[00:04] <tritium> Seeker`: it can't hurt.
[00:06] <Seeker`> ubottu, lightscribe is <reply> For information on how to use LightScribe on Ubuntu please see the Wiki at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LightScribe
[00:06] <Seeker`> !lightscribe
[00:06] <Seeker`> !lightscribe > noodlesgc
[03:08] <elky> tsimpson, ta muchly
[03:29] <elky_> @mark yaris1234567891 #ubuntu-offtopic for future reference of attitude
[03:36] <elky> hhrm, the chan should go before the nick i think. whups
[07:00] <bazhang> * [thief] (n=iytrf@c122-106-225-7.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au  thefeds?
[07:01] <bazhang> just nickchanged to Linux_is_illegal
[07:08] <elky_> yep
[07:09] <bazhang> only in #u, no disturbances so far
[07:10] <elky> he has 6 bans in there at least
[07:10] <bazhang> really wow
[07:11] <elky> there's rarely more than 2 other people on from that section of optusnet
[07:11] <elky> and never in #u
[07:11] <bazhang> thefeds!n=blank@c122-106-199-225.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au 
[07:12] <bazhang> seems to match almost exactly from ban list
[07:13] <elky> i'd be willing to suggest a nice blanket ban on c122-106*belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au and just exempt any individuals who ask
[07:14] <bazhang> so re-ban him for ban evasion?
[07:14] <elky> definately
[07:14] <bazhang> or a p i c i master ban
[07:14] <elky> a what?
[07:14] <bazhang> hehe
[07:15] <bazhang> p i c i did a ban on cristi that covered them all
[07:15] <elky> probably similar to what i'm suggesting
[07:16] <bazhang> I'll likely ban all of .au though
[07:16] <elky> he also has the nick ban which forwards to here, so 7 banlist slots he's wasting
[07:16] <elky> bazhang, do what i suggested
[07:17] <bazhang> elky, not sure how to with a script (chanserv.py)
[07:18] <elky> you do it without the script. you op up, and type /mode +b *!*@c122-106*belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au
[07:18] <bazhang> okay thanks
[07:19] <elky> and i'll clear out all except the nick forward
[07:20] <elky> he left, or changed nick again?
[07:20] <bazhang> missed it, let me scroll back a few
[07:21] <elky> see #f
[07:21] <bazhang> yep quit
[07:22] <elky> watch
[07:22] <bazhang> * Kukkiwon (n=kernel@c122-106-234-8.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au
[07:23] <elky> -NickServ- Registered : Apr 19 06:15:02 2009 (8 minutes, 11 seconds ago)
[07:24] <bazhang> wow. thought they needed to wait two weeks, especially when its for ban-evading
[07:24] <elky> depends if the staffer looks
[07:24] <bazhang> aha
[07:25] <badfish69> this isn't #ubuntu
[07:26] <elky_> badfish69, it means you've probably been banned from #ubuntu
[07:26] <badfish69> oh
[07:26] <badfish69> that blows
[07:26] <elky_> @bansearch badfish69
[07:27] <elky_> a few times, it seems
[07:28] <bazhang> and most likely ban evading the other day, not conclusive though (after being banned as badfish69 and running bots)
[07:45] <bazhang> oh he's logged in twice; badfish69 is in +1
[07:46] <bazhang> * [killedkillerb] (n=drinkycr@12-201-8-30.client.mchsi.com): nadie
[07:48] <elky> trolls sometimes fork processes. some are just stupid enough to use the same process name ;)
[07:48] <bazhang> I just asked you here badfish69 
[07:48] <badfish69> yeah
[07:48] <badfish69> i know
[07:48] <badfish69> that's why im here
[07:49] <bazhang> you were also logged in as badfish
[07:49] <badfish69> netbook
[07:49] <bazhang> and killedkillerb
[07:49] <badfish69> the one i'm about to put ubuntu+1 on
[07:49] <bazhang> badfish69, you are banned in #ubuntu
[07:49] <badfish69> is this going somewhere?
[07:49] <bazhang> so any other boxes you have run are banned as well
[07:49] <badfish69> you mean my campus
[07:50] <badfish69> i graduate in 2 weeks
[07:50] <bazhang> including bots of course
[07:50] <badfish69> i don't run bots
[07:50] <badfish69> i run a quote script that people who aren't humorless have fun with
[07:50] <bazhang> ban evasion is against freenode policy
[07:50] <elky_> badfish69, it appears you have a static ip.
[07:51] <badfish69> and?
[07:51] <badfish69> is this going somewhere?
[07:51] <elky_> !help
[07:51] <badfish69> Active Triggers: !quote !addquote !duke !nukem !handey !homsar
[07:51] <elky_> yes, it is.
[07:51] <badfish69> if i lose the script can i be unbanned?
[07:51] <elky_> kindly disable that while in ubuntu channels.
[07:52] <elky_> most likely
[07:52] <badfish69> unloaded
[07:52] <elky_> !help
[07:52] <elky_> next time we see it, it will not be unlifted
[07:52] <badfish69> np
[07:52] <bazhang> and the ban evasion
[07:53] <elky_> bazhang, oh? where was that?
[07:53] <bazhang> elky_, just now
[07:53] <badfish69> netbook
[07:53] <badfish69> wireless
[07:53] <bazhang> * [killedkillerb] (n=drinkycr@12-201-8-30.client.mchsi.com): nadi
[07:53] <bazhang>  badfish (n=drinkycr@12-201-8-30.client.mchsi.com)
[07:54] <bazhang> just banned from #ubuntu
[07:54] <bazhang> and killedkillerc yesterday (though not banned at the time)
[07:54] <elky_> i think we'll keep that ip out for another day.
[07:55] <badfish69> i was going back and forth between the netbook and the desktop
[07:55] <badfish69> i think you'll find the majority of the time was spent in #pxe and #networking
[07:55] <badfish69> oh
[07:55] <badfish69> and #windows
[07:55] <elky_> yet it was our channels you used it to evade the ban
[07:55] <badfish69> what can i say
[07:55] <badfish69> i'm guilty
[07:55] <elky_> and it's for evading the bans in our channels that it's locked out for another day.
[07:55] <badfish69> you got me
[07:55] <badfish69> good eye
[07:56] <bazhang> that's it? 'good eye'?
[07:57] <badfish69> what do you want?
[07:57] <badfish69> nudes?
[07:57] <elky_> bazhang, can you get the -8-6 ban lifted? my other nick is lagging
[07:57] <elky_> bazhang, he's being a good sport, dont ask for an arguement
[07:57] <bazhang> elky_, sure thing
[07:58] <badfish69> am i good in here now?
[07:59] <elky_> come back tomorrow to get your wifi unbanned
[07:59] <badfish69> like
[07:59] <badfish69> 2am monday?
[07:59] <badfish69> after 24 full hours i assume?
[08:00] <elky> at least. so the first chance you get after that point in time
[08:00] <badfish69> kk
[08:00] <badfish69> see ya then
[08:01] <elky> bazhang, seriously, dont ask for them to argue. if they're being accepting, leave it at that
[08:03] <bazhang> elky, only ban is for badfish!*@* redirected to here
[08:04] <bazhang> twas i k on ia's ban remove it?
[08:06] <elky_> badfish!* would not have sent him here... would it?
[08:07] <bazhang> it has the #ubuntu-ops appended
[08:07] <bazhang> thus the ability to switch to killedkillerb successfully
[08:08] <elky_> lift it then i guess. we have the netbook out with the 8-30 ban
[08:09] <elky_> also, i just found another thefeds ban. the one on unaffiliated/windowsxppro
[08:14] <elky_> oh lookie what bt picked up for us before gsuter!n=gsuter@c122-106-247-152.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au probably not thefeds
[08:14] <bazhang> and one badfish69 redirect to here set by p i c i
[08:14] <bazhang> cant see the windowsxp_pro one though
[08:15] <bazhang> oh wait I see it
[08:15] <elky_> sort by mask and look in the unaffiliated section
[08:17] <bazhang> all of them (including my own older ones) removed badfish, badfish69 and thefeds old one
[08:18] <bazhang> always get nervous when doing that, after an xchat bug sent the entire banlist to the #ubuntu window (making me think I had completely cleared the ban list)
[08:19] <bazhang> the ban evasion of today is still in force on killedkillerb
[08:19] <elky_> ah, so there was another redirect
[08:23] <elky> we probably should change that blanket on optusnet to a forward
[08:24] <bazhang> something in the tracker mentioned bots, yet he denied running them
[08:27] <elky_> bazhang, the script he was running is what was referred to as 'bots'
[08:27] <bazhang> elky_, okay I see
[08:27] <elky_> i read the snippits.
[11:21] <elky> fyi all, fujisan is back, and has a real name now... that's neither "japan" or japanese
[14:30] <Seeker`> hi LjL 
[14:33] <LjL> hi
[14:50] <elky_> he's going to do that whenever he realises he's in here
[14:53] <Seeker`> yeah, doesn't surprise me
[14:53] <Seeker`> thought he might
[14:55] <elky> the longer you let him stay in here, the quicker he will 'get over it'
[14:56] <elky> right now he's feeling hawked
[14:56] <elky> and that's not going to help him at all.
[15:35] <ikanobori> 15:44 -!- ikanobori [n=simon@unaffiliated/ikanobori] has left #ubuntu-offtopic [requested by elky: "24 hours ban so you have a chance to review the guidelines. /msg ubottu guidelines"]
[15:35] <ikanobori> 24 hours are done with :)
[15:40] <elky_> next time i catch you being a misogynist, it'll be 168 hours.
[15:41] <ikanobori> Cool!
[15:41] <elky_> i suspect this will not take long.
[17:44] <LjL> err... sorry. i thought i was logged in.
[17:45]  * mneptok drops his pants
[17:49] <mneptok> :(
[18:17] <Flannel> Amaranth: I'm not sure how encouraging that command is productive.
[18:18] <Amaranth> Flannel: I'm just showing them it doesn't even work anymore
[18:19] <Amaranth> Flannel: Hopefully they'll stop trying to trick people into erasing stuff if they know it is pointless
[18:19] <Amaranth> If not, hey, fun facts
[18:19] <Flannel> Amaranth: Except there are places it does work, *and* people are on other distros, etc.
[18:19] <Flannel> You could still accomplish the initial conversation without pasting rm rf root every time you tried it.
[18:20] <Flannel> Amaranth: It's not like the people who are active right now are the ones trying to get random people to do it anyway.
[18:20] <Amaranth> tavish was
[18:21] <Flannel> Amaranth: I'd argue its more likely that they're now going to go to other channels and do it, "Hey, did you guys know this doesn't work anymore?"
[18:21] <Flannel> Amaranth: and then "Well, Amaranth said it was ok!"
[18:22] <Amaranth> I have to admit that would be a bit amusing
[18:22] <Amaranth> Hopefully they're arch users
[18:22] <Flannel> !coc | Amaranth 
[18:22] <Flannel> Stop being an idiot.
[18:23] <Amaranth> When did everyone get so stuffy?
[18:23] <Flannel> Amaranth: When did destroying someone's system become a game?
[18:23] <Amaranth> Hey, I told them it only worked on Ubuntu and Debian
[18:24] <Flannel> Since everyone remembers all the technical details of everything.
[18:24] <Amaranth> Not really my problem there
[18:25] <Flannel> Amaranth: Stop being a dick, seriously.
[18:25] <Amaranth> And that ends this conversation.
[18:28] <Mez> o_O
[19:13] <mneptok> let's all sing "Kum-Bay-Ya"
[19:13]  * genii hums
[19:13] <genii> mneptok: Since I can't sing all that well
[19:15] <mneptok> my singing in the shower usually leads to 911 calls reporting goat emasculation
[19:16] <genii> Heh
[19:26] <Gary> mneptok: haha
[19:30] <balzac> hello
[19:30] <balzac> I'm still patiently waiting for my ban to be lifted from #ubuntu
[19:32] <mneptok> @btlogin
[19:33] <mneptok> @login
[19:36] <mneptok> 2009-04-16T01:39:05 <balzac> LjL: exactly who I was hoping to see.
[19:36] <mneptok> 2009-04-16T01:39:08 <balzac> I won't drop it now
[19:36] <mneptok> and then asking people's ages?
[19:36] <mneptok> like that matters?
[19:37] <mneptok> the ban doesn;t get lifted because time goes by. the ban gets lifted when you stop the behavior.
[19:38] <mneptok> and you haven't, it seems. just a few days ago you were rude and dissmissive to an op asking you to keep on-topic.
[19:38] <mneptok> so ... got any good reasons for the ban to be lifted?
[19:38] <mneptok> other than "time has gone by?"
[19:51] <mneptok> balzac: your silence is deafening
[19:54] <mneptok> balzac: will that be all, then?
[20:07] <ikonia> hello all
[20:08] <jussi01> ikonia: !!!
[20:08] <jussi01> :D
[20:08] <ikonia> hello there
[20:08] <jussi01> you are alive!!
[20:08] <ikonia> how's it going
[20:08] <ikonia> yes, just got home
[20:08] <jussi01> to bath?
[20:08] <ikonia> (well 15 minutes ago) just catching up
[20:08] <ikonia> yes, back in Bath now
[20:08]  * jussi01 grumbles...
[20:08] <ikonia> ?
[20:08] <ikonia> what's up?
[20:09] <jussi01> you never returned my calls/messages
[20:09] <ikonia> from where ?
[20:11] <ikonia> balzac: what's up?
[20:11] <balzac> hello
[20:12] <ikonia> hi
[20:12] <balzac> I mentioned before I was waiting for a decision to be made regarding my ban from #ubuntu
[20:12] <balzac> who here has the authority to make this decision?
[20:12] <ikonia> balzac: any one of the ops who feels your behaviour is correct to re-enter the channel
[20:12] <Seeker`> I think mneptok is still waiting for an answer to his question
[20:13] <Seeker`> what has changed to warrent the ban being removed?
[20:13] <balzac> hopefully your minds have changed in light of the things I wrote laste time I was here
[20:13] <ikonia> all I see is abuse
[20:13] <ikonia> every time you join the channel you have a bad attitude 
[20:14] <ikonia> plus you have a history that also back's up this attitude
[20:15] <balzac> I want to talk about professional conduct, not personality or attitude
[20:15] <mneptok> balzac: then speak when i ask you questions.
[20:15] <ikonia> what is there to talk about ?
[20:15] <balzac> I guess I'll take the issue up with people in Canonical
[20:15] <ikonia> you've said that
[20:15] <Seeker`> balzac: what will canonical do?
[20:15] <mneptok> balzac: go for it. ask Mark Shuttleworth to give me a call. he has my cell number, and i worked for him for 3 years.
[20:16] <ikonia> balzac: if you wish to take it up with the council, I suggest you do so and stop coming in here telling us you'll take it up with the council
[20:16] <balzac> mneptok: mneptok i'm in the middle of work
[20:16] <mneptok> balzac: but i'd advise against it.
[20:16] <balzac> my silence is not deafening
[20:16] <balzac> I'm at work
[20:16] <ikonia> balzac: ok - so I suggest you follow the process
[20:16] <balzac> I don't think I'll bother with the council either
[20:16] <ikonia> balzac: take it up with the council, and leave this channel
[20:16] <ikonia> balzac: ok - then there is nothing more to discuss 
[20:16] <balzac> I may just buy a support license, and then deal with canonical in a professional context
[20:16] <balzac> I'm not a kid at summer camp
[20:16] <ikonia> ok
[20:17] <ikonia> you've said you're not a kid
[20:17] <balzac> I don't want to play your games
[20:17] <ikonia> balzac: ok - bye
[20:17] <balzac> you guys have been quite condescending
[20:17] <mneptok> garbage in, garbage out.
[20:17] <ikonia> balzac: you just can't follow the rules, so lets move on and do you're own thing
[20:17] <balzac> you ought to consider how to treat people who are adults
[20:17] <ikonia> balzac: stop going on about being an adult - act like one
[20:17] <balzac> mneptok: are you calling me garbage?
[20:17] <Seeker`> balzac: you do realise that a support contract with canonical won't automagically grant you access to #ubuntu, yes?
[20:17] <ikonia> there is no point going through this again 
[20:17] <balzac> Seeker`: I do realize that
[20:17] <mneptok> balzac: i'm calling your behavior and attitude garbage,
[20:18] <balzac> But I think you guys ought to act more professional and not hold grudges like a high-school clique
[20:18] <balzac> grow up guys
[20:18]  * mneptok laughs
[20:18] <ikonia> he's obbsessed with not being a kid ???
[20:19] <mneptok> he's all proud and condescending because "i'm in my 30s"
[20:19] <Flannel> ikonia: He's not a child!
[20:19] <ikonia> ha
[20:19] <mneptok> well, puppy-boy, i hit 44 in a month. sit TF down and STFU.
[20:19]  * ikonia waves to balzac reading the logs
[20:19] <Flannel> mneptok: Not a kid!
[20:20] <mneptok> Flannel: but looking forward to crapping my pants again after 65.
[20:20]  * genii remembers to get mneptok some Chateau '65 before then
[20:20] <ikonia> mneptok: why wait
[20:20] <mneptok> ikonia: i'm at a conference. :(
[20:21] <ikonia> hang in until later then
[20:21] <mneptok> although i guess that's a good way to become memorable.
[21:05] <tsimpson> Pricey, jussi01, Pici, nalioth or elky: IRCC ping
[21:05] <nalioth> tsimpson: pong?
[21:06] <tsimpson> nalioth: I'm looking to get some access to the ubuntu-bots launchpad project
[21:06] <jussi01> tsimpson: pong
[21:06] <tsimpson> the IRCC is the maintainer of that project
[21:07] <jussi01> I see no reason why not, nalioth, you?
[21:10] <jussi01> tsimpson: need to chat withthe other members, will get back to yu soon.
[21:11] <tsimpson> ok
[22:18] <Seeker`> qedx: how can we help you?
[22:21] <elky> jussi01, +1
[22:26] <ikonia> @bansearch soc1
[22:29] <ikonia> qedx: hi, do you need some help ?
[22:31] <Seeker`> what do people make of this?
[22:31] <Seeker`> http://pastebin.com/d412f03ff
[22:33] <ikonia> Seeker`: looks like some idiot
[22:33] <Seeker`> try saying something in -uk, see if you get the same thing PMd to you
[22:33] <ikonia> ok
[22:33] <ikonia> yup - remove him
[22:34] <ikonia> that address is also familier
[22:34] <ikonia> it's on my hilight
[22:34] <ikonia> @bansearch ^aDaM_PC
[22:34] <Seeker`> @bansearch ^adam_laptop
[22:35] <ikonia> not really cool to allow that to continue
[22:35] <Seeker`> y7eah
[22:35] <popey> who was that?
[22:35] <Seeker`> ^adam_laptop is the same person
[22:35] <Seeker`> ^aDaM_PC
[22:35] <popey> do you think he knew?
[22:35] <Seeker`> don't know
[22:35] <popey> he's a kid, a rather clueless one at that
[22:35] <Seeker`> but wasn't responding, don't want it being sent to anyone
[22:35] <Seeker`> best to remove him until he can explain himself
[22:36] <popey> sure
[22:36] <Seeker`> @bansearch cpc3-wilm1-0-0-cust915.bagu.cable.ntl.com
[22:36] <Seeker`> blah
[22:36] <ikonia> I've got that address on my old hilights file
[22:37] <Seeker`> any idea why?
[22:37] <ikonia> nope
[22:39] <ikonia> Flannel: you still active
[22:39] <Flannel> Me?
[22:39] <ikonia> Flannel: yup
[22:39] <Flannel> I didn't do it!
[22:40] <ikonia> Flannel: just a heads up I removed cirkit who was the same guy as st0ned, he denied it was him then started with his abuse "fuck you, etc etc" same as you remove him from, some ip/ident/client/channels as st0ned
[22:40] <Flannel> Yeah, I saw that.
[22:41] <ikonia> ahh cool
[22:41] <ikonia> !idle | qedx 
[22:43] <Flannel> ikonia: Oddly, cirkit was in the channel for a long while
[22:43] <ikonia> yup
[22:43] <ikonia> I checked, but, it's the same guy, so tough
[22:51] <ikonia> does anyone know anything about qedx 
[22:51] <Flannel> ikonia: Nope
[22:53] <ikonia> service.....
[22:53] <jussi01> hrm... I should of given reason... meh, nvm
[22:54] <ikonia> he had a few notes in the channel to ask him what was up....
[22:54] <ikonia> bed time I think, night all
[22:54] <jussi01> nini
[22:57] <ikonia> FYI:
[22:57] <ikonia> http://boycottnovell.com/2009/04/17/irc-log-16042009-3/
[22:57] <ikonia> looks like thats the new troll pit, check out the names in there
[23:01] <popey> hah, what a special group of people
[23:02] <jussi01> popey: what ws that ppa again for the 945 stuff?
[23:02] <popey> google xorg edgers
[23:02] <popey> i am not on my main pc right now sorry
[23:07] <popey> that might have looked like jfgi, that wasnt intentional jussi01 
[23:08] <jussi01> hehe
[23:08]  * jussi01 bought some books today :)
[23:16] <Seeker`> jussi01: going to read them?
[23:16] <jussi01> Seeker`: yep...
[23:17] <jussi01> what do you think, I bought them to have on my shelf?
[23:17] <jussi01> :P
[23:17] <jussi01> I bought 7  books :)
[23:17] <jussi01> so it might take me a while
[23:19] <Seeker`> what books?
[23:20] <jussi01> Reminiscences of the cuban revolutionary war, by che guevara, the motorcycle diaries, also by him...
[23:21] <jussi01> U2 by U2
[23:21] <jussi01> Vanishing world - a life of bushcraft, by ray mears
[23:21] <jussi01> Rush, the autobiography - by Ian Rush
[23:22] <jussi01> Band of Brothers, Stephen Ambrose
[23:22] <jussi01> and Planet Football, by Andoni Canela and Rodofo Chisleanschi
[23:22] <jussi01> :)
[23:23] <Seeker`> :)
[23:28] <Flannel> :)
[23:28] <Flannel> What are we smiling about?
[23:35] <Seeker`> Flannel: just stuff
[23:35] <Flannel> Seeker`: Sounds good.
[23:41] <Seeker`> yup
[23:41] <Seeker`> best to smile about stuff
[23:47] <Flannel> band of trolls in #u
[23:48] <Seeker`> eugh, some people should just put their PC back in the box and get a refund
[23:51] <Flannel> Howdy Jordan_U, how can we help you today?
[23:52] <Jordan_U> Flannel, I was wondering if linuxn00b was a troll or really needed help before I feed him
[23:53] <Flannel> Jordan_U: I'm leaning more and more towards troll as we go along.
[23:58] <tsimpson> jussi01: still no "Learning Python" book? ;)
[23:58] <Jordan_U> If he is not a troll it seems like he did stop the command before it finished ( and before it went to far as it would normally give errors early when getting into things like /proc ). So his pictures would possibly still be there
[23:59] <jussi01> tsimpson: nope, thought you were buying that for me... :P