[02:14] <jcastro> bdmurray: did http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/reports/database/unlinked-bugwatch.html break?
[03:58] <bdmurray> jcastro: 2009:04:12 02:11 Full update with DB reimport: bzr revno 7962
[03:58] <bdmurray> jcastro: so the database is not up to date
[03:58] <bdmurray> or maybe it did break
[04:00] <bdmurray> jcastro: No, it moved you silly goose!
[04:00] <bdmurray> jcastro: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/launchpad-database/unlinked-bugwatch.html
[06:00] <dholbach> good morning
[06:45] <Flannel> bdmurray: Would you happen to have the bugsquad icon source?  (svg is obviously preferred, but anything larger than the icon)
[07:27] <YoBoY> good morning
[07:50] <maxb> window level all
[14:21] <ccm> hey
[14:21] <ccm> i have a question towards 334657
[14:21] <ccm> erm #334657
[14:21] <dholbach> bug 334657
[14:22] <dholbach> hi ccm :)
[14:22] <ccm> i dont know how to get more attention towards it
[14:22] <james_w> hey ccm
[14:22] <ccm> i think this one is really grave
[14:22] <ccm> as it makes ubuntu for some users close to unusable
[14:22] <ccm> i already tried to assign it to the most fitting person after it hang around for a couple of time
[14:23] <ccm> but actually there doesn't seem to be any action
[14:23] <ccm> hi dholbach :)
[14:23] <ccm> hi james_w :)
[14:23] <ccm> as you see it also has a growing number of duplicates
[14:24] <dholbach> bdmurray, pedro_: was bug 334657 brought up with the release team somehow?
[14:28] <ccm> dholbach: hope it wasnt a mistake assigning it to jriddel a couple of days ago
[14:29] <dholbach> ccm: I'll ask slangasek on #ubuntu-devel
[14:33] <dholbach> ccm: might make sense if you join there
[15:44] <bddebian> Boo
[15:46] <trichobezoar> What do I need to do to get the fix for NC10 mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/275120/comments/5 part of the kernel?  I upgraded to the beta but the kill/led are not working as specified
[15:53] <jpds> trichobezoar: -> #ubuntu-kernel.
[15:55] <bdmurray> dholbach: Did you get an answer?
[15:55] <dholbach> bdmurray: slangasek and ccm talked about it
[15:55] <dholbach> thanks bdmurray
[15:59] <trichobezoar> thanks jpds
[16:21] <BUGabundo> bddebian: foo
[16:28] <bddebian> BUGabundo: :)
[16:36]  * jtholmes is away: for about 3 hours
[20:48] <probs> hi
[20:48] <probs> will someone set priority for that?   It seems Critical or High -  it makes  KDE fail after 2-3 days of use (mem leak) unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase/+bug/343944
[21:06] <hggdh> ah well. another shoot & flee
[21:09] <bdmurray> hggdh: but its epic!
[21:09] <hggdh> heh... I was thinking about the same
[21:10] <hggdh> bdmurray, anyways, it this can be shown to be indeed a leak, this may have a nice impact
[21:11] <hggdh> (and, since I do not run KDE, I am not sure what we could use to gather more data... valgrind is probably really not a good option for plasma)
[21:11] <bdmurray> the confirmer seems to be running a different release
[21:12] <hggdh> yes. 8.10 against 9.04.
[21:15] <hggdh> and the packages are wrong. /usr/bin/plasma is in kdebase-workspace-bin
[22:18] <seb128> BUGabundo: hi, do you still get bug #352681?
[22:18] <jcastro> ogasawara: btw I can't reproduce bug 342172, I ran it through the gauntlet
[22:18] <BUGabundo> seb128: not sure
[22:18] <seb128> could you try?
[22:18] <BUGabundo> haven't tested in a while
[22:19] <BUGabundo> humm that would mean either emptying my trash or start a new VM
[22:19] <bdmurray> jcastro: hi!
[22:19] <BUGabundo> neither a good option now
[22:19] <BUGabundo> seb128: nobody else is complaining for now
[22:19] <BUGabundo> guess we can mark as unreproduceble, right?
[22:19] <seb128> BUGabundo: move your trash somewhere else or rename the directory and try? ;-)
[22:19] <jcastro> hi bdmurray!
[22:20] <seb128> BUGabundo: then move it back
[22:20] <ogasawara> jcastro: thanks for testing.  based on your feedback I may just close it and have him reopen if it's still an issue.
[22:20] <BUGabundo> seb128: 100GiBs of it?
[22:20] <jcastro> jcastro: okey dokey, I'll update the wiki
[22:20] <BUGabundo> not that much free disk
[22:20] <seb128> BUGabundo: renaming a directory doesn't involve copying any data
[22:21] <BUGabundo> seb128: I'll try with a new VM tomorrow morning, if nothing urgent comes up on the office
[22:21] <BUGabundo> thanks for helping
[22:22] <seb128> BUGabundo: you're welcome, should we close the bug for now since nobody else get it and you can reopen if you still get it when you try?
[22:22] <BUGabundo> yes, seems sensible to me
[22:23] <seb128> ok, doing that
[22:23] <drguildo> can somebody clear something up for me regarding the jaunty release candidate installer?
[22:23] <drguildo> i'm actually not sure if it's a bug or just really bad design
[22:23] <drguildo> which i guess is a bug
[22:24] <BUGabundo> drguildo: what is it?
[22:24] <drguildo> BUGabundo: do each of these coloured segments represent partitions on the hard drive?
[22:25] <drguildo> because with the default option of "install them side by side", the graphic it generates seem to indicate a partition layout which defies the laws of physics
[22:25] <BUGabundo> ehhe
[22:25] <drguildo> because there's a slider that represents my existing windows partition
[22:25] <BUGabundo> how come?
[22:25] <drguildo> and when i slide it to the left, the ubuntu partition is behind it
[22:25] <jcastro> hey bdmurray, is it possible to determine what percentage of incoming bugs are using ubuntu-bug vs. the web ui?
[22:26] <bdmurray> yes
[22:26] <jcastro> any chance we're doing that already?
[22:26] <bdmurray> why yes
[22:26] <bdmurray> jcastro: don't you read my blog!
[22:26] <drguildo> so is that normal or what?
[22:26] <bdmurray> http://www.murraytwins.com/blog/?p=38
[22:27] <drguildo> also when i select "use the largest continuous free space", the entire drive turns brown
[22:27] <drguildo> which says to me that it will use the whole drive
[22:27] <drguildo> i guess the good thing is that normal users will be no more confused than i am
[22:28] <drguildo> seeing as this makes absolutely no sense
[22:28] <BUGabundo> could be a bug in artwork drguildo
[22:28] <jcastro> bdmurray: man dude, wild, I remember reading this too...
[22:28] <bdmurray> jcastro: I'm running current numbers now
[22:28] <drguildo> shall i file a bug in the installer?
[22:29] <BUGabundo> drguildo: had a couple of screenshots too
[22:29] <BUGabundo> you know the drill
[22:29] <jcastro> bdmurray: would it be possible to put this up in a slick graph someplace?
[22:29] <BUGabundo> $ubuntu-bug PACKAGE
[22:29] <jcastro> bdmurray: I would like to keep track so we can measure how well our community "please us ubuntu-bug" things are working out
[22:29] <BUGabundo> bdmurray: 10-15% ? that's all?
[22:30] <drguildo> and what should be the value of PACKAGE?
[22:30]  * BUGabundo must put ubuntu-bugs info on steroids
[22:30] <bdmurray> BUGabundo: yes but that doesn't include apport-crash bug reports
[22:30] <bdmurray> just bugs tagged apport-bug
[22:30] <BUGabundo> drguildo: ubiquity or something
[22:30] <BUGabundo> my bad memory doesn't help
[22:30] <bdmurray> jcastro: For the mbox: ubuntu-bugs/2009-04
[22:30] <bdmurray> NEW bug reports: 4629 (100.00%)
[22:30] <bdmurray> apport bug reports: 933 (20.16%)
[22:31] <BUGabundo> bdmurray: 20% of those are mine! LOL
[22:31] <bdmurray> drguildo: ubiquity
[22:31] <drguildo> ok
[22:31] <drguildo> thanks for your help
[22:31] <bdmurray> and package install failure: 325 (7.02%)
[22:31] <bdmurray> so that's about 27% this month
[23:05] <askand> How do I add "pidgin (Ubuntu)" to bug  338695?
[23:06] <bdmurray> also affects distribution
[23:06] <askand> thanks
[23:08] <BUGabundo> bdmurray: does apport-collect -p PACKAGE bugid, add it to the LP as affects?
[23:08] <bdmurray> BUGabundo: nope
[23:12] <BUGabundo> just the logs... ok