jcole | ripps: its probably building open office | 00:06 |
---|---|---|
* jcole ducks | 00:06 | |
ripps | jcole: actually, it looks like a bunch of xulrunner and gcc | 00:07 |
thewrath | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/364387\ | 01:30 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 364387 in launchpad "image abotu summary of all bugs not displaying in IE" [Undecided,New] | 01:30 |
jamesh | thewrath: that feature uses the <canvas> element which is not supported by Internet Explorer, and IE compatible equivalent is available. | 02:30 |
thewrath | ok | 02:30 |
thewrath | was not aware of that | 02:31 |
jamesh | it is being drawn on the client side | 02:31 |
thewrath | ah | 02:31 |
thewrath | any way taht could be changed? | 02:31 |
wgrant | IE moving into this century. | 02:33 |
jamesh | thewrath: given that the graph isn't required for use of Launchpad, and the proportion of visitors using IE is not too high, I don't know when we'll get round to addressing it. | 02:34 |
jamesh | That said, the source code will be released in a few months, so if someone else is interested in fixing it they can submit a patch. | 02:35 |
cody-somerville | and given how useless the graph generally is... | 02:35 |
cody-somerville | : P | 02:35 |
wgrant | It should be useless. | 02:36 |
wgrant | It should be black with a tiny sliver of other colours. | 02:36 |
cody-somerville | I prefer my bugs fixed, not triaged :P | 02:37 |
wgrant | Closed bugs don't show up. | 02:37 |
jamesh | fix committed bugs do. | 02:37 |
wgrant | True. | 02:37 |
renpytom | Hello. | 04:32 |
renpytom | Does anyone know if there's a way to close all bugs associated with a milestone. (Flag them as fix released?) | 04:32 |
rockstar | renpytom, I use a script to do it. | 04:34 |
renpytom | is the script available anywhere? | 04:34 |
rockstar | renpytom, I'll paste it for you. I'm currently working on making it part of a release script. | 04:35 |
rockstar | renpytom, http://rafb.net/p/mFhupU90.html | 04:39 |
renpytom | Thanks. | 04:40 |
rockstar | renpytom, just change PROJECT and MILESTONE to be the project and milestone you want to close. | 04:40 |
renpytom | rockstar, thanks. | 04:46 |
renpytom | it worked well, and saved me a lot of boring work. | 04:46 |
rockstar | renpytom, yeah, that's why I wrote it. I closed ~300 bugs with it about two weeks ago. | 04:50 |
renpytom | well, thanks again. | 04:55 |
savvas | wow, estimated time 12 hours :P https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental/+build/955579 https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental/+build/955580 | 05:33 |
wgrant | I guess somebody took back three quarters of the builders for release. | 05:37 |
wgrant | It looks like i386 could do with one of the lpia builders reassigned. | 05:38 |
wgrant | And maybe even bring one of the others back. | 05:38 |
wgrant | But that should do it. | 05:38 |
savvas | oh yeah! I forgot about that heh. I think I'll cancel it though, the lpia build failed: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25802962/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 05:38 |
wgrant | You can't cancel it. | 05:39 |
savvas | so if I delete the sources, the queue will still go? | 05:39 |
wgrant | Good question. | 05:40 |
wgrant | It might end up as 'Build for superseded Source', but I'm not sure if that's only for Superseded rather than Deleted. | 05:40 |
savvas | I tried that before, I didn't get any errors from launchpad in that case about a missing source :) | 05:40 |
wgrant | It's possible it would fail to upload. | 05:41 |
wgrant | But I don't remember. | 05:41 |
savvas | ok thanks! | 05:41 |
savvas | I'll let it flow, it's not super-time sensitive, I'm testing a fix for bug 349572 | 05:42 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 349572 in packagekit-gnome "packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/349572 | 05:42 |
joey | wgrant, Happy Birthday :-) | 05:46 |
wgrant | joey: Thanks! | 05:47 |
wgrant | Am I to blame Facebook for this? | 05:47 |
savvas | happy birthday!! | 05:47 |
spm | mneptok: interesting post ref sun/mysql! we do live in "Interesting Times!" :-) | 05:48 |
joey | wgrant, :-) | 05:48 |
spm | wgrant: happy birthday!! | 05:48 |
wgrant | spm, savvas: Thanks. | 05:48 |
wgrant | I suppose I'm going to be un-Australian by not getting my license today. | 05:49 |
spm | wgrant: depends. L or P? if L? yes and you will be cast out of Australia into Tasmania. If P, shrug. care factor. :-D | 05:51 |
wgrant | spm: Well, I should probably have got my Ls at some point in the last two years... but I am yet to. | 05:52 |
* wgrant heads for Bass Strait. | 05:52 | |
jamesh | if you do get cast into Tasmania, you'll get access to the NBN early | 05:54 |
wgrant | jamesh: Good point, good point. | 05:54 |
wgrant | Which means we can exceed obscenely small download quotas in even fewer minutes. | 05:55 |
jamesh | or realise that 100Mbps to the home doesn't increase the capacity of the underwater cables | 05:55 |
jamesh | or magically reduce the latency | 05:56 |
wgrant | The capacity is being fixed. | 05:56 |
wgrant | Latency... blah. | 05:56 |
jamesh | I've used 512kbps connections in the US that felt faster than 1.5Mbps links over here | 05:57 |
lifeless | writing high latency network code is hard | 05:57 |
lifeless | and web browsers only soso insulate you - as you know jamesh :) | 05:58 |
mwhudson | lifeless: "writing high latency network code is hard" could be misinterpreted :) | 05:58 |
spm | jamesh: all we need are warp gates for the fibre pairs. exceed the speed of light, latency problem goes away. easy! I have faith in our federal government to produce these and other miracles on demand. | 05:58 |
lifeless | mwhudson: anything can be | 05:58 |
mwhudson | spm: is the speed of light thing really relevant? | 05:59 |
wgrant | mwhudson: Yes, it gets relevant at that sort of distance. | 05:59 |
mwhudson | light can get quite a lot further than london and back in .3s | 05:59 |
jamesh | spm: I think tunnels through the centre of the earth might be the answer. The shortest distance between two points is a straight line, after all | 05:59 |
wgrant | Sure, it doesn't account for *all* of it. | 05:59 |
mwhudson | oh, hm, not all that much more | 06:00 |
jamesh | none of this great circle nonsense | 06:00 |
mwhudson | jamesh: :) | 06:00 |
spm | mwhudson: highly relevant! http://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html | 06:00 |
lifeless | mwhudson: the earth is big | 06:01 |
mwhudson | spm: wow | 06:03 |
wgrant | spm: Nice, nice. | 06:03 |
spm | mwhudson: and you thought sysadmin was only restarting busted web services... :-P | 06:04 |
mwhudson | spm: nah | 06:04 |
mwhudson | spm: i'm sure installing packages comes into it somewhere too | 06:04 |
* spm waits to finish lol'ing before trying to respond to that.... | 06:05 | |
jamesh | spm: why didn't the sysadmin use a packaged version of the MTA? | 06:08 |
jamesh | that way the OS upgrade shouldn't have nuked it | 06:08 |
Peng_ | You know those buggy stacked branches? Could that happen when LP automatically stacks a mirrored branch? | 06:08 |
spm | jamesh: solaris/sunos patchsets always clobber sendmail-isms. .. or were till at least Sol8. used to clobber my postfix setup on firewalls. very ARGHish. | 06:09 |
wgrant | That's Solaris for you. | 06:09 |
jamesh | spm: sounds like a good reason not to use Solaris | 06:09 |
spm | jamesh: and sendmail 5 vs sendmail8 or postfix? yuk. just *yuk. | 06:09 |
spm | if memory serves. sendmail was part of the core OS. rightly or not (ie not). one of those horrible backward compatibile nonsense rules. Made sense, but was also a real trap. | 06:11 |
savvas | are the launchpad PPA build logs deleted after some time? | 06:18 |
wgrant | savvas: Only retried builds, IIRC. | 06:18 |
savvas | bug 249104 - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16047515/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-sparc.packagekit-gnome_0.2.3-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz says 404 error :\ | 06:19 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 249104 in packagekit-gnome "FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/249104 | 06:19 |
wgrant | savvas: Chances are the build was retried. | 06:20 |
wgrant | And that obliterates the old log. | 06:20 |
wgrant | (well, not directly, but it removes the reference to it, so the file gets GCed eventually) | 06:21 |
savvas | ok thanks :) | 06:21 |
wgrant | spm: It really looks like you need an extra i386 virt builder. | 06:21 |
HammerHead66 | how is everyone today? | 06:41 |
toobaz3 | Hello. https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/pyclutter/+bug/267478 should track a remote bug, but it didn't notice the remote bug was fixed, and if I go in changing details, I see "Launchpad couldn't import bug #494242 from Debian Bug tracker." However, the Debian bug page is absolutely OK... should I file a bug about launchpad? | 06:50 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 267478 in pyclutter "Please remove pyclutter from Intrepid archive" [High,Fix released] | 06:50 |
ubottu | Error: Launchpad bug 494242 could not be found | 06:50 |
MTecknology | hurray, 2am and I finally got my assignment done. :) | 07:51 |
mneptok | spm: :) | 07:51 |
MTecknology | 20+hr worth of work :) | 07:51 |
MTecknology | and this is the wrong channel | 07:51 |
noodles775 | Congrats anyway MTecknology :) | 07:51 |
MTecknology | thanks | 07:52 |
MTecknology | wish I could sleep w/ all this noise - I hate dorms | 07:53 |
=== mkorn is now known as thekoern_ | ||
=== thekoern_ is now known as thekorn_ | ||
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
* mpt reads https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/363584/comments/2 | 10:18 | |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 363584 in ubuntu "Belgian Electronic ID card is broken beidgui2.6.0-4" [Undecided,New] | 10:18 |
mpt | The frustrating mystery of bug 88818 continues | 10:19 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 88818 in malone "Many people report non-Launchpad bugs on Launchpad products" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88818 | 10:19 |
noodles775 | lol... wonder if there's an easy way to check... "Are you really sure this is a launchpad bug??" without being annoying... | 10:20 |
* noodles775 reads the bug | 10:21 | |
maxb | It could check whether you're a member of the ~yes-i-understand-what-launchpad-actually-is team :-) | 10:21 |
maxb | and refuse to let you file otherwise | 10:22 |
rowinggolfer | whoever is responsible for the howtos on becoming an ubutero.. very clear. thanks | 10:37 |
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 | ||
=== kkubasik_ is now known as kkubasik | ||
cumulus007 | Hi, are there plas to speed up launchpad? It's freaking slow to me | 14:46 |
beuno | cumulus007, yes | 14:46 |
cumulus007 | *plans. For example, it takes about 15 seconds to load a page with translations | 14:46 |
beuno | we're actively working to making it much faster | 14:46 |
beuno | cumulus007, which URL specifically? | 14:47 |
cumulus007 | okay, great :) Can you tell me when this will be applied? | 14:47 |
beuno | cumulus007, it's an on going task | 14:47 |
beuno | we do performance weeks once a month | 14:47 |
cumulus007 | https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+lang/nl/+index?start=0&batch=75 | 14:47 |
cumulus007 | okay | 14:47 |
beuno | danilo_, ^ | 14:47 |
cumulus007 | I hev been here before, with the same issue | 14:48 |
cumulus007 | *have. | 14:48 |
danilo_ | cumulus007: if we promised to support batch sizes of 75, we would have made it the default :) unfortunately, if you can use a hacked batch size, you need to use the default of 10 | 14:51 |
danilo_ | s/can use/can't use/ | 14:51 |
danilo_ | cumulus007: why do you need to see so many messages? | 14:51 |
cumulus007 | danilo_: since it's really hard to find a translation package in launchpad. The most important packages are listed first, so with a high batch number I can see all important packages at once | 14:52 |
danilo_ | cumulus007: ah, sorry, misread the link | 14:53 |
kiko | danilo: DRL | 14:53 |
danilo_ | cumulus007: that one is being worked on, it should be fixed soon | 14:53 |
danilo_ | kiko: right | 14:53 |
cumulus007 | danilo_: okay, that would be great, and would spare a lot of time to me :) | 14:54 |
danilo_ | cumulus007: I am sorry you are seeing this, we are going to fix it asap | 14:55 |
cumulus007 | danilo_: np :) | 14:56 |
MagicFab | Hi all | 15:33 |
MagicFab | I can't seem to file bugs from here: | 15:33 |
MagicFab | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug | 15:33 |
MagicFab | I always get Timeout error when I press continue, it's been the case for a few *days* now, no matter where I am | 15:34 |
kiko | MagicFab, OOPSID? | 15:34 |
MagicFab | Last one was (Error ID: OOPS-1207EB187) | 15:34 |
ripps | For some reason, I'm having trouble building a gmpc package for lpia. I finishes building, but I get an uploading error. I've never gotten this before. https://edge.launchpad.net/~gmpc-trunk/+archive/ppa/+build/955999 | 15:35 |
* MagicFab suspects the description field is where th eproblem originates | 15:35 | |
cprov | ripps: the binaries are already there, ignore the error. | 15:36 |
MagicFab | kiko, my original description for the bug was: | 15:36 |
MagicFab | Small USB mouse [09da:0006] is not recgnized, "can't set config #1, error -32" error, works with PS/2 adapter | 15:36 |
MagicFab | Making it shorter works | 15:36 |
noodles775 | ripps, cprov: the upload log says: | 15:37 |
noodles775 | 2009-04-21 14:31:23 ERROR Exception while accepting: | 15:37 |
noodles775 | duplicate key value violates unique constraint "binarypackagerelease_binarypackagename_key" | 15:37 |
noodles775 | -> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25826463/ngSDHt6QPwkjwZYXs45yw1Q8BS4.txt (duplicate key value violates unique constraint "binarypackagerelease_binarypackagename_key" | 15:37 |
noodles775 | ) | 15:37 |
ripps | noodles775: What exactly does that mean? | 15:37 |
cprov | ripps: your build got dispatched twice due to a problem in our system. | 15:38 |
noodles775 | Ah, thanks cprov (I wanted to know too!) | 15:38 |
kiko | MagicFab, let me show this to BjornT | 15:59 |
=== sabdfl2 is now known as sabdfl | ||
MagicFab | kiko, sure thing, I've file the bug otherwise, but that subject was giving "timeout" - I guess the message should have also been "too long" or "invalid characters" etc | 16:12 |
MagicFab | tx | 16:12 |
kiko | MagicFab, it's weird, there's something wrong there | 16:16 |
kiko | MagicFab, always timing out on that | 16:16 |
=== EdwinGrubbs changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: EdwinGrubbs | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | karma count change: http://blog.launchpad.net/general/karma-where-did-mine-go | ||
poolie | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jspashett/bzr/bug_84659_allow_writes/revision/3942 seems to be failing... (jml) | 17:38 |
jml | poolie: EdwinGrubbs's the help contact :) | 17:40 |
poolie | it's ok now | 17:44 |
jml | poolie: perhaps more helpfully, the code browsing service is known to be unreliable. | 17:46 |
jml | poolie: and we're working very hard to make it better | 17:46 |
jcole | hi guys | 18:08 |
jcole | how do i go about getting my password removed from an apport bug report stacktrace | 18:08 |
KIAaze | hi, I just got the following rejection message from my PPA: The source netgen - 4.9.7-0ubuntu1 is already accepted in ubuntu/intrepid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution. You have to modify the source version and re-upload. | 18:16 |
KIAaze | however the version in the repositories is 4.4 | 18:16 |
bigjools | you're trying to upload to Ubuntu, not your PPA | 18:16 |
KIAaze | no, I put my PPA in the dput command | 18:17 |
bigjools | ah sorry I misread | 18:17 |
bigjools | end-of-day-tired-eyes | 18:17 |
cprov | KIAaze: what's your PPA url ? | 18:17 |
cprov | KIAaze: did that version ever existed in your PPA ? | 18:17 |
KIAaze | https://launchpad.net/~zohn-joidberg/+archive/engrid | 18:17 |
KIAaze | yes | 18:18 |
KIAaze | but I deleted it. | 18:18 |
bigjools | you can't upload the same version again, even if you delete it | 18:18 |
KIAaze | :( | 18:18 |
bigjools | it's to prevent problems with apt clients | 18:18 |
bigjools | if it sees the same version again with different checksums, it will fail | 18:19 |
Edgar1 | I'm kind of new in this, can someone explain me what the PPA is all about? | 18:19 |
KIAaze | it's a personal repository | 18:20 |
KIAaze | you can build your own .debs on it and make them available for others | 18:20 |
KIAaze | Do I have to change the version number everywhere or only in debian/changelog? | 18:22 |
KIAaze | I'd like to keep the 4.9.7 since it's the version of the .tar.gz | 18:22 |
EdwinGrubbs | KIAaze: I believe you can just change the -0ubuntu1 part of the version and leave the 4.9.7 part the same. | 18:24 |
KIAaze | thx | 18:24 |
KIAaze | I used dch which automaticcally created an entry with 0ubuntu2 | 18:24 |
KIAaze | testing with pbuilder now | 18:25 |
maxb | KIAaze: In general you should never upload things to PPAs with version numbers which look like they could be used in Ubuntu itself, because that gets confusing | 18:33 |
maxb | You could call it 4.9.7-0ubuntu1ppa1 for example | 18:33 |
KIAaze | well, what's the best way to make the ubuntu/debian maintainers upgrade their version? :) | 18:34 |
maxb | Produce an updated package yourself, and submit it for sponsored upload to ubuntu. http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess | 18:36 |
KIAaze | ok, so I almost finished the first part. :) | 18:41 |
KIAaze | Isn't it better to submit updated packages to Debian first? | 18:43 |
maxb | ideally, yes | 18:44 |
KIAaze | hey, why did my PPA only build for i386? :( | 18:58 |
KIAaze | is Architecture: All different from Architecture: Any? | 18:59 |
cody-somerville | Yes | 19:01 |
cody-somerville | KIAaze, does your package *need* to be built on all the different architectures? | 19:01 |
KIAaze | I think so | 19:01 |
KIAaze | not sure | 19:01 |
KIAaze | it's C++ | 19:02 |
cody-somerville | KIAaze, Yea, I'd say so. :) | 19:02 |
KIAaze | actually it didn't build any .debs | 19:03 |
KIAaze | it just says bvuilds: i386 but ther's no .deb to download | 19:04 |
KIAaze | oops, no, just a missing page refresh | 19:04 |
LarstiQ | KIAaze: All is for architecture independent packages, they will be built only once. | 19:12 |
KIAaze | ok, thx | 19:12 |
KIAaze | I put that in because before it didn't build for lpia and that was the solution I found somewhere on the net. | 19:13 |
KIAaze | the original package had a list of archs | 19:13 |
LarstiQ | KIAaze: that might be valid, not all packages can actually be built for all archs | 19:14 |
vadi2 | hi. it seems its impossible to open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218515 - it redirects to https://bugs.launchpad.net/acton/+bug/218515 which is wrong | 19:42 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] | 19:42 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] | 19:42 |
vadi2 | well, worked for the bot for some reason. | 19:43 |
EdwinGrubbs | vadi2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218515 will always redirect you to the url which specifies the project name that the bug belongs to. Are you not able to view the bug after you are redirected? | 19:47 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] | 19:47 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] | 19:47 |
vadi2 | no | 19:48 |
KIAaze | now I can't see the package on my PPA in synaptic. :( | 19:48 |
vadi2 | I get to https://bugs.launchpad.net/acton/+bug/218515 | 19:48 |
LarstiQ | KIAaze: is it published yet? | 19:48 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] | 19:48 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] | 19:48 |
vadi2 | which is a "lost something"? page | 19:48 |
KIAaze | yes | 19:49 |
KIAaze | https://launchpad.net/~zohn-joidberg/+archive/engrid | 19:49 |
KIAaze | Could it have something to do with it having a version nb ending in 0ubuntu3 instead of 0ubuntu1? | 19:49 |
vadi2 | EdwinGrubbs: http://www.ubuntu-pics.de/bild/12805/screenshot_39_eDhxCJ.png | 19:49 |
KIAaze | I even deactivated all official repositories, to leave only the PPA | 19:49 |
LarstiQ | KIAaze: try `apt-cache policy <package-name>` | 19:49 |
cprov | KIAaze: which source are you missing ? | 19:49 |
KIAaze | netgen | 19:50 |
KIAaze | I can see togl in synaptic without problems | 19:50 |
cprov | KIAaze: https://edge.launchpad.net/~zohn-joidberg/+archive/engrid/+build/956186 | 19:51 |
cprov | KIAaze: says it was *built* 7 minutes ago | 19:51 |
cprov | KIAaze: it missed the publishing run on :40 and will be published in the next one (:00) | 19:51 |
KIAaze | ah ok :) | 19:51 |
EdwinGrubbs | vadi2:It appears that you cannot see that bug anymore because it is marked as a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/matchbox-keyboard/+bug/205871 | 20:04 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] | 20:04 |
EdwinGrubbs | vadi2: I'm trying to determine if this is an error or if it is intended that only admins can see the duplicate bug. | 20:04 |
vadi2 | are you sure | 20:05 |
vadi2 | I'm interested in the gtk+ bug | 20:05 |
vadi2 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218515 | 20:05 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] | 20:05 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] | 20:05 |
vadi2 | see, it gives two... I'd like the first one | 20:05 |
vadi2 | not the ppa issue. It looks like something is confused here. | 20:06 |
vadi2 | Ahh my apoligies. | 20:06 |
vadi2 | didn't see that it said duplicate. didn't realize someone would mark it as such too :) | 20:06 |
EdwinGrubbs | vadi2: I figured it out. You couldn't view that bug since the acton project has been deactivated. | 20:26 |
vadi2 | Ahh. | 20:28 |
vadi2 | Guess that makes sense, but I guess LP should say that, yeah? | 20:28 |
cgregan | joey: ping | 21:24 |
thewrath | how do you proposa to merge towo branches together? | 21:34 |
rockstar | thewrath, cd $first_branch; bzr merge $second_branch | 21:38 |
thewrath | so like bzr merge lp:~michaelbrown2009/mikesats/mikesats1 | 21:38 |
thewrath | $ bzr send -o mycode.patch what about that command | 21:41 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: if you have write rights to the branch you want to merge into, then do what rockstar said | 21:41 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: launchpad has some ui to propose doing it, is that what you meant? | 21:41 |
thewrath | ui? | 21:41 |
thewrath | I have two branches. I want to move branch2 into branch1 | 21:41 |
rockstar | thewrath, what are the two branches you need merged, and which one is the focus? | 21:41 |
rockstar | thewrath, do you have branch1 and branch2 on your machine? | 21:42 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: then just do it :) | 21:42 |
thewrath | branch 2 not branch1 | 21:42 |
thewrath | should i go and download branch1? | 21:42 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: yes | 21:42 |
thewrath | ok | 21:42 |
thewrath | then to merge branch 2 with branch 1 do what | 21:43 |
thewrath | cd into branch 2 and then bzr mergebranch 1 | 21:43 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: Presuming branch2 is the branc you want to merge _into_, yes | 21:44 |
LarstiQ | otherwise, change the cd and the merge commands | 21:44 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: after the merge, review it (bzr status, bzr diff, conflicts, whatever gives you enough confidence the merge is done right) and the commit it | 21:45 |
thewrath | okay | 21:45 |
thewrath | i have mikesats and mikesats1 | 21:45 |
thewrath | i want to merge everything into mikesats | 21:45 |
rockstar | thewrath, cd mikesats; bzr merge mikesats1; bzr commit -m "Merge from mikesats1" | 21:46 |
* LarstiQ nods | 21:46 | |
thewrath | I get nothing to do | 21:47 |
rockstar | thewrath, that will merge mikesats1 into mikesats with a commit message of "Merge from mikesats1" | 21:47 |
rockstar | thewrath, that means that you don't need to merge the two branches. | 21:47 |
thewrath | why i know there is a file missing in mikesats | 21:47 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: does `bzr missing` think mikesats1 has no extra revisions? | 21:47 |
thewrath | when i run bzr merge mikesats1 all i get is nothing to do | 21:48 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: bzr merge ../mikesats1? | 21:49 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: unfortunately merge doesn't give the clearest message if you point it at a non-existing branch | 21:50 |
thewrath | ok | 21:50 |
thewrath | hold on i think i have it figured out | 21:50 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: so make sure you give merge the path to your mikesats1 branch | 21:50 |
thewrath | Branches have no common ancester, and no merge base revision was specififed | 21:52 |
thewrath | when i do bzr merge ../launchpad | 21:52 |
thewrath | i haev all my stuff in C:\xampp\htdocs\Launchpad Branches | 21:52 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: ah, you seperately `bzr init`ed the two branches? | 21:52 |
thewrath | the two in that directory is mikesats (first directory) and Launchpad (second branch) | 21:52 |
thewrath | yes i did | 21:52 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: right, that would give you this then | 21:53 |
thewrath | i want to move everything in launchpad to mikesats | 21:53 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: are their contents vastly different, or do they represent similar content? | 21:53 |
thewrath | same except one fiel | 21:54 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: do you want to keep the history of the mikesats1 branch? | 21:54 |
thewrath | no | 21:54 |
LarstiQ | ok | 21:54 |
* LarstiQ tries something out | 21:54 | |
* thewrath thanks LarstiQ a head of time | 21:59 | |
magcius | Would it be considered a bug that when you create a branch in Launchpad it doesn't make a .bzr directory? | 22:00 |
thewrath | no | 22:00 |
LarstiQ | magcius: create it how? | 22:00 |
thewrath | i dont th ink so bc that happens to me all the time i have brought it up and just been told to use the --use-ext-directory or what ever it is | 22:01 |
thewrath | LarstiQ: create it right on Launchpad | 22:01 |
magcius | It seems kind of awkward to use --use-existing-directory | 22:01 |
magcius | LarstiQ, use the Register a Branch feature. | 22:01 |
* LarstiQ creates branches by pushing them | 22:01 | |
magcius | LarstiQ, you can do that? | 22:01 |
LarstiQ | magcius: yes, that is much more natural to me than registering a branch on the web | 22:01 |
magcius | LarstiQ, if I knew you could do that I would have done it. | 22:02 |
magcius | So bzr push ~username/+junk/mybranchname? | 22:02 |
magcius | err | 22:02 |
magcius | bzr push lp:~username/+junk/mybranchname? | 22:02 |
thewrath | soudnds right | 22:02 |
LarstiQ | magcius: lp:~username/project/branch, yes | 22:02 |
LarstiQ | magcius: there is also the `bzr register-branch` command | 22:02 |
thewrath | LarstiQ: let me know when you think you got something betw | 22:03 |
thewrath | *btw | 22:03 |
LarstiQ | magcius: but that's more for remote branches I think | 22:03 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: I will | 22:03 |
thewrath | thanks! | 22:03 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: it's not really usual in bzr to have branches without a common ancestor representing the same branch, so I need to experiment a bit | 22:06 |
thewrath | ok | 22:06 |
thewrath | yea i understand | 22:06 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: hmm, I might not get something sensible before my bedtime | 22:14 |
thewrath | ok | 22:15 |
thewrath | lol | 22:15 |
thewrath | i can just remove the one | 22:15 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: if you remember to `bzr branch` instead of `bzr init`, this would be easier ;) | 22:16 |
LarstiQ | alternatively, I could just forget about coming up with a recipe and do the merge for you | 22:16 |
LarstiQ | with handwork of unix tools and vim | 22:16 |
thewrath | whaaaaaaaaaaaaat? | 22:17 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: I'm guessing it will take me less time to apply a hammer and do everything by hand, then come up with something you could repeat | 22:18 |
thewrath | ok | 22:18 |
thewrath | how do i remove a branch? | 22:18 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: from your local disk, just remove the directory | 22:18 |
thewrath | i mean on launchpad | 22:18 |
* LarstiQ would say `rm -rf` but you're on windows | 22:18 | |
LarstiQ | thewrath: there is a delete branch button I think | 22:19 |
savvas | rmdir -q if I remember well :) | 22:19 |
savvas | anyway, good night :) | 22:19 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: do you see such a button on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~michaelbrown2009/mikesats/mikesats1 ? | 22:19 |
thewrath | no i dont | 22:21 |
thewrath | i got it | 22:23 |
LarstiQ | thewrath: ok, good night then | 22:25 |
thewrath | have fun | 22:25 |
* LarstiQ falls asleep | 22:25 | |
thewrath | a question for a person who is still here what does a blue plus sign mean on a file instead of a green circle with a checkmark | 22:26 |
thewrath | found out | 22:27 |
KIAaze | hi again, I keep getting warnings like this when running "debuild -S -sa": dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file debian/togl.default.ex | 22:49 |
KIAaze | how do I get rid of them? | 22:49 |
KIAaze | and especially rid of the files i deleted | 22:50 |
Ampelbein | hi! is there a problem with updating remote bugwatches that use mantis? see bug 316590 - lp complains the issue was non-existent but it's there. | 23:07 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 316590 in mpd "mpd does not support album artist" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/316590 | 23:07 |
KIAaze | do built packages only appear on the web page after :00 or :40? | 23:20 |
wgrant | KIAaze: :00, :20 and :40. | 23:25 |
KIAaze | ok, thx | 23:25 |
KIAaze | so it's not only the synaptic repository for which I have to wait | 23:25 |
wgrant | KIAaze: It's a bit inconsistent - sources will appear on Launchpad every 5 minutes, when the FTP server is checked. They will only appear in your repository every 20 minutes. Binaries only appear on the web page every 20 minutes, but I believe there's working ongoing to make that more obvious. | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!