[00:06] ripps: its probably building open office [00:06] * jcole ducks [00:07] jcole: actually, it looks like a bunch of xulrunner and gcc [01:30] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/364387\ [01:30] Launchpad bug 364387 in launchpad "image abotu summary of all bugs not displaying in IE" [Undecided,New] [02:30] thewrath: that feature uses the element which is not supported by Internet Explorer, and IE compatible equivalent is available. [02:30] ok [02:31] was not aware of that [02:31] it is being drawn on the client side [02:31] ah [02:31] any way taht could be changed? [02:33] IE moving into this century. [02:34] thewrath: given that the graph isn't required for use of Launchpad, and the proportion of visitors using IE is not too high, I don't know when we'll get round to addressing it. [02:35] That said, the source code will be released in a few months, so if someone else is interested in fixing it they can submit a patch. [02:35] and given how useless the graph generally is... [02:35] : P [02:36] It should be useless. [02:36] It should be black with a tiny sliver of other colours. [02:37] I prefer my bugs fixed, not triaged :P [02:37] Closed bugs don't show up. [02:37] fix committed bugs do. [02:37] True. [04:32] Hello. [04:32] Does anyone know if there's a way to close all bugs associated with a milestone. (Flag them as fix released?) [04:34] renpytom, I use a script to do it. [04:34] is the script available anywhere? [04:35] renpytom, I'll paste it for you. I'm currently working on making it part of a release script. [04:39] renpytom, http://rafb.net/p/mFhupU90.html [04:40] Thanks. [04:40] renpytom, just change PROJECT and MILESTONE to be the project and milestone you want to close. [04:46] rockstar, thanks. [04:46] it worked well, and saved me a lot of boring work. [04:50] renpytom, yeah, that's why I wrote it. I closed ~300 bugs with it about two weeks ago. [04:55] well, thanks again. [05:33] wow, estimated time 12 hours :P https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental/+build/955579 https://edge.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental/+build/955580 [05:37] I guess somebody took back three quarters of the builders for release. [05:38] It looks like i386 could do with one of the lpia builders reassigned. [05:38] And maybe even bring one of the others back. [05:38] But that should do it. [05:38] oh yeah! I forgot about that heh. I think I'll cancel it though, the lpia build failed: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25802962/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [05:39] You can't cancel it. [05:39] so if I delete the sources, the queue will still go? [05:40] Good question. [05:40] It might end up as 'Build for superseded Source', but I'm not sure if that's only for Superseded rather than Deleted. [05:40] I tried that before, I didn't get any errors from launchpad in that case about a missing source :) [05:41] It's possible it would fail to upload. [05:41] But I don't remember. [05:41] ok thanks! [05:42] I'll let it flow, it's not super-time sensitive, I'm testing a fix for bug 349572 [05:42] Launchpad bug 349572 in packagekit-gnome "packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/349572 [05:46] wgrant, Happy Birthday :-) [05:47] joey: Thanks! [05:47] Am I to blame Facebook for this? [05:47] happy birthday!! [05:48] mneptok: interesting post ref sun/mysql! we do live in "Interesting Times!" :-) [05:48] wgrant, :-) [05:48] wgrant: happy birthday!! [05:48] spm, savvas: Thanks. [05:49] I suppose I'm going to be un-Australian by not getting my license today. [05:51] wgrant: depends. L or P? if L? yes and you will be cast out of Australia into Tasmania. If P, shrug. care factor. :-D [05:52] spm: Well, I should probably have got my Ls at some point in the last two years... but I am yet to. [05:52] * wgrant heads for Bass Strait. [05:54] if you do get cast into Tasmania, you'll get access to the NBN early [05:54] jamesh: Good point, good point. [05:55] Which means we can exceed obscenely small download quotas in even fewer minutes. [05:55] or realise that 100Mbps to the home doesn't increase the capacity of the underwater cables [05:56] or magically reduce the latency [05:56] The capacity is being fixed. [05:56] Latency... blah. [05:57] I've used 512kbps connections in the US that felt faster than 1.5Mbps links over here [05:57] writing high latency network code is hard [05:58] and web browsers only soso insulate you - as you know jamesh :) [05:58] lifeless: "writing high latency network code is hard" could be misinterpreted :) [05:58] jamesh: all we need are warp gates for the fibre pairs. exceed the speed of light, latency problem goes away. easy! I have faith in our federal government to produce these and other miracles on demand. [05:58] mwhudson: anything can be [05:59] spm: is the speed of light thing really relevant? [05:59] mwhudson: Yes, it gets relevant at that sort of distance. [05:59] light can get quite a lot further than london and back in .3s [05:59] spm: I think tunnels through the centre of the earth might be the answer. The shortest distance between two points is a straight line, after all [05:59] Sure, it doesn't account for *all* of it. [06:00] oh, hm, not all that much more [06:00] none of this great circle nonsense [06:00] jamesh: :) [06:00] mwhudson: highly relevant! http://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html [06:01] mwhudson: the earth is big [06:03] spm: wow [06:03] spm: Nice, nice. [06:04] mwhudson: and you thought sysadmin was only restarting busted web services... :-P [06:04] spm: nah [06:04] spm: i'm sure installing packages comes into it somewhere too [06:05] * spm waits to finish lol'ing before trying to respond to that.... [06:08] spm: why didn't the sysadmin use a packaged version of the MTA? [06:08] that way the OS upgrade shouldn't have nuked it [06:08] You know those buggy stacked branches? Could that happen when LP automatically stacks a mirrored branch? [06:09] jamesh: solaris/sunos patchsets always clobber sendmail-isms. .. or were till at least Sol8. used to clobber my postfix setup on firewalls. very ARGHish. [06:09] That's Solaris for you. [06:09] spm: sounds like a good reason not to use Solaris [06:09] jamesh: and sendmail 5 vs sendmail8 or postfix? yuk. just *yuk. [06:11] if memory serves. sendmail was part of the core OS. rightly or not (ie not). one of those horrible backward compatibile nonsense rules. Made sense, but was also a real trap. [06:18] are the launchpad PPA build logs deleted after some time? [06:18] savvas: Only retried builds, IIRC. [06:19] bug 249104 - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16047515/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-sparc.packagekit-gnome_0.2.3-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz says 404 error :\ [06:19] Launchpad bug 249104 in packagekit-gnome "FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/249104 [06:20] savvas: Chances are the build was retried. [06:20] And that obliterates the old log. [06:21] (well, not directly, but it removes the reference to it, so the file gets GCed eventually) [06:21] ok thanks :) [06:21] spm: It really looks like you need an extra i386 virt builder. [06:41] how is everyone today? [06:50] Hello. https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/pyclutter/+bug/267478 should track a remote bug, but it didn't notice the remote bug was fixed, and if I go in changing details, I see "Launchpad couldn't import bug #494242 from Debian Bug tracker." However, the Debian bug page is absolutely OK... should I file a bug about launchpad? [06:50] Launchpad bug 267478 in pyclutter "Please remove pyclutter from Intrepid archive" [High,Fix released] [06:50] Error: Launchpad bug 494242 could not be found [07:51] hurray, 2am and I finally got my assignment done. :) [07:51] spm: :) [07:51] 20+hr worth of work :) [07:51] and this is the wrong channel [07:51] Congrats anyway MTecknology :) [07:52] thanks [07:53] wish I could sleep w/ all this noise - I hate dorms === mkorn is now known as thekoern_ === thekoern_ is now known as thekorn_ === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [10:18] * mpt reads https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/363584/comments/2 [10:18] Launchpad bug 363584 in ubuntu "Belgian Electronic ID card is broken beidgui2.6.0-4" [Undecided,New] [10:19] The frustrating mystery of bug 88818 continues [10:19] Launchpad bug 88818 in malone "Many people report non-Launchpad bugs on Launchpad products" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88818 [10:20] lol... wonder if there's an easy way to check... "Are you really sure this is a launchpad bug??" without being annoying... [10:21] * noodles775 reads the bug [10:21] It could check whether you're a member of the ~yes-i-understand-what-launchpad-actually-is team :-) [10:22] and refuse to let you file otherwise [10:37] whoever is responsible for the howtos on becoming an ubutero.. very clear. thanks === Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 === kkubasik_ is now known as kkubasik [14:46] Hi, are there plas to speed up launchpad? It's freaking slow to me [14:46] cumulus007, yes [14:46] *plans. For example, it takes about 15 seconds to load a page with translations [14:46] we're actively working to making it much faster [14:47] cumulus007, which URL specifically? [14:47] okay, great :) Can you tell me when this will be applied? [14:47] cumulus007, it's an on going task [14:47] we do performance weeks once a month [14:47] https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+lang/nl/+index?start=0&batch=75 [14:47] okay [14:47] danilo_, ^ [14:48] I hev been here before, with the same issue [14:48] *have. [14:51] cumulus007: if we promised to support batch sizes of 75, we would have made it the default :) unfortunately, if you can use a hacked batch size, you need to use the default of 10 [14:51] s/can use/can't use/ [14:51] cumulus007: why do you need to see so many messages? [14:52] danilo_: since it's really hard to find a translation package in launchpad. The most important packages are listed first, so with a high batch number I can see all important packages at once [14:53] cumulus007: ah, sorry, misread the link [14:53] danilo: DRL [14:53] cumulus007: that one is being worked on, it should be fixed soon [14:53] kiko: right [14:54] danilo_: okay, that would be great, and would spare a lot of time to me :) [14:55] cumulus007: I am sorry you are seeing this, we are going to fix it asap [14:56] danilo_: np :) [15:33] Hi all [15:33] I can't seem to file bugs from here: [15:33] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug [15:34] I always get Timeout error when I press continue, it's been the case for a few *days* now, no matter where I am [15:34] MagicFab, OOPSID? [15:34] Last one was (Error ID: OOPS-1207EB187) [15:35] For some reason, I'm having trouble building a gmpc package for lpia. I finishes building, but I get an uploading error. I've never gotten this before. https://edge.launchpad.net/~gmpc-trunk/+archive/ppa/+build/955999 [15:35] * MagicFab suspects the description field is where th eproblem originates [15:36] ripps: the binaries are already there, ignore the error. [15:36] kiko, my original description for the bug was: [15:36] Small USB mouse [09da:0006] is not recgnized, "can't set config #1, error -32" error, works with PS/2 adapter [15:36] Making it shorter works [15:37] ripps, cprov: the upload log says: [15:37] 2009-04-21 14:31:23 ERROR Exception while accepting: [15:37] duplicate key value violates unique constraint "binarypackagerelease_binarypackagename_key" [15:37] -> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25826463/ngSDHt6QPwkjwZYXs45yw1Q8BS4.txt (duplicate key value violates unique constraint "binarypackagerelease_binarypackagename_key" [15:37] ) [15:37] noodles775: What exactly does that mean? [15:38] ripps: your build got dispatched twice due to a problem in our system. [15:38] Ah, thanks cprov (I wanted to know too!) [15:59] MagicFab, let me show this to BjornT === sabdfl2 is now known as sabdfl [16:12] kiko, sure thing, I've file the bug otherwise, but that subject was giving "timeout" - I guess the message should have also been "too long" or "invalid characters" etc [16:12] tx [16:16] MagicFab, it's weird, there's something wrong there [16:16] MagicFab, always timing out on that === EdwinGrubbs changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: EdwinGrubbs | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | karma count change: http://blog.launchpad.net/general/karma-where-did-mine-go [17:38] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jspashett/bzr/bug_84659_allow_writes/revision/3942 seems to be failing... (jml) [17:40] poolie: EdwinGrubbs's the help contact :) [17:44] it's ok now [17:46] poolie: perhaps more helpfully, the code browsing service is known to be unreliable. [17:46] poolie: and we're working very hard to make it better [18:08] hi guys [18:08] how do i go about getting my password removed from an apport bug report stacktrace [18:16] hi, I just got the following rejection message from my PPA: The source netgen - 4.9.7-0ubuntu1 is already accepted in ubuntu/intrepid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution. You have to modify the source version and re-upload. [18:16] however the version in the repositories is 4.4 [18:16] you're trying to upload to Ubuntu, not your PPA [18:17] no, I put my PPA in the dput command [18:17] ah sorry I misread [18:17] end-of-day-tired-eyes [18:17] KIAaze: what's your PPA url ? [18:17] KIAaze: did that version ever existed in your PPA ? [18:17] https://launchpad.net/~zohn-joidberg/+archive/engrid [18:18] yes [18:18] but I deleted it. [18:18] you can't upload the same version again, even if you delete it [18:18] :( [18:18] it's to prevent problems with apt clients [18:19] if it sees the same version again with different checksums, it will fail [18:19] I'm kind of new in this, can someone explain me what the PPA is all about? [18:20] it's a personal repository [18:20] you can build your own .debs on it and make them available for others [18:22] Do I have to change the version number everywhere or only in debian/changelog? [18:22] I'd like to keep the 4.9.7 since it's the version of the .tar.gz [18:24] KIAaze: I believe you can just change the -0ubuntu1 part of the version and leave the 4.9.7 part the same. [18:24] thx [18:24] I used dch which automaticcally created an entry with 0ubuntu2 [18:25] testing with pbuilder now [18:33] KIAaze: In general you should never upload things to PPAs with version numbers which look like they could be used in Ubuntu itself, because that gets confusing [18:33] You could call it 4.9.7-0ubuntu1ppa1 for example [18:34] well, what's the best way to make the ubuntu/debian maintainers upgrade their version? :) [18:36] Produce an updated package yourself, and submit it for sponsored upload to ubuntu. http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess [18:41] ok, so I almost finished the first part. :) [18:43] Isn't it better to submit updated packages to Debian first? [18:44] ideally, yes [18:58] hey, why did my PPA only build for i386? :( [18:59] is Architecture: All different from Architecture: Any? [19:01] Yes [19:01] KIAaze, does your package *need* to be built on all the different architectures? [19:01] I think so [19:01] not sure [19:02] it's C++ [19:02] KIAaze, Yea, I'd say so. :) [19:03] actually it didn't build any .debs [19:04] it just says bvuilds: i386 but ther's no .deb to download [19:04] oops, no, just a missing page refresh [19:12] KIAaze: All is for architecture independent packages, they will be built only once. [19:12] ok, thx [19:13] I put that in because before it didn't build for lpia and that was the solution I found somewhere on the net. [19:13] the original package had a list of archs [19:14] KIAaze: that might be valid, not all packages can actually be built for all archs [19:42] hi. it seems its impossible to open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218515 - it redirects to https://bugs.launchpad.net/acton/+bug/218515 which is wrong [19:42] Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] [19:42] Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] [19:43] well, worked for the bot for some reason. [19:47] vadi2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218515 will always redirect you to the url which specifies the project name that the bug belongs to. Are you not able to view the bug after you are redirected? [19:47] Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] [19:47] Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] [19:48] no [19:48] now I can't see the package on my PPA in synaptic. :( [19:48] I get to https://bugs.launchpad.net/acton/+bug/218515 [19:48] KIAaze: is it published yet? [19:48] Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] [19:48] Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] [19:48] which is a "lost something"? page [19:49] yes [19:49] https://launchpad.net/~zohn-joidberg/+archive/engrid [19:49] Could it have something to do with it having a version nb ending in 0ubuntu3 instead of 0ubuntu1? [19:49] EdwinGrubbs: http://www.ubuntu-pics.de/bild/12805/screenshot_39_eDhxCJ.png [19:49] I even deactivated all official repositories, to leave only the PPA [19:49] KIAaze: try `apt-cache policy ` [19:49] KIAaze: which source are you missing ? [19:50] netgen [19:50] I can see togl in synaptic without problems [19:51] KIAaze: https://edge.launchpad.net/~zohn-joidberg/+archive/engrid/+build/956186 [19:51] KIAaze: says it was *built* 7 minutes ago [19:51] KIAaze: it missed the publishing run on :40 and will be published in the next one (:00) [19:51] ah ok :) [20:04] vadi2:It appears that you cannot see that bug anymore because it is marked as a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/matchbox-keyboard/+bug/205871 [20:04] Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] [20:04] vadi2: I'm trying to determine if this is an error or if it is intended that only admins can see the duplicate bug. [20:05] are you sure [20:05] I'm interested in the gtk+ bug [20:05] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218515 [20:05] Ubuntu bug 218515 in acton "GTK app segfault with TextView widget (dup-of: 205871)" [High,Confirmed] [20:05] Ubuntu bug 205871 in acton "[Hardy+PPA]:Intergrated mousepad but cannot launch it from console, shows "segment fault" error" [High,Fix released] [20:05] see, it gives two... I'd like the first one [20:06] not the ppa issue. It looks like something is confused here. [20:06] Ahh my apoligies. [20:06] didn't see that it said duplicate. didn't realize someone would mark it as such too :) [20:26] vadi2: I figured it out. You couldn't view that bug since the acton project has been deactivated. [20:28] Ahh. [20:28] Guess that makes sense, but I guess LP should say that, yeah? [21:24] joey: ping [21:34] how do you proposa to merge towo branches together? [21:38] thewrath, cd $first_branch; bzr merge $second_branch [21:38] so like bzr merge lp:~michaelbrown2009/mikesats/mikesats1 [21:41] $ bzr send -o mycode.patch what about that command [21:41] thewrath: if you have write rights to the branch you want to merge into, then do what rockstar said [21:41] thewrath: launchpad has some ui to propose doing it, is that what you meant? [21:41] ui? [21:41] I have two branches. I want to move branch2 into branch1 [21:41] thewrath, what are the two branches you need merged, and which one is the focus? [21:42] thewrath, do you have branch1 and branch2 on your machine? [21:42] thewrath: then just do it :) [21:42] branch 2 not branch1 [21:42] should i go and download branch1? [21:42] thewrath: yes [21:42] ok [21:43] then to merge branch 2 with branch 1 do what [21:43] cd into branch 2 and then bzr mergebranch 1 [21:44] thewrath: Presuming branch2 is the branc you want to merge _into_, yes [21:44] otherwise, change the cd and the merge commands [21:45] thewrath: after the merge, review it (bzr status, bzr diff, conflicts, whatever gives you enough confidence the merge is done right) and the commit it [21:45] okay [21:45] i have mikesats and mikesats1 [21:45] i want to merge everything into mikesats [21:46] thewrath, cd mikesats; bzr merge mikesats1; bzr commit -m "Merge from mikesats1" [21:46] * LarstiQ nods [21:47] I get nothing to do [21:47] thewrath, that will merge mikesats1 into mikesats with a commit message of "Merge from mikesats1" [21:47] thewrath, that means that you don't need to merge the two branches. [21:47] why i know there is a file missing in mikesats [21:47] thewrath: does `bzr missing` think mikesats1 has no extra revisions? [21:48] when i run bzr merge mikesats1 all i get is nothing to do [21:49] thewrath: bzr merge ../mikesats1? [21:50] thewrath: unfortunately merge doesn't give the clearest message if you point it at a non-existing branch [21:50] ok [21:50] hold on i think i have it figured out [21:50] thewrath: so make sure you give merge the path to your mikesats1 branch [21:52] Branches have no common ancester, and no merge base revision was specififed [21:52] when i do bzr merge ../launchpad [21:52] i haev all my stuff in C:\xampp\htdocs\Launchpad Branches [21:52] thewrath: ah, you seperately `bzr init`ed the two branches? [21:52] the two in that directory is mikesats (first directory) and Launchpad (second branch) [21:52] yes i did [21:53] thewrath: right, that would give you this then [21:53] i want to move everything in launchpad to mikesats [21:53] thewrath: are their contents vastly different, or do they represent similar content? [21:54] same except one fiel [21:54] thewrath: do you want to keep the history of the mikesats1 branch? [21:54] no [21:54] ok [21:54] * LarstiQ tries something out [21:59] * thewrath thanks LarstiQ a head of time [22:00] Would it be considered a bug that when you create a branch in Launchpad it doesn't make a .bzr directory? [22:00] no [22:00] magcius: create it how? [22:01] i dont th ink so bc that happens to me all the time i have brought it up and just been told to use the --use-ext-directory or what ever it is [22:01] LarstiQ: create it right on Launchpad [22:01] It seems kind of awkward to use --use-existing-directory [22:01] LarstiQ, use the Register a Branch feature. [22:01] * LarstiQ creates branches by pushing them [22:01] LarstiQ, you can do that? [22:01] magcius: yes, that is much more natural to me than registering a branch on the web [22:02] LarstiQ, if I knew you could do that I would have done it. [22:02] So bzr push ~username/+junk/mybranchname? [22:02] err [22:02] bzr push lp:~username/+junk/mybranchname? [22:02] soudnds right [22:02] magcius: lp:~username/project/branch, yes [22:02] magcius: there is also the `bzr register-branch` command [22:03] LarstiQ: let me know when you think you got something betw [22:03] *btw [22:03] magcius: but that's more for remote branches I think [22:03] thewrath: I will [22:03] thanks! [22:06] thewrath: it's not really usual in bzr to have branches without a common ancestor representing the same branch, so I need to experiment a bit [22:06] ok [22:06] yea i understand [22:14] thewrath: hmm, I might not get something sensible before my bedtime [22:15] ok [22:15] lol [22:15] i can just remove the one [22:16] thewrath: if you remember to `bzr branch` instead of `bzr init`, this would be easier ;) [22:16] alternatively, I could just forget about coming up with a recipe and do the merge for you [22:16] with handwork of unix tools and vim [22:17] whaaaaaaaaaaaaat? [22:18] thewrath: I'm guessing it will take me less time to apply a hammer and do everything by hand, then come up with something you could repeat [22:18] ok [22:18] how do i remove a branch? [22:18] thewrath: from your local disk, just remove the directory [22:18] i mean on launchpad [22:18] * LarstiQ would say `rm -rf` but you're on windows [22:19] thewrath: there is a delete branch button I think [22:19] rmdir -q if I remember well :) [22:19] anyway, good night :) [22:19] thewrath: do you see such a button on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~michaelbrown2009/mikesats/mikesats1 ? [22:21] no i dont [22:23] i got it [22:25] thewrath: ok, good night then [22:25] have fun [22:25] * LarstiQ falls asleep [22:26] a question for a person who is still here what does a blue plus sign mean on a file instead of a green circle with a checkmark [22:27] found out [22:49] hi again, I keep getting warnings like this when running "debuild -S -sa": dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file debian/togl.default.ex [22:49] how do I get rid of them? [22:50] and especially rid of the files i deleted [23:07] hi! is there a problem with updating remote bugwatches that use mantis? see bug 316590 - lp complains the issue was non-existent but it's there. [23:07] Launchpad bug 316590 in mpd "mpd does not support album artist" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/316590 [23:20] do built packages only appear on the web page after :00 or :40? [23:25] KIAaze: :00, :20 and :40. [23:25] ok, thx [23:25] so it's not only the synaptic repository for which I have to wait [23:29] KIAaze: It's a bit inconsistent - sources will appear on Launchpad every 5 minutes, when the FTP server is checked. They will only appear in your repository every 20 minutes. Binaries only appear on the web page every 20 minutes, but I believe there's working ongoing to make that more obvious.