/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/04/08/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ghindoWhen's beta 4 supposed to come out?02:37
[reed]ghindo: when it's ready04:03
ghindo[reed]: Good answer.04:06
[reed]I never get tired of saying that. :)04:07
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreaksomeone feel free to shoot me this week11:42
gnomefreakThe following NEW packages will be installed: flashplugin-installer11:44
gnomefreakam i the only one that finds that strange sincei  have flash installed?11:44
BUGabundoah?11:48
gnomefreakif bookmarksftp doesnt work im going to hurt someone.11:54
* BUGabundo hides11:55
asacgnomefreak: thats from my ppa11:57
asacgnomefreak: i rename the package now11:57
asacgnomefreak: please test11:57
gnomefreakasac: you did?11:57
asaci uploaded to my ppa11:57
asacwant to upload to archive after lunch11:58
gnomefreakoh see i thought i was going to do that for 2 weeks now :)11:58
gnomefreakasac: what did you name it?12:00
gnomefreakasac: also no need to rename it AFAIK its license is free and they stopped supporting it so we should upload to the addons page for mozilla extesnsions12:01
gnomefreakasac: also if you just changed install.rdf debian control and rules you are going to need more changes12:02
gnomefreakasac: i cant test it since i dont have a place to upload bookmarks to12:09
BUGabundoasac: are we sure Bug 281348 is fixed?12:17
ubottuLaunchpad bug 281348 in ubufox "Firefox only shows default icons in toolbars with tabmixplus and ubufox installed" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/28134812:18
BUGabundoI builded a new FF3.5 profile12:18
BUGabundoadded tabmix plus, rebooted, and lost all my icons!12:18
gnomefreakBUGabundo: if i had to guess hes at lunch12:20
gnomefreakwell atleast i fixed it to install :)12:20
BUGabundognomefreak: sorry?12:20
gnomefreakBUGabundo: asac is most likely at lunch12:21
BUGabundoah ok12:21
BUGabundonp12:21
* gnomefreak doesnt see the package in asac's PPA but mine works atleast12:23
BUGabundoBug 32612912:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 326129 in firefox-3.5 "firefox-3.{5,6} bug, merge review comments don't get wrapped into div box" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32612912:24
gnomefreakasac: no reason to rename it just update the package we already have, and while you are pushing please push flashgot12:24
BUGabundognomefreak: can't you reproduce that bug ?12:25
gnomefreakBUGabundo: give me a minute to finish this and i will look at it  the bug doesnt ring a bell off hand12:26
BUGabundoI just comment on it12:26
BUGabundogrr12:26
BUGabundos/I/you/12:26
gnomefreakBUGabundo: did i say i couldnt reproduce?12:29
gnomefreakyeah i saw you coommented on my request for info12:29
BUGabundono you did not12:29
BUGabundoI just asked12:29
fta2BUGabundo, someone should file a bug upstream for that12:30
BUGabundoyeah12:30
BUGabundoanyone has a mozilla account?12:31
gnomefreakof course we all do/should12:31
* BUGabundo doesn't (yet)12:31
BUGabundoI'm already on too many BTS....12:31
gnomefreakill file it12:31
BUGabundowen will LP have a simple icon to push it upstream?12:31
BUGabundoit already does for projects hosted on LP... we just need the LP - BTS (insert here name) module/plugin to be more popular12:32
gnomefreakjust with info i have i will requst users to comment on the bug upstream if they can provide more info12:32
BUGabundook12:34
gnomefreakthis sounds more like a LP page problem, unless someone can reproduce in somewhere other than LP than i can file it upstream, I'm reassigned bug to launchpad12:37
BUGabundognomefreak: humm didn't it also got bad on Windows?12:39
BUGabundoI can test ALL my browsers I you want12:39
gnomefreakBUGabundo: yes but no other site but LP12:40
BUGabundolynx, crhomium, konquror, opera, etc12:40
BUGabundowhat other site has the same code?12:40
gnomefreakBUGabundo: that will work if you can test with other gecko/xul browssers and non gecko browsers12:40
BUGabundodoing so now12:40
gnomefreakBUGabundo: thanks im running for a smoke while you do that. just comment on the Lp bug report12:41
BUGabundognomefreak: konqueror fails too (aka webkit)12:45
BUGabundotime for lunch12:45
gnomefreakBUGabundo: thanks not an upstream bug than12:46
gnomefreakoops tried wrong alias fta2 can you please reject the bookmarksftp push to ubuntu.com archives12:55
gnomefreakasac: see bug 272746 to update info on bookmarksftp12:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 272746 in bookmarksftp "Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/27274612:59
asacgnomefreak: did you experience any problems with the new flashplugin-installer?13:15
asacgnomefreak: what is the TODO on bookmarksftp?13:15
gnomefreakasac: no i already have flash installed. Is that the package you wanted me to test? or bookmarks13:15
gnomefreakasac: i have updated it for 3.0.* at this time with same name as it was. I dont see any reason for a name change since it was under free license and no longer supported upstream13:16
asacgnomefreak: flashplugin-installer ... you said you got that on upgrade. do oyu have that now? is all working well?13:17
gnomefreakasac: it was added as a new pakcage and is installed at this time. However im not sure what it does that apt/dpkg does13:18
asacgnomefreak: yeah. so does flash still work?13:23
gnomefreakasac: yes13:23
asacafter restarting firefox/relogin13:23
asacgood13:23
gnomefreakasac: fta do you know 94thomas13:27
gnomefreaknever mind13:27
gnomefreakasac: if you want i can take bookmarksftp on since im losing sunbird whether its your package or mine that gets pushed13:39
asacgnomefreak: not sure what we have to do for sunbird in jaunty.13:56
asaci think all that is for karmic13:56
gnomefreakasac: nothing can be done once the icon changes are pushed13:57
gnomefreakasac: sunbird is dead as of 1.0b1 that is the end version. I am NOT uploading a beta to official archives unless a final will be made and upstream said they wont13:57
asacyes14:00
asacgnomefreak: so where are the icon changes?14:00
gnomefreakasac: in my branch and PPA ill get you branch one sec14:00
gnomefreakasac: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x14:01
BUGabundoback14:03
asacgnomefreak: why did you close ubuntu2?14:10
asaci merge the changelog now ... everything else looks good14:10
gnomefreakasac: huh?14:12
gnomefreakdid i close it?14:12
gnomefreakoh i remember that because of PPA versions got screwed up i pushed ubuntu2 to PPA had to replace it with 3 and forgot to fix branch sorry14:14
asacgnomefreak: its ok. i made a ubuntu2 out of it now14:17
gnomefreakasac: thanks14:17
asacgnomefreak: so does the official branding switch work? did you try?14:17
gnomefreakasac: yep like a charm14:17
gnomefreaki pushed tp PPA and installed it here :)14:17
asacgnomefreak: can you subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsores to the bug it closes? 17878514:23
asacgnomefreak: that gives me sponsoring credits ;)14:23
gnomefreakasac: yeah one sec14:23
asacgnomefreak: also the build failure you fixed by dropping the patch could have deserved a bug14:23
asacif you still want to open one let me know ... i can add that to changelog then14:24
gnomefreakasac: a separate bug for drpping patches?14:24
gnomefreakok subscribed to bug14:25
asacgnomefreak: a separate bug for "sunbird fails to build in jaunty because of fontconfig changes"14:25
asacbut its ok14:25
asaci will upload without it now14:25
gnomefreakok thanks14:25
asacgnomefreak: uploaded14:27
gnomefreakasac: THANKSW14:27
gnomefreakthanks even14:27
asacgnomefreak: so to be just i dont think we will get flashgot. we got rejected by archive admins twice so i think we should look at this in karmic again15:10
asacgnomefreak: fails to build on armel ;)15:16
asacprobably need the arm patch from tbird15:17
gnomefreaksunbird?15:21
* gnomefreak didnt think we supported that arch15:23
* gnomefreak grapping tbird to look at patch15:24
gnomefreakok changed status to fixcommited while i patch it15:28
gnomefreakasac: tbird-3.0 doesnt have that patch ill look at 2.0 in a few15:29
asacgnomefreak: we support it. its not superurgent though as its universe15:41
gnomefreakshould i patch it for ubuntu3? sometime this week/weekend?15:42
asacgnomefreak: yeah.15:43
asacwe want it ... i guess15:43
gnomefreakok no problem if i get it done today ill let you know but I'm doing paper work for end of fiscal year but that will work me into most likely next week :)15:44
gnomefreakasac: your gonna hate me ;) can you please push seamonkey/iceape to Debian as i recall it was about 1.1.x.15:50
asacgnomefreak: debian iceape isnt maintained by me anymore15:51
asacbut i will check when at home later tonight15:51
gnomefreakhttp://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/7a1e70c927efa7c6#  is why im asking. if needed ill build sid chroot and do it when i get spare time. i guess noone maintains it anymore since it was removed in lenny15:52
gnomefreakoyh what is that ladies name :(16:05
asaclady?16:05
rzrasac: my pgp key expired16:06
rzrtoo bad16:06
rzri didnt updated it16:06
asacrzr: you can extend it16:06
asaci think you can do that afterwards still16:06
rzrgreat16:06
asace.g. edit-keys16:06
asacchange expiry date16:07
gnomefreakasac: i got it Rachae was who i was thinking about16:07
* gnomefreak doesnt set an expiration on mine16:07
rzri did this before16:08
gnomefreakah16:09
rzrbut it does not seems to change the subkey16:09
asacrzr: create a new subkey then16:10
asacor try to change expiry for the sukey directly16:11
asacbut in the end creating new subkeys and letting them expire is a good thing16:11
rzri'd like to understand 1st :)16:11
asaci do that at least ;=)16:11
asaci have a master key that is infinitely valid, but never use it16:11
asaconly to sign sukeys (and other keys of course)16:11
asacso i have a sign and a encrypt subkey16:12
asacthat regularly expire and i create new ones16:12
rzrok it's done16:26
rzrthx16:29
rzrgnomefreak: do you think you'll live foreever ?16:30
rzri dont want to be rude .. but16:30
gnomefreakrzr: i hope not16:30
BUGabundowon't we all?16:30
rzrBUGabundo: it only depends on your expiration date of your pgp key16:31
BUGabundoah that! LOL16:31
BUGabundoI think I have mine with 2 y16:32
gnomefreakyou have got to be kidding. do we really support 2000+ bookmarks? that is a bit outragous IMHO16:38
gnomefreaksee bug 35727616:38
ubottuError: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/357276/+text)16:38
gnomefreakhuh16:39
gnomefreakthats not right16:39
gnomefreakits the right number16:39
gnomefreakbug 35727616:39
ubottuLaunchpad bug 357276 in firefox-3.0 "Large set of bookmarks causes Firefox 3.08 to hang" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35727616:39
=== jtv1 is now known as jtv
gnomefreakasac: pick a patch 18_arm_xpcom_unused_attribute.dpatch16:49
gnomefreak38_arm_xpcom_optim.dpatch16:49
asacgnomefreak: i guess both18:09
Jazzvaasac: for nspluginwrapper, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some npwrapper.*.so in /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/. I think BUGabundo reported that in the initial bug18:09
Jazzvabug 32181418:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 321814 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper creates "default" links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32181418:10
Jazzvaasac: ^^, I think you should add that dir to postinst removal too (along those added in npw revision 51)18:11
asacJazzva: hmm.18:14
asacnot sure about the iceweasel18:14
asacdidnt i add that?18:14
asacseems not ;)18:14
asacyeah.. might make sense18:14
asacbut shouldnt hurt unless you use iceweasel18:15
Jazzvawell, it was listed in default dirs added in 001_ patch (I think it's 001 patch)18:15
Jazzvasince we're not shipping iceweasel, I removed it from that patch here http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu/revision/48#debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff18:16
Jazzvaasac: also, those are the dirs that were added by debian, and are ignored if NSPLUGIN_DIRS is specified18:17
asacJazzva: ok.  can you add the dirs we want to add and bump the version check to the new package?18:23
asaci am on train ;) ... and unefficient18:23
asactonight is freeze so we have to get it in asap18:24
asacend-freeze18:24
Jazzvasure18:24
Jazzvagive me a sec18:24
asaci am travelling for a bit still ... if you have those two things added (i guess xulrunner/iceweasel/iceape) maybe fta can also upload18:28
Jazzvahm, we didn't create anything in xulrunner and iceape, at least not with that patch.18:29
asacJazzva: not sure. look at all those supported dirs in the code18:29
asacif we never used iceweasel/iceape its probably fine18:29
asacto not name them18:29
Jazzvawell, BUGabundo had a problem with iceweasel dir, so I think there might be other people who have npwrappers installed in it too.18:30
asacyou will figure ;)18:30
BUGabundoJazzva: ME??18:30
BUGabundoI don't even use it!18:30
JazzvaBUGabundo: bug 321814 :)18:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 321814 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper creates "default" links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32181418:30
* BUGabundo reads18:30
asacJazzva: BUGabundo has lots of issues others dont see :)18:31
BUGabundoah18:31
BUGabundothat18:31
Jazzvayou mentioned it there. I didn't say you were using it, I said you had a problem with npwrapper creating links in iceweasel dir, and then not removing them :)18:31
asacbut i guess that BUGabundo just has better eyes ;)18:31
asacok packgin things ... have to switch train18:31
Jazzva(well, I thought of that, not said actually)18:31
asaccu later18:31
Jazzvacu18:31
BUGabundoor I just test everything to the point of bugs pop out18:32
Jazzvaasac: I'll have to ask you before submitting the revision, because we're appending NSPLUGIN_DIRS in get_mozilla_plugin_dirs at the end of already existing array.18:32
gnomefreakhes gone already19:02
gnomefreakright?19:02
gnomefreakBUGabundo: did the update or gnome-keyring help for you?19:03
BUGabundolet me check19:05
BUGabundoat least gwibber worked at 1st once I reboot19:06
BUGabundousually I have to start it 2 or 3 times19:06
BUGabundobut I could be a coicidence19:07
BUGabundo"Couldn't retrieve GConf value for key: password"19:07
gnomefreakBUGabundo: yep me too good it was fixed for gwibber at least19:07
gnomefreakBUGabundo: during the update?19:07
BUGabundoNow19:07
BUGabundoafter starting gwibber from cli19:07
gnomefreakBUGabundo: let me check that in a few19:08
BUGabundook19:08
BUGabundoI have to go19:08
BUGabundoif I can, I'll pop up later tonigh19:08
gnomefreakerror: duplicate REP tables used19:08
gnomefreakFailure loading aff file /usr/share/myspell/dicts/en_ZA.aff19:08
BUGabundoI have a b'day dinner so I don't have much time19:08
gnomefreakbut that is normal to see19:08
gnomefreakBUGabundo: have fun19:09
BUGabundoafter reboot ill test gw again19:09
BUGabundobye19:09
gnomefreakhappy birthday19:12
gnomefreakoh damn hes gone19:12
gnomefreakok im gone maybe ill work on sunbird tomorrow19:35
Jazzvaasac: I proposed a merge https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/1.2.2-0ubuntu5/+merge/5362 .19:55
Jazzvaasac: I think we should only add iceweasel dir, as this bug was related to broken links. IIRC nspluginwrapper handles removal of plugins in its def. dirs pretty well, so no need to remove that in postinst.19:56
asacJazzva: uploaded21:55
Jazzvaasac: thanks22:01
ftahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/25051851/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090408r27086%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz22:22
ftaeither we need a fresher nss, or there's something broken22:22
asacfta: still broken?22:26
asacor just lpiua?22:26
asaclooks like in source nss got bumped22:27
asacor not?22:27
ftai guess all failed, but there are only a few builders today22:29
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/builders/22:29
asacdid we have a successful build in between at least?22:29
* asac knew he should have pushed that snapshot ;)22:30
asacfta: so just bumping minimal nss version and updating nss later?22:30
asacis that a plan?22:30
ftaneed to check nss commits22:31
ftahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/25063384/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.thunderbird-3.0_3.0~b3~hg20090408r2363%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz22:32
ftasame22:32
ftamozilla 43748722:35
ubottuMozilla bug 437487 in Socorro "add a "distributor" field to the database" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43748722:35
gnomefreakasac: how the hell do you attach something to a debian bug report?22:38
asacgnomefreak: what do you mean by "attach something"?22:40
asacleave a message?22:40
asacor attach a file?22:40
gnomefreakasac: send a file22:40
asacgnomefreak: how do you leave a message ;)?22:41
gnomefreakthe bug tracker doesnt have an interface to add anything22:41
gnomefreakasac: i would rather not paste the diff if i can avoid it22:41
asacgnomefreak: the bug tracker is email driven22:42
asaceverything is mail22:42
asacyou send to address a mail ... that can also have attachments of cours22:42
gnomefreakso just attach it like any other file? with email attach option?22:43
asacfta: thats good news ;)22:45
asaci have to talk to ted i guess22:45
gnomefreakwell that didnt work23:08
asacgnomefreak: where did you send the mail?23:09
asacwhere to23:09
gnomefreakasac: trying to send it to debian bug. he wanted the diff23:09
asacgnomefreak: so which address are you sending to?23:09
gnomefreak492837@bugs.debian.org23:09
gnomefreakshould i send it personally to him?23:10
asacgnomefreak: no thts ok23:10
gnomefreakits there?23:10
asacgnomefreak: why do you think it doesnt work?23:10
gnomefreaki dont see it23:10
asacdebian bug 49283723:10
ubottuDebian bug 492837 in mozilla-bookmarksftp "mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/49283723:11
asacgnomefreak: takes about 10-30 minutes23:11
asacto show up23:11
gnomefreakoh23:11
asacyou usually get a confirm mail after 5 minutes or so23:11
asacbut could be that such a confirm just gets send out if you tweak flags like importance and so on in the mail23:11
gnomefreakyeah ive gotten them just not when attached files23:11
asacgnomefreak: maybe dont sign your mail. could be that it gets confused. but for now wait a bit longer... when did you send it?23:12
asacgnomefreak: seems it has arrived23:13
gnomefreakasac: not sure maybe 4-5 minutes ago but ill will have meail open for a bit longer anyway23:13
gnomefreakit did?23:13
asacgnomefreak: you attached the .dsc and not a  diff ;)23:13
gnomefreakoh cool23:13
gnomefreakno23:13
gnomefreakoh shit23:13
asacyes ;)23:14
asacstay focussed :-P23:14
ftamozilla 48505223:15
ubottuMozilla bug 485052 in Security: PSM "Embed a list of default OCSP Responder URLs for certain CAs" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48505223:15
fta"We need the upcoming NSS 3.12.3 release."23:15
gnomefreakthis time it said debdiff and i opened it from email compose window and its right god i hope its right23:16
ftamozilla 48618223:17
ubottuMozilla bug 486182 in Security: PSM "Land NSS 3.12.3 final in mozilla-central (the experimental firefox trunk)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48618223:17
* gnomefreak wonders if its that easy for LP too23:27
asacfta: yeah. i think we will get that everywhere23:29
gnomefreakthere sent her another email23:38
gnomefreakok good debian got the debdiff, now lets see if i cant get patches oved over and built23:39
gnomefreakasac: what is the name of the arm arch? i cant recall spelling23:50
asacarmel23:50
gnomefreakah good think i had e m mixed up23:51
gnomefreakthanks23:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!