[01:32] <[reed]> armin76: ping [03:38] hey quick question -- have you guys packaged seamonkey 2.0a3 [09:49] [reed]: pong, i know, the superh bug [10:01] [reed]: answered [10:02] superh? [10:02] yup [10:04] asac: don't like? :D [10:05] armin76: what is superh? [10:06] i see its a microcontroller ... what arch is that on linux? [10:06] asac: sh [10:07] Linux superh 2.6.30-rc2-00079-gb8c193f #1 Thu Apr 16 13:35:14 GMT 2009 sh4a SH7785 SH7785LCR GNU/Linux [10:07] :D [10:23] hmm [10:40] asac: you guys don't do pgo? [10:41] armin76: in karmic we will [10:42] asac: it isn't out already? [10:42] armin76: karmic? i think archive is now open yes. [10:42] didnt do any upload yet thouzgh [10:42] https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ [10:43] all auto importing is running [11:14] i guess im making a chroot :) [11:17] gnomefreak: hi [11:17] gnomefreak: so whats up with sm2 [11:17] you said it still fails? [11:17] do you have the branch somewhere? [11:17] anyone else having problems with shut down? my box wont shut down it stays at halt [11:17] hi asac [11:17] gnomefreak: no shutdown works for me ;) [11:18] asac: its failing on same error as the nss error [11:18] yes. have branch somewhere? [11:18] than it has to be a local issue :( [11:18] asac: not with the latest nss fix [11:18] gnomefreak: show diff you made then [11:21] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/645100 ill be back in a few minutes [11:35] ok badck [11:38] * gnomefreak has to build jaunty chroot before i try to build it again [11:41] gnomefreak: yeah. so this change looks quite ok in general [11:42] well than it shouldnt have failed :( [11:42] i need the complete build log i guess [11:42] im building chroot now i might have time to run it before i leave [11:42] remember to capture that when building next time [11:43] gnomefreak: how about just uploading it to ppa ... you probably have the same tarball already in your ppa? so it would just be diff.gz et al [11:43] asac: i have not found a working way to pipe the builds yeet [11:43] ah good point. if the build failed doesnt that mean tarball is gone? [11:43] gnomefreak: no if you dont delete the package from ppa the tarball will stay [11:44] gnomefreak: just be sure that you build with -S -sd [11:44] ok [11:44] and that you use the same upstream tarball version already uploaded in ppa [11:44] and bump version by appending .1 or .2 or something [11:44] gnomefreak: commit the change you pasted in any case [11:45] asac: i did [11:45] ok its started [11:46] now smoke while i wait [11:51] asac: ok a bit longer, i forgot to get build deps for it :( [11:52] heh [12:11] dtchen: so when i can start pulseaudio at some point during a desktop session, does that mean that pulseaudio crashed? [12:13] this diff is taking forever [12:14] to build [12:15] hmm. isnt seamonkey a tarball in tarball orig? [12:15] thats usually quite fast [12:15] gnomefreak: ? [12:16] no if you mean tarball folder isin top level [12:16] like tb2 used to be [12:16] really [12:16] we should change that then [12:16] we got out of that practice [12:16] we now have the sources in the orig as a tar.bz2 [12:17] is that or is that not the case for sm? [12:17] 2 [12:17] tarball is separate [12:17] hmmm [12:19] yeah it has to be separate othere wise i would see the tarball in toplevel and all i see is debian but i dont remember SM2 ever having it embedded [12:20] ok pushing [12:21] gnomefreak: you have to look in the tarball [12:21] in the orig [12:21] there should be _no_ debian at all [12:21] you probably look at the branch ... but thats without orig sources [12:22] asac: there is a debian after build [12:23] debian and mozilla dir [12:23] thats in seamonkey-2.0 [12:23] -2.0~b1~hg20090423r2462+nobinonly/mozilla [12:23] but i still dont see a tarball or dir named tarball (i dont remember what the dir was called maybe source [12:25] gnomefreak: yeah. ok [12:25] gnomefreak: then its not tarball-in-tarball [12:26] is there a reason why there is a security announcement after we finish the next point release [12:26] asac: assuming you built 3.0.10 [12:27] gnomefreak: not sure i understand that question [12:27] or you havent [12:27] .10 is a security update [12:27] asac: 3.0.10 was released its not in repos but even when they are i still get security announcements from jamie [12:28] gnomefreak: should be in archive [12:28] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0 [12:29] ah it hasnt landed in Karmic from what that link says [12:31] ah thats my fault i think [12:34] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/645103 asac something is wrong here [12:35] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/645104 is my list [12:37] gnomefreak: you dont have jaunty-security and jaunty-updates in your sources.list [12:37] gnomefreak: to to Software Sources dialog and enable security and updates [12:37] did you look at bottom? [12:38] # [12:38] deb http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-updates restricted main multiverse universe [12:38] # [12:38] # [12:38] deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-security restricted main multiverse universe [12:38] i have a better list le tme see if that helps [12:38] gnomefreak: no clue then ;) [12:43] asac: still should have landed for karmic anyway [12:44] ah new list for jaunty now has it [12:44] gnomefreak: xulrunner copied to karmic. firefox uploaded to karmic [12:45] so with some luck those builds will arrive in a day or so [12:45] (builders are swamped with imports) [12:50] yep [12:51] asac: you never released 3.0.9? [12:52] seems 386 in PPA is busy as well [12:55] yeah [12:56] gnomefreak: i didnt release to karmic because i cut a release branch for jaunty one week ago [12:56] or two [12:56] and since karmic wasnt open the build never got ther [12:56] well. karmic automatically has 3.0.9 from jaunty [12:56] but new upload overrides it [12:56] e.g. we added changes to 3.0.9 [12:58] asac: it has 0.8 [12:59] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/645109 [13:12] gnomefreak: [13:12] RELEASE 1.9.1~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 to ubuntu/karmic [13:12] asac@hector:~/ubuntu_bzr/xulrunner-1.9.1.jaunty$ 1.9.1~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [13:13] oops [13:13] gnomefreak: [13:13] + --with-system-nss \ [13:13] + --with-system-nspr \ [13:13] you have to remove those lines [13:13] otherwise the generic check we do below doesnt work [13:13] asac: from SM2? [13:13] gnomefreak: yes from the DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS= in rules [13:13] i thought we wanted to build with nss nspr [13:14] gnomefreak: we do that if possible ... thats what the other change was about [13:14] but you force it, which is wrong [13:14] just drop those two lines and show me diff [13:14] ok doing [13:18] asac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/645111 [13:19] gnomefreak: yes. that works. reupload with that change [13:20] ok trying [13:22] ok i have to get ready to go to eye appointment. I will push this before i leave than when i can i will build latest hg [13:24] why do you have the package flashplugin-installer and flashplugin-nonfree? [13:34] asac: answer that please :) [13:36] ok now im going to go get ready will push when its done [13:52] c0p3rn1c: new name = -installer [13:54] asac: remove -nonfree than since it doessnt install flash [13:54] please even [13:55] SM2 is puhedf [13:56] since we cant remove from <= jaunty than make it install -installer too [13:56] gnomefreak: we have to keep nonfree transitional package until next LTS so that LTS-LTS upgrade is done properly [13:57] well than what do we do about bugs on -nonfree failing to install flash [13:57] transitional package should install -installer and flash but doesnt [14:00] asac: could you make sure that [14:00] gnomefreak: do you have a bug id? [14:00] at least that is why intrepid>ja8unty is broken [14:00] asac: shit load of them bu6t not on hand [14:00] when you upgade from intrepid flash is also installed, I made a bug report for this [14:00] c0p3rn1c: yuours is a dupe orf a master but i dont have it handy [14:00] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144042 [14:00] Launchpad bug 144042 in ubufox "firefox plugin-install says "plugin installed" for non-completed installation" [Medium,Fix released] [14:01] * gnomefreak looked at his bug and told him to join us (if its him) ;) [14:01] c0p3rn1c: it is installed just -insstaller needs to be and isnt [14:02] I know, it's not for me but for the other n ubuntu users who are upgrading from intrepid to jaunty [14:03] c0p3rn1c: the bug number is really low. doesnt look like its an intrepid-jaunty upgrade bug [14:03] asac: should I post a new bug for it, because it has the same result as this bug? [14:04] i might have the master im looking now [14:04] c0p3rn1c: yes. that bug is a different one for sure [14:05] asac: ah ok sorry for the confusion then [14:05] c0p3rn1c: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/144042/comments/30 [14:05] Launchpad bug 144042 in ubufox "firefox plugin-install says "plugin installed" for non-completed installation" [Medium,Fix released] [14:05] asac: as for https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/351355 maybe get ubufox to pop up the license dialog [14:05] Launchpad bug 351355 in flashplugin-nonfree "[MASTER] flashplugin-nonfree installation does not work on jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:06] asac: c0p3rn1c IIRC this is the master of your bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/326609 [14:06] Launchpad bug 326609 in ubufox "[MASTER] No flash in firefox after upgrade from intrepid to jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:07] ok i have to go, maybe when installing or upgrading ubufox should install -installer with -nonfree [14:07] ok im gone [14:07] asac: ok will do [14:08] asac: what logs exactly? [14:10] /var/log/dist-upgrade/ [14:10] i think thats the dir where it is [14:10] term.log [14:10] i think [14:10] c0p3rn1c: ^ [14:10] ok :) [14:11] asac: that dir is empty [14:11] oh wait [14:11] other pc [14:11] sorry lol [14:22] (reconnect) [14:22] 15:21 < asac> c0p3rn1c: so in that term.log you can search for flashplugin-installer ... there should be a wget call that most likely failed for you [14:22] 15:21 < asac> c0p3rn1c: so in that term.log you can search for flashplugin-installer ... there should be a wget call that most likely failed for you [14:22] asac: yes I'm posting it right now at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/326609 [14:22] Launchpad bug 326609 in ubufox "[MASTER] No flash in firefox after upgrade from intrepid to jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:26] asac: ok done, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/326609/comments/26 [14:26] Launchpad bug 326609 in ubufox "[MASTER] No flash in firefox after upgrade from intrepid to jaunty" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:26] c0p3rn1c: ok i posted something there too now [14:26] Jamie alread spotted the output that i suspect to be responsible [14:26] if so its fixed in latest update-manager as i wrote here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/326609/comments/27 [14:28] ok great, then it's fixed! [14:28] I try to upgrade my laptop lateron, so I will check if it's truly fixed. [14:29] will try* [14:31] c0p3rn1c: yes. ensure that you are up-to-date in intrepid before upgrading [14:32] c0p3rn1c: oh wait a sec [14:32] * c0p3rn1c is waiting :) [14:33] c0p3rn1c: ok. verified that the latest intrepid-updates update-manager has that fix [14:33] err jaunty-updates i mean ... but that is considered when upgrading i was told [14:33] c0p3rn1c: would be cool to get a verify from you that this works [14:34] asac: I will try it tonight, it will take me some hours to back-up my stuff [14:36] asac: yeah but the thing is I currently do have ubuntu intrepid, but some special version(ubuntu ultimate edition) I do use the official ubuntu repositories though [14:36] c0p3rn1c: what is ultimate edition? [14:36] some "distro" I decided to try out :) [14:37] c0p3rn1c: anyway. so in jaunty you can just run apt-get install --reinstall flashplugin-installer [14:37] c0p3rn1c: i guessed that. what is their focus? [14:37] asac: true [14:37] (besides the nebulous name ;)) [14:37] asac: to me it seems to be nothing more than a ubuntu application pack [14:38] c0p3rn1c: third party apps? [14:38] or just a special set of default apps? [14:38] yes and maybe some third party apps [14:39] well. if they didnt repack flashplugin or update-manager this shouldnt matter i hope [14:39] with some luck the upgrade will bring you back to mainline ;) [14:39] not sure I only switched to using ubuntu a half year ago [14:40] asac: yeah I think it won't be a problem too [14:41] I know it's off-topic but there is one thing I hate about ubuntu ultimate edition, I don't have multiple consoles( CTRL-ALT-F[1-8] ) [14:43] oh wait I just found out I do , prbly because my keyboard settings where wrong [14:43] n/m then lol [14:46] brb [15:17] cool. gnomefreaks seamonkey build worked ;) ... finally [15:35] hjmf: btw, the release dust is settling ... so if you need something from me ... shoot. [16:51] * armin76 shoots asac [16:51] * asac hugs armin76 :-P [18:54] hjmf: btw, the release dust is settling ... so if you need something from me ... shoot. [18:55] asac: OK, not at this moment but for sure I will do it :-) [18:55] great [19:20] asac: you going to UDS? [19:28] armin76: obviously ;) [19:29] i think i cannot escape that :) [19:30] asac: its where i live, i may shoot you in person :D [19:33] armin76: you live in barcelona? [19:33] i think i envy you ;) [19:33] yup [19:33] definitly drop by ... there is always much much fun [19:34] and UDS is supposed to be in the city centre even [19:35] i'll go if canonical gives me an arm board :P [19:37] hrm, its pretty close where i work [19:38] armin76: actually i think there might be potential ... not sure, but i heard that also community folks are supposed to get such devices if they are actively porting stuff :) [19:45] asac: so what do you there apart from saying all the time that ubuntu rocks? :P [19:45] armin76: beer ;) [19:45] hrm...not interested [19:46] just visit and see yourself [19:46] hard to describe [19:46] its basically a bunch of sessions where we discuss goals and details on what shoujld be done in karmic [19:46] which days are you going? [19:46] all 5 [19:47] i will keep you posted on schedule so you can pick a day where there are interesting sessions [19:47] okay :) [19:49] asac: also if you need any help wrt city, just poke me [19:50] armin76: above, you already denied to help me with going out for beer et al :( [19:50] j.k. [19:50] haha [19:50] i think i will arrive on sat ... monday UDS starts [19:51] armin76: fta will be ther too [20:05] ok enough for today. cu later or tomorrow [20:13] asac: thanks it built :) i still cant really see so i have the size of page is huge [20:32] since i cant see today is perfect to grab latest build and build it. if it fails i dont need to read it today :) [21:24] guud evening [21:24] asac: how are you gauging "start"? `pgrep pulseaudio'? [21:25] how is fta doing? haven't seen him in a while [21:25] hi dtchen [21:25] asac: start-pulseaudio-x11 returns 0 even if pulseaudio is already running [21:25] hi BUGabundo [22:36] Hi [22:40] yamo: hi [22:42] I'm using the Seamonkey 2.0b1pre from gnomefreak it's working great just has some bugs [23:28] am i the only one who notices the speed difference between FF on linux and windows, the latter being faster === mconnor_ is now known as mconnor