[01:15] <cowbellemoo> How can I confirm that bug 359672 isn't because of a change ubuntu made (and therefore be set to forward the bug upstream)?
[01:17] <mehall> right, tried debugging ACPI. I'll write it all in a pastebin to avoid spamming the channel
[01:23] <Ampelbein> cowbellemoo: you could check the patches in the ubuntu-package to see if we change anything to the specific code.
[01:24] <mehall> http://pastebin.com/f293e9958
[01:24] <mehall> there it is ^
[01:24] <mehall> (that wasn;t @ you, cowbellemoo, sorry)
[01:25] <cowbellemoo> Apelbein:  I'll do that!
[01:25] <cowbellemoo> mehall: No problem, I'm good.
[01:26] <Ampelbein> cowbellemoo: check on http://patches.ubuntu.com/r/rhythmbox to see what patches we include
[01:26] <Ampelbein> (and judging from that, there is no change to that code)
[01:26] <cowbellemoo> Ampelbein, how could you tell so quickly?
[01:26] <mehall> just incase people have forgotten, my bug was #292155
[01:27] <mehall> (keeping it fresh since I have more details)
[01:28] <Ampelbein> cowbellemoo: by looking at the patch-names. all those _svn_-named patches are backported from upstream. lpi means launchpad-integration (the help-> report a problem thingie)
[01:31] <cowbellemoo> Ampelbein, I see.  Just out of curiosity, what does the "extracted" folder contain.  Past patches?
[01:32] <Ampelbein> cowbellemoo: no, it's just the whole patch-file extracted.
[01:34] <cowbellemoo> Ampelbein, Got it.  I'm new to packaging and working with source, so thanks for the help.  :D
[01:34] <Ampelbein> cowbellemoo: np, thanks for helping out.
[01:40] <mehall> Okay, I appear to have found a dupe bug, back in the Intrepid RC
[01:42] <mehall> never done this before....
[01:42] <mehall> same bug, but on final rather than RC, and the one about RC is about Live CD boots
[01:42] <mehall> whereas this happens on all boots,.... do i mark dupe?
[01:43] <bcurtiswx> mehall: will you provide links to the two bugs please
[01:43] <mehall> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/292155
[01:43] <mehall> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/290129
[01:43] <mehall> Just found reason to believe that it may be upstream
[01:44] <mehall> similar problems in Arch, SUSE
[01:48] <mehall> yeah, it's upstream. Can;t find a report thoguh, I'll report it to bugzilla.kernel.org just now
[01:51] <bcurtiswx> mehall: with dupes (if you feel they are) you want to look to see which provides the better information (size isn't necessarily better).  Then mark the not so good one as a dupe of the better one.
[01:52] <mehall> kool, will do
[01:54] <bcurtiswx> mehall: i would say those are dupes though, good catch
[01:55] <mehall> as I said, i;m taking it upstream just now, so I'll mark them in a mo. It's probably fixed in Jaunty anyway, but it's annoying, lol
[01:56] <bcurtiswx> lol
[02:50] <andresmujica> is there something like a vault for previous versions of a package? i mean besides /var/cache/apt/archives where else do i find them?
[02:52] <dtchen> launchpadlibrarian
[02:52] <dtchen> e.g., https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux
[02:52] <dtchen> choose the version, then choose the arch and the binaries
[02:53] <andresmujica> thks dtchen !
[02:53] <dtchen> np
[03:00] <andresmujica> hmm
[03:00] <andresmujica> nope..
[03:01] <dtchen> andresmujica: what specifically are you looking for?
[03:08] <andresmujica> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/359392/comments/10
[03:08] <andresmujica> those packages
[03:08] <dtchen> sec
[03:09] <andresmujica> i thought that they could be found at packages.ubuntu.com ...
[03:10] <dtchen> i see them
[03:10] <dtchen> e.g., http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24412448/mesa-utils_7.3-1ubuntu4_amd64.deb, which is linked from https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/amd64/mesa-utils/7.3-1ubuntu4
[03:11] <dtchen> roughly, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/$ubuntu_release/$arch/$binary_package_name/$binary_package_version