| === abentley1 is now known as abentley | ||
| === abentley1 is now known as abentley | ||
| meoblast001 | hi | 05:38 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | meoblast001: hello | 05:38 |
| meoblast001 | i filed this bug a few days ago https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/363217 | 05:39 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 363217 in launchpad "Banned From My Mailing List" [Undecided,New] | 05:39 |
| meoblast001 | can i just be unbanned from my mailing list | 05:39 |
| meoblast001 | i don't think i can remain banned until the bug is fixed | 05:39 |
| meoblast001 | i'd just have to ditch launchpad mailing lists and find someone new if that happens | 05:39 |
| mwhudson | not by me | 05:41 |
| mwhudson | meoblast001: can you ask a question at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad ? | 05:41 |
| meoblast001 | mwhudson: wouldn't that be comparable to filing 2 bugs though? | 05:41 |
| mwhudson | meoblast001: not really | 05:42 |
| mwhudson | we use answers more for actions and bugs for defects | 05:42 |
| spm | meoblast001: the last mesage on that list was sent by you on the 15th of April. Have you tried sending any more since? even a test one? far as I can see, you're still active and working. | 05:43 |
| meoblast001 | spm: i could try | 05:43 |
| meoblast001 | spm: oh.. nice.. it worked | 05:45 |
| meoblast001 | spm: is there a limit on how many emails i can send? | 05:46 |
| spm | meoblast001: what do you mean? to a list? as fast as you can type I'd suggest. | 05:46 |
| meoblast001 | spm: oh.. it told me i was banned because i sent too many emails | 05:46 |
| meoblast001 | that was the reason when it banned me | 05:47 |
| spm | actually no it doesn't say that. it suggests you would be disabled for excessive bouces. different problem. | 05:47 |
| meoblast001 | ahh.. ic | 05:47 |
| meoblast001 | what are bounces? | 05:47 |
| mwhudson | basically mailman thought it sent you mail that got rejected by your mail server | 05:49 |
| meoblast001 | mwhudson: ic | 05:49 |
| meoblast001 | i'm so happy i filed that feature request on Ubuntu's Idea Pool (back when it was called that) to add screenlets.... so much easier to install now | 05:50 |
| * meoblast001 thinks there should be a #launchpad-offtopic | 05:51 | |
| === Andre_Gondim is now known as Andre_Gondim-afk | ||
| RAOF | Hm. Is it possible to build a kernel flavour in the PPA build system? It seems to die with make error 2, which IIRC is "you've run out of disc space". | 09:07 |
| RAOF | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25777812/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.linux_2.6.28-11.43~ppa2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 09:07 |
| cprov | RAOF: let me check. | 09:08 |
| cprov | RAOF: I don't remember if error 2 is disk space, but 'Build needed 00:34:08, 3071656k disk space ' indicates it might be. | 09:11 |
| RAOF | 3GB? Neat. | 09:12 |
| RAOF | Does this mean I can't build that in the PPA system? | 09:12 |
| cprov | RAOF: other people have been building kernels in PPA, let me check for something different. | 09:13 |
| RAOF | Thanks. | 09:13 |
| cprov | RAOF: what about https://edge.launchpad.net/~next-kernel/+archive/ppa/+build/847711 ? | 09:16 |
| cprov | RAOF: it uses 11GB | 09:16 |
| RAOF | Wow. So, why doesn't mine build then :) | 09:16 |
| cprov | RAOF: the builder itself, I guess | 09:17 |
| wgrant | Error 2 is ENOENT, IIRC. | 09:17 |
| wgrant | Oh. *make* error. I fail. | 09:17 |
| cprov | RAOF: I've retried your build, this time it went to a 'older' virtual build, let's see how it goes. | 09:27 |
| RAOF | cprov: Thanks. | 09:27 |
| cprov | RAOF: what's was the name of the builder where it was previously built ? (lost the browser tab by mistake) | 09:29 |
| cprov | RAOF: it is in the build-failure-notification. | 09:29 |
| RAOF | cprov: platinum. Sorry for the delay. | 09:39 |
| cprov | RAOF: np, thanks. | 09:39 |
| === mkorn is now known as thekorn | ||
| === noodles775 changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: noodles775 | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | karma count change: http://blog.launchpad.net/general/karma-where-did-mine-go | ||
| Hobbsee | gmb: thanks :) | 10:39 |
| gmb | Hobbsee: Welcome. Now we need to find some time to include it a cycle... | 10:39 |
| Hobbsee | gmb: how long would it realistically take? | 10:39 |
| gmb | Hobbsee: < 1 day, including tests, based on the last time I added a header to emails. | 10:40 |
| gmb | Hobbsee: Trouble is that we're all working on really complex stuff at the minute. | 10:40 |
| gmb | So we're pretty pressed for time. | 10:40 |
| Hobbsee | gmb: heh. Like always :) | 10:40 |
| gmb | Hobbsee: Yeah. UI is hard :/ | 10:40 |
| mwhudson | yeah, i yearn for the days when i got to work on really easy stuff! | 10:40 |
| Hobbsee | although is looking much nicer :) | 10:40 |
| cprov | RAOF: almost forgot of our test build, https://edge.launchpad.net/~raof/+archive/ppa/+build/954694, it failed again. Apparently in the same place. | 10:58 |
| cprov | RAOF: so, it's probably something in the source itself. Can you please seek assistance with the kernel-team ? | 10:59 |
| Whoopie | cprov: Hi, is this bug fixed on the live launchpad system? -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/357034 | 11:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 357034 in soyuz "Binary packages rejected based on debian/control Section" [High,Fix committed] | 11:03 |
| RAOF | cprov: Urgh. Sorry. I thought it had built locally. | 11:03 |
| cprov | Whoopie: no, it will be fixed in the next rollout (2.2.4) | 11:05 |
| Whoopie | cprov: ok, thanks | 11:05 |
| Whoopie | just wanted to be sure as I try to build a custom kernel ;) | 11:05 |
| cprov | Whoopie: is it affecting your workflow badly ? | 11:05 |
| Whoopie | cprov: no, I know the workaround. | 11:06 |
| cprov | Whoopie: okay. | 11:06 |
| cprov | RAOF: maybe it does, someone from the kernel-team would know for sure what's going on with our virtual buildds. | 11:08 |
| wgrant | cprov: Why have I(D)SPR not been exposed through the API? And how are builds internally associated with source packages - by archive and SPR? I'd ideally like to be able to get more complete data. | 11:11 |
| cprov | wgrant: right, I'm about to confirm your branch. | 11:16 |
| wgrant | cprov: s/branch/bug/? | 11:16 |
| cprov | wgrant: ISPPH.getBuilds & getPublishedBinaries will be exposed | 11:16 |
| cprov | wgrant: yes, *bug* ;) | 11:17 |
| wgrant | cprov: Ah, ISPPH.getBuilds is already there. I missed that. | 11:19 |
| cprov | wgrant: cool, but SPPH.getPublishedBinaries -> IBPPHs isn't | 11:19 |
| wgrant | Right. | 11:20 |
| cprov | wgrant: also, the root problem is not been about to access SPR/BPR attributes (build-deps, deps, etc) | 11:20 |
| wgrant | cprov: Doesn't a Build only know about its BPRs, not any BPPHs? | 11:21 |
| wgrant | Given that a build is somewhat publishing-agnostic. | 11:21 |
| cprov | wgrant: yes, builds are publishing-agnostic | 11:21 |
| cprov | but SPPH should expose SPR attributes, same for BPPH (BPR) | 11:22 |
| wgrant | Why not expose the real [BS]PR? | 11:22 |
| cprov | maybe ... but they would need a new traversal, because they are also pub-agnostic ;) | 11:23 |
| wgrant | Although I suppose my main use for them will be fulfilled by methods that deal in publishings instead. They're just not all there yet. | 11:23 |
| wgrant | Mmmm, true. | 11:23 |
| wgrant | Forgot that. | 11:23 |
| cprov | wgrant: anyway, baby-steps, let's expose SPPH.getPublishedBinaries first, it's simple | 11:24 |
| wgrant | cprov: That sounds good. | 11:24 |
| cprov | wgrant: confirmed, will be in edge tonight | 11:25 |
| wgrant | cprov: Is (archive, name, version) for an [SB]PR really a unique key? I thought I saw a bug somewhere about duplicate binary versions causing problems, which would indicate it was ambiguous. | 11:25 |
| cprov | wgrant: (archive, name, version, Published) is unique | 11:26 |
| wgrant | (that key is the only one we have to distinguish the actual package referred to by a publishing) | 11:26 |
| wgrant | cprov: Right, but we don't have that last bit. | 11:26 |
| wgrant | I guess it's a tiny corner case that I can live with. | 11:27 |
| cprov | wgrant: that 4-elem key defines the publishing record, then SPPH.spr | 11:27 |
| wgrant | cprov: SPPH.spr doesn't exist to normal people. | 11:27 |
| cprov | wgrant: exactly :) | 11:27 |
| cprov | wgrant: that's why we can either export SPR as /+source/$ID or incorporate its attributes in SPPH | 11:28 |
| cprov | wgrant: I will investigate what's the best approach when I come back from lunch. | 11:28 |
| wgrant | cprov: Thanks! | 11:29 |
| * cprov goes | 11:29 | |
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === noodles775 is now known as noodles775-afk | ||
| === noodles775-afk is now known as noodles | ||
| === noodles is now known as noodles775 | ||
| === jelmer_ is now known as Guest60279 | ||
| cr3 | bug #175782 appears in my own personal bugs but I get a "lost something" page when trying to reach it | 15:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 175782 in checkbox-desktop "include field in configuration file should support more than one file" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/175782 | 15:08 |
| james_w | just https://launchpad.net/checkbox-desktop exhibits the problem as well (OOPS-1206ED125 for the same on edge) | 15:15 |
| noodles775 | james_w: strange... wfm? | 15:16 |
| mthaddon | james_w: the project has been made inactive | 15:16 |
| james_w | that'll probably be why then :-) | 15:17 |
| noodles775 | yup! | 15:17 |
| noodles775 | cr3: all good then? | 15:18 |
| wgrant | IIRC there is a bug filed that bugs filed only in an inactive project should be hidden. | 15:22 |
| cr3 | noodles775: I wouldn't qualify "lost something" as "all good", no | 15:28 |
| cr3 | james_w: the project was deleted but it seems the bugs were left dangling | 15:29 |
| noodles775 | Sorry cr3: I meant to communicate: "did you see the reason discussed here causing your problem" but did so poorly. | 15:29 |
| cr3 | mthaddon: could all the related bugs be deleted or reassigned then? leaving them dangling is not optimal :) | 15:30 |
| cr3 | this sounds like the equivalent to leaving the database in an inconsistent state, isn't there somekind of foreign key constraint which should kick in here? | 15:31 |
| wgrant | cr3: The project isn't deleted. | 15:31 |
| wgrant | Projects are only ever deactivated, which is sometimes called deletion. | 15:31 |
| wgrant | So it's not *really* gone. | 15:31 |
| cr3 | wgrant: aha! inactive, so inaccessible, so constraint wouldn't kick in | 15:31 |
| mthaddon | yeah, what he said | 15:31 |
| wgrant | Right. | 15:31 |
| wgrant | So, the bug should not be shown in listings, nor should the redirect at /bugs/123456 work. Those are bugs. | 15:32 |
| cr3 | ok, so I need to report a bug against launchpad then :) | 15:32 |
| wgrant | I know there's one already for the latter, but I'm not sure about the former. | 15:33 |
| cr3 | wgrant: I was going to report a but against the former but I will mention the latter side effect | 15:33 |
| cr3 | err, s/but/bug/ | 15:35 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| kwah | hi all | 15:52 |
| noodles775 | Hi kwah | 15:53 |
| kwah | is reactivation feature for maillists broken in launchpad? | 15:53 |
| noodles775 | barry ^^^ | 15:53 |
| kwah | this morning I finally wanted to activate again mailing list for ~ubuntu-ru-users group | 15:54 |
| kwah | and since then I see message: This team's mailing list will be available within a few minutes. | 15:54 |
| kwah | since then == approx 05:30 UTC tosay | 15:54 |
| kwah | *today | 15:54 |
| kwah | any comments on this? | 15:54 |
| barry | kwah: it should be working but there may be a problem with your list. please file a question and we'll look into it | 16:10 |
| kwah | barry, will do. May you give an indication how long it might take? | 16:18 |
| noodles775 | kwah: if you add a question, it'll generally be assigned and answered within a 24hr period. | 16:19 |
| kwah | ok | 16:19 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| kwah | noodles775, barry https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/68038 | 16:27 |
| noodles775 | Thanks kwah, I'll assign it... | 16:28 |
| kwah | thanks | 16:28 |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| ripps | Strange, a package has building in the gmpc-trunk for 7 hours. It takes about 10 minutes to build normally. https://edge.launchpad.net/~gmpc-trunk/+archive/ppa | 16:52 |
| cprov | ripps: the builder that was building it was disabled, I will fix it for you in a minute. | 16:59 |
| ripps | cprov: Thanks | 17:07 |
| === noodles775 changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | karma count change: http://blog.launchpad.net/general/karma-where-did-mine-go | ||
| cprov | ripps: it will be dispatched in a bit, the problem will be fixed by bug #343683 | 17:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 343683 in soyuz "PPA buildds can be reclaimed mid-build, master needs to recover more gracefully when they do" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/343683 | 17:15 |
| barry | kwah: it should take at most 5-10 minutes to reactivate your list, so the fact that it hasn't yet is a problem | 17:49 |
| kwah | barry, yep, I kinda noticed ;) | 17:52 |
| barry | kwah: i'm try to get a losa's attention and have them help me look into it | 17:52 |
| kwah | barry, thanks | 17:53 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| adrian15b | Hi. I have recently created a new repository (ppa) in launchpad. http://ppa.launchpad.net/adrian15/fai/ . Now an user asks me how it can be build amd64 versions of the packages from my repository. So after checking my repository I see that all the packages architecture is "all". I thought that "all" was only for images (i.e. themes) packages. Did I do something wrong? Is it ok? How do I answer the amd64 question? Thank you. | 20:39 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: all is for platform independent, images qualify, or say pure python packages. | 20:40 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: that's part of your packaging though | 20:40 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: I already know that. So I made a mistake when I build my packages? | 20:40 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: specifically with debian/control, yes | 20:41 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: I'm assuming it isn't actually an Architecture: all package? | 20:42 |
| adrian15b | adrian15b: No, it is not. | 20:46 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: :) | 20:46 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: well then, change it to 'any' instead :) Or a relevant list of architectures if that may be the case. | 20:47 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: I am going to check the control contents from the repository and copy it into a pastebin.com like site. | 20:48 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: k | 20:49 |
| * LarstiQ goes search for mail from his bank he displaced | 20:49 | |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: Well the package is all. | 20:51 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: Because it is main script made. I had not realised it till now. | 20:51 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: So I tell the guy that it is platform indepedent and that's it. | 20:51 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: well yes, in that case nothing wrong with it | 20:53 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: Althoug I do no know if live-initramfs and initramfs-tools are platform independent. | 20:53 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: you could check what Debian/Ubuntu do? | 20:53 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: Yes, they are. | 20:54 |
| karim | hi, I have an upload problem on launchpad ppa, it fails at the end v4l-dvb-dkms_1.20090413-ppa3.tar.gz: 4226k/4227k | 20:54 |
| adrian15b | LarstiQ: Ok. It was easier than I thought. Thank you for your help. | 20:54 |
| LarstiQ | adrian15b: np, I didn't do much :) | 20:54 |
| karim | I mean it's stuck just before the last bites are sent | 20:54 |
| karim | this happens to last packages I tried to sent | 20:55 |
| karim | with no error message, they are of course not on the ppa at all | 20:55 |
| LarstiQ | karim: does this happen with other hosts too? | 20:55 |
| karim | LarstiQ: what other host ? | 20:55 |
| LarstiQ | (ie, isolate where the problems lie) | 20:55 |
| LarstiQ | karim: random other ftp server? | 20:56 |
| karim | ??? | 20:56 |
| karim | what other ftp server | 20:56 |
| LarstiQ | karim: you're uploading with dput, right? | 20:56 |
| karim | fqdn= ppa.launchpad.net | 20:56 |
| karim | method= ftp | 20:56 |
| karim | I only ave this | 20:57 |
| LarstiQ | karim: no incoming defined? | 20:57 |
| karim | where else can I upload ? | 20:57 |
| karim | incoming= ~mirak-mirak/ubuntu | 20:57 |
| karim | login= anonymous | 20:57 |
| karim | plus [mirak] for the section | 20:57 |
| LarstiQ | karim: mentors.debian.net for dput | 20:57 |
| LarstiQ | karim: but the main point is trying to find out where the problem lies | 20:58 |
| karim | I can't upload there I guess | 20:58 |
| karim | it was a hassel already to upload on launchpad ^^ | 20:58 |
| LarstiQ | karim: you could also employ strace and tcpdump for more diagnostics | 20:59 |
| LarstiQ | karim: have you waited a while to see if it would complete? | 21:00 |
| cprov | karim: I've seen it happen with other big files like that | 21:00 |
| cprov | karim: let me check what the log files says in the server. | 21:01 |
| karim | cprov: thanks | 21:01 |
| karim | I also tried to upload nvidia drivers 2 times | 21:01 |
| karim | it failed at the end also | 21:01 |
| karim | LarstiQ: yes | 21:01 |
| cprov | karim: try now, please | 21:01 |
| karim | the upload ? | 21:02 |
| karim | ok | 21:02 |
| cprov | karim: yup | 21:02 |
| cprov | karim: is your uplink *fast* enough ? | 21:02 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| karim | 1Mbit | 21:03 |
| karim | cprov: it's sending | 21:04 |
| karim | I had a checksum issue, I needed to rebuild the sources | 21:04 |
| cprov | karim: it already failed on the server side, apparently. | 21:04 |
| karim | what version ? | 21:04 |
| karim | cprov: it's still uploading on my side | 21:04 |
| karim | 2717k/4227k | 21:05 |
| cprov | karim: you upload is long dead, you can try it again, | 21:06 |
| karim | it started | 21:07 |
| karim | cprov: is it working ? | 21:08 |
| karim | cprov: maybe I should use passive or active ftp ? | 21:08 |
| cprov | karim: there are few simultaneous sessions in progress | 21:09 |
| karim | stuck again | 21:09 |
| cprov | karim: it should be stuck on your side ? server side it's fine and will be processed in 2 min | 21:13 |
| karim | the server got the full archive ? | 21:13 |
| cprov | karim: yes | 21:14 |
| cprov | karim: no, I lied ;/ | 21:16 |
| LarstiQ | cprov: any idea what's going on? | 21:16 |
| cprov | karim: the tarball is there, MD5 and size matches, the upload is missing the .changes (which makes it pretty much useless) | 21:17 |
| cprov | LarstiQ: not exactly, but is likely to be something client-side. | 21:18 |
| cprov | karim: I've download your source and re-uploaded with dput and it was fine. | 21:21 |
| karim | that's weird | 21:26 |
| karim | cprov: I don't see them on my ppa though | 21:27 |
| karim | cprov: are you sure you got the whole archive ? | 21:27 |
| cprov | karim: yes, I vaguely remember of cisco/linksys routers doing something bad for long ftp sessions | 21:27 |
| karim | it's a buffalo | 21:28 |
| karim | there is no other method to upload ? | 21:28 |
| cprov | karim: https://edge.launchpad.net/~cprov/+archive/ppa?field.name_filter=v4l&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=any | 21:28 |
| karim | cprov: what is the md5sum on it ? | 21:28 |
| karim | cprov: it doesn't show up on my ppa | 21:30 |
| cprov | karim: I can't upload to your ppa, so I've uploaded to mine | 21:30 |
| karim | cprov: yes, but if you got my file entirely, why isn't it proceced ? | 21:31 |
| cprov | karim: because the .changes was never uploaded. | 21:31 |
| karim | cprov: so the .changes might be the problem ? | 21:32 |
| karim | I have a strange issue here | 21:32 |
| cprov | karim: dsc and tar.gz were fine and the md5 matched, but apparently your dput never found out that the tarball had finished | 21:32 |
| karim | I create a deb from source, and build it, however sometime it says the checksum isn't correct | 21:32 |
| cprov | karim: no, you files a probably correct, the problem is something in the connection | 21:32 |
| jcole | how can i cross compile a debian package on ubuntu to x86_64/amd64 from an x86/i386 machine? | 21:53 |
| jcole | before i upload to ppa | 21:53 |
| cprov | jcole: you don't need to build the binaries, upload the source and the PPA will build the binaries for you. | 21:54 |
| jcole | cprov: understood, but i have some packages im not "allowed" to upload to ppa :/ | 21:56 |
| cprov | jcole: oh, I see | 21:56 |
| cprov | jcole: `debuild -b -aamd64` (works for i386, I'm on amd64) | 21:58 |
| jcole | cprov: did you dpkg -x the .deb file and do a "file" on a .so file? the bits still compile to local arch even though the package says the specified arch | 22:00 |
| cprov | jcole: no, I didn't | 22:01 |
| jcole | cprov: your .so files in that created .deb are probably 64 bit | 22:01 |
| geser | jcole: build for amd64 on i386 won't work (at least not that easy) as the i386-kernel can't run amd64-binaries (like e.g. gcc) | 22:01 |
| cprov | jcole: which would obviously go boing in a 32bit system | 22:02 |
| jcole | geser: understood, but ive seen people cross compile on debian to strange arches like hppa on an i386 box | 22:02 |
| geser | they probably use qemu | 22:03 |
| jcole | geser: no, its something with a gcc cross compile toolchan | 22:03 |
| karim | jcole: you better use qemu | 22:03 |
| karim | jcole: cross compilation is really not easy, and if you want to do packages it will be hell certainly | 22:04 |
| geser | jcole: but you also need an upstream source that builds correctly with a cross-compiler (good luck with that) | 22:04 |
| karim | geser: yes ^^ | 22:04 |
| karim | can I upload a .deb on ppa ? | 22:05 |
| cprov | karim: no, it's not allowed. | 22:05 |
| karim | cprov: I use dput locally | 22:06 |
| karim | I found a way to upload to a local repository | 22:06 |
| * jcole finds http://www.emdebian.org/tools/crossdev.html | 22:06 | |
| karim | I do that to upload to my own repository | 22:06 |
| jcole | that says how to cross compile to arm without qemu | 22:07 |
| karim | jcole: I tried once to do a cross compiler for gentoo, to build for ppc on x86 it was very hard, even on gentoo | 22:07 |
| karim | I managed to do distcc on a different arch though | 22:07 |
| jcole | karim: there is some "debian" way of doing this | 22:08 |
| jcole | maybe i should pop over to deb dev | 22:08 |
| karim | my upload still fail on ppa :( | 22:08 |
| karim | I don't know what to do | 22:09 |
| karim | I will try without the router | 22:09 |
| jcole | karim: its a basic ftp upload | 22:09 |
| jcole | karim: first validate the ftp connection and an "ls" | 22:10 |
| jcole | karim: could be something with ftp active/passive | 22:10 |
| karim | I am in | 22:10 |
| karim | jcole: I tryed active | 22:11 |
| karim | passive_ftp = 0 | 22:11 |
| karim | ls gives nothing | 22:11 |
| jcole | karim: set the DMZ ip in your router to point to your upload machine | 22:12 |
| cprov | karim: `ls` will return nothing until will upload something, each upload session is isolated from the rest of the system | 22:13 |
| karim | cprov: I am tryng to put the files manually | 22:16 |
| karim | seems stuck also | 22:16 |
| karim | on the big one | 22:16 |
| jcole | karim: did you try DMZ setting? | 22:16 |
| karim | jcole: don't know how to do that | 22:16 |
| karim | I use a buffalo with ddwrt | 22:16 |
| geser | karim: do you have a shell account somewhere where you could try to copy the files there first and dput/ftp from there? | 22:18 |
| karim | I found it | 22:19 |
| karim | geser: no | 22:19 |
| karim | a remote computer maybe, but it's probably powered off | 22:19 |
| karim | jcole: dmz stuff worked | 22:23 |
| karim | jcole: so I maybe need to find what port allowed that | 22:23 |
| karim | I even uploaded .debs ... ^^ | 22:24 |
| jcole | karim: its a dynamic set of ports that connect "back" to you... dmz basically lets all prots in | 22:25 |
| jcole | ports* | 22:25 |
| karim | there is a setting caalled spi firewall, maybe this is dissrupting | 22:26 |
| karim | or port trigering maybe | 22:27 |
| === Andre_Gondim is now known as Andre_Gondim-afk | ||
| karim | jcole: I found a page where it says it the fault of a too short tcp timeout | 22:35 |
| === karim is now known as mirak | ||
| === Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo | ||
| syke | hi | 23:25 |
| bittin__3 | hi | 23:25 |
| syke | I noticed a bug introduced in the diffs for pmccave-2.5 | 23:25 |
| syke | pmccabe, rather | 23:25 |
| syke | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19404556/pmccabe_2.4%2Bnmu1_2.5.diff.gz | 23:25 |
| syke | -echo "\nAnalyzing $newdir ...\c" >&2 | 23:25 |
| syke | +prnitf "\nAnalyzing %s ..." "$newdir" >&2 | 23:25 |
| syke | the second line should be "printf" | 23:26 |
| syke | are there any contributos who can check in a fix? | 23:27 |
| ripps | What the hell is up with the Launchpad builder? It telling me it's going to take 16 hours until it starts building? | 23:50 |
| spm | ripps: 235 builds waiting in the queue? I'd assume that it'll take a while to get through all that first. | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!