[00:00] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362352 [00:00] Launchpad bug 362352 in thunderbird "package thunderbird 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: files list file for package `xulrunner-1.9' contains empty filename" [Undecided,Incomplete] [00:00] am i tired or is the problem hard to identify ;) [00:00] i mean understanding his problem ;) [00:01] directhex: the one in the test page is similar [00:01] asac, i know, but i DEFINITELY got the ubufox window with my version [00:01] ah you do some data [00:01] i'll take a screenshot for posterity! [00:11] Hey all, a couple things I wanted to bring up [00:12] asac, http://www2.apebox.org/wordpress/picturebox-2/miscellanous-junk/?pid=220#picture_nav [00:12] In Jaunty w/Firefox 3.0.8, I was having major issues on Facebook when Adblock Plus was installed (even when completely deactivated). I couldn't do anything on FB - comment, see many pictures, etc... it wasn't until I completely removed Adblock that things actually started working again (even though, as I said, it was disabled) [00:13] Second thing, is there a way to remove the authentication from a closed tab so, say, someone can't come up to my browser instance and go history -> recently closed tabs, and re-open my, say, authenticated firewall config page? [00:23] directhex: yeah. thats how its supposed to work [00:23] Lns: have you tried a different adblock version? [00:24] asac: nope just tried the latest one from mozilla addons [00:24] asac, and DOES work! barring the whole "everyone on the internet uses plugin detection" issue [00:24] asac: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865 i believe (not on the same system but i'm sure this is it) [00:25] Lns: removing authentication from the tab is difficult ... especially if its session cookies. i dont think there is such a feature. guess you should close app (remember tabs) and start it to get that effect [00:25] oh another thing I noticed (in jaunty) when i install the adobe flash plugin, it doesn't ask me to restart, and when i re-visit the flash page it prompts me to install the plugin again. [00:25] Lns: its a bug that it prompts you again [00:25] it used to work without restart [00:25] asac: rgr [00:25] but something broke that [00:25] i haven't tracked that down [00:26] yet [00:26] no worries just thought i'd throw it out there =) [00:26] its known ;) [00:26] a bunch of bugs about that [00:26] cool...yeah the one that worried me the most was the closed tabs thing [00:26] its kind of an interesting idea [00:26] i can see both sides of the issue..but i'd have to think that most people would assume when the tab is closed your session w/the site is also closed [00:27] just like if yo uclose the browser window itself [00:27] maybe a feature that allows you to invalidate session cookies for current tab/page might exist in form of some extension [00:28] Lns: i know, but its difficult.maybe user has more tabs open from same site and so on [00:28] asac: there's no way for FF to know that the tab being closed is the last one from the site open, and therefore closes the session cookie? [00:28] i know i'm probably greatly trivializing it [00:30] maybe a 'treat tabs as windows' option or something [00:30] although i'm not sure if it's the case if you have multiple windows vs tabs [00:31] Lns: well. figuring out if its the last one is probably still doable. but the UI is not easy. [00:31] you do not want to do that by default it think [00:31] so either you make it upon request [00:31] or you have a pref the user can change for all sites [00:31] or you make that only for certain sites [00:32] like bank/launchpad/mozilla [00:32] why not do it by default? I'd think that's the more secure way [00:32] but also more annoying [00:32] some sites dont need that much security ;) [00:33] really? I mean, I'm just talking for myself but when i close a tab i'm pretty much done with it [00:33] but if you visit the site like 20 times a day and still close the page in between? [00:33] i would expect to have to log in again if i went back...it surprised me that it didn't [00:33] why not keep the tab open in those cases? :) [00:34] if you do like 300 things in a day [00:34] its easier to open what you need on demand [00:34] well that's a poweruser there [00:34] than searching for the tab you already have opened ;) [00:34] that would, i think, mandate some manual config to relax the security [00:34] depends how you define powerusers [00:34] a lot of users use the webbrowser all day [00:34] as i do, with at least 3-7 tabs open at all times [00:35] Lns: as i said its an interesting idea [00:35] just thought i'd throw it out there =) [00:35] thanks for listening ;) [00:36] i would think that was already discussed though. but we will see [00:36] i'd think so too [00:38] mozillla bug 307220 [00:38] Launchpad bug 307220 in tkgate "Error when tkgate starts simulator " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/307220 [00:38] mozillla bug 272030 [00:38] Launchpad bug 272030 in libass "please don't install ./usr/lib/libass.la" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272030 [00:39] Lns: ^^ [00:39] oops [00:39] thats wrong ;) [00:39] hehe [00:39] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117222 [00:39] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210466 [00:39] Mozilla bug 117222 in Networking: Cookies "Limit Scope of Session Cookies (new tabs and windows)" [Enhancement,Assigned] [00:39] Mozilla bug 210466 in UI Design "Cookie Manager does not respond to Ctrl+W "close window"" [Trivial,New] [00:40] last bug is differnet as it seems ;) [00:40] yeah those are a bit different, though related [00:41] so there's no way to force a second browser instance? [00:42] i guess that's why you get a "firefox is already running" ;) [00:42] which is kinda a pita when you close and rapidly re-open it [00:42] before it's done dying [00:43] to some degree thats te reason for that already running thing [00:44] the real reason is that it checks for X window to see if it needs to start a new process or send a command to an already running one [00:44] so if you start them quickly both will not see that window [00:44] and think: lets start a full new firefox [00:44] then the firefox process loosing the race fails wit hthat alert [00:46] yeah [00:46] too bad there's no easy way to do File -> New -> Session Window [00:47] I guess that's more along the lines of that bug thou [00:49] Oh well, back to work =) [00:51] i am off [00:52] bye asac [00:52] asac: yes. we know. ;-) [00:52] happy release party [00:53] asac: a little bit off, not to much that we will avoid you... :-) [02:03] 2am... guess I'm hitting the pillow! good release party everyone [08:49] asac, does ubufox have any greasemonkeyish ability to tweak a single web page? [09:20] directhex: no ;) ... thats what greasemonkey is for [09:22] asac, hm, i was wondering whether it'd work as a nice filthy hack for triggering the plugin finder [09:28] directhex: hmm [09:29] directhex: if you have an example greasescript that would detect that flash detection kit that would be indeed a great thing [09:30] asac, it doesn't need to be that complex really - every single "install silverlight" button on the internest ends up in the same place - http://go-mono.com/moonlight. so all you need to do is sniff the url [09:30] or i could smile sweetly at upstream to hax their page & detect jaunty [09:31] directhex: you mean fixigin Silverlight.js ? [09:32] asac, well, i mean just a hack for that one page to insert a 1 pixel SL control if jaunty is detected, regardless of silverlight.js [09:34] directhex: ah. ok. would be good, but finding such a grease script would be better ;) [09:35] asac, well, it's easy for silverlight - because Silverlight.js is pretty much the only detector in wide use, you just check to see if any of its methods are defined [09:36] directhex: if you could come up with a prototype that adds a " asac: what is RETR command in thunderbird? [10:05] gnomefreak: that looks like an IMAP protocol command [10:05] asac: i hope not since all the email addresses are pop [10:05] yeah seems to be a protocol command (could be imap or pop) [10:05] gnomefreak: why do you ask? [10:05] ah ok [10:06] asac: i got the error a few times today as well as a few last week [10:06] RETRieve [10:06] gnomefreak: so you get a dialog popup? [10:06] it issues the list of unpulled emails [10:06] BUGabundo: is that pop or imap (or both) [10:06] asac: yep [10:07] both AFAIK [10:07] most POPs [10:07] heh. tha t explains why i got a bunch of hits for imap on google too [10:07] says its a temorary problem [10:07] imap(s) uses last [10:07] *LAST [10:10] thx [10:10] asac: did you push 3.0.9 yet? [10:11] gnomefreak: if you see it a gain show me a screenshot please [10:11] (the RETR) [10:11] gnomefreak: its pushed [10:11] 8 hours ago i think [10:11] to jaunty-security [10:11] asac: ok will do. I'm getting a security announcment on 3.0.9 from the security mailing list [10:12] security pocket already opened? [10:12] from Jamie (not sure who it is but he is with Canonical [10:12] ) [10:15] gnomefreak: i just sent a dent about it [10:15] gnomefreak: jamie is jdstrand [10:15] (in this channel too) [10:15] eheh [10:15] u guys use and abuse all means of comunication [10:15] ah ok i havent loaded gwibber yet, its too early to deal with errors [10:15] email, im, irc, microblogs [10:16] lol [10:20] ok so most emails are in that small font while some are normal :( [10:23] gnomefreak: usual advcice: make a new TB profile and try to reproduce [10:25] * gnomefreak hates when people ignore emails [10:25] gnomefreak: i guess mails with html vs. plain text [10:25] BUGabundo: it doesnt happen all the time, so im fairly sure its not profile related [10:27] asac: that could be it is this more of a Ubuntu issue or Mozilla? [10:30] gnomefreak: most likely the user messed his font setup [10:30] at least if the difference is so that its annoying [10:30] (or its really just a few mails) [10:30] users should only allow simple html [10:30] asac: not a few but most are small some are normal [10:31] gnomefreak: what is selected in View -> Mesage Body As ? [10:31] use text or simple html [10:32] nothing [10:33] whould i need to restart Tbird? [10:33] if not than plain text didnt work [10:34] HTML doesnt help either [10:39] how are we handling the applicants to extension team? [10:41] gnomefreak: if we dont know them they get added to the cheering team [10:42] what name was that again? [10:42] https://edge.launchpad.net/~hanen105 [10:42] he joined lots of teams [10:42] gnomefreak: #ubuntu-release-party ;) ... you are not even there [10:42] gnomefreak: we reject him telling that teams are something to contribute first [10:43] gnomefreak: point him to the team we have set up [10:43] how was that called again? [10:43] mozilla squad [10:43] ubuntu-mozillasquad to be exact [10:43] gnomefreak: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozillasquad [10:43] yeah [10:44] he was already a member of the team still looking for more info on him [10:45] well. we dont know him ;) [10:45] reject him and tell him he should contribute here for a while first [10:46] kk [10:46] but given that he joined the daily team even [10:46] i would think he hasnt done this to contribute ;) [10:48] agreed [10:50] [10:50] my first javascript of 2009 [10:52] asac: i'm i right thinking that libgtkembedmoz is not available on xul 1.9? [10:54] asac: thanks for updating the mailing list admin [10:54] armin76: yes [10:54] asac: thanks :) [10:54] gnomefreak: i found out something good. i can reply to a mime part of the ml approval mail [10:54] to reject his mail [10:54] so i for rejection you dont even need to go to webinterface [10:54] on sweet [10:55] s/on/oh [10:55] same for approvals ... but you have to include the password in the reply to the -request (take care that that doesnt go to list or user if you want to try ;)) [10:55] gnomefreak: if you look at approval mails there should be two attachments [10:55] one is a snipped similar to what you get when you confirm your account on subscription [10:56] armin76: those folks need to use the glue [10:56] asac: bumb :) [10:56] ok i see attachments [10:56] armin76: 99.99% of those asking that at least dont know [10:57] gnomefreak: not sure if you can reply to an attachment in tbird. guess you would need to open it with double click first [10:57] gnomefreak: can you open such an attachment as a mail by clicking on it in tbird? [10:57] asac: yes [10:58] gnomefreak: yeah. so you should see instructions in there [10:58] i have it open [10:58] i didnt really understand the approval ... but the reection is easy ;) ... just reply [10:58] depends there are 2 attachments [10:58] without changing anyhting [10:58] gnomefreak: well. if you read the content you will see which is the right one [10:58] its pretty obvious [10:58] has a subject like "confirm ...." [10:59] ah ha found the right attachment [10:59] but i think thats a new feature. its definitly a new milestone in mailing list handling ;) [11:00] so for spam i just send a empty email with header and subject intact? === jtv1 is now known as jtv [11:02] gnomefreak: yeah. [11:02] gnomefreak: well you just hit reply [11:02] dont need to remove anything from body [11:02] just reply ... send [11:02] reply>send [11:02] yep [11:03] thats too easy [11:03] ;) [11:03] eheh [11:03] after having done a few you could start trying how the approval works [11:03] and then we get his pass [11:03] let me know if you find [11:03] i would think that you probably have to write [11:03] Approval: password [11:03] in the first line of the body [11:03] but the instructions are somewhat unclear [11:03] well leave me a few so i can try it out ;) [11:03] no worry [11:03] i dont read mail today till evening [11:04] that they are. but who runs it? [11:04] gnomefreak: what do you mean? [11:04] gnomefreak: oh. can you remove cruft from the mail admins page? [11:04] gnomefreak: i guess bluekuja is still in there [11:04] oh eait thats us nevermind, no sense in asking us to make it more clear [11:04] he certainly shouldnt get those mails anymore [11:05] lol [11:05] gnomefreak: ah i see. its mailman upstream freature i guess [11:05] gnomefreak: so mailman project ... or launchpad [11:05] more info on this would be great [11:05] they run those lists [11:05] gnomefreak: but maybe we can edit the text in the admin interface ;) [11:05] there goes the mirror [11:05] its out [11:06] gnomefreak: i would suggest to check mailman documentation [11:06] they probably explain that [11:06] ok i can do that this week i hope [11:07] gnomefreak: http://www.modwest.com/help/kb13-283.html [11:07] oh this cant be good [11:07] there is a bit more ... search for -request [11:07] anyway ... you will figure [11:08] ok they close the bug but say its not yet fixed in tbird b3pre [11:09] oh i see tbird's xul is being changed to 1.9.2a1pre [11:09] from 1.9.1 [11:09] oh no thats 3.1 [11:09] can we get that added to dailies [11:12] that didnt give me anything, i keep looking after smoke =>email [11:13] gnomefreak: i think we had a branch for 3.1 at some point [11:14] Planning for transition from FF 3.0 to FF 3.5 doesnt make sense i think someone messed the subject up [11:14] not sure if fta kept on maintaing that [11:14] ok i can ping him later if im here [11:14] gnomefreak: fta is away for a few weeks ;) [11:14] ok i wont ping him later ;) [11:14] he is doing kind of a long term trip ;) [11:16] i can use one of those too [11:16] ack++ [11:16] i could just go and live in the dschungle for a while [11:17] just next to a nice waterfall so i can cool myself down ;) [11:17] :) [11:17] be back smoke [11:40] * gnomefreak forgot to call babysitter [11:40] asac: take a look at but 105915 i dont see any auto filter [11:40] opps [11:41] bug 105915 [11:41] Launchpad bug 105915 in linux-source-2.6.17 "cant find mixer after update" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105915 [11:41] or not [11:41] bug 105918 [11:41] Launchpad bug 105918 in thunderbird "Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105918 [11:41] there you go [11:54] ooking [11:55] gnomefreak: do you have filteres. isnt there a filter* file somewhere in profile [11:55] ask user to attach that [11:55] ok will do [11:56] gnomefreak: its msgFilterRules.dat [11:56] its somewhere in the profile [11:57] i think in the directory of the account the filter was created for [11:57] i dont see it in mine [11:57] under default [11:58] no wonder im llooking in firefox :( [12:00] lol [12:00] asac: filterlog.html or the messagefilters...dat [12:00] gnomefreak: .mozilla-thunderbird [12:00] is tbird 2 [12:00] yep [12:00] .thunderbird-3.0 is tbir 3 [12:00] yeah i know [12:00] msgFilterRules.dat [12:01] yeap its the .dat [12:02] gnomefreak: you have jaunty-security lines for sources.list at hand? [12:02] yeah you sould too :) [12:02] gnomefreak: can you plesae post your lines [12:03] holy shit [12:03] they are not in there [12:03] thats a bad bug [12:04] -proposed is added but security isnt? this is default list from a clean install [12:04] gnomefreak: go to administration -> software sources and enable them ;) [12:05] they should be in /etc/apt/sources.list upon install, hint these repos are important [12:05] gnomefreak: they are in there if you install ... i am pretty sure [12:05] its just that i removed them manually i gues [12:05] as i usualyl run development release [12:05] and hence i dont ned them ;) [12:05] not here during last install maybe 3 weeks ago [12:07] maybe because its not final? [12:07] but people that use pre release will now have to add them [12:08] nah [12:08] i think its been in there since beta at least [12:08] i made a few test install after beta and it was in tere for sure [12:09] gnomefreak: -proposed is not enabled by default [12:09] and it needs a serious work!!! [12:09] it should use apt-listchanges to let the user know what BUG its testing [12:09] BUGabundo: i know but security repos are not in the sources.list [12:10] really? [12:10] clean install? [12:11] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644059 is from clean install around Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:47:46 -0400 [12:11] * gnomefreak doesnt see security in there [12:16] gnomefreak: [12:16] deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-security universe main multiverse restricted [12:16] thats strange [12:16] deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-security universe main multiverse restricted [12:16] deb http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/ubuntu/ jaunty-updates universe main multiverse restricted [12:16] deb-src http://ubuntu.intergenia.de/ubuntu/ jaunty-updates universe main multiverse restricted [12:16] i just added those [12:16] let me ask on +1 [12:18] gnomefreak: 2 ppl just checked and its there! [12:18] thats a stock list [12:18] i didnt touch that one [12:19] BUGabundo: also upgrade will have them [12:19] this is clean install [12:19] fresh install [12:19] thats what i asked [12:21] really strange [12:21] at lunch i'll try a kvm image [12:21] i'm getting confirmations of FF3.0.9 getting installed! [12:23] http://pastebin.com/m65f878e5 [12:28] asac: bug 365357 have you seen this problem? I havent in a while [12:28] Launchpad bug 365357 in xulrunner-1.9 "pkg did not install" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/365357 [12:30] yuck i dont think it is xulrunner but ill ask a few [12:36] gnomefreak: yes thats etcinsvk [12:36] thought so [12:36] i commented but i havent sent it yet [12:37] im trying to break u-n atm [12:37] l;ets hope that works [12:41] asac: should flashplugin-installer depend on *-nonfree [12:41] and the other way -nonfree depend on -installer [12:42] gnomefreak: its all ok as it is atm [12:42] -nonfree depends on installer ... but not the other way around [12:43] asac: bug 365400 i marked as ubufox [12:43] Launchpad bug 365400 in ubufox "Firefox doesn't detect flash plugin after upgrading from 8.10" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/365400 [12:43] not sure exactly what he means, -installer is what? [12:44] flashplugin-installer is the new package name [12:45] for -nonfree? [12:45] yes [12:45] if so than it should install -nonfree when -installer is installed [12:46] or at least use replaces [12:46] sorry conflicts or replaces [12:51] ok damnit where did the firefox bug about assertiuon error (not restarting after update? [12:51] opps go [12:52] gnomefreak: no ... it installs installer in case non free is installed [12:53] just the other way around [12:53] we migrate to installer and not to nonfree [12:54] than installer should be enough to view flash? [12:55] yes [12:55] gnomefreak: i already asked on the bug [12:55] k [13:23] gnomefreak: when i say: "this is a bug in firefox, not ubufox, you dont need to say: "this isnt a bug in firefox" and invalidate that [13:23] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 [13:23] Launchpad bug 355112 in ubufox "Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates" [Undecided,Confirmed] [13:23] you did that to that bug [13:26] fixed bug [13:27] commented [13:27] i missed a few posts that being one of them [13:29] good [13:30] no problem [13:33] ok back to TV for a while. need break before FTBFS :) [14:03] asac: when repling to mailing list i double click on the attachment and reply or i reply to the normal email? [14:08] ~order birthday package for asac [14:08] * kubotu is running to the corner shop to get a birthday present. [14:08] * kubotu slides a birthday cake and a present down the bar to asac and gives everyone a nice frosty mug of beer. [14:08] Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday asac, happy birthday to you!!!! - Wooooho! [14:08] Happy Birthday asac :D [14:08] To your health! [14:08] * apachelogger hugs asac [14:08] <[reed]> ah, hippy barfday, asac [14:12] bday? ohhhh happy b'day asac !!!! [14:13] happy bday asacbuntu [14:18] happy birthday asac for some reason i thought you just had one [14:20] ok back to SM-2 again be back later (i hope later rather than sooner) [14:22] thanks [14:22] usually i dont announce my birthday ;) [14:22] but today i had to because of this nice coincident [14:23] eheheh [14:24] so its asacbuntu [14:24] right ;) [14:24] or jaunty alex [14:24] too bad i dont have a j ;) [14:24] Alexander Jackalop [14:24] LOLOL [14:25] hehe [14:25] anyway ... doing extended lunch now to celebrate this special moment ;) [14:27] go a head [14:27] have a slice of cake on me [14:28] u deserv [14:32] have a strong drink for me ;) [14:32] for me and ill buy [14:33] * gnomefreak back to this broken crap [14:33] [reed]: did you saw the bugs where i cc'ed you? [14:37] <[reed]> armin76: which one? [14:38] gnomefreak: u just want to give him a bad liver [14:38] smoke is bad enough already [14:39] smoke drink bad but fun :) [14:40] [reed]: yesterday, super-h related [14:40] <[reed]> got bug #s? [14:40] <[reed]> ah [14:40] <[reed]> I see [14:41] <[reed]> I skipped over those [14:41] <[reed]> apparently [14:41] :( [14:42] <[reed]> ok, I've tagged reviewers [14:42] <[reed]> that basically what you want? [14:52] yup, thanks [15:05] [reed]: was the pango patch commited upstream yet? [15:05] <[reed]> I do believe so [15:06] <[reed]> let me look [15:06] [reed]: thanks [15:08] <[reed]> mozilla bug 478871 [15:08] Mozilla bug 478871 in GFX: Thebes "compile error 'struct _PangoFcFontMapClass' has no member named 'context_substitute' with pango 1.23" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478871 [15:08] <[reed]> yep, fixed [15:08] [reed]: thanks now it might build :) [15:31] ok its at a safe point to walk away, be back to check on build later === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [15:59] 1687 people in #ubuntu :) and im still not here im just scared its going to fail [17:05] damn thing still fails to build [17:15] gnomefreak: sunbird? [17:15] or sm2 [17:15] sm2 [17:15] how does it fail? [17:16] same pango thing? [17:16] probably didnt apply the patch [17:16] properly [17:19] asac: no its not pango give me a minute and ill post it [17:19] k [17:22] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644076 [17:23] i doubt its our bug [17:33] looking upstream for bug but cant find the string errors anywhere. im here and eating and searching :) [17:57] LP is still very very slow [19:10] <[reed]> asac: heads-up, we're firedrilling [19:10] <[reed]> "yay" [20:44] Are there known issues with Firefox on SPARC? [20:53] hi folks, after todays update of firefox 3.0.9, i can't start thunderbird anymore: it always gives only a segfault. i'm using ubuntu 8.10. what puzzled me a bit is that i could not find a bug about this... so i was wondering if this might be just me and stumbled in on here to check if this is already a known issue or not [21:03] hm... well, i guess i'll try more tomorrow. it's getting late for me now [21:28] <[reed]> NCommander: yes [21:29] [reed], anything I can do to help? [21:29] <[reed]> talk to armin76 [21:30] armin76, ping [22:02] NCommander: hi, whats up? [22:04] oh [22:05] NCommander: well, not much you can do, or yes, have a look at mozilla bug 448658 [22:05] Mozilla bug 448658 in Phishing Protection "nsUrlClassifierDBService has bad alignment, causes SIGBUS" [Critical,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448658 [22:06] look at my align.patch and find a solution for it so it works on msvc :) [22:34] [reed]: *sigh* [22:37] armin76, I can fix it on MSVC [22:37] [reed]: hmm... no mail i see about the cause [22:37] oh found something [22:37] armin76, can we get it into karmic though (and maybe SRU into jaunty?) [22:41] NCommander: the patch should land upstream ... then it will get automatically to all our releases [22:42] asac, I want it fixed for the existing releases [22:42] I actually have a SPARC box I care about [22:42] "... then it will get automatically to all our releases" [22:42] ... huh? [22:42] all includes existing releases [22:42] * NCommander maybe missing how Mozilla is SRUed [22:43] NCommander: mozilla is SRUed monthly through -security ;) [22:43] Neat [22:45] asac: what are you doing here? go celebrate your bday with family and real world friends! [22:45] heh. i already did ;) ... more to come on weekend [22:45] but thanks ;) [22:46] eheh np [22:46] armin76, that build failure looks unrelated to the alignment change O_o; [23:40] Mozilla is doing a 3.5b4 test day tomorrow http://quality.mozilla.org/events/2009/apr/24/firefox-35-beta-4-test-day any questions /msg me [23:40] yay [23:49] armin76, I'm looking into how to resolve this and fix on MSVC. SPARC alignment is similar to ARM so I think I can use some of the same tricks to fix it