[00:59] <VK7HSE> Has anyone tested 9.04RC server intall yet?
[01:02] <giovani> VK7HSE: the installer itself? no, I used the beta installer a few days ago
[01:02] <giovani> but my packages are up-to-date with the RC now
[01:03]  * ScottK did an upgrade.
[01:03] <VK7HSE> I have a PC here I was about to give it a whirl on...
[01:04] <giovani> VK7HSE: vms are handy and fast :)
[01:05] <VK7HSE> they're fine but I have some real hardware I want to test ;-)
[01:05] <giovani> heh
[01:05] <giovani> real hardware is on its way out
[01:05] <giovani> except as a hypervisor base :)
[01:06] <JanC> VK7HSE: sometimes if you want to use a PC as a home server it's beter to install the -generic kernel instead of the -server kernel
[01:06] <JanC> especially if it's older hardware
[01:07] <VK7HSE> We'll soon find out!
[01:07] <JanC> or if you want to connect typical desktop-hardware to it  ツ
[01:37] <PhotoJim> JanC: "better" and "older" meaning what?  (not a snide question as it probably sounds, just curious)
[01:38] <PhotoJim> whois janc
[01:38] <PhotoJim> oops :)
[01:39] <JanC> PhotoJim: the desktop kernel (-generic) includes drivers for some older hardware as well as hardware that's typical for desktops but not for servers
[01:40] <PhotoJim> JanC: Okay.  My server is older but is actual server hardware.  dual 1 GHz PIII CPUs.  Old enough not to have PCIx.  I used the server kernel on it, and all seems well.
[01:40] <JanC> those drivers were left out of the -server kernels because they are mostly useless on real servers and in some cases because they have problems with PAE IIRC
[01:40] <PhotoJim> JanC: I can see why desktop-specific hardware is probably better served by a normal kernel.
[01:41] <PhotoJim> JanC: with PAE?
[01:41] <JanC> a way for 32-bit hardware to use > 4 GiB of RAM
[01:41] <JanC> I think P3's don't have PAE
[01:42] <PhotoJim> what is PAE?
[01:42] <PhotoJim> Oh, ok
[01:42] <PhotoJim> sorry, I didn't click that the line before was explaining it.
[01:43] <PhotoJim> this machine maxes out at 2 GiB of RAM, so PAE would serve no purpose.
[01:43] <PhotoJim> I guess the short answer is, if it's working well, I'm fine.
[01:43] <JanC> right, I think PAE was introduced with P4-based Xeons
[01:44] <PhotoJim> that makes sense.
[01:44] <JanC> to allow 32-bit servers to remain competitive in the market  ;)
[01:45] <PhotoJim> well, good information.  and stuff I didn't realize :)
[02:22] <VK7HSE> All is good! what I want to work... just works :D (9.04RC-Server)
[02:34] <android6011> I want to setup a server that I can just use Wake on Lan, so I can have it start up as needed. When the system is not awake what mode is it in? Hibernate, sleep? what
[02:36] <twb> android6011: that depends on what state you put it in.
[02:37] <twb> android6011: I imagine it would typically be in P0 (i.e. off).
[02:37] <android6011> twb, so I can have the system off and have it turn on when I need that way?
[02:37] <twb> That's the POINT of wake-on-lan.
[02:37] <android6011> Ok, I wasn't sure if it only worked when the system was sleeping
[02:41] <twb> It's possible I have misunderstood; I never got WOL working
[02:42] <twb> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wake_on_lan
[02:42] <twb> "The computer to be woken is shut down (Sleeping, Hibernating or Soft Off, i.e. ACPI state G1 or G2)"
[02:43] <twb> "P0" was gibberish, sorry.
[02:56] <twb> I have a headless LTS server that needs to run one fully virtualized system (Windows, for payroll), and a number of paravirtualized systems, which need only a virtual root and network stack.  Obviously KVM should be used for Windows, but for the paravirtual systems, would you recommend KVM anyway, Xen, OpenVZ, or something else?
[05:37] <twb> Given a restrictive firewall, how do I whitelist NFS?
[05:37] <twb> ISTR it uses random port allocations, i.e. "exciting!"
[06:11] <foxbuntu> twb, it should just need 2049 tcp and 2049 udo
[06:11] <foxbuntu> udp that is*
[06:20] <twb> Research shows that rquotad and such don't default to a single port, though
[06:20] <twb> I'm about to test http://wiki.debian.org/SecuringNFS
[08:46] <kraut> moin
[08:54] <maswan> thank you for being much less pokey than centos for security updates! :)
[09:17] <geronimo`> Good morning everybody. I wanted to hear some opinions about shared calendars. I would like to run a shared calendar with some kind of login and something that is compatible to sunbird and evolution. Is there something like an ultimate solution for this?
[09:19] <cemc> geronimo`: I tried one google calendar with sunbird, but just for a bit of testing, nothing serious
[09:20] <cemc> and I remember thunderbird having a calendar addon which works too
[09:20] <geronimo`> okay, I'd like to host the service myself and not rely on google in this case
[09:20] <geronimo`> Yeah, I know. The plugin for Thunderbird and Sunbird are actually quite the same
[09:20] <cemc> geronimo`: yeah, I would like that too :) if you find anything, please let me know
[09:21] <geronimo`> cemc, http://www.ubuntugeek.com/howto-setup-a-remote-calendar-using-webdav-with-mozilla-sunbird.html <- this is what I found so far
[09:21] <cemc> is it any good ?
[09:31] <geronimo`> I've made a mistake
[09:32] <geronimo`> so I have to re-do one steo
[09:32] <geronimo`> step*, after that I will tell
[11:07] <whalesalad> Hello all. I work for a small startup and we have a contractor who needs access to one of our staging servers to modify a blog. I don't want to give him full server access (to protect our application source) but I would like to give him SSH/SFTP access to a specific directory. It appears one way to do this is with chroot, but that solution seems a bit intense. All I really want to do is prevent him from viewing our applicati
[11:12] <mitman> My office server is crapping out, the root dir is saying no more disk space, but I just backed up the entire root and the tar file is much less than the space allocated for /
[11:13] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, what does df -h tell you?
[11:23] <mitman> Kamping_Kaiser it says full, but I don't understand why
[11:24] <mitman> can I paste my df and du to you, then you may know what is going on here?
[11:25] <Kamping_Kaiser> !pastebin
[11:25] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, ^^ into there, sure
[11:26] <mitman> alright, check this out http://paste.ubuntu.com/154600/
[11:26] <mitman> i posted my df info and the du underneath it.. doesn't make sense :-(
[11:27] <mitman> Kamping_Kaiser: I think I figured out the issue.. but is another problem
[11:29] <Kamping_Kaiser> df -h would have been nicer (for the record :))
[11:29] <Kamping_Kaiser> the ldap* dirs look big enough (with the system paths) to fill the disk
[11:30] <mitman> Kamping_Kaiser: /ldapbackup and /ldapdata are two sepearate partitions
[11:30] <mitman> but seems that ldapbackup (holds my nightly snapshots) is not mounting during boot
[11:30] <mitman> and during boot I get an error UUID is incorrect for that parition
[11:30] <mitman> but fdisk shows the partition
[11:32] <Kamping_Kaiser> right, so they are meant to be seperate, but are not (yet )
[11:33] <mitman> yeah.. but they used to be
[11:33] <mitman> during boot /dev/sdb6 used to boot under /ldapbackup
[11:33] <mitman> but lately i seems like it stopped
[11:33] <Kamping_Kaiser> can you pastebin `cat /etc/fstab` and `sudo fdisk -l`
[11:33] <mitman> i just tried mounting /dev/sdb6 under /tmp/test and it says drive already mounted or busy
[11:34] <mitman> sure
[11:34] <mitman> http://paste.ubuntu.com/154602/
[11:35] <Kamping_Kaiser> sigh. I hate UUID mounts :(
[11:35] <mitman> please also note, /dev/sda and /dev/sdb are supposed to be in RAID, i disconnected the second drives because I believe one of the drives is corrupt
[11:36] <mitman> sda has a RAID1 and sdb has a RAID1, I disconnects the two drives from the server.. hope to fix this then mirror them again
[11:36] <mitman> I hope you can help, I just really don't want to configure openldap again :-(
[11:38] <Kamping_Kaiser> you disconnected the drives?
[11:38] <mitman> yes, during boot i kept getting fsck errors
[11:38] <Kamping_Kaiser> i assume they are software raided? did you ask the software about the drives status(s)?
[11:38] <mitman> it was software raided during installation, i tried asking status using mdadm but it was not installed
[11:38] <mitman> when i tried apt-get, drive is full could not install
[11:39] <mitman> now i am realizing /ldapbackup is not mounted and my backups are filling the root partition
[11:39] <mitman> so basically my solution would need to be /ldapbackup has to mount, then remirror the drives
[11:40] <mitman> Any idea how to make it mount, I get that UUID error during bootup
[11:41] <Kamping_Kaiser> you could remount it with `mount` after booting
[11:41] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, move the backups into /home/ until you have things fixed up
[11:41] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, theres no good reason to have heaps of room in /home/ and DoS your own /
[11:41] <mitman> Kamping_Kaiser: let me try to mount it to /tmp/test, i'll paste the output
[11:43] <mitman> Kamping_Kaiser: no luck, says wrong fs type
[11:45] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, what command did you run?
[11:45] <mitman> Kamping_Kaiser: would fsck /dev/sdb6 do anything to fix the partition
[11:45] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, also, `tail -n 30 /var/log/syslog` may give you a bit more clue about the mounting issue
[11:46] <Kamping_Kaiser> mitman, with the correct options. _make_ _sure_ its unmounted
[11:47] <mitman> alright
[11:47] <mitman> let me try that
[11:47] <mitman> it says device busy
[11:47] <mitman> totally confused
[11:48] <Kamping_Kaiser> unfortunately i'm not sure how to map those uuids to device ids
[11:48] <Kamping_Kaiser> so i dont know how to work out which uuid == which device == which mount point
[11:48] <mitman> I don't mind losing the data in sdb6
[11:48] <mitman> can i format it and have it remount as /ldapbackup?
[11:49] <mitman> the command blkid shows the mapping, but that specific uuid is not showing up in that
[11:52] <sebbasman> hi
[11:53] <sebbasman> I've configured the sendmail service at ubuntu..but I'having a permissions problem
[11:53] <sebbasman> with access
[11:53] <sebbasman> access.db
[11:53] <sebbasman> "makemap: error opening type hash map /etc/mail/access.new.db: Permission denied"
[11:54] <sebbasman> then I touch access.new.db
[11:54] <sebbasman> everything seems to work..but..
[11:54] <sebbasman> it isnt
[11:54] <sebbasman> mail.log
[11:54] <sebbasman> says : hash map "access": unsafe map file /etc/mail/access.db
[11:54] <sebbasman> any clues?
[12:07] <mitman> say i have /dev/hda and /dev/hdb I want /dev/hdb to be together in software raid with /dev/hda, how do I go about doing that?
[12:08] <mitman> FYI, /dev/hda and /dev/hdb used to be in software raid, but i disconnected hdb, did some changes on hda, and now want to make hdb match hda (does that make sense?)
[12:14] <cemc> mitman: if you put back hdb, it should auto sync
[12:14] <mitman> cemc: so it means it will "sense" which one has the newer data
[12:15] <cemc> it should, yea. I'm assuming it's raid1 (mirror) right?
[12:15] <cemc> and you didn't change hdb separately, only hda ?
[12:15] <mitman> cemc: yes it is.. but its not hardware raid
[12:15] <mitman> cemc: i disconnected hdb and am doing some stuff on hda
[12:15] <cemc> if you put hdb back, you should see the sync progress in /proc/mdstat
[12:15] <mitman> i didn't know if the problem was raid related or drive specific
[12:16] <cemc> if you look in /proc/mdstat now, you should have a degraded raid
[12:16] <cemc> where you have something like [U_]
[12:16] <mitman> i don't have a mdstat
[12:16] <cemc> hmm
[12:16] <mitman> do I need to install mdadm?
[12:16] <mitman> the raid was automagically setup when I installed intreped server
[12:17] <mitman> i have 4 HDDs and configured 2 as the OS Raid and 2 as the DATA Raid
[12:17] <cemc> and you removed which one ?
[12:18] <mitman> i removed one from the OS and one from the DATA
[12:18] <cemc> imho you should still have the raid, but it should be degraded, you don't have /proc/mdstat file ?
[12:19] <mitman> no
[12:19] <cemc> and what did you change after removing those two hdds ?
[12:19] <mitman> well, my /dev/sdb6 was not mounting (my backup partition) and the backups were being saved in the root partition.. so now I am fsck'ing /dev/sdb6
[12:20] <cemc> sdb6 ? if you have raid, you should have md0, md1, and so on
[12:20] <mitman> i basically had /dev/sda and /dev/sdb mirrored in raid 1, then sdc and sdd mirrorerd. I took out the cable for sdb and sdc
[12:21] <mitman> cemc: mine didn't do that.. i have a whole bunch of /dev/mapper/uuid's
[12:22] <cemc> mitman: can you pastebin /etc/fstab and 'fdisk -l' output ?
[12:22] <mitman> hardware RAID is disabled on the mobo.. intrepid just asked me during install and i configured it that way
[12:22] <mitman> sure
[12:23] <mitman> http://paste.ubuntu.com/154629/
[12:25] <mitman> cemc: make sense?
[12:27] <cemc> not really :) if it's in raid, where is /proc/mdstat and where why is there no autoraid partition type
[12:27] <mitman> no clue, do you think intrepid does things differently?
[12:28] <mitman> either way, I now have a 2 hd system which I need to get working, once its up and running what should I do to get the other drives in raid with it?
[12:30] <mitman> orr do you think my system is somehow using the onboard hardware raid (i doubt it)
[12:30] <cemc> I'm not sure... because I don't see where the raid is right now... what I know about it, if you have 2 disks (or two partitions) in raid1, you should have /proc/mdstat. if you remove one, you should still have the other one in raid and mdstat showing degraded raid
[12:30] <cemc> not sure why you don't have that...
[12:31] <mitman> hmm no clue, any idea about how to proceed?
[12:39] <simplexio> mitman: usually you define hw raid just after bios has started, then you see only one device in linux
[12:45] <mitman> simplexio - its def not Hardware tho
[12:45] <mitman> what is this error, device or resource busy
[12:46] <mitman> when I am trying to mount a partition?
[12:48] <cemc> mitman: what are you trying to mount?
[12:49] <mitman> cemc: /dev/sdb6, it had some errors, i ran fsck.. ran for like 40 mins, rebooted and it won't mount
[12:49] <mitman> this is meant to be my backup partition.. maybe the partition is corrupted?
[12:49] <cemc> what does dmesg say at the end? try mounting the partition, then look at dmesg's output
[12:49] <cemc> and/or in /var/log/syslog
[12:50] <mitman> just says device or resource busy or already mounted
[12:50] <mitman> do you think best bet is to make2fs the partition then pray it mounts?
[12:51] <cemc> make2fs ? you don't have any data on it ?
[12:51] <VK7HSE> is the raid on your mainboard true hardware raid? or just glorified fake raid? as was previously mentioned, once hardware raid is implemented then yes to the OS it will just appear as one (or what ever you have configured the drive(s) to)
[12:51] <cemc> make2fs will format it
[12:51] <mitman> its fake raid.. but i disabled it
[12:51] <mitman> cemc: it has backup data
[12:52] <mitman> cemc: but i don't know how recover it.. its not THAT important, i still have the original files so i can begin backing up today
[12:52] <mitman> my server is going to recovery mode only because this mount is failing.  not only that, whenever bootup fails the server put / into Read only mode and I can't do anything
[12:53] <cemc> ok, then back to the original question: what did you do after removing the other disks? you say you made some changes
[12:55] <mitman> cemc: My server was failing to mount /dev/hdb6 (/dev/hdc6 - they were in raid) I *think* the data is corrupted.  So I took away hdc, and booted with only hdb.. still hdb6 is failing throwing me into recovery mode
[12:55] <mitman> i hit ctrl-d to boot normally, ran fsck on hdb6
[12:55] <mitman> that ran for a good 40 mins, i have rebooted now, and it still won't mount
[12:56] <mitman> so basically i want hda (my os) and hdb (my data drive) to work perfectly, then i'll figure out how to software raid them again
[12:56] <mitman> the other issues is, because hdb6 failed to mount, my cron job for backups backed up to my / partition.. so the root partition is full
[12:57] <mitman> i am trying to delete the files from / so i can run some commands, but the drive mounts as read only when the system boots incorrectly
[12:57] <mitman> so yeah, i am in a pickle :-(
[12:58] <cemc> you should be able to remount the root partition rw
[12:58] <cemc> after it boots in read-only
[12:58] <cemc> with: mount / -o remount,rw
[12:58] <mitman> cool
[12:58] <mitman> will do that, now what about hdb6
[12:58] <cemc> when you ran fsck, did it try to repair something?
[12:59] <dr4g> question, the partition manager is asking me for my Mount Point - i chose '/' but there were other options such as '/boot'. I want this primary partition to be the root file system and the bootable drive, should i go with this ?
[12:59] <cemc> did is say that anything was wrong?
[12:59] <mitman> cemc: yes a ton of things.. i just did it with the -y command
[12:59] <mitman> cemc: i just kept seeing lines being scrolled up hehe
[12:59] <cemc> dr4g: should be ok, yes, that is where ubuntu will be installed then
[13:00] <cemc> dr4g: you can create a separat smaller partition for /boot separately
[13:00] <cemc> mitman: what happens if you run another fsck on it? does it say it's clean?
[13:01] <mitman> doesn't have errors, but says has come contingity thing.. like 0.4%
[13:01] <mitman> i cant ssh into the box now because its still in recovery mode
[13:01] <mitman> so need to walk into the server room
[13:02] <cemc> mitman: so basically it says it's clean? how are you exactly trying to mount it? exact command
[13:02] <mitman> says clean
[13:03] <mitman> well /etc/fstab tries to mount it using
[13:03] <mitman> UUID=f491161c-2028-4ef9-be9d-ddd9aed30f69 /ldapbackup     ext3    relatime        0       2
[13:04] <mitman> hold up.. say in the root partition there's a directory which exists
[13:04] <mitman> and you try to mount on that
[13:04] <mitman> will there be an issue?
[13:04] <mitman> for example mount /dev/sdb6 /mnt/drive1
[13:04] <mitman> but /mnt/drive1 already exists with data in it...
[13:05] <cemc> maybe you should create another clean dir, like /mnt/hdd2
[13:05] <cemc> just to be sure. normally it shouldn't mind I think
[13:05] <runes> question: I created public_html folders for users, but when apache tries to publish to certain folders it fails as I have chmod 755 and the user and groups are set to that users name under public_html
[13:05] <mitman> let me try.. i need to delete that directory.. thats the backup stuff in it
[13:05] <mitman> brb
[13:07] <runes> do you have to have the group for the files and folders the same as the group that the web server is running as
[13:09] <runes> maybe I didn't phrase the question correctly?
[13:18] <mitman> oyy reboot takes forever
[13:30] <shadeslayer> hi,does ubuntu-server edition only have CLI?
[13:31] <soren> By default, yes.
[13:31] <dr4g> you can install GUI after installing ubuntu server
[13:31] <dr4g> if you wish
[13:31] <shadeslayer> soren: so we can install gnome and such above it? and what about the tools? i made a ad hoc network and want to use my laptop as server
[13:31] <soren> You can install a desktop environment on it, but there's no point.
[13:31] <shadeslayer> why?
[13:32] <soren> shadeslayer: Why would you? It's a server.
[13:32] <shadeslayer> soren: so arent servers meant to run gui?
[13:32] <soren> shadeslayer: If you want a desktop, you should use the desktop install.
[13:32] <ikonia> shadeslayer: why do you want the server version, it is not aimed at home hardware
[13:32] <soren> shadeslayer: Nope. They just stand around serving things. You shouldn't be looking at it anyway.
[13:33] <shadeslayer> ok,i just wanted to set up a ashoc network,ill use the home edition then
[13:33] <shadeslayer> *adhoc
[13:33] <shadeslayer> thanks
[13:44] <mitman> what is dmraid?
[14:04] <ZipmaO> Hi, I'm having a problem with vsftp
[14:05] <ZipmaO> I can successfully log on to the server if there's no files in the ftp folder
[14:05] <ZipmaO> i can also upload some files without problem
[14:06] <ZipmaO> but when i connect later on
[14:06] <ZipmaO> my client stops at "MDTM [filename]"
[14:06] <ZipmaO> and then times out
[14:06] <ZipmaO> Soneone got a clue?
[14:10] <sommer> ZipmaO: you might check for errors in /var/log/syslog
[14:10] <ZipmaO> will do..
[14:10] <ZipmaO> one more thin: it works perfectly from the server itself
[14:10] <ZipmaO> command line ftp
[14:13] <ZipmaO> nothing in the syslog
[14:14] <ZipmaO> only "logon OK" on /var/log/vsftpd.log
[14:14] <_ruben> sounds firewall'ish
[14:19] <ZipmaO> You're right _ruben
[14:19] <ZipmaO> tried from another computer localy
[14:20] <ZipmaO> I have forwarded port 21 correctly, the server shouln't need port 20 too?
[14:20] <ZipmaO> Data port 20 is enabled in the config..
[14:37] <_ruben> depends on the usage of active versus passive ftp, among other things
[14:37] <_ruben> load the ftp connection tracking kernel modules might help
[14:42] <ZipmaO> well I guess I want to use passive ftp
[14:42] <ZipmaO> guess it may be a problem with the hostname
[14:50] <ZipmaO> solved it with pasv_address in vsftpd.conf
[15:34] <tadeu_> guys, which free control panel you recommend to install in a ubuntu box ?
[15:34] <_ruben> !ebox
[15:35] <tadeu_> thanks
[15:36] <tadeu_> well, it seems to have some bugs..
[15:40] <ScottK> What doesn't?
[15:47] <soren> tadeu_: The only packages you'll find that doesn't have bugs reported against them are the ones noone uses.
[15:48] <tadeu_> soren, yes, how would you feel installing a production server with a software with tones of bugs ?
[15:49] <tadeu_> soren, i don't want something perfect.. but at least stable
[15:50] <soren> tadeu_: I'm not kidding. Every single piece of software in Ubuntu has bugs.
[15:51] <soren> tadeu_: Just like every single piece of software in Fedora, RHEL, Windows, Plan 9..
[15:51] <soren> Anything
[15:51] <yann2> tadeu_ > regarding your previous remark, come on, everybody using ubuntu does that :D *run*
[16:39] <kblessinggr> can't get apt-get to install mysql-server
[16:40] <kblessinggr> tried to follow these instructions, http://www.monkeedev.co.uk/blog/2009/03/23/installing-mysql-51-on-debian-and-ubuntu-using-apt/ but mysqld wouldn't start, so I removed the source and tried to put back on 5.0 but it won't let me
[16:47] <kblessinggr> pft
[17:29] <fargiolas> is it possible to convert an ubuntu-desktop installation into an ubuntu-server one?
[17:29] <fargiolas> (I need to set up an atom based home server but there is no lpia image for ubuntu-server..)
[17:30] <WoLf_Loonie> Hello everyone. looking for a general hint, as I can't decide which mail server to run.. anyone could give me some directions on which one would be the best choice? local mail and remote pop3/smtp.
[17:32] <WoLf_Loonie> I've been messing in the past with dovecot and postfix .. but a friend swears for Exim4 ..
[17:32] <WoLf_Loonie> basically, now I'm confused on which setup would be actually better.
[17:38] <JordiGH> I've got some Perl CGI that should be calling JSON functions, but it's erroring out saying that it can't find the JSON functions. Do I not have the right packages installed? I've got libjson-any-perl and libjson-perl.
[17:38] <JordiGH> The running server, supposedly with identical code, is working fine.
[17:39] <JordiGH> It's the dev server that's erroring out.
[17:39] <JordiGH> (could be worse... could be the other way around...)
[18:00] <zoredache> is the database format for bdb the same on 64 and 32 bit architectures?  I am trying to determine if I can copy squidguard blacklist databases from one system to another
[18:05] <JordiGH> Does Ubuntu have historical repositories? Trying to upgrade a server from feisty.
[18:10] <albertico> JordiGH, check http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/
[18:10] <JordiGH> albertico: Thanks.
[18:11] <albertico> JordiGH, no prob
[18:11] <JordiGH> Oh, wait, looks like I'm cool. gutsy is still in the repos.
[18:12] <JordiGH> I'll have to as far as hardy, though, because gutsy is about to die too.
[18:22] <JordiGH> Hm, the do-release-upgrade script is failing because it can't find the feisty-backports/ files...
[19:14] <AfrOTRokHE> all
[19:23] <foxbuntu_mobile> Hi all. Got a simple one, how do I configure an ubuntu-server to connect to the web through a proxy?
[19:24] <AfrOTRokHE> mmmmmmmmmmmm... ubuntu server has X env?
[19:24] <genii> foxbuntu_mobile: Usually set in /etc/environment I think
[19:25] <ScottK> AfrOTRokHE: No.
[19:25] <AfrOTRokHE> ScottK: hehe, thnks!
[19:25] <genii> foxbuntu_mobile: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=923451 has some examples
[19:26] <foxbuntu_mobile> genii, perfect thanks
[19:26] <genii> foxbuntu_mobile: Yer welcome
[20:07] <Assimilate> Is there a package yet for installing mysql 5.1 in ubuntu-server 8.10?
[20:08] <ScottK> Assimilate: No, but there is for 9.04 that's being released on Thursday.
[20:08] <Assimilate> ScottK, Is the release for server and desktop? Sorry new to how Ubuntu releases.
[20:08] <ScottK> Yes.  Both.
[20:09] <Assimilate> Thanks ScottK
[20:09] <ScottK> No problem.
[20:13] <Assimilate> Is there an upgrade tool like update-manager for the server edition? Most of the documentation online for upgradeing to 9.04 is for desktop.
[20:13] <ScottK> Yes.
[20:13] <ScottK> You need to make sure you have udpate-manager-common (I think that's the name) and the command is do-release-upgrade.
[20:13] <ScottK> Add -d to upgrade to a development release.
[20:13] <Assimilate> Thanks again
[20:14] <cemc> Assimilate: update-manager-core
[20:17] <ScottK> That's it.
[22:43] <JordiGH> dpkg wants to overwrite my conf file, and I don't know if I should let it or not: http://rafb.net/p/kfJtFr43.html
[22:55] <MianoSM> anyone here use webmin?
[22:56] <MianoSM> I can't seem to figure out why it keeps trying to redirect to an internal IP instead of the actual domain when attempts are made to connect to it via http instead of https...
[23:03] <MianoSM> nvm