[08:41] <Unggnu> hi all
[08:44] <Unggnu> bryce_:  This bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348428 is already fixed through disabling a previous patch but upstream has now released a libdrm patch for it so ?
[08:49] <bryce> Unggnu: good catch, that's the one jesse was working on today based on our work?
[08:50] <bryce> btw, regarding the wiki links that have spaces in them, usually when I run into such situations I take it as a clue that the section I'm linking to might need to be broken out into its own separate page.
[08:50] <Unggnu> Yes in apply to our report afaik
[08:50] <bryce> unless there's problems with what we've changed, given we have only 1 day before final freeze, I'd leave it as is
[08:51] <Unggnu> ok :)
[08:51] <Unggnu> But the xv vt patch does make it?
[08:51] <bryce> which one?
[08:52] <Unggnu> According to the wiki: Makes sense but some passages are small but practical like the description how to use the Apport crash message
[08:52] <Unggnu> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/345796
[08:52] <Unggnu> oh
[08:52] <Unggnu> :)
[08:52] <Unggnu> Why fixed released?
[08:53] <Unggnu> Hm, maybe ubottu reads the upstream report
[08:53] <Unggnu> The patch is http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24880952/119_fix_vt_switch.patch
[08:53] <bryce> yes, I'll look at 345796 tomorrow, I think that should make it
[08:54] <Unggnu> thx
[08:54] <bryce> basically anything assigned to me, or targeted to jaunty, or milestoned to 9.04 still could make it in, either pre-release, or during final freeze, or even as an SRU
[08:54] <bryce> _could_ :-)
[08:54] <Unggnu> With it INtel seems quite stable atm
[08:54] <bryce> ahh, now that's awesome to hear finally!
[08:54] <Unggnu> Yeah, with Exa of course :)
[08:54] <bryce> I'm glad the last couple weeks have seen a lot of -intel fixes
[08:55] <Unggnu> I hope that UXA stays for a while
[08:55] <Unggnu> so it gets stable :)
[08:55] <bryce> "stays for a while"?  You mean stays off by default?
[08:55] <Unggnu> no, that they don't invent ZXA shortly after :)
[08:56] <bryce> hehehe
[08:57] <Unggnu> They are really fast with their bug fixing but they also push things to fast forward. E.g. I still need the Overlay-X option to get a decent video experience.
[08:58] <bryce> I totally agree
[08:58] <bryce> we need to be more aggressive at pushing bugs upstream to them, to slow them down :-)
[08:59] <Unggnu> yeah but probably won't help :-D
[08:59] <bryce> ah, it might
[09:00] <Unggnu> They should use launchpad for bug reporting. It is so easy then to push it upstream :)
[09:00] <Unggnu> Like hplip
[09:00] <bryce> yeah I know
[09:00] <Unggnu> two clicks actually
[09:00] <bryce> for Inkscape, we use launchpad both for the project, and for the project in Ubuntu, and it makes bug management so easy
[09:01] <bryce> now if only Inkscape used bzr so it was easier to cherrypick patches ;-)
[09:01] <Unggnu> :)
[09:01] <Unggnu> Maybe there will be a wrapper script someday
[16:46] <tseliot> federico1: ping
[18:10] <federico1> tseliot: hey
[18:10] <tseliot> federico1: news on you know what? ;)
[18:10] <federico1> tseliot: I was reviewing your patch for #568160, then got caught up with something else
[18:10] <tseliot> ok
[18:10] <federico1> I'm on it now
[18:11] <tseliot> federico1: great, let me know if there's something which is not clear or which should be improved
[18:11] <federico1> sure
[18:55]  * jbarnes looks for manoj
[18:57] <federico1> tseliot: made some stylistic changes to your patch; I'm building it now to test it...
[18:58] <federico1> (you got caught by the pesky four-space tabs in that file...)
[18:58] <bryce> jbarnes: callsign 'manjo'.  I pinged him on our internal IRC to come here.
[18:59] <bryce> jbarnes: here he comes
[18:59] <jbarnes> cool thanks
[18:59] <jbarnes> manjo: just wondering about the sun java crash
[18:59] <manjo> bryce_, 
[18:59] <manjo> jbarnes, yes
[18:59] <jbarnes> lp 337608, fdo 20739
[19:00] <manjo> jbarnes, will test now and confirm 
[19:00] <jbarnes> great thanks
[19:01] <manjo> be in a bit .. I am chowing down my lunch as fast as I can 
[19:01] <manjo> jbarnes, thanks for pointing me to it 
[19:01] <jbarnes> manjo: np, just trying to close all my ubuntu bugs upstream ;)
[19:02]  * bryce hugs jbarnes
[19:02] <jbarnes> heh
[19:03] <manjo> no love for me for finding it ? 
[19:04] <manjo> jbarnes, upgrading now will test as soon as its done and post results on both bugs
[19:04]  * jbarnes shoots the messenger
[19:04] <jbarnes> manjo: great
[19:04]  * manjo thinks that is not a bug he will die for ... try again
[19:14]  * bryce hugs manjo
[19:16] <jbarnes> hehe
[19:16] <jbarnes> hugs >> bullets to the head
[19:19] <federico1> tseliot: committed to svn now - thanks for working on this :)
[19:19] <tseliot> federico1: yes, I know, I used to code a lot in Python (hence the four-space tabs set in my IDE)
[19:19] <tseliot> federico1: thanks :-)
[19:31] <manjo> bryce, jbarnes sorry bad news
[19:32] <manjo> bryce, jbarnes it still crashes
[19:32] <jbarnes> oh no
[19:32] <jbarnes> manjo: what bits exactly?
[19:32] <jbarnes> 2.6.28-11-generic & the 2.6.3 driver package?
[19:35] <manjo> ii  xserver-xorg-video-intel                   2:2.6.3-0ubuntu8    
[19:36] <manjo> 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
[19:36] <manjo> latest jaunty kernel
[19:37] <jbarnes> hm
[19:37] <jbarnes> just going to the test page w/firefox & scrolling right?
[19:37] <manjo> yes
[19:37] <jbarnes> ok I'll try again
[19:38] <manjo> I wil leave the bug as is you want me to comment ? 
[19:40] <manjo> jbarnes, I can see this is a nasty one 
[19:40] <jbarnes> could you add your version info to it so I don't lose it?
[19:41] <manjo> done 
[19:42] <jbarnes> thanks
[19:44] <jbarnes> manjo: yeah I think there's something funky going on with exa in this case
[19:45] <jbarnes> I have a patch that *might* fix things but I want to reproduce it so I can be sure
[19:45] <manjo> ok. do you know of any other website with embedded java applet I can test with ? 
[19:45] <manjo> may be this applet does bad things ? 
[19:46]  * manjo thinking out loud
[19:46] <manjo> ah but the correct behaviour is for the browser to crash not the xserver right ? 
[19:46] <jbarnes> yeah definitely :)
[19:47] <jbarnes> even if java is abusive we should at worst kill the app
[19:47] <jbarnes> wow that was fast...
[19:47] <jbarnes> just crashed it, I wonder if the earlier version of xf86-video-intel I tested with was ok but this one is broken?
[19:47] <jbarnes> hm
[19:48] <bryce> stealth patch ;-)