[07:18] Hi, all. I'm trying to install ubuntu-9.04-umpc on asus eepc 900. Md5sum - correct. CD Test reporting error in 1 file (try on 2 flash drives). UNR work very slow. Glxgears - 18 fps. [08:06] I put ubuntu-umpc to flash and and run md5sum: ./pool/main/p/ppp/ppp_2.4.5~git20081126t100229-0ubuntu2_i386.deb: No such file or directory [08:29] n0s0r0g, this is a known bug, let me find the bug number [08:30] n0s0r0g, bug 360925 [08:30] Launchpad bug 360925 in mobile-meta "md5sum check of UNR image fails in one file" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/360925 [08:31] thekorn, so the image is "correct"? I can install it? [08:32] n0s0r0g, yes it has been verified that the image is correct [08:32] it's the md5sum.txt which has the "wrong" path for this file [08:33] thekorn, What about very slow graphic perfomance on asus eeepc 900? glxgears = 18-20 fps. UI is very slow. [08:36] n0s0r0g, soory have not seen a bug about it, what graphic card is this device using? [08:36] graphic performance on my eeepc 1000 is ok [08:36] thekorn, Intel 915GM [08:38] n0s0r0g, ah ok,afaik there are known issues with intel graphic chips, and I'm sure a lot of bugreports about it on launchpad.net [08:39] this is also mentionened in the release notes [08:39] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JauntyJackalope/ReleaseNotes#Performance%20regressions%20on%20Intel%20graphics%20cards [09:09] thekorn, Boot from ubuntu-i386 LiveCD on eeepc900: graphics works fine. Glxgears ~130-140 fps. [09:13] thekorn, So, slow graphic perfomance on Intel i915GM is only in ubuntu-UMPC... [09:19] n0s0r0g, ok, that sounds good, why not using this on your eeepc? [09:20] maybe you should talk to the people at #ubuntu-mobile about your experiences [09:20] thekorn, ok, thanks. === asac_ is now known as asac [15:20] the owner of ubot4 might want to inhibit replies to ubottu output (actually, ubottu might also do the same). See #ubuntu-bugs for an example (at least it does not go forever)