[01:39] wubi: Agostino Russo * r131 trunk/ (7 files in 4 dirs): (log message trimmed) [01:39] wubi: * Mixed up encode/decode str methods, again [01:39] wubi: * Encode unicode translations to avoid file write failures (LP: [01:39] wubi: #365642) [01:39] wubi: * Do not quit if there are ISO extraction problems, try to download [01:39] wubi: instead (LP: #371264) [01:39] wubi: * Do not quit if there are ISO info parsing errors due to file [01:58] wubi: Agostino Russo * r132 trunk/ (debian/changelog src/wubi/backends/common/backend.py): Avoid white spaces in ISO name (LP: #365829) === mcasadevall is now known as NCOmmander === NCOmmander is now known as NCommander === robbiew-away is now known as robbiew [07:37] ubiquity: superm1 * r3256 ubiquity/ (debian/changelog scripts/mythbuntu/mythbuntu_install.py): [07:37] ubiquity: Be more specific about packages that are removed in role selection. [07:37] ubiquity: Unfortunately prior to this fix, choosing a Frontend role for example [07:37] ubiquity: was not cleaning up mysql, apache, or mythtv-backend (completely [07:37] ubiquity: defeating the purpose of a frontend role). [09:54] evand, davmor2 I pushed out rev132, could you please build and test? [09:55] sure [09:55] np's [09:56] Keybuk pointed out to me last night that pitti landed DeviceKit-disks in Karmic, so I'm going to start working on moving usb-creator away from HAL and onto that. [09:57] davmor2 it would help if you could reproduce 369225 [09:57] bug 369225 [09:57] Launchpad bug 369225 in wubi "It seems that fat32 filesystem is not identified correctly in some cases" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/369225 [09:58] you need a fat partition, you should usually see the filesystem in the log file if you grep for "drive", if there isn't any there is an issue [09:58] xivulon: I've got a fat version of xp backed up so I can drop that onto my test box and try it :) [09:59] won't be till latter on though [09:59] np, the log should look like: Drive(C: hd 17105.21875 mb free FILESYSTEM) [10:00] evand could you see if you can add the wubi or ubuntu icon to the certificate? [10:00] they are both in the data/images [10:05] xivulon: please file a bug for it and assign it to me. [10:11] xivulon: Mind moving your changelog entries since 9.04 to a new 9.10 entry? It'll be easier for us to see difference between releases. We should also bzr tag the final revision that was used for Jaunty as 9.04 [10:28] evand the bug fixes are still for 9.04 [10:28] I plan to do a release for the stand-alone to fix outstanding bug in there at least [10:28] davmor2, this should be the patch for bug 369225 http://paste.ubuntu.com/165987/ [10:28] Launchpad bug 369225 in wubi "It seems that fat32 filesystem is not identified correctly in some cases" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/369225 [10:29] I think that after 369225 is addressed we can move to 9.10 [10:38] davmor2, revised patch: http://paste.ubuntu.com/165992/ [10:40] usb-creator: evand * r103 future/usbcreator/gtk_frontend.py: Fix a call to logging that was broken by a previous commit. [10:40] usb-creator: evand * r104 future/ (tests tests/test_device_added.py): Forgot to bzr add tests. [10:40] take 3: http://paste.ubuntu.com/165995/ [11:49] xivulon: with take 3 I'm getting a build error [11:50] http://paste.ubuntu.com/166015/ === dpm_ is now known as dpm [12:12] evand: am I right in assuming that the ^ under the : is the culprit for the wubi build break in the instance above? [12:13] I imagine it's the : at the end of line 45 in the diff [12:14] delete that and it should work [12:14] davmor2, my bad, remove the ":" at src\wubi\backends\win32\drive.py line 56 [12:15] thanks guys but hey I figured it out ish :) Yay that work this time :) [12:16] ah also "def get_filesystem(self)" not "def get_filesystem(path)" [12:17] davmor2 ^ [12:18] xivulon: right changed building again [12:18] I'll get there sooner or later: http://paste.ubuntu.com/166034/ === davmor21 is now known as davmor2 [12:43] xivulon: I hit an issue on fat windows install just running wubi. http://paste.ubuntu.com/166042/ I'm not sure if the 2 are linked which is why I haven't reported against the original bug [12:43] evand: too ^ [12:51] davmor2 for some reason the parsing of .disk/info inside the ISO returned null [12:51] by the way was this using the patch 166034? [13:05] davmor2 could it be that the downloaded ISO is corrupted? can you manually check the md5 of c:\ubuntu\installation\installation.iso? [13:12] hi [13:12] davmor2, assuming that the above is due to ISO corruption, this should make the process more robust (a good thing anyway): http://paste.ubuntu.com/166057/ [13:13] I now install ubonto 9.04 and I have trouble with install my printer. This is the place to ask about it? [13:15] ? [13:15] yoni9972, you are probably better off asking in #ubuntu [13:36] xivulon: rebuilding now [13:38] davmor2 was the above log with the patch http://paste.ubuntu.com/166042/ applied? [13:39] xivulon: as far as I can tell yes, but I rebuilt with 166057 now [13:39] doesn't look good in terms of filesystem detection [13:40] xivulon: File "Z:\home\davmor2\wubi\src\wubi\backends\win32\drive.py", line 51 [13:40] if not hasattr(ctypes.windll.kernel32, "GetVolumeInformationA") [13:41] first it complained about the : at the end now the ) [13:41] can you change, path = self.path[0] '\\' to path = self.path[0] ':\\' [13:42] one sec let's do take8 [13:43] http://paste.ubuntu.com/166070/ [13:44] ah wrong paste, not my day [13:45] http://paste.ubuntu.com/166072/ [13:46] * xivulon opens bets on number of digits for last paste [14:40] 178001 is my bet [14:52] xivulon: this seems to be happier :) === Nicke_ is now known as Nicke [15:34] xivulon: this seems to of locked up on creating virtual disks [16:11] xivulon: D'oh my fault I forgot I'd only got a small partition due to fat32 being crap [16:11] I'm trying again with wubi's install taking up a little less space [16:29] xivulon: Ah maybe not hangs in exactly the same place === robbiew is now known as robbiew-away [18:36] hi, i have a few questions with respects to making a custom alternates CD with a specific preseed and package list. I have figured out the preseed stuff and got that working, but i am having problems using my custom package set [18:36] where would be a good place to start looking for more information on this? [18:37] i was playing with simple-cdd, but it seems to not work with ubuntu... unless im doing it wrong. === robbiew-away is now known as robbiew [20:00] evand: we're thinking about using usb-creator as part of Sugar's USB stick distribution. Would you accept a well-tested patch to add a "--sugar" option that changed the way format_drive works to make the USB drive in our special way? [20:01] evand: (we're creating two partitions, one boot fat32 and the other ext3, but other than that it's pretty much the same) [20:15] lfaraone, wouldn't it just make more sense to detect the different type of image at runtime and the fact that it's expected to be written out to USB differently then within the codepath? [20:15] or are sugar images essentially ubuntu images with no visible differences/ [22:43] superm1: well, for example: options such as the persistance slider are pretty much useless for our setup. [22:44] superm1: so I guess, if the image passed at the command line meets TEST, then grey out / remove persistance options, write *this* way, etc would work. [23:08] okay i got my installer cd booting, but the cdrom-detect fails saying its not an Ubuntu CD [23:08] did i miss a file on the root of the CD? [23:08] how does it tell that its a ubuntu cdrom? [23:10] is that what the .disk folder in the root of the iso image does? [23:34] wubi: Agostino Russo * r133 trunk/ (5 files in 3 dirs): [23:34] wubi: * Fixed vfat filesystem detection (LP: #369225) [23:34] wubi: * More robust ISO check to avoid failures when the ISO file is [23:34] wubi: corrupted [23:46] lfaraone, i'm meaning more specifically when the image detection routine runs. add some code in there, so it won't matter whether you hit browse or if you send it as a command line argument. If you detect a sugar ISO, disable persistence settings, and set up a particular partition ordering routine [23:47] i think a patch like that would be very acceptable [23:49] *sigh* im getting closer, now its complaining that it cannot find a valid release file... [23:50] is there documentation on the format and location of that somewhere? [23:54] superm1: Ok, that I can do. Can I also add it as a command-line override? [23:55] lfaraone, you'd want to ask evand about that, he's the one who would make the end decisions on it [23:55] lfaraone, i'm just providing some recommendations [23:56] superm1: Ok. Thanks!