[01:27] <jcastro> asac: around?
[01:35] <asac> 2:35 AM
[01:35] <asac> jcastro: ;)
[01:35] <jcastro> I was just hoping heh
[01:35] <asac> "I am your dream" ;)
[01:35] <jcastro> do you remember what you did to that gears .xpi to make it work in prism?
[01:36] <jcastro> I did a reinstall and realized that gears isn't supported in amd64
[01:36] <asac> yes. adding toolkit@mozilla.org as targetApplication
[01:36] <asac> e.g. copy the first targetApplication block in install.rdf
[01:36] <jcastro> ah
[01:36] <jcastro> ok
[01:36] <asac> and use minVersion 1.9 and maxVersion 1.9.*
[01:36] <asac> or 1.9.0.*
[01:36] <jcastro> minVersion 1.9?
[01:36] <asac> yes
[01:36] <jcastro> my prism seems to be .9 something
[01:37] <jcastro> oh I see, that's the xulrunner version?
[01:37] <jcastro> ok and how do I edit the .xpi, just unzip it and rezip it?
[01:37] <asac> jcastro: yeah that (in theory) should enable gears on all xul-apps
[01:37] <asac> jcastro: yeah zipping out and in
[01:38] <asac> jcastro: you can also add prism as targetApplication explicitly. but i somehow still think it might work on all xulapps ;) (maybe a dream ;))
[01:38] <asac> and i dont know the prism id, so toolkit@mozilla.org is safe
[01:38] <jcastro> ok
[01:50] <jcastro> version doesn't seem to work
[01:59] <asac> jcastro: you probably did a typo
[01:59] <asac> somewhere ;)
[10:49] <asac> [reed]: awake?
[10:49] <[reed]> asac: sadly, yes
[10:49] <asac> [reed]: :) did anyone consider that 3.0.9 is now released like 18 hours before the jaunty final release ;)?
[10:50] <[reed]> yes, we're well-aware
[10:50] <asac> good
[10:50] <[reed]> it was supposed to be tomorrow
[10:50] <[reed]> and justdave and I said NO
[10:50] <[reed]> but two days should be enough split
[10:50] <asac> k. just noticed that you realigned releases because of fedora releases ;)
[10:50] <asac> lets hope.
[10:50] <[reed]> ubuntu never releases early on release date
[10:50] <[reed]> day
[10:51] <[reed]> so, I'm not worried
[10:51] <asac> [reed]: yeah. we usually release at 1700 UTC
[10:51] <asac> at least i think
[10:51] <asac> let me ask release masters
[10:54] <BUGabundo> 17h? that's a bit early eheh
[10:54] <BUGabundo> I've seen it come at 20h GMT
[10:55] <asac> 11:54 < slangasek> it's meant to happen during business hours in the UK
[10:55] <asac> [reed]: ^^
[10:55] <asac> so earlier than 1800UTC
[10:56] <[reed]> they've never been on time before
[10:56] <asac> but given that you probably won't will push back until after release, i guess we just have to see what happens (most likely nothing happens ... but i am not a mirror guy)
[10:56] <asac> yeah
[10:56] <asac> hehe
[10:56] <asac> i would think if you share mirrors that also ship CDs you will see bustage
[10:56] <[reed]> I do know that a lot of our mirrors are your mirrors, too
[10:57] <[reed]> and they can't handle both Firefox and Ubuntu at the same time
[10:57] <asac> [reed]: also CD mirrors?
[10:57] <[reed]> we're way bigger than Ubuntu, though
[10:57] <gnomefreak> LTS is supported for 3 years for desktop or is it 18 months?
[10:57] <[reed]> asac: some, I'm sure
[10:57] <asac> [reed]: bigger yes. but i guess the data asked from CD mirrors is really high ;)
[10:57] <[reed]> yeah, it saturates them pretty heavily
[10:58] <asac> but lets see. you guys thought about it, so its probably all right
[10:58] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: LTS is 3 why Desktop, 5 server
[10:58] <[reed]> yeah, we talked to mirror operators and release team about it
[10:58] <[reed]> two day gap should work out
[10:58] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: thanks
[10:59] <[reed]> and we can easily throw more bandwidth at us if needed
[10:59] <asac> [reed]: let me know how it went ;)
[10:59] <asac> i think its less than 18 hours ;)
[11:00] <[reed]> "its" ?
[11:00] <[reed]> you mean Firefox release?
[11:00] <[reed]> it's in 12 hours
[11:00] <[reed]> though, we'll start seeding the mirrors in a few hours
[11:00] <[reed]> when Toronto wakes up
[11:01] <asac> [reed]: spread between ffox rolls out and ubuntu release
[11:01] <asac> is less than 18 hours ;)
[11:01] <asac> er
[11:01] <asac> less than 36 i mean ;)
[11:01] <[reed]> yeah, about to say
[11:01] <[reed]> considering you're on Thursday
[11:01] <[reed]> and we're on Tuesday
[11:02] <[reed]> you may be delayed slightly, depending on how your mirrors are doing
[11:02] <[reed]> we'll see
[11:02] <BUGabundo> wait, what FF release will that be?
[11:03] <[reed]> 3.0.9
[11:03] <BUGabundo> ahh don't care then
[11:03] <BUGabundo> eheh
[11:03] <BUGabundo> I just use 3.6
[11:03] <[reed]> asac: you working on getting 3.0.9 ready to go?
[11:03] <BUGabundo> when will 3.5 it the AllBetas site?
[11:03] <[reed]> like, at least to intrepid, and then to jaunty as soon as archive reopens?
[11:03] <gnomefreak> asac: any reason we are skipping/skiped firefox 3.0.9?
[11:03] <[reed]> better not be skipping 3.0.9...
[11:03] <asac> [reed]: no. i stop doing security updates :-P
[11:03] <asac> security is overvalued ;)
[11:04] <asac> j.k
[11:04] <[reed]> lol
[11:04] <asac> gnomefreak: 3.0.9 isnt out yet, so we had no chance to skip it
[11:04] <BUGabundo> what IMPORTANT fixes does this bring?
[11:04] <asac> [reed]: we release 24 hours after archive opens. i think jaunty-security is already open too
[11:04] <gnomefreak> I'm just going on your last comment in bug 187313
[11:04] <asac> so i we shift stuff there ven before we released
[11:04] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 187313 in firefox-3.0 "[MASTER] right click (with button release) might activate random popup-menu-item" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187313
[11:05] <asac> [reed]: err "we release 24 after mozilla releases"
[11:05] <asac> ;)
[11:05] <[reed]> that's fixed in 3.0.10
[11:05] <asac> yeah
[11:05] <gnomefreak> [reed]: i thought it was fixed already
[11:05] <asac> (sorry, i am still not really awake. did bug triaging till half past 4 am)
[11:05] <[reed]> gnomefreak: on 3.5+, yes
[11:05] <[reed]> not 3.0.x
[11:06] <gnomefreak> [reed]: ah that makes sense thanks
[11:44] <gnomefreak> asac: What is the right package to assign for lang packs?
[11:44] <asac> gnomefreak: depends. whats the problem?
[11:45] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 364459
[11:45] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 364459 in firefox-3.0 "No Latvian firefox in jaunty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/364459
[11:45] <asac> gnomefreak: assign to langpack-o-matic
[11:46] <asac> thats a product i think (not a package)
[11:46] <asac> invalidate the ubuntu task
[11:46] <gnomefreak> k
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[16:56] <asac> jcastro: ah. ok. you should rather unzip it in /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/extensions/{000a9d1c-beef-4f90-9363-039d445309b8}
[17:42] <asac> wow
[17:42] <asac> nsLocale.cpp: In static member function 'static PRUnichar* nsCharTraits<short unsigned int>::copy(PRUnichar*, const PRUnichar*, size_t)':
[17:42] <asac> nsLocale.cpp:7393545: error: expected type-specifier
[17:42] <asac> that means line 7.3 million something