[00:21] <NCommander> armin76, your patch nolonger applies to the upstream source :-/
[08:42] <armin76> NCommander: i'll have a look
[08:42] <armin76> NCommander: the patch was pretty recent as you see
[08:44] <armin76> NCommander: it applies for me
[08:45] <armin76> NCommander: it should apply to mozilla-central trunk
[08:45] <armin76> patch -p1 < attachment.cgi\?id\=372899
[08:45] <armin76> patching file toolkit/components/url-classifier/src/nsUrlClassifierDBService.cpp
[11:05] <guidog> asac: Hi, did you have a look at the icedove-3.0 patches?
[11:35] <armin76> [reed]: why is fx3.0.10 going out sooner than expected?
[11:45] <asac> armin76: regress
[11:49] <gnomefreak> asac: 1.0.9 had a regression fixed in .10?
[11:49] <gnomefreak> eh
[11:49] <gnomefreak> 3.0.9 even
[11:50] <gnomefreak> oh where is he when you need him
[11:50] <[reed]> armin76: security issue and a stability issue
[11:50] <gnomefreak> i see gwibber bugs are fixed in trunk so far the first 2 i have looked at
[11:50] <[reed]> and it's really just 3.0.9 + two fixes
[11:51] <gnomefreak> nobody speaks English on Gwibber, well at leasst seems that way
[11:51] <armin76> [reed]: :) thanks
[11:54] <asac> guidog: hi. great to have you here. i havent looked yet ... still fighting a bit the release hang-over ;)
[11:55] <gnomefreak> ok how do you use the shorten link feature on gwibber?
[11:55] <asac> gnomefreak: go to preferences and enable it
[11:55] <gnomefreak> i did i thought
[11:55] <asac> once you do that it will automatically shorten urls you paste
[11:56] <asac> gnomefreak: it only shortens urls that are pasted i think
[11:56] <gnomefreak> oh damn forgot reinstall of ubuntu
[11:56] <asac> not typed
[11:56] <gnomefreak> asac: when i reinstalled i forgot to upadte prefferences
[11:57] <gnomefreak> asac: thanks
[11:59] <guidog> asac: no worries, take your time. I won't be doing anything on this anyway until next week.
[12:00] <asac> guidog: ok great. btw ... the .daily branches are not really ment to be something you base work on
[12:01] <asac> guidog: the .head branches are always the latests patch state ... the .dailies are just for the bot and when the build fails we bump the changelog version in .head
[12:01] <asac> after fixing it
[12:02] <asac> doesnt make a big difference ... except that the .dailies have zillions of daily commits which we usually dont want in the bzr log
[12:02] <asac> as they are just commits of changelog
[12:06] <NCommander> armin76, oh, I tried to apply it to the Ubuntu source package :-/
[12:06] <guidog> asac: I can move the patches over to .daily. Is there an easy way to do this with bzr like git-format-patch, git-am
[12:07] <armin76> NCommander: :)
[12:11] <asac> guidog: i think there is ;) have to check how though
[12:12] <NCommander> armin76, whats odd in xulrunner the same file it needs to patch is there ...
[12:14] <gnomefreak> !coc
[12:14] <ubottu> The Ubuntu Code of Conduct to which we ask all Ubuntu users to adhere can be found at http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/
[12:16] <gnomefreak> no thats not for you guys
[12:16] <asac> mozilla bug 489322
[12:16] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 489322 in Layout "3.0.10 pre crashes with HTML validator when viewing source [@ @0x0 | nsTextFrame::ClearTextRun() ]" [Critical,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489322
[12:17] <gnomefreak> asac: when you get a minute please look at bug 105918 either he only has one filter or well not sure
[12:17] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 105918 in thunderbird "Thunderbird 'Create filter from message' should use 'To' instead of 'From'" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105918
[12:30] <[reed]> is it normal for a computer to be 75C?
[12:33] <NCommander> armin76, is there a good guide to building Mozilla from VCS?
[12:35] <armin76> NCommander: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Mozilla_Source_Code_(Mercurial)
[12:35] <[reed]> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Build_Documentation
[12:35] <[reed]> or that
[12:36] <NCommander> Thanks, I'm going to try and build Firefox from source .... I feel like I should run now, very fast :-/
[12:36] <gnomefreak> asac: did you get a chance to look at the build failure?
[12:38] <gnomefreak> im thinking its only a Sm2 problem
[12:42] <gnomefreak> bug 252215
[12:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 252215 in flashplugin-nonfree "Flashplugin-nonfree stops voice record on Skype" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/252215
[12:54] <asac> gnomefreak: i think i missed your post with more details on the build failure
[12:54] <gnomefreak> ok i can post it again if you want me to
[12:55] <asac> yes please
[12:56] <gnomefreak> k
[12:56] <gnomefreak> asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644183
[12:56] <gnomefreak> thanks for looking
[12:58] <asac> gnomefreak: thats a missing bump of lower bound for nspr/nss in debian/rules
[12:58] <gnomefreak> looking
[12:59] <asac> gnomefreak: look at revision 440 on xulrunner-1.9.2.head
[12:59] <asac> branch
[12:59] <asac> thats what you need to pick i guess
[12:59] <gnomefreak> ok
[12:59] <gnomefreak> wait doesnt SM2 use 1.9.2?
[13:00] <gnomefreak> i guess not
[13:00] <asac> gnomefreak: it might have in-source 1.9.2
[13:00] <asac> but it doesnt build against system xul
[13:00] <asac> (yet)
[13:02] <gnomefreak> i see
[13:02] <gnomefreak> rev 440 in the mozillateam PPA?
[13:05] <gnomefreak> i found it
[13:07] <gnomefreak> you have got ot be kidding me lol just change to 3.12.3
[13:12] <asac> gnomefreak: in 1.9.2 branch ;)
[13:12] <gnomefreak> oh crap
[13:13] <gnomefreak> yeah
[13:13] <asac> gnomefreak: yes the fix is simple just one line
[13:13] <gnomefreak> * Bump requirement for system nss to >= 3.12.3 since Mozilla bug 485052 landed - update debian/rules
[13:13] <gnomefreak> that one
[13:13] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 485052 in Security: PSM "Embed a list of default OCSP Responder URLs for certain CAs" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485052
[13:13] <asac> 1.9.2 got higher nss requirements and we dont have it in archive yet
[13:13] <asac> so that rules magic takes care it automatically uses in-source nss
[13:13] <gnomefreak> ah
[13:16] <gnomefreak> ok getting ready to build while im outside working in yard for a few
[13:25] <gnomefreak> well that didnt work :( i need to lay pipe to house and shop since we are getting city water out here still in middle of no where. well g/f needed bird bath moved and it weighs about 70 pounds (both peices) and hurt my back on bowl part
[13:27] <asac> gnomefreak: what didnt work?
[13:27] <asac> gnomefreak: show the bzr diff please
[13:27] <gnomefreak> asac: the idea of laying the pipe
[13:27] <asac> ouch
[13:27] <asac> yeah
[13:27] <gnomefreak> asac: ok in a minute
[13:30] <gnomefreak> lol it shows nothing but i swear i changed it
[13:31] <gnomefreak> maybe because i commited it already?
[13:32] <gnomefreak> it was due to commit
[13:33] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. you can diff it by
[13:33] <asac> bzr diff -c REVISION
[13:33] <gnomefreak> i uncommited and bzr diffed the rules file
[13:34] <asac> yeah show it now ;)
[13:34] <gnomefreak> asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644185
[13:34] <gnomefreak> sorry i have ops calling me so im a little slow due to that
[13:35] <asac> gnomefreak: that line is wrong ... its replace nspr with nss ;)
[13:36] <asac> now sure why you have nspr there ... ;)
[13:36] <gnomefreak> oh
[13:36] <asac> i think we had that bug a long time ago ... maybe sm never got the fix
[13:36] <gnomefreak> thats not what the diff showed in rev 440
[13:36] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah. but it didnt show nspr at all ;)
[13:37] <asac> but you are excused ... you acted logically ... ;)
[13:37] <gnomefreak> ok so i'm updating both or just nspr?
[13:41] <asac> gnomefreak: err ... you change the same line you did in the same way. just also replace nspr with nss in that line
[13:41] <gnomefreak> oh
[13:42] <gnomefreak> i already have a nspr section
[13:43] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. leave that untouched
[13:43] <gnomefreak> k
[13:43] <asac> gnomefreak: its just a bug i nthat line .... that never should have been nspr >= 3...
[13:43] <asac> but nss >= ..
[13:45] <gnomefreak> asac: look better? http://pastebin.mozilla.org/644187
[13:47] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. thats better ;)
[13:47] <asac> should work and you can lay pipes ;)
[13:47] <gnomefreak> asac: ok cool back to building :)
[13:48] <gnomefreak> ok what package is new wave theme in?
[13:48] <gnomefreak> nm i see it
[13:52] <gnomefreak> do we know if KK toolchain is in place?
[13:52] <gnomefreak> ill be back need smoke
[13:56]  * gnomefreak back for a while
[14:17] <gnomefreak> ok asac this flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-installer i'm not getting. -installer conflicts with nonfree. installing nonfree makes flash work where as installer does not make flash work
[14:17] <gnomefreak> and he left
[14:20] <asac> ubottu: asd
[14:20] <ubottu> Sorry, I don't know anything about asd
[14:20] <asac> reconnect
[14:20] <gnomefreak> asac: you left at bad time :(
[14:20] <gnomefreak> .:09:17:08:. <      gnomefreak > ok asac this  flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-installer i'm  not getting. -installer conflicts with  nonfree. installing nonfree makes flash work  where as installer does not make flash work
[14:20] <gnomefreak> see bug 363124
[14:20] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 363124 in flashplugin-nonfree "Flash Doesn't Work After 9.04 AMD64 Upgrade" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/363124
[14:21] <asac> gnomefreak: you can reproduce that?
[14:21] <gnomefreak> not sure ill test now
[14:23] <gnomefreak> it seems i only had installer installed but removing it and trying again
[14:23] <asac> gnomefreak: thats good. i mean installer should work
[14:24] <asac> not sure whats up with this guy
[14:24] <asac> i read that bug too i remember
[14:24] <gnomefreak> maybe its nspluginwrapper not playing well with flash*-installer?
[14:25] <gnomefreak> well scott is on 32bit
[14:27] <asac> gnomefreak: see the forum thread. they just seem to have gnash and swfdec installed too
[14:27] <asac> and they have a messed up alternatives system state
[14:27] <gnomefreak> it works here just fine
[14:28] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah. invalid bug. tell them to remove gnash/swfdec and reinstall -installer package
[14:28] <gnomefreak> ok
[15:05] <kbrosnan> Mozilla is holding a test day for the next 12 hours. Testing Firefox 3.5b4 release canidate http://quality.mozilla.org/blogs/firefox-35-beta-4-testday-friday-april-24
[15:08] <asac> kbrosnan: is 1.9.1 branc still b4pre (aka b4)?
[15:08] <asac> or did you create a mini branch?
[15:09] <asac> kbrosnan: otherwise ubuntu users can use the current 3.5 daily we have ;) (we didnt do a b4 build yet)
[15:09] <kbrosnan> today's daily should be 3.5pre
[15:09] <asac> k
[15:29] <gnomefreak> dont we have a master bug about firefox is already running dialog?
[15:32] <gnomefreak> upstream really needs to do house keeping
[15:37] <asac> gnomefreak: not sure if w ehave  a master already. if not we can certainly create one
[15:37] <gnomefreak> i thought we did but i cant find any of them other than the one im looking at
[16:20] <newz2000> I just updated my firefox
[16:20] <newz2000> and it has been running at 100% cpu from the moment it started
[16:20] <newz2000> It actually popped up a dialog box but I didn't see it because I was typing
[16:20] <newz2000> I pressed the letters bu and it closed before I even got to read it
[16:21] <newz2000> maybe the dialog said, "do you want firefox to consume all of your cpus resources and be unresponsive? If so, press the letter 'b'" -> "Are you sure? Press the letter 'u' to confirm"
[16:23] <newz2000> wow, it's also using 47% of system memory
[16:32] <gnomefreak> i think jockey is borked badly
[18:42] <gnomefreak> has anyone tried to install using desktop cd? I cant find the choice for encrypted fs and ext4
[18:42] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: ext4 is using manual disc
[18:42] <BUGabundo> and then choose de FS
[18:42] <BUGabundo> for the encr there's an option on the last 2 tabs
[18:43] <gnomefreak> manual disk? you mean text installer
[18:45] <gnomefreak> well i have system backwards atm and my devel install is borked so im going to try it again
[18:46] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: no
[18:46] <BUGabundo> Desktop
[18:47] <BUGabundo> the part where you choose the disk volumes
[18:47] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: using F4
[18:47] <BUGabundo> F4 ?
[18:47] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: its not there i looked everywhere
[18:47] <BUGabundo> it is!
[18:47] <BUGabundo> lol
[18:47] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: F4 gives you alternate install ways
[18:47] <BUGabundo> all your systems are borked
[18:47] <BUGabundo> even still to install
[18:47] <BUGabundo> eheh
[18:48] <BUGabundo> from DVD, not CD right?
[18:48] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: it isnt. i get to choose manual partitions full disk
[18:48] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: cd
[18:48] <gnomefreak> choosing manual partition doesnt even give me choice to resize it
[18:49] <gnomefreak> ok ill download dvd and try
[18:49] <gnomefreak> be back in a few
[18:49] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: I haven't tested alternate cd in a while
[18:49] <BUGabundo> not even the livecd via ubiquity installer?
[18:49] <BUGabundo> no need to boot destop
[18:50] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo: nope that is what i used
[18:51] <BUGabundo> strange
[18:51] <BUGabundo> it should be the same
[18:51] <BUGabundo> I'll try to boot kvm image latter
[18:51] <BUGabundo> after my jaunty presentaion
[18:51] <BUGabundo> and see if its there or not
[18:51] <gnomefreak> cd i have was daily 20090411
[18:51] <BUGabundo> but since SO MANY users are installling it, its strage you dotn see it
[18:51] <BUGabundo> 11??????
[18:51] <BUGabundo> that's to old!
[18:52] <BUGabundo> maybe those are the ones the actually lacked it
[18:52] <BUGabundo> cj fixed it
[18:52] <BUGabundo> there was a bug for it
[18:52] <gnomefreak> no it was last week i have it marked wrong
[18:52] <BUGabundo> gnomefreak: rsync them
[18:52] <BUGabundo> 21 ?
[18:52] <gnomefreak> no 16017 maybe
[18:52] <gnomefreak> 16-17
[18:54] <gnomefreak> ill be back
[18:54] <BUGabundo> _terminator_ is Gone
[19:11] <gnomefreak> downloading dvd atm
[19:12] <gnomefreak> asac: that SM2 fix still FTBFS
[19:13] <gnomefreak> looks like same erros see: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25931498/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.seamonkey-2.0_2.0~b1~hg20090423r2462%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~jjv_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[19:13]  * gnomefreak was hoping to get lucky so i didnt test here :(
[19:29] <gnomefreak> ok how do i use rsync to grab the iso? i never did figure rsync out :(
[23:44] <gnomefreak> ok someone tell me how the hell to get u-m to stay the frig down
[23:44] <gnomefreak> no matter what i do it wont stay down
[23:46] <gnomefreak> in software sources i have unchecked "check for updates" in gconf i unchecked everything in u-m im running out of ideas