/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/04/30/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

clearscreenfirefox 3.0.10-nobinonly on the karmic repositories returns with "bus error", gdb reports that /usr/bin/firefox is not in valid executable format. Is this a known bug? What additional information can I provide?01:49
BUGabundoclearscreen: we are all a sleep in here at this time :)01:50
clearscreenWhat?! :P it's just 2:50:00 AM!01:50
BUGabundoThu Apr 30 01:53:46 WEST 200901:53
BUGabundoclearscreen: ping asac on it... fta is MIA01:54
BUGabundoasac: http://www.macno.org/denticator.php?user=asac&weekchart=bar&daychart=bar02:01
clearscreendisregard my previous stupidity, bash file in gdb? heh yeah.02:22
asacclearscreen: ?10:08
asacrestart your system10:08
asacdtchen: just run pulseaudio on the console10:09
clearscreenasac: I did restart it, I'll try again.. hold on10:12
clearscreenalright, brb10:15
clearscreenasac: same error, hold on.. trying to pastebin gdb output through links10:18
clearscreenasac: http://pastebin.com/m145d7c61 this _should_ work10:21
asacbus error is strange10:21
asacusually hardware issues on x86 architecture i would think10:22
asacclearscreen: thats normal. run firefox -g10:22
asacto start ffox in debugger10:22
clearscreenI did, it's in the pastebin10:22
asacclearscreen: thats on jaunty?10:23
clearscreenasac: karmic repo, I'm not sure if 3.0.10 is even in jaunty repo yet :P10:23
asacclearscreen: well10:23
asacclearscreen: thats the problem then10:24
asacclearscreen: jaunty is definitly available10:24
asac(even before karmic was)10:24
asacclearscreen: so you upgraded to karmic completely? or just ffox?10:25
clearscreenI dont mind stuff breaking, that's why I switched to karmic repositories (feature freeze on jaunty), the thing is that precompiled firefox binaries from the official website work, and they appear to be broken here10:25
clearscreenjust trying to help it get fixed :)10:26
asacyeah10:26
asacsounds like a toolchain issue10:26
asacclearscreen: can you try to respin xulrunner-1.9 locally?10:26
clearscreenasac: completely, although I think it broke after the recent libc6 upgrade10:26
clearscreenwasnt a problem with newer binutils10:26
asacclearscreen: yeah there are often toolchain issues right after archive opens. try to respin firefox-3.0 then ;)10:27
asacdo you know how to do it?10:27
clearscreenasac: I'll probably sound like a total noob, but I have no idea what the word respin is supposed to mean :D10:28
asacclearscreen: sudo apt-get install build-essential; sudo apt-get build-dep firefox-3.0; apt-get source firefox-3.0; cd firefox-3.0*/;10:29
asacdpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot10:29
asacyou might need to install fakeroot package10:29
clearscreenalready have both those package10:29
clearscreenlets see10:29
clearscreenpackages*10:29
asacsudo apt-get build-dep firefox-3.010:30
asac-> thats not a package10:30
asacbut a complete set of packages ;)10:30
clearscreenyeah I was refering to the build-essential metapackage and fakeroot :p10:30
asackk10:30
clearscreenthe thing I dont understand is it working with precompiled binaries from the official website, but I guess I'm not too familiar with the arch to make any guesses about that :)10:31
asacJazzva: would you be interested in helping keeping the daily builds not fail ;)? https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/10:32
asacusually its just adjusting patches10:32
asacso they apply cleanly again - or dropping patches that were applied upstream :)10:32
clearscreenWas that aimed at me or Jazzva?10:33
asacat Jazzva ;)10:33
asacclearscreen: not saying you are not invited to do so ;)10:33
clearscreenI'd be willing to, but probably far from knowledgable enough to actually do it10:34
asacheh10:34
asacclearscreen: for now "respin" firefox-3.0. thats a good start :)10:35
clearscreencd: 11900: can't cd to /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-10:35
clearscreenconfigure: error: /sdk/include/xpcom-config.h doesn't exist10:35
asacclearscreen: you didnt install the build-dep10:35
clearscreenI did :)10:35
asacfirefox-3.010:35
asacclearscreen: dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9-dev10:35
clearscreendaniel@ubuntu:~/firefox-3.0-3.0.10+nobinonly$ sudo apt-get build-dep firefox-3.010:35
clearscreenReading package lists... Done10:35
clearscreenBuilding dependency tree10:35
clearscreenReading state information... Done10:35
clearscreen0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded10:35
clearscreenexcuse my lack of usage of pastebin, it's a pain in the ass with a console browser10:36
asacclearscreen: apt-get install pastebinit10:36
asacecho hall | pastebinit10:36
asac;)10:36
asacanyway10:36
clearscreencool :)10:36
asacclearscreen: run dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9-dev above10:36
asacdoes that do anything?10:37
clearscreenasac: plenty of output10:37
clearscreenhttp://pastebin.com/f4851a4ca10:37
asacclearscreen: so how does firefox-3.0 fail to build?10:38
asaci need more context10:38
asacthat issue looks to strange10:38
clearscreenlet me give you a full log10:38
asacits really hard to get firefox-3.0 fail to build nowadays ;)10:39
asacits just tiny and usually wouldnt fail even if you tried ;)10:39
clearscreenhttp://pastebin.com/feaab4d710:39
asacthats not complete :)10:39
asacmaybe pastebin.com has a upper bound10:40
asacyou can try paste.ubuntu.com10:40
clearscreenI'll try10:40
asacclearscreen: http://paste.ubuntu.com/161278/10:40
asacthats i have in $HOME/.pastebinit.xml10:40
clearscreenasac: mmmmpf, should I clean up somehow between building? seems to fail a lot more quickly now (doesnt even get to configure)10:43
clearscreennevermind10:43
asacremove it ... apt-get source  it again10:43
clearscreenwas in wrong directory10:43
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161284/10:44
asacheh10:44
asacits still not complete10:44
asacthere is no error10:44
clearscreenI'm just piping to pastebinit :P10:44
asacthats a bad idea i guee10:45
clearscreenI'll try to c/p it through links10:45
asacjust copy the last 100 lines to a file and cat thatfile | pastebinit10:45
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/16128610:46
clearscreenthere.10:46
asacls -ld /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel*10:48
asacand also10:48
asacls -ld /usr/lib/xulrunner-*10:48
asacor only the last ;)10:48
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161288/10:48
asacurgh10:48
asacxulrunner-1.9 --gre-version10:49
clearscreenbus error :)10:49
asacheh10:50
asacok10:50
asacso you need to rebuild xulrunner-1.910:50
asacsame way10:50
asac;)10:50
clearscreenalright, lets see10:50
asacapt-get build-dep xulrunner-1.910:51
asacbefore running the build10:51
clearscreenyeah10:51
asacalso to safe time use dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b10:51
clearscreenk, that failed pretty quickly :D sec10:52
clearscreendisregard that10:54
asac;)10:55
clearscreensilly me, grabbing source through sudo10:55
asacouch10:55
clearscreenshould've figured it was gonna take a while, with a 40MB compressed package with source :)11:00
asacclearscreen: yeah. usually 20-50 minutes build11:19
clearscreenasac: after a ~35min build: dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2.... too much output before that, but I'll try to give ~50 lines or so before fail11:29
clearscreenasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/161317/11:30
asache ok11:32
asacthats a build failure because of new gcc11:32
asaclet me check11:32
asacclearscreen: so download http://paste.ubuntu.com/161320/11:35
asacand in top level dir of xul11:36
asacpatch -p1 < /tmp/fileyoudownloaded11:36
clearscreenalright, hold on11:36
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161320/plain/11:36
asacdownload that ;)11:36
clearscreendone. rebuild time?11:38
clearscreenasac: highlighting :)11:38
asacclearscreen: did you apply to the same tree where the build failed?11:38
clearscreenapplied to top level dir of xul, like you said :D11:39
asacclearscreen: right. but did you keep the build that failed?11:39
asacyou can just continue to build it if thats the case11:39
asacotherwise building time11:39
clearscreenasac: I re-ran the dpkg-build command, and that seemed to have cleaned all the object files.. so yeah, rebuild time11:40
clearscreenlearning the harsh way :(11:40
asacheh11:40
asacyeah11:40
asacthats ok11:40
asacits just that mozilla builds usually take long and always clean building to try something wastes a lot of time ;)11:40
* asac sent out a call for help aout daily archive on identi.ca ;)11:42
clearscreenalright, it's building now.. guess I have some time to do some groceries11:43
asac Bug 47884311:45
asac11:45
asacmozilla Bug 47884311:45
ubottuError: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/478843/+text)11:45
ubottuMozilla bug 478843 in Startup and Profile System "/toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp:1424:6: error: #elif with no expression" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47884311:45
Jazzvaasac: I can try. Is it too much time-consuming?11:51
asacJazzva: no ;)11:52
asacJazzva: there are two ways to approach this. one is really unconsuming:11:52
asac1. when daily build fails, check if its a patch that doesnt apply .... then just make that patch apply and commit .... wait if next daily build works11:53
asac2. same as 1. but try to build before committing (takes a bit more time obviously :))11:53
asacmight take two or more days to fix it with 1. but it doesnt take too much time ;)11:54
asacif patches fail regularly we should really consider to upstream them or drop them (not that we shouldnt look hard at all patches anyway)11:54
Jazzvaasac: I guess I can try, then :) (have to finish two school projects by 10th May, that's the reason I asked if it's time-consuming)11:54
asacheh11:55
asacok.11:55
asacno hurry11:55
asacfor now i can cope with it11:55
asacbut those are regular failures, so having more than me and fta look at those would be helpful11:55
asacits not time consuming, but frequent. balancing the load helps to make it easy11:55
Jazzvaasac: Ok. Could you just give me instructions how to do it (where are the branches and similar)?11:56
asacso the ppa is https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa11:57
asaci fixed all branches yesterday ... except for thunderbird and prism11:57
asacbut thunderbird is a good example to show:11:57
asacit fails to apply a pango patch (which was fixed upstream, so can be dropped)11:57
asacso the procedure is: branch the proper .head branch (e.g. mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head i guess)11:58
asacbump current changelog version (if its UNRELEASED) to the most recently failed on in ppa11:58
asacso just copy the upstream version strings there11:59
asacand commit that with a "New snapshot ..." commit (look at bzr log for examples)11:59
asacyou can download the orgi.tar.gz from ppa to the tarballs/ dir used for bzr builddeb11:59
asacthen you just fix the patch11:59
asacand commit that to head11:59
asacnext daily will pick that up12:00
asacso in this case its branching tbird ... bumping changelog, dropping patch ... done12:00
asacto be sure that there are no other patches failing start a build and see if it gets over the patch stage12:00
asacbut usually its one or two patches12:01
Jazzvaasac: Ok, understood...12:01
clearscreenasac: it seems to have succeeded :)12:19
clearscreendpkg-deb: building package `xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support' in `../xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support_1.9.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_i386.deb'.12:19
clearscreenetcetera12:19
clearscreenShould I install them myself with dpkg? Do i need to remove old packages first? In other words: what do I do next :)12:22
asacclearscreen: yes12:23
asacclearscreen: just install all .deb fiels produced12:23
asacthen try to run xulrunner-1.9 --gre-version12:24
clearscreenwould 'dpkg -i *.deb' be good enough?12:24
asacy12:24
clearscreensudo*12:24
asacy12:24
clearscreendaniel@ubuntu:~$ xulrunner-1.9 --gre-version12:24
clearscreen1.9.0.1012:24
asacgood12:25
clearscreenand firefox is working again, cool12:25
asacso firefox might even just work12:25
clearscreenyup12:25
asacodd12:25
asacthats i386?12:25
asacamd64 is confirmed to work with our archive binaries12:25
asacanyway. let me just upload the build failure fix then12:25
clearscreenyup i38612:25
clearscreenasac: alright12:26
* sebner waves at asac :)12:27
* asac waves at sebner 12:27
asac;)12:27
sebnerasac: how is life going in fox's world?12:28
clearscreenasac: will you need my deb files or can I trash it all :)12:28
asacyou can trash all12:29
asacsebner: always too much to do ;)12:29
sebnerheh12:29
asacfirefox 3.5 b4 is out ;)12:31
asacclearscreen: uploaded to karmic. thanks12:32
clearscreenasac: you're welcome12:32
asacwill take a bit: buildqueue: 2343 builds waiting in queue12:33
asaci38612:33
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/builders/12:33
clearscreenasac: what should I do when trying to install deb packages that depend on xulrunner-1.9?12:49
clearscreen moonlight-plugin-mozilla depends on xulrunner-1.9 | xulrunner-1.9.1; however:12:49
clearscreen  Package xulrunner-1.9 is not configured yet.12:49
clearscreeninstall deb packages = install packages through apt**12:49
clearscreenI suppose I should just apt-get upgrade since you've added updated version of xulrunner to the repo12:51
asacclearscreen: you isntalled all with dpkg -i *.deb12:53
asacso xulrunner-1.9 should be installed12:53
clearscreenasac: well im trying to install moonling-plugin-mozilla but getting dependency errors12:53
clearscreen  Package xulrunner-1.9 is not configured yet.12:54
clearscreen  Package xulrunner-1.9.1 is not installed.12:54
asacsudo dpkg --configure -a12:54
asacor sudo apt-get install -f12:54
asacbut dont just hit y12:54
clearscreensame errors12:54
asacinstall -f12:55
clearscreensame12:55
asacwithout package12:55
asac^^12:55
asacremove moonlight again12:55
asacyou have to finish the xulrunner install12:55
asacwhich isnt configured yet12:55
clearscreensame thing after moonlight removal :P12:56
asacwell. as i said12:56
asacyour dpkg -i *.deb failed12:56
asacnot sure why, you should have seen a failure12:56
asacnow you have to remove packages that cause conflict12:56
asacalso you cannot get the same issue after moonlight removal12:56
asacbecause the error refers to moonlight12:56
clearscreenwell after removal, it's a similar error with a different package12:57
clearscreen xulrunner-1.9-dev depends on xulrunner-1.9 (>= 1.9.0.10+nobinonly); however:12:57
clearscreen  Package xulrunner-1.9 is not configured yet.12:57
asacyes12:57
asacbut its installed. you you need to finish configure12:57
asacor remove whatever package makes this not configure12:57
asacyou definitly had an error when installing the .debs initially12:58
asachaving that would help12:58
clearscreenI cant recall seeing an error and i closed that window a long time ago :P12:58
asacyeah. but it errored12:58
asacotherwise you wouldnt have this problem now12:58
clearscreenbut.. since you've added an updated xulrunner to repo, should I just be able to remove & upgrade/install?12:59
asacCOLUMNS=200 dpkg -l xulrunner*12:59
asacclearscreen: will take days to build12:59
asacas i wrote above12:59
clearscreenah, soz12:59
asacthere are 2500 builds waiting12:59
asacyou have to resolve this manually12:59
asacyou also shouldnt have removed .debs12:59
clearscreenaha ok12:59
asacthats always a bad idea ;)12:59
clearscreenYou told me to! :D13:00
asacis not worth the space saving13:00
asacno13:00
asaci never told you to13:00
asacyou asked if you can remove them after installing13:00
clearscreenWell, yeah I guess13:00
asacso you wanted to have them remove ... whihc i just answered with yes13:00
asacbut i didnt know your install failed ;)13:00
asacso post the output above13:01
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161389/13:01
clearscreenbut yeah, learning the hard way :)13:01
asacclearscreen: so dpkg --configure -a gives the error above?13:02
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161393/13:03
clearscreenerm13:03
clearscreenhold on13:03
asacthat looks not that bad13:03
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161394/13:03
clearscreenasac: I wish it was only doing that :)13:03
asac/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/xulrunner13:04
asacwhats in there?13:04
clearscreennothing13:05
asacdoes that file existß13:05
asac?13:05
clearscreenyes13:05
clearscreenempty, though13:05
asactry remove it and run again13:05
clearscreenthat worked.13:05
asacso yeah13:05
asacnow run apt-get update upgrade13:05
asacand if that works install moonlight13:06
clearscreenyup, thanks :)13:06
asacwhat is in that file now?13:06
clearscreenhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/161397/13:06
asacguess that file got corrupted on last upgrade when there was a bus error still13:06
asacyeah thats ok13:06
clearscreenok cool13:07
asacso xulrunner 1.9 will take a bit longer13:19
asacfailed because of xcb-util transition as it seems13:19
Jazzvaasac: mind if I try to fix thunderbird build fail now?14:40
=== jtv1 is now known as jtv
=== rickspencer3 is now known as rickspencer3-afk
=== rickspencer3-afk is now known as rickspencer3
asacJazzva: sure15:04
asacgo ahead15:04
asac[reed]: where send our new translation coordinator to to talk to mozilla folks15:23
asac[reed]: is that #i18n?15:23
[reed]#l10n15:23
[reed]on moznet15:23
[reed]Specifically, Pike, stas, gandalf, and sethb15:23
asac[reed]: great15:26
Jazzvaasac: I've downloaded the .orig.tar.gz, and after I run bzr builddeb it seems not to extract it to build area, and because of that quilt complains it can't find a file that needs to be patched. any idea what I'm doing wrong?16:08
asacJazzva: well ... usually you link the patches dir to the top level mozilla/ dir16:17
asacand then do quilt push16:17
asacin this case its just dropping the patch as upstream fixed it16:17
asacquilt push -f16:17
asac(to get reject files to fix and afterwards run quilt refresh)16:17
Jazzvaasac: and if I want to do a test build?16:17
asacbut yeah in this case you see that the push fails and then quilt delete that patch and quilt push -a16:17
asacJazzva: just do a build after dropping the patch then16:18
asacor isnt that the question16:18
asacyou need to run bzr bd --merge --dont-purge16:18
Jazzvaasac: the problem is that I don't have anything in the mozilla/ dir, which should contain the source. How do I get bzr builddeb to extract .orig.tar.gz and then try to apply patches?16:18
asac(--merge is important)16:18
Jazzvaasac: Ok, I'll try16:19
asacJazzva: i usually run bzr bd --merge --dont-purge16:19
asacand abort after patches are applied16:19
asacthen go to the build tree and work there16:19
asacwhen finished copy the patches and whatelse i modified to the bzr tree16:19
asacand commit that16:19
Jazzvaasac: yeah, I missed the --merge part. Ok, seems it's working now. I dropped the patch, so I'll just let builddeb finish16:20
asacJazzva: better commit before ;) ... in case it doesnt work you can still connect16:21
asacthe daily run is in about 1.5 hours ;)16:21
asace.g. 190016:21
Jazzvaah... ok16:21
asacmight be that its UTC16:21
asacwe should at least try to commit before the next run ;)16:21
Jazzvaasac: pushed to lp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head16:23
asacgreat16:24
asacJazzva: did you bump the changelog version to the current date?16:25
asac(obviously ... otherwise it would fail to bzr bd)16:25
asacJazzva: hmm. i think you should have kept fta as maintainer16:26
asacJazzva: err as changelog owner16:26
asacat least his bots signs with his key16:26
asacnot sure if it will fail now ;)16:26
asacFabien Tassin <fta@ubuntu.com>16:27
asacconsider to keep him in there ,)16:27
asacwe could also try what happens now ;)16:27
asacmaybe he runs dch -r before uploading anyway16:28
Jazzvaah... ok, sorry16:30
asacno worry. we can also see if it works ;)16:30
asacwhatever you prefer16:30
JazzvaI can push another commit with fta as maintainer, if you want to be safe :)16:30
Jazzvaasac: I'll take a look at prism later16:31
asacgreat16:32
asacJazzva: prism is a bit unobvious to me16:32
asacmaybe its a simple fix16:33
Jazzvaasac: I'll see if I can find out what's wrong :)16:33
asaccould be that the orig tarball doesnt contain all files16:33
asaccreating prism/components/Makefile16:33
asacmake[4]: *** No rule to make target `common/Makefile.in', needed by `common/Makefile'.  Stop.16:33
asacmaybe just trunk is broken16:35
asacJazzva: so maybe top level Makefile.in needs common removed from DIRS16:39
asacthere is nothing in that dir anymore16:39
Jazzvaasac: ok, I'll check. I still haven't downloaded yet, will do it after lunch16:40
BUGabundobom dia17:02
asachi BUGabundo17:13
* asac out for some more errands17:20
armin76[reed]: mozilla bug 330626 checkin checkin17:50
armin76!17:50
ubottuMozilla bug 330626 in Build "coreconf/Linux.mk does not detect mips64" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33062617:51
* armin76 sees younger asac in that bug17:51
armin76when he cared about weird arches! :D17:51
Jazzvaasac: looks like removing "common" from DIRS in prism's Makefile did work...17:54
asacJazzva: yeah cool. so do a patch for that. commit it (if thats quick it might catch todays run)17:58
asacJazzva: and send it upstream17:58
asaclet me check if he is online now ;)17:58
Jazzvaok17:59
asacso he isnt. seems we need to file a bug then ;)17:59
asacbut for now add that as a patch to the branch (just against Makefile.in)17:59
asaccool. assuming that the daily runs in 60 minutes17:59
asacwe might have all green today again \o/17:59
asacwell. except hardy prism ... which doesnt build because we dont have a build system in there18:00
Jazzvaasac: just to check, ~mozillateam/prism/prism is main dev branch for prism?18:08
Jazzvaasac: pushed18:10
Jazzvalet's see if it will work :)18:10
asaci think thats the right branch. yes18:13
asacyes. at least its the one i know of18:13
asacJazzva: can you file that as a bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mozilla+Labs&component=Prism18:14
asactell them ubuntu dailies failed18:14
asacand that this seems to be the problem18:14
asacbut maybe wait till the build worked ,)18:14
Jazzvaok, I will :)18:15
asacJazzva: good. so the builds are queued. lets see if all go green!19:22
asac;)19:22
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa19:22
Jazzvaasac: noticed.. also noticed "build expected in >10 hours" :)19:39
asacheh19:39
asacwell at least xul 1.9.2 in jaunty/lpia is currently building ;)19:39
asacwill give us a first stab on whether it broke again ;)19:39
asacseems like everbody being frustrated by huge builder backlog in real archive going for ppas ;)19:40
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/builders/19:40
asaci386      2201 builds waiting in queue19:40
asacbut hey19:40
asaci uploaded xul 1.9 30 minutes ago and its already building ;)19:40
Jazzvawhoa... that's a lot :)19:40
asaceven on i38619:40
asacmaybe all the others waiting are universe?19:40
Jazzvahmm... though only ~220 foor PPA19:40
Jazzvas/foor/for19:40
asacnot sure, but i think universe gtes a lower build score to start19:41
asacwell. 200 is quite a lot still19:41
asacespecially when kernels are build ;)19:41
asacwhich happens quite often19:41
asacor xulrunner ;)19:41
Jazzvaheh :)19:41
asacguess the long weekend will help a bit ;)19:43
asactoo bad. i didnt really care the last week, but now that i see the builds sitting there i feel desparate to get the latest tbird 3 daily ;) ... mine is 8 days old19:46
Jazzvaasac: heh... I tried TB3, but I gave up on it :).19:48
[reed]armin76: that's under NSS, no?19:57
[reed]NSS is highly restricted19:57
[reed]only like 6 people who can check-in stuff19:57
armin76[reed]: oh, didn't know20:00
asacJazzva: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35796520:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 357965 in nspluginwrapper "package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 139 zurück" [Undecided,Incomplete]20:19
asacnspluginwrapper postinst crashes when there is the gcu plugin installed20:19
asacmaybe its an easy fix ... maybe we need to conflict on it20:19
asacmaybe its a bug in gcu plugin ... what business does that have with nspluginwrapper in any case?20:19
Jazzvaasac: I don't know what gcu plugin is?20:20
Jazzvaasac: I'll try to reproduce now20:21
asacbug 35796520:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 357965 in nspluginwrapper "package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 139 zurück" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35796520:21
asacretitled ;)20:21
asachmm20:21
asacretitled ;)20:21
asacbug 35796520:21
Jazzvaasac: btw, there is npw 1.3.0, I will prepare it for karmic in the next few days20:22
asacJazzva: hmm. isnt that an unstable branch?20:22
asacas far as i understood gwenole its an alpha release20:22
Jazzvaasac: just as 1.2.2 was before during jaunty :)20:22
asacyou sure=20:23
asac?20:23
Jazzvaasac: 1.3.0 is also in debian/unstable, I saw that on MoM20:23
asaci really thought 1.3.0 was a complete trashy release20:23
asachmm20:23
asacwe can check20:23
asacif its better we can take it20:23
Jazzvaasac: I'm fairly sure we packaged development snapshots during jaunty20:23
asacbut we should check back with gwenole ... i think we had lots of issues with 1.1 at some point ;)20:23
Jazzvaasac: but I didn't try 1.3.0 yet. Of course, no need to hurry if it's a trashy release20:23
asachardy?20:23
JazzvaI can't remember...20:24
asac1.1.2-0ubuntu120:24
asacintrepid20:24
asacso i think that was the worst ever ... ;)20:24
Jazzvabut I think there was a period with fairly constant package updates... perhaps it was 1.1.0, then 1.1.220:24
asacit was the alpha release we had to take in order to get windowless support20:24
Jazzvagood memory :)20:24
asacheh. well. 1.1.0 was the worst ever ;)20:25
Jazzvaasac: hmm, I can reproduce the bug too20:29
Jazzvaasac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/357965/comments/620:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 357965 in nspluginwrapper "package nspluginwrapper 1.2.2-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 139 zurück" [Undecided,Incomplete]20:29
asacJazzva: can you install -dbgsym and run that under gdb?20:31
asacan20:31
asacah20:31
Jazzvaok20:32
asacso he claims dupe of bug 23715620:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 237156 in libselinux "SETRANS + libavg = SIGSEGV on Hardy" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23715620:33
Jazzvaasac: seems to crash in the same function20:33
=== rickspencer3 is now known as rickspencer3-afk
Jazzvaasac: only gcu-plugin has a dbgsym package, gdb doesn't provide anything useful (or I'm not running it correctly)20:39
c0p3rn1casac: I just upgraded to jaunty, and I can confirm that flash works without any hassle21:38
c0p3rn1cstill low performance though :(21:38
c0p3rn1cnow I have to install the beta manual again21:39
c0p3rn1cmanually*21:40
=== rickspencer3-afk is now known as rickspencer3
BUGabundoboa noite23:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!