=== Keybuk is now known as Guest97642 | ||
=== Keybuk_ is now known as Keybuk | ||
dtchen | d'oh, it's an abi bump :( | 02:43 |
---|---|---|
=== k-s[AWAY] is now known as k-s | ||
=== lewis1202 is now known as boat1202 | ||
RAOF | How should I go about asking for the MMIO tracer to be enabled in an Ubuntu kernel somewhere, probably the kernel-ppa mainline builds or something? | 08:29 |
RAOF | It's not really a bug against any Ubuntu package... I suppose the kernel mailing list might be the goer. If no one here would like to say "oh, yeah. I'll do that" :). | 08:31 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== k-s is now known as k-s[AWAY] | ||
=== _Purple_ is now known as _Purple_away | ||
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
RainCT | (As a follow-up from two days ago, I installed Lenny -with default 2.6.26 amd64 kernel- and so far I haven't experienced any file system corruptions anymore.. I'll wait a bit more and then upgrade to a newer kernel) | 13:11 |
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
Kamping_Kaiser | hi all. um... should the page http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-generic exist? http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/linux-image-2.6.24-23-generic does but not the modules | 14:52 |
Kamping_Kaiser | might it not have been built for hardy{,-security}? | 14:56 |
maxb | rmadison knows about it | 15:04 |
maxb | linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-generic | 2.6.24-23.37 | hardy-updates | amd64, i386 | 15:04 |
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
Kamping_Kaiser | hm. not used rmadison before | 15:05 |
Kamping_Kaiser | why does it only exist in -updates not -security ? | 15:05 |
maxb | perhaps it wasn;t a security update? | 15:06 |
maxb | linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (2.6.24-23.37) hardy-proposed; urgency=low | 15:07 |
maxb | Right, just a normal SRU | 15:07 |
Kamping_Kaiser | i cant seem to find it in 'hardy' though, so what was it an update for? :| (apply cluebat if i'm missing something obvious btw) | 15:08 |
maxb | What do you mean "what was it an update for?" | 15:09 |
maxb | And why would you necessarily expect it to be in "hardy" ? | 15:09 |
Kamping_Kaiser | because i'd expect it to still be ther from before it was updated in -updates | 15:09 |
Kamping_Kaiser | i thought thats how the archive worke | 15:10 |
Kamping_Kaiser | d | 15:10 |
maxb | Aha | 15:10 |
maxb | The little fact you're missing is that the kernel ABI version is included in the binary package name. | 15:10 |
maxb | Thus, linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-generic should be considered as an update to linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-(some smaller number)-generic | 15:11 |
Kamping_Kaiser | i think i follow, but i'm going to sleep on it and reread in the morning to be sure. | 15:12 |
maxb | Or to put it another way: -updates are updates for the distribution as a whole - which in a few very specific circumstances can involve new binary package names. | 15:12 |
Kamping_Kaiser | to try and clarify this for me, does that mean linux-image-2.6.24-23-386 is only useful if you have -updates, because thats the only way to get corresponding linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-386 | 15:14 |
Kamping_Kaiser | maxb, sorry, i'm really off. thanks for the help, hopefully its clearer in the morning | 15:18 |
maxb | erm | 15:41 |
maxb | If the -23 ubuntu-modules is in -updates, but the -23 image is in -security, that's an error | 15:41 |
* maxb afk too now | 15:42 | |
mxboy15u1 | hello | 15:48 |
mxboy15u1 | anyone care to help with a atheros wireless issue? | 15:48 |
=== _Purple_away is now known as _Purple_ | ||
=== k-s[AWAY] is now known as k-s | ||
kees | maxb: it's in both places. | 17:36 |
kees | linux | 2.6.24-23.52 | file: hardy-security/main Sources | 17:36 |
kees | linux | 2.6.24-23.52 | file: hardy-updates/main Sources | 17:36 |
kees | oop, wrong package. hrm | 17:36 |
kees | maxb: looks like it's an old error, I'll get an archive admin to fix it. | 17:38 |
maxb | Right... "linux" being updated in -security but "linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24" not being on ABI 22 in -security is uh, bad, right? | 17:38 |
maxb | erm | 17:38 |
maxb | I mean "not being on ABI 23" | 17:38 |
kees | yeah, though it's been like that since the first time linux was bumped to -23. I'm checking the others.... | 17:38 |
maxb | Kamping_Kaiser: ^ There you have it: There is indeed a problem, thanks for noticing | 17:39 |
kees | I'm embarassed it took so long to figure that out. :( Looking at the USNs, it seems that I missed the ABI bump on Hardy in January. | 17:41 |
dtchen | is there anything in buildscripts.git to help automate that? | 17:42 |
dtchen | (since i began building test kernels, i've been updating the documentation to match actual practice, too) | 17:43 |
kees | dtchen: the buildscripts don't really have much knowledge of the archive; I'm adding a script to the archive tools to scream when it happens. | 18:35 |
=== maco_ is now known as maco | ||
kees | maxb, Kamping_Kaiser: hardy should be sane again on the next publisher cycle. sorry that took so long. | 22:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!