/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/05/03/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

LaserJockanybody have a fresh Jaunty VM laying around?01:30
LaserJockI need somebody to install gcompris (a bit of a download) and see if it segfaults01:32
hggdhserver or desktop?01:51
LaserJockdesktop01:51
hggdhsorry... only desktop I have is the real mccoy01:51
LaserJockwell, that'd work to if you wouldn't mind01:52
hggdhk01:52
LaserJockit just seems like I'm the only one not experiencing this bug01:52
hggdhfrom the standard repos?01:52
LaserJockyeah01:53
LaserJockjust install gcompris01:54
hggdhjust gcompris, -data *-sound?01:54
LaserJockand then run gcompris from a terminal01:54
LaserJockyeah01:54
LaserJockand all I need is if it segfaults or not at startup01:54
hggdhjust 45M download, should take a few seconds01:54
* andol also does an apt-get install gcompris...01:54
andolIf the computer crashes, I'll take it as a sign of it being bed time :)01:54
hggdhheh01:55
hggdhk, will run now01:55
hggdhno sigseg01:56
andolLaserJock: For me gcompris starts without any problems. Anything you want me to test inside the application?01:56
LaserJockhggdh: oh, I need to know if you have python-numeric installed01:56
LaserJockandol: same for you ^^01:56
hggdhLaserJock, it is installed01:57
LaserJockhggdh: hmmpf01:57
hggdhheh01:57
LaserJockthe segfault is supposed to happen when python-numeric is *not* installed01:57
hggdhah, OK. Let me see if I can take it out01:57
andolLaserJock: no python-numeric for me.01:58
* andol is running i386, if that matters.01:58
hggdher, my default is python301:58
hggdhcoredump, Laserjock. Running on amd6402:00
LaserJockohhhhh02:00
LaserJockhow interesting02:00
LaserJockand all you did was remove python-numeric?02:00
hggdhException ImportError: 'No module named Numeric' in 'garbage collection' ignored02:00
hggdhFatal Python error: unexpected exception during garbage collection02:00
hggdhAborted (core dumped)02:00
hggdhyes02:00
LaserJockok, yeah, that's the right error02:00
LaserJockok, well I'm i386 too02:00
hggdhso garbage-collection needs -numeric02:01
LaserJockI have no idea why this would be arch-dependent02:01
hggdhon amd64??02:01
hggdhthat is really weird02:01
hggdhso... let me reinstall -numeric and try again, just to be sure02:02
LaserJockk02:02
porthoseLaserJock: I'm on i386 and I get  the same error as hggdh no numeric module02:03
LaserJockoh great02:03
LaserJockthanks for blowing my theory out of the water :-002:03
hggdhyay, with -numeric no error02:03
hggdhLaserJock, definitely needs -numeric here02:04
LaserJockok, so hggdh and porthose get core dump, andol and I don't02:04
hggdhmy default python is 2.6.202:05
LaserJocksame here02:05
hggdhnow this is even more misterious02:05
LaserJockwhat's strange is02:05
LaserJockI can go to the gcompris module that's bailing02:06
LaserJockand if I try to load the module it'll bail02:06
LaserJockbut that doesn't seem to affect gcompris starting02:06
hggdhout of curiosity, let me remove python302:07
hggdhnah, coredumped also. So it has nothing to do with having python3 installed02:10
LaserJockI'm not sure if its python or not02:11
LaserJockor perhaps it's higher in gcompris02:11
LaserJockthe problem is that we both can't load the same module02:11
LaserJockit's just that for me that doesn't stop gcompris from starting02:12
LaserJockbut for you it causes a core dump02:12
hggdhsome sort of python setting? Global?02:12
porthoseLaserJock: http://pastebin.com/d7401247302:13
james_wwhere does it load Numeric in that module?02:14
james_wis it conditional?02:14
LaserJockit's not conditional02:16
LaserJockit's in /usr/share/gcompris/python/DTW/dtw.py02:17
LaserJockjust does a straight, from Numeric import *02:17
james_wcan you pastebin the file please?02:19
LaserJockjames_w: http://pastebin.com/d26486bf302:23
james_wnothing obvious there02:24
james_wwhy's it trying to load this module at garbage collection time?02:24
james_wdoesn't look to be anything in there you would want to use02:25
james_wit may be that garbage collection and loading this module just collide due to something weird this package does, but I wouldn't expect it to always be the same place that it dies02:26
LaserJockjames_w: yeah, I've got about 6 people who get the same exact error02:28
LaserJockwell poo02:37
LaserJockI don't know why this is happening02:37
LaserJockand unfortunately it's happening to upstream and he's not so happy that it's happening in a stable release02:38
micahgDoes Hardy have apport as a service in it?03:50
LaserJockmicahg: yes, but you might have to enable it03:59
micahgok03:59
micahgso I can tell someone /etc/init.d/apport start?03:59
LaserJockmicahg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport#How%20to%20enable%20apport04:00
micahgLaserJock: thanks, that's what I needed04:02
jklowdenIs this a good place to ask where and how I should report what I think is a WUBI bug?04:33
pace_t_zulujklowden: you found the right place04:34
hggdhjklowden, see the title of the channel ;-)04:35
pace_t_zuluare you familiar w/ http://www.launchpad.net ?04:35
pace_t_zulujklowden: are you familiar w/ http://www.launchpad.net04:36
pace_t_zuluhggdh: we have another shoot and run04:39
jklowdenI haven't been to launchpad.net.  I found a couple of related messages on ubuntuforums.org, and a message <somewhere> saying it's "better" to report bugs directly, or something.04:39
jklowdenThe deal is that wubi-9.04-rev128.log contained misleading messages about permission being denied.  In fact the problem was a read(2) error; the CD was borked.04:40
hggdhheh04:45
pace_t_zulujklowden: http://www.launchpad.net is where bugs are reported, triaged, and fixed04:46
pace_t_zulu!launchpad04:46
ubot4`Launchpad is a collection of development services for Open Source projects. It's Ubuntu's bug tracker, and much more; see https://launchpad.net/04:46
hggdhjklowden, indeed, if there is no bug opened on a problem, this problem will have a good chance of keeping on bothering others04:47
jklowdenOK, no problem, thanks.  I just checked.  "wubi permission denied" turned up nothing.  I started to register.  Would you happen to know what address I should add to my greylist filter?  I don't see any mail from "launchpad".04:49
jklowdenbounces@canonical.com, perhaps?04:51
hggdhjklowden, give me a min04:52
hggdhhum. It will be a bit more difficult... each email that comes from your bug will carry the email address of the commenter04:53
hggdhbut -- the reply-to field will have an email address ending on '@bugs.launchpad.net'04:54
jklowden(That's OK.  The greylister just requires the sending SMTP engine to behave itself.  It will slow things down a bit, that's all.)04:55
micahgCan someone set bug 355476 to wishlist?05:48
ubot4`Launchpad bug 355476 in firefox "32-bit firefox should be included in AMD64 (x86-64) distribution" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35547605:48
hggdhmicahg, ugh05:53
micahgugh?05:54
micahgI don't like it either05:54
hggdhyeah05:54
micahgbut, rather I figure everyone's entitled to make their requests, right?05:54
hggdhI agree05:55
hggdhdone05:56
micahgthanks05:56
micahgI already commented that the discussion should happen on brainstorm.ubuntu05:56
micahgoh, here's what I was going to ask05:56
hggdhbut it is a horrible idea... even though nsplugin suck05:56
micahgwhy aren't swfdec, gnash, and flashplayer marked as conflicts with each other?05:57
hggdhyes, I saw the brainstorm suggestion. Good move05:57
micahgI just followed the triage response list :)05:57
* hggdh knows05:57
micahgtake a look at bug 36068105:58
ubot4`Launchpad bug 360681 in firefox "after firefox upgrade flash does not work untill   flashplugin-nonfree . [ubuntu 8.10] firefox flash hangs swfdec_video_decoder_errorv no suitable decoder for video codec 7 " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36068105:58
hggdhdo you run intrepid?05:59
micahgnot anymroe05:59
hggdhsame here05:59
micahgwhat were you going to have mem check?06:00
micahg*me06:00
micahgI'm gonna mark the bug as user fixed, but, it begs the question06:02
hggdhno, it does not seem to be a fix06:02
hggdhit is a bypass06:02
micahgwhat was the original problem though?06:03
hggdhafter upgrade of ff, no more flash06:03
micahgwhy would flash need to be reinstalled after a ff update?06:03
micahgor is that the question?06:04
hggdhthat's the reporter's experience06:04
micahgok06:04
micahgtthis is what i've been posting if the user solves the problem with an update: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Bugs%20resolved%20after%20update%20or%20config%20change06:05
micahgis that not correct in this case?06:06
hggdhhold on06:06
hggdhthis would be the wrong response, I am afraid06:07
micahgok06:07
micahgcan you explain please, I'd love to know why06:07
hggdhthe bug was not resolved after an upgrade, the bug *appeared* after an updgrade06:07
hggdhit the upgrade that caused the user problem06:08
hggdhand s/he had to reinstall nsplugin-nonfree06:08
micahgyes, but we don't know if it was a problem with flash or a conflict with swfdec and flash06:08
hggdhindeed, we do not know06:08
hggdhthis is a reason to keep it open06:09
hggdhso if we could reproduce, it would help06:09
micahgah, ok06:09
micahgwhich brings me back to my original question06:09
hggdh(although methinks if this was to be a critical issue, we would have some dups)06:09
micahgis there a reason why flash, gnash, and swfdec aren't marked as conflicts?06:09
micahgalso, I've been moving stuff from firefox to firefox-3.0 as the source since ff3 is not categorized in launchpad under firefox, is this correct?06:10
hggdhI do not know. asac is the master on ff06:11
micahgfor which question?06:11
micahgshould I ask?06:11
micahgor both?06:11
hggdhif it was an apport-generated bug, it should carry the correct pacakge06:11
micahgthey usually aren't06:11
micahgthe ones I've been dealing with anyways06:12
micahgI've been trying to go through untouched ff and ff3 bugs06:12
micahgThere are over 700 in both sources06:12
hggdhon my system /usr/bin/firefox is a soft link to firefox-3.0, which is a soft link to /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.10/firefox.sh06:13
micahgif you look at the versions for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox06:14
micahgand then this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.006:14
hggdhmicahg, notice that most of the new bugs are under ff-3.006:15
micahgyep :)06:15
micahgthat's why I would think to move the ff3 busg out of the firefox soure06:16
micahgsource06:16
hggdhbut older Ubuntus will still have the ffox 2.x06:16
micahgyep06:16
hggdhah06:16
hggdhOK, I think now I get it: you are moving ff-3.0 bugs off ffox06:16
micahgyep06:16
hggdhgood06:17
micahgbut only if I have something else to comment, like an upgrade request or more info or something06:17
micahgI'm trying not to make noise for those people that are already flooded06:17
hggdh:-)06:18
micahg:)06:18
micahgshould I ping asac for my flash questions?06:18
hggdhwell, he is the master of ffox06:19
micahgshould I ping him in here or in private?06:19
hggdhmicahg, you already pinged him (the moment you typed his nick)06:29
micahgah06:30
micahgcool06:30
hggdhthis is why, when you are talking about someone (but do not want to, er, call), you mistype the nick, or use the name06:33
micahgi thought it only pinged the person if you prefixed the line with the name and a colon06:34
hggdhno, it is anywhere in the line, micahg06:34
micahgok06:35
micahgcan you type tha06:35
micahgoops06:35
hggdh?06:36
micahgI was going to ask if you can type again so I can check06:36
hggdhtype what. micahg ?06:36
hggdhheh06:36
micahgyep06:36
micahgok06:36
micahggood to know :)06:36
hggdhyes, it is. It is also good to keep that in mind so not to keep pinging people unnecessarily06:37
micahgok06:37
micahgwill keep in mind06:38
micahgi think I asked this before, but wasn't clear o the answer06:42
hggdhno prob06:43
micahgif someone asks a question about an outdated ubuntu version, what d you do?06:43
micahgbug 37103006:43
ubot4`Launchpad bug 371030 in firefox "very slow to sign in" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/37103006:43
micahgit's for feisty06:43
hggdhhum06:47
hggdhwe do not have a stock response for obsolete versions...06:47
micahgShould I suggest that the user upgrade to Hardy or later?06:48
hggdhyou can point the reporter to answers.launchpad.net ("cannot log in" really does not sound like not a ffox bug), and warn that this version of Ubuntu is no longer supported (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases)06:49
hggdhor the forums06:49
hggdhand suggest to upgrade, yes06:50
micahgShould I mark it invalid or incomplete?06:50
hggdhgive the explanation, and transform it into a question06:51
hggdh(which will invalidate the bug automagically)06:51
micahgSo, I should use the support request text with a mention of support ended for feisty06:52
micahg?06:52
hggdhyes06:52
micahgsone06:53
micahgdone06:53
micahgbtw06:53
micahgff3.0 has 666 new bugs in it :)06:53
hggdhwell, yes, there were some issues with it06:53
hggdh(and you are not counting the dups)06:54
micahgI was referring to the count, not the amount06:54
micahg666 has some negative connotations06:55
hggdhoh06:55
hggdhheh. Not being christian, I forget about this ...06:55
micahgi'm not either06:56
micahgbut I thought it was interesting06:56
micahgand I just ruined it...06:57
hggdhwhat, you opened a new one?06:57
micahgno, converted one to a question :)06:57
hggdhoh06:57
hggdhwell, we just wait a bit, and a new bug should pop in06:58
hggdhg'night micahg. Time to pack in07:00
micahgnight hggdh07:00
micahgI'm going to bed soonm mysql07:00
micahgoops07:00
micahgmysqlf07:00
micahgmyself07:00
micahgbug 244529 shoudl be wishlist or question?07:19
ubot4`Launchpad bug 244529 in firefox-3.0 "Let Firefox open .log files inside the browser" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24452907:19
YoBoYgood morning07:22
micahggood morning07:23
micahgYoBoY: could you answer my question?07:25
YoBoYgive me some time ^^07:28
micahgok07:30
YoBoYthe use of the ~/.mime.types is the way firefox work (it's in the about:config) so i think this is a question07:41
YoBoYmicahg: ↑07:41
micahgok07:42
micahgi was going to link here07:42
micahghttp://kb.mozillazine.org/File_types_and_download_actions07:42
micahgafter converting to a Q07:42
YoBoYok07:51
YoBoYnew bug 371127 if someone can confirm :)07:52
ubot4`Launchpad bug 371127 in firefox-3.0 "Strange URL in pfs.datasource.url field on the about:config" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/37112707:52
micahgconfirmed07:54
YoBoYtanks07:57
micahgI'm trying to get the new ff3.0 bugs under 650 again07:57
YoBoYgoog eye ^^07:58
YoBoYgood07:58
YoBoYi haven't see the other link :p07:58
micahgI used the filter :D08:01
YoBoYyes i found the first with the mime keyword ^^"08:04
micahgcan I get someone to mark bug 242265 as wishlist?08:37
ubot4`Launchpad bug 242265 in thunderbird "This is not a bug " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24226508:37
micahgoops08:38
micahgnevermind08:38
micahgI'll do this another night08:38
arteekHi, could somebody help me to resolve my doubts concerning proper way to triage a bug?08:44
arteekI have a following bug report 364444 that in fact is not a bug report but rather question.08:45
arteekIn the same time user filled questin on https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/68291 that is the same as above bug report08:46
arteekWhat should I do with the original bug report. The question as already solved.08:46
arteeks/as/is08:46
YoBoYbug 36444409:03
ubot4`Launchpad bug 364444 in ubuntu-docs "problem with netgear WG311v3 wireless card" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36444409:03
YoBoYarteek: seem the correct procedure, the question exist, so no need to convert, invalidate is a good choice09:04
arteekYoBoY: I already did it. I read once again a wiki and found answer, so I'm sorry for a question;-)09:06
YoBoYi know you already did it, i juste confirmed it's a good choice :p09:06
arteekYoBoY: Oh yes, sorry. Thanks anyway for your confirmation.09:07
YoBoYno problem, tanks to your work09:08
arteekYoBoY: one question: does it possible to assign bug to existing question. This question had answer and been solved but if the question would be still open what with such case I sould do?09:12
YoBoYdon't know, never tested, wait, i give it a try on staging09:14
arteekok09:15
YoBoYthe bug and the question are already linked :]09:17
YoBoYby the way, when you are on a question, you can link it to a bug, it's an option on the right menu09:18
arteekYes I see, but of course I still have to marking bug as invalid?09:20
arteekIn this case?09:20
YoBoYyes09:20
arteekok, I think this procedure should be add to the wiki.09:20
YoBoYyes, should appear somewhere09:21
YoBoYyou can ask on the ML09:22
arteekI will, thank you for your help:-)09:22
=== erhesrhsrtb54vyh is now known as Elbrus
askandregarding the Jaunty freezes, is there a mainbug on this yet?12:36
askandTo clarify I mean bug 355155 for example12:43
ubot4`Launchpad bug 355155 in linux "Computer hard locks randomly with ubuntu jaunty" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/35515512:43
thekorn /! sudo apt-get install me-tv13:35
thekornargh, sorry13:35
BUGabundohi gnomefreak14:02
gnomefreakhi BUGabundo14:03
gnomefreakBUGabundo: do you rellize that you are pretty much the only one that sent dents since yesterday it seems14:04
BUGabundono!14:08
BUGabundoI get a lot from everyone else14:08
BUGabundoand I wasn't online most of yesterday either14:09
BUGabundognomefreak: http://www.macno.org/denticator.php?user=bugabundo&weekchart=bar&daychart=bar14:09
BUGabundoor http://www.macno.org/denticator.php?user=gnomefreak&weekchart=bar&daychart=bar14:09
BUGabundoor even http://www.macno.org/denticator.php?user=asac&weekchart=bar&daychart=bar14:09
BUGabundohumm OT ... sorry about that14:09
* BUGabundo needs to learn to see in which # talk is going on14:09
gnomefreak:) thanks for links14:10
BUGabundonp14:11
micahgI just discovered that Realplayer has not  been supported officially in Ubuntu for 3 years14:20
micahgbut now there is Medibuntu14:20
BUGabundolol micahg14:20
micahgcan I go clear out all the bugs related to realplayer for current releases14:20
BUGabundo !medibuntu14:20
ubot4`medibuntu is a repository of packages that cannot be included into the Ubuntu distribution for legal reasons - See http://www.medibuntu.org14:20
micahgyes14:21
micahgso here's what I did for one of them14:22
micahghttps://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/6973514:22
BUGabundomicahg: looks good14:26
micahgso, should I do it to the rest of the realplayer bugs for versions > dapper?14:27
BUGabundomicahg: we don't have RealPlayer, its 3rd party and closed14:27
BUGabundoits not *our* bug14:27
BUGabundoif medibuntu works, great, if it doesn't, complain to Real!14:27
micahgright, but there are plenty of issues in the bug tracker for Ubuntu14:28
micahgI figured I could clear them out14:28
micahgand that's exactly the point, it's not an ubuntu bug and shouldn't be in the bug tracker14:28
micahgI'm just trying to get a semi official ok to go convert about 15-20 bugs to questions14:29
Hobbseemicahg: don't think most people will be able to give you one, but go ahead - sounds reasonable14:31
BUGabundomicahg: you can upstream all medibuntu bugs and mark the ones for ubuntu as invalid14:31
BUGabundoMB is hosted on LP so its easy14:32
hggdhmicahg, https://launchpad.net/medibuntu/14:32
hggdhmicahg, the package should be medibuntu14:34
BUGabundohggdh: as I said, for all bugs just invalidate the ubuntu task and upstream it14:35
micahgBUGabundo: the problem, is that they probably aren't bugs at all, but just using bad deb packages14:36
micahgso, I don't want to clutter the Medibuntu bug tracker unnecessarily as I would hope that others wouldn't clutter ours, right?14:36
BUGabundohumm if they are medibuntu packages, then they are bugs...14:37
micahgthat's why I figure convert to qeustion14:37
micahgyes14:37
BUGabundoof course it depends on what the user is stating14:37
micahgbut they don't have the medibuntu stuff installed14:37
micahgyes14:37
BUGabundoah then its not a MB bug14:37
BUGabundoLOL14:37
micahgok14:37
BUGabundoyes question is a better action for those cases14:37
micahgI'll go bug slaying...14:37
BUGabundoalways ask for apt-cache policy PACKAGE14:38
BUGabundoand you will see the source...14:38
BUGabundoif its not archive, most prob its not either our or MB bug14:38
BUGabundojust someone who got a deb or source from somewhre (even not from real site, but some forum/blog)14:38
micahgyep, but since we don't even support realplayer anymore, I'm just going to refer them to medibuntu14:39
micahgthere's no point going back and forth and cluttering up people's inboxes who are watching the answer tracker/bug tracker14:40
BUGabundoyeah14:40
BUGabundobut see what they have and how they got it14:41
BUGabundothey should be removing and purging old stuff14:41
micahgeven though it's not supported I should do this?14:41
BUGabundodoesn't hurt, does it?14:41
micahgwell, it's back and forth that might be unnecessary14:42
micahgif they add the medibuntu repo and upgrade14:42
BUGabundoif ppl really want the mediubuntu one, and have some other source, it's a good, clean way to get it working14:42
micahgwell, the thing is, if I'm replying to medibuntu issues in ubuntu, I can';t triage ubuntu things in ubuntu'14:44
micahgI agree with you in principle though14:44
micahgbut the ubuntu backlog is large right now, no?14:44
BUGabundohum having that on Answers isn't that bad14:44
BUGabundomicahg: bugs backlog? large? no!!!!14:45
hggdhwhat backlog? ;-)14:45
BUGabundolast time I heard some one making stats on it, if LP was closed for new bugs, it would take 5 years to triage all opened bugs14:45
BUGabundoand that was last year14:45
BUGabundoalthough bug jams seems to help A LOT14:45
micahgI've been trying to do about 10 a night, more info or convert to question14:47
micahgI'm not able to actually patch stuff yet14:47
BUGabundomicahg: np14:47
BUGabundoall your work is good... anyone can/should happened doing what one does best14:47
micahgyeah, I've only had positive feedback in here and from the users14:49
BUGabundomicahg: eheh great14:51
micahgbug 367103, I'm tempted to convert to question because user seems confused15:26
ubot4`Launchpad bug 367103 in ubuntu "no audio on streaming radio sites" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36710315:26
micahgI've got to run out for a while, but if someone can answer ^^^^ when they get a chance, I'll check back later15:35
BUGabundomicahg: let me read it15:36
BUGabundomicahg: sound like either an audio bug, or codec one15:37
BUGabundoshould ask for apport info on both15:37
hggdhrealplayer?15:44
BUGabundowho knows15:46
BUGabundouser doesn't mention the origin of the stream15:46
micahgI was oging to ask which site first so we can determine which plugin has the trouble15:51
BUGabundook15:52
micahgbut I should keep it in the bug tracker for the moment?15:53
BUGabundosure15:53
hggdhyes15:53
BUGabundoit may end being an audio bug15:53
BUGabundobut my suspistion goes with user error, or codec not installed15:54
BUGabundoany one interessed http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/19607/ ?15:54
BUGabundobrb rebboting to Karmic Koala 9.10 pre-alpha15:55
dyfetI like the foundation behind the idea...of improving upstream communication15:55
micahgdoes brainstorm use the same logis launchpad?n a15:56
hggdhmicahg, I do not know, never been there16:26
micahgok, nevermind, I jsut created an account16:26
elena09good evening16:29
micahgcan someone mark 318359 as wishlist16:35
micahgoops16:35
micahgbug 31835916:36
ubot4`micahg: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out16:36
BUGabundohey elena09 good to see you back, and that we didn't scare you too much16:36
* BUGabundo kicks ubot4` and LP timeouts16:36
BUGabundobug 31835916:36
ubot4`Launchpad bug 318359 in firefox "' - Mozilla Firefox' always appended to window title" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/31835916:36
* BUGabundo when all other means fails, try to kick it!16:37
micahgwhat do you mark upstream, non-ubuntu issues?16:45
micahgactually16:45
micahgscratch that16:46
micahgit is an ubuntu issue16:46
BUGabundoeheh16:48
BUGabundomicahg: how long have you been doing triage?16:49
micahguh oh :)16:49
micahgummm, about 2 weeks maybe16:49
micahgwhat did I do?16:49
=== kyselejsyrecek is now known as kyselasyrecka
BUGabundomicahg: oh nothing bad AFAIK16:50
BUGabundojust asking...16:50
micahgactually16:50
micahgonly about a week :)16:50
micahgI thought I messed up on bug 31835916:50
ubot4`Launchpad bug 318359 in firefox "' - Mozilla Firefox' always appended to window title" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/31835916:50
BUGabundomicahg: maybe you could apply for bug control in a month or so16:50
micahgok16:51
micahgcool16:51
micahgdoes 5 a day mean you have to do 5 a day or can you average 35 a week?16:51
BUGabundobdmurray: ping ^^^^^^^^^^16:52
micahgBUGabundo: can you wishlist 318359?16:52
BUGabundomicahg: what did you do with that bug? seems fine, its an upstream bug, where the user can track it on LP too16:52
micahgyes, I added the upstream16:52
BUGabundolooks good16:52
BUGabundobut upstream will surelly mark it as won't fix16:52
BUGabundothey like the PUB lol16:53
micahgbut, I wanted to add a note to go to brainstorm to discuss removing the browser branding16:53
BUGabundomicahg: and no, I can't change bugs prio. I'm not (yet??) on bug control team16:53
BUGabundomicahg: again, this is not an Ubuntu bug, but an upstream one16:53
micahgah16:53
micahgok16:53
micahgwell, for the moment it is in upstream control16:54
BUGabundoand Mozilla is not quite good at accepting deltas from distros while mantainig the Branding16:54
micahgbut, user wants epiphany behaviour which has no branding at all16:54
micahgwhich would be up to ubuntu if the upstream bug was taken care of16:54
micahghggdh: can you wishlist one for me?16:55
hggdhwhich one?16:55
micahgbug 31835916:55
ubot4`Launchpad bug 318359 in firefox "' - Mozilla Firefox' always appended to window title" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/31835916:55
BUGabundomicahg: if Mozilla actually did that (which they won't, I think) then ubuntu would have the change too16:57
hggdhmicahg, whish-listed16:57
micahgthanks16:57
micahgBUGabundo: yes, but the upstream request is only for customiatio16:58
hggdhBUGabundo, there is an upstream bug on that... so we let mozilla figure it out16:58
micahgubuntu would then have the option for epiphany behaviour or not16:58
hggdhcustomisation also means taking out16:58
micahgwhich couuld be discussed on bainstorm16:58
micahg*brainstorm16:58
hggdhbarnstorm?16:58
BUGabundobarkstorm16:59
BUGabundo;)16:59
hggdh:-D16:59
micahgI was wonderign what qualifies as triaged?16:59
micahgah16:59
micahgyou are member of Ubuntu Bug Control and made the call16:59
=== kyselasyrecka is now known as kyselejsyrecek
micahghggdh: I'm assuming I should place the proper comments for the user still?17:02
BUGabundomicahg: AFAICT "triage" is to go around bugs and trying to improve them so that the Dev as a GOOD bug report17:02
hggdhmicahg, what proper comments?17:02
micahghttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/163627/17:02
BUGabundomicahg: yeah, feed back is always a good thing17:03
hggdhhold on17:03
BUGabundohumm LP can also fetch info from Mozilla bugzilla17:03
hggdhmicahg, yes, please do it17:04
BUGabundoand there are a couple of typos in there17:04
micahgalso, how long does ubuntu pastebin last?17:04
hggdhwould say a few days17:04
micahgBUGabundo: typos in my text?17:04
BUGabundo"http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ where "17:04
BUGabundoI would go with "Brainstorm (URL HERE) is where...."17:05
BUGabundooh wait17:05
BUGabundoits a two line sentence17:05
BUGabundosorry about that17:05
hggdhheh17:05
micahgI shouldn't have discussed in there twice17:05
micahgBUGabundo: LP updated 10 minutes ago17:06
micahgIt's cool that launchpad tells you if other bugs point to the same upstream bug17:14
BUGabundodoes it?17:19
BUGabundodind know that17:19
BUGabundomicahg: do you have an example?17:19
micahgwell, I set the upstream on bug 33044917:21
ubot4`Launchpad bug 330449 in firefox "about: screen shows the wrong version number (dup-of: 194894)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33044917:21
ubot4`Launchpad bug 194894 in firefox "[MASTER] Firefox reports "version 1.9b3" in "about:"" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19489417:21
micahgand it told me 2 other bugs had it set17:21
micahgQ about bug 36514317:24
ubot4`Launchpad bug 365143 in firefox "Firefox should embed PDF's" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36514317:24
micahgit's already possible17:24
micahgbut, maybe user is asking if it shoudl be default?17:24
micahgI was going to convert to question17:24
micahgI could convert to question and still comment about brainstorm17:26
BUGabundoehe17:32
BUGabundoyou do love questions and BS lol17:33
micahgwell, I want to clear out the bug tracker17:33
micahg* try to17:33
BUGabundoeheh17:33
BUGabundogreat work!17:33
micahgso, q + bs?17:33
micahgor wishlist + bs?17:33
micahgactually, there's already a blueprint in launchpad for it17:35
micahgbut it's 2.5 years old17:35
BUGabundofor what?17:36
micahgembedded pdfs in FF17:36
BUGabundooh17:39
micahgI did Q + BS17:39
micahgasac ping17:47
micahgI'm wondering if bug 297369 is by design17:48
ubot4`micahg: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out17:48
* micahg kicks ubot4`17:48
micahgbug 29736917:48
ubot4`Launchpad bug 297369 in firefox-3.0 "About:config edit var" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29736917:49
BUGabundoahahaha17:50
BUGabundomicahg: you already learn how that works!!!! by kicking the bot117:50
BUGabundo:))))))17:50
micahgI'm a quick study17:50
BUGabundoquick *learner* you mean micahg17:51
hggdhmicahg, not sure. Let's try it17:54
micahgtry to modify it?17:54
micahgthe useragentswitch plugin is the easy way to do it17:54
hggdhyes. (Although I am on 9.04, and the reporter on 8.04)17:54
micahgbut i'm just want to know if it resets by design17:55
micahgI think it does17:55
micahgbecause there is an override value in there17:55
micahghttp://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_:_FAQs_:_About:config_Entries#General..2A17:55
micahghggdh: wondering if I should convert to Q and refer to useragenswitch plugin17:56
hggdhI think it is a good idea, mostly because there is already a plugin to do that17:58
micahgok17:58
micahgahhh...bugs are addictive...18:02
BUGabundoare they?18:04
hggdhthey are. They are addictive and multiplicative, have closure, but are uncountable18:50
BUGabundoeheh18:51
hggdhbut... they are not abelian18:54
Rocket2DMnhey guys, bug 129223 has some dups marked by apport, but no trace18:58
ubot4`Launchpad bug 129223 in willowng "willowng crashed with ImportError in <module>()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12922318:58
Rocket2DMnwhat would you like to do with it18:59
BUGabundoRocket2DMn: doesn't LP remove traces when it autodupes bugs?19:01
Rocket2DMnBUGabundo, yes, but its strange b/c the parent bug doesnt have a trace19:01
micahgbug 25936519:12
ubot4`Launchpad bug 259365 in firefox-3.0 "Please update Firefox 3 Thai locale from CVS" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25936519:12
micahgfix was released by mozilla, and got into ubuntu19:12
micahgDO I mark Fix Released even though no upstream bug islsited?19:12
=== maco_ is now known as macogw
BUGabundomicahg: is it in the repos? if so, sure, if not Fix Commited19:21
micahgyep19:21
micahgok, so I had a bug that I converted to a Q, I just found a dup that19:22
micahgs a little more descriptive19:22
micahgbut still should become a Q19:22
micahgnevermind19:28
micahgHow do I check if a certain language version of FF is in ubuntu?20:12
BUGabundomicahg: translation ?20:15
micahgit's not under that tab20:15
micahgBUGabundo: it appears to be there20:19
micahgbut it's hard to find20:19
micahgi had to use google :(20:19
savvasmicahg: dpkg -L language-pack-xx-base | grep firefox20:22
savvaswhere "xx" is the code of the language you want20:22
micahgwhat if I donm't have it installed20:24
savvasi might be wrong though20:25
savvasfrom what I see, they're like extensions20:26
savvas/usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-el@firefox-3.0.ubuntu.com20:26
savvasmicahg: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=language-pack-20:27
savvasyou select a release and under "Files" there's a link [list of files]20:28
micahgok20:29
micahgWhat I was looking for isn't there20:29
micahgso it didn't make it in yet20:29
virtualdi'm trying to find a bug report about xorg on radeon crashing when the screen saver is running, does anyone know about it?20:29
virtualdon jaunty20:29
savvasmicahg: which language?20:30
savvasit doesn't show all the language packages there unforunately20:31
savvashttp://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/language-pack-xx-base <- xx = your language code20:31
micahget20:32
PiciI'm having issues similar to bug #345900, but I'm not sure what I should do to provide more information or fix..20:35
ubot4`Pici: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out20:35
Picihttps://bugs.launchpad.net/pyglet/+bug/34590020:36
ubot4`Launchpad bug 345900 in ubuntu "opengl issues with ati FireGL card" [Undecided,New]20:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!