/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/05/09/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

=== bazhang_ is now known as bazhang
=== jcastro_ is now known as jcastro
VK7HSEelky: Are you about ???06:15
VK7HSEOops wrong IRC ;-)06:18
=== jussi01 is now known as Tuhina
=== Tuhina is now known as jussi01
=== ember_ is now known as ember
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== jussi01 is now known as tuhina
=== tuhina is now known as jussi01
=== RoAk is now known as RoAkSoAx
cprofitt#startmeeting22:05
MootBotMeeting started at 16:05. The chair is cprofitt.22:05
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]22:05
cprofitt[TOPIC] Mission Statement22:05
MootBotNew Topic:  Mission Statement22:05
nhandler[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Agenda22:06
MootBotLINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Agenda22:06
doctormoHere22:06
cprofittHello all...22:06
* pleia2 waves22:06
cprofittThanks for making it to the Ubuntu-Learning meeting22:06
VantraxThanks cp22:07
cprofittBefore we begin our first topic I would like to let everyone know that we need to prepare a 'rationale' for the CC (Community Council) meeting on June 2nd22:07
cprofitt[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Rationale22:08
MootBotLINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Rationale22:08
cprofittWe will use some of the topics today to help generate that22:08
DougieRichardsonShould this not be a specification?22:08
cprofittand we will discuss that later in the meeting... but I wanted you all to see that page.22:08
DougieRichardsonOK22:08
VantraxIt will be part of the specification yes22:08
cprofittDougieRichardson, I have seen that used as well...22:08
doctormoShould I add my rationale to the page, or here?22:09
cprofittnow.... for the first topic...22:09
Vantraxto that page doctormo22:09
cprofittMission Statement22:09
cprofittopens the floor up to any suggestions22:10
VantraxI agree with the change proposed, basically swapping out the first line of the existing project outline with that one22:10
pleia2I like the suggestion given on the wiki page22:10
Vantraxis that the correct understanding?22:10
cprofittyes, that is the idea Vantrax22:10
cprofittunless others want to suggest some more 'changes' to the word smithing22:10
cprofittif there are no other comments we can vote on the proposed change...22:11
VantraxI think you guys did a great job with it22:11
cprofitt[VOTE] Accept the proposed change to the mission statement (on the agenda)22:11
MootBotPlease vote on:  Accept the proposed change to the mission statement (on the agenda).22:11
MootBotPublic votes can be registered by saying +1/-1/+0 in the channel, private votes by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0  to MootBot22:11
MootBotE.g. /msg MootBot +1 #ubuntu-meeting22:11
cprofitt+122:11
MootBot+1 received from cprofitt. 1 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 122:11
thewrath+122:12
MootBot+1 received from thewrath. 2 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 222:12
nhandler022:12
nhandler+022:12
MootBotAbstention received from nhandler. 2 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 222:12
pleia2+122:12
Vantrax+122:12
MootBot+1 received from pleia2. 3 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 322:12
MootBot+1 received from Vantrax. 4 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 422:12
DougieRichardson+122:12
MootBot+1 received from DougieRichardson. 5 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 522:12
cprofittLast call for votes22:12
cprofittanyone need more time?22:12
cprofitt[ENDVOTE]22:13
MootBotFinal result is 5 for, 0 against. 1 abstained. Total: 522:13
cprofitt[AGREED] Change the mission statement to - The project is focused on building and maintaining an interactive learning environment(s) to support all aspects of the Ubuntu Ecosystem22:13
MootBotAGREED received:  Change the mission statement to - The project is focused on building and maintaining an interactive learning environment(s) to support all aspects of the Ubuntu Ecosystem22:13
cprofitt[TOPIC] Goals: We need to evaluate the goals of the whole project and draw up immediate goals, short term goals and long term goals.22:13
MootBotNew Topic:  Goals: We need to evaluate the goals of the whole project and draw up immediate goals, short term goals and long term goals.22:13
pleia2tall order :)22:14
Vantraxvery tall22:14
cprofittIt is a tall order...22:14
nhandlerOne short term goal would be to get approved by the CC22:14
pleia2short term: contact teams, get moodle running22:14
cprofittand one I do not think we can full flesh out here, but I would like to build consensus on that we need to evaluate...22:14
Vantraxmy suggestion is to create concrete short term goals and become more general for the medium and long term22:14
doctormoGah my stupid computer crashed, I need the logs!22:14
thewrath+1 Vantrax22:14
VantraxMid term goal is to create the 4 programs for stage 122:15
cprofittI agree with immediate, short term, medium term, long range pool22:15
doctormocprofitt: +122:15
cprofittI do not think we need to vote that they need to be fleshed out...22:15
Vantraxtime frame would ideally be for 10.422:15
thewraththat would be a good time period22:15
cprofittVantrax can you build a page on the wiki for goals...22:16
Vantraxproblem will be work volume unless we have more contributors22:16
pleia2it also depends on portions of the project22:16
Vantraxill start one22:16
yvan300Vantrax: i'll help u22:16
pleia2the -classroom portion will still be recruiting folks to do IRC sessions22:16
cprofitt[ACTION] Vantrax to start wiki page for goals - immediate, short term, medium term, long range pool22:16
MootBotACTION received:  Vantrax to start wiki page for goals - immediate, short term, medium term, long range pool22:16
doctormoVantrax: Design should focus on leveraing the community and community growth.22:17
cprofitt+1 pleia222:17
thewrathI can help with doing some IRC sessions that should not be an issue22:17
pleia2cprofitt: maybe we move on from this topic and let the wiki speak for itself?22:17
cprofittyes22:17
cprofittlets use the wiki as a draft page... and everyone can contribute their thoughts22:17
doctormohang on, does the wiki still say that we're here to serve the -classrooms irc lessons?22:18
yvan300+1 cprofitt22:18
pleia2doctormo: -classroom is a sub-project of Ubuntu Learning22:18
cprofittdoctormo, no... IRC -classroom is part of our overall project...22:18
thewrathdoctormo: do you mean like how the wording is that we server only the classroom lessons?22:18
doctormopleia2: Do we have a list of sub-projects?22:18
cprofittsome people who come on-board will use IRC22:18
pleia2doctormo: official list? I don't think so22:18
Vantraxdoctormo: they should be added to the LP22:19
cprofittdoctormo, we do not have such a list yet...22:19
pleia2but so far, -classroom, beginners team education focus group22:19
doctormoIt would be good to have a list, I'm not in the IRC classrooms sub-project or it's agenda.22:19
thewrathcprofitt & pleia2: would it be a good idea to list our sub projects on the wiki22:19
cprofittready to move to the next topic?22:19
pleia2yep22:19
cprofittdoctormo, thewrath we will have a list of teams we are working with...22:19
cprofitt[TOPIC] Structure: Since this team is combining the efforts of several different teams I think a board should be setup for the leadership structure. There has been no discussion on this, but I think it is critical for continued teamwork and project cohesion22:20
MootBotNew Topic:  Structure: Since this team is combining the efforts of several different teams I think a board should be setup for the leadership structure. There has been no discussion on this, but I think it is critical for continued teamwork and project cohesion22:20
Vantraxpleia2: can you add a affiliates part to the wiki page?22:20
Vantrax+1 cprofitt22:20
pleia2Vantrax: yeah, I can do that22:20
cprofittWhile I do not like formal  structure to building teams... and community efforts...22:21
thewrathi think the committe should have a member or two members from all teams concerned22:21
cprofittwith the fact that we are going to work with so many different teams I think we would be best served to do so22:21
cprofittthewrath, that is a good idea until we have numerous teams...22:21
cprofittI would like to suggest something akin to the BT structure, but I am open to suggestions22:22
pleia2yeah, there are far too many teams for that to be feasible22:22
DougieRichardsonnot familiar with the BT structure, link?22:22
Vantraxcprofitt: my suggestion would be to have a 5 person project board22:22
pleia2cprofitt: I'm not familiar with the BT structure, can you explain?22:22
nhandler[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BeginnersTeam/Structure22:22
MootBotLINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BeginnersTeam/Structure22:22
cprofittthanks nhandler22:22
VantraxBT has bodhi as a perm board member, an the others are elected22:22
cprofittThe structure I am looking at is the Jedi Council on that page...22:23
doctormoIt's < 12 > 3 != 8, optimal team sizes of any kind.22:23
cprofittand the BDFL = Bodhi22:23
DougieRichardsonAnything not written from a Star Wars POV ;-)22:23
Vantraxlol22:23
pleia2yes, less dorky please22:23
* pleia2 grins22:23
thewrathi agree sometihgn simialr to the BT jedia council structure i think would be feasible22:23
VantraxUFBT = NERDS:P22:23
cprofittWe do not need the starwars references22:23
pleia2I don't think we should have any perm board members22:24
doctormoI know, next we'll be doing Star Trek federation councils22:24
pleia2but otherwise it seems fine :)22:24
pleia2doctormo: lol22:24
cprofittI am thinking one 'head' position and a council of four perhaps...22:24
Vantraxthat sounds good22:24
pleia2why?22:24
thewrathpleia2: agreed. members should be voted on22:24
cprofittnot sure of anyone's size thoughts22:24
nhandlerWith cprofitt = head22:24
doctormocprofitt: -1, I don't think we need a head yet, none of us are yet in focus of the shared directives.22:24
pleia2doctormo: +122:24
cprofittdoctormo, I agree with waiting on the head...22:25
Vantraxdoctormo: that is also a reason for a head, to give direction22:25
nhandlercprofitt: I think the "council" should have different people who have experience in the different areas/teams we are working with22:25
DougieRichardsonThere are only 19 people in ubuntu-learning, how many people are you envisaging in this venture and should it be this centrally controlled22:25
cprofittbut I think there is a reason for one as we move forward22:25
thewrathdoctormo:  +122:25
doctormoVantrax: In this case, direction is an amalgamation of overlapping priorities, not something that isn't defined.22:25
cprofittDougieRichardson, I envision many in the future... and many of those will also join the projects aligned with out efforts22:25
pleia2right, so the "direction" of the project isn't always going to be best-served by a single leader22:26
pleia2we come from lots of places and presumably all the board members will have different priorities (this will be healthy)22:26
cprofittI was not looking at the head being an overlord22:26
cprofittbut a 'lead contact'22:26
cprofittand tie-breaker22:26
thewrathcprofitt: +122:26
cprofittif we have no 'head' then we need 3 or 5 member board...22:26
thewrathi like that idea. that should be what it is and not a lord22:26
pleia2I'm unconvinced22:26
doctormoA lead will be useful when we have someone who has joined from no other groups, who has contributed a great deal and is focused on the directives that form out of us as a group.22:27
Vantraxthis is, and should always remain a colaberative process22:27
doctormoThen we can have a head.22:27
cprofittdoctormo, pleia2 do we need a lead contact?22:28
pleia2cprofitt: I don't think so22:28
cprofittdoctormo, pleia2 do we need an odd number on the board?22:28
doctormoYes22:28
pleia2yes, odd number22:28
cprofitt3 or 5?22:28
nhandlerI think an odd number is good to have for votes22:28
pleia2522:28
nhandler5 imo22:28
doctormo522:28
thewrathif no dead def an odd number on the board22:28
thewrath5 sounds good22:28
thewrath*lead not dead22:28
cprofittok... lets vote on that22:28
cprofitt[VOTE] Ubuntu-Learning will have a five person board22:29
MootBotPlease vote on:  Ubuntu-Learning will have a five person board.22:29
MootBotPublic votes can be registered by saying +1/-1/+0 in the channel, private votes by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0  to MootBot22:29
MootBotE.g. /msg MootBot +1 #ubuntu-meeting22:29
Vantrax+122:29
cprofitt+122:29
MootBot+1 received from cprofitt. 1 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 122:29
MootBot+1 received from Vantrax. 2 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 222:29
thewrath+122:29
MootBot+1 received from thewrath. 3 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 322:29
nhandler+122:29
pleia2+122:29
MootBot+1 received from nhandler. 4 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 422:29
MootBot+1 received from pleia2. 5 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 522:29
doctormo+122:29
MootBot+1 received from doctormo. 6 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 622:29
DougieRichardson+022:29
MootBotAbstention received from DougieRichardson. 6 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 622:29
cprofitt[ENDVOTE]22:30
MootBotFinal result is 6 for, 0 against. 1 abstained. Total: 622:30
cprofitt[AGREED] Ubuntu-Learning will have a five person board22:30
MootBotAGREED received:  Ubuntu-Learning will have a five person board22:30
Vantraxi would recommend the initial board be cp, bodhi, pleia, dr mo, and myself.22:30
cprofittShould we vote for the board members?22:30
cprofittnot now... but next meeting22:31
thewrathi think we should have a proposal of how is interested and why they should be on the board22:31
Vantraxyes, next meeting i would say22:31
thewrathliek the fg leads in bt cprofitt ?22:31
cprofittok....22:31
thewrath*without the question mark22:31
cprofittthen I will create a page and people interested in being on the board can add their name, etc?22:31
pleia2cprofitt: +122:31
cprofittso we know who is interested22:31
cprofitt[ACTION] cprofitt will make wiki page for board candidates22:32
MootBotACTION received:  cprofitt will make wiki page for board candidates22:32
Vantraxplease do cp, link it the agenda22:32
yvan300cprofitt: +1 great idea22:32
doctormoI gotta get me a MootBot22:32
cprofitt[TOPIC] Meetings: Determine a 'best' time schedule for meetings.22:32
MootBotNew Topic:  Meetings: Determine a 'best' time schedule for meetings.22:32
cprofittCan everyone post their time zone22:32
nhandlerI think we should consider using Doodle to schedule meetings22:32
VantraxGMT+1022:32
nhandler[LINK] http://www.doodle.com/22:32
MootBotLINK received:  http://www.doodle.com/22:32
cprofittEDT (GMT-4)22:32
yvan300cprofitt: most of us live in the western hemisphere22:32
nhandlerUTC-522:32
pleia2EDT (GMT-4)22:33
DougieRichardsonUTC+122:33
thewrathUTC -522:33
yvan300let me find out22:33
pleia2thewrath: you're in my state, you're -4 :)22:33
thewrathpleia2:  ty22:33
cprofittyeah... its UTC-5 when we are EST22:33
cprofittwe are EDT now... GMT-422:33
thewrathpleia2: now its -4 seveal months from now its -522:33
doctormois doodle foss?22:33
pleia2thewrath: you are mistaken22:34
nhandlerdoctormo: I don't know, but we use it for other teams. It is an online tool (no registration needed)22:34
cprofittnhandler, what does doodle do for scheduling?22:34
pleia2oh yes, I used doodle just recently22:34
doctormonhandler: would be nice if this sort of thing was a druple/django module of some sort. bug beggars can't be choosers.22:34
yvan300i'm the same as thewrath22:34
Vantraxwhy not use gcal?22:35
nhandlercprofitt: You create a table listing possible dates and times. Users can then mark which dates/times work for them. It then displays the results in a nice table22:35
cprofittVantrax, what time zone are you?22:35
cprofittah... I found it back a ways22:35
cprofittGMT+1022:35
nhandlerVantrax: gcal is only good for displaying the final meeting time, not choosing one22:35
Vantrax^ GMT +1022:35
pleia2doodle example: http://doodle.com/fquzy498htwcv5ny22:35
cprofittdoes doodle adjust for local times?22:36
cprofittor is it set to one time?22:36
nhandlerYes cprofitt22:36
nhandlerEach user can specify their time zone to have the possible times adjusted22:36
cprofittnhandler, do you want to set one up for us then?22:36
nhandlercprofitt: Sure22:36
cprofittthanks22:36
nhandlerWe are only interested in choosing a time, right? Not a date?22:37
cprofittI would like to pick a 'day' and time22:37
pleia2well, I'd like to see a weekend vs weekday option22:37
cprofittand we need to decide if weekends / weekdays are good.22:37
DougieRichardsonIf everyone shows a typical week's availabilty we get a better guess at a time22:37
pleia2DougieRichardson: +122:37
cprofittI am thinking we need to meet every other week right now...22:37
cprofitt+1 DougieRichardson22:38
cprofittwhat about frequency folks?22:38
pleia2cprofitt: every 2 weeks for now22:38
Vantraxfortnightly22:38
doctormoI'm available all times that the jobless usually are (except 00:00 to 07:00 EST, sleep)22:38
pleia2we can adjust as needed22:38
pleia2doctormo: bah, sleep :)22:38
nhandlerOk, I'll setup the Doodle so we can choose a day of week and time22:38
cprofitt[AGREED] meetings every other week22:38
MootBotAGREED received:  meetings every other week22:38
cprofittthanks nhandler22:40
cprofitt[TOPIC] Rationale: We need to document what the rationale is for forming a new 'team' or creating a 'project' for review by the Community Council22:40
MootBotNew Topic:  Rationale: We need to document what the rationale is for forming a new 'team' or creating a 'project' for review by the Community Council22:40
cprofittThis was a request from bodhi22:40
cprofittand I agree we need this to be a more comprehensive document in the end22:40
yvan300cprofitt: can you explain the topic more22:40
pleia2cprofitt: should we just add our thoughts to the rationale page?22:41
cprofittbodhi wants to present the project to the Community Council on June 2nd22:41
cprofitt[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Rationale22:41
MootBotLINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Rationale22:41
cprofittYes, please everyone add your thoughts on that page22:41
cprofittWe will want to have a complete 'charter' or 'specification' in the end22:42
cprofittbut bodhi wants us to have the rationale by June 2nd22:42
pleia2we will have another meeting before then22:42
cprofittFrom the individual notes I will try to craft a draft... and we can vote on it next time22:42
* pleia2 nods22:42
DougieRichardsonIt needs to follow this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SpecSpec22:43
cprofittby they way anyone who wears a fancy hat (Martin) gets bonus points for his ideas22:43
cprofitt[LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SpecSpec22:43
MootBotLINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SpecSpec22:43
* cprofitt smiles22:43
DougieRichardsonThe rationale is one part but the usage cases are the most important thing, IME22:43
doctormocprofitt: If it needs it, we should create a slight tree rationale where items that veer slightly are given their own sub-projects.22:44
cprofittsounds good...22:44
thewrathdoctormo: +122:44
DougieRichardsonIf the usage cases are clear, other projects will grasp the advatage of the project quicker22:44
cprofitteveryone ok with process?22:44
pleia2yep22:45
doctormoFrom a very quick analsys we may end up with learning vectors as sub-projects. irc, locos, forums etc etc22:45
cprofitt[TOPIC] Review of announcement to Planet, and a call for input on program content. (Vantrax)22:45
MootBotNew Topic:  Review of announcement to Planet, and a call for input on program content. (Vantrax)22:45
Vantraxeveryone read the post im going to be putting up?22:46
nhandlerNo, link?22:46
Vantraxits in the agenda22:46
nhandlerAh22:46
Vantraxhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Learning/Agenda22:46
cprofittMy personal thought upon quick read of the announcement is that we need to rework it given the mission statement change.22:46
Vantraxyep, i will update that bit22:46
DougieRichardsonWhen are you thinking of releasing this?22:46
cprofittThe intention part of it reflects the original mission Vantrax posted, but not the new one.22:46
doctormoShould those goals be meeting actions?22:46
pleia2Vantrax: I mentioned it before, but we want to be very careful about our use of the word "training" - perhaps to the extent of not using it *at all* in our documentation22:47
cprofittI am also thinking we may want to wait until we have the rationale done and after the CC meeting; but unsure of the process potential projects take22:47
pleia2unless it's very specifically targeted :)22:47
Vantraxyeah, that is a point, but we are doing training, and its hard not to mention it22:47
pleia2we're "learning" and "education"22:47
doctormopleia2: And for money, i.e. libal22:47
cprofittI also think that the initial goal has to be expanded to include the idea of enabling teams to use Moodle to improve their existing training options22:48
DougieRichardsoncprofitt: We should wait until the CC meeting.22:48
thewrathinstead of training why not use educating and teaching?22:48
Vantraxcprofitt: this int a potential project, it has been approved by canonical. The CC meeting is more an annoucement.22:48
doctormocprofitt: Teaching the tools and skills of teaching will be section 0,22:48
Vantraxan explanation of what we are doing if you will22:48
pleia2Vantrax: s/We want to take users and turn them into contributing members of the community./We want to take users and turn them into contributing members of the community and expert users of Ubuntu.22:48
pleia2or somesuch22:48
thewrathpleia2: +122:48
doctormopleia2: +1, much more balanced :-)22:49
cprofittWe may have four tracks we all want to see, but the overall part of this project is 'improving' the educations efforts22:49
Vantraxsounds good22:49
doctormo and expert users, maintainers and advocates of Ubuntu22:49
pleia2doctormo: +122:50
cprofittDougieRichardson, I agree we should wait until after the CC22:50
doctormoPerhaps we should be less concerned about the topics in the description?22:50
cprofittVantrax, despite Canonical approval this is a community project22:50
doctormoI mean, mentioning Ubuntu yes, but the aim is teaching and equiping teachers, no?22:50
cprofittand needs approval from the community22:50
Vantraxthe aim is to create a self sustaining education system in the end22:51
doctormoA school?22:51
doctormoA university?22:51
pleia2which includes teaching teachers, developing materials, coordinating sessions22:51
pleia2advertising22:51
DougieRichardsonvantrax:it doesn't work like that. Canonical != Ubuntu22:51
cprofitt[VOTE] Wait on announcement until after CC meeting22:51
MootBotPlease vote on:  Wait on announcement until after CC meeting.22:51
MootBotPublic votes can be registered by saying +1/-1/+0 in the channel, private votes by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0  to MootBot22:51
MootBotE.g. /msg MootBot +1 #ubuntu-meeting22:51
cprofitt+122:51
MootBot+1 received from cprofitt. 1 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 122:51
DougieRichardson+122:51
MootBot+1 received from DougieRichardson. 2 for, 0 against. 0 have abstained. Count is now 222:51
nhandler+022:51
MootBotAbstention received from nhandler. 2 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 222:51
thewrath+122:51
MootBot+1 received from thewrath. 3 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 322:51
doctormo+122:51
MootBot+1 received from doctormo. 4 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 422:51
pleia2+122:52
MootBot+1 received from pleia2. 5 for, 0 against. 1 have abstained. Count is now 522:52
VantraxDougieRichardson: Jono Bacon = community manager? he already said go for it22:52
Vantrax+022:52
MootBotAbstention received from Vantrax. 5 for, 0 against. 2 have abstained. Count is now 522:52
doctormoVantrax: the community is more than jono22:52
Vantraxno argument there22:52
cprofitt[ENDVOTE]22:52
MootBotFinal result is 5 for, 0 against. 2 abstained. Total: 522:52
doctormoVantrax: he's more like the bridge from canonical to ubuntu with a bit of organisational flair.22:52
cprofitt[AGREED] Announcement will wait until after the CC meeting22:53
MootBotAGREED received:  Announcement will wait until after the CC meeting22:53
DougieRichardsonvantrax: if we go to a CC meeting proclaiming an announcement, it will be rejected.22:53
thewrathi agree with DougieRichardson after they have given us approval then announcement22:53
cprofittthank you doctormo DougieRichardson and pleia2 for your advice in regards to the CC22:53
Vantraxfair enough:P22:53
cprofittI respect you all and greatly appreciate the advice22:53
Vantrax<- is playing devils advocate tonight22:54
cprofittVantrax, will your reword the announcement and put it on a draft page?22:54
Vantraxsure22:54
pleia2Vantrax: someone has to :) cheers22:54
cprofittthanks.22:54
Vantraxill link it into the agenda for the next meeting22:54
cprofittAnyone have any non-agenda items?22:54
doctormoDecent will be tollerated with a pillowed fist!22:54
Vantraxlol22:55
cprofittDissent ?22:55
cprofittor Decent?22:55
* cprofitt ponders22:55
doctormocprofitt: yea, creative dislexia22:55
Vantraxeww22:55
doctormosorry22:55
cprofittdoctormo, all forgiven with your hat22:55
cprofitt[ENDMEETING]22:55
nhandler#endmeeting22:55
cprofitt#ENDMEETING22:55
MootBotMeeting finished at 16:55.22:55
cprofittthanks everyone...22:55
cprofittvery productive...22:55
cprofittI appreciate all the fantastic work everyone has put in.22:56
doctormoSo the mode of the learning team is "under construction" until the announcement22:56
Vantraxmore or less22:56
thewrathi would defatinatly would like to help out with anything i can22:56
DougieRichardsonOut of interest, how many are here from other interested teams?22:57
thewrathi think this group will succceed and hoping that maybe ubuntu can be taught in high schools or colleges around thw rold22:57
nhandlero/22:57
thewrathyes nhandler ?22:57
pleia2DougieRichardson: bugsquad is interested but they aren't here, motu school is already doing classes in -classroom22:58
doctormoDougieRichardson: I'm from the LoCo interest, I focus on physical classroom events with local none ubuntu using public.22:58
nhandlerthewrath: I'm just saying that I am with motu ;)22:58
thewrathah22:58
thewrathsorry nhandler misunderstood what you were saying22:58
doctormoshall we move this lack to #ubuntu-learning?22:59
thewrathyea22:59
thewrathlol22:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!