| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
| maco | does the lp api include a way to find out what date a bug was marked as a certain status? | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | LarstiQ, SamB: Both bzr-svn and bzr-git are coming RSN, IIRC. | 00:11 |
| wgrant | maco: date_$(some_status) on the bugtask. | 00:12 |
| wgrant | https://edge.launchpad.net/+apidoc/#bug_task | 00:12 |
| wgrant | The full activity log isn't exposed over the API, but those dates are stored separately. | 00:13 |
| maco | awesome. so i should theoretically be able to subtract the date reported from the date marked fix released and find out how long the bug was open? | 00:13 |
| wgrant | Yes. | 00:13 |
| Milosz | Hmm | 00:59 |
| Milosz | One more package just built in my PPA | 00:59 |
| Milosz | But it's not in the repository | 00:59 |
| Milosz | nvm | 01:05 |
| Milosz | one other question, the screenshots synaptic is able to get, where would I need to put one? | 01:05 |
| Milosz | It's only possible to register bazaar repositories with LaunchPad? | 02:22 |
| CarlFK | how long does it take between dput "Successfully uploaded packages." and it showing up on https://edge.launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive/ppa ? | 02:27 |
| CarlFK | "Pending 0" makes me nervous | 02:28 |
| Milosz | CarlFK, for me around 5 minutes | 02:28 |
| Milosz | don't be nervous :) | 02:28 |
| CarlFK | how about anxious? | 02:31 |
| CarlFK | i do recall seeing something about a lag | 02:32 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: Uploads are processed every 5 minutes - they will then show as Pending for up to 20 minutes. Once they change to Published, apt-get will be able to see them. | 02:38 |
| CarlFK | 5 and 20 min have come and gone, and I still don't see anything - here is my build and dput output: http://dpaste.com/32162/ | 03:00 |
| CarlFK | was I sposed to change something in .dput.cf ? I remember getting some notice a while ago.. month or 2 | 03:01 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: Pastebin your .dput.cf | 03:06 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: I see you had a similar problem about three months ago, but in that case the problem was that you weren't using the right key. | 03:06 |
| wgrant | That isn't the problem here :( | 03:07 |
| CarlFK | wgrant: http://dpaste.com/32164/ | 03:08 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: Try ~carlfk/ubuntu/ppa instead. | 03:08 |
| wgrant | But I doon't think it should be a silent reject if you leave off that last bit... | 03:08 |
| CarlFK | "Already uploaded to ppa.launchpad.net; Doing nothing for pdf417enc_4.4-ppa1_source.changes" | 03:08 |
| wgrant | dput -f | 03:09 |
| CarlFK | Successfully uploaded ... now I wait... | 03:10 |
| wgrant | Can you pastebin your changes file? (make sure it's unsigned, if you have upload rights to anywhere else) | 03:17 |
| CarlFK | wgrant: http://dpaste.com/32168/ | 03:22 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: The distribution is wrong (change that in debian/changelog), but that should get you an emailed rejection, not a silent one. | 03:23 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: You're not getting any email response at all? | 03:23 |
| CarlFK | correct | 03:24 |
| wgrant | Try fixing the distribution. | 03:24 |
| CarlFK | Successfully uploaded packages. | 03:29 |
| CarlFK | whew.. i before x:30 :) | 03:29 |
| === Snova_ is now known as Guest78048 | ||
| === Guest78048 is now known as Snova | ||
| CarlFK | wgrant: is my changelog right? http://dpaste.com/32170/ | 03:43 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: Yes. | 03:45 |
| === Snova_ is now known as Snova | ||
| wgrant | Although that version string is debatable, it's not technically wrong. | 03:46 |
| CarlFK | what's a better one? | 03:46 |
| wgrant | -0ppa1 is good, as it sorts below both official Ubuntu and Debian versions. | 03:47 |
| SamB | https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA suggests appending "~ppa<n>" | 03:51 |
| SamB | oh, after incrementing the last component of the preceding portion of the version number | 03:51 |
| dtchen | and best practices recommend actually using your LP id | 03:51 |
| dtchen | e.g., pulseaudio-0.9.14-0ubuntu100~crimsun1 | 03:52 |
| SamB | hmm. but doesn't that give precedence to versions packaged by people with names beginning with "z"? | 03:52 |
| dtchen | c sorts before z... | 03:53 |
| SamB | yeah, and doesn't a version number that sorts later take precence? | 03:53 |
| SamB | er. +de | 03:53 |
| dtchen | yes, but if pulseaudio-0.9.14-0ubuntu99 is in the archive, then uploading pulseaudio-0.9.14-0ubuntu100~crimsun1 is ok until pulseaudio-0.9.14-0ubuntu100 is uploaded, upon which ~crimsun1 is superceded | 03:54 |
| dtchen | (rather, it should be pulseaudio_0.9.14-0ubuntu99, but whatever) | 03:55 |
| SamB | I'm just teasing about what happens if you have foo-1.2-0ubuntu1~frotz and then someone comes along and makes foo-1.2-0ubuntu1~glulxe | 03:56 |
| dtchen | well either glulxe is an Evil Daemon and you have to battle to the death, or you can just not have glulxe's PPA in your sources.list(5) | 03:57 |
| wgrant | I use -XubuntuY~wgrant1 if I'm producing something that I know will be -XubuntuY in the primary archive. | 03:57 |
| CarlFK | doh.. just found a bunch of reject messages ... | 04:00 |
| wgrant | Heh. | 04:01 |
| CarlFK | Could not find suite 'ppa' | 04:01 |
| wgrant | I didn't think I saw any of the usual silent rejection candidates. | 04:01 |
| wgrant | Blah. | 04:01 |
| wgrant | ~carlfk/ppa/ubuntu | 04:01 |
| CarlFK | ha | 04:01 |
| wgrant | And all of the earlier uploads failed because they couldn't find a distroseries named 'unstable'? | 04:02 |
| CarlFK | yup | 04:02 |
| CarlFK | wgrant: "Rejected: Signer has no upload rights at all to this distribution. Not permitted to upload to the RELEASE pocket in a series in the 'CURRENT' state. " | 04:14 |
| CarlFK | incoming = ~<your_launchpad_id>/<ppa_name>/ubuntu/ | 04:15 |
| CarlFK | missing / maybe.. | 04:16 |
| === Andre_Gondim is now known as Andre_Gondim-afk | ||
| CarlFK | gah! | 04:17 |
| CarlFK | reject messages are out of sync with what I am doing | 04:18 |
| CarlFK | Rejected: pdf417enc_4.4-0ppa1.dsc: Section 'unknown' is not valid | 04:18 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: The RELEASE pocket error is because you uploaded to Ubuntu, not your PPA. | 04:18 |
| wgrant | Thee section one is legitimate, but will probably go away in a month or two. | 04:18 |
| CarlFK | Now running lintian... E: pdf417enc_4.4-0ppa2_source.changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file jaunty | 04:25 |
| CarlFK | W: pdf417enc source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/pdf417enc.doc-base.EX | 04:25 |
| CarlFK | anything I should do something about? | 04:25 |
| wgrant | That last one, yes. | 04:26 |
| wgrant | The former is lintian being outdated. | 04:26 |
| wgrant | You probably just want to remove the latter. | 04:27 |
| CarlFK | Where is the list of valid sections? | 04:42 |
| CarlFK | and why can't I make up my own... | 04:42 |
| CarlFK | so much for trying to outsmart it: pdf417enc_4.4-0ppa3.dsc: Section '-' is not valid | 04:51 |
| CarlFK | Pending 3 yay. | 04:58 |
| === ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
| wgrant | CarlFK: Where did that '3' come from? | 05:23 |
| wgrant | I don't recall seeing that last time I looked at a pending publishing. | 05:23 |
| CarlFK | 3 archs | 05:25 |
| CarlFK | dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgif.so.4 needed by debian/pdf417enc/usr/bin/pdf417prep (its RPATH is ''). | 05:26 |
| CarlFK | ah, -dev isn't libgif4 | 05:26 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: You know you can use something like pbuilder or sbuild to test locally, right? | 05:32 |
| CarlFK | kinda - it buit OK for i386, not sure why x64 has a problem | 05:48 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: I don't know why that's failing - do you have an amd64 machine on which to test? | 05:50 |
| * wgrant -> gone for a few minutes | 05:50 | |
| === gondim__ is now known as Andre_Gondim | ||
| CarlFK | wgrant: x64 box: | 06:07 |
| CarlFK | ls -l /usr/lib/libgif.so.4; lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2009-01-30 09:56 /usr/lib/libgif.so.4 -> libgif.so.4.1.6 | 06:07 |
| CarlFK | dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libgif.so.4 | 06:07 |
| CarlFK | but plain ol make clean && make works | 06:08 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: Which package owns libgif.so.4 there? | 06:09 |
| wgrant | And does it build in a pbuilder or sbuild? | 06:09 |
| CarlFK | pbuilder - I need to set that up on the x64 box. what is sbuild? | 06:15 |
| CarlFK | apt-file search libgif.so.4 (returned nothing?!) | 06:15 |
| wgrant | sbuild is what the buildds use, but its more common configurations require LVM so it's a bit more heavyweight. | 06:15 |
| CarlFK | ah, I guess i dont need to sudo the apt-file update | 06:24 |
| wgrant | gmb: I do like the new comment/change merging. | 06:24 |
| CarlFK | carl@dv67:~/temp/pdf417enc-4.4$ apt-file search libgif.so.4 | 06:25 |
| CarlFK | giflib-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgif.so.4.1.6 | 06:25 |
| CarlFK | libgif4: /usr/lib/libgif.so.4 | 06:25 |
| wgrant | CarlFK: Oops, I missed that second last line of yours - 'dpkg -S libgif.so.4' would have done it. | 06:25 |
| wgrant | Hmm. | 06:25 |
| wgrant | Well, I don't know. | 06:25 |
| CarlFK | im done for tonight... thanks for the help | 06:27 |
| wgrant | npp | 06:27 |
| wgrant | Gah. | 06:27 |
| wgrant | X seems to now be respecting GNOME's key repeat settings. | 06:28 |
| wgrant | It wasn't in Intrepid :( | 06:28 |
| seiflotfy1 | hi guys | 09:20 |
| seiflotfy1 | i did most of the zeitgeist wokr but my contact was set on seif@schroeder | 09:22 |
| seiflotfy1 | so non of the karma was given to me | 09:22 |
| seiflotfy1 | it was supposed to be seif@lotfy.com | 09:22 |
| seiflotfy1 | can i get the karma transfered | 09:22 |
| wgrant | seiflotfy1: I don't see any valid branches for zeitgeist - but anyway, you'd do better to ask on a weekday. | 09:28 |
| lifeless | seiflotfy1: just add the other address to your account, or merge your account | 09:29 |
| lifeless | s | 09:29 |
| seiflotfy1 | lp:gnome-zeitgeist | 09:29 |
| wgrant | Ah, gnome-zeitgeist. I was looking at plain zeitgeist, which seems to be a dupe. | 09:29 |
| wgrant | lifeless: It looks like it has a hostname rather than an FQDN... | 09:29 |
| lifeless | wgrant: ah | 09:30 |
| lifeless | seiflotfy1: or ask a question on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 09:30 |
| wgrant | A sysadmin could certainly do that without too much trouble, but IIRC historically they've said no. | 09:30 |
| seiflotfy1 | IIRC ? | 09:30 |
| wgrant | If I Recall Correctly. | 09:31 |
| lifeless | wgrant: actually, its not that easy :P | 09:31 |
| lifeless | there isn't a ui form to do it, so its a bunch of sql | 09:31 |
| wgrant | lifeless: The Person creation process does it, so it must be pretty easy. | 09:31 |
| wgrant | Oh, sure. | 09:31 |
| lifeless | wgrant: account joining is complex and automated, but this wouldn't be account joining if its nto a valid email | 09:31 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Right. | 09:32 |
| seiflotfy1 | problem is seif@schroeder is not an address | 09:34 |
| seiflotfy1 | its my account on my computer | 09:34 |
| seiflotfy1 | schroeder is my pc | 09:34 |
| wgrant | lifeless is most probably right: ask a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion, and somebody will fix it if they can. | 09:35 |
| === tiax` is now known as tiax | ||
| === gord_ is now known as gord | ||
| vikashkoushik | Hi guys | 12:31 |
| vikashkoushik | What is PPA in launch pad? | 12:32 |
| hyperair | vikashkoushik: http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=launchpad+ppa | 12:33 |
| Persi | hi, jaunty does a good job of preparing bug reports, and then it sends me to launchpad page, do I have to subscribe to a bug in order to report it? | 13:55 |
| geser | the reporter is automatically subscribed to a bug | 13:57 |
| Milosz | can I get my LP account renamed? | 13:58 |
| Milosz | my PPA is named after my email address already | 13:58 |
| Persi | well I press continue, then it asks me whether I want to subscribe to a "similar" bug, which is almost identical, so I thought it is a way to refine the report, isn`t it? | 13:58 |
| Milosz | the only thing that isn't is my LP account name, and I'd just like to get it renamed, if possible | 13:58 |
| Persi | or the report is filed when I press continue or even before reaching the LP? | 13:59 |
| geser | Persi: if a bug to your problem exist it's better if you subscribe to it (if you want to get notified about updates to the bug) instead of filing a new one | 14:00 |
| geser | you can also add comments to existing bugs (if it helps to resolve the bug) if you want (you don't need to be subscribed to the bug for it) | 14:01 |
| geser | for "common" problems it's not uncommon that someone else was faster with filing a bug | 14:02 |
| Persi | I see, but it probably doesn`t make sense to report for example crashing firefox due to same reasons as already reported, just in marginally different situation, as a separate report, ain`t it? So I imagine that before I reporter sends me to LP the bug is already counted somewhere and at LP I may subscribe to it only if I wish. Or is the number of reporters of the same bug actually important for anything? | 14:06 |
| Persi | wow I should be more concise | 14:06 |
| Milosz | Well I'd personally say 1 report of an installation of ten thousands could be randomflux | 14:23 |
| Milosz | so yes the number is probably important but I don't know whether it's important for the LP application | 14:23 |
| LarstiQ | Milosz: shouldn't you be able to change your account name yourself? | 14:43 |
| Milosz | LarstiQ, well my PPA is still called "PPA for deadchip" | 14:44 |
| Milosz | I'd just like this to be either my real name (PPA for Milosz Derezynski) or | 14:44 |
| Milosz | or the actual name of my PPA, "internalerror" (it's ~internalerror/ppa/ubuntu) | 14:44 |
| Milosz | I just think "PPA for deadchip" could be confusing for first-time visitors of my LP page | 14:45 |
| Milosz | they might think it's an app or somethig | 14:45 |
| Milosz | something* | 14:46 |
| Milosz | or first-time users of LP or PPAs | 14:46 |
| LarstiQ | Milosz: so change it then :) | 14:46 |
| Milosz | I can't | 14:46 |
| Milosz | oh | 14:46 |
| Milosz | yeah I can't | 14:46 |
| Milosz | I can only change the description | 14:47 |
| Milosz | is there anyone I could mail so this gets changed? | 14:47 |
| LarstiQ | Displayname? | 14:47 |
| LarstiQ | Milosz: https://edge.launchpad.net/~internalerror/+archive/ppa/+edit | 14:47 |
| Milosz | i set my display name to my realname | 14:48 |
| Milosz | but it still says "PPA for deadchip" | 14:48 |
| Milosz | ah | 14:48 |
| Milosz | edge is the beta interface? | 14:48 |
| LarstiQ | yeah | 14:48 |
| * LarstiQ disables redirection | 14:48 | |
| Milosz | cool thanks :) | 14:49 |
| LarstiQ | what, no? :) | 14:49 |
| LarstiQ | I'm just a user | 14:49 |
| LarstiQ | I'm disabling redirection for myself to check if the non-beta ui is different | 14:49 |
| Milosz | no thanks for pointing me to edge | 14:49 |
| Milosz | no, thanks* | 14:49 |
| LarstiQ | ah ok :) | 14:49 |
| Milosz | yeah in the non-beta you can not change the PPA name | 14:50 |
| Milosz | lol I guess that's not the only thing you wanted to see :P | 14:50 |
| LarstiQ | actually, it is | 14:50 |
| LarstiQ | Milosz: ok, so that seems to be it then | 14:51 |
| Milosz | Yes, LarstiQ, that is it. | 14:51 |
| Milosz | We will never see each other again. | 14:51 |
| Milosz | Goodbye. | 14:51 |
| Milosz | lol | 14:51 |
| Milosz | sorry just in a happny mood :) | 14:51 |
| Milosz | -n | 14:52 |
| Milosz | I understand if you don't join in | 14:52 |
| LarstiQ | :) | 14:52 |
| * LarstiQ is on a veeery slow link and preoccupied | 14:52 | |
| Milosz | :P | 14:53 |
| LarstiQ | I get the humor though :P | 14:54 |
| Milosz | :) | 14:54 |
| klbate | Quick question: Is there a command line tool for sending merge proposals? | 14:56 |
| * SamB wonders why https://bugs.launchpad.net/dosemu/+bugs doesn't either mention the use of an external bug tracker or show the bugs from it ... | 15:00 | |
| SamB | klbate: isn't that called "bzr send"? I guess it's not quite the same, though -- it sends a patch bundle ... | 15:01 |
| klbate | SamB: I'm not sure, I've just started using both bzr and Launchpad. | 15:02 |
| LarstiQ | SamB: send it to merge@code.launchpad.net and it i | 15:02 |
| SamB | though I saw evidence that it *used* to work for sending "merge proposals" in the form of a bug report ... | 15:02 |
| LarstiQ | SamB, klbate: http://theironlion.net/blog/2009/01/15/launchpad-code-reviews-without-browser/ | 15:02 |
| klbate | I'd like something that has exactly the same effect as a merge proposal submitted via the web. I suppose I could do something with wget, but if there's something else that works already... | 15:02 |
| klbate | LarstiQ: Thanks. | 15:02 |
| SamB | personally, I don't like the way merge proposals don't keep track of what commit you wanted merged | 15:03 |
| SamB | so if I make a merge proposal and then the thing I proposed to be merged gets merged some other way, the merge proposal sticks around | 15:03 |
| LarstiQ | without really knowing that part of launchpad, I'd say that is because you propsoe a branch for merging, not a revision | 15:04 |
| LarstiQ | SamB: really? | 15:04 |
| SamB | yeah, that's the bit I don't like | 15:04 |
| SamB | the fact that it's a branch, not a revision, that you propose ;-) | 15:04 |
| intellec` | SamB: that's pretty standard workflow for projects using dvcs | 15:04 |
| === intellec` is now known as intellectronica | ||
| intellectronica | SamB: when branching is so easy, you just create a new branch for every bit of work | 15:05 |
| LarstiQ | SamB: review feedback would be rather cumbersome otherwise | 15:05 |
| LarstiQ | SamB: but it sticking around forever doesn't sound right either | 15:06 |
| intellectronica | why not? it's sometimes useful for archaeology | 15:07 |
| exarkun | yea, keep it forever. | 15:08 |
| intellectronica | klbate: you can use the rest api (i think) | 15:09 |
| SamB | personally I have trouble sticking with branch topics :-( | 15:10 |
| intellectronica | SamB: there's nothing stopping you from developing in a single branch, then creating a new branch when you want to submit it. bzr makes it so easy and fast | 15:11 |
| SamB | it should stick around forever, but it should look more finished after the revision I meant is merged where I wanted it ;-) | 15:11 |
| SamB | intellectronica: yeah ... | 15:11 |
| intellectronica | SamB: i think that's a good idea. file a bug | 15:12 |
| LarstiQ | intellectronica: right, I meant ala Bunly Buggy merged status so that is out of my face for things to review | 15:17 |
| intellectronica | LarstiQ: ah, you mean on +activereviews? | 15:18 |
| intellectronica | you can get it out of there by reviewing it and marking it as "abstain", but i agree that it shouldn't be there once it's merged | 15:19 |
| jdub | hi all; trying to copy a new upstream package from hardy to jaunty in my ppa, and it's saying "same version already has published binaries..." | 15:19 |
| jdub | i've deleted the older (both upstream and ppa version) source packages... and it's still doing it | 15:20 |
| LarstiQ | jdub: are you copying a binary or source? | 15:21 |
| jdub | source | 15:22 |
| jdub | (https://launchpad.net/~jdub/+archive/ppa btw) | 15:22 |
| LarstiQ | jdub: what I've picked up from lurking (and guessing about underlying structure) is that sources are already in the same pool | 15:24 |
| LarstiQ | jdub: so that won't work, but you can copy the binary | 15:24 |
| * LarstiQ looks for a faq | 15:24 | |
| jdub | yeah, i read the launchpad help doco about it... didn't seem clear | 15:25 |
| jdub | "copy existing binaries" doesn't really sound like "rebuild the current sources for this series" | 15:25 |
| LarstiQ | indeed | 15:26 |
| jdub | but "rebuild the copied sources" sounds almost right... aside from the single pool context | 15:26 |
| jdub | i thought i was missing a changelog hack, but other ppas don't seem to do anything weird with it | 15:26 |
| jdub | guess i'll try the binary option and see how spectacularly it breaks :D | 15:27 |
| jdub | zomg, that totally looks like it's done the wrong thing | 15:28 |
| jdub | alrighty... i'm just going to focus on hardy for now; will figure this out later :-) | 15:41 |
| jdub | thanks | 15:41 |
| hyperair | hmm one team/person can own more than one PPA now? | 15:45 |
| maxb | yes | 15:58 |
| maxb | Is there a Soyuz person around who can explain what this uploadlog means?: 2009-01-10 04:10:23 WARNING Unable to grok section 'dev', overriding it with misc | 15:58 |
| CarlFK | maxb: no clue what soyuz is, but maybe in control, Section: devel | 16:00 |
| CarlFK | I want to package https://sourceforge.net/projects/pdf417encode/ - it needs to be cleaned up, like not including binaries in the source .tar and Makefile needs an install: | 16:13 |
| CarlFK | none of the authors have posted anything sense Sep 2006 | 16:14 |
| CarlFK | should I make a bunch of patches, or hijack the project? | 16:17 |
| === hyperair is now known as hyper | ||
| === hyper is now known as hyper__ | ||
| maxb | CarlFK: You want to be on #ubuntu-motu for that sort of thing | 16:29 |
| CarlFK | maxb: oh yeah... and ask there.. :) | 16:44 |
| === abentley1 is now known as abentley | ||
| === abentley1 is now known as abentley | ||
| savvas | is it possible to upload a karmic debian source now? or when will it be, when it is announced to be openfor development? | 18:01 |
| Milosz | can I see download statistics for my PPA? | 18:04 |
| hyperair | savvas: in #ubuntu-motu, not here, and it'll only open after jaunty's release | 18:04 |
| savvas | hyperair: I meant for a PPA - but ok, thanks :) | 18:05 |
| hyperair | oh that | 18:07 |
| hyperair | hahah whoops | 18:07 |
| jpds | savvas: Probably after releases and new toolchain uploaded. | 18:16 |
| savvas | alrighty :) | 18:17 |
| hyperair | what's in a toolchain anyway? | 18:48 |
| LarstiQ | hyperair: compiler/linker/libc/etc | 18:50 |
| hyperair | LarstiQ: basically a new set of build-essentials and devscripts? | 18:50 |
| LarstiQ | hyperair: something like that | 18:51 |
| * LarstiQ doesn't know the specifics for Ubuntu | 18:51 | |
| hyperair | hmm | 18:51 |
| === bureflux is now known as afflux | ||
| natureshadow | hi! | 20:33 |
| natureshadow | A few hours ago, I successfully updated and committed a bzr branch in launchpad | 20:33 |
| natureshadow | Now it refuses my public key | 20:33 |
| natureshadow | Why's that? | 20:33 |
| === hubuntu is now known as huayra | ||
| natureshadow | Any idea concerning my ssh problem? | 21:07 |
| SamB | natureshadow: did you accidentally change your key? | 21:10 |
| natureshadow | SamB: Nope .... the data in Launchpad and my local system are identical | 21:11 |
| natureshadow | Perhaps I should just create a new one and try again? | 21:11 |
| natureshadow | I just regenerated my key, uplaoded it, and it still doesn't let me in | 21:19 |
| natureshadow | I'm not very suse whether bzr uses my key | 21:19 |
| natureshadow | It doesn't sue the standard name so I configured it in ~/.ssh/config | 21:20 |
| natureshadow | This worked until 4 hours ago though ^^ | 21:20 |
| natureshadow | Running ssh on bazaar.launchpad.net lets me in, but (of course) complains about missing shells on the server | 21:21 |
| natureshadow | So the problem must be with the ssh configuration | 21:21 |
| === james_w` is now known as james_w | ||
| natureshadow | Works again .... obviously ssh wasn't happy with the config anymore :/ | 21:29 |
| neal_s_ | Should I bother getting undeserved Karma removed? I've been mucking around with bzr as a newb, and I've been deleting and creating branches willy nilly. | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!