/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/04/06/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

[reed]mozilla bug 48696604:46
[reed]:)04:46
ubottuMozilla bug 486966 in Server Operations "hg.mozilla.org feeds have wrong hostname in them" [Normal,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48696604:46
rzrhi09:12
asacrzr: hi. i will check you thing after mail batch ;)09:13
rzrok i am around09:14
rzrdamit kvm b0rken in jaunty10:20
asac_@time10:55
ftagrrr, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=900711:19
gnomefreaksomwthing wrong with gwibber daily's?12:31
gnomefreaks/sonwthing/something12:31
gnomefreaki havent had a gwibber update in a while (1 week maybe)12:32
gnomefreakthat was an easy fix :)12:52
gnomefreakbug 23976313:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 239763 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox still running warning (dup-of: 308605)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23976313:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 308605 in firefox-3.0 "[MASTER]Firefox is already running message" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30860513:02
gnomefreakasac:  when you get a minute can you accept the nominations on bug 356274 its a bit early but just using it as a reminder14:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 356274 in seamonkey "[MASTER] Please update seamonkey to latest 1.1.16" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35627414:24
gnomefreak!info google-gadgets-common hardy15:19
ubottuPackage google-gadgets-common does not exist in hardy15:19
asacgnomefreak: we already have 1.1.16 ... so lets just upload that to jaunty15:38
gnomefreakasac: no we dont we have 1.1.1515:39
gnomefreak16 hasnt been released yet15:39
asacgnomefreak: well. we have all the patches that .16 has15:39
asacok approved jaunty task15:40
gnomefreakasac: still cant grab 1.1.16 using ./debian/rules ect15:40
asacwhy would you want to ?15:41
gnomefreakasac: why wouldnt i? it adds nobinonly and such why would i want to grab package from upstream and manualy change it?15:42
gnomefreakit looks like the fix for right click bug has been checked in but im betting not for 3.015:43
asacits not fixed in 3.015:43
asaci would think15:43
gnomefreakim thinking it wont be unless we cherry pick the patch but i dont think it meets SRU standards15:45
gnomefreakoh thats what you added to 1.1.1515:45
gnomefreakthe 2 patches15:45
gnomefreakif those 2 CVE's is it than we should only add it to Jaunty than deal with the overflow of "why doesnt hardy intrepid have latest version :) but lets wait until they are done with testing, Im thinking you grabed those patches from firefox nightly15:47
gnomefreakbug 34831616:00
ubottuLaunchpad bug 348316 in hal-cups-utils "Printer (HWModel Name) May Not Be Connected" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/34831616:01
asacgnomefreak: yes i patched the security issues for now16:14
asacgnomefreak: you have to drop those patches on the jaunty branch16:17
asacif you pull the 16 tag16:17
gnomefreakk i didnt think you added them to Jaunty version16:18
asaci added them everywhere16:21
asacyou need to drop them when next upstream release is coming16:21
gnomefreakasac: ok will do.16:38
fta[reed], http://paste.ubuntu.com/145617/19:01
gnomefreakfta: daily gwibber bot down?19:07
ftano19:08
gnomefreakim not getting an updates from it19:09
gnomefreakmaybe a week or 219:09
ftawhich version do you have?19:11
gnomefreak1.0.1~bzr280-0ubuntu1~daily1 and it still crashes and is unusible19:13
ftaworks for me19:13
fta280 is the freshest upstream has: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/trunk19:13
gnomefreakit crashes when i try to input my info same as all other versions19:14
ftafile a bug then19:14
ftadid you try the stable version in universe? 0.9.1~*19:15
ftagnomefreak, btw, the bot will only package stuff when upstream *or* the packaging branch has something new, no need otherwise19:16
[reed]fta: still having issues?19:17
gnomefreakfta: i know i figured upstream would release daily19:17
[reed]looks like hg repo just corrupt19:17
[reed]like, your local repo19:17
gnomefreakfta: i tried 0.8 0.9 and 1.* none work19:17
ftafile a bug, with the output of what you see when you start gwibber in a shell.19:21
ftamaybe BUGabundo already saw that19:21
fta[reed], strange, i don't see why/how my local tree could be corrupted19:22
[reed]it's hg19:22
[reed]:p19:22
gnomefreakdamnit now it works :( ok marking invalid19:26
fta[reed], ?19:29
ftaasac, what about gtk? (bug 190227)19:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 190227 in ia32-libs "ia32 apps look for libs on the wrong place" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19022719:31
[reed]fta: meaning, I've seen weird repo problems like that before with hg19:41
[reed]try a fresh clone19:41
fta[reed], in fact, i don't keep a local branch for comm-central, so if it's corrupted, it's on the server, I'll retry20:17
ftaFIREFOX_3_0_9_BUILD1, already?20:37
fta[reed], http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24903117/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090406r26991%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz21:27
[reed]fta: file a bug under Core :: ImageLib ?21:28
[reed]or track down the regressor21:28
fta[reed], not brilliant: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa?field.name_filter=xulrunner-1.9.2&field.status_filter=any&field.series_filter=jaunty21:29
fta26915..2693921:31
rzris back21:31
fta[reed], i'd say mozilla 42375621:36
ubottuMozilla bug 423756 in GFX: Thebes "Request: Switch for authors to turn on/off bilinear filtering when enlarging images" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42375621:36
=== rzr is now known as rZr
fta[reed], should I just add a comment in that bug?21:40
[reed]fta: yeah, and if that doesn't work, reopen it21:42
fta[reed], done, still closed though21:43
gnomefreakasac: is it you or mike that handle iceape in debian?22:45
gnomefreakon the maintainer spage it shows both of you with iceape22:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!