[02:37] <ghindo> When's beta 4 supposed to come out?
[04:03] <[reed]> ghindo: when it's ready
[04:06] <ghindo> [reed]: Good answer.
[04:07] <[reed]> I never get tired of saying that. :)
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[11:42] <gnomefreak> someone feel free to shoot me this week
[11:44] <gnomefreak> The following NEW packages will be installed: flashplugin-installer
[11:44] <gnomefreak> am i the only one that finds that strange sincei  have flash installed?
[11:48] <BUGabundo> ah?
[11:54] <gnomefreak> if bookmarksftp doesnt work im going to hurt someone.
[11:55]  * BUGabundo hides
[11:57] <asac> gnomefreak: thats from my ppa
[11:57] <asac> gnomefreak: i rename the package now
[11:57] <asac> gnomefreak: please test
[11:57] <gnomefreak> asac: you did?
[11:57] <asac> i uploaded to my ppa
[11:58] <asac> want to upload to archive after lunch
[11:58] <gnomefreak> oh see i thought i was going to do that for 2 weeks now :)
[12:00] <gnomefreak> asac: what did you name it?
[12:01] <gnomefreak> asac: also no need to rename it AFAIK its license is free and they stopped supporting it so we should upload to the addons page for mozilla extesnsions
[12:02] <gnomefreak> asac: also if you just changed install.rdf debian control and rules you are going to need more changes
[12:09] <gnomefreak> asac: i cant test it since i dont have a place to upload bookmarks to
[12:17] <BUGabundo> asac: are we sure Bug 281348 is fixed?
[12:18] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 281348 in ubufox "Firefox only shows default icons in toolbars with tabmixplus and ubufox installed" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/281348
[12:18] <BUGabundo> I builded a new FF3.5 profile
[12:18] <BUGabundo> added tabmix plus, rebooted, and lost all my icons!
[12:20] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: if i had to guess hes at lunch
[12:20] <gnomefreak> well atleast i fixed it to install :)
[12:20] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: sorry?
[12:21] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: asac is most likely at lunch
[12:21] <BUGabundo> ah ok
[12:21] <BUGabundo> np
[12:23]  * gnomefreak doesnt see the package in asac's PPA but mine works atleast
[12:24] <BUGabundo> Bug 326129
[12:24] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 326129 in firefox-3.5 "firefox-3.{5,6} bug, merge review comments don't get wrapped into div box" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/326129
[12:24] <gnomefreak> asac: no reason to rename it just update the package we already have, and while you are pushing please push flashgot
[12:25] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: can't you reproduce that bug ?
[12:26] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: give me a minute to finish this and i will look at it  the bug doesnt ring a bell off hand
[12:26] <BUGabundo> I just comment on it
[12:26] <BUGabundo> grr
[12:26] <BUGabundo> s/I/you/
[12:29] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: did i say i couldnt reproduce?
[12:29] <gnomefreak> yeah i saw you coommented on my request for info
[12:29] <BUGabundo> no you did not
[12:29] <BUGabundo> I just asked
[12:30] <fta2> BUGabundo, someone should file a bug upstream for that
[12:30] <BUGabundo> yeah
[12:31] <BUGabundo> anyone has a mozilla account?
[12:31] <gnomefreak> of course we all do/should
[12:31]  * BUGabundo doesn't (yet)
[12:31] <BUGabundo> I'm already on too many BTS....
[12:31] <gnomefreak> ill file it
[12:31] <BUGabundo> wen will LP have a simple icon to push it upstream?
[12:32] <BUGabundo> it already does for projects hosted on LP... we just need the LP - BTS (insert here name) module/plugin to be more popular
[12:32] <gnomefreak> just with info i have i will requst users to comment on the bug upstream if they can provide more info
[12:34] <BUGabundo> ok
[12:37] <gnomefreak> this sounds more like a LP page problem, unless someone can reproduce in somewhere other than LP than i can file it upstream, I'm reassigned bug to launchpad
[12:39] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: humm didn't it also got bad on Windows?
[12:39] <BUGabundo> I can test ALL my browsers I you want
[12:40] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: yes but no other site but LP
[12:40] <BUGabundo> lynx, crhomium, konquror, opera, etc
[12:40] <BUGabundo> what other site has the same code?
[12:40] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: that will work if you can test with other gecko/xul browssers and non gecko browsers
[12:40] <BUGabundo> doing so now
[12:41] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: thanks im running for a smoke while you do that. just comment on the Lp bug report
[12:45] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: konqueror fails too (aka webkit)
[12:45] <BUGabundo> time for lunch
[12:46] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: thanks not an upstream bug than
[12:55] <gnomefreak> oops tried wrong alias fta2 can you please reject the bookmarksftp push to ubuntu.com archives
[12:59] <gnomefreak> asac: see bug 272746 to update info on bookmarksftp
[12:59] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 272746 in bookmarksftp "Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272746
[13:15] <asac> gnomefreak: did you experience any problems with the new flashplugin-installer?
[13:15] <asac> gnomefreak: what is the TODO on bookmarksftp?
[13:15] <gnomefreak> asac: no i already have flash installed. Is that the package you wanted me to test? or bookmarks
[13:16] <gnomefreak> asac: i have updated it for 3.0.* at this time with same name as it was. I dont see any reason for a name change since it was under free license and no longer supported upstream
[13:17] <asac> gnomefreak: flashplugin-installer ... you said you got that on upgrade. do oyu have that now? is all working well?
[13:18] <gnomefreak> asac: it was added as a new pakcage and is installed at this time. However im not sure what it does that apt/dpkg does
[13:23] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah. so does flash still work?
[13:23] <gnomefreak> asac: yes
[13:23] <asac> after restarting firefox/relogin
[13:23] <asac> good
[13:27] <gnomefreak> asac: fta do you know 94thomas
[13:27] <gnomefreak> never mind
[13:39] <gnomefreak> asac: if you want i can take bookmarksftp on since im losing sunbird whether its your package or mine that gets pushed
[13:56] <asac> gnomefreak: not sure what we have to do for sunbird in jaunty.
[13:56] <asac> i think all that is for karmic
[13:57] <gnomefreak> asac: nothing can be done once the icon changes are pushed
[13:57] <gnomefreak> asac: sunbird is dead as of 1.0b1 that is the end version. I am NOT uploading a beta to official archives unless a final will be made and upstream said they wont
[14:00] <asac> yes
[14:00] <asac> gnomefreak: so where are the icon changes?
[14:00] <gnomefreak> asac: in my branch and PPA ill get you branch one sec
[14:01] <gnomefreak> asac: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x
[14:03] <BUGabundo> back
[14:10] <asac> gnomefreak: why did you close ubuntu2?
[14:10] <asac> i merge the changelog now ... everything else looks good
[14:12] <gnomefreak> asac: huh?
[14:12] <gnomefreak> did i close it?
[14:14] <gnomefreak> oh i remember that because of PPA versions got screwed up i pushed ubuntu2 to PPA had to replace it with 3 and forgot to fix branch sorry
[14:17] <asac> gnomefreak: its ok. i made a ubuntu2 out of it now
[14:17] <gnomefreak> asac: thanks
[14:17] <asac> gnomefreak: so does the official branding switch work? did you try?
[14:17] <gnomefreak> asac: yep like a charm
[14:17] <gnomefreak> i pushed tp PPA and installed it here :)
[14:23] <asac> gnomefreak: can you subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsores to the bug it closes? 178785
[14:23] <asac> gnomefreak: that gives me sponsoring credits ;)
[14:23] <gnomefreak> asac: yeah one sec
[14:23] <asac> gnomefreak: also the build failure you fixed by dropping the patch could have deserved a bug
[14:24] <asac> if you still want to open one let me know ... i can add that to changelog then
[14:24] <gnomefreak> asac: a separate bug for drpping patches?
[14:25] <gnomefreak> ok subscribed to bug
[14:25] <asac> gnomefreak: a separate bug for "sunbird fails to build in jaunty because of fontconfig changes"
[14:25] <asac> but its ok
[14:25] <asac> i will upload without it now
[14:25] <gnomefreak> ok thanks
[14:27] <asac> gnomefreak: uploaded
[14:27] <gnomefreak> asac: THANKSW
[14:27] <gnomefreak> thanks even
[15:10] <asac> gnomefreak: so to be just i dont think we will get flashgot. we got rejected by archive admins twice so i think we should look at this in karmic again
[15:16] <asac> gnomefreak: fails to build on armel ;)
[15:17] <asac> probably need the arm patch from tbird
[15:21] <gnomefreak> sunbird?
[15:23]  * gnomefreak didnt think we supported that arch
[15:24]  * gnomefreak grapping tbird to look at patch
[15:28] <gnomefreak> ok changed status to fixcommited while i patch it
[15:29] <gnomefreak> asac: tbird-3.0 doesnt have that patch ill look at 2.0 in a few
[15:41] <asac> gnomefreak: we support it. its not superurgent though as its universe
[15:42] <gnomefreak> should i patch it for ubuntu3? sometime this week/weekend?
[15:43] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah.
[15:43] <asac> we want it ... i guess
[15:44] <gnomefreak> ok no problem if i get it done today ill let you know but I'm doing paper work for end of fiscal year but that will work me into most likely next week :)
[15:50] <gnomefreak> asac: your gonna hate me ;) can you please push seamonkey/iceape to Debian as i recall it was about 1.1.x.
[15:51] <asac> gnomefreak: debian iceape isnt maintained by me anymore
[15:51] <asac> but i will check when at home later tonight
[15:52] <gnomefreak> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/browse_thread/thread/7a1e70c927efa7c6#  is why im asking. if needed ill build sid chroot and do it when i get spare time. i guess noone maintains it anymore since it was removed in lenny
[16:05] <gnomefreak> oyh what is that ladies name :(
[16:05] <asac> lady?
[16:06] <rzr> asac: my pgp key expired
[16:06] <rzr> too bad
[16:06] <rzr> i didnt updated it
[16:06] <asac> rzr: you can extend it
[16:06] <asac> i think you can do that afterwards still
[16:06] <rzr> great
[16:06] <asac> e.g. edit-keys
[16:07] <asac> change expiry date
[16:07] <gnomefreak> asac: i got it Rachae was who i was thinking about
[16:07]  * gnomefreak doesnt set an expiration on mine
[16:08] <rzr> i did this before
[16:09] <gnomefreak> ah
[16:09] <rzr> but it does not seems to change the subkey
[16:10] <asac> rzr: create a new subkey then
[16:11] <asac> or try to change expiry for the sukey directly
[16:11] <asac> but in the end creating new subkeys and letting them expire is a good thing
[16:11] <rzr> i'd like to understand 1st :)
[16:11] <asac> i do that at least ;=)
[16:11] <asac> i have a master key that is infinitely valid, but never use it
[16:11] <asac> only to sign sukeys (and other keys of course)
[16:12] <asac> so i have a sign and a encrypt subkey
[16:12] <asac> that regularly expire and i create new ones
[16:26] <rzr> ok it's done
[16:29] <rzr> thx
[16:30] <rzr> gnomefreak: do you think you'll live foreever ?
[16:30] <rzr> i dont want to be rude .. but
[16:30] <gnomefreak> rzr: i hope not
[16:30] <BUGabundo> won't we all?
[16:31] <rzr> BUGabundo: it only depends on your expiration date of your pgp key
[16:31] <BUGabundo> ah that! LOL
[16:32] <BUGabundo> I think I have mine with 2 y
[16:38] <gnomefreak> you have got to be kidding. do we really support 2000+ bookmarks? that is a bit outragous IMHO
[16:38] <gnomefreak> see bug 357276
[16:38] <ubottu> Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/357276/+text)
[16:39] <gnomefreak> huh
[16:39] <gnomefreak> thats not right
[16:39] <gnomefreak> its the right number
[16:39] <gnomefreak> bug 357276
[16:39] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 357276 in firefox-3.0 "Large set of bookmarks causes Firefox 3.08 to hang" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/357276
=== jtv1 is now known as jtv
[16:49] <gnomefreak> asac: pick a patch 18_arm_xpcom_unused_attribute.dpatch
[16:49] <gnomefreak> 38_arm_xpcom_optim.dpatch
[18:09] <asac> gnomefreak: i guess both
[18:09] <Jazzva> asac: for nspluginwrapper, I'm not sure, but I think there might be some npwrapper.*.so in /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/. I think BUGabundo reported that in the initial bug
[18:10] <Jazzva> bug 321814
[18:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 321814 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper creates "default" links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/321814
[18:11] <Jazzva> asac: ^^, I think you should add that dir to postinst removal too (along those added in npw revision 51)
[18:14] <asac> Jazzva: hmm.
[18:14] <asac> not sure about the iceweasel
[18:14] <asac> didnt i add that?
[18:14] <asac> seems not ;)
[18:14] <asac> yeah.. might make sense
[18:15] <asac> but shouldnt hurt unless you use iceweasel
[18:15] <Jazzva> well, it was listed in default dirs added in 001_ patch (I think it's 001 patch)
[18:16] <Jazzva> since we're not shipping iceweasel, I removed it from that patch here http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/nspluginwrapper/ubuntu/revision/48#debian/patches/000_debian_make_symlinks.diff
[18:17] <Jazzva> asac: also, those are the dirs that were added by debian, and are ignored if NSPLUGIN_DIRS is specified
[18:23] <asac> Jazzva: ok.  can you add the dirs we want to add and bump the version check to the new package?
[18:23] <asac> i am on train ;) ... and unefficient
[18:24] <asac> tonight is freeze so we have to get it in asap
[18:24] <asac> end-freeze
[18:24] <Jazzva> sure
[18:24] <Jazzva> give me a sec
[18:28] <asac> i am travelling for a bit still ... if you have those two things added (i guess xulrunner/iceweasel/iceape) maybe fta can also upload
[18:29] <Jazzva> hm, we didn't create anything in xulrunner and iceape, at least not with that patch.
[18:29] <asac> Jazzva: not sure. look at all those supported dirs in the code
[18:29] <asac> if we never used iceweasel/iceape its probably fine
[18:29] <asac> to not name them
[18:30] <Jazzva> well, BUGabundo had a problem with iceweasel dir, so I think there might be other people who have npwrappers installed in it too.
[18:30] <asac> you will figure ;)
[18:30] <BUGabundo> Jazzva: ME??
[18:30] <BUGabundo> I don't even use it!
[18:30] <Jazzva> BUGabundo: bug 321814 :)
[18:30] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 321814 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper creates "default" links even though NSPLUGINDIR is set" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/321814
[18:30]  * BUGabundo reads
[18:31] <asac> Jazzva: BUGabundo has lots of issues others dont see :)
[18:31] <BUGabundo> ah
[18:31] <BUGabundo> that
[18:31] <Jazzva> you mentioned it there. I didn't say you were using it, I said you had a problem with npwrapper creating links in iceweasel dir, and then not removing them :)
[18:31] <asac> but i guess that BUGabundo just has better eyes ;)
[18:31] <asac> ok packgin things ... have to switch train
[18:31] <Jazzva> (well, I thought of that, not said actually)
[18:31] <asac> cu later
[18:31] <Jazzva> cu
[18:32] <BUGabundo> or I just test everything to the point of bugs pop out
[18:32] <Jazzva> asac: I'll have to ask you before submitting the revision, because we're appending NSPLUGIN_DIRS in get_mozilla_plugin_dirs at the end of already existing array.
[19:02] <gnomefreak> hes gone already
[19:02] <gnomefreak> right?
[19:03] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: did the update or gnome-keyring help for you?
[19:05] <BUGabundo> let me check
[19:06] <BUGabundo> at least gwibber worked at 1st once I reboot
[19:06] <BUGabundo> usually I have to start it 2 or 3 times
[19:07] <BUGabundo> but I could be a coicidence
[19:07] <BUGabundo> "Couldn't retrieve GConf value for key: password"
[19:07] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: yep me too good it was fixed for gwibber at least
[19:07] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: during the update?
[19:07] <BUGabundo> Now
[19:07] <BUGabundo> after starting gwibber from cli
[19:08] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: let me check that in a few
[19:08] <BUGabundo> ok
[19:08] <BUGabundo> I have to go
[19:08] <BUGabundo> if I can, I'll pop up later tonigh
[19:08] <gnomefreak> error: duplicate REP tables used
[19:08] <gnomefreak> Failure loading aff file /usr/share/myspell/dicts/en_ZA.aff
[19:08] <BUGabundo> I have a b'day dinner so I don't have much time
[19:08] <gnomefreak> but that is normal to see
[19:09] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: have fun
[19:09] <BUGabundo> after reboot ill test gw again
[19:09] <BUGabundo> bye
[19:12] <gnomefreak> happy birthday
[19:12] <gnomefreak> oh damn hes gone
[19:35] <gnomefreak> ok im gone maybe ill work on sunbird tomorrow
[19:55] <Jazzva> asac: I proposed a merge https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jazzva/nspluginwrapper/1.2.2-0ubuntu5/+merge/5362 .
[19:56] <Jazzva> asac: I think we should only add iceweasel dir, as this bug was related to broken links. IIRC nspluginwrapper handles removal of plugins in its def. dirs pretty well, so no need to remove that in postinst.
[21:55] <asac> Jazzva: uploaded
[22:01] <Jazzva> asac: thanks
[22:22] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25051851/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.xulrunner-1.9.2_1.9.2~a1~hg20090408r27086%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[22:22] <fta> either we need a fresher nss, or there's something broken
[22:26] <asac> fta: still broken?
[22:26] <asac> or just lpiua?
[22:27] <asac> looks like in source nss got bumped
[22:27] <asac> or not?
[22:29] <fta> i guess all failed, but there are only a few builders today
[22:29] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/
[22:29] <asac> did we have a successful build in between at least?
[22:30]  * asac knew he should have pushed that snapshot ;)
[22:30] <asac> fta: so just bumping minimal nss version and updating nss later?
[22:30] <asac> is that a plan?
[22:31] <fta> need to check nss commits
[22:32] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25063384/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.thunderbird-3.0_3.0~b3~hg20090408r2363%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[22:32] <fta> same
[22:35] <fta> mozilla 437487
[22:35] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 437487 in Socorro "add a "distributor" field to the database" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437487
[22:38] <gnomefreak> asac: how the hell do you attach something to a debian bug report?
[22:40] <asac> gnomefreak: what do you mean by "attach something"?
[22:40] <asac> leave a message?
[22:40] <asac> or attach a file?
[22:40] <gnomefreak> asac: send a file
[22:41] <asac> gnomefreak: how do you leave a message ;)?
[22:41] <gnomefreak> the bug tracker doesnt have an interface to add anything
[22:41] <gnomefreak> asac: i would rather not paste the diff if i can avoid it
[22:42] <asac> gnomefreak: the bug tracker is email driven
[22:42] <asac> everything is mail
[22:42] <asac> you send to address a mail ... that can also have attachments of cours
[22:43] <gnomefreak> so just attach it like any other file? with email attach option?
[22:45] <asac> fta: thats good news ;)
[22:45] <asac> i have to talk to ted i guess
[23:08] <gnomefreak> well that didnt work
[23:09] <asac> gnomefreak: where did you send the mail?
[23:09] <asac> where to
[23:09] <gnomefreak> asac: trying to send it to debian bug. he wanted the diff
[23:09] <asac> gnomefreak: so which address are you sending to?
[23:09] <gnomefreak> 492837@bugs.debian.org
[23:10] <gnomefreak> should i send it personally to him?
[23:10] <asac> gnomefreak: no thts ok
[23:10] <gnomefreak> its there?
[23:10] <asac> gnomefreak: why do you think it doesnt work?
[23:10] <gnomefreak> i dont see it
[23:10] <asac> debian bug 492837
[23:11] <ubottu> Debian bug 492837 in mozilla-bookmarksftp "mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/492837
[23:11] <asac> gnomefreak: takes about 10-30 minutes
[23:11] <asac> to show up
[23:11] <gnomefreak> oh
[23:11] <asac> you usually get a confirm mail after 5 minutes or so
[23:11] <asac> but could be that such a confirm just gets send out if you tweak flags like importance and so on in the mail
[23:11] <gnomefreak> yeah ive gotten them just not when attached files
[23:12] <asac> gnomefreak: maybe dont sign your mail. could be that it gets confused. but for now wait a bit longer... when did you send it?
[23:13] <asac> gnomefreak: seems it has arrived
[23:13] <gnomefreak> asac: not sure maybe 4-5 minutes ago but ill will have meail open for a bit longer anyway
[23:13] <gnomefreak> it did?
[23:13] <asac> gnomefreak: you attached the .dsc and not a  diff ;)
[23:13] <gnomefreak> oh cool
[23:13] <gnomefreak> no
[23:13] <gnomefreak> oh shit
[23:14] <asac> yes ;)
[23:14] <asac> stay focussed :-P
[23:15] <fta> mozilla 485052
[23:15] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 485052 in Security: PSM "Embed a list of default OCSP Responder URLs for certain CAs" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485052
[23:15] <fta> "We need the upcoming NSS 3.12.3 release."
[23:16] <gnomefreak> this time it said debdiff and i opened it from email compose window and its right god i hope its right
[23:17] <fta> mozilla 486182
[23:17] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 486182 in Security: PSM "Land NSS 3.12.3 final in mozilla-central (the experimental firefox trunk)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486182
[23:27]  * gnomefreak wonders if its that easy for LP too
[23:29] <asac> fta: yeah. i think we will get that everywhere
[23:38] <gnomefreak> there sent her another email
[23:39] <gnomefreak> ok good debian got the debdiff, now lets see if i cant get patches oved over and built
[23:50] <gnomefreak> asac: what is the name of the arm arch? i cant recall spelling
[23:50] <asac> armel
[23:51] <gnomefreak> ah good think i had e m mixed up
[23:51] <gnomefreak> thanks