| ub3rst4r | does anyone know how to remove a release? | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | ub3rst4r: there is a little trashcan icon up near the top of the page | 00:05 |
| ub3rst4r | thanks | 00:06 |
| ub3rst4r | it doesnt have it | 00:06 |
| wgrant | ub3rst4r: I see it on my release pages at the end of the 'Released' row in the table at the top of the release page. | 00:09 |
| wgrant | Make sure you're on the actual release page, not on the lists of releases. | 00:09 |
| wgrant | Oh, it's also at the top of that page. | 00:10 |
| wgrant | Ah, no, that deletes the milestone. | 00:10 |
| wgrant | That is confusing. | 00:10 |
| wgrant | beuno: If you're around, what do you think of that? | 00:10 |
| ub3rst4r | and milestones... | 00:29 |
| ub3rst4r | im trying to attach a bug report to one but its not listed | 00:30 |
| wgrant | ub3rst4r: A milestone won't show up in the list on a bug report if it's inactive. It will be inactive if you've created a release from it. | 00:32 |
| wgrant | You can reactivate it, if you wish. | 00:32 |
| ub3rst4r | ahh duh | 00:33 |
| poolie | hello all | 00:54 |
| wgrant | Not even 10am, and I've reported 8 bugs against Launchpad already :( | 00:57 |
| lifeless | wgrant: score | 00:57 |
| === _thumper_ is now known as thumper | ||
| cody-somerville | wgrant, Are there any bugs re: karma at the moment? | 00:58 |
| wgrant | cody-somerville: What about it? | 00:58 |
| cody-somerville | My karma is degrading faster than I can gain it now | 00:58 |
| wgrant | I haven't seen any bugs about that. | 00:58 |
| wgrant | Things are probably still out of balance after Soyuz karma appeared, but that shouldn't affect depreciation AFAICT. | 00:59 |
| cody-somerville | I find my bzr commits give me almost nothing it seems | 00:59 |
| thumper | cody-somerville: the karma score isn't calculated until a daily script runs | 01:00 |
| cody-somerville | thumper, I know | 01:00 |
| cody-somerville | but my karma has been going down and not up anymore :P | 01:00 |
| thumper | cody-somerville: then work harder :P | 01:00 |
| wgrant | Code karma is worth a lot less than a few months ago, because there's so much more of it now. | 01:00 |
| wgrant | Although it's still almost half of my total. | 01:01 |
| cody-somerville | Maybe I need to do some uploads | 01:01 |
| wgrant | Or just create a couple of blueprints. You'll never have to work again. | 01:03 |
| cody-somerville | indeed | 01:04 |
| spm | work on answers helps nicely for karma too. /me is currently the #6 launchpad contributor ;-) | 01:04 |
| wgrant | Does dogfood still accept PPA uploads? staging of course doesn't... | 01:06 |
| poolie | spm:is it just me or does https://lists.ubuntu.com/ not respond? | 01:44 |
| poolie | specifically https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/admindb/bazaar | 01:44 |
| lifeless | poolie: trying | 01:46 |
| spm | poolie: no not just you. chlorine is dead. time to ring james... | 01:46 |
| poolie | :/ | 01:46 |
| poolie | spm: strangely enough actual mail still seems to be getting through at least until recently? | 01:46 |
| spm | poolie: it appears to have died about 25 mins ago. so... | 01:47 |
| poolie | i guess it's not the most awful possible time for london | 01:47 |
| lifeless | 2am | 01:48 |
| lifeless | I have to wonder you consider the most awful possible time ;) | 01:48 |
| mwhudson | 4am is pretty bad | 01:48 |
| spm | he knew and is working on it atm | 01:48 |
| poolie | ah i forgot they're +1 now | 01:50 |
| poolie | i think about 3-4 is the worst | 01:50 |
| poolie | i wonder if it would be any faster to serve the icing and css from the same vhost as the page you're looking at | 02:01 |
| poolie | thereby potentially avoiding some ssl connections | 02:02 |
| lifeless | yes, except you'd then download it per host | 02:02 |
| lifeless | swings & roundabouts I suspect | 02:02 |
| poolie | lifeless: if it's being kept in the memory cache? | 02:24 |
| poolie | i guess sprites would make that stronger | 02:25 |
| ninix | hi | 02:47 |
| ninix | i'm trying to upload the same package (taken from debian, with no modifications) in my ppa, for intrepid and jaunty | 02:48 |
| ninix | i've added the appropriate "/intrepid/" and "/jaunty/" to the incoming variable in the dput.cf | 02:48 |
| ninix | but .. the second has been rejected... | 02:48 |
| ninix | File ... .diff.gz already exists. | 02:49 |
| lifeless | have you rebuilt it (dpkg-buildpackage -S) | 02:49 |
| ninix | i built it with it..... i dit a debuild -S -sd | 02:49 |
| ninix | *did* | 02:49 |
| lifeless | you need to do that and change the changelog too | 02:49 |
| lifeless | the target is in the changelog | 02:49 |
| lifeless | not indput | 02:49 |
| ninix | lifeless: i don't need to do any change to the package. so i don't change the changelog file | 02:50 |
| lifeless | ninix: unfortunately you are wrong :) | 02:50 |
| ninix | does the -sd could be the problem ? | 02:51 |
| ninix | lifeless: we can specify the different path in the dput | 02:51 |
| ninix | why should I add a ... fake entry in the changelog if i've made no change :/ | 02:52 |
| lifeless | you don't need to add an entry | 02:52 |
| lifeless | you needto change the target | 02:52 |
| ninix | ha | 02:53 |
| ninix | i can do that ? just change the codename and that's it ? | 02:53 |
| lifeless | assuming it builds ok yes | 02:54 |
| ninix | emm ok | 02:54 |
| ninix | thx | 02:54 |
| ninix | no, that change nothing | 03:02 |
| ninix | we can't just change the codename | 03:02 |
| ninix | i'll need to change the version for each codename o_O | 03:04 |
| wgrant | ninix: Whatyou can do is upload to the oldest series, and copy to the new ones. But you'll need to check that it doesn't actually need rebuilding in the new ones. | 03:23 |
| wgrant | That's how we do it in Ubuntu - most of the binaries in each release were copied from the previous release. | 03:24 |
| mwhudson | wgrant: do you have numbers or an intuition for how many packages do/don't get rebuilt for each release? | 03:26 |
| wgrant | I do - I generate those lists myself, and they're available somewhere on qa.ubuntuwire.org... let me find them. | 03:26 |
| mwhudson | wgrant: btw, thanks for recommending evolution | 03:28 |
| mwhudson | seems less annoying so far than tbird | 03:28 |
| wgrant | mwhudson: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/unchanged/ | 03:29 |
| wgrant | mwhudson: Right, that's what I thought... I've been trying it periodically for years, and finally found it to be workable. | 03:30 |
| mwhudson | wgrant: ta | 03:31 |
| poolie | spm: have you seen the two recent posts about launchpad oopses? | 06:16 |
| poolie | to l-users | 06:16 |
| poolie | it seems to be working for me though | 06:17 |
| spm | poolie: nope. but looking now... | 06:17 |
| noshelter | hey, for the launchpad question/answer system, are the questions present on a newsgroup server? | 06:23 |
| noshelter | it would be easier to use than the web id assume... | 06:23 |
| === abentley1 is now known as abentley | ||
| spm | noshelter: 1. not that I'm aware of and would be highly surprised if it was. and 2. you can use email as well. having said that, I personally prefer the web ui (tho will deny having said so if beuno ever reads this). is just easier to get around - for me - to the various tasks the questions refer to. ymmv. | 06:31 |
| noshelter | thx spm, good to know :) | 06:32 |
| spm | poolie: we don't appear to be doing worse than usual (gee isn't that nicely phrased... :-) ) at the moment? | 06:39 |
| spm | the 2nd email appears to be referencing the issues we had until our sat | 06:40 |
| spm | ... well till hopefully our sat when tom pushed out the latest CP with fixes for it. | 06:40 |
| wgrant | spm: The 57000 of the one OOPS in a day issues? | 07:26 |
| wgrant | That's fixed now? | 07:26 |
| spm | wgrant: if we're talking the same "problem" (was 3 related ones aiui) - hopefully yes. | 07:27 |
| wgrant | spm: Good, good. | 07:28 |
| wgrant | Should it be removed from the topic? | 07:28 |
| spm | checking what actually went out on sat - and if it addresses that bug. certainly francis' discussion reflects the one I saw fri morning. | 07:31 |
| spm | wgrant: yes, I think it can. we are seeing some translation issues atm - but only on edge. | 07:31 |
| === spm changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | ||
| scuba- | Hi, anyone in here familiar with the build system? I get a an error with sed-expressions which I don't get in Ubuntu and wondering whats different? | 07:51 |
| wgrant | scuba-: You might want to post a link to your build log. | 07:54 |
| scuba- | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26534074/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.openttd_0.7.0~svn20090509~r16261~ppa1~jaunty4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 08:07 |
| wgrant | staging's broken? | 09:46 |
| * apw notes he has just been warned that his membership of a group was about to expire. and that he was given 6 days warning only. if i had been on vacation ... i'd have been expired before i even saw the first of the daily warnings ?? is this expected behaviour or broken? | 10:03 | |
| Nafallo | apw: don't go on vacation? ;-) | 10:05 |
| apw | heh | 10:05 |
| wgrant | apw: That's normal behaviour. File a bug asking for something more - maybe a one-month warning as well? | 10:34 |
| apw | wgrant, ack | 10:34 |
| MTecknology | I tried to add a new project using the link on the frontpage on edge.lp.net and got OOPS-1227EA81 | 10:38 |
| MTecknology | I tried going to just +new instead of +new-guided and it brought me to a login form | 10:39 |
| === bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: bigjools | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | ||
| bigjools | MTecknology: can you file a bug about that please | 10:44 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: I'm going to take a nap, but I will when I wake up :) | 10:53 |
| bigjools | MTecknology: I'm jealous :) | 10:53 |
| MTecknology | no you're not... | 10:53 |
| MTecknology | It's 04:53 and I woke up for work 20:00. I have about 4hr nap after work | 10:54 |
| MTecknology | and the pads on the bottom of my laptop are worn out. I ordered a new battery for the thing a 5 months ago and I'm still fighting to get it... | 10:55 |
| MTecknology | g'night :) | 10:55 |
| joaopinto | hi | 11:54 |
| joaopinto | does a team renaming applies the change to the associated mailing list ? | 11:54 |
| bigjools | joaopinto: I'm not sure, but I can find out for you, one moment | 12:20 |
| === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening | ||
| barry | wgrant: just checked now, re bug 372165. it's possible it took a little while for the change to land on staging. | 13:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 372165 in launchpad-registry "Misleading error message leads users to do silly things" [Low,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/372165 | 13:20 |
| === danilos is now known as danilo-afk | ||
| wgrant | barry: I still see the problematic error on staging now: "Select all licenses for this software or select Other/Proprietary or Other/Open Source." | 13:28 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| wgrant | barry: To clarify, the subject of that bug is the error message, not the caption of the mass of checkboxes. | 13:44 |
| jblount | I'm getting consistent oopes when changing the branding of a lp project: (Error ID: OOPS-1227EC134) any insight? (2 projects worked, 1 didn't) | 13:50 |
| beuno | hrm | 13:58 |
| beuno | ShortListTooBigError: Hard limit of 1000 exceeded. | 13:58 |
| beuno | sinzui, flacoste, does that sound familiar? ^ | 13:58 |
| sinzui | no familiar | 13:58 |
| sinzui | oh | 13:58 |
| beuno | jblount, I'd say file a bug with that OOOPs ID | 13:59 |
| sinzui | beuno: jblount it may be the same error I get when I review the license of launchpad itself. we cannot make a snapshot to complete the transaction | 13:59 |
| sinzui | jblount: which project? | 14:00 |
| beuno | sinzui, "ubunet" apparently | 14:00 |
| jblount | beuno: yes | 14:00 |
| barry | wgrant: thanks, reopening | 14:04 |
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| jblount | sinzui, beuno: #374867 | 14:16 |
| beuno | jblount, thanks | 14:16 |
| sinzui | thannk | 14:16 |
| jblount | :D | 14:16 |
| flacoste | sinzu, beuno, jblount: that sounds like a call site that shouldn't use shortlist somehow | 14:21 |
| sinzui | flacoste: I suspect that is the case. | 14:22 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| radix | I'm getting a "Not allowed here" when I visit code.launchpad.net or code.edge.launchpad.net (just the front page) | 16:16 |
| radix | it seems to only happen when I'm logged in | 16:17 |
| beuno | flacoste, ^ | 16:18 |
| beuno | kiko, ^ | 16:18 |
| kiko | radix, do you get an OOPS ID? | 16:18 |
| kiko | it's a problem in the code which is fetching private projects in the cloud | 16:18 |
| radix | no, it's just "Not allowed here" header | 16:19 |
| radix | and | 16:19 |
| radix | Sorry, you don't have permission to access this page. | 16:19 |
| radix | You are logged in as Christopher Armstrong. | 16:19 |
| flacoste | kiko: we don't show OOPS id on unauthorized page | 16:19 |
| kiko | radix, hmmm | 16:19 |
| kiko | flacoste, we could though | 16:19 |
| kiko | anyway, matsubara, help me find that OOPS ID when it shows up? | 16:19 |
| matsubara | kiko: I think we don't log them anymore. | 16:20 |
| flacoste | matsubara: we do | 16:21 |
| flacoste | matsubara: when the user is logged in | 16:21 |
| matsubara | ah ok | 16:21 |
| radix | need me to do it again? | 16:24 |
| matsubara | radix: that's probably bug 342467. I'm waiting the oopses to sync to devpad | 16:25 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 342467 in launchpad-code "code.launchpad.net returns a forbidden error" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/342467 | 16:25 |
| matsubara | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1227EA183 | 16:28 |
| matsubara | kiko: radix ^ | 16:28 |
| kiko | thanks matsubara | 16:29 |
| * MTecknology tickles kiko | 16:29 | |
| kiko | hey MTecknology | 16:30 |
| kiko | did you ever answer me about those projects the last time I asked you? | 16:30 |
| kiko | I certainly didn't do anything about them! | 16:30 |
| MTecknology | yup | 16:30 |
| MTecknology | go for it | 16:30 |
| kiko | thanks | 16:31 |
| MTecknology | :) | 16:31 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| kiko | matsubara, the root cause is we are attempting to display a private branch on that page to a person who can't see it | 16:34 |
| kiko | yay for security wrappers | 16:35 |
| matsubara | kiko: yeah, I added that OOPS to the bug report and set it to high. I'll ask someone from Code to have a look | 16:35 |
| kiko | thanks matsubara and radix | 16:36 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| radix | sure thing | 16:37 |
| === bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | ||
| MTecknology | bigjools: have a good day :) | 17:02 |
| bigjools | MTecknology: thanks :) time for my medication | 17:02 |
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| LaPingvino1 | Hello | 17:10 |
| LaPingvino1 | ping asac (refered by Joey Stanford) | 17:11 |
| LaPingvino1 | I have a question about firefox translations in launchpad | 17:11 |
| LaPingvino1 | anybody here? | 17:12 |
| asac | LaPingvino1: sure. anything secret? otherwise i prefer #ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net for ffox discussions. | 17:14 |
| asac | oops | 17:14 |
| asac | ;) | 17:14 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| asac | LaPingvino1: yeah. so #ubuntu-mozilateam would be better | 17:14 |
| LaPingvino1 | sorry, new here in the ubuntu irc | 17:15 |
| asac | LaPingvino1: thats fine | 17:15 |
| ninix | How can i solve this error: (same version already has published binaries in the destination archive) when i try to copy a packages from intrepid to jaunty | 17:23 |
| ninix | i've deleted all packages in jaunty | 17:23 |
| beuno | ninix, bump the version | 17:24 |
| bigjools | ninix: it means that your source is already built in the same PPA, you need to copy binaries as well | 17:24 |
| ninix | ok, so i have to select copy existing binaries 6 | 17:25 |
| bigjools | yep | 17:26 |
| bigjools | ninix: if copying binaries is not the right thing for you, then bump the version and upload a new source as beuno says | 17:27 |
| ninix | ok, that's worked. But why the source has been built for jaunty? if i explicitly uploaded it in /myppa/ubuntu/intrepid/ | 17:27 |
| bigjools | ninix: it's an artifact of using a pool-based repository, you can't have the same binaries in there twice | 17:28 |
| ninix | copying binaries implies that everything built properly in jaunty also? | 17:28 |
| bigjools | it simply re-publishes the same source and binaries in jaunty | 17:28 |
| ninix | Hmm.. that doesn't sound safe | 17:30 |
| bigjools | ninix: well it's what happens when a new Ubuntu series opens :) | 17:30 |
| ninix | i would prefer that launchpad retry to build it in jaunty to be sure | 17:30 |
| bigjools | ninix: then you need to upload a new source with a higher version, targeted to jaunty | 17:31 |
| ninix | Ok, i thought i could do that, with the copy option. (I know that the source build properly in jaunty), but it needs to be rebuild | 17:32 |
| bigjools | ninix: it prevents the copy because it would generate the same binary package versions that were already in the pool, but likely with different contents, so would fail to upload the build, | 17:33 |
| ninix | k | 17:34 |
| bigjools | it's quite valid to build for an older series and promote the packages to newer ones | 17:34 |
| bigjools | as long as the binary works, of course | 17:35 |
| ninix | yeak | 17:36 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === beuno_ is now known as beuno | ||
| Jordan_U | How can I make my PPA a signed PPA? | 18:38 |
| beuno | Jordan_U, it will sign all packages as soon as you upload the first one | 18:39 |
| Jordan_U | beuno: Odd, a few days ago I didn't see the "This repository is signed with..." message on my PPA page a few days ago, I guess I just missed it because it's there now :) | 18:41 |
| beuno | Jordan_U, it triggers signing it after the first package is uploaded | 18:42 |
| Jordan_U | beuno: I had uploaded a package, I probably just missed the message somehow | 18:43 |
| LarstiQ | it also takes some time to generate the signing key. | 18:43 |
| LarstiQ | 4 minutes for the creation, and a 20 minute cronjob, iirc | 18:43 |
| Jordan_U | How can I remove a PPA? | 18:44 |
| apachelogger | cprov: ping | 18:45 |
| cprov | Jordan_U: ifw, you can't. What's your problem ? | 18:47 |
| cprov | Jordan_U: you can just leave it there ... and create a new one, the same signing key will be used for signing packages in the new PPA | 18:47 |
| Jordan_U | cprov: I created a PPA named "test" just for experimentation, I'd like to get rid of it though it's not really important | 18:48 |
| cprov | Jordan_U: obviously you can delete all packages yourself and 'start again' | 18:48 |
| cprov | Jordan_U: oh, right, leave it alone. | 18:49 |
| Jordan_U | cprov: Any reason why PPAs can't be removed? | 18:49 |
| apachelogger | cprov: the Packages* files of private PPAs are pretty broken ... take a glimps at kubuntu-ninjas/ppa/ubuntu/dists/jaunty/main/binary-amd64/ for example | 18:50 |
| cprov | Jordan_U: few, one of then is that it involved disk operations. | 18:50 |
| cprov | apachelogger: empty | 18:51 |
| apachelogger | exactly :) | 18:51 |
| apachelogger | works for normal ppas though http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-experimental/ppa/ubuntu/dists/jaunty/main/binary-amd64/ | 18:52 |
| thekorn | mrevell, hi, I got my launchpad shirt today, thanks a lot | 18:52 |
| apachelogger | cprov: I suppose there is no quick fix? | 18:52 |
| cprov | apachelogger: fix for what ? | 18:53 |
| apachelogger | cprov: the files being empty | 18:53 |
| cprov | apachelogger: is there anything published in jaunty ? | 18:53 |
| apachelogger | cprov: yes, also in intrepid, neither of them is working | 18:53 |
| cprov | apachelogger: I can't view your P3A | 18:54 |
| apachelogger | ah | 18:54 |
| apachelogger | cprov: maybe I am wrong | 18:54 |
| apachelogger | apparently jontheechidna did nuke them all | 18:54 |
| apachelogger | cprov: sorry, for the noise :) | 18:54 |
| cprov | apachelogger: check the PPA page, it will tell you | 18:54 |
| cprov | apachelogger: cool, np. | 18:54 |
| beuno | so, for those of you on edge, you will probably be able to edit bug tags inline tomorrow | 19:34 |
| beuno | you can send chocolates to intellectronica and mars | 19:34 |
| intellectronica | can you please send lettuce instead? i'm on a diet | 19:44 |
| LarstiQ | intellectronica: whereto? | 19:45 |
| beuno | chocolate lettuce for intellectronica then | 19:45 |
| Nafallo | eeeew | 19:45 |
| intellectronica | LarstiQ: anywhere in the world, really. sooner or later there will be a sprint there and i'll pick it up | 19:45 |
| Nafallo | intellectronica: lol | 19:45 |
| LarstiQ | intellectronica: I'll bring it with me to EuroPython then | 19:46 |
| intellectronica | LarstiQ: is it in the uk this year? i might even go | 19:47 |
| LarstiQ | intellectronica: indeed it is. | 19:47 |
| mrooney | Anyone know if there is a problem with mailing list password reminders? I have tried a bunch of times over the past week to get a reminder for https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/options/ubuntu-art but it never comes | 19:59 |
| mrooney | So unfortunately I can't change my address to the correct one so I can respond | 19:59 |
| beuno | mthaddon, ^ | 20:00 |
| beuno | barry, ^ | 20:00 |
| mthaddon | beuno: those are ubuntu mailing lists, not LP mailing lists | 20:00 |
| beuno | ah | 20:01 |
| barry | mthaddon: that's what i was going to say :) | 20:01 |
| beuno | elmo, ^ :) | 20:01 |
| mrooney | oh ok | 20:01 |
| mrooney | there are too many types of mailing lists :) | 20:01 |
| mrooney | where might I go for support in that arena? | 20:01 |
| mthaddon | mrooney: your best bet would be to check in #canonical-sysadmin | 20:02 |
| mthaddon | mrooney: and/or file an RT ("please mail requests to rt@ubuntu.com") | 20:02 |
| === ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
| soren | On the /+activereviews page, there's "Reviews I need to do" and "Reviews I can do". How are they defined (and thus: what's the difference)? | 21:06 |
| beuno | soren, when s review was explictely requested from you | 21:08 |
| intellectronica | soren: reviews you need to do were requested specifically from you. reviews you can do are ones you have the option to review, because you're a member of a team | 21:08 |
| soren | beuno, intellectronica: Ah, I see. Thanks. | 21:09 |
| pace_t_zulu | I have a question regarding PPA... how do you produce the P_V_source.changes file? | 21:12 |
| maxb | It should be produced by the same process which builds the .dsc, tar.gz and diff.gz | 21:13 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: with pbuilder? | 21:13 |
| LarstiQ | for me that is bzr-builddeb invoking debuild invoking dpkg-buildpackage invoking.. | 21:14 |
| LarstiQ | pace_t_zulu: pdebuild would do that I think | 21:14 |
| pace_t_zulu | LarstiQ: thank you | 21:14 |
| maxb | Whatever your build environment, it eventually involves something running dpkg-buildpackage | 21:14 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: thank you | 21:17 |
| pace_t_zulu | pbuilder doesn't seem to do everything needed for launchpad | 21:18 |
| pace_t_zulu | nor does pdebuild | 21:18 |
| maxb | Are you really not getting a .changes file? | 21:19 |
| pace_t_zulu | i do but it is not signed | 21:20 |
| pace_t_zulu | and it has the old version number | 21:20 |
| maxb | um. You must have done something wrong then | 21:21 |
| LarstiQ | `debsign` is the tool used (under the hood) for signing .changes files | 21:21 |
| maxb | Anyway pbuilder is overkill for building a source package for upload, IMO | 21:21 |
| LarstiQ | the old version number though.. | 21:21 |
| maxb | I would use just dpkg-buildpackage -S | 21:21 |
| pace_t_zulu | http://paste.ubuntu.com/169938/ | 21:23 |
| pace_t_zulu | that's the error i guet | 21:23 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: will try dpkg-buildpackage -S | 21:23 |
| maxb | pace_t_zulu: As launchpad only accepts source uploads, you must have a _source.changes for it to accept it | 21:25 |
| maxb | practically that means building the source with and -S flag "source only build" | 21:25 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: thank you | 21:25 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: will do the 'dpkg-buildpackage -S' as soon as the build deps are installed | 21:26 |
| maxb | You may or may not also need -sa or -sd | 21:26 |
| maxb | These specify whether to include the .orig.tar.gz, or to omit it because it can already be found in your PPA or in Ubuntu itself | 21:27 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: i have a new problem | 21:37 |
| pace_t_zulu | will pastbin | 21:37 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/169946/ | 21:38 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: right at the end when gpg gets involved | 21:39 |
| maxb | This simply means that the username and email found in the changelog entry do not have a secret key available matching them | 21:40 |
| maxb | Change the changelog entry footer to match the identity of your key, or manually specify the keyid (-k) | 21:40 |
| maxb | You can use debsign to sign the produced package after the build, rather than rebuilding | 21:41 |
| Shock | hi I got this error: File linux_2.6.28-11.42.diff.gz already exists in PPA, but uploaded version has different content. How do I fix it? | 21:41 |
| LarstiQ | Shock: bump the version | 21:41 |
| Shock | cant | 21:41 |
| Shock | what else? | 21:42 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: so should I produce a new debdiff? | 21:42 |
| maxb | Shock: Once you have uploaded any versioned file to an archive, you can never change it | 21:42 |
| pace_t_zulu | :/ | 21:42 |
| Shock | maxb: huh?\ | 21:42 |
| Shock | that's kinda nasty | 21:43 |
| maxb | No it's not | 21:43 |
| Shock | why is it useful? | 21:43 |
| maxb | It's fundamental to having version numbers actually be reliable identifiers of packages | 21:43 |
| Shock | that's like saying people are morons and we don't trust them with version numbers :) | 21:44 |
| Shock | there's gotta be a way to fix this | 21:44 |
| LarstiQ | Shock: the normal thing to do is bump the version, why is that not an option? | 21:45 |
| Shock | LarstiQ: if I bump the version the build will fail (version ABI checks) | 21:45 |
| LarstiQ | it checks the version of the package? *blinks* | 21:46 |
| LarstiQ | Shock: I'm not suggesting you bump the upstream version, but the packaging version. | 21:47 |
| Shock | LarstiQ: it checks the changelog version | 21:47 |
| LarstiQ | oh wow | 21:47 |
| Shock | LarstiQ: is there another way to bump the version without involving the changelog? | 21:47 |
| maxb | Shock: But only the "11" bit of it, no? | 21:47 |
| Shock | maxb: unfortunately np | 21:47 |
| Shock | s/np/no/ | 21:48 |
| LarstiQ | Shock: no | 21:48 |
| Shock | is it ok to paste 2 lines? | 21:50 |
| LarstiQ | Shock: 2 lines sounds sane | 21:51 |
| Shock | EE: Previous or current ABI file missing! | 21:52 |
| Shock | prevabidir: /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/debian/abi/2.6.28-11.42ubuntu1/amd64/generic | 21:52 |
| Shock | that's what happens when I bump the version | 21:52 |
| LarstiQ | that's a shame | 21:53 |
| * LarstiQ doesn't know about kernel build specifics | 21:53 | |
| Shock | might be a kernel build system bug, but i'm too tired to look into that now | 21:53 |
| LarstiQ | and I'm falling asleep, so gnight | 21:53 |
| Shock | g'nite | 21:53 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: should the changelog have the key in it? | 21:54 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: or is it that i hadn't specified my GPGKEY in my ~/.bashrc? | 21:54 |
| maxb | Either the -- line at the end of the top changelog entry must exactly correspond to the user id printed by "gpg --list-secret-keys" or you must specify the hex keyid with a -k option when building or signing | 21:56 |
| bdmurray | I get a weird error on a bug package if I click on a hyperlink in the bug (like an attachment) if I don't let the subscriber portlet finish loading. | 21:58 |
| bdmurray | s/package/page/ | 21:58 |
| intellectronica | bdmurray: whoa. what happens? | 21:59 |
| bdmurray | intellectronica: the attachment continues to load but I see a brief pop up regarding couldn't find you(?) | 22:01 |
| intellectronica | bdmurray: "couldn't find you"? | 22:02 |
| bdmurray | intellectronica: it's really brief | 22:02 |
| bdmurray | "Cound not find your account" | 22:03 |
| intellectronica | bdmurray: yup, i can reproduce | 22:03 |
| intellectronica | bdmurray: care to file a bug? deryck or myself will look at it tomorrow | 22:04 |
| bdmurray | intellectronica: doing so now, shall I subscribe you? | 22:05 |
| intellectronica | bdmurray: no need. i get all bug mail for malone anyway | 22:06 |
| intellectronica | bdmurray: and thanks a lot | 22:06 |
| intellectronica | all this dynamic ui is quite hard to get right, and the help we're getting with testing and reporting bugs is extremely valuable | 22:07 |
| pace_t_zulu | maxb: thank you for the -k switch for dpgk-buildpackage | 22:09 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| pace_t_zulu | is it possible to have a private PPA? | 22:48 |
| intellectronica | pace_t_zulu: it is, for a fee. if interested, talk to bac | 22:51 |
| ninix | Is it possible to people to Report a bug directly associated to our PPA ? | 23:04 |
| beuno | ninix, not at the moment, no | 23:05 |
| ninix | :( | 23:05 |
| beuno | just against Ubuntu packages or Projects | 23:05 |
| beuno | it's something we want to do, but it will take a while (6-12 months maybe) | 23:05 |
| ninix | Ok, thx for the info | 23:05 |
| wgrant | intellectronica, bdmurray: I filed a bug on that subscriber portlet error yesterday. | 23:06 |
| wgrant | Ah, I see matsubara has already duped it. | 23:06 |
| intellectronica | wgrant: yeah, looks like i missed it, and by now matsubara duped it appropriately | 23:07 |
| intellectronica | on my way to bed, but will look at this tomorrow | 23:07 |
| matsubara | wgrant: yep, even though your was older, the newer one was already triaged and targeted to a milestone. | 23:07 |
| wgrant | intellectronica: I filed it against launchpad rather than malone, so you probably wouldn't have seen it. | 23:07 |
| wgrant | matsubara: Right. | 23:07 |
| matsubara | and had a easier way to reproduce | 23:07 |
| wgrant | Yep. | 23:07 |
| gilir | hi, can someone kill the build https://edge.launchpad.net/~gilir/+archive/unstable/+build/999312 ? I think it's in a loop | 23:07 |
| intellectronica | wgrant: right, that would explain why i didn't spot it | 23:08 |
| maxb | OOI, does anyone know why the amd64 buildds are so much slower than the lpia ones? | 23:14 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| ninix | arf :|, i just realized that If i have a package X (no dependencies) for hardy,intrepid,jaunty in my PPA. and i have also a package Y(3 codenames also) that has the X packages as dependency. and also a package Z that has X,Y has dependencies...... and i have an update of the package X..... i'll need to reupload/rebuild all the package X, Y, Z for each codename :S | 23:44 |
| ninix | How do you deal with that ? Am I wrong ? | 23:44 |
| wgrant | ninix: Do the packages actually need rebuilding every time in each release? | 23:45 |
| ninix | and that's a small example... i'll probably have ~50 packages in the ppa | 23:46 |
| wgrant | And can you not copy most of the packages from older releases to newer ones? | 23:46 |
| ninix | Not necessary... but if i want that my package Z can benefit the change in the package X.... yes. | 23:48 |
| ninix | wgrant: i'm trying to maintain my packages up-to-date for 3 codenames at the time. (1 year of ubuntu release) | 23:48 |
| wgrant | ninix: You could script it. | 23:48 |
| ninix | the fake version change + upload you mean? | 23:50 |
| wgrant | ninix: Yes. | 23:50 |
| wgrant | But I'm really not sure that you need to build them in all three releases... | 23:51 |
| maxb | I'm also not sure why you need to rebuild Y and Z when you change X | 23:51 |
| wgrant | I was wondering that, but it is possible. | 23:52 |
| ninix | per example... my software Z try to detect if the package X has a few support (depending on version), if it has... it enable the code etc.. | 23:53 |
| lifeless | 'win 72 | 23:55 |
| ninix | wgrant: i suppose that i can do a copy if my package need no change in both release ? | 23:56 |
| wgrant | ninix: Exactly. | 23:57 |
| ninix | but what i don't understand is..... | 23:57 |
| ninix | if my package needs no change in both...... but there is a version of a dependency in the higher release that could add some support in my package (if rebuilded) ... a simple copy will not allow that, right? | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!