bdmurray | jgoguen: doesn't everything lose data when you hd is full? | 00:04 |
---|---|---|
bdmurray | jgoguen: okay, I read the report ;-) | 00:04 |
jgoguen | bdmurray: not everything gets data corruption when the HDD is full though, and the interactive things should allow you to save elsewhere | 00:05 |
jgoguen | bdmurray: admittedly, thunderbird isn't interactive that way :) and I don't know what else it could do for POP3... | 00:05 |
bdmurray | it'd be good to test it in Jaunty | 00:06 |
jgoguen | bdmurray: ok...do you think High is right then? When I get a chance, I'll create a Thunderbird profile on a nearly-full partition and see if I can reproduce | 00:07 |
bdmurray | jgoguen: yes, at least high | 00:07 |
jgoguen | Critical if it still exists? | 00:08 |
bdmurray | jgoguen: perhaps | 00:08 |
jgoguen | bdmurray: ok...I'm going to an exam in a bit, I'll come ask about it once I get a chance to test and see just what happens | 00:09 |
bdmurray | jgoguen: oh, if its not fixed upstream its unlikely to be fixed in Jaunty ;-) | 00:11 |
* jgoguen looks again | 00:11 | |
jgoguen | heh :) | 00:11 |
jgoguen | wonder if it's been fixed in Thunderbird 3 since Jan 11...I've seen at least one other bug, either there or in GNOME, that's fixed but not marked fixed | 00:13 |
bdmurray | Yeah, it would be good to know for sure | 00:14 |
jgoguen | is there a PPA for Thunderbird 3 builds? it's failing for me right now, apparently GCC doesn't follow the C++ standard for temporary object destruction... | 00:14 |
jgoguen | as of gcc-4.3 | 00:14 |
bdmurray | The mozillateam does not have one | 00:16 |
jgoguen | ok...I have to run now, either late tonight when I get home or sometime tomorrow I'll install gcc 4.2 and compile Thunderbird 3 and test | 00:17 |
bdmurray | Does anybody hear the logout sound? bug 253763 | 00:49 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 253763 in pulseaudio "Schedule pulseaudio to terminate last at logout. Logout sound doesn't... sound" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/253763 | 00:49 |
dtchen | i thought a decision was made to not play any logout sound | 00:50 |
dtchen | IIRC, part of the TearDown spec? | 00:50 |
bdmurray | I don't see anything in that spec | 00:55 |
=== stooj is now known as StooJ | ||
dtchen | bdmurray: i don't know offhand if the logout sound is *supposed* to be played. perhaps one of keybuk, pitti, or mdz would know. | 05:19 |
=== lacqui_ is now known as lacqui | ||
YoBoY | good morning | 06:49 |
=== scott_ev is now known as OfficialGreeter | ||
=== OfficialGreeter is now known as scott_ev | ||
davmor2 | Guys is there anywhere special to report translation bug to or is it just on the normal ubuntu bug tracker | 09:09 |
YoBoY | davmor2: better to go to the translation page of the package to make your proposition of correction and send a mail to the maintener of the translation | 09:14 |
davmor2 | YoBoY: thanks | 09:15 |
efraser | Hello guys | 09:43 |
efraser | I've got a bug when using dual head DVI on a dell docking station with a Dell Lattitude E4300, but I'm not sure what to file the bug against. | 09:44 |
efraser | Or to search against. | 09:44 |
efraser | Basically xrandr is messing up when it configures the monitors when you login. | 09:46 |
efraser | nm, I've found the guides on reporting bugs. | 09:56 |
YoBoY | efraser: hi, you can beggin your jorney by reading this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Debugging | 09:56 |
efraser | cheers, that's what I'm doing :) | 09:56 |
james_w | it's bug day today people! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20090409 | 10:07 |
james_w | feel free to ask about anything you are unsure about how to deal with | 10:07 |
james_w | the idea today is to do two things, remove the "patch" flag from attachments that aren't patches so the flag becomes more useful | 10:08 |
james_w | and to move the patches that are there closer to being integrated in to the package, so that we can fix bugs or add features. | 10:09 |
efraser | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/358315 | 10:34 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 358315 in xorg "[jaunty] intel xrandr dual head auto config only configures part of one screen on Dell Lattitude E4300" [Undecided,New] | 10:34 |
efraser | Yeah, thats me. | 10:35 |
efraser | I'm not troubled by the bug really, but it has been there since I started using Jaunty, so I figure I should report it before jaunty goes live. | 10:35 |
miki4242 | hi all, should a debdiff always include a new changelog entry describing the fix? | 10:36 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
miki4242 | example in Bugs/Patches on wiki doesn't have one | 10:40 |
TheHobbit | hi | 10:41 |
TheHobbit | I'm working on bug 321688. The bug could be better solved by upgrading the package to the new upstream release, should I? | 10:42 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 321688 in liblocale-maketext-lexicon-perl "Broken argument parsing in Lexicon::import()." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/321688 | 10:42 |
TheHobbit | hmmm I need some clarification on policy.... The bug I'm hugging now is solved upstream in a new release. Moreover, jaunty already has the new release solving the bug, thus the problem only stays for intrepid... | 11:24 |
TheHobbit | what is the right thing to do? bring the new release in intrepid or patch the old one? | 11:25 |
james_w | miki4242: a debdiff should generally, yes | 11:25 |
miki4242 | thanks | 11:26 |
james_w | miki4242: it's not usually crucial, but having it makes proper attribution easier | 11:26 |
miki4242 | ok. | 11:28 |
james_w | TheHobbit: hi, I don't see the reference in the upstream changelog, which version fixes it? | 11:29 |
miki4242 | after lunch i'll work on espeak/portaudio bugs which are quite a problem for accessible ubuntu. any help greatly appreciated. | 11:30 |
TheHobbit | james_w: I did not download all the releases, but 0.77 has it cleaned... The fact that is not in the changelog does not surprise me... | 11:31 |
james_w | why's that? | 11:31 |
TheHobbit | is such a blunder, I wouldn't like to have it remembered each time someone opens the changelog:D | 11:31 |
james_w | ok, I see it now | 11:32 |
james_w | so, as this is fixed in Jaunty it should be marked "Fix Released" | 11:33 |
TheHobbit | ok, but what for intrepid? | 11:33 |
james_w | but we know this affects Intrepid, so we should decide whether it is appropriate to fix there | 11:33 |
james_w | we need to weigh up the impact of the problem, against the potential for regression | 11:34 |
TheHobbit | ok, I just found it | 11:34 |
TheHobbit | is solved in release 0.67 of the upstream package | 11:34 |
james_w | cool, thanks | 11:34 |
TheHobbit | that is just the release after the one that is in intrepid | 11:35 |
TheHobbit | I do not think that upgrading to 0.67 should pose any regression problems... just a sec | 11:35 |
james_w | there seems to be little potential for regression, except that something may be relying on the fact that it only accepts odd numbers of arguments | 11:35 |
james_w | we can check what packages depend on that one using "apt-cache rdepends" | 11:36 |
james_w | so there are a few | 11:36 |
TheHobbit | yes, so there are... I'm looking for changes in the 0.67 wrt 0.66 | 11:41 |
TheHobbit | hu? | 11:43 |
TheHobbit | in the 0.66 version on cpan there is no bug!!!! | 11:44 |
TheHobbit | either the developper put on cpan two 0.66 versions, or the matainer had a problem somewhere | 11:45 |
james_w | I can't see it in the Intrepid version either | 11:48 |
TheHobbit | mee too, I'm sorry, I was wrong | 11:49 |
TheHobbit | :( | 11:49 |
james_w | it was fixed in ubuntu with the upload of 0.62-1 | 11:49 |
TheHobbit | yes, i saw | 11:50 |
TheHobbit | i'm correctin my blunder | 11:50 |
james_w | dapper, gutsy and hardy are then affected, but nothing after | 11:50 |
TheHobbit | thus? should be 'confirmed'? | 11:51 |
james_w | nope, still "Fix Released" | 11:51 |
james_w | the status tracks the development release | 11:51 |
james_w | we can add a bug task for earlier releases if we want to fix it there | 11:52 |
TheHobbit | hmmm | 11:52 |
TheHobbit | if someone ask for it... | 11:53 |
TheHobbit | I'm closing it on the hugday page too | 11:56 |
TheHobbit | well, a closed bug before lunch, and after I'll tag another;) | 11:58 |
TheHobbit | at least being unemployed will produce something | 11:58 |
TheHobbit | see you later | 11:58 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== Brownout_ is now known as Brownout | ||
TheHobbit | hi | 13:55 |
TheHobbit | I'm looking into bug 176862, proble is: the patch attached is a diff against the whole tree, almost a debdiff, for a old release of the package | 14:07 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 176862 in gworldclock "unsorted country list" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176862 | 14:07 |
TheHobbit | moreover the package has no patches for now, so I should choose a patch handler (I'm only familiar with dpatch,,,,) | 14:08 |
james_w | TheHobbit: that patch appears to be a debdiff to me | 14:10 |
TheHobbit | yes, but against an old release | 14:10 |
james_w | when there is no patch system already then we typically do not add one for packages which originate from Debian | 14:10 |
james_w | ah | 14:10 |
TheHobbit | moreover, I thought that patches should be in the debian/patches, not idden in the diff.gz | 14:11 |
TheHobbit | +h | 14:11 |
james_w | that's what I was saying | 14:12 |
TheHobbit | I have some doubt about the patch, by the way.... | 14:12 |
james_w | if there is no patch system already then we don't generally add one, as that can cause issues with merging from Debian | 14:12 |
TheHobbit | it solves the proiblem yes | 14:12 |
james_w | so in this case it would be ok | 14:12 |
TheHobbit | but only for english speaking people:D | 14:12 |
james_w | also, it's only a tiny bit old, so it should be easy to update it to apply to the new version | 14:13 |
james_w | heh :-) | 14:13 |
TheHobbit | yes it is easy, just modify the files :) | 14:13 |
TheHobbit | debian has a related bug, #167339 | 14:14 |
TheHobbit | which asks for displaying the country codes too | 14:14 |
TheHobbit | anyhow, I can adapt the patch and upload a debdiff against current release | 14:15 |
TheHobbit | should I? | 14:15 |
james_w | that would be great | 14:15 |
james_w | also, if you could forward it to Debian it would be even better | 14:15 |
james_w | it appears the author is also the Debian maintainer, so it's two birds with one stone doing that | 14:15 |
TheHobbit | what? the debdiff or the bug report? or both? | 14:15 |
james_w | both please | 14:16 |
TheHobbit | hmmm I'll be back for direction about how to do it... | 14:16 |
james_w | plus, adding the note about the sponsors to the Ubuntu bug so that the reporter might know about that next time would be triple good | 14:16 |
TheHobbit | who's the sponsor? | 14:16 |
hggdh | what should be done on patches that change Makefile.am? | 14:17 |
james_w | TheHobbit: the sponsors team | 14:17 |
james_w | ah, I thought that was on the Bugs/Patches page | 14:18 |
james_w | hggdh: they are tricky. It sometimes depends on the package | 14:18 |
james_w | hggdh: generally though a sponsor should be able to do the necessary things with it, as it is often easier for them to do it themselves than review a patch that includes autotools changes. | 14:19 |
TheHobbit | you mean subscribing the ubuntu-(main|universe)-sponsors to the bug james_w ? | 14:19 |
hggdh | james_w, yes... I would really not need to run autotools in the build | 14:19 |
james_w | hggdh: mentioning that "Makefile.am" is changed along with the patch would be good though | 14:19 |
james_w | hggdh: plus, check debian/rules, some packages already run it there | 14:19 |
hggdh | james_w, thanks | 14:20 |
james_w | TheHobbit: yeah, but also add a comment explaining that that is what you are doing, and that if they attach a patch they should do the same thing | 14:20 |
TheHobbit | I'll do it... | 14:20 |
james_w | thank you | 14:20 |
TheHobbit | is universe by the way in this case | 14:21 |
TheHobbit | I'll be back | 14:21 |
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
TheHobbit | hu..... being an ubuntu patch, should I change debian/control too? | 14:28 |
savvas | TheHobbit: update-maintainer usually does the trick :) | 14:29 |
TheHobbit | savvas: thanks... | 14:29 |
savvas | np | 14:30 |
TheHobbit | sorry, but I'm new to this game:D | 14:30 |
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
TheHobbit | hmmm something does not work as expected... | 14:47 |
TheHobbit | must dwell a litle bit deeper | 14:47 |
TheHobbit | apparently the patch is not enough.... :s | 14:55 |
* TheHobbit kicks himself in the ass.... stupid stupid stupid:D | 15:09 | |
bddebian | Boo | 15:11 |
BUGabundo | foo | 15:12 |
TheHobbit | ok, now I have the right debdiff... I'm going to do the amministrative work, only I would like to know how to notify debian (And upstream being the same...) | 15:14 |
TheHobbit | by the way.... | 15:22 |
TheHobbit | having posted a debdiff, should I set the status to fix-released or something? Or should it stay 'confirmed'? | 15:22 |
james_w | confirmed is fine | 15:23 |
james_w | having the sponsors subscribed is the important bit | 15:23 |
TheHobbit | that's done | 15:23 |
james_w | and not closing the bug, so "Fix Released" would actually be bad | 15:23 |
james_w | cool :-) | 15:23 |
TheHobbit | now about notifying upstream...? | 15:24 |
james_w | and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/Bugs should help with forwarding to Debian | 15:24 |
TheHobbit | reading it.... | 15:26 |
TheHobbit | just a question.... when it is said that the debdiff generated by submittodebian can be edited, is to remove specific ubuntu things? Like the update-mainatiner thing? | 15:42 |
james_w | exactly | 15:51 |
bdmurray | james_w: How's it going? | 15:57 |
james_w | hey bdmurray | 15:58 |
james_w | pretty good, how are you? | 15:58 |
bdmurray | good, I was looking at bug 176862 which TheHobbit was working and part of the changelog has been modified is that alright? | 15:58 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 176862 in gworldclock "unsorted country list" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176862 | 15:59 |
TheHobbit | bdmurray: modified by me you mean? | 15:59 |
bdmurray | TheHobbit: yeah the removed obsolete variables from changelog bit | 16:00 |
TheHobbit | hu.... | 16:00 |
TheHobbit | that was the Local variable part | 16:00 |
TheHobbit | I could add them again... | 16:00 |
TheHobbit | :) | 16:01 |
bdmurray | TheHobbit: right, I'm not sure modifying the changelog is the right thing to do and wanted to check w/ someone else | 16:01 |
bdmurray | I mean its not worth carrying a diff from Debian for | 16:01 |
TheHobbit | I was asking myself the same thing... | 16:02 |
TheHobbit | bdmurray: I'll wait to notify upstream then.... | 16:03 |
TheHobbit | these variables are mode setting for some text editor or other I think | 16:04 |
bdmurray | james_w: ? | 16:07 |
james_w | yeah, harmless, but discouraged | 16:07 |
james_w | if there's no effect on the package then it's not worth diverging from Debian | 16:07 |
TheHobbit | thus I'm back to generate a debdiff then.. | 16:07 |
TheHobbit | ok, learning is made through doing the wrong thing and starting over | 16:08 |
TheHobbit | as my grandmother was fond to say | 16:08 |
james_w | indeed :-) | 16:08 |
exosyst | Can anyone verify some odd behaviour after the last intrepid update? | 16:09 |
bdmurray | james_w: once he's got that done what do we need to do to get it in? | 16:09 |
james_w | at the moment it would need motu-release approval | 16:10 |
thekorn | woohoo, happy hugday everybody ;) | 16:31 |
TheHobbit | ok, now the debdiff is minimal........ | 16:31 |
TheHobbit | should I notify upstream? | 16:31 |
TheHobbit | james_w: ? | 16:34 |
TheHobbit | must go... | 16:38 |
bdmurray | TheHobbit: Thanks for helping out! | 16:38 |
TheHobbit | bdmurray: no problem:) | 16:39 |
TheHobbit | 'till next week I've time | 16:39 |
bdmurray | james_w: I've a question about the patch tagging guidelines | 17:00 |
james_w | shoot | 17:00 |
bdmurray | So in a dpatch patch it says: | 17:01 |
bdmurray | ## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. | 17:01 |
bdmurray | So is ## DP: Ubuntu: url appropriate? | 17:01 |
james_w | I think so, yes | 17:03 |
bdmurray | james_w: okay, I wasn't sure if it was redundant. Is there somebody else to checkw with I'd like to update the wiki page too | 17:09 |
james_w | bdmurray: I'm not sure that there is | 17:14 |
james_w | I think the DP: lines are there to mark the description so that tools could parse them out | 17:14 |
james_w | I don't see why the links shouldn't be part of the description, their valuable information | 17:15 |
bdmurray | My question was whether or not is should be ## DP: Ubuntu: url vs ## Ubuntu: url | 17:15 |
james_w | yeah | 17:21 |
bdmurray | Can anybody recreate bug 346474? I can't on Jaunty | 17:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 346474 in imagemagick "ImageMagick interprets PGM header incorrectly" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/346474 | 17:21 |
Pici | bdmurray: I cannot either. | 17:23 |
bdmurray | okay the source code looks a bit different too | 17:23 |
=== fader_ is now known as fader|lunch | ||
=== Ampelbein is now known as Ampelbein_ | ||
=== Ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein | ||
=== fader|lunch is now known as fader_ | ||
HammerHead66 | can anyone help me with the BugDay/Tools this is my first time and I'm vary new to Linux | 18:36 |
HammerHead66 | I get this error when installing it E: Couldn't find package ubuntu-qa-tools | 18:37 |
bdmurray | HammerHead66: what release are you on? | 18:38 |
HammerHead66 | 8.04 64bit Gnome | 18:39 |
bdmurray | And where did you find the bugday tools? | 18:39 |
HammerHead66 | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Tools ran it in terminal "sudo apt-get install ubuntu-qa-tools" | 18:40 |
bdmurray | ah, okay ubuntu-qa-tools is only available in Jaunty | 18:40 |
HammerHead66 | lol ok that's why it won't work. | 18:41 |
HammerHead66 | so those tools are only for jaunty do they have any tolls for 8.04? | 18:42 |
HammerHead66 | *tools | 18:42 |
bdmurray | the tools will work in Hardy its just a bit harder to set them up | 18:43 |
=== savvas is now known as Euaki | ||
=== Euaki is now known as savvas | ||
HammerHead66 | bdmurray: I'll try if your willing to help me | 18:51 |
bdmurray | HammerHead66: You don't really *need* the tools to particpate your time might be better spent participating rather than setting up tools. | 18:54 |
HammerHead66 | ok | 18:54 |
efefppo | Has the google calendar bug in evoluition been fixed? | 19:40 |
bdmurray | Can anybody recreate bug 342332? | 19:51 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 342332 in vlc "vlc crashes with SIGABRT at startup or when "Show Playlist" is clicked" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/342332 | 19:51 |
bdmurray | I'm having a hard time of it | 19:51 |
imachine | helllo! | 20:17 |
imachine | http://paste.ubuntu.com/147849/ <-nvidia 71 fails to build @ 8.10 | 20:17 |
imachine | any ideas? | 20:17 |
HammerHead66 | imachine: see im | 20:44 |
imachine | HammerHead66, that was a bunch of bloat I couldn't see through sorry | 20:45 |
imachine | irssi doesn't autocreate chat windows for me | 20:45 |
imachine | HammerHead66, also, I don't think it has to do with any of that. it looks upstream. | 20:46 |
imachine | first it couldn't find semaphore.h (looked in asm/), I symlinked it from linux/ | 20:46 |
imachine | then it just failed | 20:46 |
imachine | http://paste.ubuntu.com/147849/ | 20:46 |
imachine | like this | 20:46 |
HammerHead66 | imachine: ERROR: Kernel configuration is invalid."; this is the error you are getting so it has to do with drivers... at lest that's what I think. But I may be wrong | 20:54 |
imachine | HammerHead66, you get that with every driver build through DKMS, at least with the other ones that work noprobs. | 20:58 |
imachine | it's a standard error one can somewhat ignore. | 20:58 |
HammerHead66 | I don't have it on mine | 20:59 |
imachine | nvidia setup just seems to be overly cautious. | 20:59 |
imachine | explain | 20:59 |
imachine | what version of nvidia do you run? | 20:59 |
HammerHead66 | did you try what I im you? | 20:59 |
imachine | send it again please | 20:59 |
imachine | it went out all rubbish since irssi doesn't auto-open im windows here for me. | 21:00 |
imachine | I've opened a query now | 21:00 |
imachine | right | 21:00 |
imachine | :-) | 21:00 |
imachine | dude what you wrote is for ati | 21:01 |
imachine | what the hel | 21:01 |
HammerHead66 | did it work? | 21:01 |
imachine | it's for another card. | 21:01 |
HammerHead66 | it will work for all cards | 21:02 |
* imachine fails | 21:02 | |
imachine | riiight; | 21:02 |
imachine | anyone else? | 21:02 |
HammerHead66 | if you don't try it your just showing how much you don't want to try something that someone is giving you that will work I hope you get it all worked out | 21:04 |
imachine | cheers | 21:06 |
IntuitiveNipple | imachine: just looked at your original pastebin report. Where did the dkms package come from? | 21:09 |
imachine | IntuitiveNipple, apt | 22:11 |
imachine | IntuitiveNipple, it's standard package from apt. | 22:11 |
imachine | 8,10 | 22:11 |
imachine | IntuitiveNipple, I did dpkg-reconfigure nvidia-71-kernel-source or whatever it's called | 22:15 |
imachine | and during dkms module build, it failed. | 22:15 |
imachine | I think it's upstream, since it fails to build with nvidia-installer with .run file from NVIDIA.com | 22:16 |
imachine | I can provide that debug as well | 22:16 |
imachine | but not now since that pc is off and people sleep in the same room it's in | 22:16 |
IntuitiveNipple | imachine: There are plenty of reports about that issue from a Google search. It seems the problem is the kernel changed the definition of some functions and Nvidia didn't update some driver packages | 22:16 |
imachine | yes, very likely | 22:17 |
imachine | like I said, it's upstream 99$ | 22:17 |
imachine | 99% | 22:17 |
imachine | tho, it's a bug nonetheless and should be reported, so that it at least gets marked as upstream/won't fix | 22:17 |
imachine | :-) | 22:17 |
imachine | I'll browse laucnhpad later for it; the bigger problem is that nvidia 96 which should work is broken. | 22:17 |
imachine | it displays RGB not as RGB but as GBR | 22:18 |
imachine | ;p | 22:18 |
IntuitiveNipple | This may help: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=120971 | 22:20 |
IntuitiveNipple | what video chip-set is that? | 22:20 |
imachine | gf3 ti | 22:21 |
IntuitiveNipple | 96.x.x displays as GBR? | 22:22 |
imachine | yes | 22:23 |
imachine | on DVI | 22:23 |
imachine | works fine on VGA | 22:23 |
imachine | it's a known issue | 22:24 |
imachine | http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=106496 | 22:24 |
imachine | that's what I have | 22:25 |
imachine | seems it's not just GF3 | 22:25 |
imachine | I'd gladly use 71x | 22:25 |
imachine | but they fail to build :) | 22:25 |
IntuitiveNipple | What's connected to the DVI? | 22:25 |
imachine | a monitor | 22:31 |
imachine | 20" dell | 22:31 |
imachine | works fine on window$ | 22:32 |
imachine | works fine with nv on linux | 22:32 |
IntuitiveNipple | I was wondering if the nvidia xorg.conf EDID over-rides might help so you can set the parameters manually | 22:32 |
imachine | what might help me is turning off VGA | 22:33 |
IntuitiveNipple | ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/96.43.11/README/appendix-d.html | 22:34 |
imachine | because I think it's the fact that the card falsly keeps both outputs on, and therefore corruption comes up | 22:34 |
IntuitiveNipple | There's an IgnoreDisplayDevices option that may help | 22:34 |
IntuitiveNipple | also possibly ExactModeTimingsDVI if you over-ride EDID | 22:35 |
imachine | its not EDID, I think | 22:35 |
imachine | there's no errors in xorg.0.log | 22:35 |
imachine | it used to work on older drivers | 22:35 |
imachine | and if I killed and restarted X a few times, it worked fine | 22:36 |
imachine | so I'm guessing it's some nasty nvidia issue that makes it pick up both outputs at once. | 22:36 |
IntuitiveNipple | From what I've read though, the driver is not using the provided EDID info correctly, so over-riding it could help | 22:36 |
imachine | and it should not. | 22:36 |
imachine | I'll check it out later tomorrow, thanks | 22:36 |
imachine | it's tomorrow in 20 minutes over here anyway | 22:36 |
imachine | and I guess I should be off | 22:36 |
imachine | so lates! and thanks for the hints. | 22:36 |
imachine | I'll report back later | 22:37 |
IntuitiveNipple | the other one is ModeValidation | 22:37 |
desavel | hi all | 22:44 |
BUGabundo | desavel: ehy | 22:44 |
desavel | what is Ubuntu? | 22:44 |
desavel | hm.........I feel myself lonely | 22:46 |
BUGabundo | humm | 22:48 |
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
bdmurray | Wooo, found a fixed bug | 23:16 |
BUGabundo | eheh | 23:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!