don't imagine we'd change to bazaar
[03:16] <wgrant> vadi2: but it's not a PPA problem.
[03:17] <wgrant> khopesh: Launchpad doesn't have a wiki yet, and the code stuff doesn't support Subversion natively, even if it were to be released.
[03:18] <khopesh> right, but it supports "continuous import of subversion and cvs repositories directly into a bazaar branch" which might be close enough
[03:18] <wgrant> Those imports are not writable - they are one way.
[03:19] <khopesh> yeah, i know.  i suspect we'll be using fisheye too
[03:20] <khopesh> hmm, maybe i should re-visit the trac-wrapper systems then
[03:20] <khopesh> it's just that i got a resounding 'boo' from my developers regarding trac
[03:20] <vadi2> khopesh: I second them!
[03:21] <wgrant> Trac seems to do everything, but badly.
[03:21] <khopesh> but it appears far better than gforge or savane, and launchpad is likely a no-go, too
[03:21] <wgrant> Launchpad you would certainly have to do some work on to make it fit.
[03:21] <khopesh> wgrant and vadi2:  i agree
[03:22] <khopesh> i /really/ don't want to home-brew this...
[03:22] <vadi2> *cough* get the commercial license? it is available. (but, not a canonical employee, just a happy user)
[03:22] <vadi2> *for usage of lp
[03:23] <khopesh> oh, didn't know they were making that available
[03:23] <wgrant> khopesh: I'm sure you would find many supporters (and scare the heck out of Canonical) if you started a project to add native support for more VCSes. Lots of people want things like git support.
[03:23] <wgrant> You can get a commercial license to use launchpad.net for proprietary projects, but that won't do writable svn.
[03:23] <khopesh> yeah, the problem is that my CEO won't give me developers to lead on such a project.  this is a stealth project because he doesn't understand putting non-hardware resources in IT
[03:24] <wgrant> Ah. Unfortunate.
[03:24] <khopesh> ah, no.  we need to host it ourselves or else the government contractor customers of ours will throw fits
[03:25] <vadi2> ok, one other thing that you haven't listed
[03:25] <khopesh> so if i were to home-brew it, it would be me plus some interns
[03:25] <vadi2> is this github service they use. let me see if you can host that on your own
[03:25] <khopesh> "they" == canonnical?
[03:25] <vadi2> no
[03:25] <MTecknology> How can I have a bug that I only made a comment in (not subscribed to) not show up under lp.net/~me/+bugs?
[03:26] <wgrant> MTecknology: File a bug against Launchpad to remove commented-on bugs from that list.
[03:26] <vadi2> khopesh: no sorry, doesnt look like thats open source either. http://lighthouseapp.com/
[03:27] <wgrant> MTecknology: Serious bug-related people give up on +bugs quickly. I have hundreds upon hundreds of bugs there.
[03:27] <MTecknology> wgrant: oh, ok - I just try to skim it once in a while for things that are jsut sitting out there.
[03:28] <vadi2> khopesh: there was however a government person here a while back, looking to host a public government software on launchpad. maybe they'll understand. but that's a slim chance I know
[03:28] <wgrant> MTecknology: Although I have filed nearly 1000 bugs in Launchpad, so 600 on that list probably isn't too bad.
[03:31] <CarlFK> khopesh: you are looking for an open source bug tracking system?
[03:31] <CarlFK> er...
[03:31] <CarlFK> khopesh: you are looking for a bug tracking system that is open source that you can host on your own system?
[03:31] <khopesh> CarlFK: foss or no, doesn't really matter.  i prefer foss.  must have at least integrated bugs + code + wiki
[03:32] <khopesh> yes, i have to be able to host it
[03:32] <CarlFK> how about svn+trac
[03:32] <CarlFK> also I think http://alioth.debian.org would qualify
[03:32] <khopesh> CarlFK: my developers dislike trac, but it's where i'm leaning.  alioth runs gforge, which i'm considering
[03:36] <CarlFK> khopesh: my gf works at orbitz.com, very happy with http://www.jira.com
[03:37] <khopesh> ah, jira.  that rings a bell.
[03:37] <CarlFK> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/ "Because you've got issues!"  that's awesome
[03:38] <khopesh> those are the fisheye people, iirc
[03:39] <khopesh> two issues:  first, no wiki.  second, no code admin.  i need to be able to enable a manager to create a new project, which creates the software repository, wiki, and bug tracker
[03:40] <khopesh> jira can't do that because it is not a software forge.  it's a supplemental tool for existing svn projects.  we actually already plan to use some of atlassian's products (fisheye)
[05:05]  * hyperair yawns
[07:06] <JanC> bugs in the apport retracing service, should those be filed agains launchpad or against apport or ...?
[07:35] <wgrant> JanC: The retracer is part of apport.
[07:36] <JanC> well, I sent a mail to ubuntu-devel-discuss, people will see it there I hope
[07:36] <JanC> it's like 8:30am here and about time to sleep  ;)
[07:37] <wgrant> JanC: File against apport, if you're not asleep yet.
[07:38] <JanC> I'll try before i fall asleep on my keyboard...   :P
[07:39] <JanC> wgrant: would that be apport-in-ubuntu or apport "upstream" ?
[07:40] <wgrant> JanC: That's one of life's big unanswered questions.
[07:40] <wgrant> JanC: I guess see where the majority of bugs are now.
[07:52] <JanC> wgrant: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/355481  hope that sounds sensible when written while half asleep ;)
[11:50] <Unggnu> hi all
[11:51] <Unggnu> Is it possible to copy/link an Ubuntu bug to another launchpad bug system?
[11:51] <Unggnu> Without creating a new report?
[11:52] <hyperair> ?
[11:53] <hyperair> how about "also affects distribution"
[11:53] <hyperair> or "also affects project"
[11:53] <Unggnu> Ok, I have made a bug report against hplip package in Ubuntu. Hplip also uses launchpad so maybe I don't need to create a new report to make it upstream.
[11:53] <hyperair> yeah you can do that
[11:54] <Unggnu> How? :)
[11:54] <hyperair> click "also affects project"
[11:56] <Unggnu> seems to work, thank you
[11:56] <Unggnu> More people should use Launchpad, makes upstream reporting much more easier :-D
[11:59] <SMWEB> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~illyes-managers/illyes/main/files
[11:59] <SMWEB> Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server.
[11:59] <hyperair> heh only for ubuntu =p
[12:00] <SMWEB> Hi everybody. Could someone check out what's going wrong with this branch?
[12:00] <SMWEB> also, none of my other branches are working
[12:03] <hyperair> probably an issue with launchapd
[12:03] <hyperair> launchpad*
[12:03] <hyperair> the bug tracker including email interface crapped up this morning[
[12:04] <Unggnu> ciao
[12:07] <LarstiQ> SMWEB: the web interface might not work, but `bzr info lp:~illyes-managers/illyes/main` works fine
[12:08] <SMWEB> thanks for the info, i'll try again later then.
[14:06] <vadi2> wgrant: I figured out the problem/
[14:07] <vadi2> wgrant: turns out that since I had the program previously installed with "sudo make install", the .deb did not overwrite my binary when installing. Hence the previous old one was still there, and this issue was only local to me. In case you get someone else as stupid as me asking you about this ;)
[14:39] <skarn> I have a package that does not build
[14:39] <hyperair> my my, it doesn't build! the end of the world is near!
[14:39] <skarn> ok, you're right, just I do not understand why
[14:40] <skarn> http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/529363/arkn11745.scidavis_0.2.1-1%7Eskarn86_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt
[14:40] <skarn> seems the building process exits with segfault
[14:42] <skarn> http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/529363/arkn11745.scidavis_0.2.1-1-skarn86_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt
[14:43] <skarn> this one  is the correct url
[14:49] <hyperair> alright, i should be more clear in what i say. this isn't the right channel. you should ask in #ubuntu-motu
[14:49] <hyperair> also... a compiler segfaulting... is something really uncommon.
[14:50] <skarn> even being such a noob I thought it was something strange
[14:51] <skarn> and thank for addressing me to the right channel, I will immediately stop bothering you
[15:43] <aruetten> hy, since a half hour I can't get https://staging.launchpad.net/. Known problem?
[16:02] <joey> aruetten, interesting. We didn't check this yesterday when the site went down. At least I didn't check it
[16:03] <joey> aruetten, since it's not the production I won't page anyone out but I did let them know on our backchannel
[16:21] <aruetten> joey: thanks
[17:05] <CarlFK> in lp, how do I add a feature request?
[17:21] <weatherkid> how do i delete my project. i am weatherkid2005 and the project is OpenOS Project
[17:24] <weatherkid> how do i delete my project. i am weatherkid2005 and the project is OpenOS Project
[17:30] <LarstiQ> weatherkid: you ask for removal: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[17:30] <weatherkid> Thanks! Didn't think of that!
[17:31] <LarstiQ> np :)
[18:20] <smitty__> Hey everybody.  I just created a new package and I'd like to upload it to my ppa.  When I try to use dput to upload it I get this error: no signature on /home/smitty/packages/my-package/mypackage_0.1-0ubuntu1.dsc.
[18:24] <geser> smitty__: did you sign it with a key attached to your LP account?
[18:25] <smitty__> geser, I tried to.. there is a .asc file in the dir
[18:26] <geser> use debsign on the .changes files to properly sign it
[18:27] <smitty__> alright I'll try that
[18:28] <smitty__> That solved it.  Thanks for your help
[18:32] <smitty__> I've uploaded the files now with dput but I can't see anything new in my ppa.  Is there something else that I need to do or does it just take some time for the package to be displayed?
[18:33] <geser> it takes a few minutes before they appear on your ppa
[18:33] <smitty__> okay
[20:23] <Goundy> Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server.
[20:23] <Goundy> :/
[20:23] <Goundy> is launchpad having issues ?
[20:26] <LarstiQ> Goundy: it works for me, you'll have to be a bit more specific on what goes wrong.
[20:26] <Goundy> LarstiQ well am trying to visit my sources there: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~auresdev/aures/mainline/files
[20:26] <Goundy> and get this error with Try reloading this page in a minute or two. If the problem persists, let us know in the #launchpad IRC channel on Freenode.
[20:27] <LarstiQ> Goundy: aha, I see.
[20:27] <Goundy> LarstiQ :)
[20:28] <LarstiQ> gmb: what would be the procedure for an outsider like me in this case? It looks like loggerhead has fallen over.
[20:28] <LarstiQ> Goundy: so the web interface to your files isn't working at the moment.
[20:29] <LarstiQ> Goundy: you can still look at them in your local branch of course, and the code hosting part of launchpad is still working.
[20:29] <Goundy> LarstiQ well it's not a big problem you know I mean I don't absolutly need to access my sources as I already have a picture of them at home
[20:29] <Goundy> :)
[20:29] <Goundy> LarstiQ yea of course ;)
[20:29] <Goundy> Just reporting the problem so you know about it
[20:29] <LarstiQ> Goundy: thank you :)
[20:30] <Goundy> no problem ;)
[20:30] <LarstiQ> unfortunately I can't personally do anything
[20:31]  * LarstiQ goes back to figuring out why his xlwt.Formula isn't showing up in Excel while he waits for a Launchpad person to speak up
[20:31] <Goundy> hah
[20:32] <Goundy> LarstiQ excel sucks btw :°)
[20:33] <LarstiQ> Goundy: there isn't really an alternative I see for what I'm doing now
[20:33] <Goundy> LarstiQ bc :D
[20:33] <Goundy> Or script your formula in python XD
[20:33] <LarstiQ> Goundy: eh, no :P
[20:33] <LarstiQ> Goundy: I was doing that, but that is way more work
[20:34] <Goundy> right
[20:34] <LarstiQ> Goundy: xlwt, btw, is a python library to write Excel files
[20:34] <Goundy> Ah
[20:34] <Goundy> didn't know about it :)
[20:35] <LarstiQ> Goundy: the thing is, I have a lot of data, I don't know what the final processing will be like, HR is supposed to figure that out
[20:36] <Goundy> Ah I see...
[20:36] <Goundy> LarstiQ I work at a damn bank... and know a bit about that :/
[20:36] <LarstiQ> Goundy: I could write a Qt app to load the data and write functions so you can experiment etc, or just output an .xls file :)
[20:36] <LarstiQ> Goundy: ah
[20:36] <Goundy> eh
[20:36] <LarstiQ> Goundy: do you perhaps know ddaa?
[20:36] <Goundy> Nope
[20:37] <Goundy> sorry but I need to move :/
[20:37] <Goundy> Bbl
[20:37] <LarstiQ> ciao
[20:40] <goodlinuxuser> hi
[20:51] <goodlinuxuser> how i can chage language ubiquity or add new entry
[23:08] <lovebug356> Hello, I'm trying to upload a new version to launchpad ppa, it builds corrently on ppa but the builded pacakges does not show-up in the browser or pool. What can go wrong here?
[23:09] <maxb> lovebug356: it can take up to 20 minutes for files to be published to the pool
[23:09] <lovebug356> maxb: ok, thanks. I will just wait then :-)
[23:37] <rryan> Hi -- quick question (sorry if this is not the place for Launchpad questions) -- When I mention a bug on Launchpad (e.g. "Bug #XXXXXX"), it linkifies it to point to the bug. How can I do the same for branch revisions? Is there a syntax like lp:project/branch:rXXXX that will linkify it to point to the changeset in that branch? I've checked the online documentation but did not find whether this is possible.
[23:38] <thumper> rryan: there isn't one just yet
[23:38] <thumper> rryan: lp:project will link to the trunk branch though
[23:38] <rryan> thumper: I see -- thanks anyway. Launchpad is great btw, thanks!
[23:38] <thumper> rryan: if you really want it, file a bug :)
[23:39] <rryan> thumper : it's not terribly important :)