[08:48] <asac> hi
[08:49] <asac> we  have access to bot, but only through branches
[09:06] <asac> [reed]: do you have mh's bugzilla email address?
[10:00] <[reed]> asac: mh+mozilla@glandium.org, no?
[10:06] <asac> [reed]: ah yeah. sounds familiar ... think we should CC him on that bug?
[10:06] <[reed]> what bug?
[10:06] <asac> THE ;)
[10:06] <[reed]> there are two...
[10:06] <[reed]> this release fixes two bugs
[10:07] <asac> [reed]: yeah. but one is public isnt it?
[10:07] <[reed]> yes
[10:07] <[reed]> wel
[10:07] <[reed]> well
[10:07] <[reed]> in a way
[10:34] <armin76> why not me? :(
[10:34]  * armin76 stabs asac 
[11:34] <asac> armin76: stabbing is not nice either ;)
[11:38] <armin76> !info sqlite3 karmic
[11:38] <armin76> when is that going to be available? :P
[11:49] <asac> no clue ;)
[12:16] <armin76> asac: wrt the sparc failure, may want to add --disable-jit if arch is sparc until bug 486584
[12:17] <armin76> until mozilla bug 486584 gets fixed
[12:19] <asac> armin76: yes. i would think that makes sense
[12:19] <asac> armin76: but you should ask on #spidermonkey or so on mozill achannels
[12:22] <armin76> stupid sun, i can't believe how a company can screw its sparc users
[12:23] <asac> they simply prefer solaris ;)
[12:24] <armin76> the change should be backed
[12:24] <armin76> [reed]: do it! :P
[12:32] <asac> armin76: you can ask for blocking?
[12:33] <asac> and suggest to backout until thats fixed?
[12:33] <asac> or was blocking already denied?
[12:33] <armin76> asac: doubt they care for sparc
[12:34] <asac> armin76: well. at least asking ... not sure if they care more for sparc/linux vs. solaris ;)
[12:42]  * armin76 suggests asac does it 
[13:15] <asac> armin76: why not use mikes code to make a patch?
[13:19] <asac> argh ....bz is slow :(
[13:20] <asac> bugzilla ;)
[13:34] <armin76> asac: i have no clue how to do it :)
[20:27] <eagles0513875> hey guys thought i would bring this bug to yalls attention
[20:27] <eagles0513875> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: SKS 1.0.10  mI0ESXSXZAEEAMJk6IDrIaNpH0HnyiInJB0E39qpktQpuFTRa4+mlRR/1Sh9lT/cOkfN6OSk Hyq2jcPm5IsonJNeLSqm2gtGHtITw4T88V5WqjOjZGXZTHZqOqCb138+ftE/62E7JETjXbg6 MyG6EF03FAcFG1U2GkvzykQpYbj6i4SdTAPjPowfABEBAAG0IUxhdW5jaHBhZCbug 365632
[20:27] <eagles0513875> mt sry bout that
[20:28] <eagles0513875> bug 365632 is what i would like to bring to your attention
[20:59] <asac> eagles0513875: have you tried to disable your extensions?`
[21:00] <eagles0513875> asac: im not having the problem
[21:00] <eagles0513875> im letting you guys know about the bug of the person who reported it
[21:01] <asac> yeha. extensions are often the problem
[21:01] <asac> hmm he says he tried with all disabled
[21:02] <eagles0513875> asac: i wish i coudl do more but im still a novice when it comes to bug fixing
[21:24] <eagles0513875> asac: bug 365632 also same issue in 3.9
[21:25] <eagles0513875> or what ever the other version is in the repos
[22:36] <BUGabundo> guud evening
[22:42] <asac> [reed]: i still see 489647 on linux upstream builds crashing
[22:42] <[reed]> really?
[22:43] <marnold> Hello could someone review this debdiff http://paste.ubuntu.com/159639/ its tagged for karmic but i'm thinking of trying for an SRU
[22:44] <asac> [reed]: please test too: downoad 3.0.10 build and open the testcase
[22:44] <marnold> should I rename the binary packages
[22:45] <asac> Nafallo: good question. is there a bug filed against debian package?
[22:45] <asac> err marnold
[22:45] <asac> ^^
[22:47] <marnold> no its a Ubuntu speific change because of iceweasel not being available in ubuntu archive
[22:47] <asac> marnold: well. debian shouldnt prefix their package with iceweasel
[22:47] <asac> thats what i ment
[22:48] <asac> just vimperator would be good enough
[22:48] <marnold> hmm the practice seems  to be widespread though
[22:48] <[reed]> asac: I'm not crashing on https://bug489647.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=374249
[22:49] <marnold> shall i file a bug in Debian then
[22:49] <asac> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=374249
[22:49] <[reed]> not crashing...
[22:49] <asac> marnold: yes please. ask him kindly to rename his binary package and keep us updated
[22:53] <asac> [reed]: seems to be racy. when running under strace it doesnt crash, but if i start it without strace it always crashes
[22:53] <marnold> asac, are there any other bugreports of this sort in Debian
[22:53] <asac> [reed]: where can i see submitted crash reports?
[22:53] <[reed]> crash-reports.mozilla.com
[22:54] <[reed]> go to about:crashes
[22:54] <[reed]> in your browser
[22:54] <[reed]> are you sure you're on 3.0.10?
[22:54] <asac> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042315 Firefox/3.0.10
[22:55] <asac> i moved .mozilla away
[22:55] <[reed]> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042315 Firefox/3.0.10
[22:55] <asac> start ffox
[22:55] <[reed]> that's what I have
[22:55] <asac> and just open the attachment
[22:56] <asac> looks identify
[22:56] <asac> identical
[22:56] <[reed]> about:crashes
[22:56] <[reed]> what's your bpid?
[22:56] <asac> http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/16920e9e-d7bb-46f2-a7e5-6d2122090427?p=1
[22:56] <asac> that sucks ;)
[23:00] <asac> jdstrand: could you please download mozilla build and run the testcase ;)? just in case i have messed something up that i dont see.
[23:00] <asac> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0.10/linux-i686/en-US/firefox-3.0.10.tar.bz2
[23:01] <jdstrand> asac: I am in the process of checking the ones in ubuntu-mozilla-security, but can also check that one
[23:02] <asac> jdstrand: check the upstream one first please ;)
[23:02] <asac> jdstrand: [reed] didnt see and, while i can reproduce it if i dont atttach strace
[23:03] <asac> i need a third opinion
[23:03] <[reed]> asac: is your clock way off?
[23:03] <[reed]> your crash report says April 17th
[23:03] <asac> [reed]: no its not. how can remove crashes i have in about:crashes?
[23:04] <asac> so its clean and i can submit a new one?
[23:04] <[reed]> you don't have to remove any
[23:04] <[reed]> but there's a button on that page
[23:04] <[reed]> if you crash again, you'll get brekpad
[23:04] <[reed]> breakpad
[23:06] <asac> [reed]: new id: http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/pending/34ac9c9a-9a6d-4ce6-b4e7-7ace62090427
[23:06] <[reed]> I've tried on both intrepid and jaunty
[23:06] <[reed]> new profiles
[23:07] <[reed]> mozilla.org builds
[23:07] <asac> still has apr 17
[23:07] <jdstrand> asac, [reed]: 3.0.10 from mozilla.org did not crash.
[23:07] <[reed]> I cannot reproduce
[23:07] <jdstrand> this is on jaunty/i386 using the reproducer in the bug as a local file (which crashes jaunty 3.0.9)
[23:07] <[reed]> oh, that's your kernel date... juanb thought that was your submit
[23:07] <asac> jdstrand: i use it as remote file even
[23:07] <asac> just clicking on it
[23:08] <jdstrand> I simply did:
[23:08] <asac> i didnt have a crash once or twice so maybe tried a bunch of times
[23:08] <jdstrand> tar -jxf ./firefox*bz2
[23:08] <jdstrand> cd ./firefox
[23:08] <jdstrand> ./firefox
[23:09] <[reed]> [05:09:08PM] <ss> That's still a different crash.
[23:09] <[reed]> [05:09:18PM] <ss> Should crash in nsTextFrame
[23:09] <[reed]> jdstrand: are you on karmic?
[23:10] <[reed]> or jaunty?
[23:10] <jdstrand> up to date jaunty
[23:10] <asac> jaunty
[23:10] <[reed]> asac: you're on jaunty, too?
[23:10] <asac> yes
[23:10] <[reed]> weird
[23:10] <asac> i think karmic isnt even open
[23:10] <asac> i better go back home then ;)
[23:10] <asac> oh damn ... i am home ;)
[23:10] <jdstrand> I just did 20 times and no crash
[23:10] <[reed]> yeah, can't reproduce this
[23:10] <jdstrand> this is in a kvm VM
[23:10] <asac> hell whats going on ;)
[23:10] <asac> maybe its a font issue
[23:10] <jdstrand> (again, i386)
[23:11] <jdstrand> chroot problem?
[23:12] <asac> no its a real install
[23:12] <asac> its i386
[23:12] <BUGabundo> chroot 32bits->64 or viceversa will fail with a lausy error message
[23:12] <jdstrand> could an old .mozilla be causing an issue?
[23:12] <BUGabundo> I think I reported that a while ago
[23:13] <asac> jdstrand: i remove .mozilla for this test
[23:13] <asac> i have fresh profile and all
[23:13] <asac> crashes 100% if i dont use strace or gdb
[23:13] <asac> but maybe i am just on crack ;)
[23:15] <jdstrand> asac: fyi, I did my test with a new user as well
[23:15] <asac> jdstrand: have you checked on your real install?
[23:15] <asac> jdstrand: it seems to need speed (e.g. with strace -f -eopen it doesnt happen)
[23:16] <jdstrand> asac: real as in my personal system? no. but these VMs are as real as they get. stock ubuntu-desktop installs
[23:17] <jdstrand> btw, ff 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 with xr 1.9.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 also works fine under the new user
[23:17] <jdstrand> I'm going to try with an existing user now
[23:17] <asac> jdstrand: yes. but what i mean is that its kind of performance sensitive ... when i slow down the process it seems to happen less likely
[23:18] <asac> but i guess you understood that ;)
[23:18] <jdstrand> existing user is fine
[23:18] <[reed]> asac is just cursed.
[23:18] <jdstrand> the VM is fast, but I can try it on my system
[23:19] <asac> maybe i should reboot :-P lol
[23:22] <jdstrand> asac: ok, tried it in my personal system, it no longer crashes
[23:23] <jdstrand> intel core duo 2.4 GHz... (fast enough?)
[23:23] <jdstrand> :P
[23:23] <asac> how annoying
[23:24] <jdstrand> asac: I just reloaded 40 times with no crash
[23:28] <asac> jdstrand: ok. guess thats enough then ;)
[23:29] <jdstrand> for giggles I even removed the control characters, still works fine