| asac | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362352 | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 362352 in thunderbird "package thunderbird 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: files list file for package `xulrunner-1.9' contains empty filename" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 00:00 |
| asac | am i tired or is the problem hard to identify ;) | 00:00 |
| asac | i mean understanding his problem ;) | 00:00 |
| asac | directhex: the one in the test page is similar | 00:01 |
| directhex | asac, i know, but i DEFINITELY got the ubufox window with my version | 00:01 |
| asac | ah you do some data | 00:01 |
| directhex | i'll take a screenshot for posterity! | 00:01 |
| Lns | Hey all, a couple things I wanted to bring up | 00:11 |
| directhex | asac, http://www2.apebox.org/wordpress/picturebox-2/miscellanous-junk/?pid=220#picture_nav | 00:12 |
| Lns | In Jaunty w/Firefox 3.0.8, I was having major issues on Facebook when Adblock Plus was installed (even when completely deactivated). I couldn't do anything on FB - comment, see many pictures, etc... it wasn't until I completely removed Adblock that things actually started working again (even though, as I said, it was disabled) | 00:12 |
| Lns | Second thing, is there a way to remove the authentication from a closed tab so, say, someone can't come up to my browser instance and go history -> recently closed tabs, and re-open my, say, authenticated firewall config page? | 00:13 |
| asac | directhex: yeah. thats how its supposed to work | 00:23 |
| asac | Lns: have you tried a different adblock version? | 00:23 |
| Lns | asac: nope just tried the latest one from mozilla addons | 00:24 |
| directhex | asac, and DOES work! barring the whole "everyone on the internet uses plugin detection" issue | 00:24 |
| Lns | asac: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865 i believe (not on the same system but i'm sure this is it) | 00:24 |
| asac | Lns: removing authentication from the tab is difficult ... especially if its session cookies. i dont think there is such a feature. guess you should close app (remember tabs) and start it to get that effect | 00:25 |
| Lns | oh another thing I noticed (in jaunty) when i install the adobe flash plugin, it doesn't ask me to restart, and when i re-visit the flash page it prompts me to install the plugin again. | 00:25 |
| asac | Lns: its a bug that it prompts you again | 00:25 |
| asac | it used to work without restart | 00:25 |
| Lns | asac: rgr | 00:25 |
| asac | but something broke that | 00:25 |
| asac | i haven't tracked that down | 00:25 |
| asac | yet | 00:26 |
| Lns | no worries just thought i'd throw it out there =) | 00:26 |
| asac | its known ;) | 00:26 |
| asac | a bunch of bugs about that | 00:26 |
| Lns | cool...yeah the one that worried me the most was the closed tabs thing | 00:26 |
| asac | its kind of an interesting idea | 00:26 |
| Lns | i can see both sides of the issue..but i'd have to think that most people would assume when the tab is closed your session w/the site is also closed | 00:26 |
| Lns | just like if yo uclose the browser window itself | 00:27 |
| asac | maybe a feature that allows you to invalidate session cookies for current tab/page might exist in form of some extension | 00:27 |
| asac | Lns: i know, but its difficult.maybe user has more tabs open from same site and so on | 00:28 |
| Lns | asac: there's no way for FF to know that the tab being closed is the last one from the site open, and therefore closes the session cookie? | 00:28 |
| Lns | i know i'm probably greatly trivializing it | 00:28 |
| Lns | maybe a 'treat tabs as windows' option or something | 00:30 |
| Lns | although i'm not sure if it's the case if you have multiple windows vs tabs | 00:30 |
| asac | Lns: well. figuring out if its the last one is probably still doable. but the UI is not easy. | 00:31 |
| asac | you do not want to do that by default it think | 00:31 |
| asac | so either you make it upon request | 00:31 |
| asac | or you have a pref the user can change for all sites | 00:31 |
| asac | or you make that only for certain sites | 00:31 |
| asac | like bank/launchpad/mozilla | 00:32 |
| Lns | why not do it by default? I'd think that's the more secure way | 00:32 |
| asac | but also more annoying | 00:32 |
| asac | some sites dont need that much security ;) | 00:32 |
| Lns | really? I mean, I'm just talking for myself but when i close a tab i'm pretty much done with it | 00:33 |
| asac | but if you visit the site like 20 times a day and still close the page in between? | 00:33 |
| Lns | i would expect to have to log in again if i went back...it surprised me that it didn't | 00:33 |
| Lns | why not keep the tab open in those cases? :) | 00:33 |
| asac | if you do like 300 things in a day | 00:34 |
| asac | its easier to open what you need on demand | 00:34 |
| Lns | well that's a poweruser there | 00:34 |
| asac | than searching for the tab you already have opened ;) | 00:34 |
| Lns | that would, i think, mandate some manual config to relax the security | 00:34 |
| asac | depends how you define powerusers | 00:34 |
| asac | a lot of users use the webbrowser all day | 00:34 |
| Lns | as i do, with at least 3-7 tabs open at all times | 00:34 |
| asac | Lns: as i said its an interesting idea | 00:35 |
| Lns | just thought i'd throw it out there =) | 00:35 |
| Lns | thanks for listening ;) | 00:35 |
| asac | i would think that was already discussed though. but we will see | 00:36 |
| Lns | i'd think so too | 00:36 |
| asac | mozillla bug 307220 | 00:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 307220 in tkgate "Error when tkgate starts simulator " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307220 | 00:38 |
| asac | mozillla bug 272030 | 00:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 272030 in libass "please don't install ./usr/lib/libass.la" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272030 | 00:38 |
| asac | Lns: ^^ | 00:39 |
| asac | oops | 00:39 |
| asac | thats wrong ;) | 00:39 |
| Lns | hehe | 00:39 |
| asac | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117222 | 00:39 |
| asac | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210466 | 00:39 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 117222 in Networking: Cookies "Limit Scope of Session Cookies (new tabs and windows)" [Enhancement,Assigned] | 00:39 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 210466 in UI Design "Cookie Manager does not respond to Ctrl+W "close window"" [Trivial,New] | 00:39 |
| asac | last bug is differnet as it seems ;) | 00:40 |
| Lns | yeah those are a bit different, though related | 00:40 |
| Lns | so there's no way to force a second browser instance? | 00:41 |
| Lns | i guess that's why you get a "firefox is already running" ;) | 00:42 |
| Lns | which is kinda a pita when you close and rapidly re-open it | 00:42 |
| Lns | before it's done dying | 00:42 |
| asac | to some degree thats te reason for that already running thing | 00:43 |
| asac | the real reason is that it checks for X window to see if it needs to start a new process or send a command to an already running one | 00:44 |
| asac | so if you start them quickly both will not see that window | 00:44 |
| asac | and think: lets start a full new firefox | 00:44 |
| asac | then the firefox process loosing the race fails wit hthat alert | 00:44 |
| Lns | yeah | 00:46 |
| Lns | too bad there's no easy way to do File -> New -> Session Window | 00:46 |
| Lns | I guess that's more along the lines of that bug thou | 00:47 |
| Lns | Oh well, back to work =) | 00:49 |
| asac | i am off | 00:51 |
| BUGabundo | bye asac | 00:52 |
| Nafallo | asac: yes. we know. ;-) | 00:52 |
| BUGabundo | happy release party | 00:52 |
| Nafallo | asac: a little bit off, not to much that we will avoid you... :-) | 00:53 |
| BUGabundo | 2am... guess I'm hitting the pillow! good release party everyone | 02:03 |
| directhex | asac, does ubufox have any greasemonkeyish ability to tweak a single web page? | 08:49 |
| asac | directhex: no ;) ... thats what greasemonkey is for | 09:20 |
| directhex | asac, hm, i was wondering whether it'd work as a nice filthy hack for triggering the plugin finder | 09:22 |
| asac | directhex: hmm | 09:28 |
| asac | directhex: if you have an example greasescript that would detect that flash detection kit that would be indeed a great thing | 09:29 |
| directhex | asac, it doesn't need to be that complex really - every single "install silverlight" button on the internest ends up in the same place - http://go-mono.com/moonlight. so all you need to do is sniff the url | 09:30 |
| directhex | or i could smile sweetly at upstream to hax their page & detect jaunty | 09:30 |
| asac | directhex: you mean fixigin Silverlight.js ? | 09:31 |
| directhex | asac, well, i mean just a hack for that one page to insert a 1 pixel SL control if jaunty is detected, regardless of silverlight.js | 09:32 |
| asac | directhex: ah. ok. would be good, but finding such a grease script would be better ;) | 09:34 |
| directhex | asac, well, it's easy for silverlight - because Silverlight.js is pretty much the only detector in wide use, you just check to see if any of its methods are defined | 09:35 |
| asac | directhex: if you could come up with a prototype that adds a "<object " somewhere on the side (maybe invisible)? would probably workaround | 09:36 |
| gnomefreak | asac: what is RETR command in thunderbird? | 10:03 |
| asac | gnomefreak: that looks like an IMAP protocol command | 10:05 |
| gnomefreak | asac: i hope not since all the email addresses are pop | 10:05 |
| asac | yeah seems to be a protocol command (could be imap or pop) | 10:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: why do you ask? | 10:05 |
| gnomefreak | ah ok | 10:05 |
| gnomefreak | asac: i got the error a few times today as well as a few last week | 10:06 |
| BUGabundo | RETRieve | 10:06 |
| asac | gnomefreak: so you get a dialog popup? | 10:06 |
| BUGabundo | it issues the list of unpulled emails | 10:06 |
| asac | BUGabundo: is that pop or imap (or both) | 10:06 |
| gnomefreak | asac: yep | 10:06 |
| BUGabundo | both AFAIK | 10:07 |
| BUGabundo | most POPs | 10:07 |
| asac | heh. tha t explains why i got a bunch of hits for imap on google too | 10:07 |
| gnomefreak | says its a temorary problem | 10:07 |
| BUGabundo | imap(s) uses last | 10:07 |
| BUGabundo | *LAST | 10:07 |
| asac | thx | 10:10 |
| gnomefreak | asac: did you push 3.0.9 yet? | 10:10 |
| asac | gnomefreak: if you see it a gain show me a screenshot please | 10:11 |
| asac | (the RETR) | 10:11 |
| asac | gnomefreak: its pushed | 10:11 |
| asac | 8 hours ago i think | 10:11 |
| asac | to jaunty-security | 10:11 |
| gnomefreak | asac: ok will do. I'm getting a security announcment on 3.0.9 from the security mailing list | 10:11 |
| BUGabundo | security pocket already opened? | 10:12 |
| gnomefreak | from Jamie (not sure who it is but he is with Canonical | 10:12 |
| gnomefreak | ) | 10:12 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i just sent a dent about it | 10:15 |
| asac | gnomefreak: jamie is jdstrand | 10:15 |
| asac | (in this channel too) | 10:15 |
| BUGabundo | eheh | 10:15 |
| BUGabundo | u guys use and abuse all means of comunication | 10:15 |
| gnomefreak | ah ok i havent loaded gwibber yet, its too early to deal with errors | 10:15 |
| BUGabundo | email, im, irc, microblogs | 10:15 |
| asac | lol | 10:16 |
| gnomefreak | ok so most emails are in that small font while some are normal :( | 10:20 |
| BUGabundo | gnomefreak: usual advcice: make a new TB profile and try to reproduce | 10:23 |
| * gnomefreak hates when people ignore emails | 10:25 | |
| asac | gnomefreak: i guess mails with html vs. plain text | 10:25 |
| gnomefreak | BUGabundo: it doesnt happen all the time, so im fairly sure its not profile related | 10:25 |
| gnomefreak | asac: that could be it is this more of a Ubuntu issue or Mozilla? | 10:27 |
| asac | gnomefreak: most likely the user messed his font setup | 10:30 |
| asac | at least if the difference is so that its annoying | 10:30 |
| asac | (or its really just a few mails) | 10:30 |
| asac | users should only allow simple html | 10:30 |
| gnomefreak | asac: not a few but most are small some are normal | 10:30 |
| asac | gnomefreak: what is selected in View -> Mesage Body As ? | 10:31 |
| asac | use text or simple html | 10:31 |
| gnomefreak | nothing | 10:32 |
| gnomefreak | whould i need to restart Tbird? | 10:33 |
| gnomefreak | if not than plain text didnt work | 10:33 |
| gnomefreak | HTML doesnt help either | 10:34 |
| gnomefreak | how are we handling the applicants to extension team? | 10:39 |
| asac | gnomefreak: if we dont know them they get added to the cheering team | 10:41 |
| asac | what name was that again? | 10:42 |
| gnomefreak | https://edge.launchpad.net/~hanen105 | 10:42 |
| gnomefreak | he joined lots of teams | 10:42 |
| asac | gnomefreak: #ubuntu-release-party ;) ... you are not even there | 10:42 |
| asac | gnomefreak: we reject him telling that teams are something to contribute first | 10:42 |
| asac | gnomefreak: point him to the team we have set up | 10:43 |
| asac | how was that called again? | 10:43 |
| gnomefreak | mozilla squad | 10:43 |
| gnomefreak | ubuntu-mozillasquad to be exact | 10:43 |
| asac | gnomefreak: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozillasquad | 10:43 |
| asac | yeah | 10:43 |
| gnomefreak | he was already a member of the team still looking for more info on him | 10:44 |
| asac | well. we dont know him ;) | 10:45 |
| asac | reject him and tell him he should contribute here for a while first | 10:45 |
| gnomefreak | kk | 10:46 |
| asac | but given that he joined the daily team even | 10:46 |
| asac | i would think he hasnt done this to contribute ;) | 10:46 |
| gnomefreak | agreed | 10:48 |
| directhex | <script type="text/javascript">if(/Ubuntu\/(\d+.\d\d)/.exec(navigator.userAgent)[1]>=9.04)document.write("<object type=\"application/x-silverlight\" data=\"data:application/x-silverlight,\" width=\"0\" height=\"0\" />");</script> | 10:50 |
| directhex | my first javascript of 2009 | 10:50 |
| armin76 | asac: i'm i right thinking that libgtkembedmoz is not available on xul 1.9? | 10:52 |
| gnomefreak | asac: thanks for updating the mailing list admin <still too damn early> | 10:54 |
| asac | armin76: yes | 10:54 |
| armin76 | asac: thanks :) | 10:54 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i found out something good. i can reply to a mime part of the ml approval mail | 10:54 |
| asac | to reject his mail | 10:54 |
| asac | so i for rejection you dont even need to go to webinterface | 10:54 |
| gnomefreak | on sweet | 10:54 |
| gnomefreak | s/on/oh | 10:55 |
| asac | same for approvals ... but you have to include the password in the reply to the -request (take care that that doesnt go to list or user if you want to try ;)) | 10:55 |
| asac | gnomefreak: if you look at approval mails there should be two attachments | 10:55 |
| asac | one is a snipped similar to what you get when you confirm your account on subscription | 10:55 |
| asac | armin76: those folks need to use the glue | 10:56 |
| armin76 | asac: bumb :) | 10:56 |
| gnomefreak | ok i see attachments | 10:56 |
| asac | armin76: 99.99% of those asking that at least dont know | 10:56 |
| asac | gnomefreak: not sure if you can reply to an attachment in tbird. guess you would need to open it with double click first | 10:57 |
| asac | gnomefreak: can you open such an attachment as a mail by clicking on it in tbird? | 10:57 |
| gnomefreak | asac: yes | 10:57 |
| asac | gnomefreak: yeah. so you should see instructions in there | 10:58 |
| gnomefreak | i have it open | 10:58 |
| asac | i didnt really understand the approval ... but the reection is easy ;) ... just reply | 10:58 |
| gnomefreak | depends there are 2 attachments | 10:58 |
| asac | without changing anyhting | 10:58 |
| asac | gnomefreak: well. if you read the content you will see which is the right one | 10:58 |
| asac | its pretty obvious | 10:58 |
| asac | has a subject like "confirm ...." | 10:58 |
| gnomefreak | ah ha found the right attachment | 10:59 |
| asac | but i think thats a new feature. its definitly a new milestone in mailing list handling ;) | 10:59 |
| gnomefreak | so for spam i just send a empty email with header and subject intact? | 11:00 |
| === jtv1 is now known as jtv | ||
| asac | gnomefreak: yeah. | 11:02 |
| asac | gnomefreak: well you just hit reply | 11:02 |
| asac | dont need to remove anything from body | 11:02 |
| asac | just reply ... send | 11:02 |
| gnomefreak | reply>send | 11:02 |
| asac | yep | 11:02 |
| gnomefreak | thats too easy | 11:03 |
| asac | ;) | 11:03 |
| BUGabundo | eheh | 11:03 |
| asac | after having done a few you could start trying how the approval works | 11:03 |
| BUGabundo | and then we get his pass | 11:03 |
| asac | let me know if you find | 11:03 |
| asac | i would think that you probably have to write | 11:03 |
| asac | Approval: password | 11:03 |
| asac | in the first line of the body | 11:03 |
| asac | but the instructions are somewhat unclear | 11:03 |
| gnomefreak | well leave me a few so i can try it out ;) | 11:03 |
| asac | no worry | 11:03 |
| asac | i dont read mail today till evening | 11:03 |
| gnomefreak | that they are. but who runs it? | 11:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: what do you mean? | 11:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: oh. can you remove cruft from the mail admins page? | 11:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i guess bluekuja is still in there | 11:04 |
| gnomefreak | oh eait thats us nevermind, no sense in asking us to make it more clear | 11:04 |
| asac | he certainly shouldnt get those mails anymore | 11:04 |
| asac | lol | 11:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: ah i see. its mailman upstream freature i guess | 11:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: so mailman project ... or launchpad | 11:05 |
| gnomefreak | more info on this would be great | 11:05 |
| asac | they run those lists | 11:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: but maybe we can edit the text in the admin interface ;) | 11:05 |
| BUGabundo | there goes the mirror | 11:05 |
| BUGabundo | its out | 11:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i would suggest to check mailman documentation | 11:06 |
| asac | they probably explain that | 11:06 |
| gnomefreak | ok i can do that this week i hope | 11:06 |
| asac | gnomefreak: http://www.modwest.com/help/kb13-283.html | 11:07 |
| gnomefreak | oh this cant be good | 11:07 |
| asac | there is a bit more ... search for -request | 11:07 |
| asac | anyway ... you will figure | 11:07 |
| gnomefreak | ok they close the bug but say its not yet fixed in tbird b3pre | 11:08 |
| gnomefreak | oh i see tbird's xul is being changed to 1.9.2a1pre | 11:09 |
| gnomefreak | from 1.9.1 | 11:09 |
| gnomefreak | oh no thats 3.1 | 11:09 |
| gnomefreak | can we get that added to dailies | 11:09 |
| gnomefreak | that didnt give me anything, i keep looking after smoke =>email | 11:12 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i think we had a branch for 3.1 at some point | 11:13 |
| gnomefreak | Planning for transition from FF 3.0 to FF 3.5 doesnt make sense i think someone messed the subject up | 11:14 |
| asac | not sure if fta kept on maintaing that | 11:14 |
| gnomefreak | ok i can ping him later if im here | 11:14 |
| asac | gnomefreak: fta is away for a few weeks ;) | 11:14 |
| gnomefreak | ok i wont ping him later ;) | 11:14 |
| asac | he is doing kind of a long term trip ;) | 11:14 |
| gnomefreak | i can use one of those too | 11:16 |
| asac | ack++ | 11:16 |
| asac | i could just go and live in the dschungle for a while | 11:16 |
| asac | just next to a nice waterfall so i can cool myself down ;) | 11:17 |
| gnomefreak | :) | 11:17 |
| gnomefreak | be back smoke | 11:17 |
| * gnomefreak forgot to call babysitter | 11:40 | |
| gnomefreak | asac: take a look at but 105915 i dont see any auto filter | 11:40 |
| gnomefreak | opps | 11:40 |
| gnomefreak | bug 105915 | 11:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 105915 in linux-source-2.6.17 "cant find mixer after update" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105915 | 11:41 |
| gnomefreak | or not | 11:41 |
| gnomefreak | bug 105918 | 11:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 105918 in thunderbird "Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105918 | 11:41 |
| gnomefreak | there you go | 11:41 |
| asac | ooking | 11:54 |
| asac | gnomefreak: do you have filteres. isnt there a filter* file somewhere in profile | 11:55 |
| asac | ask user to attach that | 11:55 |
| gnomefreak | ok will do | 11:55 |
| asac | gnomefreak: its msgFilterRules.dat | 11:56 |
| asac | its somewhere in the profile | 11:56 |
| asac | i think in the directory of the account the filter was created for | 11:57 |
| gnomefreak | i dont see it in mine | 11:57 |
| gnomefreak | under default | 11:57 |
| gnomefreak | no wonder im llooking in firefox :( | 11:58 |
| asac | lol | 12:00 |
| gnomefreak | asac: filterlog.html or the messagefilters...dat | 12:00 |
| asac | gnomefreak: .mozilla-thunderbird | 12:00 |
| asac | is tbird 2 | 12:00 |
| gnomefreak | yep | 12:00 |
| asac | .thunderbird-3.0 is tbir 3 | 12:00 |
| gnomefreak | yeah i know | 12:00 |
| gnomefreak | msgFilterRules.dat | 12:00 |
| gnomefreak | yeap its the .dat | 12:01 |
| asac | gnomefreak: you have jaunty-security lines for sources.list at hand? | 12:02 |
| gnomefreak | yeah you sould too :) | 12:02 |
| asac | gnomefreak: can you plesae post your lines | 12:02 |
| gnomefreak | holy shit | 12:03 |
| gnomefreak | they are not in there | 12:03 |
| gnomefreak | thats a bad bug | 12:03 |
| gnomefreak | -proposed is added but security isnt? this is default list from a clean install | 12:04 |
| asac | gnomefreak: go to administration -> software sources and enable them ;) | 12:04 |
| gnomefreak | they should be in /etc/apt/sources.list upon install, hint these repos are important | 12:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: they are in there if you install ... i am pretty sure | 12:05 |
| asac | its just that i removed them manually i gues | 12:05 |
| asac | as i usualyl run development release | 12:05 |
| asac | and hence i dont ned them ;) | 12:05 |
| gnomefreak | not here during last install maybe 3 weeks ago | 12:05 |
| gnomefreak | maybe because its not final? | 12:07 |
| gnomefreak | but people that use pre release will now have to add them | 12:07 |
| asac | nah | 12:08 |
| asac | i think its been in there since beta at least | 12:08 |
| asac | i made a few test install after beta and it was in tere for sure | 12:08 |
| BUGabundo | gnomefreak: -proposed is not enabled by default | 12:09 |
| BUGabundo | and it needs a serious work!!! | 12:09 |
| BUGabundo | it should use apt-listchanges to let the user know what BUG its testing | 12:09 |
| gnomefreak | BUGabundo: i know but security repos are not in the sources.list | 12:09 |
| BUGabundo | really? | 12:10 |
| BUGabundo | clean install? | 12:10 |
| gnomefreak | http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644059 is from clean install around Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:47:46 -0400 | 12:11 |
| * gnomefreak doesnt see security in there | 12:11 | |
| asac | gnomefreak: | 12:16 |
| asac | deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-security universe main multiverse restricted | 12:16 |
| BUGabundo | thats strange | 12:16 |
| asac | deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-security universe main multiverse restricted | 12:16 |
| asac | deb http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/ubuntu/ jaunty-updates universe main multiverse restricted | 12:16 |
| asac | deb-src http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/ubuntu/ jaunty-updates universe main multiverse restricted | 12:16 |
| asac | i just added those | 12:16 |
| BUGabundo | let me ask on +1 | 12:16 |
| BUGabundo | gnomefreak: 2 ppl just checked and its there! | 12:18 |
| gnomefreak | thats a stock list | 12:18 |
| gnomefreak | i didnt touch that one | 12:18 |
| gnomefreak | BUGabundo: also upgrade will have them | 12:19 |
| gnomefreak | this is clean install | 12:19 |
| BUGabundo | fresh install | 12:19 |
| BUGabundo | thats what i asked | 12:19 |
| BUGabundo | really strange | 12:21 |
| BUGabundo | at lunch i'll try a kvm image | 12:21 |
| BUGabundo | i'm getting confirmations of FF3.0.9 getting installed! | 12:21 |
| BUGabundo | http://pastebin.com/m65f878e5 | 12:23 |
| gnomefreak | asac: bug 365357 have you seen this problem? I havent in a while | 12:28 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 365357 in xulrunner-1.9 "pkg did not install" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/365357 | 12:28 |
| gnomefreak | yuck i dont think it is xulrunner but ill ask a few | 12:30 |
| asac | gnomefreak: yes thats etcinsvk | 12:36 |
| gnomefreak | thought so | 12:36 |
| gnomefreak | i commented but i havent sent it yet | 12:36 |
| gnomefreak | im trying to break u-n atm | 12:37 |
| gnomefreak | l;ets hope that works | 12:37 |
| gnomefreak | asac: should flashplugin-installer depend on *-nonfree | 12:41 |
| gnomefreak | and the other way -nonfree depend on -installer | 12:41 |
| asac | gnomefreak: its all ok as it is atm | 12:42 |
| asac | -nonfree depends on installer ... but not the other way around | 12:42 |
| gnomefreak | asac: bug 365400 i marked as ubufox | 12:43 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 365400 in ubufox "Firefox doesn't detect flash plugin after upgrading from 8.10" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/365400 | 12:43 |
| gnomefreak | not sure exactly what he means, -installer is what? | 12:43 |
| asac | flashplugin-installer is the new package name | 12:44 |
| gnomefreak | for -nonfree? | 12:45 |
| asac | yes | 12:45 |
| gnomefreak | if so than it should install -nonfree when -installer is installed | 12:45 |
| gnomefreak | or at least use replaces | 12:46 |
| gnomefreak | sorry conflicts or replaces | 12:46 |
| gnomefreak | ok damnit where did the firefox bug about assertiuon error (not restarting after update? | 12:51 |
| gnomefreak | opps go | 12:51 |
| asac | gnomefreak: no ... it installs installer in case non free is installed | 12:52 |
| asac | just the other way around | 12:53 |
| asac | we migrate to installer and not to nonfree | 12:53 |
| gnomefreak | than installer should be enough to view flash? | 12:54 |
| asac | yes | 12:55 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i already asked on the bug | 12:55 |
| gnomefreak | k | 12:55 |
| asac | gnomefreak: when i say: "this is a bug in firefox, not ubufox, you dont need to say: "this isnt a bug in firefox" and invalidate that | 13:23 |
| asac | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 | 13:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 355112 in ubufox "Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 13:23 |
| asac | you did that to that bug | 13:23 |
| asac | fixed bug | 13:26 |
| gnomefreak | commented | 13:27 |
| gnomefreak | i missed a few posts that being one of them | 13:27 |
| asac | good | 13:29 |
| asac | no problem | 13:30 |
| gnomefreak | ok back to TV for a while. need break before FTBFS :) | 13:33 |
| gnomefreak | asac: when repling to mailing list i double click on the attachment and reply or i reply to the normal email? | 14:03 |
| apachelogger | ~order birthday package for asac | 14:08 |
| * kubotu is running to the corner shop to get a birthday present. | 14:08 | |
| * kubotu slides a birthday cake and a present down the bar to asac and gives everyone a nice frosty mug of beer. | 14:08 | |
| kubotu | Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday asac, happy birthday to you!!!! - Wooooho! | 14:08 |
| kubotu | Happy Birthday asac :D | 14:08 |
| kubotu | To your health! | 14:08 |
| * apachelogger hugs asac | 14:08 | |
| [reed] | ah, hippy barfday, asac | 14:08 |
| BUGabundo | bday? ohhhh happy b'day asac !!!! | 14:12 |
| armin76 | happy bday asacbuntu | 14:13 |
| gnomefreak | happy birthday asac for some reason i thought you just had one | 14:18 |
| gnomefreak | ok back to SM-2 again be back later (i hope later rather than sooner) | 14:20 |
| asac | thanks | 14:22 |
| asac | usually i dont announce my birthday ;) | 14:22 |
| asac | but today i had to because of this nice coincident | 14:22 |
| BUGabundo | eheheh | 14:23 |
| BUGabundo | so its asacbuntu | 14:24 |
| asac | right ;) | 14:24 |
| BUGabundo | or jaunty alex | 14:24 |
| asac | too bad i dont have a j ;) | 14:24 |
| BUGabundo | Alexander Jackalop | 14:24 |
| BUGabundo | LOLOL | 14:24 |
| asac | hehe | 14:25 |
| asac | anyway ... doing extended lunch now to celebrate this special moment ;) | 14:25 |
| BUGabundo | go a head | 14:27 |
| BUGabundo | have a slice of cake on me | 14:27 |
| BUGabundo | u deserv | 14:28 |
| gnomefreak | have a strong drink for me ;) | 14:32 |
| gnomefreak | for me and ill buy | 14:32 |
| * gnomefreak back to this broken crap | 14:33 | |
| armin76 | [reed]: did you saw the bugs where i cc'ed you? | 14:33 |
| [reed] | armin76: which one? | 14:37 |
| BUGabundo | gnomefreak: u just want to give him a bad liver | 14:38 |
| BUGabundo | smoke is bad enough already | 14:38 |
| gnomefreak | smoke drink bad but fun :) | 14:39 |
| armin76 | [reed]: yesterday, super-h related | 14:40 |
| [reed] | got bug #s? | 14:40 |
| [reed] | ah | 14:40 |
| [reed] | I see | 14:40 |
| [reed] | I skipped over those | 14:41 |
| [reed] | apparently | 14:41 |
| armin76 | :( | 14:41 |
| [reed] | ok, I've tagged reviewers | 14:42 |
| [reed] | that basically what you want? | 14:42 |
| armin76 | yup, thanks | 14:52 |
| gnomefreak | [reed]: was the pango patch commited upstream yet? | 15:05 |
| [reed] | I do believe so | 15:05 |
| [reed] | let me look | 15:06 |
| gnomefreak | [reed]: thanks | 15:06 |
| [reed] | mozilla bug 478871 | 15:08 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 478871 in GFX: Thebes "compile error 'struct _PangoFcFontMapClass' has no member named 'context_substitute' with pango 1.23" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478871 | 15:08 |
| [reed] | yep, fixed | 15:08 |
| gnomefreak | [reed]: thanks now it might build :) | 15:08 |
| gnomefreak | ok its at a safe point to walk away, be back to check on build later | 15:31 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| gnomefreak | 1687 people in #ubuntu :) and im still not here im just scared its going to fail | 15:59 |
| gnomefreak | damn thing still fails to build | 17:05 |
| asac | gnomefreak: sunbird? | 17:15 |
| asac | or sm2 | 17:15 |
| gnomefreak | sm2 | 17:15 |
| asac | how does it fail? | 17:15 |
| asac | same pango thing? | 17:16 |
| asac | probably didnt apply the patch | 17:16 |
| asac | properly | 17:16 |
| gnomefreak | asac: no its not pango give me a minute and ill post it | 17:19 |
| asac | k | 17:19 |
| gnomefreak | asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644076 | 17:22 |
| gnomefreak | i doubt its our bug | 17:23 |
| gnomefreak | looking upstream for bug but cant find the string errors anywhere. im here and eating and searching :) | 17:33 |
| gnomefreak | LP is still very very slow | 17:57 |
| [reed] | asac: heads-up, we're firedrilling | 19:10 |
| [reed] | "yay" | 19:10 |
| NCommander | Are there known issues with Firefox on SPARC? | 20:44 |
| g0ph3r | hi folks, after todays update of firefox 3.0.9, i can't start thunderbird anymore: it always gives only a segfault. i'm using ubuntu 8.10. what puzzled me a bit is that i could not find a bug about this... so i was wondering if this might be just me and stumbled in on here to check if this is already a known issue or not | 20:53 |
| g0ph3r | hm... well, i guess i'll try more tomorrow. it's getting late for me now | 21:03 |
| [reed] | NCommander: yes | 21:28 |
| NCommander | [reed], anything I can do to help? | 21:29 |
| [reed] | talk to armin76 | 21:29 |
| NCommander | armin76, ping | 21:30 |
| armin76 | NCommander: hi, whats up? | 22:02 |
| armin76 | oh | 22:04 |
| armin76 | NCommander: well, not much you can do, or yes, have a look at mozilla bug 448658 | 22:05 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 448658 in Phishing Protection "nsUrlClassifierDBService has bad alignment, causes SIGBUS" [Critical,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448658 | 22:05 |
| armin76 | look at my align.patch and find a solution for it so it works on msvc :) | 22:06 |
| asac | [reed]: *sigh* | 22:34 |
| NCommander | armin76, I can fix it on MSVC | 22:37 |
| asac | [reed]: hmm... no mail i see about the cause | 22:37 |
| asac | oh found something | 22:37 |
| NCommander | armin76, can we get it into karmic though (and maybe SRU into jaunty?) | 22:37 |
| asac | NCommander: the patch should land upstream ... then it will get automatically to all our releases | 22:41 |
| NCommander | asac, I want it fixed for the existing releases | 22:42 |
| NCommander | I actually have a SPARC box I care about | 22:42 |
| asac | "... then it will get automatically to all our releases" | 22:42 |
| NCommander | ... huh? | 22:42 |
| asac | all includes existing releases | 22:42 |
| * NCommander maybe missing how Mozilla is SRUed | 22:42 | |
| asac | NCommander: mozilla is SRUed monthly through -security ;) | 22:43 |
| NCommander | Neat | 22:43 |
| BUGabundo | asac: what are you doing here? go celebrate your bday with family and real world friends! | 22:45 |
| asac | heh. i already did ;) ... more to come on weekend | 22:45 |
| asac | but thanks ;) | 22:45 |
| BUGabundo | eheh np | 22:46 |
| NCommander | armin76, that build failure looks unrelated to the alignment change O_o; | 22:46 |
| kbrosnan | Mozilla is doing a 3.5b4 test day tomorrow http://quality.mozilla.org/events/2009/apr/24/firefox-35-beta-4-test-day any questions /msg me | 23:40 |
| BUGabundo | yay | 23:40 |
| NCommander | armin76, I'm looking into how to resolve this and fix on MSVC. SPARC alignment is similar to ARM so I think I can use some of the same tricks to fix it | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!