[03:06]  * SamB wonders if it's worth trying to ask for a DJGPP meta-project to be created ...
[03:12] <jamesh> SamB: If you've got multiple projects you want to group together, then go for it.
[03:23] <SamB> I guess not here
[03:23] <SamB> I don't know that I want to import more than a single djgpp component ;-)
[04:32] <jamesh> SamB: probably asking for the project group to be created at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad would be the quickest.
[06:41] <MTecknology> kiko: ping
[06:45] <MTecknology> kiko: I was wondering if you ever did the membership interview
[07:47] <wgrant> Should the merge proposal +index still be showing me the status of a bug<->branch link?
[07:48] <wgrant> None of the other views have shown me that for ages.
[08:45] <speakman> Hi! Could anyone point me to any documentation how to setup and use PQM with Launchpad?
[08:46] <wgrant> speakman: I don't know about PQM, but there is the Tarmac project which integrates with Launchpad's merge proposals to do something not unlike PQM.
[08:56] <wgrant> cprov: Can I get the files for the SPR from an SPPH through the API? Or the changes file? Even the Librarian IDs would be fine.
[08:57] <speakman> wgrant: very interesting! I'll take a look right way.
[08:57] <cprov> wgrant: probably not yet, let me check the API
[08:58] <cprov> wgrant: I've reverted the API for source_publishing.changes_file_text last cycle.
[08:58] <wgrant> cprov: So I saw.
[08:59] <cprov> wgrant: yes, not possible atm.
[08:59] <wgrant> Aren't there already librarian files exported?
[08:59] <wgrant> For productreleases and the like?
[08:59] <cprov> wgrant: the fix I've implemented for the build-files (build_log, upload_log) will solve the problem in spph
[09:00] <wgrant> cprov: That it will.
[09:00] <cprov> wgrant: it's not exactly the same, sourcefiles can be 'private'
[09:00] <wgrant> Right.
[09:01] <wgrant> So it links to a view in the webapp that steals it from the (restricted) librarian.
[09:01] <cprov> wgrant: hit LP with $ppa_url/+files/<filename>
[09:01] <cprov> wgrant: you can build the filename by the source name & version
[09:01] <wgrant> cprov: Right.
[09:01] <wgrant> cprov:
[09:01] <wgrant> gah.
[09:02] <cprov> wgrant: as a immediate hack ;)
[09:02] <wgrant> cprov: Thanks.
[09:02] <wgrant> Forgot about that.
[09:19] <speakman> wgrant: Is it possible to trigger Tarmac automatically when a branch has been approved for merge?
[09:20] <wgrant> speakman: You would get cron to run it regularly, I expect.
[09:20] <wgrant> You could get it to watch the emails that Launchpad generates, but I'd call that overcomplicated.
[09:30] <primes2h> bdmurray: Hello, I have a problem with desktop-bugs renew.
[09:32] <primes2h> launchpad tells me it's about to expire and I have to contact you to prevent it from expiring, but the access is open so It shouldn't need your intervention.
[09:33] <primes2h> so I can't renew it by myself :-(
[09:36] <mrevell> primes2h: Bug expiry is disabled at the moment, so you probably don't have to do anything. gmb could you confirm?
[09:37] <primes2h> mrevell: I meant desktop-bugs team, not a bug itself.
[09:37] <wgrant> mrevell: I think primes2h is talking about his membership is ~desktop-bugs expiring.
[09:37] <primes2h> wgrant: yes
[09:37] <mrevell> wgrant: Ach, I see. Sorry primes2h...
[09:37] <primes2h> wgrant: mrevell: it seems a bug in Launchpad itself...
[09:38] <wgrant> Sort of. It doesn't make complete sense to have a restrictive renewal policy on an open team.
[09:38] <wgrant> At first glance it doesn't even make sense to have an expiry date on an open team, but it is useful. So it's probably more a bug in how the team is configured.
[09:39] <primes2h> wgrant: BTW, could you renew it?
[09:40] <primes2h> seb128 is busy now to do it...
[09:40] <primes2h> There are 24 hours left...
[09:41] <wgrant> primes2h: I have no such privilege.
[10:19] <RachedTN> hello, could any one help me with this : https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/67337  , please ?
[10:20] <speakman> wgrant: I'm thinking it might subscribe the branch's mailinglist and then get triggered by a local /etc/aliases script.
[10:22] <wgrant> speakman: You could do that, or you could just run it every so often with cron.
[10:24] <wgrant> RachedTN: That question was in the wrong place (on Ubuntu, rather than Launchpad) - I just corrected that.
[10:24] <RachedTN> wgrant: thanks a lot :)
[10:35] <mpt> barry, who designed Mailman's admin interface?
[11:14] <geser> while looking at my old open bugs I wonder why bug 147857 is still in "New" without a comment (I hope it just got overlooked and not that's that hard to add some links)
[11:29] <bigjools> geser: yes, overlooked, sorry.  I will triage it now.
[12:54] <barry> mpt: what, in launchpad or vanilla mailman?
[12:54] <mpt> barry, vanilla
[12:55] <barry> mpt: probably mostly john viega, with touches from ken manhiemer and other devs from the late '90's
[13:31] <lizardo> hi all, does anyone know who should I contact to reclaim a launchpad account name? The account in question seems to have never been used (and maybe generated automatically?)
[13:38]  * apw is noting huge delays on the beta launchpad system, is it just me or a general issue
[13:43] <wgrant> It's being fairly quick for me.
[13:46] <salgado> lizardo, have you tried contacting the user?  usually, that's enough
[13:46] <apw> wgrant, bah ... thanks for checking
[13:47] <salgado> lizardo, if you don't get a response from the user you can add a question at https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion and we'll take care of it
[13:49] <lizardo> salgado: I was just doing that (forgot to make the obvious and read the FAQ) :) thanks anyway
[13:50] <lizardo> salgado: I mean, I tried contacting the user , but no answer (account looks really inactive); now I created a ticket on the answer system
[15:12] <popey> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libv4l/+bug/260918 (Error ID: OOPS-1200EB145)
[15:47] <mrevell> popey: you go the oops while viewing that bug page?
[15:47] <mrevell> s/go/got
[15:48] <popey> yes
[15:49] <mrevell> popey: Thanks. Ursinha will almost certainly take a look at that later today
[15:50] <popey> ta
[15:52] <Ursinha> I will
[15:52] <Ursinha> hmm
[15:53] <Ursinha> that oops is an amsn one?
[15:53] <Ursinha> libv4l package in ubuntu
[15:54] <Ursinha> mrevell, that's not a launchpad bug :)
[15:54] <Ursinha> but an ubuntu's
[15:55] <mrevell> Ursinha: But if the page is oopsing when viewing that bug then it's a Launchpad problem, no?
[15:56] <Ursinha> mrevell, hmm, I see the problem
[15:56]  * Ursinha realizes she's unable of doing more than one thing at once
[15:57] <mrevell> heh, it's early for you :)
[15:59] <Ursinha> mrevell, :) I'll take a look yes
[15:59] <mrevell> thanks Ursinha
[16:00] <Ursinha> mrevell, np :)
[16:18] <aWak3N> hello, i get this error using dput: "No signature on /home/..../...source.changes". How can I fix this?
[16:48] <geser> cprov or bigjools: is it correct that every published binary package should have the corresponding source package also published?
[16:48] <bigjools> geser: yes
[16:49] <geser> than I've found a package where that isn't the case: plasmoid-playwolf in jaunty
[16:49] <bigjools> let me check
[16:49] <geser> plasmoid-playwolf | 0.7-0ubuntu2 | http://de.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages
[16:49] <geser> plasmoid-playwolf | 0.7-0ubuntu1 | http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Sources
[16:50] <Spads> Source: plasma-widget-playwolf
[16:50] <Spads> apt-get source plasma-widget-playwolf WFM
[16:50] <bigjools> looks like the source name changed
[16:51] <geser> yes, the source package name got changed, it produced for a transitional package in the new source package but got dropped it again
[16:52] <bigjools> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+package/plasmoid-playwolf
[16:52] <geser> we have now a binary package produced once from the new source package (but not anymore) and a older source package with the same name
[16:53] <geser> I stumbled about it because of http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23138577/upload_861473_log.txt
[16:54] <geser> bigjools: if you follow that to https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/plasma-widget-playwolf you will see that plasmoid-playwolf isn't listed below the binary packages
[16:55] <geser> I guess the transitional package build from plasma-wigdet-playwolf in the past got assigned back to "plasmoid-playwolf" source package
[16:56] <geser> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/plasmoid-playwolf lists it at binary packages but that's not true
[16:59] <RachedTN> hello, could anyone help me with this : https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/67337
[17:01] <bigjools> geser, I think this is a packaging issue, right?
[17:01] <mrevell> RachedTN: It's assigned to our sysadmins, so they'll get to it soon.
[17:04] <RachedTN> mrevell: I have simplified the issue, and now I am asking just to delete : https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tn-drafting   :)
[17:04] <geser> bigjools: I don't think so: should plasmoid-playwolf 0.7-0ubuntu2 (a transitional package build in the past from plasma-widget-playwolf but dropped again) be published as it isn't build anymore from that source package and the old source package (plasmoid-playwolf) is older (0.7-0ubuntu1)?
[17:05] <mrevell> RachedTN: Okay, great, the sysadmins will see that note. Thanks for the update :)
[17:05] <geser> bigjools: I'm planning to get the old source (plasmoid-playwolf) removed so it will get fixed, but wondered if soyuz did here the right thing
[17:06] <bigjools> geser: I see
[17:31] <sproaty> How can I stop launchpad emailing me about all bugs in my project when I report them? If I make any priority/status changes, I'm emailed about them, which is quite silly I think
[17:32] <intellectronica> sproaty: you can't, but you can filter those emails using your mail client
[17:32] <sproaty> I've set thunderbird to mark them as read; still annoying though especially the priority updates I make myself
[17:43] <Pollywog> I have a launchpad account and I want to report a but in kmail but I have some things in my dbg output that I do not want posted in a public area.  Is my dgb output posted where it can be seen by anyone?
[17:43] <Pollywog> dbg*
[17:44] <Pollywog> I suppose I can hunt down all the stuff I do not want there and remove it, replace it with "REMOVED"
[18:20] <natureshadow> hi!
[18:20] <natureshadow> I registered a bzr branch several hours ago: https://code.launchpad.net/~jaction-devs/jaction/maindev
[18:20] <natureshadow> But bzr complains: bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jaction-devs/jaction/maindev/".
[18:20] <natureshadow> Why's that?
[18:21] <natureshadow> (Apparently, the directory exists on the server, but does not have a .bzr subdirectory ...)
[18:32] <mthaddon> natureshadow: all looks okay from here - you've figured it out?
[18:33] <natureshadow> mthaddon: Yes, somehow .... but I think something wasn't right anyway
[18:33] <natureshadow> I had to push a locally created branch, overriding a bzr warning
[18:33] <mthaddon> natureshadow: that's fine - assuming you did want what you had locally to be the same as on LP
[18:34] <natureshadow> mthaddon: There wasn't a .bzr dir in the branch dir on lp, so I had to do bzr push --use-existing-dir
[18:35] <natureshadow> That's not what a freidn of mine had to do when he registered his branch
[18:35] <mthaddon> natureshadow: how did you create the branch on LP?
[18:36] <natureshadow> mthaddon: Using the web interface
[18:37] <rockstar> natureshadow, the registration of a hosted branch is unnecessary.  You can just push without registering first.
[18:37] <rockstar> natureshadow, I'm assuming you had to `bzr push --overwrite`
[18:38] <mthaddon> rockstar: should that be more obvious in the UI?
[18:39] <mthaddon> rockstar: I'm trying to think of any case when you'd want to register a hosted branch that hadn't yet been created...
[18:39] <rockstar> mthaddon, yes, beuno and I discussed it yesterday again.  There's an open bug about it.
[18:39] <mthaddon> rockstar: could you point us to it so natureshadow can subscribe if he's interested?
[18:39] <mthaddon> er, he/she
[18:40] <natureshadow> he :)
[18:40] <rockstar> mthaddon, natureshadow, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/288645
[18:40] <mthaddon> thx
[18:40] <natureshadow> Well, I didn't find it to obvious
[18:40] <natureshadow> I thought the directory for the branch is created when I register it
[18:40] <natureshadow> And then I can push it there
[18:40] <rockstar> natureshadow, yeah, that's the issue.  It's not obvious.
[18:40]  * natureshadow is coming from SVN so isn't that used to bzr ;)
[18:43] <natureshadow> OK
[18:43] <natureshadow> SO, if I want a branch in project foo named bar owned by foobar
[18:43] <natureshadow> I simply push to lp:~foobar/foo/bar ?
[18:43] <natureshadow> And then it's there?
[18:44] <natureshadow> Nothing to do in the web interface?
[18:44] <rockstar> natureshadow, exactly.
[18:44] <rockstar> natureshadow, see also: http://theironlion.net/blog/2009/01/13/using-bazaar-launchpad-making-pushing-easy/
[18:44] <natureshadow> Then, what is the "register a hosted branch" function actually for?
[18:45] <rockstar> natureshadow, I'm on a quest to remove it.  :)
[18:46] <natureshadow> ok :D
[18:46] <natureshadow> rockstar: The blog link you posted proposes a great idea
[18:46] <natureshadow> thx :)
[18:47] <rockstar> natureshadow, thanks.  I wrote it.  :)
[18:47] <natureshadow> ok :)
[18:47] <natureshadow> Do you have any proposal how to use that when I have those branches owned by different teams?
[19:01] <BUGabundo1> hey everyone
[19:02] <BUGabundo1> how is the contact?
[19:02] <BUGabundo1> mrevell doesn't seem to be here
[19:02] <BUGabundo1> user https://bugs.launchpad.net/~raul-pereira
[19:02] <BUGabundo1> changed his username somehow, and lost all his data from LP
[19:08] <rockstar> BUGabundo1, I think the "how" of how he changed his user name is probably important.
[19:09] <BUGabundo1> rockstar: ask eu_
[19:09] <eu_> :)
[19:09] <BUGabundo1> eu_ was the user who changed it !
[19:09] <eu_> hi!
[19:10] <BUGabundo1> so eu_ "how" did you change your username?
[19:10] <eu_> I changed my name (not my Display Name) and lost track of all my bugs
[19:10] <eu_> I'm a new user, and I've reported two bugs, I think...
[19:11] <natureshadow> Sounds like it can happen, but shouldn't happen ;)
[19:12] <eu_> :D
[19:15] <BUGabundo1> he seems to be a even bug finder then me!
[19:16] <natureshadow> There must be something you Launchpad guys did really right .... you got me to turn away from SF.net towards LP within only 2 days ;)
[19:16] <cody-somerville> :D
[19:17] <natureshadow> What I'm *really* missing is the integrated Wiki
[19:17] <BUGabundo1> natureshadow: its coming
[19:17] <natureshadow> But that's only a little price for getting the blueprints stuff and that :)
[19:17] <natureshadow> BUGabundo1: Uh, great! Any idea when we can expect it ;) ?
[19:17] <BUGabundo1> read the road map
[19:17] <BUGabundo1> there's a bug for that
[19:18] <natureshadow> BUGabundo1: Gah, I knew I'd missed something :D
[19:18] <BUGabundo1> so noone can help eu_ debug it?
[19:18] <BUGabundo1> kiko: ping
[19:19] <eu_> Well, filling a bug of Launchpad in Launchpad! :D
[19:19] <BUGabundo1> humm sure
[19:19] <rockstar> eu_, how did you change your username?
[19:19] <BUGabundo1> just not sure launchpad or malone
[19:19] <matsubara> BUGabundo1: eu_: bug 361143 and bug 357750 are the reported bugs by raul pereira. name changing won't delete anything under that person. raul pereira was affected by bug 5977
[19:19] <BUGabundo1> eu_: where did you go to make the change?
[19:19] <BUGabundo1> matsubara: thanks
[19:20] <eu_> :D
[19:20] <kiko> BUGabundo1, mm?
[19:20] <eu_> way to go!
[19:20] <BUGabundo1> kiko: sorry for the noise... matsubara already replied
[19:20] <natureshadow> BUGabundo1: This: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/306378 ?
[19:21] <BUGabundo1> natureshadow: I guess
[19:21] <natureshadow> BUGabundo1: Would this also be a place to collaborate on blueprints?
[19:22] <BUGabundo1> natureshadow: don't ask me! im just a LP user
[19:22] <natureshadow> oh ok :)
[19:22] <natureshadow> Anyway, this knowledge bays seems to be a moderated place for docs
[19:22] <natureshadow> Not necessarily like a WIki
[19:24] <eu_> ubottu: so, how can I access that info, in advanced search?
[19:24] <eu_> oh
[19:24] <eu_> :D
[19:24] <natureshadow> eu_: :)
[19:24] <eu_> :)
[19:25] <natureshadow> ubottu: You could just be a bit more helpful *shame on you* :D
[19:27] <eu_> lol
[19:27] <BUGabundo1> eu_: you want matsubara or rockstar
[19:28] <eu_> oh, that's ok, I found the LP bug
[19:28] <eu_> thanks
[21:10] <Joeb454> Ok, where would be an appropriate place to report inappropriate content, here, the mailing list, or the feedback email address?
[21:10] <tsimpson> inappropriate content?
[21:11] <beuno> Joeb454, point me at it
[21:11] <Joeb454> beuno: https://edge.launchpad.net/~abhinaba-moulik
[21:12] <beuno> Joeb454, thanks for letting us know, I'll ask a sysadmin to remove it
[21:12] <Joeb454> beuno: no worries :) and thanks
[22:51] <HammerHead66> I'm having a problem with viewing bugs and I am logged in can someone help?
[22:55] <HammerHead66> anyone?
[22:55] <beuno> HammerHead66, sure, what's the problem?
[22:56] <HammerHead66> I can't view bugs for some reason
[22:57] <HammerHead66> ﻿beuno: I'm at this site https://launchpad.net/ I click on the bugs tab and the page just keeps loading
[22:57] <Ursinha> HammerHead66, are you using opera?
[22:58] <HammerHead66> what is that?
[22:58] <Ursinha> HammerHead66, a browser :) so you're not
[22:58] <HammerHead66> fire fox is my browser
[22:58] <beuno> HammerHead66, do you have another browser handy to test?
[22:59] <HammerHead66> no
[23:02] <HammerHead66> I'll try to restart my pc
[23:02] <HammerHead66> bb
[23:14] <hggdh> hi folks. It seems http://feeds.launchpad.net/ubuntu/latest-bugs.atom is again stopped/unresponsive/extremely delayed
[23:17] <hggdh> which also causes #ubuntu-bugs-announce to stall
[23:20] <hggdh> charlie-tca, looking again at the xchat BT I had, it might have been a pulseaudio update that solved it
[23:20] <charlie-tca> That would be strange... I don't use pulseaudio myself
[23:21] <dtchen> hggdh: where's the BT?
[23:22] <hggdh> dtchen, let's go back to #ubuntu-bugs -- I raised it on the wrong channel
[23:24] <kiko> hggdh, the issue is with the replication, which again is lagging
[23:27] <hggdh> kiko, I guessed so, but someone said that it would automagically flip to another server on bad lagging
[23:30] <kiko> mmmm
[23:38] <hggdh> kiko, I do not know if you did anything at all, but it seems we are back in business, so... thank you, just in case ;-)
[23:39] <kiko> mthaddon, just told me. we were freaked out about it, am now figuring out what happened