=== fader__ is now known as fader_ === widox_ is now known as widox [02:14] bdmurray: did http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/reports/database/unlinked-bugwatch.html break? [03:58] jcastro: 2009:04:12 02:11 Full update with DB reimport: bzr revno 7962 [03:58] jcastro: so the database is not up to date [03:58] or maybe it did break [04:00] jcastro: No, it moved you silly goose! [04:00] jcastro: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/launchpad-database/unlinked-bugwatch.html [06:00] good morning === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [06:45] bdmurray: Would you happen to have the bugsquad icon source? (svg is obviously preferred, but anything larger than the icon) [07:27] good morning [07:50] window level all === android is now known as jussi01 === pedro__ is now known as pedro_ [14:21] hey [14:21] i have a question towards 334657 [14:21] erm #334657 [14:21] bug 334657 [14:21] Launchpad bug 334657 in qt4-x11 "Subpixel/Lcd mode with VRGB/VBGR makes qt4 applications on Jaunty unreadable" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/334657 [14:22] hi ccm :) [14:22] i dont know how to get more attention towards it [14:22] hey ccm [14:22] i think this one is really grave [14:22] as it makes ubuntu for some users close to unusable [14:22] i already tried to assign it to the most fitting person after it hang around for a couple of time [14:23] but actually there doesn't seem to be any action [14:23] hi dholbach :) [14:23] hi james_w :) [14:23] as you see it also has a growing number of duplicates [14:24] bdmurray, pedro_: was bug 334657 brought up with the release team somehow? [14:24] Launchpad bug 334657 in qt4-x11 "Subpixel/Lcd mode with VRGB/VBGR makes qt4 applications on Jaunty unreadable" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/334657 [14:28] dholbach: hope it wasnt a mistake assigning it to jriddel a couple of days ago [14:29] ccm: I'll ask slangasek on #ubuntu-devel [14:33] ccm: might make sense if you join there [15:44] Boo [15:46] What do I need to do to get the fix for NC10 mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/275120/comments/5 part of the kernel? I upgraded to the beta but the kill/led are not working as specified [15:53] trichobezoar: -> #ubuntu-kernel. [15:55] dholbach: Did you get an answer? [15:55] bdmurray: slangasek and ccm talked about it [15:55] thanks bdmurray [15:59] thanks jpds [16:21] bddebian: foo [16:28] BUGabundo: :) [16:36] * jtholmes is away: for about 3 hours === fader_ is now known as fader|lunch === fader|lunch is now known as fader_ [20:48] hi [20:48] will someone set priority for that? It seems Critical or High - it makes KDE fail after 2-3 days of use (mem leak) unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase/+bug/343944 [20:48] Ubuntu bug 343944 in kdebase "Epic plasma memory leak (0.1 mb / sec)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [21:06] ah well. another shoot & flee [21:09] hggdh: but its epic! [21:09] heh... I was thinking about the same [21:10] bdmurray, anyways, it this can be shown to be indeed a leak, this may have a nice impact [21:11] (and, since I do not run KDE, I am not sure what we could use to gather more data... valgrind is probably really not a good option for plasma) [21:11] the confirmer seems to be running a different release [21:12] yes. 8.10 against 9.04. [21:15] and the packages are wrong. /usr/bin/plasma is in kdebase-workspace-bin [22:18] BUGabundo: hi, do you still get bug #352681? [22:18] Launchpad bug 352681 in nautilus "deleted files are not shown on Trash applet" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/352681 [22:18] ogasawara: btw I can't reproduce bug 342172, I ran it through the gauntlet [22:18] Launchpad bug 342172 in linux "[Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq 6820s] suspend/resume failure" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/342172 [22:18] seb128: not sure [22:18] could you try? [22:18] haven't tested in a while [22:19] humm that would mean either emptying my trash or start a new VM [22:19] jcastro: hi! [22:19] neither a good option now [22:19] seb128: nobody else is complaining for now [22:19] guess we can mark as unreproduceble, right? [22:19] BUGabundo: move your trash somewhere else or rename the directory and try? ;-) [22:19] hi bdmurray! [22:20] BUGabundo: then move it back [22:20] jcastro: thanks for testing. based on your feedback I may just close it and have him reopen if it's still an issue. [22:20] seb128: 100GiBs of it? [22:20] jcastro: okey dokey, I'll update the wiki [22:20] not that much free disk [22:20] BUGabundo: renaming a directory doesn't involve copying any data [22:21] seb128: I'll try with a new VM tomorrow morning, if nothing urgent comes up on the office [22:21] thanks for helping [22:22] BUGabundo: you're welcome, should we close the bug for now since nobody else get it and you can reopen if you still get it when you try? [22:22] yes, seems sensible to me [22:23] ok, doing that [22:23] can somebody clear something up for me regarding the jaunty release candidate installer? [22:23] i'm actually not sure if it's a bug or just really bad design [22:23] which i guess is a bug [22:24] drguildo: what is it? [22:24] BUGabundo: do each of these coloured segments represent partitions on the hard drive? [22:25] because with the default option of "install them side by side", the graphic it generates seem to indicate a partition layout which defies the laws of physics [22:25] ehhe [22:25] because there's a slider that represents my existing windows partition [22:25] how come? [22:25] and when i slide it to the left, the ubuntu partition is behind it [22:25] hey bdmurray, is it possible to determine what percentage of incoming bugs are using ubuntu-bug vs. the web ui? [22:26] yes [22:26] any chance we're doing that already? [22:26] why yes [22:26] jcastro: don't you read my blog! [22:26] so is that normal or what? [22:26] http://www.murraytwins.com/blog/?p=38 [22:27] also when i select "use the largest continuous free space", the entire drive turns brown [22:27] which says to me that it will use the whole drive [22:27] i guess the good thing is that normal users will be no more confused than i am [22:28] seeing as this makes absolutely no sense [22:28] could be a bug in artwork drguildo [22:28] bdmurray: man dude, wild, I remember reading this too... [22:28] jcastro: I'm running current numbers now [22:28] shall i file a bug in the installer? [22:29] drguildo: had a couple of screenshots too [22:29] you know the drill [22:29] bdmurray: would it be possible to put this up in a slick graph someplace? [22:29] $ubuntu-bug PACKAGE [22:29] bdmurray: I would like to keep track so we can measure how well our community "please us ubuntu-bug" things are working out [22:29] bdmurray: 10-15% ? that's all? [22:30] and what should be the value of PACKAGE? [22:30] * BUGabundo must put ubuntu-bugs info on steroids [22:30] BUGabundo: yes but that doesn't include apport-crash bug reports [22:30] just bugs tagged apport-bug [22:30] drguildo: ubiquity or something [22:30] my bad memory doesn't help [22:30] jcastro: For the mbox: ubuntu-bugs/2009-04 [22:30] NEW bug reports: 4629 (100.00%) [22:30] apport bug reports: 933 (20.16%) [22:31] bdmurray: 20% of those are mine! LOL [22:31] drguildo: ubiquity [22:31] ok [22:31] thanks for your help [22:31] and package install failure: 325 (7.02%) [22:31] so that's about 27% this month [23:05] How do I add "pidgin (Ubuntu)" to bug 338695? [23:05] Launchpad bug 338695 in banshee "low res icons for notifications" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/338695 [23:06] also affects distribution [23:06] thanks [23:08] bdmurray: does apport-collect -p PACKAGE bugid, add it to the LP as affects? [23:08] BUGabundo: nope [23:12] just the logs... ok === Daviey_ is now known as Daviey